scholarly journals Is the present classification of discoid meniscus sufficient?

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0004
Author(s):  
Hasan Bombaci ◽  
Fatma Gökel ◽  
Emrah Geçgel ◽  
Suavi Aydoğmuş
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Partial Meniscectomy ◽  
Posterior Horn ◽  
Anterior Horn ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Discoid Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Popliteus Tendon ◽  
Discoid Meniscus ◽  
The Stability

Introduction: Although uncommon, the discoid meniscus is quite prone to injury due to its abnormal shape and abnormal histology. The weak or absent peripheral attachment of the discoid meniscus causes instability even after partial meniscectomy. Therefore, recently, after resection of the central part of the meniscus, in which tears develop most frequently, the remnant of the meniscus is preferred to repair. In that time, the Watanabe classification, which classifies the discoid meniscuses in three groups, is used to plan treatment. However, discoid meniscus can develop in the different forms from these three main shapes. In the present study we aimed to analyse the discoid meniscuses, which we encountered during arthroscopic procedures in the knee, according to Watanabe classification. Patients and methods: The lateral discoid meniscuses in the 36 knees of 35 patients, who were operated on because of meniscus tear of either the discoid lateral meniscus itself or the normal medial meniscus, were classified according to Watanabe classification. Results: While the lateral discoid meniscuses were classified as “complete” in 13, “incomplete” in 15 knees, the meniscuses were very thin or absent in the central (one knee) or in the postero-lateral regions (seven knees) of discoid meniscus ( Figure 1 ). In this series this opening was next to the popliteus tendon except in one case. In these cases, the continuity of the meniscus between middle and posterior horn frequently was not possible after central partial meniscectomy (CPM). On the other hand, posterior horn has stable peripheral attachment unlike the Wrisberg type discoid meniscus. Of the 36 discoid meniscuses, CPM was performed in 21 knees, CPM with anterior horn repair in three, CPM with posterior horn repair in one and anterior horn repair without meniscectomy in two patients. In nine patients the lateral discoid meniscus was left alone. [Figure: see text] Discussion and conclusion: When meniscus sparing methods are intended to perform, both to decide the amount of resection and repair of the remnant, besides the shape of meniscus tear, the stability of discoid meniscus is crucial. This study shows that the Watanabe classification cannot be sufficient to include some specific type of lateral discoid meniscus. We believe that to add the discoid meniscuses, with opening in postero-lateral region next to the popliteus tendon, to the Watanabe classification might be useful to decide the amount of resection or repair of the discoid lateral meniscus.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair of Tear of the Anterior Horn of Discoid Lateral Meniscus

2019 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. e35-e37
Author(s):  
Moganadass Muniandy ◽  
Sivalingam Rajagopal ◽  
Siti Tahir
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Adolescent Girl ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Anterior Horn ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Discoid Lateral Meniscus

AbstractThe anterior horn of lateral meniscus tear is usually repaired using outside-in technique. Although easy to perform, it was associated with several complications which may alter the outcome of the surgery. Here, we present a case of an adolescent girl presented with incomplete discoid lateral meniscus accompanied by tear of anterior horn. The tear was repaired using all-inside technique without any implants. We described the surgical technique and discussed the rationale.

MENISCAL ABNORMALITIES: DISCOID MENISCUS

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 1230001
Author(s):  
Vivek Pandey ◽  
Simon Nurettin van Laarhoven ◽  
Kiran K. V. Acharya ◽  
Sharath K. Rao ◽  
Sripathi Rao
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Plain Radiograph ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Partial Meniscectomy ◽  
Discoid Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Discoid Meniscus ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Ring Type

The discoid meniscus is the most common meniscal variant. The likely etiology being congenital, the condition usually affects the lateral meniscus. Poorly vascularized, thicker and unstable, the discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is more prone to tears due to abnormal shearing forces. Watanabe et al. (1979) classified the discoid lateral meniscus into three types: Complete, incomplete and Wrisberg type; Monllau et al. (1998) added the ring type as the fourth variant. Pain and clicks/thud are the most common presentations. Plain radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging are helpful in confirming the diagnosis. Asymptomatic DLM is best left alone. For symptomatic complete and incomplete types, partial arthroscopic saucerization is the treatment of choice leaving behind a stable rim. The Wrisberg type needs peripheral stabilization with resection of excess rim, if any. Total meniscectomy should be avoided unless inevitable. Short term results after partial meniscectomy are good.

