scholarly journals ISAKOS Classification of Meniscal Tears. Intra and Interobserver Reliability.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (12_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0023
Author(s):  
Mariano J. Fresneda ◽  
Juan J. Dere ◽  
Carlos H. Yacuzzi ◽  
Matías Costa Paz
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Knee Surgery ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Meniscal Lesions ◽  
Good Agreement

Objectives: To analyze the intra and interobserverreliability of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) classification of meniscal tears. Methods: Thearthroscopic classification of meniscal lesions created by the ISAKOS was used. Thirty one arthroscopic videos, made between June and December 2013,with different meniscal tear characteristics were analyzedby three orthopedic surgeons (two specialists in knee surgery and a fellowship), twice at an interval of 30 days. The Kappa Coefficients (k) was used to assess the intraobserver reliability and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interobserverreliability. Results: The averageintraobserver reliability was for the first observer 51%, the second 65% and the third 58%, reaching moderate agreement according to the Kappa coefficient used by Landis and Koch. Regarding interobserver reliability, good agreement (ICC = 0.71) was obtained as the intraclass correlation coefficient. The whole results were significantlystatical (p <0.05). Conclusion: While this classification provides a detailed description of meniscal lesions, the intraobserver reliability did not reach the optimum values obtained despite having on average a moderate agreement. However interobserver reliability results showed on average 70% of agreement (good agreement), which can affirm that the agreement and interobserver reliability is acceptable.

scholarly journals Comparison of Reliability of Norberg Angle and Distraction Index as Measurements for Hip Laxity in Dogs

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (04) ◽  
pp. 274-278
Author(s):  
Julius Klever ◽  
Andreas Brühschwein ◽  
Silvia Wagner ◽  
Sven Reese ◽  
Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Hip Joint ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Joint Laxity ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Level Of Experience ◽  
Norberg Angle

Abstract Objective The main purpose of the study was to compare reliability of measurements for the evaluation of hip joint laxity in 59 dogs. Materials and Methods Measurement of the distraction index (DI) of the PennHIP method and the Norberg angle (NA) of the Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) scoring scheme as well as scoring according to the FCI scheme and the Swiss scoring scheme were performed by three observers at different level of experience. For each dog, two radiographs were acquired with each method by the same operator to evaluate intraoperator-reliability. Results Intraoperator-reliability was slightly better for the NA compared with the DI with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.962 and 0.892 respectively. The ICC showed excellent results in intraobserver-reliability and interobserver-reliability for both the NA (ICC 0.975; 0.969) and the DI (ICC 0.986; 0.972). Thus, the NA as well as the DI can be considered as reliable measurements. The FCI scheme and the Swiss scoring scheme provide similar reliability. While the FCI scheme seems to be slightly more reliable in experienced observers (Kappa FCI 0.687; Kappa Swiss 0.681), the Swiss scoring scheme had a noticeable better reliability for the unexperienced observer (Kappa FCI 0.465; Kappa Swiss 0.514). Clinical Significance The Swiss scoring scheme provides a structured guideline for the interpretation of hip radiographs and can thus be recommended to unexperienced observers.

scholarly journals Biomechanical Measurement of Rabbit Cornea by a Modified Scheimpflug Device

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Jianjun Gu ◽  
Xiaoxiao Zhang ◽  
Bin Yang ◽  
Zheng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bulk Modulus ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Anterior Segment ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Rabbit Cornea ◽  
Deformation Response ◽  
Biomechanical Measurements ◽  
Biomechanical Measurement

Purpose. To explore the probability and variation in biomechanical measurements of rabbit cornea by a modified Scheimpflug device.Methods. A modified Scheimpflug device was developed by imaging anterior segment of the model imitating the intact eye at various posterior pressures. The eight isolated rabbit corneas were mounted on the Barron artificial chamber and images of the anterior segment were taken at posterior pressures of 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75 mmHg by the device. The repeatability and reliability of the parameters including CCT, ACD, ACV, and CV were evaluated at each posterior pressure. All the variations of the parameters at the different posterior pressures were calculated.Results. All parameters showed good intraobserver reliability (Cronbach’s alpha; intraclass correlation coefficient,α, ICC > 0.96) and repeatability in the modified Scheimpflug device. With the increase of posterior pressures, the ratio of CCT decreased linearly and the bulk modulus gradually reduced to a platform. The increase of ACD was almost linear with the posterior pressures elevated.Conclusions. The modified Scheimpflug device was a valuable tool to investigate the biomechanics of the cornea. The posterior pressure 15–75 mmHg range produced small viscoelastic deformations and nearly linear pressure-deformation response in the rabbit cornea.

scholarly journals The Evaluation of Trochlear Osseous Morphology: An Epidemiologic Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0044
Author(s):  
Sercan Yalçin ◽  
Gabriel Onor ◽  
Scott Kaar ◽  
lee Pace ◽  
Paolo Ferrua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Normal Population ◽  
Trochlear Dysplasia ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Epidemiologic Study ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Severe Dysplasia ◽  
Mild Dysplasia ◽  
Study Population

