scholarly journals The IMWG Frailty Score and Age Can be More Effective Than Clinical Judgement in the Selection of Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Can Benefit from an Intensive Treatment Approach with High Dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2151-2151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Belotti ◽  
Rossella Ribolla ◽  
Valeria Cancelli ◽  
Nicola Bianchetti ◽  
Claudia Crippa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Clinical Judgement ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Frailty Score ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has proven effective in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients (pts) aged <65. However in several studies ASCT has proven safe and effective also in selected MM pts aged >65. With the increase of treatment options, several geriatric assessment tools have been proposed to help physicians in selecting treatment of appropriate intensity. However specific criteria for evaluating ASCT eligibility in elderly MM pts have been seldom investigated.Patients and Methods: From January 2013 to December 2017 131 consecutive newly diagnosed symptomatic MM pts aged 65-75 (M/F: 66/65) were considered for ASCT at our center according to physician's clinical judgement. The variables included in Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI), and International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty score were not considered for selection but were retrieved for this study and pts were classified accordingly. Of note, ADL and IADL were referred to pts status prior the occurrence of MM related symptoms. The impact of age and the predictive role of the above mentioned scores on progression-free survival (PFS) of pts selected or not for ASCT was analyzed. Pts characteristics are shown in Table 1. Results: Of 131 pts, 85 (65%) were judged transplant eligible (ASCT ITT arm) by the clinician and received bortezomib-based induction (VTD 94%, VD 5%, VCD 1%); 72 of them (85%) actually underwent ASCT (70% single, 30% double) with melphalan conditioning 200 mg/sqm in 68% of cases. The 46 pts considered ineligible to ASCT received a less intensive first line treatment (89% VMP, 4% Daratumumab-VMP, 2% MP, 5% steroids/palliation). Complete remission (CR) after the first ASCT was higher in the ASCT (ITT) vs the NO ASCT group (43,5% vs 26%, respectively; p 0.048), whereas ORR and ³VGPR rates were comparable (83% vs 74% and 76,4% vs 61%, respectively). Transplant related mortality (TRM) was 0%. 2 year death rate was 13% in the ASCT (ITT) arm and was due to PD in 91% of cases (the latter 9% concerns a cardiac arrest secondary to aspiration pneumonia in a pt in VGPR 3 months after first ASCT). After a median follow-up of 27 months, PFS was 35,6 in the ASCT (ITT) group vs 19,9 months in NO ASCT pts, respectively; p 0,013, HR 0,42 (95% CI: 0,25-0,71). HCT-CI was ≥2 in 87% of pts overall. PFS was better in pts with HCT-CI 0-1 compared to HCT≥2 (NR vs 27,3 months; p 0,025, HR 0,45, 95% CI 0,23-0,91) and also in pts with HCT-CI ³2 undergoing ASCT (ITT) than in NO ASCT pts: median 34 vs 19,9 months, p 0,008 (HR 0,5, 95%CI 0,30-0,84). CCI was 0-3 in 78% of pts. Their outcome according was similar to pts with CCI >3 but ASCT performed better than NO ASCT also in the few (median PFS 51,4 vs 16,9 months; p 0,04, HR 0,37, 95%CI 0,15-0,95). IMWG frailty score was more useful. No pts classified as FRAIL had been considered eligible to ASCT by clinical decision with a significantly worse outcome compared to FIT and UNFIT pts (median PFS: 7,9 months vs 32,9 and 29,6; FIT vs FRAIL: p < 0.0001, HR 0,02, 95%CI 0,004-0,008; UNFIT vs FRAIL: p < 0,001, HR 0,03 95%CI 0,007-0,12). Unlike HCT-CI and CCI, the distribution of patients according to IMWG score was more balanced both overall and between the ASCT (ITT) and NO ASCT groups, particularly for UNFIT pts. However on the whole no outcome differences were observed between FIT and UNFIT pts. PFS was better in FIT&UNFIT pts in the ASCT (ITT) group than in the NO ASCT group: median 35,6 months vs 25,8 months; p 0,04, HR 0,54, 95%CI 0,31-0,97. However, in the ASCT (ITT) group, the age group 65-69 years fared better than pts ³70 years (51,5 vs 27,7 months, p 0,0037; HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.7). Indeed, in IMWG UNFIT patients aged ³70, the PFS of the ASCT (ITT) group was comparable to NO ASCT group (18 vs 27 months, p 0,33) whereas in UNFIT pts aged 65-69, PFS was superior in pts treated more intensively by physician choice: 43,3 months in ASCT (ITT) arm vs 18,4 months in NO ASCT (p 0.01, HR 0.03; 95%CI 0.003-0.24). Conclusion: In an unselected series of elderly MM pts aged 65-75 and undergoing ASCT according to clinical judgement the outcome of ASCT pts was better than those of NO ASCT. CCI and HCT-CI score proved of little help for better identifying the best candidates to ASCT. Conversely the IMWG frailty score would be of help in identifying the category of UNFIT pts aged 70-75 whose outcome with ASCT selected by clinical judgement was no better than with less intensive treatments. Table 1: Disclosures Belotti: Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board. Cattaneo:GILEAD: Other: Advisory Board. Rossi:TEVA: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; CELGENE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; SANOFI: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; MUNDIPHARMA: Honoraria; ABBVIE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; JANNSEN: Other; PFIZER: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; ROCHE: Other: Advisory Board; NOVARTIS: Honoraria; SANDOZ: Honoraria; GILEAD: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; BMS: Honoraria; JAZZ: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; AMGEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD.

