scholarly journals Cord Blood Transplantation in Adolescents and Young Adults with Acute Leukemia: On Behalf of Eurocord, Ctiwp and PDWP of EBMT

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3369-3369
Author(s):  
Hiromi Hayashi ◽  
Fernanda Volt ◽  
Jaime Sanz ◽  
Eefke J. Petersen ◽  
Nicolas Boissel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
P Value ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Remission ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Outcomes for adolescents and young adults (AYA) might be considerably different from children and older adults with acute leukemia (AL). Patients in this transitory period tend to be considered at higher risk for poorer outcomes. However, AYA is still underrepresented in most hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) studies. Recent evidence shows superior outcomes for AYA with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) using pediatric rather than adult first line chemotherapy regimens. The aim of this study is to analyze outcomes of umbilical cord blood transplant (UCBT) in AYA patients with ALL or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after myeloablative conditioning regimen (MAC). Eligibility criteria included patients with AL aged 15-25 (median 19) years, transplanted between 2004 and 2016 in EBMT centers, with single or double UCBT as first allogenic transplantation after MAC regimen and reported to Eurocord. A total of 504 patients were included. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Median follow-up for survivors was 38 months (1 month-11 years). Median time from diagnosis to UCBT was 11 months (1 month-17 years) (interquartile range 5-29 months). Diagnosis was ALL in 59% (n=297) and AML in 41% (n=207); 64% of patients were male. Disease status at UCBT were 42% in 1st complete remission (CR) (n=203), 2nd CR in 38% (n=183), and advanced disease in 20% (n=96). Fifty eight percent of patients (n=293) received single and 42% (n=211) double UCBT. Cyclophosphamide + TBI ± fludarabine (45%) was the most frequently used conditioning regimen. Anti-thymoglobulin (ATG) was used in 54% and GVHD prophylaxis was cyclosporine A + mycophenolate mofetil in 44% of patients. Median nucleated cell dose at collection was 3.63 (range 0.9-9.0) X107/Kg for single and 5.25 (range 2.3-10.6) X107/Kg for double UCBT. The 3-year OS was 45±2%; 3-year leukemia free survival (LFS) was 41±2% and refined GVHD free/relapse free survival (rGRFS) was 32±2%. OS was similar in ALL and AML (45±3% vs 45±4%, p-value=0.69). According to disease status at UCBT, 3-year OS was 54±4% for patients in CR1, 48±4% for CR2 and 20±4% for advanced disease (p-value<0.001). Cumulative incidence function (CIF) for neutrophil engraftment at day-60 was 88% [95% confidential interval (CI) 85-90] in a median time of 24 days. CIF of acute GVHD grade II-IV at day-100 was 28% (95%CI 24-32) and out of the 233 patients with aGVHD, 73 (21%) had grade III-IV. The 1-year CIF of chronic GVHD was also 28% (95%CI 24-33) and out of the 124 patients with cGVHD, 52 (42%) had the extensive form. The 3-year CIF of transplant related mortality (TRM) was 31% (95%CI 24-33). The 3-year CIF of relapse was 28% (95%CI 24-32), and according to disease status at UCBT, relapse was 28% (95%CI 21-34) for patients in CR1, 24% (95%CI 18-31) for those in CR2 and 37% (95%CI 27-47) for advanced disease. Main causes of death were relapse (41%) and TRM (57%, mainly infections and GVHD). In multivariate analysis, disease remission at UCBT (HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.32-0.66, p-value<0.001) and transplant performed in more recent years (HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.62-0.90, p-value=0.002) were independently associated with increased OS. A similar effect was observed for LFS (recent transplantation: HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.66-0.95, p-value =0.01 and disease remission: HR 0.51, 95%CI 0.36-0.72, p-value <0.001). On the other hand, negative CMV serology (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.61-0.99, p-value =0.042), recent transplantation (HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.73-0.99, p-value=0.49) and disease remission (HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.44-0.84, p-value =0.002) were significantly associated with increased rGRFS. For grade II-VI aGVHD, ATG use (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.32-0.82, p-value=0.005), single UCBT (HR 0.63, 95%CI 0.42-0.96, p-value=0.03), and recent transplant (HR 0.76, 95%CI 0.59-0.98, p-value=0.034) reduced the risk. However, no factor was associated to cGVHD. This large series of AYA patients with AL provides detailed information on UCBT for this particular cohort with results comparable with other sources of HSCT. Due to the lack of information on pre-transplant chemotherapy (pediatric versus adult protocols), we were unable to evaluate its effect on outcomes. Nevertheless, this study contributes to a better understanding of HSCT for an age group that is not thoroughly described in most publications. Demonstrating the feasibility of UCBT in AYA patients is important to facilitate the decision of stem cell source selection when a more standard donor is not available. Disclosures Hough: University College London Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust: Employment. Angelucci:Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (MA) and CRISPR CAS9 Therapeutics AG (CH): Other: Chair DMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Chair DMC; Jazz Pharmaceuticals Italy: Other: Local ( national) advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Chair Steering Comiittee TELESTO Protocol; Roche Italy: Other: Local (national) advisory board. Bader:Medac: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Neovii: Research Funding; Riemser: Research Funding; Cellgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine and Melphalan (BeEAM) Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Produce a 3-Year Progression-Free Survival Of 75% In Heavily Pre-Treated Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2134-2134
