scholarly journals Delayed Pulmonary Embolism Following Achilles Tendon Repair

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (11_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0022
Author(s):  
İlker Çolak ◽  
Engin Eceviz ◽  
Özgür Baysal ◽  
Halil İbrahim Bekler
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Heterozygous Mutation ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Dvt Prophylaxis

Objectives: It is well known that venous thromboembolism is a common complication after lower limb injuries which requires long term immobilization, however venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after achilles tendon rupture is stil controversial. In this report our aim is to present a case of pulmonary embolism which developed 47 days after surgical repair of achilles tendon rupture and diagnosed factor V leiden heterozygous mutation. Methods: Case presentation: A 28 – years- old man was admitted to emergency department with left heel pain and he could not bear weight on it. Achilles tendon rupture was confirmed with physical examination and MRI and patient operated under the spinal anesthesia. Tendon was repaired with the modified Kesler technique. Patient was cast-immobilized and ambulating with crutches and rested for 47 days at home, when he was admitted to emergency department again with acute severe dyspnea, pain on right side, hemoptysis. There was no chronic disease history in in the patient´s anamnesis except migraine diagnosis. There were slight inspiratory rales in right lower lobe in auscultation of respiratuary system examination. Cardiovascular system and abdomen examination were normal. Plasma concentration of D-dimer was 1227 μg/mL in the laboratory evaluations. Patient was diagnosed pulmonary embolus (PE) by ventilation/perfusion lung scan. Result of detailed evaluation, genetic analysis showed that patient has factor V leiden heterozygous mutation. Patient hospitalized in Department of Chest Diseases and low-molecular-weight heparin was used to treat and 5 mg orally Warfarin was used for six months. Results: Conclusion: The incidence of deep venus thrombosis (DVT) and PE after Achilles tendon rupture were highly variable in the literature. This could depend on different designs used in studies. The most recent antihrombotic guidelines suggested no DVT prophylaxis for this type injuries. Existing orthopaedic guidelines does not provide optimal DVT/PE prophylaxis for injuries under the knee requires immobilization. Further research is needed to investigate the benefits of DVT prophylaxis on patients following Achilles tendon rupture.

scholarly journals Factor V Leiden Thrombophilia in a Female Collegiate Soccer Athlete: A Case Report

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendra Erickson ◽  
Michael E. Powers
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Athletic Trainers ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Genetic Mutation ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation

Objective: To raise awareness among health care providers caring for an active population to an uncommon genetic mutation that increases the risk for a potentially fatal venous thromboembolism. Background: A 19-year-old previously healthy female collegiate soccer athlete complained of coughing and progressively decreased exercise tolerance, which were attributed to a recent illness and lack of sleep. Later that evening, she complained of dyspnea and pleuritic pain and was referred to the emergency department. Bilateral pulmonary emboli were identified with computed tomography, and a hypercoagulable panel revealed that the patient was heterozygous for the factor V Leiden mutation. Differential Diagnosis: Pneumonia, pneumothorax, pericarditis, pleuritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, pulmonary embolism. Treatment: Intravenous heparin therapy was initiated immediately in the emergency department. This was followed by inpatient anticoagulant therapy for 5 days and outpatient anticoagulant therapy for an additional 12 months. During this time, the patient was unable to participate in soccer drills or return to competition and was limited to conditioning activities due to the risk of increased bleeding time. Uniqueness: Documented cases of pulmonary embolism in a young athletic population are rare and are usually associated with genetic risk factors. Factor V Leiden is a relatively uncommon genetic mutation that dramatically increases the risk for venous thromboembolism. Although the fatality rate in this population is low, fatality is preventable if the condition is recognized early and managed properly. Conclusions: Athletes should be encouraged to communicate with their athletic trainers regarding any changes in health status or medication usage. When an athlete presents with nonspecific symptoms such as dyspnea and chest pain, athletic trainers should consider the possibility of pulmonary embolism. A high degree of suspicion results in early diagnosis and treatment and may prevent a fatal event.

scholarly journals Fatal Pulmonary Embolism following Achilles Tendon Repair: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asim M. Makhdom ◽  
Simon Garceau ◽  
Ronald Dimentberg
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Significant Source ◽  
Fatal Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Dvt Prophylaxis ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Type Of Injury

