scholarly journals Neurotoxicity of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Long-Term Outcomes - in a Minority Rich, Ethnically Diverse Real World Cohort

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4842-4842
Author(s):  
Ryann Quinn ◽  
Astha Thakkar ◽  
Sumaira Zareef ◽  
Richard Elkind ◽  
Karen Wright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of B- cell malignancies leading to durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory disease. 1,2 One of the most severe toxicities associated with this treatment is immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), which was seen in 65-75% of patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) in initial clinical trials. ICANS can range from mild headache to coma, and can occur with or without cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Due to the recent development of CAR T-cell therapy, the long-term effects of ICANS are unknown. This study sought to determine the long-term outcomes in patients with neurotoxicity from axi-cel. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who received CAR T-cell therapy with axi-cel between June 2018 and June 2021. Neurotoxicity was graded according to the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) ICANS grading system. 3 The primary outcome was percentage of patients who had neurotoxicity defined as ICANS grade ≥ 1 as well as the percentage of patients with neurotoxicity lasting ≥ 1 month. We captured descriptive data such as age, sex, ethnicity, comorbidities, IPI score, stage, baseline neurologic dysfunction, performance status, and number of prior treatments. Secondary outcomes included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Thirty-four patients received axi-cel between June 2018 and June 2021 at our institution. Median age of patients was 65. Twenty patients (59%) were male and 14 (41%) were female. The majority of patients received axi-cel for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (97%). Study population was predominantly hispanic (35%), white (32%), African american (29%) and asian (3%). (Sixteen patients (47%) developed neurotoxicity of any grade, with 7 patients (21%) ≥ grade 3. Of note, 4 patients (12%) died during admission for CAR T-cell therapy and 3/4 deaths were in patients with ICANS ≥ grade 3. Median follow up time was 8 months. Of the 12 patients with neurotoxicity who survived initial admission for CAR-T, 9 (75%) patients recovered from neurotoxicity and mental status was at baseline at discharge without recurrence during follow up. Three (25%) of patients had prolonged neurotoxicity lasting > 1 month. Long-term neurotoxicity included confusion, disorientation, and mild cognitive impairment in the three patients. One patient recovered 15 months after CAR T-cell infusion. 2 patients had prolonged neurotoxicity resulting in deterioration of functional status and death in 1 patient, and 1 patient transitioning to hospice and being lost to follow up. Conclusions Neurotoxicity from axicabtagene ciloleucel is a common adverse event, with half of patients in our cohort having neurotoxicity of some degree, and 20% ≥ grade 3. Twenty-five percent of patients that developed neurotoxicity had long-term effects lasting > 1 month, which resulted in deterioration of functional status in 2 patients. Long-term neurotoxicity included disorientation, confusion, and memory impairment. Our study is limited by a small sample size. Larger studies with longer follow-up times are needed to further characterize the long-term outcomes of neurotoxicity associated with CAR T-cell therapy. Neurotoxicity can be confounded by other causes of neurological dysfunction in these patients such as hospital delirium, chemotherapy toxicity, encephalopathy from infection, and subtle baseline neurologic dysfunction that may not be apparent at presentation. Next steps include prospective evaluation of patients with formal neurology evaluation prior to CAR T-cell therapy and periodically after treatment, in order to objectively monitor late neurologic effects of CAR T-cell therapy. 1. Fl, L. et al. Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 20, (2019). 2. Jacobson, C. Primary Analysis of Zuma-5: A Phase 2 Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL). in (ASH, 2020). 3. Dw, L. et al. ASTCT Consensus Grading for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurologic Toxicity Associated with Immune Effector Cells. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. J. Am. Soc. Blood Marrow Transplant. 25, (2019). Disclosures Gritsman: iOnctura: Research Funding. Shastri: Onclive: Honoraria; Guidepoint: Consultancy; GLC: Consultancy; Kymera Therapeutics: Research Funding. Verma: Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Stelexis: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Curis: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Medpacto: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; Stelexis: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Incyte: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Throws Exception: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

scholarly journals Feasibility, and Efficacy of Donor-Derived cd19-Targeted Car t-Cell Therapy in Refractory/Relapsed(r/r)b-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (b-all) Patients