Upfront stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with del(17p) and t(4;14): a study from the CMWP-EBMT

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-217
Author(s):  
Nico Gagelmann ◽  
Diderik-Jan Eikema ◽  
Liesbeth C. de Wreede ◽  
Alessandro Rambaldi ◽  
Simona Iacobelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed

Prospective, Randomized Study of Single Compared With Double Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Bologna 96 Clinical Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (17) ◽  
pp. 2434-2441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Cavo ◽  
Patrizia Tosi ◽  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
Claudia Cellini ◽  
Paola Tacchetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Prospective Randomized Study ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
To Receive

Purpose We performed a prospective, randomized study of single (arm A) versus double (arm B) autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for younger patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods A total of 321 patients were enrolled onto the study and were randomly assigned to receive either a single course of high-dose melphalan at 200 mg/m2 (arm A) or melphalan at 200 mg/m2 followed, after 3 to 6 months, by melphalan at 120 mg/m2 and busulfan at 12 mg/kilogram (arm B). Results As compared with assignment to the single-transplantation group (n = 163 patients), random assignment to receive double ASCT (n = 158 patients) significantly increased the probability to attain at least a near complete response (nCR; 33% v 47%, respectively; P = .008), prolonged relapse-free survival (RFS) duration of 18 months (median, 24 v 42 months, respectively; P < .001), and significantly extended event-free survival (EFS; median, 23 v 35 months, respectively; P = .001). Administration of a second transplantation and of novel agents for treating sequential relapses in up to 50% of patients randomly assigned to receive a single ASCT likely contributed to prolong the survival duration of the whole group, whose 7-year rate (46%) was similar to that of the double-transplantation group (43%; P = .90). Transplantation-related mortality was 3% in arm A and 4% in arm B (P = .70). Conclusion In comparison with a single ASCT as up-front therapy for newly diagnosed MM, double ASCT effected superior CR or nCR rate, RFS, and EFS, but failed to significantly prolong overall survival. Benefits offered by double ASCT were particularly evident among patients who failed at least nCR after one autotransplantation.

