scholarly journals Validation of New International Prognostic Scores, Including Baseline Peripheral Blood Variables, in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and HIV Infection Treated with R-CHOP and Combined Antiretroviral Therapy. Retrospective Study from Spanish Lymphoma Group Geltamo

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2497-2497
Author(s):  
Maria Huguet ◽  
Mireia Morgades ◽  
Armando Lopez-Guillermo ◽  
Alfredo Rivas-Delgado ◽  
Mariana Bastos-Oreiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Combined Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Cd4 Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Cd4 Lymphocyte

Abstract Background Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent subtype of HIV-associated lymphoma. Since the introduction of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), the prognosis of HIV-related DLBCL has substantially improved, resembling that of the general population. However, non-Hodgkin lymphoma still remains the first cause of AIDS-related deaths. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is the most widely used score for DLBCL and it has been validated in the rituximab era (R-IPI). However, it has limited accuracy to identify a very high-risk prognostic subset. Although IPI has been demonstrated to be useful for predicting prognosis in HIV-related DLBCL, new scores subsequently developed, such as National Cancer Comprehensive Network IPI (NCCN-IPI), GELTAMO-IPI and a new score, which includes data from peripheral blood count, have not been applied in the HIV setting. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of the new variables -beta2-microglobulin (β2M), lymphocyte/monocyte (L/M) ratio and red blood cell width (RDW)- and to validate the new scores in a series of homogeneously treated HIV-related DLBCL patients. Methods Retrospective multicentric study of patients with HIV infection diagnosed with DLBCL in 16 hospitals from GELTAMO group in Spain, from 1998 to 2020. All patients were treated with R-CHOP and cART +/- radiotherapy. The main clinical and biological variables were collected. Peripheral absolute neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte counts were studied, including L/M ratio and CD4 + lymphocyte count. Moreover, HIV load, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), β2M and RDW were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed using the binary logistic regression model for complete response (CR) rate and Cox proportional-hazards regression model for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. The discrimination power of IPI, aaIPI (age-adjusted IPI), R-IPI, NCCN-IPI, GELTAMO-IPI and the new score including L/M ratio (L Bento et al., Br J Haematol. 2020) was assessed by the C-index. Results One hundred and five patients were retrospectively analysed with a median follow up of 7.08 (0.36-25.21) years. The characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. In the univariable analysis, performance status ≥2, extranodal sites ≥2, lymphocytopenia and low L/M ratio were associated with shorter OS and shorter PFS probabilities. Neutropenia was also associated with lower OS and advanced Ann Arbor stage was associated with lower PFS. On the other hand, monocytosis, low CD4 + lymphocyte count, positive HIV load and high values of serum LDH, RDW and β2M had no prognostic impact. By multivariable analysis, only L/M ratio <3 emerged as an unfavourable prognostic factor for OS and PFS, with harzard ratios (HR) (95%CI) of 2.515 (1.256;5.039) and 2.563 (1.314;5), respectively (Figure 1). With the aim of validating the prognostic power of each score system, the patients were divided in two groups: patients corresponding with low or intermediate-low risk versus those with intermediate-high or high risk. R-IPI, NCCN-IPI and the new score including L/M ratio showed significant differences in two groups for CR rate, OS and PFS. IPI also significantly discriminated the groups for PFS. NCCN-IPI was the strongest score to discriminate OS with a C-index of 0.638, and the new score including L/M ratio was the best one for CR rate and PFS discrimination, with a C-index of 0.669 and 0.666 respectively. Conclusions Lymphocyte/monocyte ratio is a strong prognostic factor, which can be used in patients with DLBCL and HIV infection. NCCN-IPI and the new score including L/M ratio provided the best discriminative capacity to predict prognosis in patients with HIV-related DLBCL treated with R-CHOP and cART. Supported in part by Gilead Sciences S.L., Spain (GLD19/00121); 2017 SGR288 (GRE) from CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya, and by funds from Josep Carreras International Foundation and "la Caixa" Foundation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lopez-Guillermo: Roche, Gilead/Kite, Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, AbbVie, Spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Salar: Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding. de la Cruz Vicente: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Ferrer Lores: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abrisqueta: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sancho: Roche, Janssen, Celgene-BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche, Janssen, Celgene-BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Incyte, Beigene: Speakers Bureau. Ribera: SHIRE: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TAKEDA: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Navarro: NOVARTIS, Roche: Honoraria; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy; GILEAD, EUSA Pharma: Research Funding.