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of the trochlear dysplasia in our study population. Methods: We obtained 692 skeletally mature femoral specimens from the [Blinded Institution], [Blinded Collection]. Five observers were asked to evaluate each specimen for trochlear dysplasia on a scale between 0 and 3 (0 – normal/no dysplasia; 1 – mild dysplasia; 2 – moderate dysplasia; 3 – severe dysplasia). Each observer made initial evaluations for interobserver reliability. Each observer then re-evaluated each specimen one month later to determine intraobserver reliability. We evaluated inter and intraobserver reliability utilizing intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). All statistics were performed with SPSS v.25 (IBM, USA). Results: The interobserver ICC of first and second evaluation of all observers were found to be 0.906 [0.894-0,916] and 0.904 [0.892-0.915], respectively. The intraobserver ICC of observers were as follows: Reviewer1: 0.799 [0.771-0.825]; Reviewer2: 0.686 [0.645-0.724]; Reviewer3: 0.808 [0.781-0.832]; Reviewer4: 0.787 [0.757-0.814]; Reviewer5: 0.778 [0.747-0.806]. These results show intra and interobserver correlation was good to excellent. The percentages of normal trochlea, mild dysplasia, moderate dysplasia and severe dysplasia for first evaluation, by reviewer, are as follows: Reviewer 1: 82.7%, 12.1%, 4.0%, 1.2%; Reviewer 2: 37.3%, 26.2%, 27.5%, 9.1%; Reviewer 3: 57.9%, 28.0%, 12.1%, 1.9%; Reviewer 4: 64.2%, 25.6%, 7.7%, 2.6%; Reviewer 5: 65.6%, 14.9%, 12.3%, 7.2%. The percentages of normal trochlea, mild dysplasia, moderate dysplasia and severe dysplasia for second evaluation, by reviewer, are as follows: Reviewer 1: 78.8%, 16.6%, 3.6%, 1.0%; Reviewer 2: 40.3%, 26.4%, 23.3%, 10.0%; Reviewer 3: 42.2%,35.1%, 18.8%, 3.9%; Reviewer 4: 57.4%, 31.9%, 8.2%, 2.5%; Reviewer 5: 73.7%, 8.2%, 9.7%, 8.4%. In total, the percentages of normal trochlea, mild dysplasia, moderate dysplasia and severe dysplasia were 60.00%, 22.51%, 12.72%, 4.77%; respectively. Conclusions: This study shows that although there was no absolute criteria to grade trochlear dysplasia, observers had similar opinions on the degree of dysplasia. Also, our cohort shows that moderate to severe dysplasia is not uncommon as it is present in around 17% of knees in our cohort. This is the first epidemiologic study evaluating the prevalence of trochlear dysplasia in the normal population.

scholarly journals The reliability of Cavalier’s principle of stereological method in determining volumes of enchondromas using the computerized tomography tools

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949901668450
Author(s):  
Nihat Acar ◽  
Ahmet Karakasli ◽  
Ahmet Karaarslan ◽  
Nermin NG Mas ◽  
Onur Hapa
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Computerized Tomography ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Measurement Technique ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Benign Tumors ◽  
Volumetric Measurement

Introduction: Volumetric measurements of benign tumors enable surgeons to trace volume changes during follow-up periods. For a volumetric measurement technique to be applicable, it should be easy, rapid, and inexpensive and should carry a high interobserver reliability. We aimed to assess the interobserver reliability of a volumetric measurement technique using the Cavalier’s principle of stereological methods. Materials and methods: The computerized tomography (CT) of 15 patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of enchondroma with variant tumor sizes and localizations was retrospectively reviewed for interobserver reliability evaluation of the volumetric stereological measurement with the Cavalier’s principle, V = t × [((SU) × d) /SL]2 × Σ P. Results: The volumes of the 15 tumors collected by the observers are demonstrated in Table 1. There was no statistical significance between the first and second observers ( p = 0.000 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.970) and between the first and third observers ( p = 0.000 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.981). No statistical significance was detected between the second and third observers ( p = 0.000 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.976). Conclusion: The Cavalier’s principle with the stereological technique using the CT scans is an easy, rapid, and inexpensive technique in volumetric evaluation of enchondromas with a trustable interobserver reliability.

scholarly journals Visual versus automatic ultrasound scoring of lung B-lines: reliability and consistency between systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Short ◽  
Carlos Acebes ◽  
Guido Rodriguez-de-Lema ◽  
Giuliana Maria Concetta La Paglia ◽  
Maria Pavón ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Automatic System ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Counting System ◽  
Observer Reliability ◽  
Automatic Counting ◽  
B Lines

Aims. To evaluate the agreement between a visual and an automatic counting system of lung B-lines by ultrasound (US) as well as to test the inter- and intra-observer reliability of both systems in patients with lung diseases.Material and methods. We included four patients with different lung conditions. Four ultrasonographers expert in lung US blindly, independently and consecutively performed, in two rounds, a US B-mode assessment of 8 lung intercostal spaces of each patient. Each US assessment consisted of a visual and an automatic counting of B-lines.Results. Agreement between visual and automatic counting of B-lines was good to excellent [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.79-0.84, p<0.001]. Intra-observer reliability was good to excellent [ICC 0.62-0.99, p<0.001] except for one investigator in whom it was close to moderate for the automatic system [ICC 0.49, p<0.05]. Inter-observer reliability was excellent for both systems in both rounds [ICC 0.86-0.90, p<0.001].Conclusions. US automatic counting was consistent with US visual counting of lung B-lines, as performed by experts in the field. Both systems showed a high intra- and interobserver reliability.

