scholarly journals E-Iron: Rethinking the Way We Deliver Intravenous Iron. Report of a Pilot Telemedicine Initiative

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
Mark Chaitowitz ◽  
Sharon Rikin

Introduction Iron deficiency is common in the community, affecting upwards of a third of females in their childbearing years. The majority of patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) will be successfully managed with simple oral iron supplementation. However, a substantial proportion will only achieve normal hematocrits after protracted courses of treatment, often entailing significant GI toxicity. In recent years, with the availability of formulations that allow for total dose infusion, the role of intravenous iron (IVI) has become increasingly appreciated as a rapid, reliable, and safe strategy in addressing IDA. Historically, at our institution and at many others, the path to IVI treatment entails initial referral to hematology, a face-to-face evaluation at a hematology clinic, followed by scheduling for infusion on another visit. The median time from referral to infusion is approximately 35 days, with timing of infusions determined not by clinical considerations, but by chair availability and the whims of non-clinical personnel entrusted with the scheduling. Inappropriate delays are common, and of practical import when occurring, say, in pregnant women approaching their due dates, or patients scheduled for surgery. With the purpose of expediting the above process, capitalizing on a robust e-consult platform already operational at our institution, e-IRON was made available to referring providers as a function in the EPIC EMR, that facilitates an 'electronic' referral to hematology, for consideration for IVI. A template-based design ensures that all information required (indication, experience with oral iron, current lab-work, etc.) is included. Following the institutional protocol for e-consults, e-IRON referrals are 'chart-reviewed' by a specialist hematologist within 3 business days, and a determination regarding IVI is made. If deemed appropriate, the patient is scheduled for infusion within 10 business days. The specialist also specifies whether a face-to-face hematology appointment is required, and in cases where IVI is not deemed appropriate, will provide guidance as to alternate management. Results During the initial 75 day evaluation period 81 e-IRON referral were received. Indications are listed in table 1, and responses in table 2. The largest subgroup of referrals was from the prenatal clinics, likely as a result of a proactive protocol for management of IDA in pregnancy adopted by the department of obstetrics in conjunction with hematology. Of note, IVI was approved and scheduled for 60 of 81 (74%) patients, of which only 2 were required to be seen by hematology. Reasons for non-approval of IVI varied, but the most common reason cited was an inadequate trial of oral iron, in which case specific instructions were provided for oral iron supplementation. In one notable case, wherein a referred patient's anemia was felt to be discordant with his degree of iron deficiency, a more extensive workup was recommended resulting in a diagnosis of previously unsuspected myeloma. Recommendations were generated within 3 business days for 77 (95%) consults and in 1 day for 47 (58%). Recommended IVI regimens all entailed 1 or 2 infusion days, depending on the estimated iron deficit, and all first infusions were scheduled within 2 weeks of the request. Conclusion The e-IRON pilot project demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of a telemedicine approach in triaging, and expediting the management of patients requiring IVI. Using a template-based e-consult platform, reviewing hematologists are in the vast majority of cases able to rapidly determine appropriate management, and facilitate IVI when appropriate. The platform ensures effective supervision by specialist hematologists, but dispenses with the laborious, costly, and time consuming traditional requirement of a face-to-face visit to the hematology clinic. The value of this paradigm shift in patient care is underscored by lessons learned during the ongoing COVID19 pandemic. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2000 ◽  
pp. 217-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Zimmermann ◽  
P Adou ◽  
T Torresani ◽  
C Zeder ◽  
R Hurrell

OBJECTIVE: In developing countries, many children are at high risk for both goiter and iron-deficiency anemia. Because iron deficiency may impair thyroid metabolism, the aim of this study was to determine if iron supplementation improves the response to oral iodine in goitrous, iron-deficient anemic children. DESIGN: A trial of oral iodized oil followed by oral iron supplementation in an area of endemic goiter in the western Ivory Coast. METHODS: Goitrous, iodine-deficient children (aged 6-12 years; n=109) were divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of goitrous children who were not anemic; Group 2 consisted of goitrous children who were iron-deficient anemic. Both groups were given 200mg oral iodine as iodized oil. Thyroid gland volume using ultrasound, urinary iodine concentration (UI), serum thyroxine (T(4)) and whole blood TSH were measured at baseline, and at 1, 5, 10, 15 and 30 weeks post intervention. Beginning at 30 weeks, the anemic group was given 60mg oral iron as ferrous sulfate four times/week for 12 weeks. At 50 and 65 weeks after oral iodine (8 and 23 weeks after completing iron supplementation), UI, TSH, T(4) and thyroid volume were remeasured. RESULTS: The prevalence of goiter at 30 weeks after oral iodine in Groups 1 and 2 was 12% and 64% respectively. Mean percent change in thyroid volume compared with baseline at 30 weeks in Groups 1 and 2 was -45.1% and -21.8% respectively (P<0.001 between groups). After iron supplementation in Group 2, there was a further decrease in mean thyroid volume from baseline in the anemic children (-34.8% and -38.4% at 50 and 65 weeks) and goiter prevalence fell to 31% and 20% at 50 and 65 weeks. CONCLUSION: Iron supplementation may improve the efficacy of oral iodized oil in goitrous children with iron-deficiency anemia.