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a significant source of morbidity in orthopaedic surgery. It can progress to a pulmonary embolism, a significant source of mortality. Up to date, patients with Achilles tendon rupture routinely do not receive DVT chemical prophylaxis. We are presenting a case of fatal pulmonary embolism after a surgically treated Achilles tendon rupture in a forty-two-year-old male healthy patient. In the current body of the literature, the reported incidence of DVT after Achilles tendon rupture is highly variable ranging from less than 1% to 34%, and there is a disagreement in the international guidelines regarding the need of chemical DVT prophylaxis with this type of injury. Further research needs to be conducted to investigate the risks and benefits of chemical DVT prophylaxis following Achilles tendon rupture. For low-risk patients, the use of milder forms of prophylaxis such as aspirin should also be explored.

scholarly journals Influence of Thrombophilia on the Efficacy of Dabigatran Versus Warfarin for the Extended Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in RE-MEDY™

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1544-1544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Schulman ◽  
Henry Eriksson ◽  
Samuel Z. Goldhaber ◽  
Ajay Kakkar ◽  
Clive Kearon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Total Study Population ◽  
Extended Treatment ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
Bayer Healthcare

Abstract Background: Dabigatran etexilate (DE) was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), with a lower risk of bleeding, when administered as extended treatment for VTE in the RE-MEDY™ study (in which we evaluated long-term extension of treatment with dabigatran compared with warfarin). Objectives: Thrombophilia is a major risk factor for VTE recurrence. Therefore, we performed a post-hocsubgroup analysis on data from RE-MEDY™ to investigate the efficacy of DE versus warfarin in patients with and without thrombophilia (congenital or acquired) at baseline. Methods: Patients were aged ≥ 18 years and had objectively-confirmed, symptomatic, proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (PE) that had been treated with an approved anticoagulant for 3–12 months, or with DE in one of two clinical trials of treatment for acute VTE (RE-COVER™ or RE-COVER™ II). Eligible patients were those at increased risk for recurrent VTE. Patients were randomly allocated to receive DE 150 mg twice daily or warfarin (international normalized ratio range 2.0–3.0) for 6–36 months. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent, symptomatic, objectively-confirmed VTE or VTE-related death from randomization up to the end of the planned treatment period (6–36 months). No thrombophilia workup was required for enrollment in the trial. Results: Overall, 262/1430 (18.3%) patients randomized to DE and 263/1426 (18.4%) randomized to warfarin had thrombophilia identified at baseline. Factor V Leiden thrombophilia was the most common type (Table). The frequencies of VTE/VTE-related deaths, and of PE, in patients with and without thrombophilia are shown in the Table. Treatment efficacy (DE versus warfarin) was not significantly affected by the presence of thrombophilia. Table DE (n = 1430) Warfarin (n = 1426) Thrombophilia, n (%) No 433 (30.3) 407 (28.5) Yes 262 (18.3) 263 (18.4) Factor V Leiden 131 (9.2) 137 (9.6) Prothrombin mutation 35 (2.4) 28 (2.0) Antithrombin deficiency 11 (0.8) 11 (0.8) Protein C/S deficiencies 25 (1.7) 29 (2.0) Antiphospholipid antibodies and/or lupus anticoagulants 38 (2.7) 54 (3.8) Not tested 735 (51.4) 756 (53.0) VTE/VTE-related deaths, n/N (%) Pulmonary embolism, n/N (%) DE Warfarin DE Warfarin Thrombophilia No 10/433 (2.3) 3/407 (0.7) 3/433 (0.7) 1/407 (0.2) Yes 4/262 (1.5) 6/263 (2.3) 3/262 (1.1) 2/263 (0.8) Not tested 12/735 (1.6) 9/756 (1.2) 4/735 (0.5) 2/756 (0.3) Total study population: Hazard ratio (DE vs warfarin) (95% confidence interval) 1.43 (0.78, 2.61) 1.97 (0.67, 5.76) Treatment (DE vs warfarin) by thrombophilia interaction p = 0.2277 p = 0.9003 p-value from Chi-square test for overall factor effect. Full analysis set. Conclusions: The frequencies of VTE/VTE-related death, and of PE, were similar for DE and warfarin in patients with thrombophilia who were receiving extended treatment for VTE. Treatment efficacy was not affected by the presence of thrombophilia. Disclosures Schulman: Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Eriksson:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Goldhaber:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Daiichi: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy. Kakkar:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kearon:Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada): Consultancy. Schellong:Boehringer Ingelheim: advisory boards Other, Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Healthcare: advisory boards, advisory boards Other, Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: advisory boards, advisory boards Other, Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Honoraria. Feuring:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Friedman:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy. Kreuzer:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism for Inherited Thrombophilia Disorders

