scholarly journals Arthroscopic Treatment for Shoulder Instability with Glenoid Bone Loss Using Distal Tibia Allograft Augmentation: Two Year Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0034
Author(s):  
Rakesh Ebnezar ◽  
Ivan H. Wong
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Distal Tibia ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Arthroscopic Stabilization ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
The Mean

Objectives: To analyse the clinico-radiologic outcomes of patients who underwent an all arthroscopic procedure to treat shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss using a distal tibial allograft; with a minimum 2 year follow-up. Methods: A retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data was completed for patients who underwent arthroscopic stabilization with Bankart repair and allograft bony augmentation of the glenoid; by the same surgeon. Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Veterans Rand - 12 and MARX questionnaires were completed pre and post-operatively. Radiological assessment was performed with radiographs and CT scans obtained pre-operatively and at approximately one year post surgery. Results: A total of 41 patients (29 males, 12 females) with a mean age of 26 ± 9 years were included. An excellent safety profile was observed, with no intraoperative complications, neurovascular injuries, adverse events, bleeding, or infections. At 2- year follow-up, there was statistically significant improvement of the WOSI score when compared preoperatively (preoperative=62.6 ± 17.06; at 2-year=22.96± 12.92; p<0.001). The mean pre-operative bone loss was 30.32% (SD ± 7.90). There were no cases of non- union or partial union. No resorption of the graft (grade 0) was seen in 42% patients, whereas 42% and 16% of patients had grade 1 and grade 2 resorption; respectively. There was 100% healing at the interface between allograft and native glenoid. The mean sagittal dimension of the remaining allograft post-operatively was 5.10 ± 2.27 mm in the patients with ≥50% resorption which indicates there was still bone graft present and there was no complete resorption. Mean post-operative external rotation for the population was also observed to near full. Conclusion: Arthroscopic stabilization with DTA augmentation has an excellent outcome at 2-year follow-up; long-term follow-up studies are necessary for better assessment of outcomes.

scholarly journals Return to Sport Following Open Latarjet Procedure for Recurrent Shoulder Instability

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0037
Author(s):  
Joseph Liu ◽  
Anirudh Gowd ◽  
Grant Garcia ◽  
Alexander Beletsky ◽  
Brandon Cabarcas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Sport Participation ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Recurrent Instability ◽  
Post Surgery

Objectives: Shoulder instability is common within athletic populations, particularly in contact sports. The Latarjet procedure is typically reserved for recurrent instability recalcitrant to soft tissue repair. Limited literature exists regarding return-to-sport following Latarjet stabilization. Methods: A single institutional registry was queried between 2012 – 2016 for all open Latarjet stabilization procedures. Patients with no sport history were excluded. Glenoid bone loss was measured using the PICO method. Hill-Sachs defects were categorized as “on-track” or “off-track.” Sport participation was retrospectively surveyed 3-years prior and 3-years following surgery. Factors associated with return-to-sport, throwing, and recurrent instability were assessed using multivariate logistic regressions. Results: A total of 92 surgeries were identified, 67 of which were available for follow-up (72.8%). Average follow-up was 53.8 ± 11.6 months. Mean age and BMI were 27.9 ± 11.6 years and 25.9 ± 8.4 kg/m2, respectively. Mean glenoid bone loss was 16.4 ± 5.1%. There were 13 Hill Sachs lesions (5 off track), with a mean defect size of 145.8 ± 60.4 mm3. The dominant side was involved in 36 patients. Fifty-two patients (77.6%) reported return-to-sport at an average of 8.6 ± 4.6 months. Thirty-six patients (53.7%) reported return-to-sport at the same or higher level than their preoperative state. Only 58.6% of throwing athletes returned to throwing post-surgery. Seven patients (10.4%) reported recurrence of instability following surgery. A higher likelihood of recurrent instability was associated with larger Hill-Sachs volume (p=0.021, OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.16). A reduced likelihood of returning to sport at same or better level was associated with dominant-sided surgery (p=0.010, OR: 0.362, 95% CI: 0.210-0.622). Conclusion: The open Latarjet procedure is associated with high rate of return-to-sport; however, nearly half were unable to return to their pre-injury level. During preoperative assessment, consideration of Hill-Sachs lesion size and laterality are significant factors for improved outcomes.

