A Phase 1 Study of Flotetuzumab, a CD123 x CD3 DART® Protein, Combined with MGA012, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts and leukemic stem and progenitor cells typically express higher levels of CD123 than their normal hematopoietic stem cell counterparts, making CD123 an attractive target. Leukemic CD123 expression is associated with poor prognosis, high-risk disease, and increased risk of induction failure (Vergez et al 2011). Single-agent flotetuzumab, an investigational CD123 x CD3 bispecific DART protein, has shown evidence of clinical activity in a Phase 1 study of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this study, flotetuzumab led to T-cell activation which in turn was associated with PD-1 induction on T lymphocytes, enhanced IFNɣ secretion, and upregulation of PD-L1 expression by AML blasts (ASH 2018 Rutella, ASH 2018 Uy). In vitro studies have shown synergistic T-cell mediated cytotoxicity of an AML cell line (KG1A) with flotetuzumab in the presence of PD-1/PD-L1 axis blockade compared to flotetuzumab alone. MGA012, also known as INCMGA00012, is an investigational anti-PD-1 antibody that has shown clinical activity in a Phase 1 study (SITC 2018 Mehnert). We hypothesize that combined checkpoint inhibition with MGA012 together with redirected T‐cell killing of CD123+ cells with flotetuzumab may show enhanced activity over flotetuzumab alone. Methods This is a Phase 1 dose escalation study designed to characterize the safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (if no MTD is defined), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary anti-leukemic activity of flotetuzumab in combination with MGA012, each administered intravenously (IV) in patients with R/R AML. Response evaluation will be determined by modified ELN 2017 criteria. Activity is measured by complete response (CR) (complete remission [CR], or CR with partial hematologic recovery [CRh], or CR with incomplete hematological recovery [CRi], or morphologic leukemia-free state [MLFS]) rate, relapse-free survival, or mortality rate at 1 and 3 months. The impact of flotetuzumab/MGA012 combination on overall survival and event-free survival will be explored. Eligible patients will consist of adults with relapsed or refractory AML (any subtype except acute promyelocytic leukemia) who have exhausted standard of care options. In Induction Cycle 1, patients will be treated with a step-up lead in dose of flotetuzumab, followed by continuous infusion flotetuzumab, starting at week 2 of Cycle 1 and continuing through each 28-day cycle. MGA012 will be administered every two weeks. Depending on response, patients will transition to either consolidation or second induction. Eligible patients who achieve CR/CRh/CRi can receive maintenance MGA012 alone for up to 12 months. Disclosures Wei: AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: AHW is a former employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and receives a fraction of its royalty stream related to venetoclax, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Macrogenics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Fong:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy. Montesinos:Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gil:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Perez De Oteyza:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Rowe:BioSight: Consultancy. Wolach:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker. Sun:MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Baughman:MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. McNulty:MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bonvini:MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wigginton:Western Oncolytics: Other: clinical advisory board; MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Davidson-Moncada:MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

EZH2 Mutations and Impact on Clinical Outcome Analyzed in 1604 Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114421 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1528-1528

Author(s):

Sebastian Stasik ◽

Jan Moritz Middeke ◽

Michael Kramer ◽

Christoph Rollig ◽

Alwin Krämer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mutational Status ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Purpose: The enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is a histone methyltransferase and key epigenetic regulator involved in transcriptional repression and embryonic development. Loss of EZH2 activity by inactivating mutations is associated with poor prognosis in myeloid malignancies such as MDS. More recently, EZH2 inactivation was shown to induce chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Göllner et al., 2017). Data on the frequency and prognostic role of EZH2-mutations in AML are rare and mostly confined to smaller cohorts. To investigate the prevalence and prognostic impact of this alteration in more detail, we analyzed a large cohort of AML patients (n = 1604) for EZH2 mutations. Patients and Methods: All patients analyzed had newly diagnosed AML, were registered in clinical protocols of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) (AML96, AML2003 or AML60+, SORAML) and had available material at diagnosis. Screening for EZH2 mutations and associated alterations was done using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) (TruSight Myeloid Sequencing Panel, Illumina) on an Illumina MiSeq-system using bone marrow or peripheral blood. Detection was conducted with a defined cut-off of 5% variant allele frequency (VAF). All samples below the predefined threshold were classified as EZH2 wild type (wt). Patient clinical characteristics and co-mutations were analyzed according to the mutational status. Furthermore, multivariate analysis was used to identify the impact of EZH2 mutations on outcome. Results: EZH2-mutations were found in 63 of 1604 (4%) patients, with a median VAF of 44% (range 6-97%; median coverage 3077x). Mutations were detected within several exons (2-6; 8-12; 14-20) with highest frequencies in exons 17 and 18 (29%). The majority of detected mutations (71% missense and 29% nonsense/frameshift) were single nucleotide variants (SNVs) (87%), followed by small indel mutations. Descriptive statistics of clinical parameters and associated co-mutations revealed significant differences between EZH2-mut and -wt patients. At diagnosis, patients with EZH2 mutations were significantly older (median age 59 yrs) than EZH2-wt patients (median 56 yrs; p=0.044). In addition, significantly fewer EZH2-mut patients (71%) were diagnosed with de novo AML compared to EZH2-wt patients (84%; p=0.036). Accordingly, EZH2-mut patients had a higher rate of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) (21%), evolving from prior MDS or after prior chemotherapy (tAML) (8%; p=0.036). Also, bone marrow (and blood) blast counts differed between the two groups (EZH2-mut patients had significantly lower BM and PB blast counts; p=0.013). In contrast, no differences were observed for WBC counts, karyotype, ECOG performance status and ELN-2017 risk category compared to EZH2-wt patients. Based on cytogenetics according to the 2017 ELN criteria, 35% of EZH2-mut patients were categorized with favorable risk, 28% had intermediate and 37% adverse risk. No association was seen with -7/7q-. In the group of EZH2-mut AML patients, significantly higher rates of co-mutations were detected in RUNX1 (25%), ASXL1 (22%) and NRAS (25%) compared to EZH2-wt patients (with 10%; 8% and 15%, respectively). Vice versa, concomitant mutations in NPM1 were (non-significantly) more common in EZH2-wt patients (33%) vs EZH2-mut patients (21%). For other frequently mutated genes in AML there was no major difference between EZH2-mut and -wt patients, e.g. FLT3ITD (13%), FLT3TKD (10%) and CEBPA (24%), as well as genes encoding epigenetic modifiers, namely, DNMT3A (21%), IDH1/2 (11/14%), and TET2 (21%). The correlation of EZH2 mutational status with clinical outcomes showed no effect of EZH2 mutations on the rate of complete remission (CR), relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (with a median OS of 18.4 and 17.1 months for EZH2-mut and -wt patients, respectively) in the univariate analyses. Likewise, the multivariate analysis with clinical variable such as age, cytogenetics and WBC using Cox proportional hazard regression, revealed that EZH2 mutations were not an independent risk factor for OS or RFS. Conclusion EZH mutations are recurrent alterations in patients with AML. The association with certain clinical factors and typical mutations such as RUNX1 and ASXL1 points to the fact that these mutations are associated with secondary AML. Our data do not indicate that EZH2 mutations represent an independent prognostic factor. Disclosures Middeke: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rollig:Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Scholl:Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbivie: Other: Travel support; Alexion: Other: Travel support; MDS: Other: Travel support; Novartis: Other: Travel support; Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Carreras Foundation: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Brümmendorf:Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Burchert:AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Krause:Novartis: Research Funding. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Platzbecker:Celgene: Research Funding. Mayer:Eisai: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding. Serve:Bayer: Research Funding. Ehninger:Cellex Gesellschaft fuer Zellgewinnung mbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Bayer: Research Funding; GEMoaB Monoclonals GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thiede:AgenDix: Other: Ownership; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase II Study of the Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Bortezomib-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (PANORAMA 2)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.814.814 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 814-814 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Paul G. Richardson ◽