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Visani ◽  
Pietro Maria Stefani ◽  
Saveria Capria ◽  
Lara Malerba ◽  
Piero Galieni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Disease Type ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point

Abstract Background We previously demonstrated (Visani et al, Blood 2011) the safety of a new conditioning regimen with bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BeEAM) prior to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in resistant/relapsed lymphoma patients (EUDRACTnumber2008-002736-15). Furthermore, this regimen showed significant anti-lymphoma activity (80% CR). At the time of publication (2011), disease type (NHL versus HL) and disease status at transplant (chemosensitive versus chemoresistant) were the only statistically significant variables influencing PFS (p=0.01; p=0.007). However, median follow-up for surviving patients was short (18 months), therefore, it was not possible to draw final conclusions on the efficacy. Aims We evaluated the efficacy of the BeEAM regimen in terms of disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after a median follow-up of 41 months. Methods Forty-three patients (median age 47 years, range 18-70) with resistant/relapsed NHL (28) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL, 15) were consecutively enrolled in the study. Twenty-one patients had primary refractory disease, whereas 22 had relapsed disease, 5 of whom where in second or subsequent relapse, at the time of enrolment. The study was designed according to Fleming’s method. The primary objective of the study was to determine the 36-months event free survival rate. We fixed the lowest acceptable rate as 40% and the successful rate as 60%, with a significance level a=0.05 and a power 1-b =0.80. At the time of publication, the median follow-up was 18 months, and therefore it was not possible to establish if we had met the primary end-point of the study. Results we updated the follow-up at 41 months after transplant. Thirty-one out of 43 patients are still in CR (72%), as documented by both PET and CT scan. Two patients with HL were refractory and rapidly died, whereas 10/43 patients (23%) relapsed after a median time of 7.5 months (range:3-23) from transplant. Five patients died (3 NHL, 2 HL), whereas 5 patients are still alive after relapse. Median PFS and OS were still not reached. Conversely, 3-year PFS was 75%, allowing our study to met its primary end-point. Interestingly, disease type (HL versus NHL) at transplant is no longer influencing PFS (p=0.7), and still does not influence OS (p=0.1). On the other hand, disease status at transplant (chemosensitive vs chemoresistant) is still a strong predictor of both PFS and OS (p=0.03 and p=0.009, respectively). At present, one patient developed myelodisplasia after transplant. No other late effects were observed up to now. Conclusions The new BeEAM regimen met the primary end-point of the study and confirms its safety, after 41 months of follow-up. Interestingly, NHL and HL were not statistically different in terms of both PFS and OS at 41 months of observation. These data confirm the high efficacy of this regimen in heavily pretreated non-Hodgkin, as well as Hodgkin lymphoma. Acknowledgments supported in part by AIL Pesaro Onlus. Disclosures: Ocio: Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Array Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Thiotepa-Based Conditioning for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT) in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) - a Survey from the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4316-4316
Author(s):  
Sandra Eder ◽  
Eric Beohou ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Jaime Sanz ◽  
Jürgen Finke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
P Value ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background Thiotepa is an alkylating compound with an effective antineoplastic activity that was used in the past mainly for solid tumors and lymphoma, partially due to its ability to penetrate the blood-brain-barrier. Moreover, beside its myelosupressive activities, thiotepa has immunosuppressive properties making it an attractive agent to be used in the conditioning pre-transplantation. In the current retrospective registry study, we analyzed thiotepa-based conditioning regimen for allo-HSCT in adult patients with ALL using the EBMT ALWP database. Methods Inclusion criteria were: adults with de novo or secondary ALL who underwent first allo-HSCT between 2000 and July 2014 with a thiotepa-based regimen. Donors were either HLA-matched siblings or matched unrelated donors. Haploidentical and cord blood transplantations were excluded as well as patients who received a previous allo-HSCT. Results A total of 323 patients with adult ALL were identified. Median age was 43 years (range, 18 - 76); 59% were males and 41% females. Disease status at allo-HSCT was CR1 in 48.9%, CR2 in 21.7%, CR3 in 6.2% and 23.2% of the patients had an active disease at time of transplant. Transplantation was performed from a HLA-matched sibling (49.8%) or a matched unrelated donor (51.2%). Sixty-five per cent of patients received a myeloablative and 35% a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen, respectively. Stem cell source was peripheral blood stem cells in 84% of the transplants, while 16% received bone marrow grafts. Neutrophil engraftment (defined as >0.5x109/L) was 98% with a median day of 15 (range, 2 - 41). Platelets engraftment (defined as >20x109/L) was 92% with a median day of 14 (range, 7 - 98). Incidence of acute GvHD (Grade> II) was 26.6%, while chronic