Arthroscopic Stabilization in Patients with an Inverted Pear Glenoid

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1276-1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy S. Mologne ◽  
Matthew T. Provencher ◽  
Kyle A. Menzel ◽  
Tyler A. Vachon ◽  
Christopher B. Dewing
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bony Defect ◽  
Arthroscopic Stabilization ◽  
Recurrent Instability ◽  
Bone Deficiency ◽  
Bony Fragment ◽  
The Mean

Background Recent literature has demonstrated that the success rates of arthroscopic stabilization of glenohumeral instability deteriorate in patients with an anteroinferior glenoid bone deficiency, also known as the “inverted pear” glenoid. Purpose This study was conducted to assess the outcomes of arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients with a mean anteroinferior glenoid bone deficiency of 25% (range, 20%-30%). Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods Twenty-one of 23 patients (91% follow-up) undergoing arthroscopic stabilization surgery and noted to have a bony deficiency of the anteroinferior glenoid of 20% to 30% were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 34 months (range, 26-47). The mean age was 25 years (range, 20-34); 2 patients were female and 19 were male. All patients were treated with a primary anterior arthroscopic stabilization using a mean of 3.2 suture anchors (range, 3-4). Eleven patients had a bony Bankart that was incorporated into the repair; 10 had no bone fragment and were considered attritional bone loss. Outcomes were assessed using the Rowe score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) Index. Findings of recurrent instability and dislocation events were documented. Results Two patients (9.5%) experienced symptoms of recurrent subluxation, and 1 (4.8%) sustained a recurrent dislocation that required revision open surgery. The mean postoperative outcomes scores were as follows SANE = 88.1 (range, 65-100; standard deviation [SD] 9.0); Rowe = 85.2 (range, 55-100; SD 14.1); ASES Score = 93.1 (range, 78-100; SD 5.3); and WOSI Index = 398 (82% of normal; range, 30-1175; SD 264). No patient with a bony fragment experienced a recurrent subluxation or dislocation, and mean outcomes scores for patients with a bony fragment were better than those with no bony fragment (P = .08). No patient required medical discharge from the military for his or her shoulder condition. Conclusions Arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent instability, even in the presence of a significant bony defect of the glenoid, can yield a stable shoulder; however, outcomes are not as predictable especially in attritional bone loss cases. Longer-term follow-up is needed to see if these results hold up over time.

Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction Using Distal Tibial Allograft for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (13) ◽  
pp. 3316-3321
Author(s):  
Ivan Wong ◽  
Rakesh John ◽  
Jie Ma ◽  
Catherine M. Coady
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Arthroscopic Stabilization ◽  
Computed Tomography Scans ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Glenoid Reconstruction

Background: The all-arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction technique using a distal tibial allograft avoids damage to the subscapularis muscle and allows repair of the capsulolabral tissue. Purpose: To analyze the clinicoradiologic outcomes of patients who underwent this procedure to treat anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Over 6 years, 73 patients (52 male and 21 female; mean age, 28.8 years) under the care of the same surgeon underwent arthroscopic stabilization with capsulolabral Bankart repair and bony allograft augmentation of the glenoid for recurrent shoulder instability with significant bone loss. Pre- and postoperative patient-reported functional assessment was performed using 2 questionnaires, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and radiological assessment was performed using radiographs and computed tomography scans obtained preoperatively and approximately 1 year later (mean ± SD, 0.9 ± 1.1 years). Results: The mean follow-up was 4.7 ± 1.1 years. The mean pre- and postoperative WOSI scores were 71.1 ± 17.5 and 25.6 ± 21.9, respectively ( P < .001). There were no recurrences of dislocation, although 1 patient had symptoms of subluxation; however, 5 patients had hardware complications that required screw removal. There were no cases of nerve injury. Postoperative computed tomography scans were available for 66 patients. Seven patients were lost to follow-up. The graft union rate was 100%. Overall, graft resorption was <50% in 86% of patients (57/66). Eighteen patients (27%) had no resorption (grade 0), 39 (59%) had <50% (grades 1 and 2), and 9 (14%) had ≥50% (grade 3); however, none had symptoms of instability. The mean alpha angle of the screw between the screw shaft axis and the native glenoid axis was 18.3°± 5.7°. Graft positioning was flush with the glenoid in 61 of 66 patients (92.4%), and vertical positioning was excellent in 64 of 66 patients (97.0%) (3- to 5-o’clock position). Conclusion: Arthroscopic stabilization using distal tibial allograft augmentation resulted in excellent clinicoradiologic outcomes at a 2-year follow-up. This procedure has the advantages of being an anatomic reconstruction that addresses bony and soft tissue instability. However, long-term follow-up studies are necessary for better assessment of outcomes.

