scholarly journals Quality of dying after acute stroke

2021 ◽  
pp. 239698732110418
Author(s):  
Hendrik Reinink ◽  
Marjolein Geurts ◽  
Constance Melis-Riemens ◽  
Annemarie Hollander ◽  
Jaap Kappelle ◽  
...  

Introduction There is a lack of evidence concerning the palliative needs of patients with acute stroke during end-of-life care. We interviewed relatives of patients who deceased in our stroke unit about the quality of dying and compared their experiences with those of nurses. Patients and Methods Relatives of 59 patients were interviewed approximately 6 weeks after the patient had died. The primary outcome was a score assessing the overall quality of dying on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 representing the worst quality and 10 the best quality. We investigated the frequency and appreciation of specific aspects of the dying phase with an adapted version of the Quality of Death and Dying Questionnaire. The nurse who was most frequently involved in the end-of-life care of the patient completed a similar questionnaire. Results Family members were generally satisfied with the quality of dying (median overall score 8; interquartile range, 6–9) as well as with the care provided by nurses (9; 8–10) and doctors (8; 7–9). Breathing difficulties were frequently reported (by 46% of the relatives), but pain was not. Unsatisfactory experiences were related to feeding (69% unsatisfactory), inability to say goodbye to loved ones (51%), appearing not to have control (47%), and not retaining a sense of dignity (41%). Two-thirds of the relatives reported that palliative medication adequately resolved discomfort. There was a good correlation between the experiences of relatives and nurses. Discussion and Conclusion Most relatives were satisfied with the overall quality of dying. Negative experiences concerned feeding problems, not being able to say goodbye to loved ones, sense of self control and dignity, and breathing difficulties. Experiences of nurses may be a reasonable and practical option when evaluating the quality of dying in acute stroke patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juanjuan Zhao ◽  
Liming You ◽  
Hongmei Tao ◽  
Frances Kam Yuet Wong

Abstract Background Assessing the quality of structure and process of end-of-life care can help improve outcomes. There was currently no valid tool for this purpose in Mainland China. The aim of this study is to validate the Chinese version of the Care Evaluation Scale (CES). Methods From January to December 2017, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted among bereaved family members of cancer patients from 10 medical institutes. The reliability of the CES was assessed with Cronbach’s α, and structural validity was evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was tested by examining the correlation between the CES total score and overall satisfaction with end-of-life care, quality of dying and death, and quality of life. Results A total of 305 valid responses were analyzed. The average CES score was 70.7 ± 16.4, and the Cronbach’s α of the CES was 0.967 (range: 0.802–0.927 for the 10 domains). The fit indices for the 10-factor model of CES were good(root-mean-square error of approximation, 0.047; comparative fit index, 0.952; Tucker–Lewis index, 0.946; standardized root mean square residual, 0.053). The CES total score was highly correlated with overall satisfaction with medical care (r = 0.775, P < 0.01), and moderately correlated with patients’ quality of life (r = 0.579, P < 0.01) and quality of dying and death (r = 0.570, P < 0.01). In addition, few associations between CES total score and demographic characteristics, except for the family members’ age. Conclusions The Chinese version of the CES is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the quality of structure and process of end-of-life care for patients with cancer from the perspective of bereaved family in Mainland China.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1584-1595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara Pivodic ◽  
Tinne Smets ◽  
Nele Van den Noortgate ◽  
Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen ◽  
Yvonne Engels ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-78
Author(s):  
Jideuma Ikenna Egwim ◽  
Smita Palejwala

