Abstract P232: Screening Past B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Values to Identify Candidates for Treatment of Systolic Dysfunction

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parisa Gholami ◽  
Shoutzu Lin ◽  
Paul Heidenreich
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: BNP testing is now common though it is not clear if the test results are used to improve patient care. A high BNP may be an indicator that the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is low (<40%) such that the patient will benefit from life-prolonging therapy. Objective: To determine how often clinicians obtained a measure of LVEF (echocardiography, nuclear) following a high BNP value when the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was not known to be low (<40%). Methods and Results: We reviewed the medical records of 296 consecutive patients (inpatient or outpatient) with a BNP values of at least 200 pg/ml at a single medical center (tertiary hospital with 8 community clinics). A prior diagnosis of heart failure was made in 65%, while 42% had diabetes, 79% had hypertension, 59% had ischemic heart disease and 31% had chronic lung disease. The mean age was 73 ± 12 years, 75% were white, 10% black, 15% other and the mean BNP was 810 ± 814 pg/ml. The LVEF was known to be < 40% in 84 patients (28%, mean BNP value of 1094 ± 969 pg/ml). Of the remaining 212 patients without a known low LVEF, 161 (76%) had a prior LVEF >=40% ( mean BNP value of 673 ± 635 pg/ml), and 51 (24%) had no prior LVEF documented (mean BNP 775 ± 926 pg/ml). Following the high BNP, a measure of LVEF was obtained (including outside studies documented by the primary care provider) within 6 months in only 53% (113 of 212) of those with an LVEF not known to be low. Of those with a follow-up echocardiogram, the LVEF was <40% in 18/113 (16%) and >=40% in 95/113 (84%). There was no significant difference in mean initial BNP values between those with a follow-up LVEF <40% (872 ± 940pg/ml), >=40% (704 ± 737 pg/ml), or not done (661 ± 649 pg/ml, p=0.5). Conclusions: Follow-up measures of LVEF did not occur in almost 50% of patients with a high BNP where the information may have led to institution of life-prolonging therapy. Of those that did have a follow-up study a new diagnosis of depressesd LVEF was noted in 16%. Screening of existing BNP and LVEF data and may be an efficient strategy to identify patients that may benefit from life-prolonging therapy for heart failure.

Abstract 15436: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and MACE in Women With Signs and Symptoms of Ischemia: Data From the WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation)

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Wu ◽  
Marie Lauzon ◽  
Jenna Maughan ◽  
Leslee J Shaw ◽  
Sheryl F Kelsey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Relatively high left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (>65%) in women was recently associated with higher all-cause mortality over 6 years follow-up in the CONFIRM study. We sought to evaluate high EF and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Methods: The WISE original cohort (enrolled 1996-2000) is a multicenter prospective study of women with suspected ischemic heart disease undergoing clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography. We investigated the relationship between high (>65%) and normal (55-65%) EF and MACE, defined as all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and heart failure (HF) hospitalization using Kaplan Meier (KM) and regression analyses. Results: A total of 653 women were included (298 high and 355 normal EF). Mean age was 58±11 years and mean EF was 68±7%. There was no significant difference in MACE by EF group over a 10-year follow-up period (log rank p=0.54, Figure ). When patients were stratified by the presence of obstructive CAD, MACE rates remained similar between high and normal EF. High EF was not associated with stroke or HF but had a lower MI risk (log rank p=0.03, Table ). EF was not associated with MACE in a multivariable regression model. Conclusions: Among women presenting with evidence of ischemia, there was no significant difference in MACE between high and normal EF groups. High EF was associated with a lower risk of myocardial infarction as an individual component of MACE.

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Recovery in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan

Cardiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (5) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Díez-Villanueva ◽  
Lourdes Vicent ◽  
Francisco de la Cuerda ◽  
Alberto Esteban-Fernández ◽  
Manuel Gómez-Bueno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Background: A significant number of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) experience ventricular function recovery during follow-up. We studied the variables associated with LVEF recovery in patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan (SV) in clinical practice. Methods: We analyzed data from a prospective and multicenter registry including 249 HF outpatients with reduced LVEF who started SV between October 2016 and March 2017. The patients were classified into 2 groups according to LVEF at the end of follow-up (>35%: group R, or ≤35%: group NR). Results: After a mean follow-up of 7 ± 0.1 months, 62 patients (24.8%) had LVEF >35%. They were older (71.3 ± 10.8 vs. 67.5 ± 12.1 years, p = 0.025), and suffered more often from hypertension (83.9 vs. 73.8%, p = 0.096) and higher blood pressure before and after SV (both, p < 0.01). They took more often high doses of beta-blockers (30.6 vs. 27.8%, p = 0.002), with a smaller proportion undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (14.8 vs. 29.0%, p = 0.028) and fewer implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICD; 32.8 vs. 67.9%, p < 0.001), this being the only predictive variable of NR in the multivariate analysis (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.47, p < 0.0001). At the end of follow-up, the mean LVEF in group R was 41.9 ± 8.1% (vs. 26.3 ± 4.7% in group NR, p < 0.001), with an improvement compared with the initial LVEF of 14.6 ± 10.8% (vs. 0.8 ± 4.5% in group NR, p < 0.0001). Functional class improved in both groups, mainly in group R (p = 0.035), with fewer visits to the emergency department (11.5 vs. 21.6%, p = 0.07). Conclusions: In patients with LVEF ≤35% treated with SV, not carrying an ICD was independently associated with LVEF recovery, which was related to greater improvement in functional class.

scholarly journals Reduction in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction is Associated with Subsequent Cardiac Events in Outpatients with Chronic Heart Failure

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka Okuhara ◽  
Masanori Asakura ◽  
Yoshiyuki Orihara ◽  
Daisuke Morisawa ◽  
Yuki Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractLeft ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is critical for determining the prognosis and treatment of patients with heart failure (HF). However, the influence of serial LVEF changes in patients with stable chronic HF (CHF) has not yet been completely investigated. We analyzed data of 263 outpatients with CHF from the J-MELODIC study cohort and evaluated the frequency of cardiac events. We stratified patients into tertiles based on the relative difference in LVEF in 1 year and that at baseline. We found a significant difference in the cardiac event rate among the three groups (log-rank test, p = 0.042). We identified a relative 11% LVEF reduction as the optimal cutoff value based on the receiver operating characteristics analysis. LVEF (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.07; p = 0.015) and E/e′ (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01–1.12; p = 0.023) at baseline were predictors of >11% LVEF reduction. After adjusting the variables including age and sex, >11% LVEF reduction was an independent predictor of subsequent cardiac events (HR, 5.79; 95% CI, 2.49–13.2; p < 0.001). In conclusion, patients with 1-year relative >11% LVEF reduction may have subsequent worsening outcomes. Such patients should be carefully followed-up as high risk population for development of cardiac events.

Abstract 16085: Digoxin is Associated With Increased Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Without Concomitant Heart Failure

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Tysarowski ◽  
Nigri Rafael ◽  
Hyoeun Kim ◽  
Emad Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Introduction: There is conflicting data on the effect of digoxin on all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in patients with heart failure (HF). Hypothesis: We hypothesized that in patients with AF, mortality rates associated with digoxin treatment are different among patients with HF and without HF. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of hospitalized patients with AF assessing the effects of digoxin on all-cause mortality. We divided patients into two groups: with and without HF. We performed Cox regression analysis to assess hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality depending on digoxin treatment and used propensity score matching to adjust for differences in background characteristics between treatment groups. Results: Among 2179 consecutive patients, the median age was 73 ± 14 (table), 53% patient were male, 49% had HF, 19% were discharged on digoxin. Median left ventricular ejection fraction in the cohort was 60 (IQR 40-65). Among patients with HF, 35% had preserved, 18% had mid-range and 48% had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The mean follow-up time was 3 ± 2.1 years. After adjustment, in patients with HF, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the digoxin subgroups ( A , HR=1.01 [95% CI 0.76 to 1.35], p=0.92). In contrast, after adjustment, in patients without HF there was a statistically significant increased mortality in the digoxin subgroup ( B , HR=2.23, [95% CI 1.42 to 3.51], p<0.001). Conclusions: Digoxin use was associated with increased mortality in patients with AF and without concomitant HF. This suggests that clinicians should be careful in prescribing digoxin for rate control in AF, especially in patients without concomitant HF.

