Book Review: Rajat Acharyya and Saibal Kar. International Trade and Economic Development

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 288-290
Author(s):  
Meghna Dutta
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
International Trade

DEVELOPMENT OF THE WORLD MARKET OF SERVICES IN TURBULENCE CONDITIONS AND CHANGES

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larysa Nosach ◽  
◽  
Victoria Morgun ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
International Trade ◽  
Service Sector ◽  
World Market ◽  
Global Dimension ◽  
Trade In Services ◽  
Current State ◽  
The World

The author's research of the current state and features of the development of the world market for services in conditions of turbulence of world processes was carried; the world leaders of the service sector in the global dimension and leaders of the most dynamic articles of service categories were identified; the share of world exports of services by countries by the level of their economic development was justified; weaknesses in the assessment of indicators of international trade in services were identified; the research is based on UNCTAD statistics.

Economic Development and International Trade

1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 53-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashfaque H Khan ◽  
Najam Saqib
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
International Trade

Economic Development and International Trade

1989 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Zaman Zamanian ◽  
David Greenway
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
International Trade

International Trade and United States Economic Development Revisited

1961 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 384-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Macesich
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
International Trade ◽  
The United States ◽  
External Factors ◽  
Initial Disturbance ◽  
Disturbing Factor ◽  
Flow Of Funds ◽  
American Economy

Mr. Williamson's comments on my article leave the issue between us ambiguous. I welcome this opportunity further to develop my own views regarding the turbulent period of the 1830's and early 1840's.First of all, I believe that Williamson has overstated his case in attributing to me disregard of the importance of internal events in the United States. I advanced the hypothesis that the primary disturbing factor in the period 1834–1845 was an increase, and then a decrease, in the flow of funds into the United States, and the problem I wished to examine was the response in the American economy to this initial disturbance. As indicated in my article, the emphasis placed on external factors does not mean that internal events in the United States were negligible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document