78 Background: Advanced cancers remain a major cause of mortality in Nigeria. Participation in clinical trials (PCTs) and palliative end-of-life care (PEOLC) are two approaches to incurable cancer management in the developed nations but these have been less adopted in Nigeria. This study set out to determine patients’ preferred approach between PCTs and PEOLC for management of advanced cancers in Nigeria. Methods: A survey of 120 advanced cancer patients was conducted using a questionnaire with 5-point Likert scale, variables of interest included demographic information, knowledge and perception about PCTs and PEOLC. Results: Majority of the patients (84%) agree PCTs is an option in management of incurable cancer but just about half accept it is beneficial and will improve their QOL, as against PEOLC, where all the patients considered it an option and deem it beneficial; with 99% and 98% respectively agreeing it will enhance their QOL and that of family members. About 56% believe PCTs carries a risk of burdensome interventions and 52% increased hospital stay at EOL while 47% are of the opinion it will increase cost of care with 45% stating it will lead to increased ICU death. Sixty-nine percent (69%) and 63% respectively agree PCTs increases the suffering of patients and family members while 43% believe it carries a net negative risk-benefit profile, nevertheless, 83% are ready to overlook the risk of PCTs for possible therapeutic benefit while for 87%, the primary motivation for PCTs is personal cure. Majority (58%) believe PCTs does not improve quality of dying/death contrary to PEOLC where 88% believe it would improve the quality of dying/death. Overall, by direct comparison 78%:13% prefer PEOL to PCTs; {X2(p-value), 40.26(0.001)}. Conclusions: Both modalities are acceptable to advanced cancer patients but the study reveals several ethical issues with PCTs including risk of burdensome interventions, suffering of patients, therapeutic misconception and misperception of curability. A major determinant to accepting PEOL is its positive impact on patients’ QOL. Concerted efforts are needed to significantly enhance access of PEOLC to cancer patients.


Thorax ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 328-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen H M Houben ◽  
Martijn A Spruit ◽  
Hans Luyten ◽  
Herman-Jan Pennings ◽  
Vivian E M van den Boogaart ◽  
...  

RationaleAdvance care planning (ACP) is uncommon in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).ObjectivesTo assess whether a nurse-led ACP-intervention can improve quality of patient-physician end-of-life care communication in patients with COPD. Furthermore, the influence of an ACP-intervention on symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients and loved ones was studied. Finally, quality of death and dying was assessed in patients who died during 2-year follow-up.MethodsA multicentre cluster randomised-controlled trial in patients with advanced COPD was performed. The intervention group received an 1.5 hours structured nurse-led ACP-session. Outcomes were: quality of patient-physician end-of-life care communication, prevalence of ACP-discussions 6 months after baseline, symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients and loved ones and quality of death and dying.Results165 patients were enrolled (89 intervention; 76 control). The improvement of quality of patient-physician end-of-life care communication was significantly higher in the intervention group compared with the control group (p<0.001). The ACP-intervention was significantly associated with the occurrence of an ACP-discussion with physicians within 6 months (p=0.003). At follow-up, symptoms of anxiety were significantly lower in loved ones in the intervention group compared with the control group (p=0.02). Symptoms of anxiety in patients and symptoms of depression in both patients and loved ones were comparable at follow-up (p>0.05). The quality of death and dying was comparable between both groups (p=0.17).ConclusionOne nurse-led ACP-intervention session improves patient-physician end-of-life care communication without causing psychosocial distress in both patients and loved ones.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juanjuan Zhao ◽  
Liming You ◽  
Hongmei Tao ◽  
Frances Kam Yuet Wong

Abstract Background: Assessing the quality of structure and process of end-of-life care can help improve outcomes. There was currently no valid tool for this purpose in mainland China. The aim of this study is to validate the Chinese version of the Care Evaluation Scale (CES).Methods: From January to December 2017, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted among bereaved family members of cancer patients from 10 medical institutes. The reliability of the CES was assessed with Cronbach’s α, and structural validity was evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was tested by examining the correlation between the CES total score and overall satisfaction with end-of-life care, quality of dying and death, and quality of life.Results: A total of 305 valid responses were analyzed. The average CES score was 70.67±16.42, and the Cronbach’s α of the CES was 0.967 (range: 0.802–0.927 for the 10 domains). The fit indices for the 10-factor model of CES were good (root-mean-square error of approximation, 0.047; comparative fit index, 0.952; Tucker–Lewis index, 0.946; standardized root mean square residual, 0.053). The CES total score was highly correlated with overall satisfaction with medical care (r=0.775, P<0.01), and moderately correlated with patients’ quality of life (r=0.579, P<0.01) and quality of dying and death (r=0.570, P<0.01). In addition, few associations between CES total score and demographic characteristics, except for the family members’ age.Conclusions: The Chinese version of the CES is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the quality of structure and process of end-of-life care for patients with cancer from the perspective of bereaved family in mainland China.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Tjernberg ◽  
Christina Bökberg