GvHD occurred in 35.9% at one year (24.6% with extensive disease). With a median follow-up of 16.8 months, the non-relapse mortality was 12.4% and 25.3% at 100 days and one year, respectively. Relapse incidence at 1 year was 33.3%.The one-year leukemia-free survival and overall survival incidences were 57% and 66%. Table 1 shows the outcome according to donor and disease status at time of allo-HSCT. When looking for conditioning regimen more precisely, comparing thiotepa / busulfan ± melphalan (n=213) to thiotepa / other (n=110), higher relapse incidence at one year (34.9% vs 30.3%, p=0.016) and lower leukemia-free survival (38.8% vs 45.9%, p=0.0203), respectively were observed, without difference in non-relapse mortality (23.8% vs 26.3 %, n.s.) and overall-survival (59.6% vs 51.1%, p=0.109). Conclusion This large survey suggests that TTP-based conditioning therapy in adult ALL is feasible and effective, with main outcomes being comparable to literature published results achieved with other regimens. Table 1. Donor LFS,1 year p-value OS,1 year p-value Relapse,100 days Relapse,1 year p-value NRM,100 days NRM,1 year p-value HLA-matchedsibling 49% 0.0262 62% 0.0133 13.1% 31.9% 0.4641 8.7% 18.3% 0.0042 matchedunrelateddonor 33% 46% 15.2% 34.7% 16.2% 32.1% Table 2. Disease status at allo-HSCT LFS,1 year p-value OS,1 year p-value Relapse,100 days Relapse,1 year p-value NRM,100 days NRM,1 year p-value CR1 49% <0.0001 68% <0.0001 6.4% 27.5% 0.0028 7.6% 22.6% 0.1859 CR2+ 33% 40% 21.5% 39% 17% 27.8% Disclosures Mohty: Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Transplant Outcomes in Patients with Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Haploidentical Donors Compared to Matched Sibling Donors and Matched/Mismatched Unrelated Donors: A Retrospective Analysis from the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party (EBMT-CMWP)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3959-3959
Author(s):  
Francesco Onida ◽  
Ge Junran ◽  
Linda Koster ◽  
Rose-Marie Hamladji ◽  
Jennifer Byrne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stem Cell Source ◽  
Cell Source ◽  
Unrelated Donors

Abstract Introduction: The role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) changed profoundly after the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Nevertheless, allo-HCT still represents the preferred treatment option for selected high-risk patients in Europe, with TKI resistance as the most common indication in first chronic phase (CP1). Reported survival outcomes for patients transplanted in CP1 with matched related (MRD), matched unrelated (MUD) and mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) are generally good, but there are no published data on transplants from haploidentical donors (HD). In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare HD outcomes with those using MRD/MUD/MMUD. Patients and Methods: Patients who had received a first allo-HCT for Ph+ CML between 2012 and 2019 were selected from the EBMT database. Following the exclusion of patients transplanted using MRD, MUD, or MMUD and who received post-Cy GvHD prophylaxis, 1686 patients were included in the analysis. The impact of donor type on overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method; the cumulative incidence of relapse (REL) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were estimated as competing events. Univariate comparisons were tested by log-rank or Gray's test, as appropriate. Cox proportional hazard models were applied to compare the risk of OS, RFS, REL and NRM in patients transplanted from MRD, MUD, MMUD and HD, adjusted for baseline disease and transplant characteristics, and to analyze the cause-specific hazard of NRM and REL. Two-sided p values of p&lt;0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Overall, the median age at transplant was 46 years (range 18-74). 62% were male. The median interval from diagnosis to transplant was 17.5 months. Disease status at transplant was CP1 in 43%, CP2 or later in 27%, accelerated phase (AP) in 12%, and blast phase (BP) in 18%. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was ≥90 in 78% of patients. Donor was MRD in 661 patients (39.2%), MUD in 677 (40.2%), MMUD in 212 (12.6%) and HD in 136 (8%). The stem cell source was peripheral blood (PB) in 84% (52% in HD, p&lt;0.001). Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) was used in 33%. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 18 days in HD, and 16 days in MRD/MUD/MMUD transplants. Median time to platelet (&gt;20 x 10 9/L) engraftment was 25 days in HD, 14 days in MRD/ MUD and 15 days in MMUD transplants. 53% of patients were serologically CMV positive pre-transplant. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD at Day +100 was 25%, 27%, 31% and 39% in HD, MRD, MUD and MMUD, respectively (p=0.008). Chronic GvHD at +60 months was observed in 36%, 49%, 40% and 48% in HD, MRD, MUD and MMUD transplants (p=0.006), respectively. With regard to transplant outcomes at 60 months in HD, MRD, MUD and MMUD, OS was 51%, 51%, 62% and 58% (p=0.22), RFS was 42%, 46%, 51% and 45% (p=0.03, Fig.1), REL was 37%, 35%, 28% and 31% (p=0.064), NRM was 21%, 20%, 21% and 24% (p=0.34), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 23%, 22%, 32% and 26% (p&lt;0.001, Fig.2), respectively. By multivariable analyses (1,482 patients included), poorer OS was associated with older age (HR per 10 year increase 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.21, p=0.008), KPS &lt;90 (HR vs ≥90 1.83, 1.51-2.23, p&lt;0.0001), CMV+ status (HR 1.27 1.04-1.55, p=0.02), more advanced disease vs CP1 (p&lt;0.0001); shorter RFS associated with KPS &lt;90 (HR vs ≥90 1.51 1.27-1.80, p&lt;0.0001), RIC (HR vs MAC 1.25, 1.05-1.50, p=0.01), disease status at transplant other than CP1 (overall p&lt;0.0001), and BP vs AP (HR 1.33, 1.01-1.75, p=0.04); higher REL was predicted by KPS &lt;90 (HR 1.54, 1.23-1.93, p&lt;0.0001), RIC (HR vs MAC 1.31, 1.04-1.64, p=0.02) and disease status at transplant ≥CP2 vs CP1 and BP vs AP (p&lt;0.0001); higher NRM was associated with older age (HR per 10 year increase 1.17, 1.05-1.31, p&lt;0.005), KPS &lt;90 (HR 1.47, 1.10-1.96, p&lt;0.001), and PB as stem cell source (HR 1.61, 1.04-2.50, P=0.03). Table 1 shows the hazard ratio of OS, RFS, REL and NRM after transplants in MRD, MUD and MMUD compared to HD. Conclusions: Apart from confirming the stage of disease at transplant as being a major prognostic factor, this study identified a trend to better RFS and GRFS in patients with Ph+ CML transplanted using MUD when compared to MRD/HD/MMUD. These results should be interpreted with caution given the limited number of patients who had HD. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Byrne: Incyte: Honoraria. Apperley: Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte, Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Craddock: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board ; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ganser: Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Hayden: Amgen: Honoraria; Jansen, Takeda: Other: Travel, Accomodation, Expenses. Chalandon: Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Amgen, Jazz, Astra Zenec: Other: Travel EXpenses, Accomodation. Yakoub-Agha: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Effect of Timing and Duration of Maintenance Lenalidomide in Myeloma Patients after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantations

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 194-194
Author(s):  
Idrees Mian ◽  
Denai Milton ◽  
Uday R. Popat ◽  
Nina Shah ◽  
Yago Nieto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
P Value ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Late Initiation

Abstract Introduction: Maintenance lenalidomide after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto HCT) has been shown to improve progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in myeloma patients. In this analysis we sought to determine the impact of lenalidomide treatment on achievement of complete remission (CR), survival and the incidence of secondary primary malignancies (SPM). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all (N=466) consecutive myeloma patients who underwent auto HCT and received maintenance lenalidomide between August 2006 and September 2013 at our institution. Patients received doses of maintenance lenalidomide ranging from 5 mg – 15 mg/day or every other day. We looked at whether lenalidomide improved disease status, specifically CR in patients who had not achieved this before maintenance initiation and the median time to achieve CR. We also analyzed the effects of early initiation (<4-months after auto HCT) of maintenance lenalidomide versus late initiation (≥ 4-months after auto HCT) with regards to PFS and OS using the Kaplan-Meier method. Lastly we assessed if continuation of maintenance therapy beyond 2 and 3-years after auto HCT improved PFS and OS and increased the incidence of SPM. Results: The median follow-up time for all patients was 26.6 months. 173 patients (37%) experienced improvements in their disease status. Of these, 86 patients (50% of those with noted improvements and 19% of total patients assessed) who were not in CR before maintenance achieved CR while on maintenance. The average time to achieve CR in these patients was 12.9 months. Comparing the patients who were started on early maintenance treatment with those who were started on late maintenance therapy, we did not find any difference with regards to PFS (Hazard Ratio [HR]=0.90; p-value=0.57) and OS (HR=0.90; p-value=0.74). However, patients who had been on lenalidomide for > 2 years experienced a significant benefit in OS compared with those on lenalidomide for ≤ 2 years (HR=0.36; p-value=0.0015), although no difference in PFS was observed between the two cohorts (HR=0.77; p-value=0.18). A similar trend in OS was seen for patients who had been on lenalidomide > 3 years compared with those on maintenance treatment ≤ 3 years, though not statistically significant (HR=0.47; p-value=0.10). Again, no difference in PFS was noted between the two groups. Lastly there were only 12 cases of SPM reported in all patients assessed with no statistically significant association to the duration of lenalidomide use. In all 12 cases, lenalidomide was suspended and the mortality among these patients was 50%. Conclusions: Maintenance lenalidomide improves response rates after auto HCT in some patients including the CR rate, however, the median time to achieve CR in these patients is approximately 13 months. The patients who received maintenance therapy for > 2years had a significantly lower risk of death with a trend of improved OS in patients who continued maintenance therapy beyond 3-years. We conclude that the maintenance therapy should be continued for at least 2 years and possibly longer after auto HCT. Table 1 Summary of Survival Outcomes Maintenance Treatment Initiation Measure Early (N=155) Late (N=184) p-value Progression-free survival Hazard ratio (95% CI)a 0.90 (0.63, 1.30) 0.57 Overall survival Hazard ratio (95% CI)a 0.90 (0.49, 1.66) 0.74 Duration of Maintenance Treatment Measure > 2 years (N=115) ≤ 2 years (N=224) p-value Progression-free survival Hazard ratio (95% CI)b 0.77 (0.52, 1.13) 0.18 Overall survival Hazard ratio (95% CI)b 0.36 (0.19, 0.67) 0.0015 > 3 years (N=49) ≤ 3 years (N=290) p-value Progression-free survival Hazard ratio (95% CI)b 0.75 (0.45, 1.26) 0.28 Overall survival Hazard ratio (95% CI)b 0.47 (0.19, 1.15) 0.10 a Cox proportional hazards regression model: measure included as a baseline covariate with the following additional covariates: patient’s cytogenetic risk, creatinine, hemoglobin, B2-microglobulin, ISS stage at diagnosis, disease status at auto HCT, and response prior to auto HCT. b Cox proportional hazards regression model: measure included as a time-dependent covariate with the covariates listed above. Figure 1 Comparison of Overall Survival in Early vs Late initiation of Revlimid Figure 1. Comparison of Overall Survival in Early vs Late initiation of Revlimid Figure 2 Overall Survival – All Patients Figure 2. Overall Survival – All Patients Disclosures Shah: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array: Consultancy, Research Funding. Orlowski:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals High Resolution Donor/Recipient HLA Matching Level in Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Impact on the Transplant Outcome: The Italian Experience on Behalf of GITMO, IBMDR and Aibt