Phase II Study Of Anti-CD19 Antibody Drug Conjugate (SAR3419) In Combination With Rituximab: Clinical Activity and Safety In Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (NCT01470456)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4395-4395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Sophie de Guibert ◽  
Jehan Dupuis ◽  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background SAR3419 is a humanized anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to maytansin DM4, a potent cytotoxic agent. SAR3419 targets CD19, an antigen expressed in the majority of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). The recommended dose for single agent SAR3419 was previously determined to be 55 mg/m2 administered IV every week for 4 weeks, then bi-weekly. In phase I, clinical activity was shown mainly in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). (Trial funded by Sanofi). Methods Patients (pts) with a CD20+ and CD19+ DLBCL relapsing or refractory (R/R) after at least 1 standard treatment including rituximab and not candidate for or who already underwent transplantation, were eligible. Refractory disease was defined as unresponsive to or progressing within 6 months of regimen completion. Fresh (or recent formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) biopsy was required before SAR3419 start. Pts received 375 mg/m2 of rituximab (R) IV and 55 mg/m² of SAR3419 on day 1, 8, 15, 22 (35-day cycle 1), followed by bi-weekly R and SAR3419 at the same doses for 2 additional 28-day cycles, provided there was no disease progression or other study discontinuation criteria met. The primary objective was the overall response rate (ORR) following Cheson 2007 criteria, with the first tumor assessment being done 42 days after the last study treatment administration. Secondary objectives were: safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), duration of response (DOR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and correlation of the antitumor and biological activity of the combination with tumor biomarker status. Results Fifty-three pts were enrolled, 52 treated. Median age was 66.5 years (range 38-85), 50% were male; 23%, 33% and 40% of patients had received 1, 2 or ≥3 prior chemo/immunotherapy regimens for DLBCL, respectively. Of the enrolled patients, 3.8% had received no prior regimen for DLBCL and therefore were excluded from primary analysis for efficacy. Seventy-three percent had stage III/IV disease, 59% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and 63% had bulky disease. Sixty percent were refractory to first regimen (primary refractory), 16% were refractory to last regimen and 24% were relapsed pts. The ORR in the per-protocol population (n=45) was 31.1% (80% confidence interval (CI): 22.0% to 41.6%). Among the 14 responders, 5 had progressed at the time of analysis, with duration of response beyond 6 months for 3 of them. The ORR was 58.3% (80% CI: 36.2% to 78.1%) for patients with relapsed DLBCL (n=12), 42.9% (80% CI: 17.0% to 72.1%) for pts refractory to last regimen (n=7) and 15.4% (80% CI: 6.9% to 28.4%) for primary refractory pts (n=26). Overall survival and PFS data are not yet mature. Biomarkers and PK data will be presented at the meeting. The most common (≥10%) all grades non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were asthenia (25.0%), nausea (21.2%), cough (19.2%), diarrhea (17.3%), weight decrease (17.3%), vomiting (15.4%), dyspnea (15.4%), abdominal pain (13.5%), back pain (13.5%), pyrexia (13.5%) and constipation (11.5%). Related grade 3-4 TEAEs were: 1 syncope, 1 bronchospasm, 2 neutropenia and 1 anemia. No TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation, no grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy or grade 3-4 ocular events were observed. Two pts experienced grade 2 keratitis, both rapidly recovered with local treatment. Hematological toxicity was moderate, with grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 15.7% and 9.8% pts, respectively. No complications related to neutropenia were reported. Grade 3 transaminase increase was observed in 1 patient. Conclusions The combination of SAR3419 plus R showed moderate ORR in R/R DLBCL; however the study population was of poor prognosis (60% refractory to first line therapy). In the relapsed DLBCL patients a higher ORR was observed. SAR3419 plus R presented with a favorable safety profile. Further investigations on biomarker expression are ongoing to identify a sub-group of pts who could have better benefited from this combination. Disclosures: Coiffier: Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Phase II of SAR3419. Ribrag:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cartron:LFB: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Casasnovas:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hatteville:Sanofi: Employment. Zilocchi:Sanofi: Employment. Oprea:Sanofi: Employment. Tilly:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

An International Collaborative Study of Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Secondary CNS Involvement By Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1874-1874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly ◽  
Chan Yoon Cheah ◽  
Mette Dahl Bendtsen ◽  
Gita Thanarasjasingam ◽  
Roopesh Kansara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma

Abstract Background: Secondary CNS involvement (SCNS) is a detrimental complication seen in ~5% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with modern immunochemotherapy. Data from older series report short survival following SCNS, typically <6 months. However, data in patients that develop SCNS following primary therapy that contains a rituximab-based-regimen as well as the impact of more intensified treatment for SCNS are limited. Aims: The aims of this study were to i) describe the natural history of SCNS in a large cohort of patients treated with immunochemotherapy, and ii) determine prognostic factors after SCNS. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with SCNS during or after frontline immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP or equivalently effective regimens). SCNS was defined as new involvement of the CNS (parenchymal, leptomeningeal, and/or eye) in patients without known CNS involvement at the time of first pathologic diagnosis of DLBCL. Patients were identified from local databases and/or regional/national registries in Denmark, Canada (British Columbia), Australia, Israel, US (University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic SPORE), and England (Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London). Clinico-pathologic and treatment characteristics at the time of SCNS were collected from medical records. Results: In total, 281 patients with SCNS diagnosed between 2001 and 2016 were included. Median age at SCNS was 64 (range 20-93) years and male:female ratio was 1.3. SCNS occurred as part of first relapse in 244 (87%) patients and 112 (40%) had documented concurrent systemic disease at the time of SCNS. The median time from initial DLBCL diagnosis to SCNS was 9 months, which was similar for patients treated with (N=76, 27%) or without upfront CNS prophylaxis (N=205, 73%) (10 vs 9 Mo; P=0.3). The median post-SCNS OS was 4 months (interquartile range 2-13) and the 2yr survival rate was 20% (95% CI 15-25) for the entire cohort. Associations between clinicopathologic features, management strategy, and post-SCNS survival are shown in Table 1, which excludes patients who did not receive any treatment against SCNS, patients treated with steroids alone, and a patient with unavailable treatment information (n=43, 15%). In multivariable analysis, performance status >1, concurrent leptomeningeal and parenchymal involvement, SCNS developing before completion of 1st line treatment, and combined systemic and CNS involvement by DLBCL were associated with inferior outcomes. Upfront CNS prophylaxis did not influence post-SCNS OS. High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) and/or platinum based treatment regimens (i.e. ICE, DHAP, or GDP [+/- IT treatment and/or radiotherapy], N=163) for SCNS were associated with reduced risk of death (HR 0.45 [0.32-0.62, P<0.01]). The 2yr post-SCNS survival for patients treated with HDMTX and/or platinum-based regimens (N=163) was 29% (95% CI 22-37). For patients with isolated parenchymal SCNS, single modality treatment with radiotherapy resulted in 2-yr OS of 19% (95% CI 8-35). For the subgroup of 49 patients treated with HDMTX- and/or platinum-based regimens for isolated SCNS after 1st line DLBCL treatment and with performance status 0 or 1, the 2yr post-SCNS survival was 46% (95% CI 31-59). Overall, 9% of the patients received HDT with ASCT as part of salvage therapy at the time of SCNS. Amongst 36 SCNS patients without systemic involvement and in CR following intensive treatment (HDMTX and/or platinum-based treatments), 11 patients consolidated with HDT had similar outcomes to 25 patients treated without consolidating HDT (P=0.9, Fig 1) Conclusions: Outcomes for patients with SCNS remain poor in this large international cohort of patients from the immunochemotherapy era. Combined parenchymal and leptomeningeal disease, presence of systemic disease concurrent with SCNS, performance status >1, and SCNS developing during first line treatment were independently associated with inferior OS. However, a significant fraction of patients with isolated SCNS after first line DLBCL treatment and with good performance status may achieve long-term remissions after intensive regimens for SCNS. Disclosures El-Galaly: Roche: Consultancy, Other: travel funding. Cheah:Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker's Bureau. Kansara:Celgene: Honoraria. Connors:Bristol Myers Squib: Research Funding; NanoString Technologies: Research Funding; F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Sehn:roche/genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; seattle genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Opat:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Provision of subsidised drugs, Research Funding. Seymour:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Villa:Celgene: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Safety of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Elderly Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 96-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dahlia Sano ◽  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Nathan H. Fowler ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
F. B. Hagemeister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Car T ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy product that was FDA approved for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after at least two lines of systemic therapy. In the pivotal ZUMA-1 study, the best overall response (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates observed in 108 patients treated with axi-cel were 82% and 58%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of the patients remain in ongoing response (Neelapu et al. N Eng J Med 2017). Analysis of efficacy outcomes in patients <65 years (N=81) and ³65 years (N=27) showed that the ORR and ongoing response at 12 months were comparable between the two subgroups (Neelapu et al. N Eng J Med 2017). Whether the safety is also comparable between the two subgroups is unknown. Here, we report safety outcomes in elderly patients (³65 years) with large B-cell lymphoma treated with axi-cel at our institution. Methods We retrospectively analyzed and reviewed the data from patients treated with axi-cel at our institution. Patients had a diagnosis of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL), and transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL). Patients were treated with conditioning chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for 3 days followed by axi-cel infusion after 2 days of rest at a dose of 2 x 106 CAR+ T cells/kg body weight. Patients were monitored for toxicities for at least 7 days in the hospital after CAR T infusion and those who had at least 30 days of follow-up after axi-cel were considered to be evaluable for safety. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological toxicity termed as CAR-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES) were graded according to the CARTOX grading system (Neelapu et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018). Results A total of 61 patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received axi-cel at our institution were included. Of these, 44 (72%) patients were <65 years of age and 17 (28%) patients were ³65 years of age. The baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. ORR and CR rates at Day 30 were comparable between the two groups. CRS was common in both groups and was observed in 83% and 91% of the patients in the older and younger age groups, respectively. But most CRS events were grade 1-2. Grade 3 or higher CRS was observed in 18% vs. 11% in the older vs. younger age groups (P=0.67). One patient with a history of autoimmune disease in the elderly group died of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). CRES was observed in 58% and 71% of the patients in the older and younger age groups, respectively. Grade 3 or higher CRES was observed in 29% vs. 39% in the older vs. younger age groups (P=0.58). Median hospitalization period for axi-cel CAR T-cell therapy was comparable between the two groups. Conclusions Our results suggest that response rates are comparable between the elderly and younger age groups at day 30 after axi-cel therapy. Importantly, toxicities due to CRS and/or CRES after axi-cel CD19 CAR T cell therapy are comparable between the elderly (³65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Nastoupil: Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Juno: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therappeutics: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Fowler:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Samaniego:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wang:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Westin:Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apotex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals The Analysis of HIV-Associated Lymphoma in Japan