Abstract 173: Coronary artery aneurysm measurement and z-score variability in Kawasaki Disease

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 131 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Ronai ◽  
Akiko Hamaoka-Okamoto ◽  
Christian Stopp ◽  
Jane W Newburger ◽  
Kevin Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Kawasaki Disease ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Z Scores

Background: Coronary artery (CA) z-scores are commonly used for clinical decisions in Kawasaki disease (KD). We evaluated reliability in CA measurement, reproducibility of z-score calculation, and frequency with which different z-score formulas lead to divergent management strategies. Methods: We randomly selected 21 KD patients (pts) with ≥1 CA z-score 1.5-3 and all KD pts with ≥ 1 CA z-score 7-14 (n=20). Two echocardiographers measured LMCA, LAD and RCA. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were calculated. T-tests were used to compare CA z-score using 3 commonly used formulas (Boston, DC and Montreal). Results: Median age at KD echo was 1.2 y (0.2-11.5 y). Interobserver reliability was high for LAD (intraclass correlation [ICC] 0.970) and RCA (ICC 0.943) and lower for LMCA (ICC 0.725). Intraobserver reliability was also high for LAD and RCA (ICC 0.991 and 0.999) and lower for LMCA (ICC 0.946). Z-scores for the 3 formulas were similar at smaller CA size, i.e., z < 3, but varied markedly at larger CA dimensions (Figure). Z-scores for the same CA dimension calculated by each of the 3 formulas resulted in disparate classification of normal vs. mild dilation in 7/21 (22%) pts, and different guidance for anticoagulation based on CA z ≥10 in 10/20 (50%) pts. Conclusion: Although CA measurements have high inter- and intraobserver agreement, CA z-scores vary dramatically based on the z-score formula, particularly at larger CA dimensions. Discrepancies in CA z-score between calculators impacts not only the distinction between normal and mild dilatation, but most importantly, the recommendation of anticoagulation for pts with larger CA dimensions.

scholarly journals Reliability of CBCT in the diagnosis of dental asymmetry

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas ◽  
Leonardo Koerich ◽  
Carolina Baratieri ◽  
Claudia Trindade Mattos ◽  
Matheus Alves Junior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Measurement Errors ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
The Mean

Objective: The aim of this study was to validate a method used to assess dental asymmetry, in relation to the skeletal midline, by means of CBCT. Methods: Ten patients who had CBCT scans taken were randomly selected for this study. Five different observers repeated 10 landmarks (x, y and z variables for each) and 12 linear measurements within 10 days. Measurements were taken in both arches to evaluate symmetry of first molars, canines and dental midline in relation to the skeletal midline. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was carried out to assess intra- and interobserver reliability for landmarks and distances. Average mean difference was also assessed to check measurement errors between observers. Results: ICC landmarks was ≥ 0.9 for 27 (90%) and 25 (83%) variables for intra- and interobserver, respectively. ICC for distances was ≥ 0.9 for 7 (58%) and 5 (42%), respectively. All ICC landmarks for distances were >0.75 for both intra- and interobserver. The mean difference between observers was ≤ 0.6 mm for all the distances. Conclusion: The method used to assess dental asymmetry by means of CBCT is valid. Measurements of molars, canines and dental midline symmetry with the skeletal midline are reproducible and reliable when taken by means of CBCT and by different operators.

Observer Reliability in Ankle Radiographic Measurements

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 324-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Brage ◽  
Craig R. Bennett ◽  
Jon B. Whitehurst ◽  
Patrick J. Getty ◽  
Alicia Toledano
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Medial Malleolus ◽  
Observer Reliability ◽  
Clear Space ◽  
Posterior Malleolus ◽  
Radiographic Measurements ◽  
Angular Measurements

We analyzed 50 sets of ankle radiographs to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability when obtaining common linear and angular measurements. The radiographs were divided into two groups: one group included 25 normal ankles, and the second group included 25 fractured ankles. Each set of radiographs was evaluated independently by four different observers on two separate occasions under controlled conditions. Six radiographic parameters were measured on all 50 sets of films: syndesmosis A, syndesmosis B, syndesmosis C, the medial clear space, and the talocrural and bimalleolar angles. On the 25 sets of fracture films, four additional measurements of fracture displacement were included: displacement of the medial malleolus (mortise), displacement of the lateral malleolus (AP and lateral), and displacement of the posterior malleolus. Reliability was evaluated with an analysis of variance intraclass correlation coefficient. Among the examiners, 9 of the 10 parameters could be measured reliably. Intraobserver reliability was found to increase with the experience of the examiner.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document