scholarly journals Phase 1 Studies Assessing the Safety and Clinical Activity of Multiple Doses of a NKG2D-Based CAR-T Therapy, Cyad-01, in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1398-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason B. Brayer ◽  
David A Sallman ◽  
Tessa Kerre ◽  
Xavier Poire ◽  
Violaine Havelange ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Nkg2d Ligand ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T ◽  
Ligand Expression ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction: CYAD-01 is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) product based on the receptor NKG2D which demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy through different mechanisms of action in numerous preclinical models. A comprehensive clinical program was developed with the aim to define the optimal CYAD-01 treatment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods: The ongoing Phase I THINK trial (NCT03018405) evaluates multiple CYAD-01 injections in 2 parallel cohorts: one in patients (pt) with metastatic solid tumors and the other one in relapsing/refractory hematological malignancies. The dose escalation segment of the study evaluates 3 dose levels (DL; 3x108, 1x109 and 3x109 cells per injection) of one cycle of 3 CYAD-01 administration at 2 weeks apart. As of July 30, 2018, 12 pts in the THINK hematological cohort (8 AML, 3 MM and 1 MDS) have been enrolled at the 3 DLs without prior preconditioning. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred. We evidenced promising anti-leukemic activity with 42% ORR in r/r AML with 5/7 pts having clinical benefit. Based on the initial data generated into the THINK study, two additional Phase I clinical trials have been developed to evaluate 3 DLs (1x108, 3x108 and 1x109 cells per injection) post preconditioning regimen or in association with standard of care (SoC). The DEPLETHINK study (NCT03466320) aims at evaluating the CYAD-01 treatment administered after a cyclophosphamide and fludarabine preconditioning regimen to r/r AML patients. The preconditioning chemotherapy should (i) favor the expansion and engraftment of CYAD-01, (ii) increase NKG2D ligand expression on tumor cells and (iii) help to overcome the strong immunosuppressive microenvironment. The EPITHINK study (EudraCT 2018-000745-39) aims at assessing the safety of the CYAD-01 treatment administered concurrently with SoC 5-azacytidine treatment in treatment-naïve AML pts ineligible for intensive treatment. Similar to the preconditioning treatment, the epigenetic treatment could contribute to favor engraftment of CYAD-01 cells and increase target antigen expression while better controlling the disease progression of patients early in the treatment. Results: Description of the study design and preliminary clinical data from the first cohorts of the EPITHINK and DEPLETHINK studies will be presented. The preliminary data in term of CYAD-01 engraftment kinetics, NKG2D ligand expression (including blasts and soluble ligands), and the kinetics of cytokine induction will be correlated with the concurrent treatment (preconditioning or epigenetic treatment) versus the stand alone therapeutic approach. Conclusions: We have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of multiple injections of CYAD-01 without preconditioning chemotherapy (THINK). Preliminary safety, activity and correlative science data will be presented according a prior preconditioning (DEPLETHINK) and concurrent administration with SoC epigenetic treatment (EPITHINK). Disclosures Sallman: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kerre:BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celyad: Consultancy. Wang:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Speakers Bureau. Selleslag:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Financial support for study-related issues. Beguin:Kiadis Pharma: Consultancy. Al-Homsi:Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dekker:Celyad: Employment. Breman:Celyad: Employment. Sotiropoulou:Celyad: Employment. Snykers:Celyad: Employment. Braun:Celyad: Employment. Lonez:Celyad: Employment. Verma:Celyad: Employment. Lehmann:Celyad: Employment, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties; GSK: Patents & Royalties. Davila:Celyad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Remissions in Relapse/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Following Treatment with NKG2D CAR-T Therapy without a Prior Preconditioning Chemotherapy

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 902-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A Sallman ◽  
Tessa Kerre ◽  
Xavier Poire ◽  
Violaine Havelange ◽  
Philippe Lewalle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T ◽  
Ligand Expression ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction: CYAD-01 is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) product based on the receptor NKG2D with specificity for a broad range of ligands (MICA, MICB and ULBP1-6) expressed on most tumors. In vivo preclinical studies showed long-term anti-tumor activity of CYAD-01, whilst not only targeting tumor cells but also cells from the tumor neo-vasculature and immunosuppressive environment in the absence of pre-conditioning therapy. Methods: Exploiting this unique mode of action of CYAD-01, the THINK trial (NCT03018405) is an open-label Phase I study assessing the safety and clinical activity of multiple CYAD-01 administrations without prior preconditioning in 2 parallel cohorts: one in patients (pt) with metastatic solid tumors and the other one in hematological malignancies, including relapsing/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), multiple myeloma (MM) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The dose escalation segment of the study evaluates 3 dose levels (DL; 3x108, 1x109 and 3x109 cells per injection) of one cycle of 3 CYAD-01 administration with 2-weeks intervals. The study has been amended at the stage of DL-2 to authorize a second cycle of 3 CYAD-01 administrations in case of no progressive disease after 2 months. Results: As of July 31, 2018, 12 pts in the hematological cohort (8 AML, 3 MM and 1 MDS) have been enrolled at the 3 DLs (6 pts in DL-1, 3 in DL-2 and 3 in DL-3) without prior preconditioning. Median age was 64 (range 29-83) and median number of prior therapies was 3. DL-3 (3 pts) has been fully accrued as of data cutoff. Over 34 injections, 5 pts experienced grade (G) 3/4 treatment-related AEs: in DL-1, one pt experienced G3 lymphopenia and a second pt experienced G4 lymphopenia and G4 pneumonitis in DL-2, one pt experienced G3 lymphopenia and G3 thrombocytopenia and two other pts experienced G3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Treatment