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5315-5315
Author(s):  
Shotaro Hagiwara ◽  
Kentaro Yoshinaga ◽  
Masayuki Shiseki ◽  
Junji Tanaka ◽  
Seiji Okada
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Burkitt Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background. The recent advance of antiretroviral therapy decreased the morbidity of opportunistic infections. However, the incidence of HIV-associated lymphoma remains high. Also, the outcome of the HIV-associated lymphoma is unclear in the era of rituximab. In order to address these clinical questions, we performed a nation-wide epidemiological study. Methods. Patients with HIV-associated lymphoma were extracted from the database of Japanese society of hematology blood disease registry from January 2012 to December 2015. We analyzed the patient's age, sex, subtypes of lymphoma, the international prognostic index (IPI) for diffuse large B cell lymphoma, and overall survival. Results. Eighty-one patients were extracted from the database. Eighty patients were available for the survival analysis. Seventy-six (93.8%) patients of them were male. The median age was 52.5(25-88) year-old. However, there were two peaks of age; the first peak was 38-40-year-old and the second was 59-62-year-old. Sub-types of lymphomas were diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)(48.1%), Burkitt lymphoma(19.8%), primary CNS lymphoma(8.6%), plasmablastic lymphoma(7.4%), peripheral T cell lymphoma(3.7%), Hodgkin's lymphoma(3.7%), primary effusion lymphoma(2.5%), MALT lymphoma(1.2%), Follicular lymphoma(1.2%) and Adult T cell lymphoma/leukemia(1.2%). Extra-nodal involvement at the diagnosis was observed in 61.7%. The involved sites were the brain, stomach, small bowel, colon, thyroid and the others. In DLBCL, the patients with IPI high and high-intermediate risk was 51.3%. The median observation period was 26 months. Estimated 3 years overall survival (OS) in all cases was 68.8+/-0.63%. Although there was no statistical significance, however, the 3 years, OS of Burkitt lymphoma tended to be better than that of DLBCL (84.6%+/-10.0 versus 67.7+/-8.8%). Log-rank analysis showed the OS in DLBCL patients with IPI high-intermediate and high risk was significantly worse than the patients with low, and low-intermediate risk (p<0.001). Estimated 3 years OS was 90+/-9.5% vs. 38.0+/-13.0%, respectively. The outcome of patients with primary CNS lymphoma remains poor, estimated 3 years OS was 45.7+/-22.4%. Conclusion. Our study showed diversity in the pathological subtype of HIV lymphoma. In the era of rituximab, the outcome seemed to be improved in patients with DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma. However, the survival remains short in patients with poor prognostic factors and primary CNS lymphoma. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Hagiwara: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shiseki:NOVARTIS Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Sqibb: Honoraria; Otsuka: Speakers Bureau. Tanaka:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Safety and Antitumor Activity Study Evaluating Loncastuximab Tesirine and Rituximab Versus Immunochemotherapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Yuliya Linhares ◽  
Mitul D Gandhi ◽  
Michael Chung ◽  
Jennifer Adeleye ◽  
David Ungar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Introduction: Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who fail immunochemotherapy (IC) and are unsuitable for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and those who relapse shortly after ASCT have extremely poor prognosis and need additional treatment options. Loncastuximab tesirine (Lonca) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer toxin. In a Phase 2 study (NCT03589469), Lonca demonstrated single-agent antitumor activity with manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL. Rituximab is a CD20-targeting monoclonal antibody used in front-line IC for DLBCL and in salvage regimens, such as rituximab/gemcitabine/oxaliplatin (R-GemOx). The addition of rituximab to a CD19-targeting pyrrolobenzodiazepine ADC appears to prolong tumor control in preclinical studies, providing the rationale for evaluating Lonca combined with rituximab (Lonca-R) as a treatment for R/R DLBCL. Study Design and Methods: This is a Phase 3, randomized, open-label, 2-part, 2-arm, multicenter study of Lonca-R versus standard IC in patients with R/R DLBCL (NCT04384484). Part 1 is a nonrandomized safety run-in with Lonca-R. The toxicity of Lonca-R will be compared with previous single-agent Lonca safety data after 20 patients have completed Cycle 1 in Part 1. Provided no significant increase in toxicity is observed, Part 2 will be initiated. Part 2 is a randomized study of Lonca-R versus R-GemOx (Figure 1). Key inclusion and exclusion criteria are reported in Table 1. The primary objective of Part 2 is to evaluate the efficacy of Lonca-R versus R-GemOx, using progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. PFS will be defined as the time between randomization and first documentation of recurrence, disease progression or death (central review) and the primary analysis will compare PFS between treatment arms using stratified log-rank testing. Secondary objectives include evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of the combination, in addition to the impact of treatment on symptoms, patient-reported outcomes and patients' overall health. In Part 1 and in the Lonca-R arm of Part 2, patients will receive intravenous (iv) Lonca at 150 µg/kg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles, then at 75 µg/kg on day 1 for up to 6 additional cycles. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 iv will be administered subsequent to Lonca infusion on day 1 of each cycle. Patients treated with Lonca-R will also be given dexamethasone 4 mg (oral, twice a day), where not contraindicated, on the day before, the day of, and the day after Lonca-R infusion. In the R-GemOx arm, patients will receive rituximab 375 mg/m2, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 iv on day 1 of each 14-day cycle up to a total of 8 cycles. Patients will receive premedication and supportive care according to the respective prescribing information for rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin. The trial is planned to open in Q3/Q4 2020, and target enrollment is 350 patients. Funding: This study is sponsored by ADC Therapeutics SA; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04384484. Disclosures Linhares: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics, Verastem Oncology, Bristol Myers-Squibb (Juno), AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida: Current Employment. Gandhi:TG Therapeutics (Advisory board), GlaxoSmithKline (Advisory board): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Adeleye:ADC Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ungar:ADC Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Hamadani:ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Janssen R&D; Incyte Corporation; ADC Therapeutics; Celgene Corporation; Pharmacyclics, Omeros, AbGenomics, Verastem, TeneoBio: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Rituximab is licensed for treatment of NHL but is being used in combination with an unlicensed drug (loncastuximab tesirine) in this study

scholarly journals Clinical Features, Treatments and Outcomes of HIV-Associated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Single-Center Experience