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5007-5007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali McBride ◽  
Reem Diri ◽  
Ravitharan Krishnadasan ◽  
Pavani Chalasani ◽  
Ivo Abraham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Inherited Thrombophilia ◽  
Dvt Prophylaxis ◽  
Prothrombin Gene ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism can be classified according to the presence of either environmental or genetic risk factors. Risk factors for thrombosis can include activated protein C resistance, and heritable including deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S. Factor V Leiden deficiency and prothrombin gene mutations are some of the more common thrombophilias, with a slight increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current guidelines suggest the use of low-molecular weight heparins for secondary prophylaxis in patients with VTE. However, there is a lack of data on the use of Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOACs) in patients with inherited thrombophilia. We evaluated our use of rivaroxaban in patients with thrombophilia disorders treated for secondary DVT prophylaxis. Method We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients in our institution with inherited thrombophilia with an active VTE diagnosis who received DOACs for secondary prophylaxis from November 2013 until April 2016. Data collected included patient demographics, inherited thrombophilia mutation, previous history of VTE, prior treatments, and efficacy and safety of anticoagulation with DOACs. Results We had 13 patients with inherited thrombophilia mutation and 4 patients diagnosed with concomitant cancer (non-Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, and 2 with breast cancer) (Table 1). Out of 13 patients 3 failed warfarin, and one failed fondaparinux prior to switching to a DOAC. Mutation with heterozygous Factor V Leiden deficiency was reported in 7 patients, while mutations with Protein C and/or S deficiency were found in 4 patients. One patient had both Factor V Leiden and Protein C deficiency mutations. The prothrombin gene mutation was identified in one patient. The median of length of therapy was 2 years with 8/13 still on rivaroxaban in April 2016. The shortest treatment duration was 41 days for a patient who failed rivaroxaban with a second clot and was switched to apixaban without subsequent treatment failure. Two patients experienced 4 non-major episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding, nose bleeding and dark stool. One patient developed rash with noted bruising during their rivaroxaban therapy. Conclusion: This is the first report on outcomes for secondary DVT prophylaxis with DOACs in patients with underlying thrombophilia mutations. Safety and efficacy of DOACs for secondary VTE prophylaxis yielded favorable results; however, future prospective studies in the setting of thrombophilia are warranted. Table 1 Summary of baseline characteristics and outcomes. Table 1. Summary of baseline characteristics and outcomes. Disclosures McBride: Sanofi: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Risk Factor Profiles in Patients with Different Clinical Manifestations of Venous Thromboembolism: A Focus on the Factor V Leiden Mutation

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (04) ◽  
pp. 510-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bert Manten ◽  
Rudi G J Westendorp ◽  
Ted Koster ◽  
Pieter H Reitsma ◽  
Frits R Rosendaal
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Deep Vein

Summary Background. Patients with venous thromboembolic disease may present with different clinical manifestations. Factor V Leiden mutation leading to resistance to activated protein C is associated with a sevenfold increased risk for presenting with deep-vein thrombosis. It is not yet established whether carriers of the mutation have a similarly increased risk for manifesting with pulmonary embolism. Methods. From an Anticoagulation Clinic monitoring coumarin therapy, a consecutive series of patients with a first thromboembolic event (objectively proven by current radiological methods) were enrolled. All patients were interviewed and blood was drawn for geno-typing. From the hospital charts and the personal interview, information was obtained on acquired risk factors and the signs and symptoms on hospital admission. Results. 45 patients presented with symptoms of pulmonary embolism only, 211 had only symptoms of deep-vein thrombosis whereas 23 had clinical features of both. In about half of the patients acquired risk factors for venous thromboembolism were present which did not differ between the three groups of patients. Recent surgery had been performed more often in patients presenting with pulmonary embolism than in other patients (33.3% vs. 18.5%, p <0,05). Factor V Leiden was present in 9% of the patients presenting with pulmonary embolism (relative risk: 3.3 95% Cl: 1.0-10.6) and 17% of the patients presenting with deep-vein thrombosis (relative risk: 6.9 95% Cl: 3.6-12.8). The prevalence of factor V Leiden was intermediate in patients with both clinical characteristics. Conclusion. These data suggest that patients with venous thromboembolism have different clinical presentation depending on the risk factor profile. Factor V Leiden may preferentially lead to manifest deep-vein thrombosis. Differences in structure of venous thrombi could underlie differences in embolic tendency.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document