scholarly journals Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide-Based Haploidentical Vs Matched Unrelated Donor Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using Myeloablative Targeted Busulfan-Based Conditioning for Pediatric Acute Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2874-2874
Author(s):  
Kyung Taek Hong ◽  
Hyun Jin Park ◽  
Bo Kyung Kim ◽  
Hong Yul An ◽  
Jung Yoon Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Matched Unrelated Donor ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Haploidentical related donor (HRD) is a common alternative donor strategy used when matched sibling or unrelated donors are not available for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis is an attractive option when performing a HRD HSCT because of its promising outcomes and easy application. However, there have been no studies comparing HRD HSCT with PTCy and MUD HSCT with antithymocyte globulin, using similar busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimen in pediatric acute leukemia. Herein, we compared the outcomes in children and adolescents with acute leukemia after HRD HSCT with PTCy (n=35) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT (n=45) after targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning using intensive pharmacokinetic monitoring. The median follow-up times of the HRD and MUD groups were 3.7 and 4.6 years. No engraftment failure was observed. The cumulative incidence of GVHD grades II-IV (34.3% versus 48.9%, p=0.142), grades III-IV (2.9% vs. 8.9%, p=0.272), extensive chronic GVHD (11.4% vs. 18.3%, p=0.417), relapse (25.6% vs. 28.0%, p=0.832), and non-relapse mortality (0% vs. 2.2%, p=0.420) were not significantly different. The 3-year severe chronic GVHD-free/relapse-free, leukemia-free and overall survival rates in the HRD and MUD groups were 62.9±8.7% versus 49.8±7.6% (p=0.318), 74.4±8.0% versus 67.5±7.2% (p=0.585), and 88.6±5.4% versus 83.7±5.7% (p=0.968), respectively. In subgroup analyses of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the groups. Our results demonstrated that HRD HSCT with PTCy using a targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning shows outcomes similar to those of MUD HSCT. HRD HSCT with PTCy could be considered for pediatric acute leukemia patients who lack an HLA-matched donor. Disclosures Kang: Cartexell: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Korea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen Korea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Low-Dose Anti-Thymocyte Globulin for Graft-Versus-Host-Disease Prophylaxis in Matched Unrelated Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5782-5782
Author(s):  
Adam Bryant ◽  
Ranjeeta Mallick ◽  
Lothar B. Huebsch ◽  
David S. Allan ◽  
Harold Atkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Related Donor

Abstract Background Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Prophylactic in-vivo T-Cell depletion with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) has recently been reported as leading to decreased GVHD rates in matched unrelated and related donor HSCT, without increases in relapse or death. Understanding that higher rates of GVHD are observed with matched unrelated versus matched related donor HSCT, we have always had a local policy to give ATG as part of GVHD prophylaxis in patients undergoing HSCT from an unrelated donor. Here we report and compare clinical outcomes of patients who did and did not receive ATG at our transplant center using a unique, substantially lower ATG dose than previously reported. Methods We conducted a retrospective single-center database study comparing outcomes in 110 matched unrelated donor (MUD; ATG-exposed) and 78 matched related donor (MRD; ATG-unexposed) HSCT patients transplanted for any malignant indication at The Ottawa Hospital from 2009 to 2014. Patients were exposed to a rabbit ATG formulation (Thymoglobulin ®) at 0.5 mg/kg on day -2 and 2.0 mg/kg on day -1 prior to stem cell infusion, to total 2.5 mg/kg. Primary outcomes assessed were incidence of acute and chronic GVHD, defined as new-onset GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy at less or more than 100 days post HSCT, respectively. Secondary outcomes included disease relapse and survival. Results At baseline there were no significant differences in median age at transplant, sex, disease indication or risk index, graft source, conditioning regimen and intensity between ATG exposed (MUD) and unexposed (MRD) cohorts. The majority of patients in both cohorts had intermediate or high disease risk index. There were significant baseline differences between the ATG exposed and unexposed cohorts with respect to proportion of 7/8 mismatched unrelated donor transplants (14 v 6% respectively, p = 0.015) and median CD34+ dose (4.9 v 7.6 x 108 cells; p < 0.001). No differences were noted in platelet engraftment. ATG exposed patients had significantly shorter time to neutrophil engraftment than the unexposed cohort (16 v 19 days respectively; p=0.007). ATG exposed patients had significantly lower rates of GVHD compared to the unexposed cohort (57 v 79%; p=0.005), with differences noted predominantly in rates of chronic GVHD (18 v 44%, p= 0.009). The