scholarly journals OUTCOMES OF DISCOID MENISCUS REPAIRS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0003
Author(s):  
Crystal Perkins ◽  
Michael Busch ◽  
Melissa Christino ◽  
S. Clifton Willimon
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Discoid Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Discoid Meniscus ◽  
Tear Pattern ◽  
Reoperation Rates ◽  
Meniscus Surgery

Background: Discoid meniscus tear patterns vary, but typically involve horizontal cleavage tears of the central discoid component with or without anterior or posterior meniscocapsular tears. Classically, the central discoid component is saucerized and meniscocapsular tears are repaired. Recent data suggests that meniscal preservation provides long-term benefits over resection1-2. However, many meniscal transplants are performed secondary to unsalvaged or unsalvageable discoid meniscus tears3. Reoperation rates after meniscus repairs vary greatly4-6, with some series reporting high rates of reinjury and reoperation, but there are no large series of pediatric discoid meniscus repairs in the literature. The purpose of this study is to describe the outcomes of meniscus repair and saucerization in pediatric patients with symptomatic discoid menisci. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed of consecutive pediatric patients with surgical treatment of a discoid meniscus tear over a five-year period. Inclusion criteria were age less than 18 years, a symptomatic torn discoid meniscus treated with knee arthroscopy with meniscus repair, and minimum 4-month follow-up. A chart review was performed to describe tear location, tear pattern, and repair type (inside-out, outside-in, all-inside, and hybrid). Hybrid repair constructs were defined as those that used 2 or more repair types. The primary outcome was revision meniscus surgery. Results: Forty-four patients were identified to meet inclusion criteria. There were 23 males and 21 females with a mean age of 12.4 years (range 5 – 17 years). The right knee was affected in 61% of patients. The lateral meniscus was involved in all patients. Tear patterns included anterior meniscocapsular (19 patients, 43%), posterior meniscocapsular (14 patients, 30%), radial (7 patients, 16%), and bucket-handle (5 patients, 11%). Tears most commonly involved the posterior horn and body (21 patients, 48%) or posterior horn (16 patients, 36%) Arthroscopic meniscus repair was performed in all patients. Forty-three patients (98%) also underwent saucerization. Marrow stimulation, as a biological approach to improve repair healing, was performed in 14 patients (32%). The distribution of repair types and number of sutures for each type is listed in the table below. Mean follow-up was 19 months (range 4 – 70 months). Four patients (9%) underwent revision meniscus surgery following the primary repair, including 2 all-inside repairs and 2 partial meniscectomies. There were no statistically significant differences between patients who did or did not require a secondary surgery with respect to sex, age, tear location, tear pattern, repair type, or number of sutures. During follow-up, 9 patients (20%) had surgery for a symptomatic discoid meniscus in the contralateral knee. Conclusions: Saucerization and repair of discoid lateral meniscus tears in the pediatric population have good outcomes with low rates of reoperation. Appropriate saucerization, followed by an arthroscopic assessment of stability and tear patterns is critical to successful treatment of symptomatic discoid menisci. If tissue quality permits, meniscal preservation should be considered in all patients to avoid the consequences of subtotal meniscectomy. [Table: see text] Manzione M, Pizzutillo PD, Peoples AB, et al. Meniscectomy in children: a long-term follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 1983;11:111-115. Ahn JH, Kim KI, Wang JH, et al. Long-term results of arthroscopic reshaping for symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus in children. Arthroscopy 2015;31(5):867-873. Kocher MS, Tepolt FA, Vavken P. Meniscus transplantation in skeletally immature patients. J Pediatr Orthop B 2016;25(4)343-348. Steadman JR, Matheny LM, Singleton SB, et al. Meniscus suture repair: minimum 10-year outcomes in patients younger than 40 years compared with patients 40 and older. Am J Sports Med 2015;43(9):2222-2227. Paxton ES, Stock MV, Brophy RH. Meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy: a systematic review comparing reoperation rates and clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy 2011;27(9):1275-1288. Shieh AK, Edmonds EW, Pennock AT. Revision meniscal surgery in children and adolescents: risk factors and mechanisms for failure and subsequent management. Am J Sports Med 2016;44(4):838-843.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Discoid Meniscus Repairs in Children and Adolescents

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0033
Author(s):  
Crystal A. Perkins ◽  
Michael T. Busch ◽  
Melissa A. Christino ◽  
S. Clifton Willimon
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Posterior Horn ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Discoid Meniscus ◽  
Tear Pattern ◽  
Meniscus Surgery