Melissa Alsina ◽

Donna M. Weber ◽

Steven E. Coutre ◽

Sagar Lonial ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Treatment Phase ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Overall Response ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Stage 1

Abstract Abstract 814FN2 Background: Patients with refractory multiple myeloma (MM) have limited treatment options and an extremely poor prognosis. A recent study of patients who were refractory to bortezomib and were relapsed following, refractory to or ineligible to receive an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD, thalidomide or lenalidomide) demonstrated a median event-free survival of only 5 months (Kumar S et al, Leukemia, 2011). Panobinostat is an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi) that increases acetylation of proteins involved in multiple oncogenic pathways. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-myeloma activity of the combination of panobinostat and bortezomib through dual inhibition of the aggresome and proteasome pathways. In a phase I study (B2207) of patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM treated with panobinostat + bortezomib, clinical responses (≥ minimal response [MR]) were observed in 65% of patients, including in patients with bortezomib-refractory disease. PANORAMA 2 seeks to expand upon these preliminary results and seeks to determine whether panobinostat can sensitize resistant patients to a bortezomib-containing therapeutic regimen. Methods: PANORAMA 2 is a single arm, phase II study of panobinostat + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. Patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory MM (≥ 2 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and who had progressed on or within 60 days of the last bortezomib-based therapy) are treated in 2 phases. Treatment phase 1 consists of 8 three-week cycles of oral panobinostat (20 mg days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12) + intravenous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) + oral dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). Patients demonstrating clinical benefit (≥ stable disease) can proceed to treatment phase 2, consisting of 4 six-week cycles of panobinostat (20 mg TIW 2 weeks on 1 week off, and repeat) + bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 22, 29) + dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). The primary endpoint is overall response (≥ partial response [PR]), as defined by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 1998 criteria, in the first 8 cycles of treatment phase 1. A Simon 2-stage design is used to test the primary endpoint where ≥ 4 responses (≥ PR) in 24 patients are needed in stage 1 in order to proceed to stage 2, where ≥ 9 responses in all patients (N = 47) are required to reject the null hypothesis (overall response rate ≤ 10%). Results: A sufficient number of responses ≥ PR were observed in stage 1 to allow for enrollment to continue to stage 2. As of 15 July 2011, 53 patients with bortezomib-refractory MM were enrolled. Safety and demographic data were available for 48 patients. The median age was 61 (41–88) years. Patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 4 (2–14) prior regimens, and most patients (69%) received prior autologous stem cell transplant. Efficacy data were available for 44 patients. At the time of this analysis, 9 patients achieved ≥ PR (2 near CR [nCR] and 7 PR) as best overall response, and an additional 7 patients achieved an MR. Responders exhibited a long duration on therapy, and, to date, 8 patients have proceeded to treatment phase 2. The 2 patients with nCR have received ≥ 10 cycles of treatment (duration of therapy 190 and 253 days). Four patients who achieved PR have received ≥ 9 cycles (duration of therapy 155–225 days). Updated response data will be presented. Common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included, fatigue (52%), diarrhea (41%), thrombocytopenia (38%), nausea (38%), and anemia (21%). Gastrointestinal AEs were generally mild, with a relatively low incidence of grade 3/4 events. Grade 3/4 AEs were generally hematologic in nature, with grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia reported in 38%, 12%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Other common nonhematologic grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (10%) and pneumonia (10%). Of note, to date, a relatively low rate of peripheral neuropathy (17%) has been observed. No grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy has been observed. Conclusions: The combination of panobinostat and bortezomib is a promising treatment for patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. These data, along with forthcoming data from the phase III study of panobinostat/placebo + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM (PANORAMA 1), will further define the potential role of panobinostat in the treatment of patients with MM. Disclosures: Richardson: Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alsina:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weber:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Gasparetto:Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Warsi:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ondovik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mukhopadhyay:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Snodgrass:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Subset Analysis of Response to Treatment of Chronic Phase CML in a Phase 1 Study of Ponatinib in Refractory Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.602.602 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 602-602 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Neil Shah ◽

