scholarly journals Do Prophylactic Knee Braces Protect the Knee Against Impacts or Tibial Moments? An In Vitro Multisensory Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596711880539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Paul Hacker ◽  
Florian Schall ◽  
Frank Niemeyer ◽  
Nicolas Wolf ◽  
Anita Ignatius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Joint Line ◽  
Strain Change ◽  
Posterior Direction ◽  
Knee Braces ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Joint Acceleration

Background: Knee braces are prescribed by physicians to protect the knee from various loading conditions during sports or after surgery, even though the effect of bracing for various loading scenarios remains unclear. Purpose: To extensively investigate whether bracing protects the knee against impacts from the lateral, medial, anterior, or posterior directions at different heights as well as against tibial moments. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight limb specimens were exposed to (1) subcritical impacts from the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior directions at 3 heights (center of the joint line and 100 mm inferior and superior) and (2) internal/external torques. Using a prophylactic brace, both scenarios were conducted under braced and unbraced conditions with moderate muscle loads and intact soft tissue. The change in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) strain, joint acceleration in the tibial and femoral bones (for impacts only), and joint kinematics were recorded and analyzed. Results: Bracing reduced joint acceleration for medial and lateral center impacts. The ACL strain change was decreased for medial superior impacts and increased for anterior inferior impacts. Impacts from the posterior direction had substantially less effect on the ACL strain change and joint acceleration than anterior impacts. Bracing had no effect on the ACL strain change or kinematics under internal or external moments. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the effect of bracing during impacts depends on the direction and height of the impact and is partly positive, negative, or neutral and that soft tissue absorbs impact energy. An effect during internal or external torque was not detected. Clinical Relevance: Bracing in contact sports with many lateral or medial impacts might be beneficial, whereas athletes who play sports with rotational moments on the knee or anterior impacts may be safer without a brace.

POSTEROMEDIAL MENISCAL AND ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT STRAINS DURING DYNAMIC ACTIVITIES FOLLOWING ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050010
Author(s):  
Sebastian Tomescu ◽  
Ryan Bakker ◽  
David Wasserstein ◽  
Mayank Kalra ◽  
Micah Nicholls ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Strain Difference ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Simulator ◽  
Lower Strain ◽  
Healthy Knee ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
The Impact

Background: Meniscal strain patterns are not well understood during dynamic activities. Furthermore, the impact of ACL reconstruction on meniscal strain has not been thoroughly investigated. The purpose of this study was to characterize ACL and meniscal strain during dynamic activities and investigate the strain difference between ACL-intact and ACL-reconstructed ligament conditions. Methods: ACL and medial meniscal strain were measured in-vitro during gait, a double leg squat, and a single leg squat. For each activity kinematics and muscle forces were applied to seven cadaveric specimens using a dynamic knee simulator. Testing was performed in the ACL-intact and ACL-reconstructed ligament conditions. Results: Both the ACL and meniscus had distinct strain patterns that were found to have a significant interaction with knee angle during gait and double leg squat ([Formula: see text]). During gait, both tissues experienced lower strain during swing than stance (ACL: 3.0% swing, 9.1% stance; meniscus: 0.2% swing, 1.3% stance). Meniscal strain was not found to be different between ACL-intact and ACL-reconstructed conditions ([Formula: see text]). Conclusions: During dynamic activities, the strain in the meniscus was not altered between ACL ligament conditions. This indicates that meniscal mechanics after ACL reconstruction are similar to a healthy knee. These results help further the understanding of osteoarthritis risk after ACL reconstruction.

Compaction of a Bone Dowel in the Tibial Tunnel Improves the Fixation Stiffness of a Soft Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 719-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Howell ◽  
Phil Roos ◽  
Maury L. Hull
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Tendon Graft ◽  
Joint Line ◽  
Fixation Device ◽  
Yield Load ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background Despite increasing attention on fixation of a soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament graft in the tibia, there have been no studies on the use of a bone dowel as a joint line fixation device for promoting fixation properties, especially stiffness at the time of implantation. Purpose To determine whether compacting a bone dowel into the tibial tunnel improves fixation stiffness, yield load, and resistance to slippage of a soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament graft. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods A double-looped tendon graft was fixed at the distal end of the tibial tunnel with a WasherLoc in 24 calf tibias. The tibial tunnels were treated with or without a dowel of cancellous bone. The bone dowel was harvested from the tibial tunnel and then compacted into a tapered space anterior to the anterior cruciate ligament graft as a joint line fixation device. A cyclic load and measurement test was administered to determine fixation stiffness, yield load, slippage, and failure mode. Results The specimens with the bone dowel had 58 N/mm more stiffness (P =. 04); however, the yield load and resistance to slippage were similar in specimens with and without the bone dowel. Conclusions A bone dowel harvested from the tibial tunnel can be used as a joint line fixation device in series with a distal fixation method to improve initial fixation stiffness and increase the fit, which is known to enhance tendon graft-to-bone healing in the tibia.

