Plasma concentration guided dosing of drugs used for the treatment of childhood leukaemias: protocol for a systematic review

IntroductionChildhood leukaemia is the most common type of cancer in children and represents among 25% of the diagnoses in children <15 years old. Childhood survival rates have significantly improved within the last 40 years due to a rapid advancement in therapeutic interventions. However, in high-risk groups, survival rates remain poor. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data of cancer medications in children are limited and thus current dosing regimens are based on studies with small sample sizes. In adults, large variability in PK is observed and dose individualisation (plasma concentration guided dosing) has been associated with improved clinical outcomes; whether this is true for children is still unknown. This provides an opportunity to explore this strategy in children to potentially reduce toxicities and ensure optimal dosing. This paper will provide a protocol to systematically review studies that have used dose individualisation of drugs used in the treatment of childhood leukaemias.Methods and analysisSystematic review methodology will be applied to identify, select and extract data from published plasma guided dosing studies conducted in a paediatric leukaemia cohort. Databases (eg, Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Cochrane) and clinical trial registries (CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and ISRCTN) will be used to perform the systematic literature search (up until February 2021). Only full empirical studies will be included, with primary clinical outcomes (progression-free survival, toxicities, minimal residual disease status, complete cytogenetic response, partial cytogenetic response and major molecular response) being used to decide whether the study will be included. The quality of included studies will be undertaken, with a subgroup analysis where appropriate.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review will not require ethics approval as there will not be collection of primary data. Findings of this review will be made available through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. Gaps will be identified in current literature to inform future-related research.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021225045.

A Retrospective Cohort Study of Upfront Nilotinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center Experience

Context Nilotinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Aims We aim to evaluate the responses and safety of upfront Nilotinib therapy in Indian CML patients. Setting and Design We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of CML patients who received Nilotinib as an upfront treatment at our center between January 1, 2011 and October 15, 2019.The follow-up was taken till March 31, 2020. Results Forty One patients (n = 36 chronic phase and five accelerated-phase CML) received frontline Nilotinib. Median age was 39 years (21–63) with male-to-female ratio of 1.1: 1. At 3 months, 96.9% patients achieved BCR-ABL of ≤10% at international scale. By the end of 12 months, 71.5% patients achieved major molecular response (BCR-ABL ≤0.1%) and 91.4% patients achieved complete cytogenetic response assessed by BCR-ABL polymerase chain reaction of ≤1%. Common toxicities observed were weight gain, thrombocytopenia, corrected QT prolongation, and elevated serum amylase in 14 (34.1%), 7(17.07%), 4(9.7%), and 4(9.7%) patients, respectively. Overall, five patients had loss of response with further progression and death in three patients. At a median of 43.7 months, 38 patients survived with estimated 3 year event-free survival and overall survival of 65 ± 9 and 93 ± 5%. Conclusion This study showed remarkable good response with upfront Nilotinib in Indian patients with CML.

Correlations between Mutations in Cancer-Related Genes, Therapy Responses and Outcomes of the 3 rd Generation Tyrosine Kinase-Inhibitor (TKI) in Persons with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Failing Prior TKI-Therapy