Dale Bixby ◽

Michael J. Mauro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mutation Status ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 602 Background: Ponatinib is a potent, oral, pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor active against the native enzyme and all tested resistant mutants, including the uniformly resistant T315I mutation. Initial findings of a phase 1 trial in patients (pts) with refractory hematologic malignancies have been reported. The effect of duration of treatment, prior treatment, and mutation status on response to treatment was examined in CML chronic phase (CP) pts who responded to ponatinib. Methods: An open-label, dose escalation, phase 1 trial of ponatinib in pts with hematologic malignancies is ongoing. The primary aim is to assess the safety; anti-leukemic activity is also being investigated. Pts resistant to prior treatments or who had no standard treatment available were enrolled to receive a single daily oral dose of ponatinib (2 mg to 60 mg). Subset analyses of factors impacting cytogenetic and molecular response endpoints (MCyR and MMR) were performed for pts with CP-CML. Data are presented through April 15, 2011. Results: In total, 81 pts (54% male) received ponatinib. Overall, 43 pts had CP with 34 ongoing at analysis. MCyR was observed as best response in 31/43 (72%), 27 (63%) CCyR. The median time to MCyR was 12 (3 to 104) wks. Response rates were assessed by duration of treatment (1 pt in CCyR at entry was excluded; 6 pts in PCyR had to achieve CCyR). At the 3 month assessment, 22/42 (52%) CP pts achieved MCyR; at 6 months, 24/42 (57%); at 12 months, 29/42 (69%) had MCyR. The impact of prior treatment on response and time to response was assessed. 42 pts (98%) had >2 prior TKIs and 28 (65%) ≥3 prior TKIs, including investigational agents. Of approved TKIs, all pts were previously treated with imatinib, 19 dasatinib or nilotinib after imatinib, and 21 both dasatinib and nilotinib after imatinib. MCyR rate decreased with number of prior TKIs (2 prior TKIs 13/14 [93%], ≥3 prior TKIs 17/28 [61%]) and number of approved TKIs (imatinib followed by dasatinib or nilotinib 17/19 [90%], or by both dasatinib and nilotinib 12/21 [57%]). Time to response was prolonged in pts more heavily treated with prior TKIs. Median time to MCyR increased with the number of prior TKIs and approved TKIs (2 TKIs 12 wks, ≥3 TKIs 32 wks). The effect of mutation status on response and time to response was also evaluated. At entry, 12 pts had the T315I mutation, 15 had other BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations, 12 had no mutations detected, 4 did not allow sequencing. MCyR response rate for CP pts with T315I was 11/12 (92%); for other mutations, 10/15 (67%); and no mutation, 7/12 (58%). Similarly, mutation status had an impact on time to response: median time to MCyR was 12 wks for those with T315I or other mutations and 32 wks in resistant pts with no mutation. All CP patients were evaluable for MMR. At analysis, MMR was 17/43 (40%). MMR rate was inversely related to number of prior TKIs (2 TKIs 10/14 [71%], ≥3 TKIs 6/28 [21%]), approved TKIs (imatinib followed by dasatinib or nilotinib 12/19 [63%], or by both dasatinib and nilotinib 4/21 [19%]), and was higher for T315I pts (7/12, 58%) and those with other mutations (7/15, 47%) compared with no mutation (2/12, 17%). Median time to MMR for CP pts was 97 wks; median time to MMR was shorter for pts who were less heavily treated (2 prior TKIs 24 wks) and those with T315I or other mutations (63 wks). Conclusion: In this subset analysis of the phase 1 data, ponatinib had substantial activity in all subgroups analyzed. Time on treatment, less prior therapy and kinase domain mutations were associated with higher response rates and early responses in CP pts. Cytogenetic responses improved over the first 12 months of treatment and were higher in less heavily treated pts. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Shah:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bixby:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau. Mauro:ARIAD: Research Funding. Flinn:ARIAD: Research Funding. Hu:ARIAD: Employment. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Druker:MolecularMD: OHSU and Dr. Druker have a financial interest in MolecularMD. Technology used in this research has been licensed to MolecularMD. This potential conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by the OHSU Conflict of Interest in Research Committee and t. Deininger:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Talpaz:ARIAD: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1 Study Evaluating Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Safety of Carfilzomib in Patients with Advanced Malignancies and Varying Degrees of Hepatic Impairment (HI)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4496.4496 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4496-4496

Author(s):

Jennifer Brown ◽

Ruth Plummer ◽

Stephen Anthony ◽

John Sarantopoulos ◽

Filip De Vos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Hepatic Impairment ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Hepatic Function ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Advanced Malignancies ◽

