scholarly journals Positive-pressure ventilation attenuates subarachnoid-pleural fistula after thoracic spinal surgery: A report of two cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949901986547
Author(s):  
Mamoru Kono ◽  
Masao Koda ◽  
Tetsuya Abe ◽  
Kousei Miura ◽  
Katsuya Nagashima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Spine ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Drainage Tube ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Dural Tear ◽  
Thoracic Spinal ◽  
Csf Leakage

Background: Dural tear and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is known to be a complication of anterior thoracic spine surgery. If dural tear occurs on the ventral side of dura in combination with a pleural injury, it potentially becomes a subarachnoid-pleural fistula. The pressure gradient permits continuous flow of CSF from the subarachnoid space into the cavum thorax, resulting in an intractable subarachnoid-pleural fistula. We report two cases of successfully treated subarachnoid-pleural fistula using noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV). Methods: Two patients, a 52-year-old man and a 54-year-old woman, underwent anterior thoracic spine surgery to treat thoracic myelopathy caused by spinal tumor and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. During surgery, dural tear and CSF leakage to the cavum thorax due to perforation of the dura was observed. We treated with polyglycolic acid sheet (Neovel®) in combination with fibrin glue; a suction drainage tube was placed at the subfascial level and the wound was drained with negative pressure. However, after removal of the drainage tube, subarachnoid-pleural fistula was proven. We applied NPPV to the patients. Results: We used the application of NPPV for 2 weeks in the first patient and 1 week in the second patient. In both of them, subarachnoid-pleural fistula was attenuated without apparent adverse events. Conclusion: NPPV is noninvasive and potentially useful therapy to attenuate subarachnoid-pleural fistula after thoracic spinal surgery.

Subarachnoid—pleural fistula treated with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation

2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Yoshor ◽  
J. Brett Gentry ◽  
Scott A. LeMaire ◽  
John Dickerson ◽  
John Saul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Intrathoracic Pressure ◽  
Pleural Space ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Csf Leakage ◽  
Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid

✓ The authors describe the case of a 24-year-old man who underwent an L-1 corpectomy for spinal decompression and stabilization following an injury that caused an L-1 burst fracture. Postoperatively, an accumulation of spinal fluid developed in the pleural space, which was refractory to 1 week of thoracostomy tube drainage and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. The authors then initiated a regimen of positive-pressure ventilation in which a bilevel positive airway pressure (PAP) mask was used. After 5 days, the CSF collection in the pleural space resolved. Use of a bilevel PAP mask represents a safe, noninvasive method of reducing the negative intrathoracic pressure that promotes CSF leakage into the pleural cavity and may be a useful adjunct in the treatment of subarachnoid—pleural fistula.

scholarly journals Comparison of outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in patients with hypoxemia and various APACHE II scores after extubation

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 175346662110042
Author(s):  
Xiaoke Shang ◽  
Yanggan Wang
Keyword(s):  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Abdominal Distension ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Subgroup Ii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Aims: The study aimed to compare and analyze the outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the treatment of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) who had extubation after weaning from mechanical ventilation. Methods: A total 120 patients with AHRF were enrolled into this study. These patients underwent tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. They were organized into two groups according to the score of Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II); group A: APACHE II score <12; group B: 12⩽ APACHE II score <24. Group A had 72 patients and patients given HFNC were randomly assigned to subgroup I while patients given NPPV were assigned to subgroup II (36 patients in each subgroup). Group B had 48 patients and patients given HFNC were randomly assigned to subgroup I while patients given NPPV were assigned to subgroup II (24 patients in each subgroup). General information, respiratory parameters, endpoint event, and comorbidities of adverse effect were compared and analyzed between the two subgroups. Results: The incidence of abdominal distension was significantly higher in patients treated with NPPV than in those treated with HFNC in group A (19.44% versus 0, p = 0.005) and group B (25% versus 0, p = 0.009). There was no significant difference between the HFNC- and NPPV-treated patients in blood pH, oxygenation index, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, respiratory rate, and blood lactic acid concentration in either group ( p > 0.05). Occurrence rate of re-intubation within 72 h of extubation was slightly, but not significantly, higher in NPPV-treated patients ( p > 0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between HFNC and NPPV in preventing respiratory failure in patients with AHRF with an APACHE II score <24 after extubation. However, HFNC was superior to NPPV with less incidence of abdominal distension. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Orbital Herniation Associated With Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation

CHEST Journal ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 841-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Lazowick ◽  
Thomas J. Meyer ◽  
Mark Pressman ◽  
Donald Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure

Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients with Respiratory Failure due to Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Respiration ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Jaber ◽  
Gérald Chanques ◽  
Mustapha Sebbane ◽  
Farida Salhi ◽  
Jean-Marc Delay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure

Comparative study between noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with respiratory failure

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed N Al Shafi'i ◽  
Doaa M. Kamal El-din ◽  
Mohammed A. Abdulnaiem Ismaiel ◽  
Hesham M Abotiba
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been increasingly used in the management of respiratory failure in intensive care unit (ICU). Aim of the Work is to compare the efficacy and resource consumption of NIPPMV delivered through face mask against invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) delivered by endotracheal tube in the management of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Patients and Methods This prospective randomized controlled study included 78 adults with acute respiratory failure who were admitted to the intensive care unit. The enrolled patients were randomly allocated to receive either noninvasive ventilation or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Results Severity of illness, measured by the simplified acute physiologic score 3 (SAPS 3), were comparable between the two patient groups with no significant difference between them. Both study groups showed a comparable steady improvement in PaO2:FiO2 values, indicating that NIPPV is as effective as CMV in improving the oxygenation of patients with ARF. The PaCO2 and pH values gradually improved in both groups during the 48 hours of ventilation. 12 hours after ventilation, NIPPMV group showed significantly more improvement in PaCO2 and pH than the CMV group. The respiratory acidosis was corrected in the NIPPV group after 24 hours of ventilation compared with 36 hours in the CMV group. NIPPV in this study was associated with a lower frequency of complications than CMV, including ventilator acquired pneumonia (VAP), sepsis, renal failure, pulmonary embolism, and pancreatitis. However, only VAP showed a statistically significant difference. Patients who underwent NIPPV in this study had lower mortality, and lower ventilation time and length of ICU stay, compared with patients on CMV. Intubation was required for less than a third of patients who initially underwent NIV. Conclusion Based on our study findings, NIPPV appears to be a potentially effective and safe therapeutic modality for managing patients with ARF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document