related AEs occurring in ≥ 1pt include pyrexia, CRS, hypoxia, lymphopenia, fatigue and nausea. CRS occurred in 5 pts, three G1/2 and two G3 AEs, with rapid resolution to appropriate treatment including tocilizumab. No neurotoxicity AEs have been observed to date. Out of the 8 r/r AML pts enrolled, 7 were response evaluable (2 at DL-1, 3 at DL-2 and 2 at DL-3). The third DL-3 pt has just initiated the first cycle of CYAD-01 treatment. Overall response rate in r/r AML pts was 42% (3/7 patients) with 1 complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) in DL-1 and 2 CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi; 1 in DL-1 and 1 in DL-3). All responding pts achieved response by day 29 (i.e. after 2 CYAD-01 administrations). The AML pt with CRh in DL-1 was bridged to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on day +97 post CYAD-01 and is in durable complete molecular remission (CRMRD-) for more than 1 year (ongoing). The two other responding pts had CRi for 1 month. Two other AML patients at DL-2 had clinical benefit/disease stabilization with hematologic improvement and bone marrow blasts decrease: one pt for 3 months and with a decrease from 24% to 10% and the second pt for at least 4 months (ongoing) and with a decrease from 9.8% to 5.5%. The first patient in CRh had a relative increase in the systemic levels of SDF-1, RANTES and MCP-1 which correlated with the timing of injections. CYAD-01 engraftment kinetics, NKG2D ligand expression (including blasts and soluble ligand expression), and the kinetics of cytokine induction will be correlated with patient's responses. The 3 MM and the MDS pt, all in DL-1, did not present any sign of clinical activity. Conclusions: We have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of multiple injections of CYAD-01 without preconditioning chemotherapy. We evidenced promising anti-leukemic activity with 42% ORR in r/r AML with 5/7 pts having clinical benefit. Rates of G3/4 CRS were low and manageable. Updated safety, activity and correlative science data of the complete dose-escalation segment will be presented. Disclosures Sallman: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kerre:Celyad: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Davila:Celyad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wang:Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dekker:Celyad: Employment. Snykers:Celyad: Employment. Sotiropoulou:Celyad: Employment. Breman:Celyad: Employment. Braun:Celyad: Employment. Lonez:Celyad: Employment. Verma:Celyad: Employment. Lehmann:GSK: Patents & Royalties; Celyad: Employment, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties.

scholarly journals Interim Results from the Phase I Deplethink Trial Evaluating the Infusion of a NKG2D CAR T-Cell Therapy Post a Non-Myeloablative Conditioning in Relapse or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3844-3844
Author(s):  
A. Samer Al-Homsi ◽  
Enkhtsetseg Purev ◽  
Philippe Lewalle ◽  
Maher Abdul-Hay ◽  
Daniel A Pollyea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T ◽  
Acute Myeloid

CYAD-01 cells are engineered T-cells expressing a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) based on the natural full-length human natural killer group 2D (NKG2D) receptor fused to the intracellular domain of CD3ζ. NKG2D binds to 8 ligands (MICA, MICAB, and ULBP1-6) over-expressed by a large variety of malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Phase I DEPLETHINK study (NCT03466320) evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy of a single CYAD-01 infusion (inf.) after lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) AML and MDS. A second cycle of 3 CYAD-01 infusions without preconditioning could be administered in absence of progressive disease (PD) following the 1st infusion. Three dose-levels (DLs; 1x108, 3x108 and 1x109 cells/inf.) are evaluated in the dose escalation segment. The first DL is also evaluated at two different intervals between preconditioning and CYAD-01 infusion (T7: seven days interval; T3: three days interval) in order to mitigate for any potential increased toxicity due to the administration of lymphodepletion. As of end of July 2019, 6 patients (4 AML and 2 MDS) were enrolled in the first 2 cohorts which evaluated DL1 (1x108 cells/inf. at T3 or T7) and 3 patients (3 AML) were enrolled in the cohort 3 evaluating DL2 (3x108 cells/inf. at T3). The blasts in the bone marrow of 8 out of 9 patients ranged between 3% and 48% at baseline. Of the 6 patients treated at DL1 (with lymphodepletion administered up to 7 or 3 days before first CYAD-01 infusion), 3 patients experienced grade (G) 1 toxicity (cytokine release syndrome or CRS and diarrhea), or G2 CRS (uncleaned database). The patient with G2 CRS following the first infusion also experienced G4 CRS and G3 CAR T-cell-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES) during the second inf. at 3x109 cells/inf. One other patient experienced G1 CRS during the second cycle. At DL2, only 1 patient experienced G1 related AEs (diarrhea and CRS) after the first CYAD-01 infusion. Another patient experienced G3 CRS during the second cycle. All patients recovered with treatment including tocilizumab and, when indicated, steroids. At DL1, two out of 5 evaluable patients reached a stable disease (SD) at day (d) 36, allowing the initiation of the 2nd cycle. At DL2, one patient out of 3 reached SD. The DEPLETHINK study is currently enrolling at DL3 (T3). Preliminary correlative studies show that the area under the curve at d36 (AUC D1-D36) after a single infusion of CYAD-01 with prior lymphodepletion is better than without preconditioning. Furthermore, the T3 interval between the preconditioning and CYAD-01 provides better engraftment than the T7 interval. In conclusion, to date, the results demonstrate the safety and tolerability for CYAD-01 doses 1x108 and 3x108 cells/infusion with a prior lymphodepletion in patients with r/r AML and MDS. The T3 interval was therefore chosen for further CYAD-01 evaluations. The improved persistence of CYAD-01 with lymphodepletion, in particular 3 days before infusion, could lead to improved clinical responses. The study is ongoing and further data will be provided at the meeting. Disclosures Al-Homsi: Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abdul-Hay:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Pollyea:Diachii Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celyad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lequertier:Celyad: Employment. Alcantar-Orozco:Celyad: Employment. Borghese:Celyad: Employment. Lonez:Celyad: Employment. Braun:Celyad: Employment. Renard:Celyad: Employment. Flament:Celyad: Employment.