Patient Groups ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: The PK profile of carfilzomib is well characterized in patients with multiple myeloma. However, during clinical development of carfilzomib, patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (HI) were excluded from initial clinical studies. To support carfilzomib dose recommendations for patients with baseline HI, this study evaluated PK and safety of carfilzomib in patients with varying degrees of HI and relapsed or progressive advanced malignancies. Methods: This open-label, single-arm, phase 1 study evaluated adult patients with normal (Norm) hepatic function or, mild, moderate (Mod), severe HI receiving carfilzomib infusion on days (D) 1-2, 8-9, 15 and 16 in 28-D cycles (C). Dose was escalated from 20 mg/m2 on C1 D1-D2 to 27 mg/m2 on D8 of C1 and if tolerated, further to 56 mg/m2 on D1 of C2. Norm hepatic function defined as bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels </=upper limit of normal (ULN). HI defined as mild: bilirubin >1-1.5 x ULN, or AST >ULN but with bilirubin </=ULN; Mod: bilirubin >1.5-3 x ULN with any AST; or severe: bilirubin >3 x ULN and any AST. The primary objective was to assess the effect of HI on area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last concentration measured (AUC0-last) and from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf) of carfilzomib. Secondary objectives included evaluation of carfilzomib maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax), clearance (CL), terminal half-life (T1/2), volume of distribution at steady state (Vss), mean residence time (MRT), and safety and tolerability, as well as PK parameters for carfilzomib's major metabolites. Plasma for analysis of PK parameters were collected on C1D16 for carfilzomib 27 mg/m2 and on C2D1 for the 56 mg/m2 dose. PK parameters were evaluated using a non-compartmental approach. The carfilzomib PK in HI patients was compared with Norm patients using summary statistics and analysis of variance. Due to enrollment challenges and lack of demonstrable efficacy with carfilzomib monotherapy, enrollment of severe HI patient (mostly advanced solid tumors) was discontinued. Results: 11 Norm, 17 Mild, 14 Mod, and 4 severe patients were enrolled; 61% male, mean age 62 years. Of these patients, 10 Norm, 14 Mild, 9 Mod, and 0 severe HI patients were PK evaluable. Following carfilzomib 27 and 56 mg/m2, considerable PK variability was seen within each of the treatment groups, with an overlapping exposure observed between groups (Table 1). Median Tmax ranged from 0.29 to 0.48 hour with peak concentrations of carfilzomib most often observed at 15 minutes after start or immediately before the end of infusion. Thereafter, concentrations of carfilzomib declined rapidly with a mean T1/2 of approximately 0.5 to 0.7 hour in all patient groups. A dose-dependent increase in mean AUC and Cmax of carfilzomib was observed between 27 mg/m2 and 56 mg/m2 in all 3 patient groups (Table 1); however, there was no consistent trend of increasing exposure (AUC0-last, AUC0-inf, and Cmax) with increasing severity of HI (Table 1 and 2). The mean AUC of the most abundant metabolite, PR-389/M14 was similar across all groups. A mean increase of approximately 60%-80% was observed for M15 and M16 AUC0-last, AUC0-inf and Cmax in patients with Mod HI vs Norm patients. These metabolites have no known biological activity. Median duration of exposure was 6 (Norm), 4.3 (Mild), 2.3 (Mod), and 0.8 (severe) wks. Thirty-five (76%) patients had grade >/=3 adverse events (AEs) including 15 patients with treatment-related grade >/=3 AEs. Grade >/=3 increased blood bilirubin (22%; Mod HI patients only), anemia (15%), fatigue (15%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (9%; Mod HI patients only) occurred in >3 patients. Conclusions: No marked differences in exposures (AUC and Cmax) were observed between Norm patients and mild/Mod HI patients following carfilzomib doses of 27 and 56 mg/m2.No consistent trend in carfilzomib exposure related to HI severity was seen. With the exception of the increased frequency of AEs consistent with hepatic function abnormalities, the observed AE profile in this study was consistent with the known safety profile of carfilzomib. HI did not appear to substantially increase severity of AEs; however, the number of patients was limited. Based on the results in this study, no carfilzomib dose adjustment appears to be warranted in patients with relapsed or progressive advanced malignancies and mild or Mod HI. Disclosures Anthony: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Paradigm Diagnostics: Consultancy. De Vos:European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dutch Working Group Neuro-Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; University Medical Center Utrecht: Employment. White:Amgen: Employment. Schupp:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ou:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1/2 Study of the Second Generation Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compound, KPT-8602, in Patients with Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4509.4509 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4509-4509 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

