scholarly journals The Effect of Hamstring Muscle Tightness on Knee Joint Proprioceptive Sense

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (11_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0017
Author(s):  
Seval Tamer ◽  
Yavuz Yakut ◽  
Filiz Can ◽  
Özlem Ülger

Objectives: Hamstring muscle tightness is a major musculoskeletal problem that predisposes the knee to injury . Proprioception sense is an important factor for injuries and we have not found any studies on the effect of hamstring muscle tightness on knee joint proprioceptive . Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of hamstring muscle tightness on knee joint proprioceptive sense. Methods: 61 healthy individuals, without any orthopedic or neurological symptoms that affect the knee joint proprioception sense, were included in this study. Individuals' socio-demographic data were recorded. Hamstring muscle tightness was measured with active knee extension (ACE) method by using goniometer. Individuals with hamstring muscle tightness (ACE over of 20 °) was Group 1 and individuals without tightness (ACE 20 ° and under) was Group 2. Proprioceptive component of joint position sense and kinaesthesia was evaluated for the sense of proprioception. Prosport 1000 PMS (Tümer Machine Ankara, Turkey) instrument was used and visual, auditory, tactile, sensory input have been eliminated. Passive placement method and 20 and 40 degrees of knee flexion target angles was used for measurement. For joint position sense target angle predict degree, for kinesthesia perceive movement sense degree was recorded. Instrument moved 10 degrees/sec for joint position sense and 0.4 degrees/sec for kinesthesia. All measurements were repeated three times for dominant and non-dominant side. SPSS version 21 was used for statistical analysis and p values of 0.05 and less were considered evidence of statistically significant findings. Mann-Whitney U rank test was used to compare findings of two groups. Results: Individuals’ socio-demographic data were similar (p> 0.05). No difference was found between the groups’ dominant and non-dominant sides’ AKE values (p> 0.05). Similarly for dominant and non-dominant side kinaesthesia values in 20 °and 40°, joint position sense values in 20 ° and 40 ° did not show statistically significant differences between the groups (p> 0.05). Conclusion: This study showed that hamstring muscle tightness was not effective on knee joint kinesthesia and joint position sense for both dominant and non-dominant side. This result indicates that joint position and kinesthesia were not effective enough to show the effect of hamstring muscle tightness on knee joint proprioception, so other proprioceptive components like muscle strength, range of motion, strength and agility could be considered.

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (84) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vilma Jurevičienė ◽  
Albertas Skurvydas ◽  
Juozas Belickas ◽  
Giedra Bušmanienė ◽  
Dovilė Kielė ◽  
...  

Research  background  and  hypothesis.  Proprioception  is  important  in  the  prevention  of  injuries  as  reduced proprioception  is  one  of  the  factors  contributing  to  injury  in  the  knee  joint,  particularly  the  ACL.  Therefore, proprioception appears not only important for the prevention of ACL injuries, but also for regaining full function after ACL reconstruction.Research aim. The aim of this study was to understand how proprioception is recovered four and five months after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.Research methods. The study included 15 male subjects (age – 33.7 ± 2.49 years) who had undergone unilateral ACL reconstruction with a semitendinosus/gracilis (STG) graft in Kaunas Clinical Hospital. For proprioceptive assessment, joint position sense (JPS) was measured on both legs using an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex), at knee flexion of 60° and 70°, and at different knee angular velocities of 2°/s and 10°/s. The patients were assessed preoperatively and after 4 and 5 months, postoperatively.Research results. Our study has shown that the JPS’s (joint position sense) error scores  to a controlled active movement is significantly higher in injured ACL-deficient knee than in the contralateral knee (normal knee) before surgery and after four and five months of rehabilitation.  After 4 and 5 months of rehabilitation we found significantly lower values in injured knees compared to the preoperative data. Our study has shown that in injured knee active angle reproduction errors after 4 and 5 months of rehabilitation were higher compared with the ones of the uninjured knee. Proprioceptive ability on the both legs was  independent of all differences angles for target and starting position for movement. The knee joint position sense on both legs depends upon the rate of two different angular velocities and the mean active angle reproduction errors at the test of angular velocity slow speed was the highest compared with the fast angular velocity. Discussion and conclusions. In conclusion, our study shows that there was improvement in mean JPS 4 and 5 months after ACL reconstruction, but it did not return to normal indices.Keywords: knee joint, joint position sense, angular velocity, starting position for movement.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-240
Author(s):  
Meghan Lamers ◽  
Joanna Reeves ◽  
Razan Alshamali ◽  
Chantelle Murnaghan ◽  
Leah Bent

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document