scholarly journals A Comprehensive Framework to Evaluate the Effects of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction on Graft and Cartilage Status through the Analysis of MRI T2 Relaxation Time and Knee Laxity: A Pilot Study

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1383
Author(s):  
Gregorio Marchiori ◽  
Giorgio Cassiolas ◽  
Matteo Berni ◽  
Alberto Grassi ◽  
Giacomo Dal Fabbro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
T2 Mapping ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Function ◽  
Joint Laxity ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
The Impact ◽  
And Cartilage

Background. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear represents a common orthopedic traumatic issue that often leads to an early development of osteoarthritis. To improve the diagnostic and prognostic techniques involved in the assessment of the joint after the trauma and during the healing process, the present work proposes a multi-parametric approach that aims to investigate the relationship between joint function and soft tissue status before and after ACL reconstruction. Methods. Thirteen consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were preliminarily enrolled in this study. Joint laxity assessment as well as magnetic resonance imaging with T2 mapping were performed in the pre-operative stage, at four and 18 months after surgery to acquire objective information to correlate knee function and soft tissue condition. Results. Correlations were found between graft and cartilage T2 signal, suggesting an interplay between these tissues within the knee joint. Moreover, graft maturation resulted in being connected to joint laxity, as underlined by the correlation between the graft T2 signal and the temporal evolution of knee function. Conclusions. This preliminary study represents a step forward in assessing the effects of ACL graft maturation on knee biomechanics, and vice versa. The presented integrated framework underlines the possibility to quantitatively assess the impact of ACL reconstruction on trauma recovery and cartilage homeostasis. Moreover, the reported findings—despite the preliminary nature of the clinical impacts—evidence the possibility of monitoring the surgery outcomes using a multi-parametric prognostic investigation tool.

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosing Soft Tissue Lesions Associated with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 2498-2500
Author(s):  
Bogdan Sendrea ◽  
Antoine Edu ◽  
George Viscopoleanu
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Traumatic Event ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Soft Tissue Injuries ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Soft Tissue Lesions ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Magnetic resonance imaging has become the gold standard for soft tissue lesions evaluation especially after a traumatic event where there is need for diagnostic confirmation. The objective of the current paper was to evaluate the ability of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing soft tissue lesions in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with arthroscopic findings. Through the ability to diagnose soft tissue injuries, particularly meniscal lesions, magnetic resonance imaging should be considered as fundamental in guiding therapeutic management in patients with anterior cruciate ligament lesions.

The Learning Curve in Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction. The impact on the Surgical Time and Postoperative Clinical Results

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (10) ◽  
pp. 2874-2876
Author(s):  
Teodor Negru ◽  
Stefan Mogos ◽  
Ioan Cristian Stoica
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
The Impact

Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common injury. The objective of the current study was to evaluate if the learning curve has an impact on surgical time and postoperative clinical outcomes after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using an outside-in tunnel drilling hamstrings technique. The learning curve has a positive impact on surgical time but has no influence on postoperative clinical outcomes at short time follow-up.

scholarly journals Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanjun Teng ◽  
Xiaohui Zhang ◽  
Lijun Da ◽  
Jie Hu ◽  
Hong Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Interference Screws ◽  
Suture Group ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Biomechanical Tests ◽  
Single Insertion

Abstract Background Interference screw is commonly used for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, previous studies had reported that the insertion of interference screws significantly caused graft laceration. The purposes of this study were to (1) quantitatively evaluate the graft laceration from one single insertion of PEEK interference screws; and (2) determine whether different types of sutures reduced the graft laceration after one single insertion of interference screws in ACL reconstruction. Methods The in-vitro ACL reconstruction model was created using porcine tibias and bovine extensor digitorum tendons of bovine hind limbs. The ends of grafts were sutured using three different sutures, including the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) sutures. Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) interference screws were used for tibial fixation. This study was divided into five groups (n = 10 in each group): the non-fixed group, the non-sutured group, the absorbable suture group, the Ethibond suture group and the UHMWPE suture group. Biomechanical tests were performed using the mode of pull-to-failure loading tests at 10 mm/min. Tensile stiffness (newtons per millimeter), energy absorbed to failure (in joules) and ultimate load (newtons) were recorded for analysis. Results All prepared tendons and bone specimens showed similar characteristics (length, weight, and pre-tension of the tendons, tibial bone mineral density) among all groups (P > 0.05). The biomechanical tests demonstrated that PEEK interference screws significantly caused the graft laceration (P < 0.05). However, all sutures (the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not reduce the graft laceration in ACL reconstruction (P > 0.05). Conclusions Our biomechanical study suggested that the ultimate failure load of grafts was reduced of approximately 25 % after one single insertion of a PEEK interference screw in ACL reconstruction. Suturing the ends of the grafts using different sutures (absorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not decrease the graft laceration caused by interference screws.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document