scholarly journals Illuminating the Complexity of Oral Reading Fluency: A Multiple Lens Approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 358-376
Author(s):  
Amanda Percle ◽  
Laura Arrington ◽  
Alan D. Flurkey ◽  
Holly Damico ◽  
Christine Weill ◽  
...  

Oral reading fluency is recognized as an important variable associated with the assessment of reading proficiency. Frequently, fluency assessments distill a child’s overall reading fluency to a single numerical score. Even when multiple dimensions are considered, the processes informing the nuance of the reading fluency variations are ignored. In order to shed light on the issue, we use an instrumental case study approach to illuminate how a reader’s fluency varies within a passage. We describe the insight this variability provides to teachers and researchers interested in understanding how readers transact with print. Specifically, we apply a multiple lens approach to analyze one child’s oral reading fluency and address the question: What variables contribute to a reader’s fluency? We combine eye movement miscue analysis and Flurkey’s oral reading flow and compare these assessments to Rasinski’s well-established fluency instrument. This methodology led to the identification of six variables influencing oral reading fluency. Five of the influential factors could not be observed using the traditional fluency measure. These five variables illuminate the complexity of oral reading fluency and support greater understanding of a reader’s abilities. This strengths-based conceptualization of fluency offers supportive rather than subtractive insight into a reader’s fluctuations in oral reading fluency. Our findings highlight a need for professionals to more adequately consider the conceptualizations of oral reading fluency.

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Arnesen ◽  
Johan Braeken ◽  
Scott Baker ◽  
Wilhelm Meek-Hansen ◽  
Terje Ogden ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 002221942110451
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Washburn

In this article, I systematically review evidence on the relations between oral reading fluency (ORF) and reading comprehension (RC) for adolescents with limited reading proficiency (ALRP) in Grades 6 to12. I organized findings from 23 studies into five themes: (a) unclear role of ORF in the simple view of reading model for ALRP, (b) ALRP have distinct reader profiles, (c) ORF consists of more than automaticity, (d) the role of ORF varies, and (e) oral reading automaticity has tenuous predictive value for ALRP. Results suggest that knowledge of an adolescent’s ORF, as commonly defined and assessed, provides helpful information about an adolescent’s reader profile, but is not sufficient to evaluate instructional needs nor measure progress. I conclude the article with a discussion on implications for researchers, assessment developers, practitioners, and school administrators.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas D. Young ◽  
Edward J. Daly ◽  
Sara Kupzyk ◽  
Melissa N. Andersen

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Reitman ◽  
Stacey A. McGregor ◽  
Leon Mandler ◽  
Jean M. Thaw ◽  
K. Lori Hanson ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-175
Author(s):  
Ji Hye Jeon ◽  
◽  
Sungwoo Kang

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastassia Loukina ◽  
Beata Beigman Klebanov ◽  
Patrick Lange ◽  
Yao Qian ◽  
Binod Gyawali ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 653-658
Author(s):  
Karole Howland ◽  
Kathleen Scaler Scott

Author(s):  
Theresa A Grasparil ◽  
David A Hernandez

Poor literacy achievement among English learners has contributed significantly to their high dropout rates, poor job prospects, and high poverty rates. The National Literacy Panel on Language Minority Children and Youth has suggested that English learners benefit from the same direct, systematic instruction in the five essential components of reading shown effective for native-English-speaking students: phonemic awareness, phonics, oral reading fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. Implementing effective reading instructional practices for English learners may reduce the literacy achievement gap between English learners and native English speakers. In this study, we used multiple regression to examine data for 1,376 third-grade Latino English learners to determine the strength of oral English proficiency, oral reading fluency, and academic vocabulary knowledge as predictors of reading comprehension proficiency. Findings of this study indicate a mismatch between English learners’ instructional needs and a widely used reading program component, assessment of words correct per minute (as a measure of oral reading fluency). Significant conclusions of this study suggest that educators seeking to promote the reading comprehension proficiency of Latino English learners consider using WCPM assessments and activities cautiously and strive to allocate more time for instruction and assessment of the prosodic dimension of oral reading fluency and academic vocabulary knowledge and skills.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document