scholarly journals First-in-Human Phase I Dose Escalation and Expansion Study Evaluating the Fc Optimized FLT3 Antibody Flysyn in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Minimal Residual Disease

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
Jonas S. Heitmann ◽  
Daniela Dörfel ◽  
Sabine Kayser ◽  
Michael Heuser ◽  
Felicitas Thol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Musculoskeletal Symptoms ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Even when achieving morphological complete remission (CR) after induction therapy, roughly half of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients display measurable residual disease (MRD) and eventually relapse. The surface receptor FLT3/CD135 is expressed on AML cells in almost all patients and constitutes a highly selective target antigen for immunotherapy, as expression on healthy tissues is limited to low levels on dendritic cells, monocytes and hematopoietic progenitor cells. FLYSYN is a chimeric Fc-optimized IgG1 antibody that binds specifically and with high avidity to human FLT3 (CD135). Here we report updated results of an open-label, single-arm, first in man multicenter trial (recruitment March 2017 to March 2020) evaluating safety/tolerability and preliminary efficacy of FLYSYN in patients with AML (NCT02789254). Morphological CR with stable or increasing MRD in two sequential measurements using central RT-qPCR and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) constituted the main inclusion criterion. FLYSYN was administered i.v. over 3 h as single application in cohorts 1-5 (0.5 mg/m², 1.5 mg/m², 5 mg/m², 15 mg/m², 45 mg/m²); in cohort 6, 15 mg/m² were applied on day 1, 15 and 29. Three patients were treated per cohort except for cohorts 4 and 6, which were expanded to comprise 9 and 10 patients, respectively. Molecular response was defined as >1 log MRD reduction or negativity in bone marrow (BM). In total, 31 patients (median age 58 years; range, 21-80 years; male:female ratio: 1:1.8) were enrolled, of which 27, 3 and 1 were MRD-positive for mutated NPM1, mutated IDH2 and RUNX1-RUNX1T1, respectively. Based on pharmacokinetic analysis, the half-life of FLYSYN was estimated to be 6.5 days. In 8 patients (26%), a transient decrease of neutrophil count (2 adverse events (AEs) grade 3, others ≤ grade 2) was observed. No relevant effect on stem cell reserve as assessed by colony forming unit assays was detected in the so far analyzed 26 patients. No other AE > grade 2 or dose-limiting toxicity were observed. The most frequent AEs were unspecific and comprised fatigue and flu like symptoms (12%), musculoskeletal symptoms (8%) and laboratory abnormalities (42%). With regard to efficacy, molecular response to treatment was achieved in 11/31 patients (35%), with so far two patients achieving MRD negativity documented one year after treatment. Among the patients receiving 45 mg/m2 FLYSYN (in total, upon single or repetitive dosing), objective responses were achieved in 46% (6/13) cases, whereas 28% (5/18) responded to treatment with lower doses. Together, the results of our phase I trial demonstrate that FLYSYN is safe and very well tolerated as monotherapy in AML patients with molecular MRD. Early efficacy data are promising and warrant further evaluation in an up-coming phase II clinical trial. Disclosures Heuser: PriME Oncology: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Astellas: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BerGenBio ASA: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. Thol:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kapp-Schwoerer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Grosse-Hovest:Synimmune: Current Employment. Steiner:Synimmune: Current Employment. Schlenk:Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; PharmaMar: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Salih:Pfizer: Consultancy; Medigene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Philogen: Consultancy; Synimmune: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Ameli-01: Phase I, Open Label Dose-Escalation and Dose-Expansion Study to Evaluate the Safety, Expansion, Persistence and Clinical Activity of UCART123 (allogeneic engineered T-cells expressing anti-CD123 chimeric antigen receptor), Administered in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 41-42
Author(s):  
Gail J. Roboz ◽  
Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽  
David A. Sallman ◽  
Monica L. Guzman ◽  
Pinkal Desai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grant Support ◽  
Car T ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of acute leukemia in adults, with an incidence that increases with age, and a generally poor prognosis. The prognosis remains especially grim for those who are older, have secondary AML, or relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease, in which 5-year OS is 5-10%. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are needed. CD123(IL3Rα) is a cell surface target that is expressed on normal, committed hematopoietic progenitor cells, and a variety of hematological neoplasms, including AML, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN). UCART123 is genetically modified, allogeneic ("off-the-shelf"), anti-CD123 CAR T cell product candidate in which the TCR alpha constant gene is disrupted to reduce the risk of GvHD, and the CD52 gene is disrupted to permit the use of alemtuzumab for selective and prolonged host lymphodepletion. Also, the CAR is co-expressed with a suicide mechanism (RQR8), which can be activated by using rituximab. In vitro data have demonstrated that UCART123 efficiently targets primary AML cells, with minimal effect on normal progenitors. Also, in PDX mouse models of AML, UCART123 cells can eliminate tumor cells in vivo, prevent relapse, and improve survival; in a competitive BM/AML PDX model, UCART123 cells demonstrated preferential targeting of AML blasts (Guzman; Blood 2016). Methods: AMELI-01 is a phase 1, multi-center clinical trial of UCART123 that employs an mTPI design to evaluate the safety, tolerability and preliminary anti-leukemia activity of UCART123 in patients (pts) with R/R AML. Additional objectives include determination of the MTD; characterization of the expansion, trafficking and persistence of UCART123; assessment of cytokine, chemokine and CRP levels after UCART123 infusion; and assessment of immune cell depletion, reconstitution and immune response. Dose escalation will include up to 28 pts. The dose expansion portion follows a Simon 2-stage design and will enroll up to an additional 37 pts. Eligible pts must be ≤ 65 years of age with R/R AML, adequate organ function, a confirmed donor for potential back-up stem cell transplantation, and no ongoing > G1 toxicity from prior treatment. Pts with APL, prior gene or cellular therapy, > 1 allogeneic SCT, or those with a clinically relevant CNS disorder (including CNS leukemia) are not eligible. Pts receive a lymphodepletion (LD) regimen of either fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) or fludarabine, cyclophosphamide plus alemtuzumab (FCA) starting on Day -5, followed by an infusion of UCART123 at one of 5 dose levels on Day 0. Pts are evaluated for the presence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during a 28-day observation period, which extends to 42 days in the setting of marrow aplasia and/or persistent clinically significant cytopenias without residual AML. DL1 has cleared safety without DLT, and enrollment at the next dose levels are proceeding. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03190278 Monica L. Guzman, et al; Allogeneic TCRα/β Deficient CAR T-Cells Targeting CD123 Prolong Overall Survival of AML Patient-Derived Xenografts. Blood 2016; 128 (22): 765. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V128.22.765.765 Disclosures Roboz: Orsenix: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Jasper Therapeutics: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Array BioPharma: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy. DeAngelo:Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Autolos: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy. Sallman:Agios, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celyad Oncology, Incyte, Intellia Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Novartis, Syndax: Consultancy; Celgene, Jazz Pharma: Research Funding. Guzman:SeqRx: Honoraria; Cellectis: Research Funding. Kantarjian:Delta Fly: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive biotechnologies: Honoraria; Ascentage: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Research Funding; BioAscend: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Oxford Biomedical: Honoraria; Immunogen: Research Funding; Aptitute Health: Honoraria. Konopleva:Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann La-Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Kisoji: Consultancy; Ablynx: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceutical Inc.;: Patents & Royalties: patents and royalties with patent US 7,795,305 B2 on CDDO-compounds and combination therapies, licensed to Reata Pharmaceutical; Calithera: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding. Bejanyan:Kiadis Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Esteva:Cellectis: Current Employment. Garton:Cellectis: Current Employment. Backhouse:Cellectis: Current Employment. Galetto:Cellectis: Current Employment. Brownstein:Cellectis: Current Employment. Pemmaraju:Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria; Roche Diagnostics: Honoraria; MustangBio: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Other: Grant Support; Plexxikon: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Stemline Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Affymetrix: Other: Grant Support, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria; DAVA Oncology: Honoraria; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Pacylex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Ixazomib with Conventional Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Philip C. Amrein ◽  
Eyal C. Attar ◽  
Geoffrey Fell ◽  
Traci M. Blonquist ◽  
Andrew M. Brunner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Outcomes for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) among older patients has remained largely unchanged for decades. Long-term survival for patients aged >60 years is poor (median survival 10.5 months). Targeting the proteasome in AML is attractive, since leukemia stem cells have demonstrated sensitivity to proteasome inhibition in preclinical models, perhaps through down regulation of nuclear NF-KB (Guzman, Blood 2001). AML cell lines are susceptible to synergistic cytotoxicity when bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is combined with daunorubicin and cytarabine. We have shown that adding bortezomib to standard treatment in AML results in a high remission rate, although grade 2 sensory neurotoxicity was noted in approximately 12% of treated patients. A newer generation proteasome inhibitor, ixazomib, is less frequently associated with neurotoxicity, and, therefore, was selected for combination with conventional chemotherapy in this phase I trial. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib in combination with conventional induction and consolidation chemotherapy for AML. Herein are the initial results of this trial. Methods: Adults >60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML were screened for eligibility. Patients with secondary AML were eligible, including those with prior hypomethylating agent therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We excluded those with promyelocytic leukemia. There were 2 phases in this study. In the first phase (A), the induction treatment consisted of the following: cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day by continuous IV infusion, Days 1-7; daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/day IV, Days 1, 2, 3, and ixazomib was provided orally at the cohort dose, Days 2, 5, 9, and 12. Consolidaton or transplant was at the discretion of the treating physician in phase A. In the second phase (B), induction was the same as that with the determined MTD of ixazomib. All patients were to be treated with the following consolidation: cytarabine at 2 g/m2/day, days 1-5 with ixazomib on days 2, 5, 9, and 12 at the cohort dose for consolidation. A standard 3 + 3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine whether the dose of ixazomib could be safely escalated in 3 cohorts (1.5 mg/day, 2.3 mg/day, 3.0 mg/day), initially in induction (phase A) and subsequently in consolidation (phase B). The determined MTD of ixazomib in the first portion (A) of the trial was used during induction in the second portion (B), which sought to determine the MTD for ixazomib during consolidation. Secondary objectives included rate of complete remission, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-six patients have been enrolled on study, and 28 have completed dose levels A-1 through A-3 and B1 through B-2. Full information on cohort B-3 has not yet been obtained, hence, this report covers the experience with the initial 28 patients, cohorts A-1 through B-2. There were 12 (43%) patients among the 28 with secondary AML, either with prior hematologic malignancy or therapy-related AML. Nineteen patients (68%) were male, and the median age was 68 years (range 61-80 years). There have been no grade 5 toxicities due to study drug. Three patients died early due to leukemia, 2 of which were replaced for assessment of the MTD. Nearly all the grade 3 and 4 toxicities were hematologic (Table). There was 1 DLT (grade 4 platelet count decrease extending beyond Day 42). There has been no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity with ixazomib to date. Among the 28 patients in the first 5 cohorts, 22 achieved complete remissions (CR) and 2 achieved CRi, for a composite remission rate (CCR) of 86%. Among the 12 patients with secondary AML 8 achieved CR and 2 achieved CRi, for a CCR of 83%. The median OS for the 28 patients has not been reached (graph). The 18-month OS estimate was 65% [90% CI, 50-85%]. Conclusions: The highest dose level (3 mg) of ixazomib planned for induction in this trial has been reached safely. For consolidation there have been no serious safety issues in the first 2 cohorts with a dose up to 2.3 mg, apart from 1 DLT in the form of delayed platelet count recovery. The recommended phase 2 dose of ixazomib for induction is 3 mg. Accrual to cohort B-3 is ongoing. Notably, to date, no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity has been encountered. The remission rate in this older adult population with the addition of ixazomib to standard chemotherapy appears favorable. Figure Disclosures Amrein: Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Attar:Aprea Therapeutics: Current Employment. Brunner:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hobbs:Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Fathi:Blueprint: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib is FDA approved for multiple myeloma. We are using it in this trial for acute myeloid leukemia.