Background Most, but not everyone with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) responds to imatinib or 2 nd-generation tyrosine kinase-inhibitors (TKIs). Mutations in cancer-related genes and in other than ABL1 may explain variable responses and outcomes to the 3 rd-generation TKIs including ponatinib and olverembatinib. Aim Interrogate correlations between mutations in cancer-related genes and therapy responses and outcomes to 3 rd-generation TKIs. Methods We used deep targeted sequencing for cancer-related mutations and Sanger sequencing for BCR::ABL1 on DNA samples from 167 subjects with CML failing to the prior imatinib and/or 2 nd-generation TKI-therapy and just before receiving a 3 rd-generation TKI. Gene ontology (GO) analysis was used to evaluate functional enrichment in GO terms among mutated genes. Optimal cut-offs for variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of the common mutations were determined by analyzing receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves. A Cox multi-variable regression model was used to identify correlations between mutations in cancer-related genes and therapy responses and outcomes of 3 rd-generation TKI-therapy. Results 167 subjects in chronic phase (n = 125) and accelerated phase (n = 42) received ponatinib (n = 28) or olverembatinib (n = 139) therapy. 27 subjects were exposed to imatinib; 79, a 2 nd-generation TKI; 61, imatinib and a 2 nd generation TKI. 142 (85%) subjects had ABL1 mutations including ABL1T315I (n = 116) or others (n = 26). 163 subjects had other cancer-related mutations which were evaluated in epigenetic regulators (n = 150), transcription factors (n = 84), cell signaling (n = 42), tumor suppressors (n = 39), protein kinases (n = 27), chromatin modification (n = 9) and DNA damage repair (n = 3) related-genes according to functional enrichment. The top 10 mutations were ASXL1 (n = 115), RUNX1 (n = 12), KMT2D (n = 12), PHF6 (n = 8), KMT2C (n = 8), IKZF1 (n = 8), STAT5A (n = 8), DNMT3A (n = 7), TET2 (n = 6) and BCOR (n = 6). 20 subjects had high-risk additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs). Frequency of BCR::ABL1 mutations was inversely- (p &lt; 0.001) and of cancer-related mutations directly-related (p = 0.009) to increasing exposure to prior TKI therapies. These relationships were especially so for mutations in KMT2C (p = 0.06), DNMT3A (p = 0.09), KDM6A (p = 0.06) and TNFAIP3 (p = 0.08). BCR::ABL1 (82% vs. 95%, p = 0.03), RUNX1 (5% vs. 14%, p = 0.04), KMT2C (3% vs. 10%, p = 0.08) and IKZF1 (3% vs. 10%, p = 0.10) were more common in accelerated phase. With a median follow-up of 34 months (interquartile range [IQR], 12-40 months), 95 and 71 subjects achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR). 18 subjects transformed to accelerated (n = 8) or blast (n = 10) phases, 16 died of disease progression (n = 12) or other causes (n = 4). 3-year cumulative incidences of CCyR and MMRwere 65% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 58, 71%) and 52% (43, 61%). 3-year probabilities of progression-free survival (PFS) and survival were 88% (81, 92%) and 91% (85, 95%). Mutations in tumor suppressor genes were more common in subjects not achieving a CCyR (27% vs. 19%, p = 0.01). In multi-variable analyses ASXL1 mutation with a VAF ≥ 17% and a PHF6 mutation were significantly associated with lower cumulative incidences of CCyR (p &lt; 0.001 and p = 0.032) and MMR (p &lt; 0.001 and p = 0.04). Moreover, subjects with BCR-ABL1T315I mutation had significantly higher cumulative incidences of CCyR (p = 0.07) and MMR (p = 0.04) than those with no BCR-ABL1 mutation and other BCR-ABL1 non-T315I mutation. Increasing age, more Ph 1-chromosome-positive cells, the best prior therapy-response &lt; partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) and more TKI-therapies were associated with poor responses. STAT5A mutation was significantly associated with worse PFS (p = 0.002) and survival (p &lt; 0.001), RUNX1 mutation (p = 0.006), high-risk ACAs (p = 0.07) and accelerated phase (p = 0.002) with worse PFS and increasing age (p = 0.05) and comorbidity(ies) (p = 0.05) with wosre survival. Conclusions ASXL1 mutations with a VAF ≥ 17% and PHF6 mutations were associated with poor responses of the 3 rd-generation TKI-therapy. STAT5A and RUNX1 mutations and high-risk ACAs were also associated with worse outcomes in persons receiving a 3 rd-generation TKI. These data should help physicians select people to receive 3 rd-generation TKIs. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

PF-114 in Patients Failing Prior Tyrosine Kinase-Inhibitor Therapy Including BCR::ABL1T315I

