scholarly journals Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors of Pediatric Primary Care Providers on Management of Cholestasis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2333794X1982975
Author(s):  
Timothy Joseph Menz ◽  
Michael Herzlinger ◽  
Albert Ross ◽  
Mark R. Zonfrillo

Biliary atresia is a common cause of cholestasis in infants and is a time-sensitive diagnosis. A survey was distributed to pediatric primary care providers in order to assess variations in diagnosis and management of cholestasis. Participants were identified from physician parent groups on social media and regional pediatric residency programs. Information on knowledge and interpretation of screening tests, past experience/behavior, confidence, and comfort level managing cholestasis, as well as demographic information was collected. Out of 116 eligible respondents, 94.8% were confident in diagnosing hyperbilirubinemia but only 10.3% knew the biochemical definition of direct hyperbilirubinemia. Of the 56% of providers who had some knowledge of the guidelines, 18.5% stated the guidelines changed the way they evaluate cholestasis. These results demonstrate a gap in knowledge of diagnosing and evaluating cholestasis, which could provide the framework for standardized screening, leading to earlier identification of biliary atresia.

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 806-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex M. Taylor ◽  
Lise E. Nigrovic ◽  
Meredith L. Saillant ◽  
Emily K. Trudell ◽  
Jonathan R. Modest ◽  
...  

Pediatric primary care providers report limited training and tools to manage concussion. We developed a learning community intervention for a large independent pediatric practice association affiliated with a university hospital to standardize concussion management and improve the use of consensus-based guidelines. The learning community included in-person and online didactics, followed by a web-based reinforcement platform to educate and train clinicians on our treatment algorithm and decision support tools. Chart reviews before and after the intervention demonstrated significant increases in the use of standardized symptom rating scales (19.6% to 69.3%; P < .001), balance assessment (2.3% to 37.6%; P < .001), and scheduled follow-up (41.8% to 61.2%; P < .001), with an increase in delivery of our entire best practice bundle from 3.5% to 28.1% ( P < .001). A multimodal educational intervention can effect change among pediatric primary care providers and help align their management practices with consensus-based guidelines.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. e49-e58
Author(s):  
Anne E. Pidano ◽  
Natasha K. Segool ◽  
Natalie Delgado ◽  
Kip Forness ◽  
Kathryn Hagen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Saman ◽  
Kayla M. Walton ◽  
Melissa L. Harry ◽  
Stephen E. Asche ◽  
Anjali R. Truitt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cancer is the leading cause of death in the United States, with the burden expected to rise in the coming decades, increasing the need for effective cancer prevention and screening options. The United States Preventive Services Task Force has suggested that a shared decision-making process be used when clinicians and patients discuss cancer screening. The electronic medical record (EMR) often provides only reminders or alerts to primary care providers (PCPs) when screenings are due, a strategy with limited efficacy. Methods We administered a cross-sectional electronic survey to PCPs (n = 165, 53% response rate) at 36 Essentia Health primary care clinics participating in a large, National Cancer Institute-funded study on a cancer prevention clinical decision support (CDS) tool. The survey assessed PCP demographics, perceptions of the EMR’s ability to help assess and manage patients’ cancer risk, and experience and comfort level discussing cancer screening and prevention with patients. Results In these predominantly rural clinics, only 49% of PCPs thought the EMR was well integrated to help assess and manage cancer risk. Both advanced care practitioners and physicians agreed that cancer screening and informed discussion of cancer risks are important; however, only 53% reported their patients gave cancer screening a high priority relative to other health issues. Conclusions The impact of EMR-linked CDS delivered to both patients and PCPs may improve cancer screening, but only if it is easy to use and saves PCPs time.


2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 531-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prerna G. Arora ◽  
Elizabeth H. Connors ◽  
Kelly Coble ◽  
Angela Blizzard ◽  
Larry Wissow ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document