scholarly journals Prognostic Value of IPSS-R Score, Cytogenetic Aberrations, and Cytopenias on Outcome of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Myelodysplastic Syndrome in GATA2 Deficiency

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3094-3094
Author(s):  
Julia Scheiermann ◽  
Robert West ◽  
Lisa J. Embree ◽  
Katherine R. Calvo ◽  
Nirali N. Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cytogenetic Aberrations ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Gata2 Deficiency

Abstract Sporadic or familial germline mutations in GATA2 frequently result in a bone marrow failure syndrome characterized by recurrent life-threatening infections, cytopenias, and progression to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents the only definitive therapy for GATA2 deficiency. However, the highly variable disease penetrance in different families, and in mutation positive individuals within a single family, make the timing of HSCT challenging. We assessed the utility of scoring patient characteristics according to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) to predict survival after HSCT in a cohort of 51 patients with GATA2 deficiency who had progressed to MDS. Higher IPSS-R scores significantly correlated with reduced overall survival after transplant. In evaluating the components of the IPSS-R score for patients with GATA2 deficiency, cytopenias, including anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, were important variables in placing these patients in higher risk IPSS-R categories. Since GATA2 deficiency patients have very low peripheral blood monocyte, B cell, and NK cell counts, we evaluated these cytopenias in conjunction with IPSS-R scoring. These cytopenias also had prognostic value for outcome after HSCT in patients with GATA2 deficiency. Cytogenetics, another component of the IPSS-R score, also placed patients with GATA2 deficiency into higher risk categories. In particular, patients harboring monosomy 7 had poorer survival outcomes than patients with normal cytogenetics or trisomy 8. Of note, all five patients with GATA2 deficiency and trisomy 1q successfully underwent HSCT. Clonal cytogenetic progression with the development of additional cytogenetic aberrations was a harbinger of myeloid progression and led to HSCT. In a cohort of four patients who underwent HSCT following progression to AML/CMML, there was only one survivor. Thus, HSCT is recommended in patients with GATA2 deficiency and intermediate or high-risk IPSS-R scores before the development of AML or CMML. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals 1153. Characterization of Invasive Mold Infections in Acute Leukemia and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipient Patients and Risk Factors for Mortality - a Single Center Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S603-S604
Author(s):  
Ryan Kubat ◽  
Praveen Subramanian ◽  
Yanming Li ◽  
Kassem Hammoud ◽  
Albert Eid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Invasive Mold Infections

Abstract Background Invasive mold infections (IMIs) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute leukemia (AL) and those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We describe the epidemiology of IMIs, the incidence of IMI in patients with acute myelogenous Leukemia (AML) post HSCT, and risk factors for mortality. Methods Patients were identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes using a University of Kansas internal database from 2009-2019, microbiology records, and an AML HSCT database and were followed through May 1st, 2020. Patients’ electronic medical records were reviewed for inclusion. IMI was defined as proven or probable using the 2009 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (MSG) guidelines. Incidence was calculated as IMI cases/100-person-years. Risk factors for overall mortality were evaluated using a Cox regression model. Results We included 138 patients: 79 developed IMI after HSCT (8 autologous, 71 allogeneic) and 59 developed IMI after AL diagnosis. Seventeen of the AL patients underwent HSCT after IMI diagnosis (12 within 100 days of IMI). Proven IMI occurred in 45 (32.6%) and probable IMI occurred in 93 (67.4%) patients. The most common prophylactic agent prior to IMI diagnosis was fluconazole (31.2%), with 21.0% receiving none. Aspergillus was the most commonly identified mold with 91 (65.9%) cases. The average treatment duration was 101 (range 0 - 799) days. The incidence of IMI in patients with AML who underwent HSCT was 2.35 cases/100 person-years. All-cause mortality among patients with AL or HSCT who developed IMI was 23.1% at 6 weeks, 34.1% at 12 weeks, and 61.2% at 1 year. On univariate Cox model, Karnofsky performance status > 70 was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.317, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.110, 0.914]) among HSCT recipients. ICU admission within 7 days prior to IMI diagnosis (HR 6.469, 95% CI [1.779, 23.530]) and each one point increase in BMI (HR 1.051, CI [1.001, 1.103]) were associated with increased mortality in the AL group. Figure 1 - Invasive mold infections by pathogen in HSCT-recipients and acute leukemia patients from 2009-2019. Figure 2 - Antifungal prophylactic agents prescribed for at least one week at time of IMI diagnosis Table 1 - Univariate survival analysis calculated using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model among patients who developed IMI after HSCT and patients who developed IMI after acute leukemia diagnosis Conclusion IMIs are associated with significant mortality in HSCT recipients and AL patients; patients at higher risk for mortality include those with lower baseline Karnofsky scores, recent ICU admissions, and higher BMI at time of IMI diagnosis. Disclosures Wissam El Atrouni, MD, ViiV (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Disparities in the Upfront Use of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3543-3543
Author(s):  
Tahir Mehmood ◽  
Adam C Bartley ◽  
Shahrukh K. Hashmi ◽  
Ronald S. Go
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
The Us ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Good Risk

Abstract Background: The incidence for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is on the rise in the United States (US). Roughly 20,000 new AML patients are expected to occur in 2016 in the US (data from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program). It is mainly a disease of older individuals with median age of 67 years. Unfortunately, most patients are not cured. Recent data suggest that early referral for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) leads to more favorable outcomes, particularly those with non-good risk cytogenetics compared to alternate therapies. The objective of our study was to assess the use of upfront HSCT among AML patients with a focus on patients with non-good risk cytogenetics and determine disparity in its access based on sociodemographic and regional considerations. Methods: We analyzed data obtained from National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Participant User Files for patients diagnosed with AML between 2004 and 2013 using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology version 3 (ICD-O-3) codes 9840-9861, 9865-9874, 9891-9931. The data is collected prospectively by joint program of Commission on Cancer (CoC) and American Cancer Society. It covers nationwide oncology outcome from more than 1,500 CoC-accredited hospitals. Over 70% of all newly diagnosed cancer cases in the US are captured by NCDB. Since unique ICD-O-3 codes exist for the good-risk but not for intermediate- or poor-risk AML, we categorized the AML subtypes as good risk or non-good risk for analytic purposes. We considered patients with t(15;17), inv(16) and t(8;21) with corresponding ICD-O codes of 9871, 9896, and 9866, as good-risk patients. All others were considered non-good risk. Proportion of HSCT usage was estimated in various subgroups with 95% confidence intervals calculated using robust estimates of standard error. Results: We identified 80,087 patients who were diagnosed with AML between 2004 and 2013. Majority of these patients were Whites (85.9%), males (53.8%) and between the ages of 40 and 79 years (71.5%). The overall use of upfront HSCT increased consistently over time. This occurred predominantly among the non-good risk AML from a rate of 6.5% in 2004 to 12.5% in 2013 (Figure). Non-good risk patients who were Black, had Medicare insurance, with lower annual household income, and treated at facilities located in the East, South and Central parts of US ( AL, KY, MS, TN) had less access to HSCT (Table). Conclusion: The use of upfront HSCT in AML has almost doubled in the past decade, predominantly among those with non-good risk cytogenetics. Nevertheless, we found substantial disparity among sociodemographic and geographic subgroups. Future studies should try to understand and address how to bridge this gap. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document