Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Reduces Failure of Hamstring Tendon Autograft ACL Reconstruction -Two Year Outcomes from the STABILITY Study Randomized Clinical Trial

Objectives: Persistent anterolateral rotatory laxity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been correlated with poor outcome and graft failure. We hypothesized that anterolateral complex reconstruction by way of a Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis (LET) in combination with single bundle ACLR would reduce the risk of persistent rotatory laxity in young individuals who are deemed as being at high risk of failure. Methods: This is a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing standard hamstring tendon ACLR with combined ACLR and LET, utilizing a strip of iliotibial band (Modified Lemaire). Patients aged 25 years or less with an ACL deficient knee were included. They also had to have two of the following three criteria: 1) Grade 2 pivot shift or greater; 2) Returning to high risk/pivoting sports; 3) Generalized ligamentous laxity. The primary outcome was graft failure defined as either the need for revision ACLR or symptomatic instability associated with a positive asymmetric pivot shift, indicating persistent rotational laxity. Secondary outcome measures included the P4 pain scale, KOOS, IKDC. Patients were followed for two years with visits at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. A sample size of 300 per group was calculated based on a relative reduction in graft failure by 40%, with type 1 error of 5%, 80% power and 15% loss to follow-up rate. Results: 624 patients were randomized with a mean age of 18.9 (range: 14-25), 293 male. 436 (87.9%) patients presented pre-operatively with high-grade rotatory laxity (grade 2 pivot or greater) and 215 (42.1%) were diagnosed as having generalized ligamentous laxity (Beighton Score of 4 or greater). 523 of the 624 patients are at least 2 years postoperative; 29 lost to follow-up (˜5%). In the ACLR group 104/252 (41%) of patients suffered the primary outcome compared to 61/242 (25%) of the ACLR+LET patients (RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.79), p<0.0001. 39 patients suffered graft rupture, 28/252 (11%) in the ACLR group compared to 11/242 (4.5%) in the ACL+LET group (RR=0.41, 95%CI 0.21 to 0.80, p<0.001). At 3 months postoperative, patients in the ACLR group had less pain (p=0.004); at 3 and 6 months all KOOS subdomains, the IKDC favored the ACLR alone group (p=0.03). At 12 and 24 months, no important between-group differences were observed in any patient reported outcome. Conclusion: The addition of LET to a hamstring autograft ACLR in young active patients significantly reduces graft failure and persistent anterolateral rotatory laxity at 2 years post operatively.

Download Full-text

Graft Failure, Revision ACLR, and Reoperation Rates After ACLR With Quadriceps Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts: A Registry Study With Review of 475 Patients

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/03635465211015172 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 036354652110151

Author(s):

Malte Schmücker ◽

Jørgen Haraszuk ◽

Per Hölmich ◽

Kristoffer W. Barfod

Keyword(s):

Graft Failure ◽

Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Pivot Shift ◽

Quadriceps Tendon ◽

Hamstring Tendon ◽

Significant Trend ◽

Meniscal Injury ◽

Registry Study ◽

Cyclops Lesion

Background: It has been indicated that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with a quadriceps tendon (QT) graft has a higher risk of revision compared with ACLR performed with a hamstring tendon (HT) graft. Purpose/Hypothesis: To investigate whether ACLR with QT graft had a higher risk of graft failure, revision ACLR, or reoperation compared with HT graft in a high-volume center. We hypothesized that there would be no between-group differences. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This was a registry study with review of medical records. Our study cohort consisted of patients who underwent primary ACLR with either QT or HT graft performed at Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre between January 2015 and December 2018. The cohort was identified from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry and linked to the Danish National Patient Registry to identify all hospital contacts after ACLR. The outcome variables were graft failure (rerupture or >3-mm side-to-side difference in anteroposterior [AP] laxity), revision ACLR, reoperation due to cyclops lesion, reoperation due to meniscal injury, and reoperation due to any reason. AP laxity and pivot shift were assessed at 1 year. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate the rates of events at 2 years, and comparison was performed with Cox regression analysis. Results: A total of 475 patients (252 HT, 223 QT) were included. The rate of graft failure at 2 years was 9.4% for the QT group and 11.1% for the HT group ( P = .46). For the QT and HT groups, respectively, the rate of revision ACLR was 2.3% and 1.6% ( P = .60), the rate of reoperation due to cyclops lesion was 5.0% and 2.4% ( P = .13), and the rate of reoperation due to meniscal injury was 4.3% and 7.1% ( P = .16). The rate of reoperation due to any reason was 20.5% and 23.6% ( P = .37). At 1-year follow-up, AP laxity was 1.4 mm for QT and 1.5 mm for HT ( P = .51), and the proportion of patients with a positive pivot shift was 29-30% for both groups. Conclusion: QT and HT grafts yielded similar rates of graft failure, revision ACLR, and reoperation at 2 years of follow-up after ACLR. Graft failure was found in 9% to 11% of patients. Patients with QT ACLR showed a non–statistically significant trend of higher risk for reoperation due to cyclops lesion, and those with HT showed a non–statistically significant trend of higher risk for reoperation due to meniscal injury.

Download Full-text