A Survey of Response to Intervention Team Members' Effective Practices in Rural Elementary Schools

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janna Brendle
2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra T. Neil ◽  
Sarah Nothard ◽  
David Glentworth ◽  
Elaine Stewart

AbstractPsychosocial Interventions (PSIs) and PSI supervision underpin the delivery of early interventions for people experiencing psychosis. Early Intervention (EI) teams are relatively new in the NHS and there is currently a lack of empirical research into PSI supervision in this area. This study aimed to elicit staff views of PSI supervision and to identify any unmet supervision needs within a newly developed EI team in the UK. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 multidisciplinary team members. Descriptive statistics and a thematic analysis were used to analyse the responses. The different types of supervision available to team members, gaps in the provision of PSI supervision and aspects that supervisees found helpful and unhelpful about PSI supervision are discussed as are ideas for improving the provision of PSI supervision in EI teams. The limitations of the study and ideas for further research are also outlined.


2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Nagle ◽  
Glenda Hernandez ◽  
Sandra Embler ◽  
Margaret J. Mclaughlin ◽  
Frances Doh

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 164
Author(s):  
Evan Hilberg ◽  
Patrick Abi Nader ◽  
John M. Schuna ◽  
Deborah John ◽  
Katherine B. Gunter

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 477
Author(s):  
Patrick Abi Nader ◽  
Evan Hilberg ◽  
John M. Schuna ◽  
Katherine B. Gunter

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 637-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Abi Nader ◽  
Evan Hilberg ◽  
John M. Schuna ◽  
Deborah H. John ◽  
Katherine B. Gunter

Background: Classroom-based physical activity (CBPA) breaks are a cost-effective strategy to promote physical activity (PA) at school. Despite teachers’ critical roles in sustained implementation of CBPA breaks, few studies examined the association of teacher-level factors with student PA levels, and none focused on rural schools. Methods: We monitored children’s PA levels over 4 consecutive school days at 6 rural Oregon elementary schools with Walk4Life pedometers. During the same week, teachers recorded all student PA opportunities (recess, PE, and CBPA breaks) and answered a 26-item questionnaire about factors influencing their use of CBPA breaks. Mixed-effects models were used to associate teacher-level factors and PA opportunities with children’s moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA; in minutes per day), controlling for child-level covariates. Results: When teachers valued PA, students accumulated more MVPA (1.07 min/d; P < .01) than students of teachers reporting low PA value. Students did more MVPA (1 min/d; P < .001) when teachers agreed the school operating conditions posed barriers to providing PA than when teachers disagreed that barriers existed. PE classes contributed significantly to student’s PA levels. Conclusion: Provision of PE, increasing teacher value for PA, and further investigation of how teacher-level factors relate to students’ MVPA levels during CBPA breaks at rural elementary schools are warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document