scholarly journals EZH2 Mutations and Impact on Clinical Outcome Analyzed in 1604 Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1528-1528
Author(s):  
Sebastian Stasik ◽  
Jan Moritz Middeke ◽  
Michael Kramer ◽  
Christoph Rollig ◽  
Alwin Krämer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Purpose: The enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is a histone methyltransferase and key epigenetic regulator involved in transcriptional repression and embryonic development. Loss of EZH2 activity by inactivating mutations is associated with poor prognosis in myeloid malignancies such as MDS. More recently, EZH2 inactivation was shown to induce chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Göllner et al., 2017). Data on the frequency and prognostic role of EZH2-mutations in AML are rare and mostly confined to smaller cohorts. To investigate the prevalence and prognostic impact of this alteration in more detail, we analyzed a large cohort of AML patients (n = 1604) for EZH2 mutations. Patients and Methods: All patients analyzed had newly diagnosed AML, were registered in clinical protocols of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) (AML96, AML2003 or AML60+, SORAML) and had available material at diagnosis. Screening for EZH2 mutations and associated alterations was done using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) (TruSight Myeloid Sequencing Panel, Illumina) on an Illumina MiSeq-system using bone marrow or peripheral blood. Detection was conducted with a defined cut-off of 5% variant allele frequency (VAF). All samples below the predefined threshold were classified as EZH2 wild type (wt). Patient clinical characteristics and co-mutations were analyzed according to the mutational status. Furthermore, multivariate analysis was used to identify the impact of EZH2 mutations on outcome. Results: EZH2-mutations were found in 63 of 1604 (4%) patients, with a median VAF of 44% (range 6-97%; median coverage 3077x). Mutations were detected within several exons (2-6; 8-12; 14-20) with highest frequencies in exons 17 and 18 (29%). The majority of detected mutations (71% missense and 29% nonsense/frameshift) were single nucleotide variants (SNVs) (87%), followed by small indel mutations. Descriptive statistics of clinical parameters and associated co-mutations revealed significant differences between EZH2-mut and -wt patients. At diagnosis, patients with EZH2 mutations were significantly older (median age 59 yrs) than EZH2-wt patients (median 56 yrs; p=0.044). In addition, significantly fewer EZH2-mut patients (71%) were diagnosed with de novo AML compared to EZH2-wt patients (84%; p=0.036). Accordingly, EZH2-mut patients had a higher rate of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) (21%), evolving from prior MDS or after prior chemotherapy (tAML) (8%; p=0.036). Also, bone marrow (and blood) blast counts differed between the two groups (EZH2-mut patients had significantly lower BM and PB blast counts; p=0.013). In contrast, no differences were observed for WBC counts, karyotype, ECOG performance status and ELN-2017 risk category compared to EZH2-wt patients. Based on cytogenetics according to the 2017 ELN criteria, 35% of EZH2-mut patients were categorized with favorable risk, 28% had intermediate and 37% adverse risk. No association was seen with -7/7q-. In the group of EZH2-mut AML patients, significantly higher rates of co-mutations were detected in RUNX1 (25%), ASXL1 (22%) and NRAS (25%) compared to EZH2-wt patients (with 10%; 8% and 15%, respectively). Vice versa, concomitant mutations in NPM1 were (non-significantly) more common in EZH2-wt patients (33%) vs EZH2-mut patients (21%). For other frequently mutated genes in AML there was no major difference between EZH2-mut and -wt patients, e.g. FLT3ITD (13%), FLT3TKD (10%) and CEBPA (24%), as well as genes encoding epigenetic modifiers, namely, DNMT3A (21%), IDH1/2 (11/14%), and TET2 (21%). The correlation of EZH2 mutational status with clinical outcomes showed no effect of EZH2 mutations on the rate of complete remission (CR), relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (with a median OS of 18.4 and 17.1 months for EZH2-mut and -wt patients, respectively) in the univariate analyses. Likewise, the multivariate analysis with clinical variable such as age, cytogenetics and WBC using Cox proportional hazard regression, revealed that EZH2 mutations were not an independent risk factor for OS or RFS. Conclusion EZH mutations are recurrent alterations in patients with AML. The association with certain clinical factors and typical mutations such as RUNX1 and ASXL1 points to the fact that these mutations are associated with secondary AML. Our data do not indicate that EZH2 mutations represent an independent prognostic factor. Disclosures Middeke: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rollig:Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Scholl:Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbivie: Other: Travel support; Alexion: Other: Travel support; MDS: Other: Travel support; Novartis: Other: Travel support; Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Carreras Foundation: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Brümmendorf:Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Burchert:AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Krause:Novartis: Research Funding. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Platzbecker:Celgene: Research Funding. Mayer:Eisai: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding. Serve:Bayer: Research Funding. Ehninger:Cellex Gesellschaft fuer Zellgewinnung mbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Bayer: Research Funding; GEMoaB Monoclonals GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thiede:AgenDix: Other: Ownership; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Increased Idarubicin Dosage during Consolidation Therapy for Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Improves Leukemia-Free Survival

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 338-338
Author(s):  
Bradstock Kenneth ◽  
Emma Link ◽  
Juliana Di Iulio ◽  
Jeff Szer ◽  
