Clonal Dynamics of IDH1 Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Abstract Introduction: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene is mutated in 7-14% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. IDH1 encodes for an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of isocitrate to α- ketoglutarate. IDH1 mutation leads to accumulation of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate. Clonal evolutionary dynamics of IDH1 mutations in AML have not been clearly characterized. The introduction of targeted small-molecule therapy, Ivosidenib, in AML treatment underscores the significance of understanding the topography of clonal dynamics in IDH1-mutated AML to optimize precision medicine. Methods: We analyzed ~6000 patients with next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and identified 107 patients with IDH1 mutated AML. Disease status was determined for each NGS test date by manual chart review. IDH1 mutation status was characterized during course of AML at diagnosis, remission, relapse, and with persistent disease. Cytogenic risk category was determined using ELN 2017 guidelines. Kaplan Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used to determine significant differences in overall survival among patient groups. Results: Of the 107 total patients, 39 patients (36%) had AML with myelodysplastic-related changes (AML-MRC) and 39 patients (36%) had AML-NOS. The most frequently co-mutated genes were SRSF2, DNMT3A, ASXL1, RUNX1, NRAS, BCOR, STAG2, NPM1, JAK2, and FLT-3 in order of frequency. Of the total patients, 74 patients (69%) had good cytogenetics, 17 patients (16%) had intermediate cytogenetics, and 16 patients (15%) had poor/very poor cytogenetics. Among the patients with IDH1-mutated AML, 85 patients (79%) were IDH1-positive at initial diagnosis, while 22 patients (21%) were IDH1- negative at diagnosis and acquired the mutation later in disease course. Of those 22 patients, 18 patients gained the mutation in the setting of persistent disease, 3 patients at remission, and 1 patient at relapse. In those with persistent AML (n=42), 30 patients (71%) remained IDH1-positive while 12 patients (29%) lost the mutation. In those achieving remission (n=66), 12 patients (18%) who were IDH1-positive remained IDH1-positive while 51 patients (77%) cleared the mutation. In those with relapsed disease (n= 21), 17 patients (81%) with IDH1-positive AML remained IDH1-positive while 4 patients (19%) lost the mutation at relapse. There were no significant differences in median overall survival in patients who were positive or negative for IDH1 mutations at diagnosis, positive or negative with disease persistence, or among patients who remained IDH1-positive or lost the IDH1 mutation at disease relapse. Patients that were IDH1-positive at diagnosis were more likely to have poorer cytogenetics than patients who were IDH1-negative at diagnosis (p=0.0016). Conclusion: In summary, this study found that IDH1 mutations are unstable throughout the course of AML and periodic genetic testing of AML patients is necessary for optimizing precision medicine approaches. In disease remission, most patients (77%) cleared the IDH1 mutation. In the relapse setting, 81% of patients retained IDH1-positive status. Our study, the largest of its kind to our knowledge, shows that serial genomic profiling for the IDH1 mutation across disease course may be beneficial in helping to tailor targeted therapy for IDH1+ AML. Disclosures Sweet: Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sallman: Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Intellia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Consultancy; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hussaini: Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celegene: Consultancy; Decibio: Consultancy; Guidepoint: Consultancy; Bluprint Medicine: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Impact of Day 28 Absolute Lymphocyte Count on Outcome of Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5256.5256 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5256-5256

Author(s):