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4642-4642
Author(s):  
Alessandra Picardi ◽  
Nicoletta Sacchi ◽  
Valeria Miotti ◽  
Francesca Lorentino ◽  
Elena Oldani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Hla Matching ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Italian Origin ◽  
Advisory Role

Abstract Introduction: HLA molecules play an important role for immunoreactivity in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). To elucidate the effect and the potential identification of "permissive" and "non permissive" I and II class HLA mismatching (mm) loci on the early and long term transplant outcome, we conducted a retrospective/prospective observational analysis on 1789 patients transplanted with unmanipulated haematopoietic stem cells from a volunteer unrelated donor (URD). Methods Between January 2012 to December 2015, 1789 adult patients with a median age of 49 years (18-70) affected by haematological malignant diseases, performed an unrelated HSCT, coordinated by the Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry (IBMDR). All patients have been typed by high resolution (HR) HLA typing for HLA-A/B/C/DRB1/DQB1 loci, at the start of the donor's search process. Patient and donor characteristics are shown in Table 1. As conditioning regimen and GVHD prophylaxis, 71% of patients received a myeloablative conditioning and 76% a combination of anti-Thymoglobuline, Cyclosporine and Metotrexate short course. Total Body Irradiation was part of conditioning regimen in 14% of cases and PBSC was used as stem cell source in 80% of transplants. Median follow for survivors was 38 months (1-76). Regarding to the allelic compatibility, 890 (50%) of donor/recipient (D/R) pairs were 10/10 HLA matched, 677 (38%) showed 1 mm for A, B, C, DRB1 or DQB1 in 249, 141, 173, 2 and 112 cases, respectively and 222 (12%) received HSCT from a 8/10 or less HLA matched donor. Results: Overall 90% and 79% of patients achieved PMN and PLTS engraftment within 30 and 90 days, respectively. Probabilities of 3-y Overall Survival (3-yr OS), Progression Free Survival (3-yr PFS), and Graft Relapse Free Survival (3-yr GRFS) were 52%, 42%, and 30%, respectively. The 3-y CI of Transplant Related Mortality (TRM) was 26%, with a 100-days CI of acute GVHD ≥2 of 26%, whereas the 3-yr CI of chronic GVHD was 30%, of which 10% extensive. Cox multivariate analysis showed that, compared to 10/10 HLA-matched HSCT, 9/10 and ≤8/10 HLA-matched HSCT were associated with worse outcomes in terms of OS (HR 1.16, p=0.04 and HR 1.3, p=0.007, respectively), GRFS (HR 1.2, p=0.005 and HR 1.2, p=0.07, respectively), TRM (HR 1.3, p=0.007 and HR 1.6, p<0.0001, respectively), grade 3-4 aGVHD (HR 1.8, p=0.0001 and HR 1.8, p=0.01, respectively) and cGvHD (HR 1.3, p=0.005 and HR 1.1, p=0.35, respectively). Notably, no significant differences occurred through the comparison between ≤8/10 and 9/10 matching. Univariate comparisons are shown in Figure 1. Moreover, in order to identify permissive and non permissive allelic mismatching, we analyzed the donor/recipient pairs with a single HLA mm with a frequency > 5%: the presence of A02:01 in the patient's HLA, after adjustment for HLA matching at the other loci and other clinical variables known to affect HSCT outcome, was associated with significant higher risk of TRM (HR 1.9, p= 0.03) and worst OS (HR 1.7, p=0.04). Patient's age > 49 years (p<0.0001), advanced disease stage (p<0.0001), presence of 1 or more co- morbidity according to the Sorror Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-Comorbidity Index (p=0.01) were associated with a hazard risk of 1.4, 2, 1.2 for OS and 1.6, 1.75, 1.4 for TRM. Moreover, the Italian origin of recipient and donor resulted in reduced grade 2-4 acute (HR=0.6, p=0.001) and chronic GVHD (p=0.002, HR=0.4). Finally, the Transplant Program expertise (>10 HSCT/year) is associated with reduced TRM (HR 0.8, p=0.0001), HSCT from female donor to male recipient was associated with higher risk of extensive cGvHD (HR 1.4, p=0.03), and CMV negative/negative status versus other combinations had protective effect on development of grade 3-4 aGVHD (HR 0.56, p=0.04). Conclusions: Our large cohort data of homogeneously treated 1789 URD transplants, show that 10/10 HLA matching remains a significantly favorable prognostic factor for OS, TRM, GRFS and acute/chronic GVHD, whereas there are no significant differences between 8/10 and 9/10 matching transplants. Moreover, the HLA A02:01 as single mm seems to play a "non permissive" role. Finally the Italian origin of recipient and donor is related to a reduced development of GVHD probably due to the matching of the extended MHC haplotypes in individuals of the same geographic origin. Disclosures Rambaldi: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Italfarmaco: Consultancy. Vago:Moderna TX: Research Funding; GENDX: Research Funding. Patriarca:Janssen: Other: Advisory role; Jazz: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; Medac: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; Celgene: Other: Advisory Role; Travel, accommodations, expenses; MSD Italy: Other: Advisory Role.