Paula Marlton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Anthracylines are one of the major classes of drugs active against acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Increased doses of daunorubicin during induction therapy for AML have been shown to improve remission rates and survival. The ALLG used idarubicin in induction therapy at a dose of 9 mg/m2 x 3 days (total dose 27 mg/m2) in combination with high-dose cytarabine and etoposide (Blood 2005, 105:481), but showed that a total idarubicin dose of 36 mg/m2 was too toxic in this context (Leukemia 2001, 15:1331). In order to further improve outcomes in adult AML by anthracycline dose escalation, we conducted a phase 3 trial comparing standard to an increased idarubicin dose during consolidation therapy. Methods: Patients achieving complete remission after 1 or 2 cycles of intensive induction therapy (idarubicin 9 mg/m2 daily x3, cytarabine 3 g/m2 twice daily on days 1,3,5 and 7, and etoposide 75 mg/m2 daily x7; ICE protocol) were randomized to receive 2 cycles of consolidation therapy with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day for 5 days, etoposide 75 mg/m2 for 5 days, and idarubicin 9mg/m2 daily for either 2 or 3 days (standard and intensive arms respectively). No further protocol therapy was given. The primary endpoint was leukemia-free survival from randomization to consolidation therapy (LFS) with overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoint. Results: A total of 422 patients with AML (excluding cases with CBF rearrangements or APL) aged 16 to 60 years were enrolled between 2003-10, with 345 (82%) achieving complete remission, and 293 being randomized to standard (n=146) or intensive (n=147) consolidation arms. The median age was 45 years in both arms (range 16- 60), and both groups were balanced for intermediate versus unfavorable karyotypes and for frequency of mutations involving FLT3-ITD and NPM1 genes. Of the randomized patients, 120 in the standard arm (82%) and 95 in the intensive arm (65%) received the second consolidation cycle (p<0.001). The median total dose of idarubicin received in the 2 consolidation courses was 36 mg/m2 (range 17-45), or 99% (47-125%) of the protocol dose in the standard arm, versus 53 mg/m2 (18-73), or 98% (33-136%) of the protocol dose in the intensive arm. The durations of grades 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly longer in the intensive arm, but there were no differences in grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities. There were no non-relapse deaths during consolidation on the standard arm and 2 in the intensive (0% vs 1%; p =0.50). Subsequently, 41 patients in the standard arm and 37 in the intensive arm underwent elective allogeneic BMT during first remission. On intention to-treat analysis uncensored for transplant and with a median follow-up time of 5.3 years (range 0.6 - 9.9), there was improvement in LFS in the intensive arm compared with the standard arm (3 year LFS 47% (95% CI 40-56%) versus 35% (28-44%); HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.55-0.99); p=0.045) (Figure 1). The 3 year OS for the intensive arm was 61% (95% CI 54-70%) and 50% (95% CI 43-59%) for the standard arm; HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.54-1.05); p=0.092). Although adverse cytogenetics, presence of FLT3-ITD mutation, and absence of NPM1 mutation were all associated with poorer outcomes, there was no evidence of a benefit of intensive consolidation being confined to specific cytogenetic or gene mutation sub-groups. Conclusion: We conclude that in adult patients in complete remission after intensive induction chemotherapy an increased dose of idarubicin delivered during consolidation therapy results in improved LFS, without increased non-hematologic toxicity. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Szer: Ra Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marlton:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wei:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Cartwright:ROCHE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roberts:Servier: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Mills:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship. Gill:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Impact Of The Early Intensification Of Induction Chemotherapy On Complete Remission and Survival Rates For De Novo Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3402-3402
Author(s):  
Seung-Ah Yahng ◽  
Jae-Ho Yoon ◽  
Sung-Eun Lee ◽  
Seung-Hwan Shin ◽  
Byung-Sik Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background The successful induction chemotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) depends on the ability to achieve complete remission (CR) and to maintain remission status as long as possible. Approach to improve the rate of CR includes the intensification of induction chemotherapy for AML. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate and compare the long-term outcomes between remission induction therapy with and without early intensification added to the standard 3+7 remission induction regimen. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on de novo AML patients diagnosed and treated at Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center between January 2001 and December 2010. Six hundred forty-one adults of ages between 16 and 60 were included, all of whom received induction chemotherapy starting with 3 days of idarubicin and 7 days of cytarabine or behenoyl cytarabine (BHAC). Cases with t(9;22) and t(15;17) were excluded. Bone marrow (BM) aspiration study was assessed on day 7 of induction in all patients. Factors which were considered for early intensification of induction were the presence of ≥ 5% BM blasts, patient performance, and other high risk clinical characteristics, such as karyotype. Groups according to early intensification on days 8 to 10 of induction were as followings: no intensification (3+7), n=156; cytarabine or BHAC for 3 days (3+10), n=233; addition of idarubicin for 2 days to 3+10 regimen (5+10), n=252. After a median duration of 5.5 months (3.3-19.0) from diagnosis, 479 patients underwent stem cell transplantation (autologous [auto-SCT], n=144; allogeneic [allo-SCT], n=335). Conditioning regimen for auto-SCT consisted of fractionated total body irradiation (TBI), melphalan, and cytarabine, whereas 83% (n=278) of patients with allo-SCT received myeloablative conditioning, of which was mostly TBI-based regimen (92%). Donors were