Author(s):  
Giulio Giordano ◽  
Mariasanta Napolitano ◽  
Valeria Di Battista ◽  
Alessandro Lucchesi

AbstractIron deficiency anemia is among the most frequent causes of disability. Intravenous iron is the quickest way to correct iron deficiency, bypassing the bottleneck of iron intestinal absorption, the only true mechanism of iron balance regulation in human body. Intravenous iron administration is suggested in patients who are refractory/intolerant to oral iron sulfate. However, the intravenous way of iron administration requires several precautions; as the in-hospital administration requires a resuscitation service, as imposed in Europe by the European Medicine Agency, it is very expensive and negatively affects patient’s perceived quality of life. A new oral iron formulation, Sucrosomial iron, bypassing the normal way of absorption, seems to be cost-effective in correcting iron deficiency anemia at doses higher than those usually effective with other oral iron formulations. In this multicentric randomized study, we analyze the cost-effectiveness of intravenous sodium ferrigluconate vs oral Sucrosomial iron in patients with iron deficiency anemia refractory/intolerant to oral iron sulfate without other interfering factors on iron absorption.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2052-2052
Author(s):  
Eldad A. Hod ◽  
Eric H. Ekland ◽  
Shruti Sharma ◽  
Boguslaw S. Wojczyk ◽  
David A. Fidock ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2052 To clarify the interactions between iron status, oral iron supplementation, and bacterial and malarial infections, we examined iron-replete mice and mice with dietary iron deficiency infected with Salmonella typhimurium, Plasmodium yoelii, or both, with and without oral iron administration. These studies were designed to identify potential mechanisms underlying the increased risk of severe illness and death in children in a malaria-endemic region who received routine iron and folic acid supplementation during a randomized, controlled trial in Pemba, Tanzania (Sazawal et al. Lancet 2006;367:133-43). To this end, weanling C57BL/6 female mice were fed an iron-replete or an iron-deficient diet, the latter of which resulted in severe iron deficiency anemia. Groups of mice were then infected by intraperitoneal injection of Salmonella typhimurium strain LT2, Plasmodium yoelii strain 17X parasites, or both. With Salmonella infection alone, iron-deficient mice had a median survival (7.5 days, N=8) approximately half that of iron-replete mice (13 days, N=10, p<0.0001). At death, the mean level of bacteremia was significantly higher in infected iron-deficient mice. In blood cultures performed at death, all iron-deficient mice were bacteremic, but bacteria were detected in only 4 of 10 iron-replete mice. Both iron-deficient and iron-replete Salmonella-infected mice had gross hepatosplenomegaly with hepatitis, distorted hepatic and splenic architecture, massive expansion of the splenic red pulp with inflammatory cells, and Gram-negative bacilli by tissue Gram stain. With P. yoelii infection alone, iron-deficient and iron-replete mice cleared the infection at similar rates (by ~13 days following infection, N=5 in each group) and no deaths due to parasitemia occurred. With Salmonella and P. yoelii co-infection, death was earlier than with Salmonella alone in iron-replete mice (median survival of 10 vs. 13 days; N=10 in each group; p=0.005), but not in iron-deficient mice (median survival of 7 vs. 7.5 days; N=10 and 8, respectively; p=0.8). To examine the effect of short-term oral iron supplementation with Salmonella infection alone, mice received daily iron (ferrous sulfate, 1 mg/kg) by gavage for 4 days before infection with Salmonella, and supplementation continued for a total of 10 days. After gavage, plasma non-transferrin-bound iron (NTBI) appeared at 1–2 hours with a mean peak level of approximately 5 μM. In iron-deficient mice, short-term oral iron supplementation did not fully correct the iron deficiency anemia or replenish iron stores. Oral iron supplementation reduced the median survival of both iron-deficient and iron-replete Salmonella-infected mice by approximately 1 day; the difference was significant only in the iron-replete group (N=5, p<0.05). In summary, these results indicate that iron deficiency decreases the survival of Salmonella-infected mice; the median survival of iron-deficient mice was approximately half that of those that were iron replete. These observations are similar to those in the Pemba sub-study in which iron-deficient children given placebo had a 200% increase in the risk of adverse events relative to iron-replete children. Iron deficiency had no apparent effect on the course of infection with P. yoelii but further studies with more virulent Plasmodium species are needed. Co-infection with Salmonella and Plasmodium significantly increased mortality as compared to single infections, but only in iron-replete mice. Oral iron supplementation of Salmonella-infected mice significantly decreased the median survival, but only of iron-replete animals; however, our study may have had insufficient power to detect an effect on iron-deficient mice. Systematic examination in mice of the effect of iron supplements on the severity of malarial and bacterial infection in iron-replete and iron-deficient states may ultimately help guide the safe and effective use of iron interventions in humans in areas with endemic malaria. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibel Bilgili ◽  
Giray Bozkaya ◽  
Funda Kırtay Tütüncüler ◽  
Murat Akşit ◽  
Mehmet Yavuz

