scholarly journals Erythropoietin response to anaemia in heart failure

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Montero ◽  
Thomas Haider ◽  
Andreas J Flammer
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Meta Regression

Background Despite multiple factors correlating with the high prevalence of anaemia in heart failure, the prevailing mechanisms have yet to be established. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature and determine whether low circulating haemoglobin is primarily underlain by erythropoietin resistance or defective production in heart failure. Design and methods We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE since its inception until May 2017 for articles reporting erythropoietin and haemoglobin concentrations in heart failure patients not treated with erythropoietin-stimulating agents. The primary outcome was the mean difference in observed/predicted (O/P) erythropoietin ratio between heart failure patients and normal reference values. Meta-regression analyses assessed the influence of potential moderating factors. Results Forty-one studies were included after systematic review, comprising a total of 3137 stable heart failure patients with mean age and left ventricular ejection fraction ranging from 52 years to 80 years and 21% to 59%. The O/P erythropoietin ratio was below reference values in 24 of 25 studies in anaemic heart failure patients ( n = 1094, range = 0.49–1.05), whereas only one out of 16 studies in non-anaemic heart failure patients presented a low O/P erythropoietin ratio ( n = 2043, range = 0.91–1.97). In studies comparing anaemic versus non-anaemic heart failure patients ( n = 1531), the mean O/P erythropoietin ratio was consistently reduced in anaemic heart failure patients (mean difference = –0.68, 95% confidence interval = −0.78, −0.57; p < 0.001). In meta-regression, the O/P erythropoietin ratio was negatively associated with age, female sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, inflammation and disease severity. Conclusion Anaemia in heart failure is overwhelmingly characterized by impaired erythropoietin production, which is exacerbated with age, female sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, inflammation and disease severity.

Abstract P232: Screening Past B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Values to Identify Candidates for Treatment of Systolic Dysfunction

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parisa Gholami ◽  
Shoutzu Lin ◽  
Paul Heidenreich
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: BNP testing is now common though it is not clear if the test results are used to improve patient care. A high BNP may be an indicator that the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is low (<40%) such that the patient will benefit from life-prolonging therapy. Objective: To determine how often clinicians obtained a measure of LVEF (echocardiography, nuclear) following a high BNP value when the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was not known to be low (<40%). Methods and Results: We reviewed the medical records of 296 consecutive patients (inpatient or outpatient) with a BNP values of at least 200 pg/ml at a single medical center (tertiary hospital with 8 community clinics). A prior diagnosis of heart failure was made in 65%, while 42% had diabetes, 79% had hypertension, 59% had ischemic heart disease and 31% had chronic lung disease. The mean age was 73 ± 12 years, 75% were white, 10% black, 15% other and the mean BNP was 810 ± 814 pg/ml. The LVEF was known to be < 40% in 84 patients (28%, mean BNP value of 1094 ± 969 pg/ml). Of the remaining 212 patients without a known low LVEF, 161 (76%) had a prior LVEF >=40% ( mean BNP value of 673 ± 635 pg/ml), and 51 (24%) had no prior LVEF documented (mean BNP 775 ± 926 pg/ml). Following the high BNP, a measure of LVEF was obtained (including outside studies documented by the primary care provider) within 6 months in only 53% (113 of 212) of those with an LVEF not known to be low. Of those with a follow-up echocardiogram, the LVEF was <40% in 18/113 (16%) and >=40% in 95/113 (84%). There was no significant difference in mean initial BNP values between those with a follow-up LVEF <40% (872 ± 940pg/ml), >=40% (704 ± 737 pg/ml), or not done (661 ± 649 pg/ml, p=0.5). Conclusions: Follow-up measures of LVEF did not occur in almost 50% of patients with a high BNP where the information may have led to institution of life-prolonging therapy. Of those that did have a follow-up study a new diagnosis of depressesd LVEF was noted in 16%. Screening of existing BNP and LVEF data and may be an efficient strategy to identify patients that may benefit from life-prolonging therapy for heart failure.

scholarly journals Impact of telemedicine on the clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of patients with chronic heart failure and mid-range or preserved ejection fraction managed in a multidisciplinary chronic heart failure programme: A sub-analysis of the iCOR randomized trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 64-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago Jiménez-Marrero ◽  
Sergi Yun ◽  
Miguel Cainzos-Achirica ◽  
Cristina Enjuanes ◽  
Alberto Garay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Heart Failure Patients

Background The efficacy of telemedicine in the management of patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40% is poorly understood. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of a telemedicine-based intervention specifically in these patients, as compared to standard of care alone. Methods The Insuficiència Cardiaca Optimització Remota (iCOR) study was a single centre, randomised, controlled trial, designed to evaluate a telemedicine intervention added to an existing hospital/primary care multidisciplinary, integrated programme for chronic heart failure patients. 178 participants were randomised to telemedicine or usual care, and were followed for six months. For the present sub-analysis, only iCOR participants (n = 116) with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40% were included. The primary study endpoint was the incidence of an acute non-fatal heart failure event, defined as a new episode of worsening of symptoms and signs consistent with acute heart failure requiring intravenous diuretic therapy. The healthcare-related costs in each study group were also evaluated. Results The incidence of the first occurrence of the primary endpoint was significantly lower in the telemedicine arm (22% vs 56%, p<0.001), with a hazard ratio of 0.33 comparing to the usual care arm (95% confidence interval 0.17–0.64). Telemedicine was also associated with lower mean overall chronic heart failure care-related costs compared to usual care (8163€ vs 4993€, p=0.001). The results were consistent in both left ventricular ejection fraction of 40–49% and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% patients. Conclusions Our results suggest that telemedicine is a promising strategy for the management of chronic heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%. These findings should be replicated in larger cohorts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document