Background: Not everyone with CML responds optimally to TKI-therapy, especially those with BCR::ABL1T315I. PF-114 is a 4 th-generation oral tyrosine kinase-inhibitor (TKI) active against wild-type and mutated BCR::ABL1 isoforms including BCR::ABL1T315I. We present final results of a phase-1 study (NCT02885766). Methods: 3+3 dose-escalation study to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary objectives included safety and efficacy based on haematological, cytogenetic and molecular response criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Results: 51 subjects (5 with accelerated phase CML, 46 - with chronic CML), 23 males, were studied. Daily doses were 50-600 mg/d given once daily continuously. Median age was 50 y (range, 29-82 y). Median CML duration pre-study was 10 y (range, 0.3-23 y). 16 subjects had BCR::ABL1T315I. 25 subjects received ≥ 3 prior TKIs. Median follow-up was ≥ 31 mo and median exposure, 6 mo (range, 0.4-52). Therapy was ongoing in 7 subjects at study termination. Others discontinued because of progression (n = 20), AEs (n = 2), consent withdrawal (n = 5), entry into another study (n = 3) or other reasons (n = 14). The MTD was 600 mg with the grade-3 psoriasis-like skin AE as the DLT. There were no vascular occlusive events or deviations of ankle-brachial index. Complete haematologic response (CHR) was achieved in 14 of 30 subjects, major cytogenetic response (MCyR) in 15 of 44 subjects, complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) in 11 of 50 subjects and major molecular response (MMR) in 8 of 51 subjects. Median duration of CHR was 12 mo and has not been reached for MCyR, CCyR and MMR. The best safety/efficacy dose was 300 mg/d with 6 of 9 subjects achieving a MCyR, 5, a CCyR and 4, MMR. 5 of 16 subjects with BCR::ABL1T315I responded, including 4 achieving a MCyR, 2, a CCyR and 1, a MMR. 2 of 6 subjects failing ponatinib achieved a CHR. Conclusion: PF-114 was safe and effective in subjects failing ≥ 2 TKIs and those with BCR::ABL1T315I including those failing ponatinib. The PF-114 dose for further study is 300 mg/d. Disclosures Turkina: Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau. Vinogradova: Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau. Lomaia: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pharmstandard: Honoraria. Chelysheva: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau. Petrova: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau. Cortes: Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sun Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, BioPath Holdings, Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Baccarani: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ottmann: Fusion: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Mikhailov: Fusion Pharma: Current Employment. Novikov: Fusion Pharma: Current Employment. Shulgina: Fusion Pharma: Current Employment. Chilov: Fusion Pharma: Current Employment.

Multicenter, Prospective and Retrospective Observational Cohort Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML in Italy: Primary Analysis of the Oiti Trial