AbstractObjective:The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), before and after oral iron supplementation in iron deficiency anemia and to determine the correlations between IMA and hemoglobin values.Study design:IMA, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, ferritin, iron, total iron binding capacity and albumin levels were measured in 140 female patients with newly established as iron deficiency anemia before and after treatment and in 84 female healthy controls.Results:IMA levels were higher in the anemia group [0.340±0.082 absorbance units (ABSU)] compared to control group (0.291±0.077 ABSU). After oral iron therapy we saw that IMA values (0.392±0.080 ABSU) were higher than the IMA levels of the anemia group and the control group (p<0.05). Only in the anemia group there were negative correlations between IMA and hemoglobin, hematocrit.Conclusion:We conclude that the high levels of IMA in the anemia group might be attributed to hypoxia due to low hemoglobin levels. Iron is an oxidant element and oral iron supplementation may be associated with oxidative stress and may increase IMA levels by changing the albumin molecule. We thought that, IMA can be demonstrative of the severity of anemia since it was correlated with hemoglobin in the anemia group.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3076-3076
Author(s):  
Rebecka Hansen ◽  
Joergen Kurtzhals ◽  
Bjarne Styrishave ◽  
Charlotte Holm

Abstract Introduction: Hepcidin, the master regulator of iron economy, is decreased during pregnancy to facilitate adequate iron transfer across the placenta. Conversely, iron need increases substantially during pregnancy often leading to iron deficiency and subsequently anemia. The PREG-01 Study compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) ferric derisomaltose (FDI) vs. oral iron in treating persistent iron deficiency in pregnant women. The study found FDI to be efficacious and well-tolerated in pregnancy and the proportion of non-anaemic patients throughout the course of the study was significantly lower in the FDI group. In this analysis, we investigated the effect of baseline hepcidin on the response to IV and oral iron therapy. Methods: PREG-01 was a single-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Women 14-21 weeks pregnant with persistent iron deficiency (ferritin&lt;30 µg/L despite oral iron treatment) received a single intravenous 1000 mg dose of FDI (n=100) or 100 mg elemental oral iron daily combined with ascorbic acid (n=101). Hemoglobin (Hb), ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT%) levels were captured at baseline and monitored throughout the study. The effect of baseline hepcidin on achieving non-anemic status (Hb ≥ 11 g/dL) at all study visits and the effect on change in Hb, ferritin and TSAT% were investigated by estimating odds ratios from a logistic regression model with treatment as factor and interaction between treatment and baseline hepcidin. The odds ratio estimate is for an increment in baseline hepcidin of 1 ng/mL. Results: Mean [standard deviation (SD)] baseline Hb was 11.97 (0.93) g/dL in the FDI group and 11.75 (0.91) g/dL in the oral iron group. Baseline hepcidin was 6.42 ng/mL in the FDI and 5.32 ng/mL in the oral iron group. Baseline hepcidin was not associated with the ability to achieve non-anaemic status either in the FDI (OR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.87-1.09) or the oral iron group (OR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.88-1.05). No statistically significant associations were found between baseline hepcidin and change in Hb, ferritin or TSAT% throughout the study (Figure 1). Conclusions: In a population of pregnant women with iron deficiency, but otherwise healthy, baseline hepcidin was overall low. Although there was a trend for an association between baseline hepcidin and Hb response to oral iron only, baseline hepcidin did not predict the response to iron therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: Ferric Derisomaltose is an IV iron preparation indicated for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in the US.


Author(s):  
Satish Kumar

Introduction: Anemia is the commonest major contributing factor in maternal mortality and morbidity in developing countries and according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, it contributes to 20% of maternal deaths. Anemia in pregnancy defined as hemoglobin level <11 gm/dl (7.45 mmol/L) and hematocrit less than 33% (WHO). Aim: To compare the efficacy of oral iron ferrous sulphate therapy with intravenous iron sucrose therapy in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia during postpartum period. Material & Methods: This was a prospective randomized comparative clinical trial single center study conducted on 200 postpartum women aged >18 years (after normal delivery or LSCS) within 10 days of delivery with Hb level more or equal to 6 gm/dl but less than 10 gm/dl were included in the study. This was a one year study conducted during 1st December 2018 to 30th November 2019. Results : There was a significant increase in the hemoglobin level in both the groups i.e. in IV iron group, from 8.26 ±1.03gm/dl on day 1 to 11.62±0.94gm/dl on day 45 as compared to oral iron group, from 8.24±1.09gm/dl on day 1 to 11.07±1.14gm/dl on day 45; and serum ferritin level from 41.69±40.45ng/ml on day 1 to 77.34±41.60ng/ml on day 45 in IV iron group as compared to the oral iron group from 22.20±8.82ng/ml on day 1 to 31.72±9.72 ng/ml on day 45. So, there was a rapid increase in both hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels in IV iron group as compared to the oral iron group. Conclusion: Intravenous iron sucrose administration increases the hemoglobin level and serum ferritin more rapidly in compare to the oral intake of ferrous sulphate in women with iron deficiency anemia in postpartum women in our study. Keywords: Iron deficiency anemia, Intravenous iron sucrose, Serum ferritin, Maternal mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document