matched sibling (n=213), matched unrelated (n=63), mismatched unrelated (n=39), and haploidentical related (n=20). Results The median age at diagnosis was 39 years (16-60). Mean values of BM blast % on day 7 of induction was 3.5 in 3+7 group, 7.9 in 3+10, and 33.6 in 5+10 (p=<0.0001), while no significant difference in the proportion of adverse karyotype was shown (11.7% vs. 12.8%, p=0.804). After first induction (3+7, n=165; 3+10/5+10, n=465), the CR/CRi rate was significantly higher in 3+10/5+10 versus 3+7 (78.1% vs. 69.2%, p=0.023), while the rate for death in aplasia was lower (4.3% vs. 9.6%, p=0.013). After re-induction with various regimens, the CR/CRi rate was still significantly higher in intensified group (p=0.012). The relapse rates between the groups in 536 patients achieving CR (83.6%), however, was not significantly different (8.9% vs. 9.9%, p=0.737). SCT was performed at CR1 (n=459), CR2 (n=10), or relapsed/refractory status (n=10). Patients with auto-SCT mostly had better/intermediate cytogenetic risk (96%) at diagnosis, while 12% of allo-SCT had poor karyotype. After the median follow-up duration of 60.2 months (2.2-143.5), the median overall survival (OS) in all patients (n=641) was 65.6 months. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with auto- and allo-SCT was 58.4±4.2 and 64.9±2.7, respectively. Of 334 patients receiving allo-SCT, the 5-year DFS was significantly higher in patients achieving CR1 (n=299) after first induction therapy (p<0.0001), in whom 75% of them had early intensification. Other factors with significant impact on DFS after allo-SCT (n=334) were karyotype at diagnosis (p=0.032) and donor type (HLA-matched vs. HLA-mismatched sibling or unrelated, 58.1%±3.8 vs. 45.1±8.0, p=0.016). The significances were confirmed in multivariate analysis, which demonstrated that achieving CR1 after first induction regimen and its maintenance until SCT was the most powerful predictor for DFS after allo-SCT (67.1±2.9 vs. 34.6±7.8, p=<0.0001). When all patients were analyzed, according to induction intensification, a statistically significant benefit in 10-year OS was observed in 5+10 intensified group (44.8% vs. 52.9%, p=0.032). Conclusion Our results suggest possible benefit of examining day 7 BM aspiration for the strategy of early intensification of induction chemotherapy for adult AML patients and our intensification doses can be safely added with high efficacy in the achievement of CR1 compared to 3+7 standard regimen, and may have affected for better DFS after allo-SCT. Disclosures: Kim: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Outcomes By Best Response with Hypomethylating Agent Plus Venetoclax in Adults with Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2292-2292
Author(s):  
Virginia Olivia Volpe ◽  
Akriti G Jain ◽  
Onyee Chan ◽  
Eric Padron ◽  
David A. Sallman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Free State ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (HMA) (HMA+VEN) is a standard of care treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy. In the phase 3 VIALE-A trial, azacididine (aza)+VEN compared to aza alone demonstrated an improved overall survival of 14.7 months versus 9.6 months, respectively. A common toxicity with HMA+VEN is myelosuppression. The prognostic implications of incomplete count recovery despite leukemia free state after HMA+VEN treatment in AML is unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes of those who achieved complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), or morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) in AML patients treated frontline with HMA+VEN. Methods: Patients seen at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2019 and 2021 diagnosed with AML and treated with frontline HMA+VEN were retrospectively evaluated and included for analysis. Patients were stratified by best response; either CR, CRi, or MLFS. Baseline characteristics were compared by chi square (categorical variables) and t- test (continuous variables). Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from date of diagnosis and groups were compared using log-rank test. Results: Of the 102 patients treated with HMA+VEN in the frontline setting, 48% (n=49) had blast clearance with a best response of CR in 27/102 (26.4%), CRi in 16/102 (15.7%), or MLFS in 6/102 (5.9%). The remainder had residual disease. Baseline characteristics were similar among the three response groups (Table 1) as was mutational distribution (Table 2). There was no difference between AML WHO classification subtype (p= .148). Decitabine or aza was used at the discretion of the treating physician did not significantly impact responses (p= .225). In those who achieved CR, 14% had prior therapy related AML compared to 37.5% in CRi and 33.3% in MLFS (p= .314). Antecedent MDS or MPN with transformation to AML was seen in 22.2%, 18.8%, and 66.7% of CR, CRi, and MLFS respectively (p= .029). Of those, 3.7% in CR group had HMA use for prior MDS/MPN compared to 0% in CRi and 50% in MLFS (p= .000). The median relapse free survival was not reached for CR, CRi, and MLFS (Figure 1), it is important to note that 3 of the 6 MLFS patients died without relapse . At median follow up of 23 months, median overall survival (OS) in the CR group was significantly longer, 31 months, compared to 18 months in the CRi group and 8.5 months in the MLFS group (p=0.0415) (Figure 2). Transplant was achieved in 26% of CR and 6.3% of CRi and 0% of MLFS and was not significant among the groups (p = .124). Conclusion: Patients who received frontline HMA+VEN for AML directed therapy and achieved CR/CRi had better survival compared to those who achieved MLFS. Our data suggest that incomplete recovery of blood counts plays a significant role in overall survival regardless of leukemia free state. Further, the data demonstrate significantly higher secondary AML with antecedent MDS or MPN in the MLFS group compared to CR and CRi groups. Of those, prior HMA therapy was also identified as significantly higher in the MLFS group compared to CR and CRi groups which may contribute to the prolonged cytopenias and worse OS. While the limitation to this study is overall small number of patients, it suggests that a goal of CR over CRi or MLFS is desirable for superior OS. In the future, it would be of interest to incorporate