proportion of patients off immune suppression one year after HSCT was not significantly different between the cohorts.At median follow-up of 13 (1-73) months for the ATG exposed cohort and 20 (0-69) months for the ATG unexposed cohort, no significant differences in overall survival (median overall survival not met for either cohort), cumulative incidence of relapse (26 v 29%; p=0.73) or relapse-free survival (not met in ATG exposed; 26.2 months in ATG unexposed, p=0.22) were observed between groups (Figure 1). Significant differences were observed with respect to GVHD-Free Relapse-Free Survival (GRFS) between ATG exposed and unexposed cohorts, with a two-year GRFS of 23 v 3% respectively (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences between cohorts in proportion of patients with post HSCT infectious episodes or ICU admissions. Conclusions Here we report significantly lower rates of chronic GVHD and significant improvement in GVHD-free relapse-free survival in our ATG exposed MUD HSCT cohort compared to our ATG unexposed MRD. These findings were observed without differences in relapse or survival outcomes, infectious complications or ICU admissions. While in keeping with other recent reports on ATG use for GVHD prophylaxis, our findings indicate that a lower dose of ATG may be effective in preventing GVHD. Our study suggests that a broader exploration into the optimal dosing of this prophylactic GVHD agent is warranted. Disclosures Bence-Bruckler: Lundbeck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sabloff:Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lundbeck: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Comparision of Outcomes According to HLA Disparity in Acute Leukemia Patients: A Single Center Institution Experience

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5776-5776
Author(s):  
Pervin Topcuoglu ◽  
Guldane Cengiz Seval ◽  
Sinem Civriz Bozdag ◽  
Selami Kocak Toprak ◽  
Meltem Kurt Yuksel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Matched Sibling ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Introduction:Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) still remains the only established curative approach for the treatment of acute leukemia (AL). HLA-matched sibling or relative donor (MRD) is considered the optimal donor source but when this is not available, a matched unrelated donor (MUD) is considered the best alternative. Prior studies reported comparable results of Allo-HSCT from MSD versus MUD. In this retrospective, single center review, we aimed to compare the transplantation outcomes after 10/10 or 9/10 HLA-matched related to unrelated donor transplantation in adults with AL. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 363 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of AL who underwent their first Allo-HSCT between January 2005 and April 2018, using matched 10/10 MRD (n= 244) and MUD (n=54) or mismatched-UD (mmUD) (n=65) at Ankara University School of Medicine, Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit. Patients transplanted using cord blood or haploidentical donors were excluded to homogenously compare adult full-matched sibling or unrelated donors in the acute leukemia setting. Parameters evaluated included hematopoietic engraftment, disease relapse, transplant related complications, mortality, overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) from transplantation, and the incidence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD. Results:Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age was similar in all groups at the time of transplantation (p= 0.9). Median follow-up from the transplantation for all patients was 25 months (range, 1- 152.8) but median follow up was longer in the MRD group (33.6 months [range, 1-152.8]) than in the MUD and (13.3 months [range, 1-121.5]and mmUD groups (22.3 months [range, 2.3-129.4]and p=0.011). In the MRD group, 90.9% received a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen, while in the MUD and mmUD groups, 73.1% and 81.3% received a MAC regimen (p=0,001). Cyclosporine and methotrexate were used as the main graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in all groups. The proportion of patients who received in vivo T cell depletion significantly differed among the two groups (6.6% in the MRD group, 92.6% in the MUD group and 50.8% in the mmUD group, p=0.000). Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) was the main stem cell source in all groups (92.2% in the MRD group vs. 90.7% in the MUD group vs. 95.4% mmUD, p<0.1). Most of the patients (94.3%) achieved hematopoietic engraftment, graft failure occurred in 4.5%, 7.4% and 9.2% in MRD, MUD and mmUD groups, respectively (p>0.1). The median time for neutrophil and platelet engraftments was seen faster in MRD group compared to MUD and mmUD (p<0.0001).According to the type of donor the incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD were similar among MRD, MUD and mmUD (22.1%, 24.1% and 18.5%, respectively). But lower incidence of chronic GVHD was observed post-HSCT with a mmUD than a MSD; 22.2% for MUD, 32.3% for mmUD and 55.6% for MRD (p>0.1). No statistical significance was observed for transplant related mortality (TRM) in terms of the