Similar Survival after Bone Marrow Versus Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation from Matched Unrelated Donors in Children with Hematologic Malignancies.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2066-2066
Author(s):  
Roland Meisel ◽  
Hans-Juergen Laws ◽  
Stephan Balzer ◽  
Benedikt Bernbeck ◽  
Christof Kramm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stem Cell Source ◽  
Detectable Difference ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Recipient Age

Abstract Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are increasingly used instead of bone marrow (BM) for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in children. Prior studies in adults have suggested a comparable outcome with both stem cell sources in matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation. However, relative benefits of PBSC versus BM transplantation may substantially differ in children and adults due to a greater propensity to GvHD in older patients and a higher proliferation rate of blasts in childhood leukemia. Here we present the first comparison of the outcome following PBSC vs. BM transplantation from HLA-matched unrelated donors in an entirely pediatric cohort. Between 1992 and 2004, a total of 61 pediatric patients (pts) with haematologic malignancies underwent PBSC (n=38) or BM (n=23) transplantation from ≥ 5/6 HLA antigen-matched unrelated donors following myeloablative conditioning at our institution. PBSC and BM groups were comparable with regard to GvHD prophylaxis, disease category, disease status at transplant and recipient age, while differences were detected in recipients sex (more male pts in PBSC group, p=0.06), conditioning regimen (more busulfan-based conditioning in PBSC group, p=0.01) and median year of transplant (PBSC transplantations were more recent, p=0.001). Engraftment was achieved significantly faster after PBSC compared to BM transplantation (p=0.001). Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 18 (range: 9–28) and 24 (14–43) days for the PBSC and BM cohort, respectively. The rate of acute GvHD grade III/IV (PBSC vs. BM: 28.9% vs. 19.0%, p=0.54) and chronic GvHD (63.0% vs. 56.3%, p=0.75) was comparable between both groups. While there was a statistically non-significant trend towards increased risk of clinically extensive chronic GvHD following PBSC transplantation (48.1% vs. 25.0%, p=0.2), this did not translate into any detectable difference in treatment-related mortality (PBSC vs. BM: 28.9% vs. 26.1 %) or death of disease (21.7% vs. 21.1%) (p=1.0). With a median follow up of 3.4 years (PBSC) and 10.0 years (BM) overall survival (PBSC vs. BM: 47.5 ± 8.6 % vs. 51.8 ± 10.5 %; p = 0.88) and event-free survival (43.3 ± 8.3 % vs. 51.8 ± 10.5 %; p = 0.60) is without detectable difference between both groups. This result was confirmed in a multivariate analysis including stem cell source, recipient age, recipient sex, conditioning regimen, disease status at transplant and year of transplant as covariates, showing that advanced disease status at transplant is the only significant, independent risk factor for overall mortality (RR 2.4, 95%-CI 1.1–5.2, p=0.02). In conclusion, our data provide evidence that in pediatric recipients of MUD transplantation the use of PBSC instead of BM leads to a faster neutrophil engraftment and a trend towards higher incidence of extensive chronic GvHD. As overall survival and event-free survival is comparable when using PBSC and BM, PBSC is a valid alternate stem cell source for pediatric alloHSCT from MUDs. Supported by the Elterninitiative Kinderkrebsklinik e.V., Duesseldorf

scholarly journals Personalized Risk-Profiling for Acute Leukemia Patients Undergoing Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Study on Behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 24-25
Author(s):  
Joshua A Fein ◽  
Roni Shouval ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Fabio Ciceri ◽  
Emanuele Angelucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prediction Interval ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Training Set ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis

Background: Prediction of patient outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains a tenacious problem. An important limitation of current prediction models is the heterogeneity in outcome even among similar cases. We introduce a novel approach to individualizing estimates of leukemia-free survival (LFS) in acute leukemia patients undergoing haploidentical (haplo) HSCT. Methods: Data were obtained from the registry of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation for all cases of haplo HSCT for acute leukemia performed between 2011 and 2017. Patients receiving ex-vivo T-cell depleted grafts were excluded. Acute myeloid leukemia patients were classified by clinical disease ontogeny (de novo vs. secondary), cytogenetics, and FLT3-ITD/NPM1mut status; acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients by disease status and the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome. Common patient and transplantation parameters including recipient age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), time from diagnosis to transplantation, conditioning and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis were included. Data were split into training and geographic validation sets. Results: A total of 2,001 patients was included in the training set and another 270 in the validation cohort. In the training set, the median age was 50 years; 68% of patients were in complete remission, and 69% had a KPS ≥ 90; 87% received post-transplant cyclophosphamide and 13% antithymocyte globulin for GvHD prophylaxis. To provide the clinician insight on outcomes of similar patients, we developed a descriptive tool to visually explore outcomes of cases with comparable features. We next generated 50 random survival forest models for the prediction of 1-year LFS. In contrast to single point-estimates, the ensemble of 50 models generates a prediction interval accounting for predictive uncertainty. There was heterogeneity of variable importance between models, with either disease status or KPS leading in all models (Figure A). The model was well calibrated (Figure B); the median c-statistic was 0.64 on the validation set. An online interface presents the individual outcomes of the fifteen patients most similar to the index case, the prediction interval, and a visualization of all 50 survival forest predictions. Predictions for a sample patient are shown in Figure (C). Conclusions: We present the first system for individualized prediction of leukemia-free survival following T-cell replete haplo transplantation. A key, novel component of the model, distinguishing it from standard risk scores, is that it provides a measure of predictive certainty. This is essential for judging the robustness of prediction. Our approach is applicable to other clinical settings and can be used for designing risk-guided interventions and for informing patients and clinicians. Figure Disclosures Labopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Blaise:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Sica:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Other: All authors received support for third-party writing assistance, furnished by Scott Battle, PhD, provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland., Research Funding. Mohty:Stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Intravenous Busulfan-Based Conditioning Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adults Patients with AML - An ALWP-EBMT Survey.