scholarly journals Efficacy of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Intra- and Extramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110114
Author(s):  
Hiroki Ushirozako ◽  
Go Yoshida ◽  
Shiro Imagama ◽  
Kazuyoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Kei Ando ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
True Positive ◽  
True Negative ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential

Study Design: Multicenter prospective study. Objectives: Although intramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) and extramedullary SCT (EMSCT) surgeries carry high risk of intraoperative motor deficits (MDs), the benefits of transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring are well-accepted; however, comparisons have not yet been conducted. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of TcMEP monitoring during IMSCT and EMSCT resection surgeries. Methods: We prospectively reviewed TcMEP monitoring data of 81 consecutive IMSCT and 347 EMSCT patients. We compared the efficacy of interventions based on TcMEP alerts in the IMSCT and EMSCT groups. We defined our alert point as a TcMEP amplitude reduction of ≥70% from baseline. Results: In the IMSCT group, TcMEP monitoring revealed 20 true-positive (25%), 8 rescue (10%; rescue rate 29%), 10 false-positive, a false-negative, and 41 true-negative patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 80%. In the EMSCT group, TcMEP monitoring revealed 20 true-positive (6%), 24 rescue (7%; rescue rate 55%), 29 false-positive, 2 false-negative, and 263 true-negative patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 90%. The most common TcMEP alert timing was during tumor resection (96% vs. 91%), and suspension surgeries with or without intravenous steroid administration were performed as intervention techniques. Conclusions: Postoperative MD rates in IMSCT and EMSCT surgeries using TcMEP monitoring were 25% and 6%, and rescue rates were 29% and 55%. We believe that the usage of TcMEP monitoring and appropriate intervention techniques during SCT surgeries might have predicted and prevented the occurrence of intraoperative MDs.

scholarly journals False-Positive and False-Negative Results of Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Surgery for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryu Kurokawa ◽  
Phyo Kim ◽  
Kazushige Itoki ◽  
Shinji Yamamoto ◽  
Tetsuro Shingo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Intramedullary Tumors ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Unruptured Aneurysms ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity

Abstract BACKGROUND Motor evoked potential (MEP) recording is used as a method to monitor integrity of the motor system during surgery for intramedullary tumors (IMTs). Reliable sensitivity of the monitoring in predicting functional deterioration has been reported. However, we observed false positives and false negatives in our experience of 250 surgeries of IMTs. OBJECTIVE To delineate specificity and sensitivity of MEP monitoring and to elucidate its limitations and usefulness. METHODS From 2008 to 2011, 58 patients underwent 62 surgeries for IMTs. MEP monitoring was performed in 59 operations using transcranial electrical stimulation. Correlation with changes in muscle strength and locomotion was analyzed. A group undergoing clipping for unruptured aneurysms was compared for elicitation of MEP. RESULTS Of 212 muscles monitored in the 59 operations, MEP was recorded in 150 (71%). Positive MEP warnings, defined as amplitude decrease below 20% of the initial level, occurred in 37 muscles, but 22 of these (59%) did not have postoperative weakness (false positive). Positive predictive value was limited to 0.41. Of 113 muscles with no MEP warnings, 8 muscles developed postoperative weakness (false negative, 7%). Negative predictive value was 0.93. MEP responses were not elicited in 58 muscles (27%). By contrast, during clipping for unruptured aneurysms, MEP was recorded in 216 of 222 muscles (96%). CONCLUSION MEP monitoring has a limitation in predicting postoperative weakness in surgery for IMTs. False-positive and false-negative indices were abundant, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.65 and 0.83 in predicting postoperative weakness.

Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring Improves Outcome after Surgery for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors: A Historical Control Study

Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 1129-1143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Sala ◽  
Giorgio Palandri ◽  
Elisabetta Basso ◽  
Paola Lanteri ◽  
Vedran Deletis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Historical Control Group ◽  
Historical Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Control Study

Abstract OBJECTIVE: The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (INM) during intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery remains debated. This historical control study tests the hypothesis that INM monitoring improves neurological outcome. METHODS: In 50 patients operated on after September 2000, we monitored somatosensory evoked potentials and transcranially elicited epidural (D-wave) and muscle motor evoked potentials (INM group). The historical control group consisted of 50 patients selected from among 301 patients who underwent intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery, previously operated on by the same team without INM. Matching by preoperative neurological status (McCormick scale), histological findings, tumor location, and extent of removal were blind to outcome. A more than 50% somatosensory evoked potential amplitude decrement influenced only myelotomy. Muscle motor evoked potential disappearance modified surgery, but more than 50% D-wave amplitude decrement was the major indication to stop surgery. The postoperative to preoperative McCormick grade variation at discharge and at a follow-up of at least 3 months was compared between the two groups (Student's t tests). RESULTS: Follow-up McCormick grade variation in the INM group (mean, +0.28) was significantly better (P = 0.0016) than that of the historical control group (mean, –0.16). At discharge, there was a trend (P = 0.1224) toward better McCormick grade variation in the INM group (mean, –0.26) than in the historical control group (mean, –0.5). CONCLUSION: The applied motor evoked potential methods seem to improve long-term motor outcome significantly. Early motor outcome is similar because of transient motor deficits in the INM group, which can be predicted at the end of surgery by the neurophysiological profile of patients.