Naresh Bumma ◽

Jing Ai ◽

Xuefei Jia ◽

Sean Hobson ◽

Donna Abounader ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Lymphocyte Count ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Absolute Lymphocyte Count ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction: Lymphocyte recovery after induction chemotherapy (IC) predicts outcome in adult patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Behl et al. Leukemia 2006; 20: 29-34). However, it is unknown whether absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery after IC predicts outcome in those pts who are then treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHCT) in first complete remission (CR1). We hypothesized that the prognostic impact of ALC might be nullified by AHCT in CR1 due to the abrogation of normal immunologic recovery. In this study, our aims were to (1) evaluate the impact of Day 28 ALC on all AML pts receiving IC and (2) to specifically, evaluate the impact of Day 28 ALC on the subset of AML pts proceeding to AHCT in CR1. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 180 adult AML pts (≥ 18 years of age) who were treated with IC during the years 2001- 2012 at the Cleveland Clinic was performed. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Pts with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded . Ninety-four of the 180 pts received AHCT in CR1. A total of 141 AML pts receiving IC and a total of 66 pts receiving IC and then receiving AHCT in CR1 were eligible for data analysis because Day 28 ALC was missing in the remainder of the pts. Prior studies in AML identified an ALC of < 500/ µL at Day 28 of IC as predictive of overall survival. We stratified Day 28 ALC into the following categories: (a)< 250/ µL (b) < 350/ µL (c) < 500/ µL and (d) < 500/ µL for Max ALC [Max ALC was defined as the maximum ALC value between days 26 and 30 after the initiation of IC]. Other variables collected included age at diagnosis, WBC at diagnosis, and cytogenetic (CG) risk. CG risk was ascribed by CALBG criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to summarize overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), which were measured for all pts from the time of diagnosis. The log-rank test was used for univariate analysis of categorical factors and the Cox proportional hazards model was used for measured factors and multivariate analysis. We performed two separate analyses : one for all AML pts (n=141); and a second analysis only focusing on those receiving AHCT in CR1 (n=66). Results: Pt characteristics for the entire AML cohort: The median age was 58.0 years (20.0-80.0); 46.1% female. The median WBC at diagnosis was 11.6 K / µL (range 0.7-220.7) and median Day 28 ALC was 400/ µL (0-2.4). Twenty-seven pts (19.7%) had favorable CG, 84 (61.3%) intermediate, and 26 (19.0%) unfavorable. Most pts (91%) received "7+3" IC and 93 (66%) also received at least 1 cycle of post-remission chemotherapy. On univariate analysis, age ≥60 (HR 2.72, p< 0.001), CG risk (HR 2.13, p < 0.001), Day 28 ALC < 250/ µL (HR 1.60, p=0.022), Day 28 ALC < 350/ µL (HR 1.57, p=0.029), and max ALC < 500/ µL (HR 1.54, p=0.035) were associated with a worse OS from the initiation of treatment. Low ALC was associated with both a higher incidence of refractory disease and death during induction (p=0.015). In our second analysis of pts undergoing AHCT in CR1, although not statistically significant, max ALC < 500/ µL (during IC) was associated with a trend towards decreased OS from the start of treatment on both univariate (HR 1.88,p= 0.13) and multivariate (HR 2.16, p=0.075) analysis. Conclusions: Max ALC < 500/ µL is predictive of outcome in AML pts undergoing IC, and there is a suggestion that this effect may not be abrogated by AHCT. A larger study will be needed to further confirm these findings. Therapies to improve lymphocyte recovery may be important in the treatment of AML. Disclosures Sekeres: Boehringer-Ingelheim Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Assessment of Patients Fitness at Diagnosis in Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4012.4012 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4012-4012

Author(s):

Semra Aydin ◽

Ernesta Audisio ◽

Stefano D'Ardia ◽

Bernardino Allione ◽

Barbara Nicolino ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Intensive Chemotherapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Perfect Agreement ◽

Medical Board ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background:Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease which predominantly affects patients with a median age at diagnosis over 65 years. The elderly population is highly heterogeneous and assessment strategies are needed to define the frailty profile. To date, evaluation of disease-related and patients specific factors in the context of clinic decision making has been largely subjective. Concerning AML therapy, several studies demonstrated improved survival for older patients receiving intensive induction chemotherapy compared to those receiving supportive care alone. Defining this subset of patients who are eligible or "fit" for intensive chemotherapy involves a great deal of subjectivity. Criteria yet have to be standardized across or within institutions. Aim:Aim of this study was to investigate the validity of four scores for assessment of patient fitness at diagnosis in parallel to physician evaluation. Further patient outcome according the respective evaluation was compared. Methods: In a single hematology center a total of 85 clinically and molecularly well characterized consecutive elderly (>60 years) patients with newly diagnosed AML were treated from 2012 to 2015 according to age, performance status and co-morbidities. Therapy response was defined according to ELN criteria. Therapy intensity decision was based on an initial haematologist evaluation followed by discussion of the patient case in an interdisciplinary board. Independently from the medical board, in parallel the local geriatric G8 screening tool, consisting of seven items from the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) questionnaire and age, the HCT-CI comorbidity score as well as the AML scores proposed by the German Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cooperative Group, predicting probability of complete remission (CR) and early death (ED) were performed. Overall survival from diagnosis was compared between groups using the Cox model. Results:A total of 42 (49,4%) patients were evaluated "fit" by the medical board and treated by intensive chemotherapy ("7+3" regimen), whereas 4 patients (4,7%) underwent semi-intensive with hypomethylating agents and 39 patients (45,8%) received palliative therapy (low dose Cytarabine or Hydroxyurea). Twenty-six patients (30,6%) achieved a complete remission after induction chemotherapy, could follow consolidation chemotherapy and six of them underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Fourty-four (51,8%) were non responders and 15 patients (17,6%) died during the first cycle. Overall, the median survival time was 6,7 months (95% CI 3,7-9,5). Primary physician care evaluation was able to define in a statistically significant manner a "fit" from an "unfit" patient. Median survival time from the "fit" patients was 10 moths (95%CI 5-not reached) compared to the "unfit" evaluated patients with 3,4 months (95%CI 1,4-5), p<0.001 with a HR (95%CI) of 3,18 (1,81 to 5,59). Parallel evaluation of patients unfitness according the proposed cut-point of the G8 (≤14), AML for CR (<40) and AML for ED (≥30) scores discriminated significantly patients survival with HRs equal to 3.03 (p<0,001), 2.11 (p=0,007) and 2.83 (p<0.001), respectively. The agreement between the frailty scores and physician evaluation on the prediction of fitness classification was analyzed by calculating the Cohens' Kappa. In this approach a Kappa level of 1,0 denotes perfect agreement. The agreement of was moderate for HCT-CI score and AML score for CR (0.47 and 0.46, respectively). The agreement was fair for G8 and AML score for ED (0.27 and 0.33, respectively). Summary/Conclusion: In conclusion, in the present AML cohort the applied frailty scores at diagnosis correlated significantly with the median overall survival. Since no perfect agreement was found respect to physician for fitness classification, frailty scores can help to improve the prognosis prediction. These results may encourage a following multi-centre analysis in order to increase the statistic power of the performed analysis. Disclosures Vitolo: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Honoraria for lectures; Gilead: Other: Honoraria for lectures; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Honoraria for lectures; Takeda: Other: Honoraria for lectures.