Background. Ponatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for adults with resistant or intolerant chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP), or blast phase (BP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or those carrying the T315I mutation. Ponatinib has been commercially available since January 2015, yet there is a paucity of data on its use in the real-world setting. The goal of the Observational study of Iclusig ® (ponatinib) Treatment in patients with CML in Italy (OITI) was to evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes, including safety and efficacy, in patients with CML treated in Italy since the approval of ponatinib. Methods. This noninterventional study included patients aged ≥18 years with CP, AP, or BP CML who initiated ponatinib treatment in routine clinical practice across 26 Italian centers (academic and hospital settings). The study population comprised a prospective cohort, including patients who started treatment with ponatinib after site activation during the 12-month enrollment period; a retrospective cohort, including patients who started treatment with ponatinib but died or were lost to follow-up prior to site activation; and a retrospective/prospective cohort, including patients who started treatment with ponatinib prior to site activation and were still on treatment or in follow-up at the end of the study. Demographic, efficacy, and safety data were collected from patient medical charts at study entry and routine visits. The primary endpoint was the complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate in CP CML patients 6 months after starting ponatinib. In the absence of cytogenetic evaluation, molecular assessment was used, considering patients in MR2 or better to be in CCyR. Here, the primary analysis of all evaluable patients for the primary endpoint (median follow-up, 23.7 months [range, 1.3-70.8]) is presented. Results. A total of 119 patients (110 CP, 6 AP, and 3 BP CML) were analyzed. Fifty-nine (49.6%) received ponatinib in second-line (2L), 41 (34.4%) in 3L, and 19 (16.0%) in ≥4L. Prior cardiovascular disease/hypertension was recorded in 56 (47.1%) patients. Median age at ponatinib start was 60 years (range, 19-93). Of 68 evaluated patients, 24 (35.3%) had a confirmed ABL1 mutation, including 7 (10.3%) with the T315I mutation. Starting doses of ponatinib were 45 mg (37.0%), 30 mg (41.2%), or 15 mg (21.8%). Median treatment duration was 22.8 months (range, 1.4-73.6). At baseline, 56 patients with CP CML had less than CCyR and 53 were in CCyR. For 1 patient, assessment was not available. At 6 months, 80/107 evaluable patients with CP CML were in CCyR; 29/56 (51.8%) achieved and 50/50 (100%) maintained CCyR compared to baseline, respectively. For 1 patient, baseline data were unavailable. Additionally, 37 (34.6%) and 19 (17.8%) patients with CP CML achieved a major molecular response (MMR; MR3) and a deep molecular response (MR4-MR5), respectively (Table 1). Progression-free survival rates estimated for patients with CP CML at 12 and 24 months were 92.6% (95% CI, 87.8-97.7%) and 84.6% (95% CI, 77.2-92.6%), respectively. Corresponding overall survival rates were 95.4% (95% CI, 91.6-99.4%), and 88.4% (95% CI, 81.7-95.7%). Seventy-one (59.7%) patients had treatment-related adverse events (AEs), most commonly rash, hypertension (Grade 1-2), and thrombocytopenia (Grade 3). Treatment-related arterial occlusive events occurred in 2 (1.7%) patients. Dose modifications occurred in 77 patients: 37.1% were due to AEs, 13.5% were reductions after at least major cytogenetic response, 10.6% were increases due to lack of efficacy, 1.7% were medical decisions, and 37.1% were for other reasons. Thirty-three patients discontinued ponatinib due to AEs (33.3%), medical decisions (24.2%), and other reasons (42.4%), such as death, progression, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Conclusions. This observational study demonstrates that ponatinib has a favorable efficacy and safety profile in patients with CML treated in standard clinical practice. By 6 months, 74.8% of evaluable patients were in CCyR and 52.3% achieved at least MMR. Further, the probability of survival at 2 years was &gt;88%. No new safety signals emerged with ponatinib treatment compared to prior studies. The early use of ponatinib and careful dose selection appear key to the safety and efficacy outcomes observed in this real-world study. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Breccia: Abbvie: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Abruzzese: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bonifacio: Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Castagnetti: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Galimberti: Inctye Bioscience Italy Srl: Current Employment. Iurlo: Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau.

Treatment Responses in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia on Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) Therapy

Background: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a cancer of white blood cells results by the BCR-ABL translocation. Part of BCR gene from chromosome 22 is fused with ABL gene on chromosome 9. Aim: To observe percentage of patients achieving Cytogenetics response (CR), and Deep molecular response (DMR) in CML patients taking TKI (Imatinib and Nilotinib). Study Design: Retrospective Cohort study. Methodology: This study was conducted in 2018-2019 in about 198 CML patients to evaluate TKI therapy response and observation was based upon their Quantitative PCR test which gave percentage of BCR-ABL gene translocation in IU. Patients which were diagnosed with CML in 2016 and was regular in their treatment for about 2 years were included in the study. No intervention was given as in vivo study. Statistical analysis: Data analyzed by SPSS 25.0v. Results: Results showed that out of 198 CML patients, started on 1st line TKI (imatinib) 95 males (48%) and 103 females (52%) showed cytogenetic response at start of therapy and after 2 years of therapy 157 (79.3%) patient showed DMR. Conclusion: This study concluded that regular 2-year treatment of chronic CML patients with TKIs produced significant response in patients. Keywords: BCR-ABL Translocation, Cytogenetic Response, Major Molecular Response, Complete Molecular Response and Deep Molecular Response.