scholarly journals Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Iliac Bone Grafting for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability with Significant Glenoid Bone Loss – A Minimum of Five-year Follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0040
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Sugaya ◽  
Norimasa Takahashi ◽  
Keisuke Matsuki ◽  
Morihito Tokai ◽  
Yasutaka Takeuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Iliac Bone ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bony Defect ◽  
Capsulolabral Reconstruction ◽  
The Mean

Objectives: The choice of surgical options for traumatic anterior shoulder instability with severe glenoid bony defect remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes after arthroscopic (AS) iliac grafting with capsulolabral reconstruction with a minimum of five-year follow-up. Methods: Subjects consisted of 24 patients (24 shoulders), including 22 males and 2 females, who underwent AS iliac bone grafting and were followed for more than five years. Eighteen shoulders were primary surgery, and 6 were revision surgery. The mean age at surgery was 30 years (range, 18-52), and the mean follow-up was 8 years (range, 5-11). The mean glenoid bony defect measured on preoperative 3D-CT was 22% (range, 20-28). All surgeries were performed under general anesthesia. Free bone graft with approximately 2.0 cm length and 0.8 cm height was harvested from the iliac crest with the patients in the supine position, (Figure 1) and then the patient was placed in the beach chair position. The bone graft was inserted in the glenohumeral joint and arthroscopically fixed to the anterior glenoid using 2 cannulated screws followed by soft tissue Bankart repair using four anchors. (Figure 2 Gr: graft GL: glenoid) Functional outcomes including Rowe score, sports return, and ROM were evaluated. Radiographic findings including Samilson osteoarthritis (OA) grade and graft evaluation using 3D-CT at the final follow-up were also evaluated. Results: No patients experienced re-dislocation after surgery except one patient. All patients returned to their sports after surgery except for one patient who was not engaged in any sports. The mean Rowe score improved significantly from 19 (range, 5-40) to 95 (range, 70-100) (p<.0001). Postoperative forward flexion showed significant improvement: 157 (range, 110-180) to 170 (range, 150-180) degrees (p=.006), but no improvement in external rotation: 56 (range, 30- 85) to 56 (range, 30-70) degrees, and internal rotation: T8 (range, T5-L5) to T10 (range, T7-L5) level. OA change progressed in 8 shoulders (40%). 3DCT at the final follow-up demonstrated remodeling of the graft in 20 shoulders (88%) and absorption in 3 shoulders (12%).Failure case: A 23-year-old male experienced re-dislocation of the left shoulder during snowboarding five-year after the index surgery. Healed graft fracture and screw breakage were confirmed on 3DCT images (Figure 3). Conclusion: AS iliac bone grafting for traumatic anterior shoulder instability with significant glenoid bone loss yielded a satisfactory outcome with a minimum of five-year follow-up. Although this is technically demanding procedure, AS iliac bone grafting with capsulolabral reconstruction for shoulders with severe glenoid bone loss is an effective and practical procedure. [Figure: see text][Figure: see text][Figure: see text]

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Shoulder Stabilization in Females With Glenoid Bone Loss

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712110075
Author(s):  
Rachel M. Frank ◽  
Hytham S. Salem ◽  
Catherine Richardson ◽  
Michael O’Brien ◽  
Jon M. Newgren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Shoulder Stabilization ◽  
Simple Shoulder Test ◽  
Female Patients