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 20-20
Author(s):  
Tylan Magnusson ◽  
Greer Burkholder ◽  
Nathan Erdmann ◽  
Amitkumar Mehta ◽  
Mayur Narkhede ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cd4 Count ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Extranodal Disease ◽  
Hiv Negative

INTRODUCTION Recent studies have suggested that the prognosis of HIV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (HIV-DLBCL) may be improving with advances in anti-retroviral therapies (ART). A pooled analysis of clinical trial data showed that EPOCH may be associated with superior outcomes as compared to CHOP (Barta et al. Blood. 2013), but about two-third of patients in the combined analysis were treated without rituximab. A recent French study, however, showed similar overall survival (OS) between R-CHOP and R-EPOCH treated patients (Besson et al. AIDS 2017) and a phase III trial showed similar efficacy of R-CHOP vs. R-EPOCH in HIV-uninfected DLBCL (Bartlett et al. JCO 2019). The optimum frontline therapy in HIV-DLBCL is unknown as most clinical trials exclude HIV-infected patients or restrict accrual to those with undetectable HIV viral load and minimum CD4 count cut-off. Moreover, most existing studies include a majority (&gt;60%) Caucasian population, and there is a paucity of studies on outcomes in African-American population. In this retrospective study, we describe the clinical features and outcomes of HIV-DLBCL patients seen at our institution and compare them with HIV negative DLBCL patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of HIV+ DLBCL cases diagnosed and treated at our institution from 2008-2020. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to assess overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess prognostic factors. HIV-DLBCL patients were matched 1:2 with HIV negative DLBCL by age and stage of lymphoma at diagnosis. Comparison of OS analysis was conducted using log-rank method and predictors of progression or death using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS We included a total of 33 patients with HIV-DLBCL in our study. Median age was 46.6 years (IQR 40-53.3), 25 (76%) were males, and 20 (61%) were African-Americans (Table). 28 (85%) patients had stage III/IV and 24 (73%) had extranodal disease at diagnosis. The median CD4 count at diagnosis was 252 (IQR 89.5-409). 6 (18%) had CNS involvement at diagnosis, for which the median OS was 8.3 months. First-line treatment included rituximab-chemotherapy combinations in 25 (76%) patients. All patients continued ART during first line treatment. Median follow up duration of the entire cohort was 2.06 years (IQR 0.53-5.02 years) and 5 (15.2%) were lost to follow up. The 2-year OS for R-CHOP treated patients was 63% vs. 38% for R-EPOCH treated patients, although this failed to reach statistical significance (p=0.125). On multivariate analysis, the only factor significantly associated with difference in event free survival (EFS; progression or death) was female sex (HR 19.86; [2.652-148.7]; p=0.004). Trends were seen towards shorter EFS among patients who were tobacco smokers at time of DLBCL diagnosis (HR 2.69; 0.463-15.6]; p=0.271), CD4+ count &lt;200 at time of DLBCL diagnosis (HR 2.39; [0.519-11.0]; p=0.264), IPI score &gt;3 (HR 2.98; [0.480-18.5]; p=0.241), and presence of MYC gene rearrangement (HR 3.93; [0.569-27.2]; p=0.165). Treatment type (R-CHOP, R-EPOCH), ART use prior to lymphoma diagnosis, race, and insurance status were not correlated with EFS. 11 (33.3%) patients died within 1 year of diagnosis. The 2-year OS for the entire cohort was 64% vs. 68% in matched HIV-negative DLBCL patients (p=0.651). Median OS for HIV+ patients was 2.14 years (IQR 0.23-5.77) vs 2.97 years (IQR 0.76-6.48) in matched HIV-negative DLBCL patients (p=0.3996). One patient died from acute hypoxemic respiratory failure prior to starting treatment. Four patients died of complications during their first inpatient chemotherapy administration. CONCLUSION In our cohort, most HIV-DLBCL patients were African-Americans, presented with advanced stage and extranodal disease. The survival of HIV-associated DLBCL was similar to HIV-negative counterparts. All HIV-DLBCL continued ART during chemotherapy, suggesting the feasibility of this approach. There was no difference in OS between patients treated with R-CHOP vs. R-EPOCH, however there was a trend towards increased OS in patients treated with R-CHOP. CNS involvement at diagnosis was frequently seen. Despite limited sample size, we observed a significant association with gender, and a trend toward significant factors including tobacco use and low CD4 count at time of diagnosis. Disclosures Mehta: TG Therapeutics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Merck:Research Funding;Roche-Genentech:Research Funding;Kite/Gilead:Research Funding;Innate Pharmaceuticals:Research Funding;Seattle Genetics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Oncotartis:Research Funding;Gelgene/BMS:Research Funding;Juno Parmaceuticals/BMS:Research Funding;fortyseven Inc/Gilead:Research Funding;Takeda:Research Funding;Incyte:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Affimed:Research Funding.