A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Asciminib, a STAMP Inhibitor, vs Bosutinib in CML After ≥2 Prior TKIs

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) resistant or intolerant to ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are at high risk of experiencing poor outcomes due to disease biology and inadequate efficacy and/or safety of current therapies. Asciminib is a first-in-class STAMP (Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket) inhibitor with the potential to overcome resistance or intolerance to approved TKIs. In this phase 3, open-label study, patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 TKIs were randomized (2:1) to receive asciminib 40 mg twice daily vs bosutinib 500 mg once daily. Randomization was stratified by major cytogenetic response (MCyR) status at baseline. The primary objective was to compare the major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 24 for asciminib vs bosutinib. Two hundred and thirty-three patients were randomized to asciminib (n=157) or bosutinib (n=76). Median follow-up was 14.9 months. The MMR rate at week 24 was 25.5% with asciminib and 13.2% with bosutinib. The difference in MMR rate between treatment arms, after adjusting for MCyR at baseline, was 12.2% (95% CI, 2.19-22.30; 2-sided P=.029). Fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (50.6% vs 60.5%) and fewer adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (5.8% vs 21.1%) occurred with asciminib than with bosutinib. The study showed a superior efficacy of asciminib compared with that of bosutinib, together with a favorable safety profile. These results support the use of asciminib as a new therapy in patients with CML-CP who are resistant or intolerant to ≥2 prior TKIs. The trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03106779.

Impact of frontline treatment approach on outcomes of myeloid blast phase CML

Background The natural course of untreated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is progression to an aggressive blast phase. Even in the current era of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the outcomes of blast phase CML remain poor with no consensus frontline treatment approach. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the response rates and survival outcomes of 104 consecutive patients with myeloid blast phase CML (CML-MBP) treated from 2000 to 2019 based on 4 different frontline treatment approaches: intensive chemotherapy (IC) + TKI (n = 20), hypomethylating agent (HMA) + TKI (n = 20), TKI alone (n = 56), or IC alone (n = 8). We also evaluated the impact of TKI selection and subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) on patient outcomes. Results Response rates were similar between patients treated with IC + TKI and HMA + TKI. Compared to treatment with TKI alone, treatment with IC/HMA + TKI resulted in a higher rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (57.5% vs 33.9%, p < 0.05), a higher complete cytogenetic response rate (45% vs 10.7%, p < 0.001), and more patients proceeding to ASCT (32.5% vs 10.7%, p < 0.01). With a median follow-up of 6.7 years, long-term outcomes were similar between the IC + TKI and HMA + TKI groups. Combination therapy with IC/HMA + TKI was superior to therapy with TKI alone, including when analysis was limited to those treated with a 2nd/3rd-generation TKI. When using a 2nd/3rd-generation TKI, IC/HMA + TKI led to lower 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR; 44% vs 86%, p < 0.05) and superior 5-year event-free survival (EFS; 28% vs 0%, p < 0.05) and overall survival (OS; 34% vs 8%, p = 0.23) compared to TKI alone. Among patients who received IC/HMA + TKI, EFS and OS was superior for patients who received a 2nd/3rd generation TKI compared to those who received imatinib-based therapy. In a landmark analysis, 5-year OS was higher for patients who proceeded to ASCT (58% vs 22%, p = 0.12). Conclusions Compared to patients treated with TKI alone for CML-MBP, treatment with IC + TKI or HMA + TKI led to improved response rates, CIR, EFS, and OS, particularly for patients who received a 2nd/3rd-generation TKI. Combination therapy with IC + TKI or HMA + TKI, rather than a TKI alone, should be considered the optimal treatment strategy for patients with CML-MBP.