R. Frank Cornell ◽

Adriana C Rossi ◽

Rachid Baz ◽

Craig C Hofmeister ◽

Chaim Shustik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Nuclear Export ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction - Inhibition of Exportin 1 (XPO1) is a novel treatment approach for multiple myeloma (MM). XPO1 mediates the nuclear export of cell-cycle regulators and tumor suppressor proteins leading to their functional inactivation. In addition, XPO1 promotes the export and translation of the mRNA of key oncoproteins (e.g. c-MYC, BCL-2, Cyclin D). XPO1 overexpression occurs in solid and hematological malignancies, including MM and is essential for MM cell survival. Selinexor, the first oral SINE compound, has shown promising anti-MM activity in phase 1 studies but has been associated with gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities including nausea, anorexia and fatigue. KPT-8602 is a second generation oral SINE compound with similar in vitro potency to selinexor, however, has substantially reduced brain penetration compared with selinexor, and demonstrated markedly improved tolerability with minimal anorexia and weight loss in preclinical toxicology studies. In murine models of MM, KPT-8602 can be dosed daily (QDx5) with minimal anorexia and weight loss. We have therefore initiated a phase 1/2 first-in-human clinical trial. Methods - This phase 1/2 clinical trial was designed to evaluate KPT-8602 as a single agent and in combination with low dose dexamethasone (dex) in patients (pts) with relapsed / refractory MM (RRMM). KPT-8602 is dosed orally (QDx5) for a 28-day cycle with a starting dose of 5 mg. Low dose dex (20 mg, twice weekly) is allowed after cycle 1 if at least a minimal response (MR) is not observed. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability including dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), and evidence for anti-MM activity for KPT-8602 single agent and in combination with dex. The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PDn; XPO1 mRNA) profile of KPT-8602 will also be determined. PDn predictive biomarker analysis and ex vivo drug response assays are underway using tumor cells from bone marrow aspirates before treatment, during and at relapse. These analyses include cell death pathway assays by flow and nuclear/cytoplasmic localization of XPO1, NF-ƙB, IƙBα, IKKα, NRIF and p53 by imaging flow and IHC. Results - As of 01-Aug-2016, 6 pts 2 M/4 F, (median of 6 prior treatment regimens, median age of 71) with RRMM have been enrolled. Common related grade 1/2 adverse events (AEs) include thrombocytopenia (3 pts), nausea (2 pts) and diarrhea (2 pts). Grade 3 AEs include neutropenia (1 pt) and dehydration (1 pt). No grade 4 or 5 AEs have been reported. No DLTs have been observed and the MTD has not been reached. 5 pts were evaluable for responses (1 pt pending evaluation): 1 partial response, 1 minimal response, and 3 stable disease; no pts have progressed on therapy with the longest on for >5 months. The PK properties following oral administration showed that 5 mg of KPT-8602 was rapidly absorbed (mean tmax= 1 hr, mean Cmax= 30.6 ng/mL). The mean AUCinf was calculated to be 141 ng•hr/mL. After tmax, KPT-8602 declined at an estimated mean t½ of 4 hr. At the same dose level, XPO1 mRNA expression was the highest (~2.5 fold) at 8 hr post dose. Conclusions - Oral KPT-8602 is well tolerated in heavily pretreated pts with RRMM. Gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities observed with twice weekly selinexor have not been observed with 5x/week KPT-8602, including in pts on study for >4 months. PK was predictable and in line with selinexor. These early results show encouraging disease control with pts remaining on therapy. Enrollment is on-going. Disclosures Rossi: Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Baz:Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Signal Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hofmeister:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Arno Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Signal Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Incyte, Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company: Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shustik:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richter:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jannsen: Speakers Bureau. Chen:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vogl:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; GSK: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Baloglu:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Senapedis:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ellis:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Friedlander:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Choe-Juliak:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Sullivan:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Results from Ongoing Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial of Tagraxofusp (SL-401) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119302 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1821-1821 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Mrinal M. Patnaik ◽

Haris Ali ◽

Vikas Gupta ◽

Gary J. Schiller ◽

Sangmin Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell ◽

Optimal Dose ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Stage 1 ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract Background: Patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) have historically had poor outcomes, with overall response rates (ORR) of ~16% for hypomethylating agents (HMA) in first-line registration studies with a median overall survival (OS) of ~4-7 months in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. Allogeneic stem cell transplant is not an option for the majority, due to older age at diagnosis and comorbidities. Tagraxofusp (Elzonris™, SL-401) is a novel targeted therapy directed to the interleukin-3 receptor-α (CD123), a target expressed on a variety of malignancies. In CMML, CD123 is expressed on malignant progenitor cells as well as microenvironmental plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDC) infiltrates, now shown to be part of the malignant clone (Solary, EHA 2018). We thus hypothesized that therapeutic targeting of CD123-expressing malignant cells and infiltrating clonal pDCs may offer a novel therapeutic approach. Tagraxofusp has already demonstrated high levels of clinical activity against blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN), a CD123+ malignancy derived from pDCs. Methods: This multicenter, two-stage Phase 1/2 trial is enrolling patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) CMML or other myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Primary objectives include assessment of safety, determining optimal dose/regimen, and evaluating efficacy outcomes in patients with r/r CMML. In the Stage 1 dose escalation cohort (completed), tagraxofusp was administered as a daily IV infusion at 7, 9, and 12 mcg/kg/day, on days 1-3 every 21 days (cycle 1-4), every 28 days (cycles 5-7), and every 42 days (cycles 8+). In Stage 2 (ongoing), patients received the optimal dose determined in Stage 1 (12 mcg/kg; no MTD reached). Results: As of July 2018, 18 patients with CMML (CMML-1 [n=10]; CMML-2 [n=8]) received tagraxofusp. 13 patients were treated in second-line setting and 5 patients were treated in third-line and beyond, with HMAs being the most commonly administered prior therapy. Median age was 70 years (range 42-80); 78% patients were male. 53% (9/17) of patients had baseline splenomegaly (range: 2 to 22 cm palpable below left costal margin (BCM) by physical exam). Most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hypoalbuminemia and nausea (each 38%), vomiting (31%), fatigue, edema, and thrombocytopenia (each 25%). Most common ≥grade 3 TRAEs were thrombocytopenia (13%) and nausea (6%). Capillary leak syndrome was reported in 3 patients (19%; all grade 2). 100% (8/8) of patients with baseline splenomegaly had a spleen response, including 75% (6/8) who had reduction in splenomegaly of 50% or more. 60% (3/5) of patients with baseline spleen size ≥5cm had reduction in splenomegaly of 50% or more. Two patients treated with tagraxofusp achieved bone marrow CRs. 43% (6/14) of evaluable patients had a treatment duration of 6 months or more, including one at 8+ and one at 14+ months. Conclusions: Tagraxofusp monotherapy resulted in significant reductions in spleen sizes along with bone marrow morphological responses in relapsed/refractory patients with CMML, with a manageable safety profile. Given CD123 expression on both neoplastic myeloid cells and pDCs infiltrates, tagraxofusp may offer a novel targeted approach for patients with CMML, an area of unmet medical need. Enrollment continues, and updated safety and efficacy data will be presented. A registrational trial in this patient population is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02268253. Disclosures Ali: Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gupta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Schiller:Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Lee:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Clinipace: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. Yacoub:Cara Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Ardelyx, INC.: Equity Ownership; Dynavax: Equity Ownership; Inycte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Sardone:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wysowskyj:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shemesh:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Olguin:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brooks:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dunn:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Verstovsek:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Khoury:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding. Pemmaraju:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; novartis: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Results from Ongoing Phase 1/2 Trial of SL-401 in Combination with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.5696.5696 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 5696-5696 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Myo Htut ◽