Phase 1b/2a Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Dose-Escalation Study To Evaluate The Safety and Tolerability Of Intravenous Infusion Of SNS01-T In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Or Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1950-1950 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A Lust ◽  
Charles Barranco ◽  
Saad Z Usmani ◽  
Frits van Rhee ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Pro Inflammatory Cytokines

Abstract Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A) has been implicated in the regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammation, and is the only known protein to be modified by hypusination. Hypusinated eIF5A, the predominant form of eIF5A in cancer cells, is involved in cell survival and activation of inflammatory pathways. In contrast, accumulation of the unhypusinated form of eIF5A is associated with apoptosis and mutants of eIF5A that cannot be hypusinated (e.g. eIF5AK50R) are pro-apoptotic. SNS01-T was designed to treat B-cell cancers and consists of two active components: a plasmid DNA expressing the pro-apoptotic eIF5AK50R under the control of a B cell-specific promoter, and an siRNA against an untranslated region of native eIF5A mRNA. When these two components are combined with linear polyethyleneimine (PEI), the nucleic acids are condensed into nanoparticles for protection from degradation in the blood and enhanced cellular delivery. The mode of action of SNS01-T is siRNA-mediated inhibition of hypusinated eIF5A and simultaneous over-expression of pro-apoptotic eIF5AK50R to induce cell death. In vitro cell studies and in vivo xenograft studies have demonstrated the efficacy of this approach. The safety and tolerability of intravenous administration of SNS01-T is being investigated in a first-in-human Phase1b/2a study in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Eligible patients are being enrolled sequentially into four cohorts at increasing doses. Each patient receives an intravenous infusion of SNS01-T twice weekly for 6 consecutive weeks. Eligible patients must have been diagnosed with MM according to IMWG criteria, or with MCL or DLBCL with histologic confirmation. Patients also must have measurable disease, have relapsed or refractory disease after two or more prior treatment regimens, have a life expectancy of at least 3 months, and not be eligible to receive any other standard therapy known to extend life expectancy. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple escalating doses of SNS01-T. Secondary objectives include analysis of pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and therapeutic efficacy. The required 3 patients per cohort have completed the dosing schedule in cohorts 1 and 2 from a total of 10 patients enrolled (9 patients with MM and 1 with DLBCL). Of the ten patients enrolled, four completed the full treatment period, two did not complete dosing but were evaluable for safety, and four (three in cohort 1 and one in cohort 2) discontinued treatment after fewer than 8 doses and were not evaluable. There were no drug-related serious adverse events or dose limiting toxicities in either cohort 1 or 2. In cohort 1 (0.0125 mg/kg SNS01-T), two of three evaluable patients did not progress on treatment and were considered stable at week 3 and week 6, the end of the dosing regimen. The third patient progressed after receiving 10 of the 12 doses and was evaluable for safety. In cohort 2 (0.05 mg/kg), 3 patients (2 with MM and 1 with DLBCL) were evaluable for safety. Stabilization of serum monoclonal protein levels was observed in one MM patient of cohort 2. Two patients (1 with MM and 1 with DLBCL) progressed after receiving 8 of the 12 doses and were evaluable for safety. Results from ongoing pharmacokinetic studies, immunogenicity studies, and quantification of pro-inflammatory cytokines will be discussed. The planned dose levels for the third and fourth groups are 0.2 and 0.375 mg/kg, respectively. The results to date of this first-in-human clinical trial indicate that SNS01-T can be administered safely and the MTD has not yet been reached (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01435720). Disclosures: Barranco: Senesco Technologies: Consultancy. Usmani:Celgene, Onyx, Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. van Rhee:Jansen&Jansen: Research Funding. Thompson:Senesco Technologies: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Taylor:Senesco Technologies: stock options Other. Dondero:Senesco Technologies: Employment. Browne:Senesco Technologies Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene, Millenium, Onyx (same for all): Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

High Risk Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Comparison of Aggressive Subtypes Treated with Dose Adjusted Chemotherapy-the University of Texas MD Anderson Experience

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 106-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishwanath Sathyanarayanan ◽  
Yasuhiro Oki ◽  
Amir K Issa ◽  
Mohamed Amin Ahmed ◽  
Mansoor Noorani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Md Anderson