Up-Front Therapy for Multiple Myeloma: A Survey of Practice Patterns in the USA.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5172-5172
Author(s):  
Kavita Natarajan ◽  
Gary H. Lyman ◽  
Oscar F. Ballester
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Choice Of Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Several treatment programs are available for the initial management of patients with multiple myeloma, with no clear documented advantage(s) of one regimen over the others in terms of time to progression (TTP) or overall survival (OS). Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to 540 randomly selected members of ASH during early 2005. Practitioners were asked their choice of therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma patients during 2004, based on 2005 NCCN guidelines, including: 1) melphalan/prednisone (MP), 2) vincristine / adriamycin / decadron (VAD), 3) high-dose decadron (HD), 4) thalidomide / decadron (Thal/Dex), 5) doxyl / vincristine / decadron (DVD); the options of a clinical trial (CT) or “other” were also included. Physicians were asked about factors influencing their choice of therapy for individual patients and their recommendations for autologous stem cell transplantation as part of the initial treatment schema. Results: Surveys were returned by 123 physicians(19.2%), of which 93 contained evaluable data. Among responders, 52% were in private practice and 47% in academic institutions and 74% respondants reporting having been in practice for more than 10 years. A large majority of physicians (74%) utilized 3 or more different regimens, only 10.7% of responders used a single regimen for all of their patients. Thal/Dex was used by 87% of responders, with 47% of them recommending this regimen in ≥ 50% of their patients. MP, HD and VAD were used by 67.7%, 49% and 44% of responders, but only 10.7%, 4% and 3% respectively, recommended them to ≥ 50% of their patients. DVD was used by 25% of physicians. Of respondants, 64.5% did not accrued patients to clinical trials and only 7.5% of physicians accrued ≥ 50% of their patients to clinical trials. No significant differences in the choice of regimen were apparent based on years of practice. Physicians in academic centers tended to use HD (p =.002) and accrue patients to CT (p=. 001) more often than those in private practice. Factors identified as important in selecting initial therapy for individual patients included: age (92%); performance status (95%); prognostic factors, such as β2-microglobulin and cytogenetics (75%); and candidacy for stem cell transplantation (93%). Respondants consider autologous stem cell transplantation as part of the initial therapy for all eligible patients (47%), only those with responsive disease (42%) and normal renal function (30%); only in selected cases (76%). Conclusions: Thal/Dex appears to be currently the most commonly recommended up-front therapy for multiple myeloma in the USA, in spite of the lack of published data documenting patient benefit in terms of TTP and OS. A sizable proportion of physicians do not recommend autologous stem cell transplantation as part of the initial therapy of newly diagnosed myeloma patients despite confirmed randomized clinical trials documenting benefit.

Sequential VAD (Vincristine, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) and VTD (VELCADE®, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone) Induction Followed by High-Dose Therapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Maintenance Treatment with VELCADE for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results of Phase II Trial.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 952-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Hye Jin Kim ◽  
Dong Soon Lee ◽  
Hyeon Seok Eom ◽  
Jun Ho Jang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed

Abstract Introduction Effective reduction of myeloma before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) prolongs survival in multiple myeloma patients. Recently, incorporation of novel agents resulted in improved response rate and reduced side effect in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Method: Patients are planned to receive 2 cycles of VAD (vincristine 0.4mg D1-4, adriamycin 9mg/m2 D1-4, dexamethasone 40mg D1-4, 9–12 every 3 weeks), and VTD (bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 D1, 4, 8, 11, thalidomide 100mg daily, dexamethasone 40mg D1-4, 9–12 every 3 weeks). High dose melphalan (200mg/m2) is used as a conditioning regimen for ASCT. Bortezomib (1.3mg/m2) as a maintenance treatment is administered weekly x 4 times every 6 weeks for 4 cycles after ASCT. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria, with additional category of nCR. Adverse events were graded by the NCI-CTCAE, Version 3.0. Result: At this interim analysis, 60 patients have been entered into the ongoing trial, and efficacy could be assessed in 53 patients. After 2 cycles of VAD, response rate was 70%. After VTD, two patients showed further improvement with additional CR, and an overall response was 97% with 14% CR. Especially, patients with poor prognostic cytogenetics (n=6) all responded after VTD. So far, autologous stem cells were successfully collected in all 28 patients with a median CD34+ count of 7.8 x 106/kg (range, 2.17–44.7 x 106/kg). In 24 patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation, five patients gained additional CR. There was no progression in patients completed bortezomib maintenance (n=9, CR 77%). The median follow-up duration was 6 months, median time to response was 1.4 months, and median overall survival was not reached. Grade 3,4 hematologic toxicity was more frequently observed after VAD than VTD (anemia 15.8%, 4.6%, neutropenia 7.9%, 3.5%), and incidence of grade 2,3 peripheral neuropathy was low (VAD 3.5%, VTD 7%). Conclusion: Sequential VAD and VTD induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma was highly effective, even in patients with poor prognostic cytogenetics, and did not prejudice stem cell collection. VTD could have contributed to increased RR and minimized side effects. An updated results will be presented at the ASH meeting. *Protocol Number: KMM51-NCT00378755.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document