Download Full-text

Outcomes By Best Response with Hypomethylating Agent Plus Venetoclax in Adults with Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149782 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2292-2292

Author(s):

Virginia Olivia Volpe ◽

Akriti G Jain ◽

Onyee Chan ◽

Eric Padron ◽

David A. Sallman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Free State ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Best Response ◽

Baseline Characteristics ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (HMA) (HMA+VEN) is a standard of care treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy. In the phase 3 VIALE-A trial, azacididine (aza)+VEN compared to aza alone demonstrated an improved overall survival of 14.7 months versus 9.6 months, respectively. A common toxicity with HMA+VEN is myelosuppression. The prognostic implications of incomplete count recovery despite leukemia free state after HMA+VEN treatment in AML is unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes of those who achieved complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), or morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) in AML patients treated frontline with HMA+VEN. Methods: Patients seen at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2019 and 2021 diagnosed with AML and treated with frontline HMA+VEN were retrospectively evaluated and included for analysis. Patients were stratified by best response; either CR, CRi, or MLFS. Baseline characteristics were compared by chi square (categorical variables) and t- test (continuous variables). Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from date of diagnosis and groups were compared using log-rank test. Results: Of the 102 patients treated with HMA+VEN in the frontline setting, 48% (n=49) had blast clearance with a best response of CR in 27/102 (26.4%), CRi in 16/102 (15.7%), or MLFS in 6/102 (5.9%). The remainder had residual disease. Baseline characteristics were similar among the three response groups (Table 1) as was mutational distribution (Table 2). There was no difference between AML WHO classification subtype (p= .148). Decitabine or aza was used at the discretion of the treating physician did not significantly impact responses (p= .225). In those who achieved CR, 14% had prior therapy related AML compared to 37.5% in CRi and 33.3% in MLFS (p= .314). Antecedent MDS or MPN with transformation to AML was seen in 22.2%, 18.8%, and 66.7% of CR, CRi, and MLFS respectively (p= .029). Of those, 3.7% in CR group had HMA use for prior MDS/MPN compared to 0% in CRi and 50% in MLFS (p= .000). The median relapse free survival was not reached for CR, CRi, and MLFS (Figure 1), it is important to note that 3 of the 6 MLFS patients died without relapse . At median follow up of 23 months, median overall survival (OS) in the CR group was significantly longer, 31 months, compared to 18 months in the CRi group and 8.5 months in the MLFS group (p=0.0415) (Figure 2). Transplant was achieved in 26% of CR and 6.3% of CRi and 0% of MLFS and was not significant among the groups (p = .124). Conclusion: Patients who received frontline HMA+VEN for AML directed therapy and achieved CR/CRi had better survival compared to those who achieved MLFS. Our data suggest that incomplete recovery of blood counts plays a significant role in overall survival regardless of leukemia free state. Further, the data demonstrate significantly higher secondary AML with antecedent MDS or MPN in the MLFS group compared to CR and CRi groups. Of those, prior HMA therapy was also identified as significantly higher in the MLFS group compared to CR and CRi groups which may contribute to the prolonged cytopenias and worse OS. While the limitation to this study is overall small number of patients, it suggests that a goal of CR over CRi or MLFS is desirable for superior OS. In the future, it would be of interest to incorporate the rates of responses and variables that may have an impact such as therapy dose adjustment, time to response, and delays in therapy due to cytopenia. Additional studies identifying dose adjustments or other ways to improve hematologic recovery would be valuable to potentially improve outcomes in this difficult to treat population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Padron: Stemline: Honoraria; Taiho: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Blueprint: Honoraria; Kura: Research Funding. Sallman: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Intellia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Consultancy; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Geron: Consultancy; BMSCelgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Taiho Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lancet: AbbVie: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Millenium Pharma/Takeda: Consultancy; ElevateBio Management: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy; BerGenBio: Consultancy. Sweet: AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Characteristics and Outcomes Of Patients (pts) With Multiple Myeloma (MM) Who Develop Therapy (t)-Related Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), t-Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), Or t-Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1424.1424 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1424-1424

Author(s):

Naveen Pemmaraju ◽

Dhaval Shah ◽

Hagop M Kantarjian ◽

Verena Wagner ◽

Robert Z. Orlowski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background There has been a significant improvement in the outcome for patients (pts) with MM over the last decade, mainly due to the availability of immunomodulatory (IMiD) drugs and proteasome inhibitors (PI). The improvement in survival has also increased the risk of second primary malignancies (SPM), such as therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS), therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (t-CMML) or therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML). However, little is known about the characteristics and outcomes of pts with t-MDS, t-CMML or t-AML. Methods We aimed to study the characteristics and outcome of pts who developed t-MDS, t-AML and t-CMML as SPM after the treatment of MM. We reviewed our database of pts with MM who were treated at our institution between 1993 and 2011. We identified 49 pts who were diagnosed to have t-MDS, t-CMML, or t-AML. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the time to develop t-MDS, t-AML and t-CMML, their response to treatment and overall survival. Results Median age of pts at diagnosis of MM was 61 years. Forty-seven (96%) pts had symptomatic MM, while 2 (4%) had asymptomatic myeloma. Forty-seven (95%) pts with symptomatic myeloma received systemic therapy. Eleven (22%) pts were treated with IMiD or PI: lenalidomide 3, thalidomide 6 and bortezomib 2. Thirty-eight (78%) pts were treated with various conventional chemotherapeutic agents including melphalan, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, cisplatin, idarubicin, thiotepa, busulfan, carmustine and cytarabine. Fourteen (28%) pts also received radiation therapy to the affected areas. Twenty (41%) pts underwent high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Fourteen pts received maintenance therapy after auto-HCT with either thalidomide, lenalidomide, dexamethasone or bortezomib. Median time from the diagnosis of MM to t-MDS, t-CMML or t-AML was 6 years [0 – 24]. Thirty-four (69 %) pts developed t-MDS, 12 (24%) t-AML, and 3 (6%) t-CMML. Median age at diagnosis of t-MDS, t- CMML, or t-AML was 65 years. Twenty-seven (79%) pts with t-MDS and all 12 pts with t-AML had complex/high risk cytogenetics. Most common cytogenetic abnormalities involved chromosome 5 and 7. Thirty four (69%) pts received at least 1 cycle of induction chemotherapy either with conventional chemotherapeutic agents or investigational drugs. Only 9 pts (26%) achieved complete remission (CR). Median duration of CR in these pts was 4 months [1 – 62]. Median overall survival (OS) of pts who received induction therapy was 6.0 months [0-30]. Five (11%) pts received an allogeneic stem cell transplant with three achieving CR. Median OS in this subgroup of pts was 18 months [9 – 23]. Median OS for all 49 pts after diagnosis of t-MDS, t-CMML or t-AML was 6.0 months [0 – 30] Conclusion Development of t-MDS, t-CMML, or t-AML in pts with MM is associated with a poor outcome. These pts in general have complex cytogenetic abnormalities, chemo-resistant disease, a short CR and OS. A better understanding of disease biology and novel therapeutic approaches are warranted. Disclosures: Orlowski: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Resverlogix: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Qazilbash:Otsuka: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Venetoclax Therapy in a Heavily Treated Cohort of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Update of the Pethema Registry Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150231 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2325-2325

Author(s):

Jorge Labrador ◽

Miriam Saiz-Rodríguez ◽

Maria Dunia De Miguel ◽

Almudena De Laiglesia ◽

Carlos Rodriguez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction The prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (RR-AML) is very poor, and treatment options are very limited. The exciting results of venetoclax (VEN) in untreated AML have led to its off-label use in RR-AML. However, evidence in RR-AML is still scarce and the available data are mostly from retrospective and single-center studies. The aim of our study was to analyze the effectiveness of VEN use in patients with RR-AML reported to the PETHEMA AML epidemiological registry. Initial results were presented previously (Labrador J, et al. ASH 2020). Here, we report an updated analysis. Methods We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of a cohort of patients with AML-RR who were treated with venetoclax in the hospitals of the PETHEMA group. We evaluated efficacy, CR/CRi rate and overall survival (OS). We performed a descriptive analysis. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Fifty-one patients were included, 33 men and 18 women, with a median age of 68 years (25-82). The main characteristics of the included patients are shown in Table 1. With a median follow-up of 167 days, 10/51 patients (19%) continued to receive VEN at the time of analyses. Patients received a median of 2 cycles (0-8). VEN was administered with azacitidine (AZA) in 59%, with decitabine (DEC) in 29% and with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in 12% of patients, respectively. The CR/CRi and partial response (PR) rates were 12.4% and 10.4%, respectively. The CR/RCi and overall response (ORR, CR/CRi+PR) was higher in patients receiving VEN+AZA (17.9% and 32.1%) than in those receiving DEC + VEN (6.7% and 13.3%) or LDAC + VEN (0%). The presence of NPM1 or CEBPA variants were the only two variables associated with increased CR/CRi with VEN in RR-AML. Median OS was 104 days (95% CI: 56 - 151) (Figure 1A), 120 days in combination with AZA, 104 days with DEC, and 69 days with LDAC; p=0.875. Treatment response (Figure 1B) and ECOG 0 were the only variables that influenced OS in a multivariate model adjusted for age and sex (Table 2). VEN-resistant patients who received subsequent salvage therapy had superior median OS (98 vs. 5 days, p=0.004).Twenty-eight percent of patients required discontinuation of VEN due to toxicity. Sixty-one percent of patients required admission, mainly due to infections (45%), 10% due to bleeding and other causes in 12%. One case of tumor lysis syndrome was described. Conclusions Our real-life series depicts a marginal probability of CR/CRi and poor OS after venetoclax-based salvage. Patients treated with this regimen had very poor-risk features, and were heavily pre-treated, which could explain in part the observed poor outcomes. Although follow-up is still short, the small proportion of responders did not reach the median OS. Further studies will help to identify those patients potentially benefiting from venetoclax-based salvage regimens. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Belén Vidriales: Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Pérez-Encinas: Janssen: Consultancy. Tormo: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Montesinos: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline/Menarini: Consultancy; Tolero Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Download Full-text

Use of Venetoclax in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The Pethema Registry Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141191 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2-3

Author(s):

Jorge Labrador ◽

Miriam Saiz-Rodríguez ◽

Maria Dunia De Miguel ◽

María Belén Vidriales ◽

Manuel Perez Encinas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Off Label ◽

Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Acute Myeloid

Introduction The prognosis of patients with recurrent or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML-RR) is very poor, especially if they are not candidates for allogeneic transplantation (allo-SCT) after a second complete response (CR). Venetoclax, a potent and selective inhibitor of the antiapoptotic protein BCL-2, was approved by the FDA in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with newly diagnosed AML of age ≥ 75 years, or who have comorbidities that preclude the use of intensive chemotherapy. However, the evidence in AML-RR patients is still scarce. For this reason, the objective of our study is to retrospectively analyze the efficacy of the off-label use of venetoclax in patients with AML-RR. Methods We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of a cohort of patients with AML-RR who were treated with venetoclax in the hospitals of the PETHEMA group. We evaluated efficacy, CR/CRi rate and overall survival (OS). We performed a descriptive analysis. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results A total of 41 patients were included, 25 men and 16 women, with a median age of 68 years (25 - 82 years) and an ECOG ≥ 2 at the beginning of the venetoclax treatment in 52% of the cases. Seventy-five percent of patients had AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. 25 patients (61%) were at high risk according to the European Leukemia Net 2017. Sixty-six percent of patients received ≥2 previous lines (range, 1-4), 29 patients (71%) received intensive first line chemotherapy, 10 (25%) received a previous transplant and 18 (44%) received previous treatment with HMA. Venetoclax median treatment duration was 40 days, and it was administered in 54% with azacitidine, 34% with decitabine and 12% with LDAC. In all, 11% of patients achieved CR/CRi. Only 10% of patients received subsequent salvage treatment. With a median follow-up time of 166 days (range, 21 - 311), 65% of the patients died. The median OS from diagnosis was 15 months (1 - 67 months) and the median from venetoclax initiation was 78 days (2 - 311 days). Those patients who achieved CR/CRi had higher OS (median not reached vs. 78 days, p= 0.048). Regarding toxicity, it was the expected in these patients. Twenty-eight percent of the patients required discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity. Sixty percent of the patients were admitted at some time during treatment with venetoclax, mainly because of infections (53%), 12% because of bleeding and other causes in 15%. Conclusions Our real-life series depicts a marginal probability of CR/CRi and poor OS after venetoclax-based salvage. Patients treated with this regimen had very poor-risk features, and were heavily pre-treated, which could explain in part the observed poor outcomes. Although follow-up is still short, the small proportion of responders did not reach the median overall survival. Further studies will help to identify those patients potentially benefiting from venetoclax-based salvage regimens. Disclosures Sanchez: Amgem: Other: travel grants; Janssen: Other: travel grants; Roche: Other: travel grants; Abbvie: Other: travel grants; Celgene: Other: travel grants. Tormo:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: The objective of our study is to retrospectively analyze the efficacy of the off-label use of venetoclax in patients with recurrent or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Download Full-text

Donor Cell Acute Myeloid Leukemia after Transplant for Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122932 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5697-5697

Author(s):

Lacey S. Williams ◽

Catherine E. Lai

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Donor Cell ◽

Cell Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Donor Cell Leukemia ◽

Acute Myeloid

Donor cell leukemia is postulated to account for up to 5% of all leukemia "relapses" after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT), though in many cases this is the first leukemia diagnosis for the patient if their transplant was for non-leukemia primary diseases. The rarity of the condition and heterogeneity of disease create challenges in diagnosis and management. In the present case, donor cell leukemia (DCL) developed in a 68-year-old female after allogeneic SCT 18 years earlier for follicular lymphoma. Only one other case of DCL after transplantation for follicular lymphoma has been reported (Boulton-Jones et al., Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2005). Furthermore, this case is atypical in that the presentation occurred many years after transplantation, since very few cases of DCL occur more than 15 years after original transplant. Case In 1993, the patient was diagnosed with stage IIIA follicular lymphoma at age 50. She achieved a complete remission with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) for 4 years. She relapsed in 1998 and received treatment with fludarabine and mitoxantrone. In 1999, she enrolled in a toxitumomab clinical trial (NCT00268203) but discontinued therapy secondary to side effects. Due to persistent disease, she proceeded with SCT and received EPOCH-F (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fludarabine) prior to allogeneic SCT from her brother in 2000 (6/6 HLA match), augmented with TH2 cells. She received graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with cyclosporine, however her post transplant course was complicated by engraftment syndrome and gastrointestinal and skin GVHD. In 2019, she presented to hematology for evaluation of worsening chronic neutropenia and thrombocytopenia persistent for three years, noted during work-up for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Bone marrow biopsy revealed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a hypocellular marrow with 30% blasts and myelodysplasia related changes. Her cytogenetics showed 46XY, +1, der(1;7)(q10;p10)/47,sl,+8/46,XY. FISH analyses demonstrated deletion 7q31 D7S486 locus in 156/200 cells (78%). NGS panel showed IDH1 (VAF16%) and U2AF1 (VAF 26%) mutations. Based on cytogenetics and chimerism studies showing 100% donor, the patient was diagnosed with donor-derived AML secondary to allogeneic SCT from her brother. The brother currently has no known hematologic problems. The patient was treated with CPX-351 (liposomal cytarabine and daunorubicin) and achieved a complete remission, followed by consolidation with CPX-351. Given her complex cytogenetics and poor prognosis, the patient proceeded to non-myeloablative haploidentical peripheral blood SCT from her son, with post-transplant cyclophosphamide. She subsequently had complications of neutropenic fever and C. dificile colitis, with progressive colitis leading to her death on day 22 after SCT. Discussion Though cytogenetic and molecular studies along with functional status assist clinicians in treatment decisions for DCL patients, the benefits and risks of treatment remain difficult to balance for this unique subset of leukemia. Of patients that achieve remission for greater than 18 months, many undergo second allogeneic SCT, however a similar number of patients have remissions of at least 18 months treated with chemotherapy alone (Wiseman, Biology of Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2011). In 15 reported cases that went to SCT, approximately 50% lived longer than 12 months after their DCL diagnosis. Second allogeneic SCT is often favored after initial remission in patients with good performance status due to high risk for relapse. This case illustrates the challenge in management of donor cell leukemia, a rather rare entity with very few cases in the literature developing greater than 15 years after transplant. Limited robust evidence favoring a particular treatment supports the need for further prospective studies. Disclosures Lai: Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase I Study of Ixazomib with Conventional Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140584 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 7-8

Author(s):

Philip C. Amrein ◽

Eyal C. Attar ◽

Geoffrey Fell ◽

Traci M. Blonquist ◽

Andrew M. Brunner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Remission Rate ◽

Conventional Chemotherapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Secondary Aml ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Outcomes for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) among older patients has remained largely unchanged for decades. Long-term survival for patients aged >60 years is poor (median survival 10.5 months). Targeting the proteasome in AML is attractive, since leukemia stem cells have demonstrated sensitivity to proteasome inhibition in preclinical models, perhaps through down regulation of nuclear NF-KB (Guzman, Blood 2001). AML cell lines are susceptible to synergistic cytotoxicity when bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is combined with daunorubicin and cytarabine. We have shown that adding bortezomib to standard treatment in AML results in a high remission rate, although grade 2 sensory neurotoxicity was noted in approximately 12% of treated patients. A newer generation proteasome inhibitor, ixazomib, is less frequently associated with neurotoxicity, and, therefore, was selected for combination with conventional chemotherapy in this phase I trial. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib in combination with conventional induction and consolidation chemotherapy for AML. Herein are the initial results of this trial. Methods: Adults >60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML were screened for eligibility. Patients with secondary AML were eligible, including those with prior hypomethylating agent therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We excluded those with promyelocytic leukemia. There were 2 phases in this study. In the first phase (A), the induction treatment consisted of the following: cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day by continuous IV infusion, Days 1-7; daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/day IV, Days 1, 2, 3, and ixazomib was provided orally at the cohort dose, Days 2, 5, 9, and 12. Consolidaton or transplant was at the discretion of the treating physician in phase A. In the second phase (B), induction was the same as that with the determined MTD of ixazomib. All patients were to be treated with the following consolidation: cytarabine at 2 g/m2/day, days 1-5 with ixazomib on days 2, 5, 9, and 12 at the cohort dose for consolidation. A standard 3 + 3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine whether the dose of ixazomib could be safely escalated in 3 cohorts (1.5 mg/day, 2.3 mg/day, 3.0 mg/day), initially in induction (phase A) and subsequently in consolidation (phase B). The determined MTD of ixazomib in the first portion (A) of the trial was used during induction in the second portion (B), which sought to determine the MTD for ixazomib during consolidation. Secondary objectives included rate of complete remission, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-six patients have been enrolled on study, and 28 have completed dose levels A-1 through A-3 and B1 through B-2. Full information on cohort B-3 has not yet been obtained, hence, this report covers the experience with the initial 28 patients, cohorts A-1 through B-2. There were 12 (43%) patients among the 28 with secondary AML, either with prior hematologic malignancy or therapy-related AML. Nineteen patients (68%) were male, and the median age was 68 years (range 61-80 years). There have been no grade 5 toxicities due to study drug. Three patients died early due to leukemia, 2 of which were replaced for assessment of the MTD. Nearly all the grade 3 and 4 toxicities were hematologic (Table). There was 1 DLT (grade 4 platelet count decrease extending beyond Day 42). There has been no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity with ixazomib to date. Among the 28 patients in the first 5 cohorts, 22 achieved complete remissions (CR) and 2 achieved CRi, for a composite remission rate (CCR) of 86%. Among the 12 patients with secondary AML 8 achieved CR and 2 achieved CRi, for a CCR of 83%. The median OS for the 28 patients has not been reached (graph). The 18-month OS estimate was 65% [90% CI, 50-85%]. Conclusions: The highest dose level (3 mg) of ixazomib planned for induction in this trial has been reached safely. For consolidation there have been no serious safety issues in the first 2 cohorts with a dose up to 2.3 mg, apart from 1 DLT in the form of delayed platelet count recovery. The recommended phase 2 dose of ixazomib for induction is 3 mg. Accrual to cohort B-3 is ongoing. Notably, to date, no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity has been encountered. The remission rate in this older adult population with the addition of ixazomib to standard chemotherapy appears favorable. Figure Disclosures Amrein: Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Attar:Aprea Therapeutics: Current Employment. Brunner:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hobbs:Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Fathi:Blueprint: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib is FDA approved for multiple myeloma. We are using it in this trial for acute myeloid leukemia.

Download Full-text

Epigenetic Activation of the pH Regulator MCT4 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Exploits a Fundamental Metabolic Process of Enhancing Cell Growth through Proton Shifting

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123604 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3765-3765

Author(s):

Cheuk-Him Man ◽

David T. Scadden ◽

Francois Mercier ◽

Nian Liu ◽

Wentao Dong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Cell Growth ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Monocarboxylate Transporter ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Acute Myeloid

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells exhibit metabolic alterations that may provide therapeutic targets not necessarily evident in the cancer cell genome. Among the metabolic features we noted in AML compared with normal hematopoietic stem and progenitors (HSPC) was a strikingly consistent alkaline intracellular pH (pHi). Among candidate proton regulators, monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4) mRNA and protein were differentially increased in multiple human and mouse AML cell lines and primary AML cells. MCT4 is a plasma membrane H+and lactate co-transporter whose activity necessarily shifts protons extracellularly as intracellular lactate is extruded. MCT4 activity is increased when overexpressed or with increased intracellular lactate generated by glycolysis in the setting of nutrient abundance. With increased MCT4 activity, extracellular lactate and protons will increase causing extracellular acidification while alkalinizing the intracellular compartment. MCT4-knockout (MCT4-KO) of mouse and human AMLdid not induce compensatory MCT1 expression, reduced pHi, suppressed proliferation and improved animal survival. Growth reduction was experimentally defined to be due to intracellular acidification rather than lactate accumulation by independent modulation of those parameters. MCT4-KOmetabolic profiling demonstrated decreased ATP/ADP and increased NADP+/NADPH suggesting suppression of glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) that was confirmed by stable isotopic carbon flux analyses. Notably,the enzymatic activity of purified gatekeeper enzymes, hexokinase 1 (HK1), pyruvate kinase M2 isoform (PKM2) and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) was sensitive to pH with increased activity at the leukemic pHi (pH 7.6) compared to normal pHi (pH 7.3). Evaluating MCT4 transcriptional regulation, we defined that activating histonemarks, H3K27ac and H3K4me3, were enriched at the MCT4 promoter region as were transcriptional regulators MLL1 and Brd4 by ChIP in AML compared with normal cells. Pharmacologic inhibition of Brd4 suppressed Brd4 and H3K27ac enrichment and MCT4 expression in AML and reduced leukemic cell growth. To determine whether MCT4 based pHi changes were sufficient to increase cell proliferation, we overexpressed MCT4 in normal HSPC and demonstrated in vivo increases in growth in conjunction with pHi alkalization. Some other cell types also were increased in their growth kinetics by MCT4 overexpression and pHi increase. Therefore, proton shifting may be a means by which cells respond to nutrient abundance, co-transporting lactate and protons out of the cell, increasing the activity of enzymes that enhance PPP and glycolysis for biomass generation. Epigenetic changes in AML appear to exploit that process by increasing MCT4 expression to enforce proton exclusion thereby gaining a growth advantage without dependence on signaling pathways. Inhibiting MCT4 and intracellular alkalization may diminish the ability of AML to outcompete normal hematopoiesis. Figure Disclosures Scadden: Clear Creek Bio: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Sponsored research; Editas Medicine: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bone Therapeutics: Consultancy; Fog Pharma: Consultancy; Red Oak Medicines: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LifeVaultBio: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

EZH2 Mutations and Impact on Clinical Outcome Analyzed in 1604 Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114421 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1528-1528

Author(s):

Sebastian Stasik ◽

Jan Moritz Middeke ◽

Michael Kramer ◽

Christoph Rollig ◽

Alwin Krämer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mutational Status ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Purpose: The enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is a histone methyltransferase and key epigenetic regulator involved in transcriptional repression and embryonic development. Loss of EZH2 activity by inactivating mutations is associated with poor prognosis in myeloid malignancies such as MDS. More recently, EZH2 inactivation was shown to induce chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Göllner et al., 2017). Data on the frequency and prognostic role of EZH2-mutations in AML are rare and mostly confined to smaller cohorts. To investigate the prevalence and prognostic impact of this alteration in more detail, we analyzed a large cohort of AML patients (n = 1604) for EZH2 mutations. Patients and Methods: All patients analyzed had newly diagnosed AML, were registered in clinical protocols of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) (AML96, AML2003 or AML60+, SORAML) and had available material at diagnosis. Screening for EZH2 mutations and associated alterations was done using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) (TruSight Myeloid Sequencing Panel, Illumina) on an Illumina MiSeq-system using bone marrow or peripheral blood. Detection was conducted with a defined cut-off of 5% variant allele frequency (VAF). All samples below the predefined threshold were classified as EZH2 wild type (wt). Patient clinical characteristics and co-mutations were analyzed according to the mutational status. Furthermore, multivariate analysis was used to identify the impact of EZH2 mutations on outcome. Results: EZH2-mutations were found in 63 of 1604 (4%) patients, with a median VAF of 44% (range 6-97%; median coverage 3077x). Mutations were detected within several exons (2-6; 8-12; 14-20) with highest frequencies in exons 17 and 18 (29%). The majority of detected mutations (71% missense and 29% nonsense/frameshift) were single nucleotide variants (SNVs) (87%), followed by small indel mutations. Descriptive statistics of clinical parameters and associated co-mutations revealed significant differences between EZH2-mut and -wt patients. At diagnosis, patients with EZH2 mutations were significantly older (median age 59 yrs) than EZH2-wt patients (median 56 yrs; p=0.044). In addition, significantly fewer EZH2-mut patients (71%) were diagnosed with de novo AML compared to EZH2-wt patients (84%; p=0.036). Accordingly, EZH2-mut patients had a higher rate of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) (21%), evolving from prior MDS or after prior chemotherapy (tAML) (8%; p=0.036). Also, bone marrow (and blood) blast counts differed between the two groups (EZH2-mut patients had significantly lower BM and PB blast counts; p=0.013). In contrast, no differences were observed for WBC counts, karyotype, ECOG performance status and ELN-2017 risk category compared to EZH2-wt patients. Based on cytogenetics according to the 2017 ELN criteria, 35% of EZH2-mut patients were categorized with favorable risk, 28% had intermediate and 37% adverse risk. No association was seen with -7/7q-. In the group of EZH2-mut AML patients, significantly higher rates of co-mutations were detected in RUNX1 (25%), ASXL1 (22%) and NRAS (25%) compared to EZH2-wt patients (with 10%; 8% and 15%, respectively). Vice versa, concomitant mutations in NPM1 were (non-significantly) more common in EZH2-wt patients (33%) vs EZH2-mut patients (21%). For other frequently mutated genes in AML there was no major difference between EZH2-mut and -wt patients, e.g. FLT3ITD (13%), FLT3TKD (10%) and CEBPA (24%), as well as genes encoding epigenetic modifiers, namely, DNMT3A (21%), IDH1/2 (11/14%), and TET2 (21%). The correlation of EZH2 mutational status with clinical outcomes showed no effect of EZH2 mutations on the rate of complete remission (CR), relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (with a median OS of 18.4 and 17.1 months for EZH2-mut and -wt patients, respectively) in the univariate analyses. Likewise, the multivariate analysis with clinical variable such as age, cytogenetics and WBC using Cox proportional hazard regression, revealed that EZH2 mutations were not an independent risk factor for OS or RFS. Conclusion EZH mutations are recurrent alterations in patients with AML. The association with certain clinical factors and typical mutations such as RUNX1 and ASXL1 points to the fact that these mutations are associated with secondary AML. Our data do not indicate that EZH2 mutations represent an independent prognostic factor. Disclosures Middeke: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rollig:Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Scholl:Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbivie: Other: Travel support; Alexion: Other: Travel support; MDS: Other: Travel support; Novartis: Other: Travel support; Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Carreras Foundation: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Brümmendorf:Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Burchert:AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Krause:Novartis: Research Funding. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Platzbecker:Celgene: Research Funding. Mayer:Eisai: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding. Serve:Bayer: Research Funding. Ehninger:Cellex Gesellschaft fuer Zellgewinnung mbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Bayer: Research Funding; GEMoaB Monoclonals GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thiede:AgenDix: Other: Ownership; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text