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).Nearly 50% of high-risk DLBCL patients are not cured with standard rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (RCHOP). High risk DLBCL may be defined as double hit lymphoma (DHL, translocation of MYC and BCL2 or BCL6), double expressor lymphoma (DEL, over expression of MYC and BCL2), high risk international prognostic index (IPI) of 3-5, high Ki-67, and non-germinal center subtype (non-GCB). The majority of DHL cases occur in the GCB subtype, as opposed to the majority of DEL cases which occur in non-GCB. Hence we sought to compare different high risk subsets treated with dose-adjusted etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab (DA) EPOCH-R. In single arm phase II clinical trials, dose adjusted (DA) EPOCH-R has shown promising results, with potential greater efficacy in the GCB subtype in subset analyses (Wilson et al, Hematologica 2012). A randomized phase III study comparing RCHOP with (DA) EPOCH-R in newly diagnosed DLBCL has completed accrual, with highly anticipated results due in late 2016. Methods: We conducted a retrospective reviewof all consecutive, newly diagnosed DLBCL patients treated with (DA) EPOCH-R at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2010 to 2014. Eligible patients were 18 years or greater, had high-risk DLBCL as determined by the treating physician, and had available data of treatment and response. The cell of origin subtype was determined by immunohistochemistry using Hans algorithm, and MYC and BCL2 positivity were defined as BCL2 positive in at least 70% and MYC positive in at least 40% of cells. DHL was defined as rearrangement of MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 by fluorescent in situ hybridization. The objectives were to analyze demographic, prognostic, and treatment variables in comparison with clinical response and survival outcomes in three sub groups which included 1. DHL (GCB) 2. DLBCL without MYC and BCL2 expression (GCB), and 3. DEL (GCB and non GCB). Complete response (CR), overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated using standard methods. Statistical analysis was done using Fishers exact test or Chi-square test / Kruskal-Wallis test. Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analysis including overall survival and progression free survival. The Log-rank test was used to evaluate the difference in time-to-event endpoints between patient groups. Results: We identified 233 high risk DLBCL patients treated with (DA) EPOCH-R. After filtering the data to identify patients which were included in our three groups, we identified 22 patients with DHL (GCB), 46 patients with non DEL (GCB), and 16 with DEL. The demographic features and outcomes are mentioned in the table 1 below. The DHL group had more frequent bone marrow (BM) involvement, and the DHL and DEL groups were more frequently age >60 years and high IPI in comparison to the non DEL GCB group. The CR rate, OS and PFS at 1 year were not significantly different between these three groups. Figure 1 highlights the OS (A) and PFS (B) results of each group. Conclusions: (DA) EPOCH-R is highly effective in patients with subsets of patients with high-risk DLBCL and may be able to overcome prognostic factors which have been shown to be adverse with RCHOP therapy. The results of this retrospective study suggest that OS in DHL, DEL and non DEL (GCB) are not statistically different. Hence, intensive chemotherapy with (DA) EPOCH-R could be considered as a frontline treatment option for patients with high risk DLBCL, pending further confirmation in randomized trials. Disclosures Oki: Novartis: Research Funding. Fowler:Infinity: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Wang:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Asana BioSciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Fayad:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Westin:ProNAi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Ibrutinib for Transformed Lymphoma; A Report of 4 Patients