type of donor (MUD group. mmUD groupand MRD group; 22.2%, 23.1% and 18.0%, p=0.572). Relapse incidence was similar among the groups (MRD vs. MUD vs. mmUD; 33.6% vs. 29.8% vs. 30.8%, p=0.807). Two-year leukemia free- and overall survival were not affected the donor types (Figure-1).. Conclusion:Our results suggest that, when an HLA-identical sibling donor is not available for an adult with AL who is otherwise a candidate for Allo-HSCT, a 10/10 or 9/10 UD may be used with the expectation of similar rates of TRM, LFS and OS at 2 years. Disclosures Civriz Bozdag: NOVARTIS: Consultancy; MSD: Research Funding; TAKEDA: Consultancy. Özcan:Jazz: Other: Travel support; BMS: Honoraria; MSD: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Travel payment; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel payment, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Archigen: Research Funding; MSD: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Jazz: Other. Ilhan:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Beksac:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen,Janssen-Cilag,Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Fludarabine and Melphalan Compared with Reduced Doses of Busulfan and Flurabine Improves Transplant Outcomes in Older MDS Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 253-253
Author(s):  
Betul Oran ◽  
Kwang Woo Ahn ◽  
Caitrin Fretham ◽  
Mithun Vinod Shah ◽  
Ryotaro Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Dose ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only potentially curative therapy in eligible patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens that have been developed to extend HSCT to older patients resulted in encouraging outcomes. However, several retrospective studies have raised concerns about disease control when RIC is used in MDS and the ideal conditioning regimen has not yet been found. In this study, we aimed to compare two most commonly used RIC regimens; intravenous use of fludarabine with busulfan (FluBu) and fludarabine with melphalan (FluMel). Study population: Through the CIBMTR, after excluding patients with ex-vivo T cell depletion, we identified 1045 MDS patients aged ≥ 60 years and underwent first HSCT with matched related or matched (8/8) unrelated donor (MRD and MUD) using RIC between 2007-2016. RIC was defined via CIBMTR criteria as a regimen that incorporated an IV busulfan (BU) total dose ≤ 7.2 mg/kg or low-dose melphalan (MEL) total dose ≤ 150 mg/m2. By that, we identified 697 MDS patients who received FluBu (BU 6.4 mg/kg: 87%, BU 3.2 mg/kg: 13%) and 448 receiving FluMel (MEL 140 mg/m2: 80%, MEL 100 mg/m2: 20%). Results: The two groups, FluBu and FluMel, were comparable for disease and transplant related characteristics except the more frequent use of ATG or Campath in FluBu group (39% vs. 31%). The median age was 67 in both groups, and 26% and 19% of FluBu and FluMel groups were aged ³70, respectively. Hematopoietic comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was ³3 in 61% and 59% of FluBu and FluMel groups and MDS risk score by CIBMTR at HCT was high/very high in 34% in both groups. FluMel was associated with a reduced relapse incidence (RI) after HSCT compared with FluBu as presented in Table 1 and Table 2. Adjusted RI at 1-year was 43% with FluBu and 25% with FluMel (p=&lt;0.0001). On the other hand, transplant related mortality (TRM) was higher with FluMel compared with FluBu (27% vs. 15%, p=&lt;0.0001). The difference persisted at 2- and 3-years after HSCT as presented in the figure. Since the magnitude of improvement in RI was greater with FluMel than the improvement in TRM with FluBu, disease-free survival (DFS) was improved at 1-year and beyond with FluMel compared with FluBu (48% vs. 41% at 1-year, p=0.030, and 38% vs 28% at 3-years, p=0.0030). These outcome differences remained significant when sensitivity analyses were performed excluding patients who received RIC with either BU 3.2 mg/kg or Mel 100 mg/m2. FluMel, did not lead to higher incidence of severe grade 3-4 aGvHD (HR=1.2, 95%CI, 0.9-1.6, p=0.3) or chronic GvHD (HR=0.9, 95%CI=0.7-1.06, p=0.2). However, grade 2-4 aGVHD was observed more often with FluMel than FluBu (HR=1.3, 95%CI, 1.1-1.6, p=0.006). This led to inferior outcomes of GRFS within the first 2 months with FluMel (HR=1.9, HR=1.4-2.6, p&lt;0.001) but superior outcomes of GRFS beyond 2 months with FluMel compared with FluBu (HR=0.7, 95%CI=0.6-0.8, p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggest that between the two most commonly used RIC regimens in older MDS patients, FluMel was associated with superior DFS and overall survival compared with FluBu due to reduced RI despite higher TRM. Disclosures Oran: AROG pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astex pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nakamura:Kirin Kyowa: Other: support for an academic seminar in a university in Japan; Alexion: Other: support to a lecture at a Japan Society of Transfusion/Cellular Therapy meeting ; Celgene: Other: support for an academic seminar in a university in Japan; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scott:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Speakers Bureau. Popat:Jazz: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adults with Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD): A Study of the Inborn Errors Working Party (IEWP) of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 970-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Chiesa ◽  