Cristina Gasparetto ◽

Jeffrey Zonder ◽

Thomas G. Martin ◽

Emma C. Scott ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Free Light Chain ◽

M Protein ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Stage 1

Abstract Background: The bone marrow microenvironment of many multiple myeloma (MM) patients harbors high quantities of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), which are specialized immune cells that express the interleukin-3 receptor (CD123). These pDCs have been shown to augment MM growth and contribute to drug resistance, suggesting that targeting pDCs may offer clinical benefit for MM patients. SL-401, a novel targeted therapy directed to CD123, has previously demonstrated potent preclinical in vitro and in vivo activity against MM cell lines and primary tumor samples via both a direct anti-MM effect and an indirect effect by targeting neighboring pDCs. SL-401 has also demonstrated synergy in these systems when used in combination with traditional MM therapies including pomalidomide (POM). Clinically, SL-401 has demonstrated high levels of anti-tumor activity in patients with an aggressive CD123+ malignancy of pDC origin, namely blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN). SL-401 is currently being evaluated in combination with POM and dexamethasone (DEX) in relapsed or refractory (r/r) MM patients. Preliminary results are reported here. Methods and Results: This multicenter, single arm Phase 1/2 trial of patients with r/r MM includes a lead-in (stage 1) and expansion (stage 2). In stage 1, patients receive SL-401 as a daily IV infusion at 7, 9, or 12 ug/kg/day for days 1-5 of a 28 day cycle as a single agent for the initial run-in cycle (cycle 0) and in combination with standard doses/administration of POM+DEX in cycles 1 and beyond, in a 3x3 design. In stage 2, patients receive SL-401 in combination with POM+DEX at the dose and regimen determined in stage 1. Objectives include characterization of the safety profile of SL-401 in combination with POM+DEX, including determination of the maximum tolerated or tested dose, and detection of efficacy signals including evaluation of tumor response based on International Myeloma Working Group criteria, duration of response, progression-free survival, and translational evaluation of changes in BM microenvironmental pDCs. As of 7-25-16, 2 patients with r/r MM received SL-401 at 7 ug/kg in combination with POM+DEX. The median age was 65 years (range: 63-67 years). The most common treatment-related AEs, all grades, were thrombocytopenia (2/2, both grade 1) and hypoalbuminemia (2/2, both grade 2); there has been no DLT. Rapid onset decrease in a set of myeloma-related laboratory values from pre-SL-401 treatment was observed in both patients after the first combination cycle of SL-401 and POM+DEX. In one patient, serum M-protein decreased from 2.34 to 1.19 g/dL (cycle 1), free light chain kappa decreased from 40.1 to 8.27 mg/dL (cycle 1), and free light chain kappa/lambda ratio decreased from 58.12 to 41.35 (cycle 1). In the other patient, serum M-protein decreased from 1.88 to 0.87 (cycle 1) and then was 0.96 (cycle 3) g/dL, free light chain kappa decreased from 134 to 49.4 (cycle 1) and then was 92.5 (cycle 3) mg/dL, and free light chain kappa/lambda ratio decreased from 638.1 to 76 (cycle 1) and then was 111.45 (cycle 3). Both patients remain on study receiving ongoing SL-401 at 2+ and 4+ months. Dose escalation to 9 ug/kg is planned if a third patient clears the 7 ug/kg cohort. Conclusions:This is the first clinical study to evaluate SL-401 in combination with other agents. SL-401 thus far has been well-tolerated in combination with POM+DEX in r/r MM patients, with no unexpected AEs observed. After the first cycle of SL-401 and POM+DEX combination therapy, 2 of 2 patients experienced a rapid decrease in serum M-protein and remain on SL-401 therapy. Given CD123 expression on microenvironmental immune pDCs and the potential synergy of SL-401 with certain current MM agents including POM, SL-401 may offer a novel therapeutic approach in MM. This Phase 1/2 trial continues to enroll and updated data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02661022. Disclosures Zonder: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Prothena: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Other: DSMC membership. Martin:Sanofi: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Chen:Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shemesh:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brooks:Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Chauhan:Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy. Anderson:Oncopep: Other: Scientific Founder; Acetylon: Other: Scientific Founder; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sonofi Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

IPH4102; An Anti-KIR3DL2 Monoclonal Antibody in Refractory Sezary Syndrome: Results from a Multicenter Phase 1 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-118021 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 684-684 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Martine Bagot ◽

