scholarly journals Latissimus Dorsi Tendon Transfer with or Without Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Treatment of Irrepairable Rotator Cuff Tears

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0010
Author(s):  
Anthony F. De Giacomo ◽  
Hithem Rahmi ◽  
Sevag Bastian ◽  
Christopher Klein ◽  
John Itamura
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Latissimus Dorsi ◽  
Tendon Transfer ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Superior Capsular Reconstruction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Objectives: Treatment options for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, in middle aged adults, consists of tendon transfer or superior capsular reconstruction (SCR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if transfer of the latissimus dorsi tendon transfer is enhanced with combination of superior capsular reconstruction for treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Methods: At a single institution, all consecutive patients undergoing transfer of the latissimus dorsi tendon with or without superior capsular reconstruction, between 2013 and 2016, for treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears were evaluated. SCR, was indicated, in addition to latissimus transfer, for patients with impaired preoperative active abduction. All clinical notes, diagnostic imaging, and operative reports were reviewed in detail. Demographics, operative techniques, and radiographic parameters were collected and measured. Functional outcome scores were prospectively collected from patients. The primary outcome of the study was the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) score. The secondary outcomes of the study were the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score. Results: At 3 years, there were a total of 26 latissimus dorsi tendon transfers performed in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. Of these, 8 patients underwent only latissimus dorsi tendon transfer and 18 patients underwent latissimus dorsi tendon transfer combined with a superior capsular reconstruction. Average age was 53 years old with the majority of patients being male (88%). The dominant extremity was involved in 22 (85%) of latissimus transfers and 14 (53%) of patients had previous surgery to address a rotator cuff tear. Follow-up, for the entire cohort, was on average 29 months. At final follow-up, there was no significant difference in physical examination or radiographic measurements between patients with latissimus transfer alone and those with latissimus transfer with SCR. All patients, undergoing either technique, showed significant improvement in both the DASH score (preoperative DASH=59.6, postoperative DASH=39.9, P=0.049) and VAS score (preoperative VAS=6.6, postoperative VAS=3.3, P=0.0006). However, those patients undergoing revision surgery, regardless of technique, showed significantly less improvement in the DASH score (P=0.005), VAS score (P=0.002), SANE score (P=0.005), and the ASES score (P=0.001). Transfer of the Latissimus tendon with SCR, in comparison to only tendon transfer, did not show any significant difference in the final DASH score (p-value=0.72). At the same time, there was no significant difference between latissimus transfer, with or without SCR, in the secondary outcomes of the VAS score(P=0.97), the SANE score(P=0.63), or the ASES score (P=0.74). Conclusion: This is the first study to report the outcomes of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer with superior capsular reconstruction in comparison to only latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. The study suggests that transfer of the latissimus dorsi tendon in combination with superior capsular reconstruction, at short term follow-up of 2 years, may not significantly influence functional outcome. Rather, patients undergoing revision surgery, regardless of technique, may demonstrate smaller improvements in functional outcomes. [Table: see text][Table: see text]

Is Subacromial Balloon Spacer Appropriate for Treatment of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears in Elderly Patients?

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 417-426
Author(s):  
Kamil Yamak ◽  
Hüseyin Gökhan Karahan ◽  
Taşkın Altay ◽  
Cemil Kayalı ◽  
Fırat Ozan
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Preoperative Period ◽  
Subacromial Space ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Quick Dash

Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of surgical treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears by subacromial balloon spacer insertion in patients over 65 years old. Material and methods. Results of patients with failed conservative treatment for irreparable rotator cuff tears and who underwent subacromial balloon spacer insertion were evaluated retrospectively. The VAS and Quick-DASH scores were used for clinical and functional assessment. Results. Eleven patients were included. Mean age of patients was 69.1 (range: 65-77) years old. Evaluation of anteroposterior shoulder x-rays revealed Hamada grade 2 and grade 1 arthropathy in 10 patients (91%) and 1 patient (9%),respectively. Mean duration of follow-up was 45.09 (±5.43,37-52) months. The difference in the subacromial space measured from standard AP shoulder x-rays in the preoperative period, in the 6th postoperative month, and at the end of follow-up was 5.44 mm (2.29), 6.51 mm (±2.23), and 5.08 mm (±2.13), respectively. Mean Quick-DASH score was 74.49(±14.36) in the preoperative period, compared to 72.19 (±14.38) at the end of follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative period and end of follow-up scores in terms of mean Quick-DASH scores (p= 0.232). Mean VAS score was 7.09 (±0.831) in the preoperative period and 6.64 (±0.809) at the end of follow-up. No statistically significant difference was revealed in terms of mean VAS scores when preoperative and end of follow-up scores were compared (p=0.333). Conclusion. Clinical and radiographic results of subacromial balloon spacer insertion in the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears could not be evaluated as satisfactory.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic lower trapezius tendon transfer provides equivalent outcomes to latissimus dorsi transfer in the treatment of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 269-274
Author(s):  
Jarret M Woodmass ◽  
Eric R Wagner ◽  
Michelle J Chang ◽  
Kathryn M Welp ◽  
Florian Grubhofer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Latissimus Dorsi ◽  
Tendon Transfer ◽  
Adhesive Capsulitis ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Forward Flexion ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Cutibacterium Acnes ◽  
Lower Trapezius