Junfeng Wang ◽  
Henric-Jan Blok ◽  
Benedicte Neven ◽  
Despina Moshous ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Stem Cell Source ◽  
Engraftment Failure

Abstract Introduction: Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a rare primary immunodeficiency disease characterized by impairment of the phagocyte NADPH-oxidase complex, resulting in deficient microbial killing and life-threatening bacterial and fungal infections. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative approach, but it can be complicated by graft failure, graft versus-host disease (GvHD) and transplant-related mortality (TRM). In order to define prognostic risk factors in this setting, the IEWP of the EBMT performed a large retrospective registry study on 600 pediatric and adult patients with CGD undergoing allo-HSCT. Patients and Methods: We analyzed the outcome of patients with CGD who received allo-HSCT in EBMT centers between 1993 and 2017. The main end-points of the study were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS; events were death and primary or secondary engraftment failure) according to patient's age, donor type, stem cell source and conditioning regimen. One patient died before allo-HSCT and was excluded from analysis. Results: We studied 536 children (aged < 18 years) and 63 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) affected by CGD. The median follow-up was 45.37 months (IQR 15.8-81.8). Genetic results were available for 307 patients: inheritance was X-linked (75%) or autosomal recessive (25%). Median age at transplant was 7.2 years (range: 0.12-48.56). Conditioning regimen was Busulfan/Fludarabine (n=244; 41%), Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (n=104; 17%), Treosulfan/Fludarabine (n=76; 13%), Treosulfan/Fludarabine/Thiotepa (n=52; 9%) or other drug combinations (n=123; 20%). Donors were human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched related (MFD, 10/10; n=211, 40%), matched unrelated (MUD, 10/10 or 6/6 in UCB; n=201; 38%), mismatched related (MMFD, ≥ 9/10; n= 27; 5%) or mismatched unrelated (MMUD, ≥ 9/10 or 5/6 in UCB; n= 83; 16%). Stem cell source was bone marrow (BM; n=408; 69%), peripheral blood (PB; n=153; 26%) or umbilical cord blood (UCB; n=27; 5%). Donor engraftment occurred in 516 evaluable patients (88%), while primary or secondary engraftment failure occurred in 68 patients (12%). Seventy-nine patients (13%) died after allo-HSCT. The 2 year Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS and EFS were 87.1% (95% CI, 84.2-89.9) and 77.8% (95% CI, 74.2-81.4), respectively (Fig A). The 2-year cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD, chronic GvHD and extensive chronic GvHD was 18.6% (95%, 15.1-22.2), 16.2 % (95%, 18.8-19.7) and 5.5% (95%, 3.4-7.7), respectively. A univariate cox model with spline term demonstrated that older age at transplant was associated with an increased risk of death (p=0.002). Children undergoing allo-HSCT had a superior 2y OS (88.1%; 95% CI 85.2-91.0), compared to adults (78.2%; 95% CI, 67.7-88.7), p=0.03 (Fig B). Patients undergoing allo-HSCT from a MFD had a superior EFS (86.5%; 95% CI 81.5-91.4) compared to MUD (73.3%; 95% CI 66.7-79.9), MMUD (78.2%; 95% CI 69-87.5) and MMFD (59.7; 95% CI 40.4-79.1), p< 0.001 (Fig C). Patients receiving BM grafts had superior 2y EFS (81.0%; 95% CI 76.9-85.1) compared to PB (72.5%; 95% CI 64.7-80.4) and UCB (66.7%; 95% CI 48.9-84.4), p=0.04. The pattern of disease inheritance and the choice of conditioning regimen didn't have an impact on outcome (Fig D). Fifty-three patients with graft failure underwent a second allo-HSCT and the 2y OS in this group was 82.1% (95% CI, 71.5-92.7). Year of transplantation didn't have an influence on outcome. Conclusion: This is the largest study describing the outcome of allo-HSCT in children and adults affected by CGD. We demonstrate an excellent outcome, with a low incidence of graft failure, TRM and GvHD. Older patients with CGD have reduced survival after allo-HSCT, indicating that transplant should be considered at a younger age. The use of a MMFD is associated with poorer outcome; indication to transplant in this setting should be carefully evaluated by the treating physicians. Disclosures Chiesa: Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Kalwak:medac: Other: travel grants; Sanofi: Other: travel grants. Sykora:Aventis-Behring: Research Funding; medac: Research Funding. Locatelli:Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Honoraria; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wynn:Orchard SAB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orchard Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Chimerix: Research Funding; Genzyme: Honoraria; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Orchard Therapeutics: Consultancy; Chimerix: Consultancy. Zecca:Chimerix: Honoraria. Veys:Pfizer: Honoraria; Servier: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Slatter:Medac: Other: Travel assistance.