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Xian Zhang ◽  
Junfang Yang ◽  
Wenqian Li ◽  
Gailing Zhang ◽  
Yunchao Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Backgrounds As CAR T-cell therapy is a highly personalized therapy, process of generating autologous CAR-T cells for each patient is complex and can still be problematic, particularly for heavily pre-treated patients and patients with significant leukemia burden. Here, we analyzed the feasibility and efficacy in 37 patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) B-ALL who received CAR T-cells derived from related donors. Patients and Methods From April 2017 to May 2020, 37 R/R B-ALL patients with a median age of 19 years (3-61 years), were treated with second-generation CD19 CAR-T cells derived from donors. The data was aggregated from three clinical trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03173417; NCT02546739; and www.chictr.org.cn ChiCTR-ONC-17012829). Of the 37 patients, 28 were relapsed following allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) and whose lymphocytes were collected from their transplant donors (3 HLA matched sibling and 25 haploidentical). For the remaining 9 patients without prior transplant, the lymphocytes were collected from HLA identical sibling donors (n=5) or haploidentical donors (n=4) because CAR-T cells manufacture from patient samples either failed (n=5) or blasts in peripheral blood were too high (>40%) to collect quality T-cells. The median CAR-T cell dose infused was 3×105/kg (1-30×105/kg). Results For the 28 patients who relapsed after prior allo-HSCT, 27 (96.4%) achieved CR within 30 days post CAR T-cell infusion, of which 25 (89.3%) were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative. Within one month following CAR T-cell therapy, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 3 patients including 1 with rash and 2 with diarrhea. A total of 19 of the 28 (67.9%) patients had cytokine release syndrome (CRS), including two patients (7.1%) with Grade 3-4 CRS. Four patients had CAR T-cell related neurotoxicity including 3 with Grade 3-4 events. With a medium follow up of 103 days (1-669days), the median overall survival (OS) was 169 days (1-668 days), and the median leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 158 days (1-438 days). After CAR T-cell therapy, 15 patients bridged into a second allo-HSCT and one of 15 patients (6.7%) relapsed following transplant, and two died from infection. There were 11 patients that did not receive a second transplantation, of which three patients (27.3%) relapsed, and four parents died (one due to relapse, one from arrhythmia and two from GVHD/infection). Two patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining nine patients had no prior transplantation. At the time of T-cell collection, the median bone marrow blasts were 90% (range: 18.5%-98.5%), and the median peripheral blood blasts were 10% (range: 0-70%). CR rate within 30 days post CAR-T was 44.4% (4/9 cases). Six patients developed CRS, including four with Grade 3 CRS. Only one patient had Grade 3 neurotoxicity. No GVHD occurred following CAR T-cell therapy. Among the nine patients, five were treated with CAR T-cells derived from HLA-identical sibling donors and three of those five patients achieved CR. One patient who achieved a CR died from disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) on day 16. Two patients who achieved a CR bridged into allo-HSCT, including one patient who relapsed and died. One of two patients who did not response to CAR T-cell therapy died from leukemia. Four of the nine patients were treated with CAR T-cells derived from haploidentical related donors. One of the four cases achieved a CR but died from infection on day 90. The other three patients who had no response to CAR T-cell therapy died from disease progression within 3 months (7-90 days). Altogether, seven of the nine patients died with a median time of 19 days (7-505 days). Conclusions We find that manufacturing CD19+ CAR-T cells derived from donors is feasible. For patients who relapse following allo-HSCT, the transplant donor derived CAR-T cells are safe and effective with a CR rate as high as 96.4%. If a patient did not have GVHD prior to CAR T-cell therapy, the incidence of GVHD following CAR T-cell was low. Among patients without a history of transplantation, an inability to collect autologous lymphocytes signaled that the patient's condition had already reached a very advanced stage. However, CAR T-cells derived from HLA identical siblings can still be considered in our experience, no GVHD occurred in these patients. But the efficacy of CAR T-cells from haploidentical donors was very poor. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Fever Characteristics Associated with Toxicity and Outcome after Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy for Aggressive Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1612-1612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamza Hashmi ◽  
Alicia Darwin ◽  
Christina A Bachmeier ◽  
Julio Chavez ◽  
Bijal Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Fever is a cardinal symptom of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) after CAR T-cell therapy with 84% of patients experiencing fever on the ZUMA-1 trial of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). Knowledge of the patterns of fever and associated symptoms may inform the clinical management of these patients. Methods: We performed a single center retrospective study in 78 patients receiving axi-cel for large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) as of 12/31/2018. We evaluated all the patients who developed fever during lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine (Flu) and cyclophosphamide (Cy), after CAR T-cell infusion, and after administration of tocilizumab (toci); and analyzed the association of fever with toxicity rates (grade 3+ CRS and neurotoxicity) and efficacy [overall response rates (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate 6 months post CAR T-cell infusion]. Fever was defined per the Lee criteria [equal to or greater than 38 °C], CRS used the modified Lee criteria and neurotoxicity used the CARTOX grading system. Results: Fever occurred in 71/78 (91%) of patients. Rates of grade 3+ CRS and neurotoxicity were 9% (7/78) and 26% (20/78) respectively. The CR rate at 6 months was 41% (32/78). Toxicities and outcomes in patients with the described fever characteristics are shown in the Table. During lymphodepletion with Flu/Cy, fever was observed in 11% (9/78) of patients. Fever occurred within 24 hours of axi-cel infusion in 47% (37/78) and within 72 hours of axi-cel infusion in 71% (55/78) of the patients. In total, 41% (32/78) of patients were treated with anti-IL6R therapy (tocilizumab; toci) for CAR T toxicity. After the first dose of toci, fever recurred in 69% of patients (22/32), of which 34% (11/32) experienced fever recurrence within 24 hours of toci infusion. Conclusions: This is the first study to our knowledge that describes in detail the characteristics of fever after CAR T-cell therapy with axi-cel. Fever was common and occurred in 71% of the patients within 72 hours of axi-cel infusion. When toci was used, fever recurred in a majority of patients (69%) and in 1/3 of patients the fever recurred within 24 hours of toci infusion. These descriptive data may be used by clinicians to inform their expectations of fever occurring after treatment with axi-cel and/or toci. Table Disclosures Bachmeier: Kite/Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Chavez:Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Shah:AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Pinilla Ibarz:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Nishihori:Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Lazaryan:Kadmon: Consultancy. Davila:Bellicum: Consultancy; Anixa: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Atara: Research Funding. Locke:Cellular BioMedicine Group Inc.: Consultancy; Kite: Other: Scientific Advisor; Novartis: Other: Scientific Advisor. Jain:Kite/Gilead: Consultancy.

Long-Term Follow-Up of CD19-CAR T-Cell Therapy in Children and Young Adults With B-ALL

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.02262
Author(s):  
Nirali N. Shah ◽  
Daniel W. Lee ◽  
Bonnie Yates ◽  
Constance M. Yuan ◽  
Haneen Shalabi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

PURPOSE CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CD19-CAR) T cells induce high response rates in children and young adults (CAYAs) with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but relapse rates are high. The role for allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (alloHSCT) following CD19-CAR T-cell therapy to improve long-term outcomes in CAYAs has not been examined. METHODS We conducted a phase I trial of autologous CD19.28ζ-CAR T cells in CAYAs with relapsed or refractory B-ALL. Response and long-term clinical outcomes were assessed in relation to disease and treatment variables. RESULTS Fifty CAYAs with B-ALL were treated (median age, 13.5 years; range, 4.3-30.4). Thirty-one (62.0%) patients achieved a complete remission (CR), 28 (90.3%) of whom were minimal residual disease−negative by flow cytometry. Utilization of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide–based lymphodepletion was associated with improved CR rates (29/42, 69%) compared with non–fludarabine/cyclophosphamide–based lymphodepletion (2/8, 25%; P = .041). With median follow-up of 4.8 years, median overall survival was 10.5 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 29.2 months). Twenty-one of 28 (75.0%) patients achieving a minimal residual disease−negative CR proceeded to alloHSCT. For those proceeding to alloHSCT, median overall survival was 70.2 months (95% CI, 10.4 months to not estimable). The cumulative incidence of relapse after alloHSCT was 9.5% (95% CI, 1.5 to 26.8) at 24 months; 5-year EFS following alloHSCT was 61.9% (95% CI, 38.1 to 78.8). CONCLUSION We provide the longest follow-up in CAYAs with B-ALL after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy reported to date and demonstrate that sequential therapy with CD19.28ζ-CAR T cells followed by alloHSCT can mediate durable disease control in a sizable fraction of CAYAs with relapsed or refractory B-ALL (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01593696 ).

Long-Term Follow-up of a Phase 1, First-in-Human Open-Label Study of LCAR-B38M, a Structurally Differentiated Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) Cell Therapy Targeting B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA), in Patients (pts) with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 579-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bai-Yan Wang ◽  
Wan-Hong Zhao ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Yin-Xia Chen ◽  
Xing-Mei Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Grade 3

Background: In RRMM, the median overall survival (OS) of pts with RRMM who progressed after exposure to ≥3 prior therapies is ~13 mo, indicating a high unmet need. LCAR-B38M is a structurally differentiated CAR-T cell therapy containing a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain and 2 BCMA-targeting single-domain antibodies designed to confer avidity. Earlier results from LEGEND-2 (NCT03090659), a first-in-human phase 1 study using LCAR-B38M CAR-T cells in 74 pts with RRMM conducted in 4 hospitals in China (Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital; Ruijin Hospital; Changzheng Hospital; and the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University), showed encouraging efficacy and manageable safety. Key eligibility criteria included RRMM with ≥3 prior lines of therapy. Here, we present long-term follow-up data on safety and efficacy from the Xi'an site. Methods: In the Xi'an site-specific protocol (n=57), lymphodepletion was performed using cyclophosphamide (Cy; 300 mg/m2)alone for 3 days. LCAR-B38M (median CAR+ T cells, 0.5×106 cells/kg; range, 0.07-2.1 × 106) was infused in 3 split infusions. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of LCAR-B38M; the secondary objective was to evaluate anti-myeloma response of treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the NCI-CTCAE v4.03, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was assessed per Lee et al. 2014, and response was evaluated using IMWG criteria. Results: As of the 12/31/18 cutoff date (median follow-up, 19 mo; 95% confidence interval [CI], 17-22), enrollment at Xi'an is complete, and 57 pts have been infused with LCAR-B38M. AEs were reported by all pts: pyrexia (91%), CRS (90%), thrombocytopenia (49%), and leukopenia (47%). Grade ≥3 AEs were reported by 65% of pts: leukopenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (23%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (21%). CRS was mostly grade 1 (47%) and 2 (35%); 4 pts (7%) had grade 3 events; no grade 4/5 CRS was observed. Neurotoxicity was observed in 1 pt (grade 1 aphasia, agitation, seizure-like activity). The median time to onset of CRS was 9 days (range, 1-19) with a median duration of 9 days (range, 3-57); all but 1 CRS events resolved. Peak levels of LCAR-B38M (≥1x104 copies/µg genomic DNA) were observed in a majority of pts with blood samples for analysis (n=32). LCAR-B38M was not detectable in peripheral blood in 71% of pts at 4 mo; 5 pts showed CAR-T cell persistence for up to 10 months. The overall response rate (partial response [PR] or better) was 88% (95% CI, 76-95), complete response (CR) was achieved by 42 pts (74%; 60-85), very good partial response (VGPR) by 2 pts (4%; 0.4-12), and PR by 6 pts (11%; 4-22). Of pts with CR, 39/42 were minimal residual disease negative (MRD-neg, 8-color flow cytometry). The median time to first response was 1.2 mo. There was no relationship between best response and baseline BCMA expression level or weight-adjusted CAR+ cells infused (Fig 1a,b). At cutoff, the median follow-up was 19 mo [17-22]. Median OS has not yet been reached. The OS rate at 18 mo was 68% (54─79) with a median duration of response (mDOR) of 22 mo (13-29). Of MRD-neg pts with CR, 91% (75-97) are still alive at data cut, with a 27 mo (16-NE) mDOR. Overall, 26 (46%) of 57 all-treated pts and 25 (64%) of 39 MRD-neg pts with CR remain progression-free. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all-treated pts was 20 mo (10-28); median PFS for MRD-neg pts with CR was 28 mo (20-31). At 18 months, the PFS rate was 50% (36-63) for all pts and 71% (52-84) for MRD-neg pts with CR. Factors contributing to long-term response are shown in Fig 1c,d. Seventeen pts died during the study and the follow-up period: progressive disease (PD; n=11), disease relapse, PD + lung infection, suicide after PD, esophageal carcinoma, infection, and pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndrome (n=1 each). Of these, 4 did not achieve PR or better; 1 was not evaluable. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that LCAR-B38M is a highly effective therapy for RRMM, regardless of baseline BCMA expression. LCAR-B38M displayed a manageable safety profile consistent with its known mechanism of action and, with a median follow-up of 19 months, demonstrated deep and durable responses in pts with RRMM. A phase 1b/2 clinical study is ongoing in the United States (CARTITUDE-1, NCT03548207, JNJ-68284528), and a phase 2 confirmatory study has initiated in China (CARTIFAN-1, NCT03758417). Figure 1 Disclosures Zhuang: Nanjing Legend Biotech: Employment. Fan:Legend Biotech: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Consensus Grading of Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) in Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) Treated with Tisagenlecleucel on the JULIET Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4190-4190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Schuster ◽  
Richard T. Maziarz ◽  
Solveig G. Ericson ◽  
Elisha S. Rusch ◽  
James Signorovitch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy achieves rapid and durable responses in patients with r/r DLBCL, although unique potential toxicities require specialized management. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most commonly observed adverse event of special interest associated with CAR T-cell therapy. Two CRS grading scales have been used in different clinical trials of CAR T-cell therapy: the Penn scale (Porter, Sci Transl Med, 2015; Porter, J Hematol & Oncol, 2018) and the Lee scale (Lee, Blood, 2014; Neelapu, Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2017). To better inform management of CRS and develop best practices, we assessed concordance and differences between the two scales by using the Lee scale to regrade observed CRS events in r/r DLBCL patients treated with tisagenlecleucel, who were previously graded per protocol using the Penn scale. Methods: Individual patient level data from the JULIET trial, a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, global phase 2 trial of tisagenlecleucel in adult patients with r/r DLBCL (NCT02445248), were used in this study. Four medical experts who had managed DLBCL patients using different CAR T-cell therapy protocols and products independently reviewed the data, while blinded to the original Penn grading, and re-graded CRS for JULIET patients using the Lee scale. Re-grading assessments and disagreements in the assigned Lee grade were discussed and reconciled among reviewers during a live meeting. As per the investigational charter, the most conservative final assessment of any expert reviewer determined the final grading for any individual case. For example, if an event was graded as 2, 3, 3 and 4, then grade 4 would be the final grading. Results: As of December. 8, 2017, 111 patients with r/r DLBCL were infused with tisagenlecleucel in the JULIET trial. Sixty-four (58%) patients had CRS graded according to the Penn scale and each case was re-graded using the Lee scale based on JULIET data collected prospectively (e.g., CRS-related symptoms, oxygen supplementation, intervention for hypotension, and organ toxicities). Using the Lee scale, 63 (57%) patients were considered to have any grade CRS by investigators, including grade 1 events in 26 (23%), grade 2 in 18 (16%), grade 3 in 10 (9%), and grade 4 in 9 (8%) (Figure 1). One patient with grade 1 per Penn scale was re-graded to grade 0 due to absence of documented fever or symptoms requiring intervention. Compared to Penn grades, the Lee scale provided the same grade for 39 patients, a lower grade for 20 patients, and a higher grade for 5 patients. Among 64 patients re-graded, 59 (92%) had fever, 27 (42%) had oxygen supplementation (3 with grade 1, 6 grade 2, 9 grade 3, and 9 grade 4 per Lee scale) and 7 (11%) had concurrent infections. Of 29 (45%) patients requiring intervention for hypotension (13 with grade 2, 7 grade 3, and 9 grade 4 per Lee scale), 28 had fluid resuscitation and 10 received high dose/combination vasopressors. In addition, 8 of 9 patients re-graded as Lee grade 4 were intubated. As for anti-cytokine therapy, only 17 patients received tocilizumab (1 for grade 1, 2 for grade 2, 5 for grade 3, and 9 for grade 4 CRS per Lee scale) and 12 patients received corticosteroids (2 for grade 2, 1 for grade 3, and 9 for grade 4 CRS per Lee scale). Conclusions: Different CAR-T studies in DLBCL patients have used different approaches (Lee and Penn scales) for grading CRS and had different thresholds for tocilizumab treatment of CRS. Harmonization of grading CRS between studies permits a more accurate comparison of observations and outcomes. In this analysis, patients with r/r DLBCL receiving tisagenlecleucel in the JULIET trial, which used the Penn scale to grade CRS, were re-graded by expert consensus using the Lee scale. Using the Lee scale, more patients were categorized as grade 1 (Lee vs. Penn: 26 vs. 17), fewer patients as grades 2 and 3 (18 vs. 23, and 10 vs. 15, respectively), and the same number of patients as grade 4 (9 vs. 9) compared to the Penn scale. The re-grading of the JULIET CRS data using the Lee scale makes it possible to perform comparative analyses of CRS outcomes from clinical trials using different CAR-T products and could be used to develop best practice guidelines. Disclosures Schuster: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; OncLive: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Physician's Education Source, LLC: Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Maziarz:Athersys, Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Kite Therapeutics: Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ericson:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Rusch:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Romanov:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Locke:Cellular BioMedicine Group Inc.: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Scientific Advisor; Kite Pharma: Other: Scientific Advisor. Maloney:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals JS1.4 Neurological follow-up of neurotoxicity after CAR T cell therapy in lymphoma patients: A French neurological multi-center survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii5-iii5
Author(s):  
C Belin ◽  
C Simard ◽  
A Dos Santos ◽  
X Ayrignac ◽  
C Berger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Transverse Myelitis ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR T) cell therapy is a highly promising treatment for haematological malignancies but is frequently associated with cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. The physiopathological mechanisms of neurological complications and their links with CRS remain largely unknown. The aims of this study are: a) to follow-up longitudinally patients treated with CAR-T cell therapy; b) to exhaustively identify neurological signs and symptoms and; c) to describe their occurrence over time. MATERIAL AND METHODS Since September 2018, all patients treated with CD19-targeted CAR T cell therapy for relapsing lymphoma were systematically followed-up and monitored for signs of neurotoxicity by a neurologist. Five different centres (Paris-Saint-Louis, Nantes, Lyon, Montpellier, and Rennes) participated in this study. RESULTS As of April 1st 2019, 57 patients, mean age 49 years (range from 22 to 72 years, median age 50 years), 22 females / 35 males, all treated for lymphoma, were included in this study Neurotoxicity, defined as the presence of at least one neurological sign or symptoms appearing after treatment infusion, was present in 33 % of patients. The median time to onset was 7.5 days after infusion with a median duration of symptoms of 5 days. Neurological symptoms were: Encephalopathy (52%), cerebellar syndrome (26%), aphasia (15%), agraphia (15%), executive syndrome (10%), myoclonus (10%), dysarthria (10%), meningismus (5%), transverse myelitis (5%), seizure (5%), neuralgia (5%), and dysesthesia (5%). The severity grade of neurotoxicity was grade 4: 2 patients, Grade 3: 7 patients, grade 2: 5 patients and grade 1: 5 patients (CTCAE grading). CRS was observed in 75% of patients. All patients who developed neurological disorders also had CRS (grade 1: 68%, grade 2: 10%, grade 3: 15%, grade 4: 5%) that preceded neurotoxicity. As the study is still ongoing, updated results will be presented at the EANO meeting. CONCLUSION Neurotoxicity associated with CAR-T therapies occurs in one third of patients. This high frequency underlines the need: 1 - to neurologically assess all patients before and repeatedly after therapy infusions; 2 - to provide guidelines for neurological assessment and relevant investigations to improve early recognition of neurotoxicity and its management

scholarly journals Association of Bridging Therapy Utilization with Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4100-4100
Author(s):  
P. Connor Johnson ◽  
Caron Jacobson ◽  
Alisha Yi ◽  
Areej El-Jawahri ◽  
Matthew J. Frigault
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bridging Therapy ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: CAR T-cell therapy has altered the landscape of treatment options for patients with hematologic malignancies. Because CAR T-cell therapy involves manufacturing an autologous cellular product over a period of weeks, patients can receive bridging therapy while awaiting CAR T-cells. Currently there is no standard of care for use of bridging therapy. Moreover, data are lacking regarding the impact of bridging therapy use on clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 236 patients who received CAR-T cell therapy at two tertiary care centers from 2/2016-12/2019. We abstracted clinical outcomes from review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) including 1) overall response rate (ORR); 2) complete response (CR) rate; 3) progression-free survival (PFS); 4) overall survival (OS); 5) health care utilization (length of stay [LOS], intensive care unit [ICU] admission during admission for CAR T-cell therapy, and hospital readmission within 3 months of CAR T-cell infusion); and 6) rates of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) [all grades and grade 3+]. We assessed the association of bridging therapy use with ORR, CR rate, rates of ICU admission and hospital readmission, and rates of CRS (any grade) and ICANS (any grade and grade 3+) using the chi square test. We assessed the association of bridging therapy use with LOS using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test given the distribution of LOS and with grade 3+ CRS using Fisher's Exact Test given the sample size of this outcome. To assess the association of bridging therapy use with PFS and OS, we used Cox multivariable regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, marital status, Charlson comorbidity index, lymphoma diagnosis, number of prior therapies, history of autologous stem cell transplant, time from relapse to CAR T-cell therapy, vein to vein time, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (closest to day 0), LDH (> 500 vs <=500), CRP, ferritin, and platelet count (< 100 vs >=100) prior to CAR T-cell infusion, CAR T-cell product, total dose of steroids received (days 0-31), and receipt of tocilizumab. Results: Patients had a median age of 62.8 years (range: 19-82) and the majority were male (145/236, 61.4%). The most common diagnosis was de novo diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (101/236, 42.8%) and most patients received axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) (192/236, 81.4%). All patients received lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. Overall, 39.4% (93/236) received bridging therapy. Regimens utilized for bridging therapy included systemic chemotherapy (48/236, 20.3%), corticosteroids (25/236, 10.6%), radiation (10/236, 4.2%), and other systemic therapies (10/236, 4.2%). Among the entire cohort, ORR and CR rate were 85.2% (201/236) and 64.8% (153/236), respectively, and bridging therapy use was not associated with ORR (80.0% with bridging therapy vs. 88.8% without bridging therapy; χ 2=3.81; p=0.051) or CR rate (63.4% with bridging therapy vs. 65.7% without bridging therapy; χ 2=0.13; p=0.718). In univariate Cox regression analyses, bridging therapy was associated with worse PFS (HR=1.47; p=0.049) and worse OS (HR=1.85; p=0.006). In multivariable Cox regression models adjusting for covariates (Tables 1 and 2), bridging therapy use was not associated with PFS (HR=1.43; p=0.163) but was associated with worse OS (HR=2.23; p=0.006). Bridging therapy use was not associated with LOS (p=0.451), ICU admission (χ 2=0.22; p=0.638), hospital readmission (χ 2=0.95; p=0.329), CRS (all grades: χ 2=0.46; p=0.500; grades 3+: p=0.574), or ICANS (all grades: χ 2=0.13; p=0.719; grades 3+: χ 2=0.23; p=0.632). Conclusions: We identified that bridging therapy use is not associated with differences in response rates, PFS, health care utilization, or rates of CRS or ICANS but is associated with worse OS in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. These findings underscore the need for novel bridging therapy regimens to optimize outcomes in this patient population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jacobson: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Axis: Speakers Bureau; Humanigen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Nkarta: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Lonza: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau. Frigault: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arcellx: Consultancy; Iovance: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Editas: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Six-Month Follow-up for Infectious Complications after Lymphodepletion and Application of CD19-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) Cell Therapy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4835-4835
Author(s):  
Felix Korell ◽  
Maria-Luisa Schubert ◽  
Tim Sauer ◽  
Anita Schmitt ◽  
Patrick Derigs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Travel Grant

Abstract Background: In the past years, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy targeting CD19 have been shown to be a new and effective treatment option in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, infections with severe and potentially life-threatening complications can be induced by either lymphodepleting chemotherapy and/or the infusion of CAR-T cells, while side effects such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) might further complicate differential diagnosis. Methods: Infections and complications were evaluated during inpatient treatment as well as in a follow-up period of the first six months after dosing. Eighty-one dosings of CAR-T cells in seventy-three adult patients with either NHL (88%) or ALL (12%) were analyzed. Bacterial and viral pathogen were detected with blood cultures or examination of potential sources of infection such as catheter tips. Panel and serum testing for viral infection was carried out either as a screening or in case of suspicion, while fungal infections were diagnosed according to the 2008 revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Consensus Group criteria to determine proven, probable and possible invasive fungal disease. Results: In 52 patients (64%, Table 1) fever was detected following lymphodepletion and CAR-T cell dosing . Microbiological or radiological findings were seen in 20% of cases. Of those, eight were of bacterial (10%), three of viral (4%), and five of fungal (6%) origin. Overall, more lines of therapy as well as more severe CRS were associated with early infection. Cytokine release syndrome was diagnosed in 41 patients (51%, Table 1), with a simultaneous detection in five bacterial (6%), two viral (2%), and five fungal (6%) infections (Figure 1). In the six months follow-up period seven patients with fever (9%) had microbiological or radiological findings, in most cases during the first 90 days after CAR T cell infusion (6 patients, 7%). Only one patient died of infection (pathogen: cytomegalovirus). Conclusions: Infections are common in CAR-T cell patients; therefore, fast and suitable identification and initiation of treatment are important in the heavily pretreated and immunocompromised patient population. While infectious complications are mostly manageable, the frequency of infectious complications in patients receiving CAR-T cell therapy underlines the value of standardized anti-infective prophylaxis and supportive therapy for reduction of morbidity and mortality. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Schubert: Gilead: Consultancy. Sauer: Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Matterhorn Biosciences AG: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member. Schmitt: Hexal: Other: Travel grant; TolerogenixX Ltd: Current Employment; Therakos/Mallinckrodt: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel grant. Müller-Tidow: Bioline: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dreger: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Schmitt: Bluebird Bio: Other: Travel grants; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Hexal: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Kite Gilead: Other: Travel grants; Apogenix: Research Funding; TolerogenixX: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.

scholarly journals Late Effects of CD19-Targeted CAR-T Cell Therapy

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 223-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cordeiro ◽  
Evandro D Bezerra ◽  
Joshua Aiden Hill ◽  
Cameron J. Turtle ◽  
David G. Maloney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

Abstract Recently two CD19-targeted CAR-T cell products were approved by the FDA for treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Excellent anti-tumor activity has been observed in patients with B cell malignancies. However, data regarding long-term effects of this therapy are very limited. Here we report long-term effects in 59 patients (pts) with R/R NHL and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who received a total of 85 CD19-targeted CAR-T cell infusions on a clinical trial in our institution (NCT01865617), survived more than a year, and had at least one year follow-up data after their first CAR-T cell infusion. One patient who survived more than a year was excluded from this report due to incomplete data. Median follow-up was 23 months (range, 13-57) after the first CAR-T cell infusion. We report adverse events that occurred or persisted beyond 90 days after the last CAR-T cell infusion, excluding events related to disease progression. Median age at CAR-T cell infusion was 60 years (range, 34-73). There were 42 (71%) pts with NHL and 17 (29%) with CLL. The median number of prior lines of treatment was 4 (range, 1-8). 23 (39%) pts had received prior autologous (auto) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and 9 (15%) pts had received prior allogeneic (allo) HCT. 35 (59%) pts received one CAR-T cell infusion, 22 (37%) pts received 2 infusions, and 2 (3%) pts received 3 infusions. 3 (5%) pts received a maximum cell dose of 2x10(5)/kg, 40 (68%) pts received a maximum cell dose of 2x10(6)/kg, and 16 (27%) pts received a maximum cell dose of 2x10(7)/kg. 65 (76%) infusions were preceded by cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. CRS grade I/II occurred in 38 (64%) pts, and grade III in 4 (7%) pts (graded per Lee et al. Blood, 2014). No grade IV CRS was reported in this cohort. Acute neurotoxicity occurred in 20 (34%) pts. At 2 months after CAR-T cell infusion complete response (CR) was documented in 34 (58%) pts, partial response (PR) in 12 (20%) pts, and disease progression (PD) in 13 (22%) pts. During the follow-up period, another 15 (25%) pts developed PD. 29 (49%) pts received salvage therapy after CAR-T cell infusion, 8 (14%) of them received allo HCT. 5 (8%) pts received allo HCT as consolidation after CAR-T cell. 5 of 25 (20%) pts who did not receive additional therapy after last CAR-T cell infusion experienced ongoing cytopenias requiring G-CSF support, or RBC or platelet transfusions, beyond 90 days after last CAR-T cells infusion. 8 (14%) pts were diagnosed with subsequent malignancies, including 3 (5%) myelodysplasia, 4 (7%) non-melanoma skin cancer, and 1 non-invasive bladder cancer. All, but 1 patient with skin cancer, had auto or allo HCT before CAR-T cell therapy. Neuropsychiatric disorders were documented in 5 (8%) pts; including major depression, suicidal attempt, myoclonic seizures, and TIA. 5 (8%) pts experienced cardiovascular events. 4 (7%) pts developed renal dysfunction. 3 (5%) pts developed respiratory disorders. One pt had gastrointestinal bleeding. Of the 9 pts who had undergone allo HCT before CAR-T cell therapy, 1 pt (11%) developed GVHD flare. Severe hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG < 400 mg/dL) or IgG replacement beyond day 90 after last CAR-T cell infusion (and before HCT if was done) were documented in 24 (41%) pts. 54 pts were included in the infection analysis. 178 suspected infection events beyond day 90 after last CAR-T cell infusion were documented in 40 (74%) pts. Antimicrobial treatments were documented for 124 infection events. 44 (25%) of the events were microbiologically proven. The most common infections were upper (92) and lower (29) respiratory tract infections. 25 (46%) pts required hospital admission due to infections, of them 8 (15%) were admitted to the ICU. When excluding infections that occurred after salvage therapy following CAR-T cell, we identified 117 infections in 28 (52%) pts. 3 pts died of non-relapse causes (2 due to infection after allo HCT, and 1 due to duodenal ulcer and gut perforation). In conclusion, our data suggest that long-term effects of CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy are acceptable. Most effects identified in our cohort were not severe, and many may have been related to prior or subsequent therapies (e.g. HCT before or after CAR-T cell therapy, or subsequent salvage treatments). Our data is consistent with recent published data demonstrating excellent long-term disease outcome for this heavily pre-treated population. Disclosures Turtle: Juno/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Nektar Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eureka Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caribu Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maloney:Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Janssen Scientific Affairs: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Management of Patients with Aggressive B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma after Relapse from Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Single Center Real-World Experience

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 43-44
Author(s):  
Jose V. Forero ◽  
Paula A. