A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Pilot Study of the JAK1 Selective Inhibitor Itacitinib for the Prophylaxis of Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Cytokine Release Syndrome in T-Cell Replete Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Introduction: Haploidentical peripheral blood allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (PB haplo-HCT) can be complicated by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Acute GVHD rates are higher with PB grafts compared with bone marrow, affecting 35-45% of patients and outcomes are poor in steroid refractory cases. Severe CRS occurs in 10-15% of patients receiving PB haplo-HCT and is associated with high non-relapse mortality and dismal one year overall survival between 25-30%. As interferon-γ and IL-6 are important mediators in both acute GVHD and CRS, we hypothesized that JAK1 inhibition with itacitinib could prevent these toxicities without impairing engraftment. Here we report the clinical outcomes from our pilot study of itacitinib with haplo-HCT (NCT03755414). Methods: Patients with AML, ALL, or NHL in remission undergoing PB haplo-HCT were treated with itacitinib 200 mg/day on days -3 through +100, followed by a taper. Myeloablative and reduced intensity conditioning were allowed. GVHD prophylaxis was tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Primary outcomes were incidence of primary graft failure and incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD. Secondary outcomes included incidence and severity of CRS (graded by Lee criteria). Peripheral blood and serum samples were banked prior to conditioning and on days -1, 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 100, end of treatment, and time of diagnosis of acute GVHD. Matched control samples were collected from patients undergoing haplo-HCT off clinical trials. Correlative studies include flow cytometry (FACS) with five 28-color panels for cellular subsets, mass cytometry (CyTOF) with 40-colors for intracellular signaling events, single cell RNA sequencing, and serum cytokine and chemokine measurements. Results: Twenty of a planned 20 patients completed enrollment and underwent haplo-HCT between 11/2019 and 3/2021. Median age at transplant was 49 (21-74). Diagnoses were AML (13), ALL (5) and NHL (2). Median follow up is 319 days, with 18/20 beyond 180 days. There were no cases of engraftment failure with short median times to neutrophil (14 days, range 12-20) and platelet (14 days, range 7-54) engraftment (historical 16 and 25 days, respectively). There were no cases of grade III-IV acute GVHD. The incidence of grade II acute GVHD on day 100 was 15%. Two patients developed grade I-II skin acute GVHD during itacitinib taper and responded to resumption of a higher dose. There were no cases of extensive chronic GVHD. There were no cases of severe CRS (historical rate 17%), with 90% of patients having grade 1 CRS and 10% having no CRS. Furthermore, no anti-IL6R or steroid therapy was used. Overall survival at day 180 was 90% (95% CI 75-100%) by Kaplan-Meier estimate. Incidence of relapse at 180 days was 5.5% (95% CI 0-15.6%). Refined GVHD and relapse-free survival at 180 days was 83% (95% CI 68-100%). All patients had full donor engraftment and >95% chimerism at day 100. FACS and CyTOF have been performed and analyzed for the day 28 time point from 14 patients and four controls. Flow cytometry revealed no difference in cell subset numbers between controls and patient samples. CyTOF revealed differences in intracellular signaling molecules between itacitinib and control patients - including higher Ki-67, pNF-κB, and Caspase3 in controls. Phospho-Stat1 and pStat3 were lower CD4 T subsets. FACS and CyTOF at remaining time points, single cell RNA sequencing, and serum cytokine and chemokine measurements are underway and will be presented at the ASH 2021 meeting. Conclusions: Itacitinib with PB haplo-HCT was safe with no engraftment failure and prompt engraftment. Rates of acute and chronic GVHD were low, without increased risk of relapse or transplant related mortality. Severe CRS was not seen in this trial, and no anti-IL6 or steroid therapy was used. Flow cytometry demonstrated comparable immune reconstitution in terms of cell lineage and number between treated patients and controls. Mass cytometry revealed lower Ki-67, pNF-κB, and caspase3 levels, among other markers, which suggest lower immune cell activity, proliferation, and apoptosis. An extension cohort of 20 additional patients is enrolling. Multi-platform correlative studies are underway, comparing samples from haplo-HCT patients treated with and without itacitinib. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Uy: Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Research Funding. Ghobadi: Atara: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Wugen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jacoby: Abbvie: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding. Pusic: Syndax: Other: Advisory Board. Schroeder: Equillium Inc: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria.

Treatment of Allosensitized Patients Receiving Allogeneic Transplantation

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT). Effective treatments are needed for these patients who often have no other donor options and/or are in need to proceed urgently to transplantation. We studied a multimodality treatment with alternate day plasma exchange, rituximab, intravenous gamma globulin (IvIg) and an irradiated donor buffy coat for patients with DSA at two institutions. Thirty-seven patients with a median age of 51 years were treated with this desensitization protocol. Treatment outcomes were compared with a control group of HaploSCT patients without DSA (N=345). Majority of patients in the DSA group were females (83.8% vs. 37.1% in controls, p<0.001) and received stem cells from a child as donor (67.6% vs. 44.1%, p=0.002). Mean DSA level before and after desensitization was 10,198 and 5,937 MFI, respectively with mean differences of 4,030 MFI. Fourteen of 30 tested patients (46.7%) had C1q positivity while 8 of 29 tested patients (27.6%) remained positive after desensitization. In multivariable analysis, patients with initial DSA >20,000 MFI and with persistent C1q+ after desensitization had a significantly lower engraftment rate, resulted in a significantly higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) and worse overall survival (OS) than controls whereas graft outcome and survivals of patients with initial DSA <20,000 MFI and those with negative C1q after treatment were comparable with controls. In conclusion, treatment with plasma exchange, rituximab, IvIg and donor buffy coat is effective in promoting engraftment in patients with DSA up to 20,000 MFI.

Chromatin remodeler CHD8 governs hematopoietic stem/progenitor survival by regulating ATM-mediated P53 protein stability

The Chd8 gene encodes a member of chromodomain helicase DNA-binding (CHD) family of SNF2H-like ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler, mutations of which define a subtype of Autism spectrum disorders. Increasing evidence from recent studies indicates that ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling genes are involved in the control of crucial gene-expression programs in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) regulation. Here we identify CHD8 as a specific and essential regulator of normal hematopoiesis. Loss of Chd8 leads to severe anemia, pan-cytopenia, bone marrow failure, and engraftment failure due to a drastic depletion of HSPCs. CHD8 forms a complex with ATM and its deficiency increases chromatin accessibility and drives genomic instability in HSPCs causing an activation of ATM kinase that further stabilizes P53 protein by phosphorylation and leads to increased HSPC apoptosis. Deletion of P53 rescues the apoptotic defects of HSPCs and restores overall hematopoiesis in Chd8-/- mice. Our findings demonstrate that chromatin organization by CHD8 is uniquely required for the maintenance of hematopoiesis by integrating the ATM-P53 mediated survival of HSPCs.

Rescue treatment with eltrombopag in refractory cytopenias after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Background: Patients with post-transplant cytopenias due to poor graft function or primary engraftment failure show poor prognosis with a high mortality rate mainly because of graft versus host disease (GVHD), infection and/or bleeding. Treatment options are scarce and a CD34+ stem cell boost or a second bone marrow transplantation may be required to restore adequate haematopoiesis. Methods: In the present study patients with primary engraftment failure ( n = 1) and refractory poor graft function ( n = 11) were treated with eltrombopag in a single centre. The reason for eltrombopag treatment was trilineage cytopenia in six patients, bilineage cytopenia in three patients and single lineage cytopenia in three patients. Eltrombopag was initiated at a median of 214 (range: 120–877) days after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCST) and administered for a median time of 114 (range: 12 days to >490) days. In 8/12 patients eltrombopag was introduced at a dose of 75 mg/day and then increased to 150 mg/day after 1 week; 1 patient was given 50 mg eltrombopag per day, and 3 patients received 75 mg daily. Results: In 10/12 patients eltrombopag significantly enhanced blood count values and patients became transfusion independent. Once stable haematological response was obtained, treatment was tapered until final discontinuation in 9/10 responding patients. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. At time of last follow up, 3/12 patients were dead, 2 due to disease relapse, 1 due to GVHD and pneumonia. All patients except one maintained their complete response and remain transfusion independent at a median of 858 (range: 429–1119) days. Conclusion: These preliminary data confirm that eltrombopag is able to rescue multilineage haematopoiesis in patients with treatment-refractory cytopenias after allogeneic HSCT.

Successful Bone Marrow Transplantation Using an Immunomyelosuppressive Conditioning in Patients with Severe Congenital Neutropenia: The Results of a Single-Institute

Severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) is a rare heterogeneous genetic disorder characterized by recurrent bacterial infections from early infancy due to severe chronic neutropenia. Majority of SCN patients have benefitted by the treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). However, patients on long-term G-CSF therapy have a relative risk of developing myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia. The only curable treatment for SCN patients is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Recently, HSCTs with reduced intensity conditioning regimens have been applied to the treatment for SCN patients prior to malignant transformation. However, the optimal conditioning of HSCT for SCN patients has not been established. In this study, we conducted bone marrow cell transplantations (BMT) in 16 patients with SCN using an immunomyelosuppressive conditioning regimen to minimize early and late transplant-related morbidity in Hiroshima University Hospital. A total of 17 BMT procedures were performed in 16 patients with SCN from 2008 to 2019. Five of 16 patients had experienced the engraftment failure of initial HSCT and 4 of them were referred to our hospital for re-transplantation. Fifteen of 16 patients had a heterozygous mutation in the ELANE gene. Bone marrow cells (BM) were obtained from 6 HLA-matched related, 3 HLA-matched unrelated, and 8 HLA-mismatched unrelated (7/8 antigens) donors, respectively. Conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, melphalan, total body irradiation (3.6 Gy) with or without antithymocyte globulin. Short-term methotrexate and tacrolimus were administered for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Engraftment of neutrophils was observed within post-transplant 24 days in all patients. Two patients developed graft failure on day 40 and day 90, respectively, after the temporal engraftment. However, both patients were rescued by second BMT from different HLA-matched unrelated donors receiving the same conditioning regimen. Four patients who received BMT from HLA-matched related donors developed stable mixed chimerism without neutropenia in peripheral blood for 3 to 10 years. Although one patient who received donor lymphocyte infusion due to mixed chimerism developed grade II acute GVHD and limited chronic GVHD, the others did not develop severe GVHD. All patients are alive for 6 months to 11 years after BMT with no signs of severe infections or transplantation-related morbidity. Similar conditioning regimen has been applied to BMT for 35 patients with chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) in our hospital. In that study 4 male adulthood patients with CGD already fathered each child by their wives through spontaneous pregnancy, implying the successful preservation of patients' fertility. Collectively, our results demonstrate that BMT with a sufficient immunosuppressive conditioning regimen may be a feasible and effective treatment for SCN patients, irrespective of initial engraftment failure. The excellent results in our cohort suggest that indications for proceeding to HSCT could be extended to patients without malignant transformation.The further analyses of accumulated cases are necessary to assess the efficacy, safety, and less late adverse effects related to HSCT including fertility. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.