Background: Nearly all studies describing shoulder stabilization focus on male patients. Little is known regarding the clinical outcomes of female patients undergoing shoulder stabilization, and even less is understood about females with glenoid bone loss. Purpose: To assess the clinical outcomes of female patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability treated with the Latarjet procedure. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All cases of female patients who had recurrent anterior shoulder instability with ≥15% anterior glenoid bone loss and underwent the Latarjet procedure were analyzed. Patients were evaluated after a minimum 2-year postoperative period with scores of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons form, Simple Shoulder Test, and pain visual analog scale. Results: Of the 22 patients who met our criteria, 5 (22.7%) were lost to follow-up, leaving 17 (77.2%) available for follow-up with a mean ± SD age of 31.7 ± 12.9 years. Among these patients, 16 (94.1%) underwent 1.6 ± 0.73 ipsilateral shoulder operations (range, 1-3) before undergoing the Latarjet procedure. Preoperative indications for surgery included recurrent instability with bone loss in all cases. After a mean follow-up of 40.2 ± 22.9 months, patients experienced significant score improvements in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons form, Simple Shoulder Test, and pain visual analog scale ( P < .05 for all). There were 2 reoperations (11.8%). There were no cases of neurovascular injuries or other complications. Conclusion: Female patients with recurrent shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss can be successfully treated with the Latarjet procedure, with outcomes similar to those of male patients in the previously published literature. This information can be used to counsel female patients with recurrent instability with significant anterior glenoid bone loss.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Soft Tissue Stabilization for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability in Elite Collision Athletes

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0019
Author(s):  
Hoshika Shota ◽  
Hiroyuki Sugaya ◽  
Norimasa Takahashi ◽  
Keisuke Matsuki ◽  
Morihito Tokai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bony Bankart ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tissue Stabilization

Objectives: Surgical options for shoulder instability in collision athletes remain controversial. Although arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization is widely accepted treatment for traumatic anterior shoulder instability, many surgeons prefer coracoid transfer such as Latarjet procedure for collision athletes with or without glenoid defect due to potential high recurrence rate after arthroscopic soft tissue Bankart repair (ABR). In the meantime, Hill-Sachs remplissage (HSR) has been gaining popularity as an effective arthroscopic augmentation procedure. Since 2002, we performed rotator interval closure (RIC) as an augmentation in addition to ABR or arthroscopic bony Bankart repair (ABBR) for collision athletes and obtained satisfactory outcome. However, teen players demonstrated higher recurrence rate compared to twenties and thirties. Therefore, from 2012, we performed HSR as an additional augmentation for teen players besides ABR/ABBR and RIC. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes after arthroscopic stabilization in collision athletes who underwent shoulder stabilization under our treatment strategy. Methods: Between 2012 through 2015, 95 consecutive collision athletes underwent shoulder stabilization. Among those, only 2 patients (2%) underwent arthroscopic bony procedure for poor capsular integrity. Among the remaining 93 patients who underwent soft tissue stabilization, 65 were available for minimum 2-year follow-up (70%). Therefore, subjects consisted of 65 players including 54 rugby and 11 American football players (Table 1). There were 13 national top league, 24 collegiate, 21 junior or senior high school, and 7 recreational players. The mean age at surgery was 20 years (range, 16-36). The mean follow-up was 37 months (range, 24-64). We retrospectively reviewed intraoperative findings and surgical procedures using patient records including surgical reports and videos. We also investigated functional outcome and recurrence rate. Pre- and postoperative Rowe scores were compared using paired t test. Results: Preoperative 3DCT of the glenoid demonstrated bony Bankart (fragment type) in 43 players (66%), attritional type in 16 (25%), and normal glenoid in 6 (9%). Mean glenoid bone loss was 15% (range, 0-25) and all of the glenoid with more than 10% bone loss retained bony fragment. All 65 players demonstrated Bankart lesion and 15 had concomitant SLAP lesion (23%) which required to be repaired. In addition, 5 players demonstrated capsule tear (8%), which were also repaired. Twenty-four players (36%) underwent ABR or ABBR with RIC and forty one players (64%) underwent ABR or ABBR combined with HSR (Table 1). The mean Rowe score significantly improved after surgery from 65 (range, 55-75) to 92 (range, 65-100) (P < .001). Recurrence appeared in 2 cases (3%), both of which were junior or senior high school players who underwent ABR with HSR. Ten national top league players who underwent ABR with RIC had no recurrence. Conclusion: Soft tissue stabilization combined with selective augmentation procedures for traumatic shoulder instability in collision athletes demonstrated satisfactory outcomes with extremely low recurrence rate. Since the incidence of having bony Bankart lesion in collision athletes was very high, arthroscopic bony Bankart repair worked in many patients even with significant glenoid bone loss. Further, Hill-Sachs remplissage seemed to be effective additional augmentation especially in young collision athletes. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals The Instability Severity Index Score Revisited: Evaluation of 217 Consecutive Cases of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0026
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Provencher ◽  
George Sanchez ◽  
Andrew S. Bernhardson ◽  
Liam A. Peebles ◽  
Daniel B. Haber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Index Score ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Arthroscopic Stabilization ◽  
Recurrent Instability ◽  
Severity Index Score ◽  
Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability

Objectives: The instability severity index score (ISIS) was designed to predict the risk of recurrence after arthroscopic instability shoulder surgery and to better predict those who would benefit from an open or bone transfer operation. Although this score has been widely disseminated to predict recurrence, there are certain areas in which preoperative assessment is limited, especially in radiographic workup. The objective of this study was to examine the validity of ISIS based on its existing variables, as well as to evaluate additional imaging and patient history variables pertinent to the potential redevelopment of a new score to assess risk of recurrent anterior instability following an arthroscopic Bankart repair. Methods: All consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled with recurrent anterior shoulder instability who subsequently underwent an arthroscopic stabilization with minimum 24 months follow-up. Exclusion criteria included, prior surgery on the shoulder, posterior or multidirectional instability, or a rotator cuff tear. All instability severity index score variables were recorded (age <20, degree and sport type, hyperlaxity, Hill Sachs on AP xray, glenoid loss of contour on AP xray), as well as additional variables: 1. Position of arm at dislocation; 2. Number of instability events; 3. Total time of instability; 4. Glenoid bone loss percent; 5. Amount of attritional glenoid bone loss; 6. Hill Sachs measures (H/W/D and volume), and outcomes (recurrent instability) and scores (WOSI, ASES and SANE). Regression analysis was utilized to determine preoperative variables that predicted outcomes and failures. Results: There were 217 consecutive patients (209 male-96.5%, 8 female-3.5%) who met criteria and were all treated with a primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization during a 3.5-year period (2007-2011), with mean follow-up of 42 (range, 26-58 mos). The mean age at first instability event was 23.9 (range, 16-48), with 55% right shoulder affected, 60% dominant shoulder. Outcomes were improved from mean scores preoperative (WOSI=1050/2100, ASES=61.0, SANE=52.5) to postoperative (WOSI=305/2100, ASES=93.5, SANE=95.5), and 11.5% (25/217) had evidence or recurrent instability or subluxation. A total of 51/217 were 20 years or under, hyperlaxity in 5, Hill Sachs on internal rotation XR in 77, glenoid contour on AP XR in 41, with an overall mean ISIS score of 3.6. Factors associated with failure were glenoid bone loss greater than 14.5%(p<0.001), total time of instability symptoms >11.5 months(p<0.03), Hill Sachs volume > 1.3 cm3 with H>1.5 cm, W>1.0 cm and D>5 mm(p<0.01), contact sport (p<0.01) and age 20 or under (p<0.01). There was no correlation in outcomes with Hill Sachs on IR or glenoid contour on XR (p>0.45), sports participation, and Instability Severity Score (mean=3.4 success, vs 3.9 failure, p>0.44). Conclusion: At nearly four years of follow-up, there was an 11.5% failure rate of scope stabilization surgery. However, there was no correlation between treatment outcome and the ISIS measure given a mean score of 3.4 with little difference identified in those that failed. However, several important parameters previously unidentified were detected including, glenoid bone loss >14.5%, Hill Sachs volume >1.3 cm3, and time length of instability symptoms. Therefore, the ISIS measure may need to be redesigned in order to incorporate variables that more accurately portray the actual risk of failure following arthroscopic stabilization.

Glenoid Bone Loss in Posterior Shoulder Instability: Prevalence and Outcomes in Arthroscopic Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1053-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Hines ◽  
Jay B. Cook ◽  
James S. Shaha ◽  
Kevin Krul ◽  
Steve H. Shaha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Labral Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Stabilization ◽  
Posterior Instability ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Return To Duty

Background: Glenoid bone loss is a well-accepted risk factor for failure after arthroscopic stabilization of anterior glenohumeral instability. Glenoid bone loss in posterior instability has been noted relative to its existence in posterior instability surgery. Its effect on outcomes after arthroscopic stabilization has not been specifically evaluated and reported. Purpose: The purpose was to evaluate the presence of posterior glenoid bone loss in a series of patients who had undergone arthroscopic isolated stabilization of the posterior labrum. Bone loss was then correlated to return-to-duty rates, complications, and validated patient-reported outcomes. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted at a single military treatment facility over a 4-year period (2010-2013). Patients with primary posterior instability who underwent arthroscopic isolated posterior labral repair were included. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to calculate posterior glenoid bone loss using a standardized “perfect circle” technique. Demographics, return to duty, complications, and reoperations, as well as outcomes scores including the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scores, were obtained. Outcomes were analyzed across all patients based on percentage of posterior glenoid bone loss. Bone loss was then categorized as below or above the subcritical threshold of 13.5% to determine if bone loss effected outcomes similar to what has been shown in anterior instability. Results: There were 43 consecutive patients with primary, isolated posterior instability, and 32 (74.4%) completed WOSI scoring. Mean follow-up was 53.7 months (range, 25-82 months) The mean posterior glenoid bone loss was 7.3% (0%-21.5%). Ten of 32 patients (31%) had no appreciable bone loss. Bone loss exceeded 13.5% in 7 of 32 patients (22%), and 2 patients (6%) exceeded 20% bone loss. Return to full duty or activity was nearly 90% overall. However, those with >13.5%, subcritical glenoid bone loss, were statistically less likely to return to full duty (relative risk = 1.8), but outcomes scores, complications, and revision rates were otherwise not different in those with no or minimal bone loss versus those with more significant amounts. Conclusion: Posterior glenoid bone loss has not previously been evaluated independently relative to patients with shoulder instability repairs. Sixty-nine percent of our patients had measurable bone loss, and 22% had greater than 13.5%, or above subcritical bone loss. While these patients were statistically less likely to return to full duty, the reoperation rate, complications, and patient-reported outcomes between groups were not different.

Feline Distal Tibial Physeal Fracture Repair Using a Modified Cross-Pin Technique with Four Pins

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (03) ◽  
pp. 220-226
Author(s):  
Diogo Miraldo ◽  
Bettina Salmelin ◽  
Russell Yeadon
Keyword(s):  
Kirschner Wire ◽  
Subjective Assessment ◽  
Fracture Repair ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Clinical Study ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Type Of Fracture ◽  
Physeal Fractures

Abstract Objective The aim of this article was to report the surgical technique and clinical outcome of a modified cross-pin technique for the treatment of distal tibial physeal fractures in cats without postoperative external coaptation. Study Design This study was a retrospective clinical study. Animals A total of 9 cats were presented with fracture of the distal tibial physis. Materials and Methods Medical records from July 2014 to September 2018 were reviewed. In all cases, a second medial and a craniolateral Kirschner wires were added to the traditional cross-pin technique. Information reviewed included orthogonal radiographs pre- and post-surgery and at subsequent re-examinations, subjective assessment of lameness and passive range of motion, veterinary clinical assessment and completion of a functional questionnaire (feline musculoskeletal pain index) at the time of writing this report. Eight owners completed the questionnaire. The mean questionnaire follow-up time was 12.7 months. Results Uncomplicated fracture healing occurred in all patients. Two patients required implant removal due to Kirschner wire migration and protrusion through the skin at 5 and 12 months post-surgery. No other complications were noticed. Eight patients had an excellent outcome, and one patient had a good outcome. Conclusion Distal tibial physeal fractures in cats can be treated successfully with the use of a modified cross-pin technique and without the use of external coaptation. Prognosis should be considered favourable for this type of fracture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document