Objectives: Discoid meniscus tear patterns vary, but typically involve horizontal cleavage tears of the central discoid component with or without anterior or posterior meniscocapsular tears. Classically, the central discoid component is saucerized and meniscocapsular tears are repaired. Recent data suggests that meniscal preservation provides long-term benefits over resection1-2. However, many meniscal transplants are performed secondary to unsalvaged or unsalvageable discoid meniscus tears3. Reoperation rates after meniscus repairs vary greatly4-6, with some series reporting high rates of reinjury and reoperation, but there are no large series of pediatric discoid meniscus repairs in the literature. The purpose of this study is to describe the outcomes of meniscus repair and saucerization in pediatric patients with symptomatic discoid menisci. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed of consecutive pediatric patients with surgical treatment of a discoid meniscus tear over a five-year period. Inclusion criteria were age less than 18 years, a symptomatic torn discoid meniscus treated with knee arthroscopy with meniscus repair, and minimum 4-month follow-up. A chart review was performed to describe tear location, tear pattern, and repair type (inside-out, outside-in, all-inside, and hybrid). Hybrid repair constructs were defined as those that used 2 or more repair types. The primary outcome was revision meniscus surgery. Results: Forty-four patients were identified to meet inclusion criteria. There were 23 males and 21 females with a mean age of 12.4 years (range 5 - 17 years). The right knee was affected in 61% of patients. The lateral meniscus was involved in all patients. Tear patterns included anterior meniscocapsular (19 patients, 43%), posterior meniscocapsular (14 patients, 30%), radial (7 patients, 16%), and bucket-handle (5 patients, 11%). Tears most commonly involved the posterior horn and body (21 patients, 48%) or posterior horn (16 patients, 36%) Arthroscopic meniscus repair was performed in all patients. Forty-three patients (98%) also underwent saucerization. Marrow stimulation, as a biological approach to improve repair healing, was performed in 14 patients (32%). The distribution of repair types and number of sutures for each type is listed in the table below. Mean follow-up was 19 months (range 4 - 70 months). Four patients (9%) underwent revision meniscus surgery following the primary repair, including 2 all-inside repairs and 2 partial meniscectomies. There were no statistically significant differences between patients who did or did not require a secondary surgery with respect to sex, age, tear location, tear pattern, repair type, or number of sutures. During follow-up, 9 patients (20%) had surgery for a symptomatic discoid meniscus in the contralateral knee. Conclusion: Saucerization and repair of discoid lateral meniscus tears in the pediatric population have good outcomes with low rates of reoperation. Appropriate saucerization, followed by an arthroscopic assessment of stability and tear patterns is critical to successful treatment of symptomatic discoid menisci. If tissue quality permits, meniscal preservation should be considered in all patients to avoid the consequences of subtotal meniscectomy. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Turner’s syndrome associated with discoid lateral meniscus and Blount’s disease: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsunemasa Kita ◽  
Takuya Tajima ◽  
Etsuo Chosa
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Left Knee ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Discoid Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Turner's Syndrome ◽  
Turner’S Syndrome ◽  
Discoid Meniscus ◽  
Blount’S Disease ◽  
First Case ◽  
Old Japanese

Abstract Background Turner’s syndrome, discoid meniscus, and Blount’s disease have all been studied in isolation, but, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies reporting a patient with all three. Thus, the first case of Turner’s syndrome with discoid meniscus and Blount’s disease is presented. Case presentation A 5-year-old Japanese girl with a history of Turner’s syndrome and Blount’s disease complained of pain in her left knee. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a discoid lateral meniscus tear, and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy was performed, providing a good outcome. Conclusions In this report, some possible explanations regarding the concomitant presence of these three diseases are discussed. A possible explanation in this case is that the patient with Turner’s syndrome had a discoid lateral meniscus that might have been induced by some genetic factors associated with Turner’s syndrome, and then the discoid lateral meniscus might have been the mechanical stress that caused Blount’s disease.