Second-line bosutinib (BOS) for patients (pts) with chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): Final 10-year results of a phase 1/2 study.

7009 Background: BOS is approved for Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)+ CML resistant/intolerant to prior therapy and newly diagnosed Ph+ CP CML. In a phase 1/2 study, second-line BOS showed durable efficacy and manageable toxicity in pts with imatinib-resistant (IM-R) or -intolerant (IM-I) Ph+ CP CML. Methods: This final efficacy and safety analysis of the phase 1/2 study and extension study was based on ≥10 y of follow-up (FU). Ph+ CP CML pts who received BOS starting at 500 mg/d after prior treatment (Tx) with imatinib only were included. Results: 19% of pts were on BOS at y 10, and 13% were still on BOS at study completion after ≥10 y; 19% completed ≥10 y of FU. Median duration of Tx and FU were 26 and 54 mo, respectively. Median (range) dose intensity was 436 (87–599) mg/d. The most common primary reasons for permanent Tx discontinuation were lack of efficacy (unsatisfactory response or disease progression; 27%) and adverse events (AEs; 26%). In pts with a valid baseline assessment, cumulative complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) and MR4 rates (95% CI), respectively, were 50% (43–56), 42% (35–49) and 37% (30–44) (IM-R: 48% [41–56], 46% [37–55] and 39% [31–48]; IM-I: 53% [41–64], 36% [25–48] and 33% [22–45]). Responses were durable, with estimated probabilities of maintaining CCyR, MMR and MR4 > 50% after ≥10 y (Table). At 10 y, cumulative incidence of on-Tx progression/death was 24% and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) overall survival 72% (Table); 55 deaths (IM-R: n = 41; IM-I: n = 14) occurred on study, none BOS-related. Any grade Tx-emergent AEs (TEAEs) in ≥40% of pts were diarrhea (86%), nausea (46%) and thrombocytopenia (42%). Pleural effusion, cardiac and vascular TEAEs occurred in 13%, 12% and 11% of pts, respectively. 28% of pts had AEs leading to permanent Tx discontinuation; most common (≥2% of pts) were thrombocytopenia (6%), neutropenia (2%) and alanine aminotransferase increased (2%). Conclusions: These 10-y data are consistent with prior results of durable efficacy and manageable toxicity with second-line BOS and support long-term BOS use in CP CML pts after imatinib failure. Clinical trial information: NCT00261846 and NCT01903733. [Table: see text]

A Case Report of BCR-ABL-JAK2-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with Complete Hematological and Major Molecular Response to Dasatinib

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) that harbors the Philadelphia chromosomal translocation resulting in the uncontrolled production of mature granulocytes. Commonly, patients are diagnosed with CML during blood work for other reasons or enlarged spleen. The diagnosis is based on WHO criteria that require the demonstration of Philadelphia chromosome. Typically, <i>JAK2</i> mutation is not found in <i>BCR-ABL1</i>-positive MPN (CML). Most patients with CML are <i>JAK2</i> negative. It is rare for CML Philadelphia-positive patients to have a coexisting <i>JAK2</i> mutation. Little is known regarding the effect of <i>JAK2</i> mutation on the disease course of CML, the complications, and the response to treatment. We report the case of a 57-year-old man with no previous medical illness who presented with elevated white blood cell count on perioperative assessment for hernial repair; on further workup, he was diagnosed with Philadelphia-positive CML. He was found to have <i>JAK2</i> mutation and was started on treatment with dasatinib and achieved hematological and cytogenetic remission with loss of the <i>JAK2</i> mutation. Patients with <i>JAK2</i>-positive <i>BCR-ABL</i>-positive CML had a good hematological and cytogenetic response to dasatinib. In such rare coexistence of <i>JAK</i> and <i>BCR-ABL</i>, dasatinib is a good option due to multi-kinase activity.