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1995-1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnon Nagler ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Avichai Shimoni ◽  
Donald Bunjes ◽  
Pedro Pimentel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Oral Busulfan (Bu) is the historical backbone of pre-allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) conditioning regimen. However, oral Bu has an erratic and unpredictable absorption with wide inter and also intra-patient (pt) variability. In contrast, I.V. Busulfan (IV Bu) is with more predictable pharmacokinetics and favorable toxicity profile. In order to assess the impact of the use of IV Bu, the ALWP of the EBMT performed a survey in AML pts who received IV-Bu as part of their pre-alloSCT conditioning regimen. 36 EBMT centers participated in this study: 9 centers performed more than 10 transplants each. Overall, 271 alloSCT were analyzed. Age was 44 (range, 16–67) years. 146 were males (54%) and 125 (46%) were females. Disease status at alloSCT was CR1-53%, CR2-16%, primary refractory-13%, Rel1-12%, Rel2-5% and untreated-1%.77% of the pts were with intermediate, 15% with poor and 8% with good risk cytogenetics, respectively. Median WBC at diagnosis was 26×109/L. Conditioning consisted of IV Bu and cyclophosphamide (IV BuCy) in 52%, IV Bu and fludarabine (IV BuFlu) in 38% and various other IV Bu containing regimens in 10% of the pts, respectively. Overall, conditioning was myeloablative in 80% and reduced-intensity (RIC) in 20% of the alloSCT, respectively. Donors were: identical siblings-59%, matched unrelated-28%, mismatched unrelated-10%, mismatched family donors-2%, syngeneic 1%. 83% of the pts were transplanted with mobilized PBSC grafts while 17% received BM grafts. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of CSA and MTX in 85% of the transplants. With median follow up of 24 (range, 1–66) months, 53% of the pts are alive while 47% have died. Day 100 mortality was 7%. The incidence of veno-occlusive disease of the liver (VOD) was 10.4%. VOD was more frequent in pts that were transplanted from unrelated donors in comparison to those who were transplanted from sibling donors (18% vs. 5%, respectively). It was also more common after myeloablative conditioning than RIC (11.5% vs. 5.5%, respectively). Median age of pts with VOD was 42(17–65) years, not different than the age of the whole group, but they had more advanced disease (primary refrectory-35%, Rel2-30%). Day of onset of VOD was +10(range, 1–162). VOD was severe in only 15% of the pts and only 6 pts died of VOD. All together 30% of the pts with VOD are alive. Overall, alloSCT transplant related mortality (TRM) was 22±4% for pts transplanted at CR1 vs 33±8% for pts transplanted at advanced disease. Similarly, leukemia free survival (LFS) for pts transplanted at CR1 was 55±4% vs. 21+5% for pts transplanted in advanced disease. In summary, IV Bu based conditioning reduced the incidence and severity of VOD post alloSCT for AML as compared to published figures for historical controls. A randomized trial assessing VOD incidence and TRM using IV BuCy vs. IV BuFlu with 2 vs. 4 days of IV Bu, respectively may be indicated.

Outcomes in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients ≥ 60 Years of Age with a Novel Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen Incorporating Extracorporeal Photopheresis,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4153-4153
Author(s):  
Furha I. Cossor ◽  
Sandy Wong ◽  
Kenneth B Miller ◽  
Deborah Black ◽  
Raymond L. Comenzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Extracorporeal Photopheresis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Blood Stem Cells ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Abstract 4153 The optimal preparative regimen for older patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is unclear. We routinely employ a reduced intensity conditioning regimen consisting of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) on days −6 and −5, Pentostatin 4 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion on days −4 and −3, and 600 cGy total body irradiation in 3 divided fractions on days −2 and −1 (“PPT regimen”) for patients greater than 60 years of age (Bone Marrow Transp 2004; 33:881). We now report outcomes of 38 consecutive patients ≥ 60 years old (median 62, range 60–70) (M 22, F 16) transplanted at our center between 1/1/00 and 4/1/11 for hematologic malignancies: AML (n=23), MDS (n=10), ALL (n=1), CLL (n=1), NHL (n=2) and MM (n=1). Twenty-six (68.4%) received matched related and 12 (31.6%) 6/6 matched unrelated donor (MUD) grafts. Twenty-five (65.8%) received marrow and 13 (34.2%) peripheral blood stem cell grafts. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 16 days (3–25). Survival at day 100 was 84% (32/38), with a 13% TRM (5/38) and 3% (1/38) incidence of relapse-related death. Actuarial 1-year overall survival (OS) for all patients was 45% (95% CI 28 – 61%), and median OS in all patients was 10.6 months (95% CI 4.6 – 25.7 months). Estimated 1-year event-free survival, defined as freedom from relapse, progression, or death from any cause, was 44% (95% CI 27 – 59%). Median event-free survival for the entire cohort was 7 months (95% CI 3.6 – 25.6 months). Grade II and grades III/IV acute GvHD (aGvHD) occurred in 8 (21%) and 2 (5%) patients respectively within 1 to 8 weeks of HSCT (median 16 days). After day 100, 6 patients had died, 1 was missing data, and 23 (74% of remaining patients and 60% of the original cohort) had symptoms of GvHD. Fourteen met NIH consensus criteria for chronic GvHD (cGvHD) including 6 with severe classic or overlap cGvHD while 6 had recurrent, 2 persistent and 1 delayed aGvHD. Of those with aGvHD after day 100, 2 patients exhibited ≥ grade III disease. Median time to onset of cGvHD was 4.1 