Morphological Changes in the Residual Meniscus After Reshaping Surgery for a Discoid Lateral Meniscus

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110335
Author(s):  
Kazuya Nishino ◽  
Yusuke Hashimoto ◽  
Syuko Tsumoto ◽  
Shinya Yamasaki ◽  
Hiroaki Nakamura
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Morphological Change ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Posterior Horn ◽  
Anterior Horn ◽  
Discoid Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Clinical Difference ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Mri Scans

Background: Arthroscopic reshaping surgery is the first treatment option for a symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) to preserve the peripheral rim. However, the degree of postoperative morphological change in the residual meniscus is unclear. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to measure the meniscus after reshaping surgery for a DLM, to verify when the morphological change occurred, and to examine the related risk factors. The hypothesis was that the residual meniscal width would decrease throughout the postoperative course. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent reshaping surgery for a symptomatic DLM and had undergone follow-up for ≥2 years. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was routinely performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, and the width, height, and extrusion of the residual meniscus were measured. According to the width of the midbody on final MRI scans, we compared the preoperative and postoperative data for the preserved group (≥5 mm) and decreased group (<5 mm). The associated risk factors for a decreased meniscal width (<5 mm) of the midbody were analyzed on final MRI scans. Results: We included 61 knees of 54 patients in this study. The mean age at the time of surgery was 11.7 years. The intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of the midbody width were 0.937 and 0.921, respectively. The width of the anterior horn, midbody, and posterior horn decreased significantly from 3 to 24 months after surgery (from 9.1 to 8.6 mm [ P < .001], from 7.5 to 6.1 mm [ P < .001], and from 9.5 to 8.9 mm [ P = .001], respectively). Meniscal extrusion of the midbody did not change significantly (from 1.2 to 1.5 mm; P = .062). Overall, 46 knees (n = 20/32 in the preserved group and n = 26/29 in the decreased group) had longitudinal tears that required meniscal repair. Clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that intrameniscal degeneration (odds ratio, 4.36; P = .023) significantly increased the risk of a decreased meniscal width. Conclusion: The width of the anterior horn, midbody, and posterior horn decreased significantly from 3 to 24 months after surgery. In particular, the average decrease rate of the midbody was 19%. No clinical difference was seen in patients with a decreased width and height or with peripheral extrusion. Increased intrameniscal signals on preoperative MRI scans were associated with an increased risk of a decreased meniscal width. Surgeons should consider this result to determine the amount of resection.

scholarly journals Which factors are associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair?

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiao Song ◽  
Dongyang Chen ◽  
Xinsheng Qi ◽  
Qing Jiang ◽  
Caiwei Xia
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Partial Meniscectomy ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Confounding Factors

Abstract Purpose To investigate the potential factors associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair Methods Patients who received partial meniscectomy or meniscal repair in our institution from Jan 2015 to Dec 2019 were included in current study. The inclusion criteria were (1) meniscus tear treated using meniscectomy or repair, (2) with or without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, (3) not multiligamentous injury. Demographic data, including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), injury-to-surgery interval and intra-articular factors such as the location of injury, medial or lateral, ACL rupture or not and the option of procedure (partial meniscectomy or repair) were documented from medical records. Univariate analysis consisted of chi-square. Multivariate logistic regression was then performed to adjust for confounding factors. Results 592 patients including 399 males and 193 females with a mean age of 28.7 years (range from 10 to 75 years) were included in current study. In the univariate analysis, male (p = 0.002), patients aged 40 years or younger (p < 0.001), increased weight (p = 0.010), Posterior meniscus torn (0.011), concurrent ACL ruputure (p < 0.001), lateral meniscus (p = 0.039) and early surgery (p < 0.001) were all associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair. However, After adjusting for confounding factors, we found that age (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 - 0.68, p = 0.002), ACL injury (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.97 – 7.21, p < 0.001), side of menisci (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.43 – 7.55, p = 0.005), site of tear (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.07 – 0.32, p < 0.001), and duration of injury (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28 – 0.82, p = 0.008) were associated with the prevalence of meniscus repair. Conclusions Meniscal tear in aged patients especially those with concomitant ACL injury is likely to be repaired. Additionally, in order to increase the prevalence of repair and slow down progression of OA, the surgical procedure should be performed within two weeks after meniscus tear especially when the tear is located at lateral meniscal posterior. Study design Case-control study; level of evidence, 3.

Anterior Horn Lateral Meniscus Tear, Repair, and Meniscectomy

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (03) ◽  
pp. 229-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Prince ◽  
Amanda Esquivel ◽  
Allison Andre ◽  
Henry Goitz
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Anterior Horn ◽  
Meniscus Tear

scholarly journals Posterior Horn Repair Augmented With the Central Portion of Thickened Meniscus for Large Posterolateral Corner Loss Type of Discoid Lateral Meniscus

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e65-e73
Author(s):  
Sung-Jae Kim ◽  
Woo-Hyuk Chang ◽  
Su-Keon Lee ◽  
Ju-Hwan Chung ◽  
Keun-Jung Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Posterolateral Corner ◽  
Posterior Horn ◽  
Central Portion ◽  
Discoid Lateral Meniscus
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document