P6329123-Iodine Metaiodobenzylguanitidine imaging: a useful prognostic marker of cardiovascular death in heart failure patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L I Birtolo ◽  
P Scarparo ◽  
N Salvi ◽  
V Frantellizzi ◽  
S Cimino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmias ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background According to guidelines, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is recommended in prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in heart failure (HF) patients (pts). Guidelines have several limitations because ICD indication is based mainly on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Recently, 123-iodine metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging (123-I MIBG) seems to identify, independently from LVEF, pts at high risk of SCD: heart/mediastinum (H/M) ratio<1.6 and summed score (SS)>26. Purpose The aim is to assess the role of 123-I MIBG to predict malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in HF pts Methods We enrolled 208 pts, admitted to our hospital with diagnosis of HF and LVEF≤35%, NYHA class II and III, who underwent 123-I MIBG imaging. H/M ratio of 1.6 was used as a cut-off to identify high risk (G1) versus low risk pts (G2). All pts underwent ICD implantation. Follow-up was performed at 24 months. Results 138 patients were included in G1 and 70 patients in G2. All baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups (table 1). At 24 months follow-up VA events were recorded greater in G1 compared to G2 (21% vs 10%, p=0.04). Table 1 G1 G2 P value H/M ≤1.6 (N=138) H/M >1.6 (N=70) Age (years) 65±12 63±14 0.28 Male, N (%) 108 (78) 64 (91) 0.02 Diabetes mellitus type II, N (%) 54 (39) 14 (20) 0.01 Dyslipidemia, N (%) 58 (42) 30 (42) 0.64 LVEF (%) 30±5 31±4 0.14 Ischaemic CM, N (%) 85 (62) 30 (42) 0.012 Malignant VA, N (%) 30 (21) 7 (10) 0.04 SS 38±9 16±7 0.0001 H/M: heart mediastinum ratio; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; CM: cardiomyopathy; VA: ventricular arrhythmias; SS: summed score. Conclusion Our results seem to confirm that 123-I MIBG uptake is associated with the occurrence of life-threatening VA in HF pts independently from LVEF. The use of 123-I MIBG could be a useful tool in the future to increase the specificity of the pts selection for ICD therapy.

Heart failure: preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan De Sutter ◽  
Piotr Lipiec ◽  
Christine Henri
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Exercise Induced

Nearly half of all patients with heart failure present with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFPEF). HFPEF is a pathophysiologically and clinically heterogeneous disease with an overall similar outcome to heart failure patients with a reduced ejection fraction. It is predominantly seen in elderly patients and comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, a sedentary lifestyle, and myocardial ischaemia play important roles in its development. In this chapter the conventional echocardiographic hallmarks of HFPEF including a preserved ejection fraction, left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial dilatation, diastolic dysfunction, and pulmonary hypertension are presented. For the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, it is important to keep in mind that no single echocardiographic parameter is sufficiently accurate and reproducible to be used in isolation to make a diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction. The value of newer techniques including three-dimensional echocardiography and longitudinal strain assessment for the diagnosis and follow-up of HFPEF patients are promising but require further evaluation. As exercise-induced dyspnoea may be the first manifestation of HFPEF, the role of exercise echo (or diastolic stress testing) with evaluation of exercise-induced changes in left ventricular filling pressure and pulmonary artery systolic pressure is also presented. This chapter ends with a discussion on the echocardiographic parameters that can be used for risk stratification and follow-up of HFPEF patients.

scholarly journals Erythropoietin response to anaemia in heart failure

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Montero ◽  
Thomas Haider ◽  
Andreas J Flammer
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Meta Regression

Background Despite multiple factors correlating with the high prevalence of anaemia in heart failure, the prevailing mechanisms have yet to be established. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature and determine whether low circulating haemoglobin is primarily underlain by erythropoietin resistance or defective production in heart failure. Design and methods We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE since its inception until May 2017 for articles reporting erythropoietin and haemoglobin concentrations in heart failure patients not treated with erythropoietin-stimulating agents. The primary outcome was the mean difference in observed/predicted (O/P) erythropoietin ratio between heart failure patients and normal reference values. Meta-regression analyses assessed the influence of potential moderating factors. Results Forty-one studies were included after systematic review, comprising a total of 3137 stable heart failure patients with mean age and left ventricular ejection fraction ranging from 52 years to 80 years and 21% to 59%. The O/P erythropoietin ratio was below reference values in 24 of 25 studies in anaemic heart failure patients ( n = 1094, range = 0.49–1.05), whereas only one out of 16 studies in non-anaemic heart failure patients presented a low O/P erythropoietin ratio ( n = 2043, range = 0.91–1.97). In studies comparing anaemic versus non-anaemic heart failure patients ( n = 1531), the mean O/P erythropoietin ratio was consistently reduced in anaemic heart failure patients (mean difference = –0.68, 95% confidence interval = −0.78, −0.57; p < 0.001). In meta-regression, the O/P erythropoietin ratio was negatively associated with age, female sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, inflammation and disease severity. Conclusion Anaemia in heart failure is overwhelmingly characterized by impaired erythropoietin production, which is exacerbated with age, female sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, inflammation and disease severity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document