scholarly journals Haplo-Cord Transplantation Vs Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with AML/MDS Older Than 50

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1235-1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Rhodes ◽  
Koen van Besien ◽  
Hongtao Liu ◽  
Usama Gergis ◽  
Stephanie B. Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract Haplo-cord Transplantation Vs Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplantation In Patients with AML/MDS older than 50 Between 2007 and 2013, 109 patients with AML/MDS who were 50 years and older and had no HLA- matched related donor underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. 64 had an HLA identical unrelated donor and received fludarabine/melphalan/alemtuzumab conditioning and post transplant tacrolimus for graft vs host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. 45 underwent haplo-cord (HC) SCT with fludarabine/melphalan/ thymoglobulin; post-transplant tacrolimus and MMF. We compared patient characteristics and transplant outcomes between both groups. (Table 1) Age distribution and ASBMT risk category were similar. There were more patient's with AML in the HC group. (P=0.01) Time to neutrophil recovery, treatment related mortality (TRM), relapse rate, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were nearly identical between the two groups. Time to platelet recovery was on average 5 days longer after HC (p=0.05) The incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were very low in both groups, in part due to the use of in-vivo T cell depletion. HC transplant with reduced intensity conditioning is a curative treatment for older patients with AML/MDS who lack HLA identical unrelated donors. Despite inclusion of many patients with high risk features, nearly two thirds were estimated to be alive one year after transplant and very few had chronic GVHD. Haplo-cord grafts are more readily available, a potential advantage over MUD grafts in situations where transplant is needed urgently. TableMatched Unrelated DonorHaplo Cord PN6445Age (range)62 (50-73)62 (50-74)AML/MDS45/2041/5 0.01ASBMTLow/Int /High21/6/3015/10/200.7KPS 9090Time to ANC >50010110.1Time to Plt >2018230.05PFS@ 1 Y (95% CI)46 (34-58)41 (26-56)0.6OS@ 1 Y (95% CI)57 (44-70)64 (49-79)0.8Cum Inc TRM @100 d (95% CI)9 (2-16)9 (0-18)0.2Cum Inc TRM @ 1 Y(95% CI)25 (14-36)29 (15-44)0.2Cum Inc Relapse @ 1Y (95% CI)30 (18-42)26 (12-40)0.5Cum Inc AGVHD @ 100 D (95% CI)25 (14-36)29 (13-43)0.7Cum Inc CGVHD @ 1 Y (95% CI)6 (0-12)7 (0-15)0.9 Disclosures van Besien: Miltenyi: Research Funding. Mark:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Artz:Miltenyi: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Lower Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Counts and Yields at Subsequent Donations Is Influenced By a Shorter Inter-Donation Interval between the First and Subsequent Mobilizations

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1962-1962
Author(s):  
Sandhya R. Panch ◽  
Brent R. Logan ◽  
Jennifer A. Sees ◽  
Bipin N. Savani ◽  
Nirali N. Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Introduction: Approximately 7% of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors are asked to donate a subsequent time to the same or different recipient. In a recent large CIBMTR study of second time donors, Stroncek et al. incidentally found that second peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections had lower total CD34+ cells, CD34+ cells per liter of whole blood processed, and CD34+ cells per kg donor weight. Based on smaller studies, the time between the two independent PBSC donations (inter-donation interval) as well as donor sex, race and baseline lymphocyte counts appear to influence CD34+ cell yields at subsequent donations. Our objective was to retrospectively evaluate factors contributory to CD34+ cell yields at subsequent PBSC donation amongst NMDP donors. Methods. The study population consisted of filgrastim (G-CSF) mobilized PBSC donors through the NMDP/CIBMTR between 2006 and 2017, with a subsequent donation of the same product. evaluated the impact of inter-donation interval, donor demographics (age, BMI, race, sex, G-CSF dose, year of procedure, need for central line) and changes in complete blood counts (CBC), on the CD34+ cell yields/liter (x106/L) of blood processed at second donation and pre-apheresis (Day 5) peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts/liter (x106/L) at second donation. Linear regression was used to model log cell yields as a function of donor and collection related variables, time between donations, and changes in baseline values from first to second donation. Stepwise model building, along with interactions among significant variables were assessed. The Pearson chi-square test or the Kruskal-Wallis test compared discrete variables or continuous variables, respectively. For multivariate analysis, a significance level of 0.01 was used due to the large number of variables considered. Results: Among 513 PBSC donors who subsequently donated a second PBSC product, clinically relevant decreases in values at the second donation were observed in pre-apheresis CD34+ cells (73.9 vs. 68.6; p=0.03), CD34+cells/L blood processed (32.2 vs. 30.1; p=0.06), and total final CD34+ cell count (x106) (608 vs. 556; p=0.02). Median time interval between first and second PBSC donations was 11.7 months (range: 0.3-128.1). Using the median pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts from donation 1 as the cut-off for high versus low mobilizers, we found that individuals who were likely to be high or low mobilizers at first donation were also likely to be high or low mobilizers at second donation, respectively (Table 1). This was independent of the inter-donation interval. In multivariate analyses, those with an inter-donation interval of >12 months, demonstrated higher CD34+cells/L blood processed compared to donors donating within a year (mean ratio 1.15, p<0.0001). Change in donor BMI was also a predictor for PBSC yields. If donor BMI decreased at second donation, so did the CD34+cells/L blood processed (0.74, p <0.0001). An average G-CSF dose above 960mcg was also associated with an increase in CD34+cells/L blood processed compared to donors who received less than 960mcg (1.04, p=0.005). (Table 2A). Pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cells on Day 5 of second donation were also affected by the inter-donation interval, with higher cell counts associated with a longer time interval (>12 months) between donations (1.23, p<0.0001). Further, independent of the inter-donation interval, GCSF doses greater than 960mcg per day associated with higher pre-apheresis CD34+ cells at second donation (1.26, p<0.0001); as was a higher baseline WBC count (>6.9) (1.3, p<0.0001) (Table 2B). Conclusions: In this large retrospective study of second time unrelated PBSC donors, a longer inter-donation interval was confirmed to be associated with better PBSC mobilization and collection. Given hematopoietic stem cell cycling times of 9-12 months in humans, where possible, repeat donors may be chosen based on these intervals to optimize PBSC yields. Changes in BMI are also to be considered while recruiting repeat donors. Some of these parameters may be improved marginally by increasing G-CSF dose within permissible limits. In most instances, however, sub-optimal mobilizers at first donation appear to donate suboptimal numbers of HSC at their subsequent donation. Disclosures Pulsipher: CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Bellicum: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Lecture; Jazz: Other: Education for employees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Honoraria. Shaw:Therakos: Other: Speaker Engagement.

Plerixafor (Mozobil ®)Plus G-CSF Is Effective in Mobilizing Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Patients with Concurrent Thrombocytopenia Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3229-3229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana N Micallef ◽  
Eric Jacobsen ◽  
Paul Shaughnessy ◽  
Sachin Marulkar ◽  
Purvi Mody ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Low Platelet Count ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3229 Poster Board III-166 Introduction Low platelet count prior to mobilization is a significant predictive factor for mobilization failure in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD) undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (auto-HSCT; Hosing C, et al, Am J Hematol. 2009). The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of HSC mobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF in patients with concomitant thrombocytopenia undergoing auto-HSCT. Methods Patients who had failed successful HSC collection with any mobilization regimen were remobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF as part of a compassionate use program (CUP). Mobilization failure was defined as the inability to collect 2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg or inability to achieve a peripheral blood count of ≥10 CD34+ cells/μl without having undergone apheresis. As part of the CUP, G-CSF (10μg/kg) was administered subcutaneously (SC) every morning for 4 days. Plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC) was administered in the evening on Day 4, approximately 11 hours prior to the initiation of apheresis the following day. On Day 5, G-CSF was administered and apheresis was initiated. Plerixafor, G-CSF and apheresis were repeated daily until patients collected the minimum of 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for auto-HSCT. Patients in the CUP with available data on pre-mobilization platelet counts were included in this analysis. While patients with a platelet count <85 × 109/L were excluded from the CUP, some patients received waivers and were included in this analysis. Efficacy of remobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF was evaluated in patients with platelet counts ≤ 100 × 109/L or ≤ 150 × 109/L. Results Of the 833 patients in the plerixafor CUP database, pre-mobilization platelet counts were available for 219 patients (NHL=115, MM=66, HD=20 and other=18.). Of these, 92 patients (NHL=49, MM=25, HD=8 and other=10) had pre-mobilization platelet counts ≤ 150 × 109/L; the median platelet count was 115 × 109/L (range, 50-150). The median age was 60 years (range 20-76) and 60.4% of the patients were male. Fifty-nine patients (64.1%) collected ≥2 × 109 CD34+ cells/kg and 13 patients (14.1%) achieved ≥5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The median CD34+ cell yield was 2.56 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The proportion of patients proceeding to transplant was 68.5%. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days and 22 days, respectively. Similar results were obtained when efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF was evaluated in 29 patients with platelet counts ≤ 100 × 109/L (NHL=12, MM=10, HD=3 and other=4). The median platelet count in these patients was 83 × 109/L (range, 50-100). The median age was 59 years (range 23-73) and 60.4% of the patients were male. The minimal and optimal cell dose was achieved in 19(65.5%) and 3(10.3%) patients, respectively. The median CD34+ cell yield was 2.92 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The proportion of patients proceeding to transplant was 62.1%. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days and 23 days, respectively. Conclusions For patients mobilized with G-CSF alone or chemotherapy ±G-CSF, a low platelet count prior to mobilization is a significant predictor of mobilization failure. These data demonstrate that in patients with thrombocytopenia who have failed prior mobilization attempts, remobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF allows ∼65% of the patients to collect the minimal cell dose to proceed to transplantation. Thus, in patients predicted or proven to be poor mobilizers, addition of plerixafor may increase stem cell yields. Future studies should investigate the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF in front line mobilization in patients with low platelet counts prior to mobilization. Disclosures Micallef: Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Jacobsen:Genzyme Corporation: Research Funding. Shaughnessy:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mody:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. van Rhee:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

The Abundance of Certain Bacteria in the Intestinal Flora Is Associated with Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 744-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Peled ◽  
Eric R. Littman ◽  
Lilan Ling ◽  
Satyajit Kosuri ◽  
Molly Maloy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Intestinal Flora ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Streptococcus Anginosus ◽  
Conditioning Intensity

Abstract The major causes of mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) are relapse, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and infection. We have previously reported that changes in the intestinal flora can affect GVHD, bacteremia, and overall survival. As intestinal bacteria are potent modulators of systemic immune responses, and since GVHD is correlated with graft-versus-tumor activity, we hypothesized that components of the intestinal flora could be associated with relapse after allo-HSCT. We applied a biomarker-discovery approach and performed a retrospective observational analysis of 160 adults who received an unmodified (T-cell-replete) allograft. Patients were prospectively enrolled in a fecal biospecimen-collection protocol. For this analysis, we selected patients who had at least one specimen during the first 3 weeks following allo-HSCT. The primary diseases in this cohort were AML (37%), Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (33%), ALL (8%), MDS (7%), CLL (6%), Hodgkin's Lymphoma (6%), CML (2%), and myeloproliferative neoplasm (2%). The mean age of the patients was 52 years (range 21-75). They were conditioned with ablative (17%), reduced-intensity (64%), and nonmyeloablative (19%) regimens. They received grafts from cord blood (46%), unrelated adults (33%), or related adults (22%). Among adult grafts, 92% were from peripheral blood and 8% were from bone marrow. A census of the bacterial species in each stool sample was generated by 16S rRNA deep-sequencing as previously described (Jenq et al., BiolBone Marrow Transplant 2015). The area under the curve of bacterial abundance over time was used as a measure of each patient's cumulative exposure to each bacterial taxon. Bacterial taxa of each patient present at a frequency >1% were evaluated for association with the outcome of relapse or progression of disease within the first year after allo-HSCT using linear discriminant analysis of effect size (LEfSe), a common approach in microbiota studies (Segata et al., Genome Biology, 2011). Among the taxons most significantly associated with freedom from relapse were members of the human oral flora including Streptococcus anginosus. After stratifying the patients by median abundance, we found that those with higher abundance of this bacterium had less relapse after transplantation (Left figure, p = 0.0014). We also identified bacteria associated with increased risk of relapse, such as Enterococcus faecium (Right figure, p = 0.0103). We evaluated these bacteria as biomarkers in multivariate Cox models adjusted for three factors that were associated with relapse in this cohort: Refined Disease Risk Index (RDRI, Armand et al., Blood 2014), conditioning intensity, and graft source (cord blood vs. adult donor). Streptococcus anginosus predicted relapse in a multivariate model adjusted for all three factors (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.96, p = 0.041). Enterococcus faecium predicted relapse in a model adjusted for RDRI and conditioning intensity but failed to do so in a model additionally adjusted for graft source. In this analysis there was no formal adjustment for multiple comparisons; these data are now being validated in an additional cohort of patients whose samples are being sequenced. Finally, although we have previously reported that low bacterial diversity is associated with decreased overall survival after allo-HSCT (Taur et al., Blood 2014), we did not find an association between bacterial diversity and relapse as assessed by reciprocal Simpson diversity index (p > 0.1). Thus, the results of this retrospective analysis have identified an association between relapse after allo-HSCT and the abundance of two bacteria in the intestinal flora. These might serve as potential novel diagnostics or therapeutic targets to prevent relapse and improve overall survival after allo-HSCT. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Peled: Merck: Research Funding. Giralt:SANOFI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TAKEDA: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding; JAZZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Perales:Merck: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; NMDP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. van den Brink:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board attendee; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tobira Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board attendee; Regeneron: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Haploidentical Vs. Matched Unrelated Donor Transplants Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Lymphoma: A Joint CIBMTR/EBMT Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 174-174
Author(s):  
Alberto Mussetti ◽  
Abraham S. Kanate ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Meilun He ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Matched Unrelated Donor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract Introduction: Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is a standard GVHD prophylactic approach for haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haploHCT). Retrospective studies in patients with lymphoma showed lower chronic GVHD in haploHCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis compared to matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT with calcineurin-based GVHD prophylaxis (+/- ATG). Recent retrospective studies showed that using MUD donors was better than haplo donors when PTCy and reduced-intensity conditioning are used for ALL, AML or MDS. However, no studies to date have compared haploHCT and MUD HCT when PTCy is used in the setting of lymphomas. Methods: 2155 adults (730 CIBMTR, 1425 EBMT) aged =/&gt;18 years who received their first haploHCT or MUD HCT (8/8 match at HLA-loci A, B, C and DRB1) using PTCy from 2010-2019 for lymphoma were included. The majority of both MUD (n=312; 14%) and haplo (n=1843; 86%) HCTs received reduced intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning (n=1655; 77%) using a peripheral blood stem cell graft (n=1379; 64%) and a three-drug GVHD prophylaxis (PTCy + calcineurin inhibitor + MMF, n=1805; 84%). Hodgkin's lymphoma was the most common indication (n=899; 42%) followed by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=525; 24%), T-cell lymphomas (n=328; 15%), mantle cell lymphoma (n=234; 11%) and follicular lymphoma (n=169; 8%). Most had chemosensitive disease at transplant (n=1781; 83%). Some main characteristics of the two cohorts are shown in Figure 1. Median follow-up among survivors was longer for haplo-HCT (36 and 31 months for the CIBMTR and EBMT cohort, respectively) than MUD-HCT (24 and 17 months, respectively). Cox proportional hazards models were built using stepwise forward and backward selection with a selection/retention threshold of 0.05. Any clinical variables that did not meet the proportional hazard assumption were adjusted for by stratification, and regression models were built to compare outcomes between donor types. Center effect was adjusted in all the models. Results: Figures 2 and 3 show the multivariate analysis results. Overall survival was 73% (71-75%) at 1 year and 65% (63-67%) at 2 years. Relapse was 21% (20-23%) at 1 year and 26% (24-28%) at 2 years. All outcomes favored MUD over haplo donors with the use of PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for both. Conclusions: Patients with lymphoma receiving PTCy HCT from MUDs demonstrated better outcomes than those with haplo donors in this retrospective study of CIBMTR and EBMT data Future prospective studies are needed to confirm and clarify the reasons for these differences. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mussetti: GILEAD: Other: Clinical trials participation, Research Funding; TAKEDA: Honoraria; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trials participation. Hamadani: Janssen, Incyte, ADC Therapeutics, Omeros, Morphosys, Kite: Consultancy; Sanofi, Genzyme, AstraZeneca, BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals and Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Glass: Novartis: Consultancy; Riemser: Research Funding; Helios Klinik Berlin-Buch: Current Employment; Kite: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Blaise: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Paczesny: Medical University of South Carolina: Patents & Royalties: inventor on the ST2 bispecific antibody patent application. Dreger: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Lee: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Other; Kadmon: Research Funding; National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Sureda: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Roche: Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document