months (3.3 – 11.7). Among patients who received marrow as their stem cell source (n=25), incidence of grades II-IV aGvHD was 32% (24% grade II, 8% grade III/IV), and incidence of any GvHD from day 100 up to date of death or last follow-up was 68%. Among those who received blood stem cells (n=13) incidence of grades II-IV aGvHD was 15% (all grade II) and incidence of GvHD from day 100 until date of death or last follow-up was 83%. There was no statistically significant difference between those who received marrow versus blood stem cells with respect to incidence of either grade II-IV aGvHD or GvHD after day 100 (P =0.27 and 0.36). For those who received MUD transplants (n=12), incidence of grades II-IV aGvHD and of any post-day 100 GvHD were 42% (33% grade II, 8% grade IV) and 75% respectively, and in those who received related donor transplants (n=26) were 19% (15% grade II, 4% grade IV) and 74%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between MUD HSCT versus related donor HSCT patients with regard to grade II-IV aGvHD or GvHD after day 100 (P =0.14 and 0.94). In conclusion, our approach was well tolerated by HSCT patients > 60 years old, provided prompt myeloid recovery and had an acceptable incidence of post-day 100 severe chronic (19%) or > grade II late acute GvHD (6%). Disclosures: Off Label Use: Pentostatin and Extracorporeal photopheresis are not FDA approved for conditioning prior to allogeneic transplant. Comenzo:Elan: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Neotope: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for MDS Patients More Than 70 Years of Age: a Retrospective Study of the MDS Subcommittee of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party (CMWP) of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4390-4390
Author(s):  
Silke Heidenreich ◽  
Dimitris Ziagkos ◽  
Anja van Biezen ◽  
Jürgen Finke ◽  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Remission Status ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Karnofsky Index ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract Introduction Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are diagnosed at median age of 70 years. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment option, but with an increasing age, morbidity escalates. Treatment guidelines suggest HSCT for intermediate-II and high risk constellations up to the age of 65, and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens are commonly used up to 70 years of age. However, increasing life expectancy, availability of RIC regimens and good Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of MDS patients more than 70 years of age, has led to an increased use of HSCT. We performed a retrospective analysis to investigate results after HSCT for those patients and influence of KPS on outcome. Patients and methods We analyzed data of 345 patients in the EMBT database older than 70 years with MDS/sAML. The disease status at transplantation was available in 233 patients and most of the them were in more advanced stage of the disease: RA/RARS,RCMD (n=25) , RAEB (n=68) and RAEB-T/secondary acute leukemia (sAL, n=140). Donor were: related (n=88) and unrelated (n=257). Cytogenetic data were available only in 73 patients and classified as good (58), intermediate (6), poor (5) and very poor (4). Median follow up was 29.7 months. Median age at transplantation was 72 years (70-79 years) with 249 male and 96 female patients. KPS was defined in 300 cases, being 90-100% in 61% and 80% or less in 39%. Stem cell source was peripheral blood (94%) or bone marrow (6%). The intensity of the conditioning regimen was mainly reduced intensity (78%) rather than myeloablative (22%). Negative or positive CMV sero-status of the patient were seen in 35% and 65%, respectively. Results The number of HSCT for MDS patients of 70 years or more has increased over time. While 2000-2004 only 19 patients received transplantation, the following 3-year periods included 28 (2005-2007), 97 (2008-2010) and 200 (2011-2013) patients, respectively. The estimated 3-year OS was 33% (27-39%). A significant better 3 year OS in the univariate analysis was seen for Karnofsky (90-100%) vs 80% or less (41 vs 23%, p=0.008) and for CMV negative sero-status (46% vs 27%, p> <0.001) while disease status, remission status, intensity of the conditioning regimen, and donor source did not influence OS significantly. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 40% (95% CI: 32-48) and significantly lower with unrelated than related donors (24% vs 43%, p =0.004). There was only a trend for a lower incidence of relapse after myeloablative conditioning in comparison to RIC (22% vs 31%, p=0.09), while remission status, T-cell depletion or disease stage did not influence the risk of relapse. The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality at 1 year was 36% (95% CI: 30-42) and significantly influenced by CMV sero-negativity of the recipient (22% vs 38%, p=0.02) and by Karnofsky index 90-100% (29% vs 34% and at 2 years: 32% vs 46%, p=0.01). A trend for lower NRM was seen for related donors (24% vs 35%, p=0.07) and after reduced intensity conditioning (29% vs 41%, p=0.09). No impact on NRM was seen for disease and remission status. In a multivariate analysis (MVA) significant factor for improved OS was Karnofsky index of 90-100% (HR 0.65: 95% CI: 0.48-0.88, p=0.001) and for worse survival CMV sero-positivity (HR 1.61; 95% CI: 1.15-2.21, p<0.001). For relapse the only significant factor was the use of unrelated donors (HR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.32-0.80, p=0.004). Significant factors for NRM in the MVA were Karnofsky index 90-100% (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.42-0.96, p=0.03), CMV sero-positivity of the recipient (HR 1.76; 95% CI: 1.12-2.76, p=0.001) and unrelated donors (HR 1.67; 95% CI: 0.16-2.76, p=0.04). Conclusion HSCT from related or unrelated donor after myeloablative or dose reduced intensity conditioning for advanced MDS patients 70-years and more is a curative treatment option with a 3-year OS of 33%. Good performance, determined by KPS, and sero-negativity for CMV in the patient increase the 3 year estimated overall survival to 41 and 46%, respectively. Disclosures Platzbecker: Boehringer: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Einsele:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Tischer:Sanofi-Aventis: Other: advisory board. Nagler:Novaratis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Glass:Roche, MSD, Takeda, Riemser, Ctilifesciences: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sill:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. de Witte:Novartis: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document