Pierluigi Porcu ◽

Basem M. William ◽

Maxime Battistella ◽

Maarten Vermeer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Monoclonal Antibody ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Multicenter Phase ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Aims: Sezary Syndrome (SS) is the most aggressive form of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL), characterized with high blood involvement and expression of Killer cell immunoglobulin like receptor 3DL2 (KIR3DL2). IPH4102 is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody that targets KIR3DL2. Very limited effective treatment options are available for SS patients with refractory disease. We conducted a phase 1 study testing IPH4102 in patients with refractory CTCL. Here we report results from the SS subset. Methods: IPH4102-101 study is a multicenter phase I trial composed of a dose escalation and cohort expansion portions that evaluated IPH4102 in patients with refractory CTCL. Key eligibility criteria included failure of ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. KIR3DL2 testing was performed for all patients at baseline and at different time points throughout the study. IPH4102 was given Q1w x 4 weeks, followed by Q2w x 10 weeks then Q4w until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint is safety. Main 2ry endpoints include best global response (BGR) using the Olsen criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), quality of life (QOL) and biomarker analyses. Results: The study included 35 SS patients, 20 in the dose escalation and 15 in the cohort expansion, with a median age of 70 years (37-90). Median time from initial SS diagnosis to starting IPH4012 was 22.8 months. Nineteen patients (54%) received IPH4102 as ≥ 4th line of systemic therapy and 7 (20%) were previously treated with mogamulizumab. Thirteen patients (37%) had lymph node involvement as per investigator assessment and based on radiological examination while 7 patients (20%) had evidence of large cell transformation. KIR3DL2 expression was observed in either skin or blood in 33 patients (94%) and in both in 28 patients (80%). Most common adverse events (AEs) were asthenia (26%), peripheral edema (26%), and fatigue (23%), which were all grade 1-2. Possibly related grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed in 7 patients (20%), and only 2 patients (6%) stopped treatment for an AE. Table 1 shows BGR and response by compartment. Overall response rate was 42.9% [95% CI: 28.0% - 59.1%], with median time to response of 4.8 months. Median DOR and PFS were 5.6 months [95% CI: 3.2-not reached] and 12.8 months [95% CI: 8.1-not reached], respectively. Mogamulizumab pretreated patients showed BGR, median DOR and PFS of 42.9%, 13.8 and 20.9 months, respectively. Quality of life assessment was performed using the Pruritus VAS score andSkinDex29. Patients with CR, PR or SD showed marked improvement overtime of all evaluated parameters including SkinDex29 global, symptoms, emotional, and functional scores. Biomarker analysis showed progressive decrease in CD4/CD8 ratio in responding patients. The decrease of KIR3DL2+ expressing cells in skin evaluated by immunohistochemistry at week 5 and 14 was able to predict BGR (AUC=0.749, 0.714, respectively). Figure 1 shows reduction in KIR3DL2 expressing cells at week 5 and week 14 in a patient who had PR as BGR. To date, 9 patients are still ongoing treatment. Updated clinical and correlative research analyses will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: IPH4102 is highly effective in patients with refractory SS. It induces meaningful clinical activity and improves quality of life placing it as an encouraging treatment option for these patients. Further development in SS and other T-cell malignancies is underway. Disclosures Bagot: Actelion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Porcu:Innate Pharma: Consultancy. Khodadoust:Innate Pharma: Research Funding. Sicard:Innate Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Azim:Innate Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kim:miRagen: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin-Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Nascent Transcript and Single Cell Rnaseq Analysis Defines the Mechanism of Action of the LSD1 Inhibitor INCB059872 in Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130458 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2509-2509

Author(s):

Gretchen Johnston ◽

Haley E. Ramsey ◽

Kristy Stengel ◽

Shilpa Sampathi ◽

Pankaj Acharya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Drug Treatment ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Myeloid Differentiation ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Upregulated Genes

Drugs targeting chromatin-modifying enzymes have entered clinical trials for myeloid malignancies, including INCB059872, a selective irreversible inhibitor of Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1). LSD1 is a component of the CoREST complex, in which it associates with histone deacetylases 1 and 2, the transcriptional co-repressor, mSin3A or mSin3B, and the REST corepressor (RCOR1), so a role in gene expression was expected. While initial studies of LSD1 inhibitors have suggested these compounds may be used to induce differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia, the mechanisms underlying this effect and dose-limiting toxicities are not well understood. Here, we have used precision nuclear run-on sequencing (PROseq) and single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) to show that INCB059872 de-represses GFI1/GFI1B-regulated genes to promote a myeloid differentiation gene signature in AML cells while stalling maturation of megakaryocyte progenitor cells. Within 3 days of treatment with INCB059872, the majority of THP-1, which contain an the MLL-translocation, undergo myeloid differentiation. RNAseq analysis indicated that 24h drug treatment upregulated genes involved in hematopoietic cell lineage, which is consistent with the differentiation. In addition, PROseq was used to measure the effects of INCB059872 on nascent transcription at genes and enhancers, as this is one of the best methods to define enhancer activity. In THP-1 cells after 24h treatment, there were 203 genes with at least a 1.5-fold increase in transcription, while there are nearly 1300 enhancers meeting this threshold. Upregulated genes include those associated with myeloid cell differentiation, such as CSF1R and CD86. Given that LSD1 catalyzes the removal of mono- and di-methyl marks from histone H3, we expected that INCB059872 would cause a buildup of histone methylation. Surprisingly, ChIPseq for H3K4me2 and H3K4me1 showed only subtle changes in these marks after 48h drug treatment in THP-1. Only a handful of LSD1i-induced enhancers overlapped with detectable changes in H3K4 methylation. However, our PROseq data is consistent with the increases in H3K27 acetylation seen with OG86 (a compound that disrupts the LSD1:GFI1 interaction) at GFI1 binding sites (PMID: 29590629). Indeed, motif analysis of INCB059872-upregulated enhancers identified the GFI1 recognition sequence as the most highly enriched. Moreover, siRNA inhibition of key components of LSD1-containing chromatin remodeling complexes pinpointed the CoREST complex as mediating the THP-1 myeloid differentiation effects of INCB059872. To investigate on-target thrombocytopenia seen with LSD1 inhibitors in preclinical studies, we analyzed the bone marrow of wild-type mice treated daily with INCB059872 for 0, 4, or 6 days before harvesting and sorting lin-bone marrow cells for scRNA-seq. Notably, one of the most highly upregulated genes in treated cells was Gfi1b. Unsupervised clustering identified 22 clusters, corresponding to unique subpopulations (Fig. 1A). While the distribution of cells into different progenitor populations was mostly unaffected by drug treatment, these data revealed a striking increase in the proportion of cells from treated mice assigned to a megakaryocyte stem/progenitor cluster. Cells within this expanded cluster expressed stem cell markers such as MYCN and PBX1, but also expressed VWF (Fig. 1B). Thus, LSD1 inhibition caused accumulation of megakaryopoiesis-biased stem cells that failed to mature into efficient platelet producers. Finally, we used scRNAseq to analyze bone marrow from an AML patient who responded to treatment with INCB059872 plus azacytidine (AZA). A pre-treatment bone marrow sample was divided into separate cultures to study the effects of INCB059872, AZA, or the combination. Remarkably, unsupervised clustering of patient cells assigned the majority of INCB059872 and combination-treated cells to clusters that were not found in control- or AZA-treated samples. Cells exposed to INCB059872 had upregulated GFI1 and GFI1B, as well as differentiation-related genes that were also observed in AML cell lines. Overall, these data indicate that INCB059872 affects gene expression with kinetics consistent with a loss of CoREST activity to stimulate differentiation of AML blasts, but the inactivation of GFI1/GFI1B impairs megakaryocyte maturation likely explaining thrombocytopenia seen in preclinical models. Disclosures Stubbs: Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Burn:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hiebert:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Savona:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Selvita: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Patents & Royalties; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Comparative Efficacy Among 3rd Line Post-Imatinib Chronic Phase-Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) Patients after Failure of Dasatinib or Nilotinib Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4551.4551 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4551-4551 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽

Dhvani Shah ◽

Vanita Tongbram ◽

Manpreet K Sidhu ◽

Hui Huang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Comparative Efficacy ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract INTRODUCTION Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) failing 1st line imatinib are most commonly treated with the second-generation (2G) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) dasatinib and nilotinib. However, for patients who experience resistance or intolerance (R/I) to 2G-TKIs in 2nd line, there currently is no consensus on the optimal therapy sequence for 3rd line treatment. The comparative efficacy of using ponatinib in the 3rd line after 2G TKI failure was examined in a previous study (Lipton et al., ASH 2013). This study assesses the comparative efficacy of ponatinib versus sequential treatment of alternate 2G TKIs in 3rdline setting in two separate patient populations, post-imatinib and dasatinib patients and post-imatinib and nilotinib patients. METHODS A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Libraries (2002-2014), as well as 3 conferences (ASH (2008-2014), ASCO (2008-2014), and EHA (2008-2013)). Studies evaluating any TKI were included if they enrolled 10 or more post-imatinib adult patients with CP-CML who were also R/I to dasatinib or nilotinib. All study designs were considered and no restriction was applied with respect to therapy dose, due to incomplete reporting of doses in the available studies. Analyses was run on two groups of patients, those failing imatinib and dasatinib (Group Ima/Das) and those failing imatinib and nilotinib (Group Ima/Nil). Bayesian methods were used to synthesize major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) from individual studies and estimate the overall response probability with 95% credible interval (CrI) for each treatment. Bayesian analysis also was used to estimate the likelihood that each treatment offers the highest probability of CCyR/MCyR based on available evidence. RESULTS Six studies evaluating bosutinib, nilotinib and ponatinib for Group Ima/Das (n= 419) and five studies evaluating bosutinib, dasatinib and ponatinib for Group Ima/Nil (n=83) were included in the analysis. All studies reported CCyR in both groups. Five studies evaluating bosutinib, nilotinib and ponatinib reported MCyR in Group Ima/Das and three studies evaluating bosutinib and ponatinib reported MCyR in Group Ima/Nil. Synthesized treatment-specific probabilities and 95% CrI for CCyR are presented in Figure 1. Synthesized treatment-specific probabilities of CCyR for Group Ima/Das were 27% for nilotinib, 20% for bosutinib and 54% (95% CrI 43%% to 66%) for ponatinib. Treatment-specific probabilities of MCyR for Group Ima/Das were 41% for nilotinib, 28% for bosutinib and 66% (95% CrI 55%% to 77%) for ponatinib. The probability of ponatinib providing superior response to all other included treatments for group Ima/Das was estimated to be >99% for both CCyR and MCyR. Synthesized treatment-specific probabilities of CCyR for Group Ima/Nil were 25% for dasatinib, 26% for bosutinib and 67% (95% CrI 51%% to 81%) for ponatinib. Treatment-specific probabilities of MCyR for Group Ima/Nil were 33% for bosutinib and 75% (95% CrI 60%% to 87%) for ponatinib. The probability of ponatinib providing superior response to all other included treatments for group Ima/Nil was estimated to be >99% for both CCyR and MCyR. CONCLUSIONS The post imatinib and dasatinib group included more studies with larger sample sizes compared with the post imatinib and nilotinib group. Overall, response rates appear higher for TKIs in the post imatinib and nilotinib group compared with the post imatinib and dasatinib group. For both groups, patients on ponatinib had higher CCyR and MCyR rates compared with the sequential 2G TKIs included in this analysis. Based on available data, ponatinib appears to provide a higher probability of treatment response for patients failing imatinib and dasatinib/ nilotinib compared with sequential 2G TKI therapy commonly used in this indication. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lipton: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Shah:Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Tongbram:Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Sidhu:Ariad Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Research Funding. Huang:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. McGarry:ARIAD Pharmaceutical, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hawkins:Ariad Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Research Funding.

Download Full-text