scholarly journals Motor-evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in a series of 100 consecutive procedures

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. E3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl F. Kothbauer ◽  
Vedran Deletis ◽  
Fred J. Epstein
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Motor Deficit ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
Intramedullary Tumors ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Motor Pathways ◽  
Evoked Potential Monitoring

Resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors carries a high risk for surgical damage to the motor pathways. This surgery is therefore optimal for testing the performance of intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. This report attempts to provide evidence for the accurate representation of patients' pre- and postoperative motor status by combined epidural and muscle MEP monitoring during intramedullary surgery. The authors used transcranial electrical motor cortex stimulation to elicit MEPs, which were recorded from the spinal cord (with an epidural electrode) and from limb target muscles (thenar, anterior tibial) with needle electrodes. The amplitude of the epidural MEPs and the presence or absence of muscle MEPs were the parameters for MEP interpretation. A retrospective analysis was performed on data from the resection of 100 consecutive intramedullary tumors and MEP data were compared with the pre- and postoperative motor status. Intraoperative monitoring was feasible in all patients without severe preoperative motor deficits. Preoperatively paraplegic patients had no recordable MEPs. The sensitivity of muscle MEPs to detect postoperative motor deficits was 100% and its specificity was 91%. There was no instance in which a patient with stable MEPs developed a motor deficit postoperatively. Intraoperative MEPs adequately represented the motor status of patients undergoing surgery for intramedullary tumors. Because deterioration of the motor status was transient in all cases, it can be considered that impairment of the functional integrity of the motor pathways was detected before permanent deficits occurred.

Surgeon-directed transcranial motor evoked potential spinal cord monitoring in spinal deformity surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (3) ◽  
pp. 547-552
Author(s):  
Ramanare Sibusiso Magampa ◽  
Robert Dunn
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Congenital Scoliosis ◽  
Spinal Cord Monitoring ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Spinal Deformity Surgery ◽  
Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential

Aims Spinal deformity surgery carries the risk of neurological injury. Neurophysiological monitoring allows early identification of intraoperative cord injury which enables early intervention resulting in a better prognosis. Although multimodal monitoring is the ideal, resource constraints make surgeon-directed intraoperative transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring a useful compromise. Our experience using surgeon-directed TcMEP is presented in terms of viability, safety, and efficacy. Methods We carried out a retrospective review of a single surgeon’s prospectively maintained database of cases in which TcMEP monitoring had been used between 2010 and 2017. The upper limbs were used as the control. A true alert was recorded when there was a 50% or more loss of amplitude from the lower limbs with maintained upper limb signals. Patients with true alerts were identified and their case history analyzed. Results Of the 299 cases reviewed, 279 (93.3%) had acceptable traces throughout and awoke with normal clinical neurological function. No patient with normal traces had a postoperative clinical neurological deficit. True alerts occurred in 20 cases (6.7%). The diagnoses of the alert group included nine cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) (45%) and six of congenital scoliosis (30%). The incidence of deterioration based on diagnosis was 9/153 (6%) for AIS, 6/30 (20%) for congenital scoliosis, and 2/16 (12.5%) for spinal tuberculosis. Deterioration was much more common in congenital scoliosis than in AIS (p = 0.020). Overall, 65% of alerts occurred during rod instrumentation: 15% occurred during decompression of the internal apex in vertebral column resection surgery. Four alert cases (20%) awoke with clinically detectable neurological compromise. Conclusion Surgeon-directed TcMEP monitoring has a 100% negative predictive value and allows early identification of physiological cord distress, thereby enabling immediate intervention. In resource constrained environments, surgeon-directed TcMEP is a viable and effective method of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring. Level of evidence: III Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):547–552.

Parotid Tumors: Fine-Needle Aspiration and/or Frozen Section

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P42-P43
Author(s):  
Peter Zbaren ◽  
Heinz Loosli ◽  
Edouard Stauffer
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Frozen Section ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
True Positive ◽  
True Negative ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Parotid Neoplasms

Objective Assess the difficulties of preoperative and intraoperative tumor typing of parotid neoplasms. Know the advantages and pitfalls of fine-needle-aspiration cytology (FNAC) and frozen section (FS) analysis in primary parotid neoplasms. Methods In 113 parotid neoplasms (70 malignancies and 43 benign tumors) preoperative FNAC as well as intraoperative FS analysis were performed. FNAC and FS findings were analyzed and compared with the final histopathologic diagnosis. Results The FNAC smear was non-diagnostic in 6 tumors. In 2 FS specimens, it was not possible to determine the tumor dignity. FNAC findings and FS findings were both available in 105 neoplasMS The FNAC findings were true positive for malignancy in 54, true negative in 36, false positive in 4, and false negative in 11 tumors. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 86%, 83%, and 90% respectively. The FS findings were true positive in 60, true negative in 38, false positive in 2, and false negative in 5 tumors. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 93%, 92% and 95% respectively. The exact histologic tumor typing by FNAC was correct, false or not mentioned in 58%, 20% and 22% true positive or true negative evaluated tumors, and by FS in 83%, 5% and 12% true positive or true negative evaluated tumors. Conclusions The current analysis showed a superiority of FS compared with FNAC regarding the diagnosis of malignancy and especially of tumor typing. FNAC alone is not prone in many cases to determine the surgical management of primary parotid carcinomas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document