Abstract Background: Few studies have focused on how older persons living in nursing homes perceive their last period of life. Furthermore, previous research on older persons’ perceptions of death and dying is limited. Hence, there is an urgent need to explore their experiences during their final period in life.Aim: To explore thoughts about death and dying and experiences of end-of-life care among older persons living in nursing homes.Methods: This study employed a qualitative approach including individual interviews with 36 older persons living in Swedish nursing homes. Questions related to quality of life; physical health; thoughts about death, dying, and the future; and experiences related to the living condition and environment were asked. The interview transcripts were analysed through content analysis. The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board (reference number: 2015/4).Results: The analysis resulted in the identification of three main thematic categories: The unavoidable and unknown end of life, Thoughts on control and Living your last period of life at a nursing home. The older persons did not fear death itself but had some worries about dying. Spending the last stage of life at a nursing home contributed to different thoughts and feelings among the older persons. With a few exceptions, older persons characterized life at the nursing home as boring and felt they were surrounded by people who did not belong there.Conclusions: This study indicates a need for older persons to talk about death, dying and end-life issues. Furthermore, this study highlighted that the co-residence of cognitively healthy persons and persons with dementia in the same ward adversely affected cognitively healthy persons. This situation resulted in there being not enough time to both handle the care needs of persons with dementia and have the conversations that cognitively healthy persons desired, such as conversations about thoughts about existence, that could have improved their quality of life.Trial registration: NCT02708498 Date of registration 16 February 2016.


2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Verhofstede ◽  
Tinne Smets ◽  
Joachim Cohen ◽  
Kim Eecloo ◽  
Massimo Costantini ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Tjernberg ◽  
Christina Bökberg

Abstract Background: Few studies have focused on how older persons living in nursing homes perceive their last period of life. Furthermore, previous research on older persons’ perceptions of death and dying is limited. Hence, there is an urgent need to explore their experiences during their final period in life.Aim: To explore thoughts about death and dying and experiences of end-of-life care among older persons living in nursing homes.Methods: This study employed a qualitative approach including individual interviews with 36 older persons living in Swedish nursing homes. Questions related to quality of life; physical health; thoughts about death, dying, and the future; and experiences related to the living condition and environment were asked. The interview transcripts were analysed through content analysis. The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board (reference number: 2015/4).Results: The analysis resulted in the identification of three main thematic categories: The unavoidable and unknown end of life, Thoughts on control and Living your last period of life at a nursing home. The older persons did not fear death itself but had some worries about dying. Spending the last stage of life at a nursing home contributed to different thoughts and feelings among the older persons. With a few exceptions, older persons characterized life at the nursing home as boring and felt they were surrounded by people who did not belong there.Conclusions: This study indicates a need for older persons to talk about death, dying and end-life issues. Furthermore, this study highlighted that the co-residence of cognitively healthy persons and persons with dementia in the same ward adversely affected cognitively healthy persons. This situation resulted in there being not enough time to both handle the care needs of persons with dementia and have the conversations that cognitively healthy persons desired, such as conversations about thoughts about existence, that could have improved their quality of life.Trial registration: NCT02708498 Date of registration 16 February 2016.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjam C. van Soest-Poortvliet ◽  
Jenny T. van der Steen ◽  
Sheryl Zimmerman ◽  
Lauren W. Cohen ◽  
David Reed ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document