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5115-5115
Author(s):  
Amy Sharma ◽  
Sadia Riaz ◽  
Jonathan E. Kolitz ◽  
Jacqueline C. Barrientos ◽  
Steven L Allen
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Introduction Large cell lymphoma transformed from an indolent lymphoproliferative disorder typically carries a worse prognosis than de novo diffuse large B cell lymphoma. When transformation to large cell lymphoma occurs in CLL (Richter's syndrome), traditional anthracycline or platinum based therapy is associated with a median survival of <12 months. Better, more targeted therapies are needed. We describe 4 patients with transformation to large cell lymphoma who responded to ibrutinib. Cases: Patient A, age 68 at transformation, was a 64 year old male at diagnosis with CLL Rai stage 1. He was initially asymptomatic with a performance status of 0. 4 years later he developed dyspnea on exertion after one block and was found to have a left pleural effusion with diffuse lymphadenopathy with increased PET avidity. Biopsy of a supraclavicular node was positive for extracavitary primary effusion lymphoma, HHV8+, CD5-, CD10-. Patient was given R-CHOP x 6 cycles; he relapsed after 18 months and was given ibrutinib 560mg daily with monthly rituximab x 6 and achieved a PR with reversion to CLL. He is currently continuing ibrutinib in this remission for 10+ months. Patient B, age 90 at transformation, was a 68 year old female at diagnosis of CLL, Rai stage 0. She developed stage III CLL 18 years after diagnosis, was treated with BR x 6 cycles. 2 years later she developed Richter's transformation which was CD10+. Although she achieved a PR after 4 months of ibrutinib 560mg with monthly rituximab, her PS was 4 and she was transferred to hospice and expired 4.5 months after initiating ibrutinib/rituximab. Patient C, age 87 at relapse, was a 73 year old male at diagnosis when he originally presented with stage 1 DLBCL transformed from marginal zone lymphoma. He had 3 cycles of R-CHOP and RT to involved area and was disease free for 14 years until he had worsening thrombocytopenia. This was monitored for 3 years until age 87 when CT/PET showed increasing SUV in multiple lymph nodes and the spleen. Biopsy showed diffuse large B cell lymphoma, CD10-. He was started on ibrutinib 560mg with monthly rituximab x 6. He achieved a CR by CT/PET except for persistent splenic disease. He underwent splenectomy and continues in CR on ibrutinib at 9+ months. Patient D is an 83 year old female with large cell transformation from marginal zone lymphoma at diagnosis. She had stage IV disease with large cells involving pleural fluid and bone marrow. She was CD10-. She received R-CHOP x 3 with progressive disease. At that time ibrutinib 560mg alone was initiated. She has a CR based on recent CT/PET findings and is continuing ibrutinib at 18+ months. Conclusion: All of the above patients responded to ibrutinib given with or without rituximab with symptomatic and objective remissions; all of the CD10 negative cases are alive and still responding 9-18 months after initiating therapy. Studies examining the efficacy of ibrutinib in diffuse large B cell lymphoma are underway. This report supports the need for further study of ibrutinib in the transformed setting, particularly in the elderly where patients may not be appropriate for aggressive therapies. Disclosures Off Label Use: Ibrutinib was used to treat transformed large cell lymphoma.. Kolitz:Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barrientos:Gilead: Research Funding; NIH/NCATS: Research Funding; ASH-AMFDP: Research Funding. Allen:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Equity Ownership; Onconova: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals PD-1 Blockade for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 706-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Bin Chen ◽  
Philippe Armand ◽  
Robert A. Redd ◽  
Jad Bsat ◽  
Reid W Merryman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Disease Relapse ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background: The leading cause of death after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed / refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains disease relapse. Except for specific subsets, DLBCL appears to have relatively low susceptibility to single-agent PD-1 blockade. However, administering PD-1 blockade early after ASCT could leverage the remodeling immune landscape and minimal residual disease state to increase the therapeutic effect of PD-1 blockade and decrease the relapse rate after ASCT. A prior study with pidilizumab showed encouraging results in this setting (Armand et al. JCO 2013;31:4199-206), but the specificity of that antibody is still under investigation. We therefore conducted a phase 2 multi-center single-arm study of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients with chemosensitive DLBCL after ASCT. Another arm of this study enrolled pts with R/R classical Hodgkin lymphoma and will be presented separately. Methods: Patients ≥ 18y with R/R DLBCL who had received no more than 3 lines of prior therapy and had undergone ASCT with chemosensitive disease were enrolled on this study. In addition to meeting standard eligibility criteria for pembro treatment, pts had to have recovered from ASCT toxicities and had to begin study treatment within 60 days of stem cell infusion, with a goal of starting treatment within 21 days of hospital discharge. All patients received pembro 200mg IV every 3 weeks for 8 cycles. PET-CT scans were obtained at post-ASCT baseline, after 3 and 7 cycles, then at 12 and 18 months post-ASCT. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival rate (PFS) at 18 months after ASCT, assessed using the International Harmonization Project 2007 criteria, with the approach considered promising if 22 patients were alive and in remission at 18 months. Results: 31 pts were enrolled and 2 withdrew consent before starting treatment. Among the 29 eligible pts, median age was 57 (22-76). Prior to ASCT, 18 (62%) were in CR and 11 (38%) were in PR. At study baseline (post-ASCT), 25 (86%) were in CR. 18 pts (62%) completed all 8 cycles of pembro per protocol. 11 pts (38%) stopped pembro early for pt choice (n=1, after febrile neutropenia), toxicity (n=6, including 3 pts with gr3 pneumonitis, 1 with g3 hepatitis, 1 with gr4 aplastic anemia) or progressive disease (n=4). 23 pts (79%) experienced a total of 57 gr3 or higher adverse events (AEs). The most common gr4 AE was neutropenia (n=6, 21%). Concerning related AEs, 9 pts (31%) experienced 14 gr3-4 AEs at least probably related to pembro including neutropenia (4 gr3, 1 gr 4) and pneumonitis (2 gr3). 10 pts (34%) experienced at least one immune-related AE of gr2 or higher severity including pneumonitis (n=1 gr2, n=2 gr3), transaminitis (n=1 gr2, n=1 gr3) and rash (n=1 gr2, n=1 gr3). There were no treatment-related deaths. Among the 29 eligible pts, 1 patient withdrew consent after cycle 1 and 1 pt was lost to follow-up after the 12m assessment (in CR). 27 pts (93%) were evaluable for the primary endpoint. 10 patients (34%, 95% CI: 18-54%) experienced disease relapse at a median of 5 months (3-18) after ASCT, and all other evaluable patients (n=17, 59%, 95% CI: 39-76%) were in CR at the 18m timepoint. 2 pts have died, both of whom had relapse at 3m after ASCT. Correlative studies including immune reconstitution and MRD analyses are ongoing. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab administered after ASCT in patients with R/R DLBCL is feasible with toxicity similar to its use in the R/R setting for other hematological malignancies. The high rate of neutropenia on this study, which is not a common AE of pembro in other settings, may be related to the burden of prior therapy or possibly to an accentuated toxicity of pembro in this specific patient population. The 18-month progression-free rate did not meet the protocol-specified primary objective, and therefore does not support a larger confirmatory study. Future studies in this setting should likely focus on specific subsets of DLBCL, e.g. primary mediastinal BCL, EBV+ DLBCL, T cell histiocyte rich LCL, which may be especially sensitive to PD1 blockade. Disclosures Chen: REGiMMUNE: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Armand:Pfizer: Consultancy; Adaptive: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tensha: Research Funding. Herrera:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; KiTE Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Merck, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding. LaCasce:Humanigen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Data safety and monitoring board; Research to Practice: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jacobson:Pfizer: Consultancy; Precision Bioscience: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Humanigen: Consultancy. Jacobsen:Merck: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Rodig:Merck & Co., Inc.: Research Funding; Affimed Inc.: Research Funding; KITE Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers-Squibb: Research Funding. Shipp:AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document