the rates of responses and variables that may have an impact such as therapy dose adjustment, time to response, and delays in therapy due to cytopenia. Additional studies identifying dose adjustments or other ways to improve hematologic recovery would be valuable to potentially improve outcomes in this difficult to treat population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Padron: Stemline: Honoraria; Taiho: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Blueprint: Honoraria; Kura: Research Funding. Sallman: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Intellia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Consultancy; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Geron: Consultancy; BMSCelgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Taiho Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lancet: AbbVie: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Millenium Pharma/Takeda: Consultancy; ElevateBio Management: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy; BerGenBio: Consultancy. Sweet: AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Fc Receptor-Dependent Trogocytosis of CD39 Impacts Engraftment and Invasiveness of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3298-3298
Author(s):  
Lili Feng ◽  
Haohai Zhang ◽  
Paola de Andrade Mello ◽  
Dina Stroopinsky ◽  
Wenda Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bioluminescence Imaging ◽  
Lentiviral Vector ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Corresponding author: Dr. Simon. C. Robson ([email protected]). Introduction: CD39/ENTPD1 (ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1) is the prototypic member of the GDA1-CD39 superfamily of ectonucleotidases and modulates purinergic signaling pathways. CD39 expression has been noted in human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and likely contributes to chemoresistance [1]. Our study reported here elucidates the impact of Cd39 on engraftment and invasiveness of AML TIB-49 cells using an immunocompetent murine experimental model. Methods: Wild-type (WT) mice and Cd39 -/- mice on C57BL/6 background were bred at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. The syngeneic murine AML cell line TIB-49 (Cd39 negative in vitro) was purchased from American Type Culture Collection. For bioluminescence imaging experiments, TIB-49 cells were transduced with luciferase/mCherry using a lentiviral vector. For AML model, mice were administered with 1×10 6 TIB-49-luciferase cells intravenously via tail vein injection. For chloroma model, mice were subcutaneously inoculated with 1×10 6 TIB-49 cells in the right flank. Bioluminescence imaging of TIB-49-luciferase bearing mice was conducted with the IVIS TM 50 Imaging System. Blood, spleen and bone marrow (BM) were also collected from TIB-49 bearing AML mice for FACS (fluorescence activated cell sorting) analysis. To explore Cd39 in TIB engraftment and invasiveness, TIB-49 cells were further transduced with a lentiviral vector overexpressing mCd39 with TdTomato. WT mice were intravenously inoculated with 1×10 6 of either TIB-49-TdTomato cells or TIB-49-mCd39-TdTomato cells, and the above read-outs were determined. To investigate the potential of CD39 as a therapeutic target, we engineered anti-mouse Cd39 antibodies (αCd39 mAb) with isotype selection and removal of fucose to further promote Fc receptor (FcR) interactions. Results: Bioluminescence imaging results indicated that TIB-49 engraftment was decreased in global Cd39 -/- mice with decreased disease burdens noted relative to WT (Figure 1A). FACS analysis of blood, spleen and BM-derived cells from TIB-49 bearing AML-model mice (day 31) confirmed higher engraftment of TIB-49 cells (TdTomato+) at all sites in WT compared to Cd39 -/- mice (Figure 1B). TIB-49 cells did not express Cd39 in vitro, but TIB-49 cells harvested from spleen and BM of WT but not Cd39 -/- mice displayed high levels of Cd39. This indicated TIB-49 cells acquired Cd39 from host cells, in a process of antibody-independent trogocytosis (Figure 1C), as RT-PCR did not detect Cd39 mRNA expression in TIB-49 cells in vivo. Additionally, circulating TIB-49 cells from the blood of WT mice were Cd39 negative (Figure 1C), suggesting a role for the tumor microenvironment in mediating trogocytosis. TIB-49 cells expressing host Cd39 in WT mice spleen and BM lost Cd39 after being exposed to αCd39 mAb treatment. Cd39 translocated from TIB-49 cells to effector cells, at least in part, dependent on FcR mediated trogocytosis (Figure 1D). When Cd39 was overexpressed on TIB-49 cells (TIB-49-mCd39-TdTomato), the engraftment was boosted in WT mice in vivo when compared to TIB-49-TdTomato cells (day 19, Figure 1E) with higher levels of Cd39 expression than that observed on TIB-49-TdTomato cells in spleen and BM (day 26) (Figure 1F). Moreover, TIB-49-mCd39-TdTomato bearing mice displayed shorter survival times, when compared with TIB-49-TdTomato bearing AML mice (Figure 1G). The αCd39 mAb monotherapy had no effect on TIB-49 chloroma model growth. However, pretreatment with αCd39 mAb effectively boosted daunorubicin chemotherapeutic effects in vivo (Figure 1H and 1I). Conclusions: Our study suggests bidirectional trogocytosis between TIB-49 AML and host immune cells, which is further modulated by FcR interaction. Re-distribution of Cd39 from host to TIB-49 cells or induced high level expression contributes to engraftment and invasiveness, resulting in decreased survival. Targeting CD39 is a potential therapeutic approach, operational not only by boosting chemosensitivity but furthering anti-leukemic effects in experimental models. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. References: [1] Nesrine Aroua, Emeline Boet, Margherita Ghisi, et al. Extracellular ATP and CD39 Activate cAMP-Mediated Mitochondrial Stress Response to Promote Cytarabine Resistance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2020. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Stroopinsky: The Blackstone Group: Consultancy. Avigan: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Partner Tx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aviv MedTech Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Legend Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Parexcel: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document