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to compare early postoperative recovery following open and arthroscopic-assisted latissimus dorsi tendon (aa-LDT) transfer to arthroscopic-assisted lower trapezius tendon (aa-LTT) transfer for patients with massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff pathology.MethodsA multicentre retrospective analysis comparing the postoperative outcomes after open LDT, arthroscopic-assisted LDT (aa-LDT) or arthroscopic-assisted LTT (aa-LTT) was performed. Active range of motion and patient-reported subjective outcomes were reported preoperatively and postoperatively. Overall, there were 10 patients who underwent open LDT transfer, 16 aaLDT transfers and 8 aa-LTT transfers with mean age of 55±3, 57±6 and 53±13, respectively. Mean follow-up was 22±10 months.ResultsArthroscopic-assisted LDT had significantly improved postoperative forward flexion (85–124, p<0.003) and external rotation (29–38, p<0.005), whereas aa-LTT had significantly improved postoperative forward flexion (101–146, p<0.04). Arthroscopic-assisted LDT and aa-LTT transfers improved American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Function scores and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) at 2 years (p<0.03). Arthroscopic-assisted LTT compared with open LDT demonstrated significantly improved ASES Shoulder Index score (20.0 vs 12.6; 84.8 vs 55.6) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (0.66 vs 4.14; 1.17 vs 3.88) at postoperative 6 months and 2 years, respectively. Arthroscopic-assisted LDT transfer compared with open LDT had improved VAS at 6 months (0.66 vs 2.11, p<0.05). In total, 6 (17.6%) complications were noted. These included two infections with Cutibacterium acnes, two axillary nerve injuries, complex regional pain syndrome and a postsurgical adhesive capsulitis.ConclusionsArthroscopic-assisted LDT and aa-LTT transfers provided improvement in pain and function at 2-year follow-up. The aa-LTT transfer provided significantly improved outcomes at 2 years compared with the open-LDT (latissimus dorsi tendon transfer) transfer. This study demonstrates superiority of arthroscopic-assisted tendon transfer techniques over traditional open techniques while establishing the aa-LTT transfer as a safe and effective alternative in the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.Level of evidenceIV.

scholarly journals Comparison of Superior Capsular Reconstruction and Partial Infraspinatus Repair: A Matched-Pair Analysis of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596712098426
Author(s):  
Stefan Greiner ◽  
Max Kaeaeb ◽  
Andreas Voss ◽  
Robert Lawton ◽  
Pushkar Bhide ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff ◽  
Superior Capsular Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Background: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) represents a new option for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of SCR and compare them with the outcomes of partial repair (PR) of the infraspinatus tendon. The hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences between the clinical and radiologic outcome parameters of SCR and PR after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Of 21 patients who underwent SCR, 20 patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio according to sex, age, and tear configuration with 20 of 60 patients who had undergone PR; all patients were prospectively evaluated for a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The investigated outcome measures included the Constant score; Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; and radiologic analysis of acromiohumeral distance (AHD) and humeral head centralization (HHC). Results: There were no differences in the demographic data between the SCR and PR groups. The mean age of both groups was 62.3 years (range, 47-79 years), the mean tear configuration was Bateman 3.0 and Patte 2.8, and the mean follow-up period was 29.4 months (range, 24-53 months). At final follow-up, no significant differences were seen between the SCR and PR groups with regard to Constant score (77.1 vs 82.7), age- and sex-adapted Constant score (85.5% vs 91.4%), DASH score (15.6 vs 7.8), or WORC index (81.1 vs 90.4). No significant differences in the AHD or HHC were seen between the groups. The reoperation rate was 4.8% (1/21) in the SCR cohort and 15% (9/60) in the PR cohort. Conclusion: Both SCR and PR resulted in significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up, with no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 techniques. Further follow-up is needed to determine whether there are long-term differences in HHC and development of cuff tear arthropathy. Further investigations should also focus on the cost-effectiveness of the respective procedures.

scholarly journals Nonarthroplasty Surgical Treatment Options for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596711880538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor J. Carver ◽  
Matthew J. Kraeutler ◽  
John R. Smith ◽  
Jonathan T. Bravman ◽  
Eric C. McCarty
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Humeral Head ◽  
Latissimus Dorsi ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Arthroscopic Debridement ◽  
Partial Repair ◽  
Latissimus Dorsi Transfer ◽  
Superior Capsular Reconstruction ◽  
Graft Interposition

Massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) provide a significant dilemma for orthopaedic surgeons. One treatment option for MIRCTs is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. However, other methods of treating these massive tears have been developed. A search of the current literature on nonoperative management, arthroscopic debridement, partial repair, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), graft interposition, balloon spacer arthroplasty, trapezius transfer, and latissimus dorsi transfer for MIRCTs was performed. Studies that described each surgical technique and reported on clinical outcomes were included in this review. Arthroscopic debridement may provide pain relief by removing damaged rotator cuff tissue, but no functional repair is performed. Partial repair has been suggested as a technique to restore shoulder functionality by repairing as much of the rotator cuff tendon as possible. This technique has demonstrated improved clinical outcomes but also fails at a significantly high rate. SCR has recently gained interest as a method to prohibit superior humeral head translation and has been met with encouraging early clinical outcomes. Graft interposition bridges the gap between the retracted tendon and humerus. Balloon spacer arthroplasty has also been recently proposed and acts to prohibit humeral head migration by placing a biodegradable saline-filled spacer between the humeral head and acromion; it has been shown to provide good clinical outcomes. Both trapezius and latissimus dorsi transfer techniques involve transferring the tendon of these respective muscles to the greater tuberosity of the humerus; these 2 techniques have shown promising restoration in shoulder function, especially in a younger, active population. Arthroscopic debridement, partial repair, SCR, graft interposition, balloon spacer arthroplasty, trapezius transfer, and latissimus dorsi transfer have all been shown to improve clinical outcomes for patients presenting with MIRCTs. Randomized controlled trials are necessary for confirming the efficacy of these procedures and to determine when each is indicated based on specific patient and anatomic factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document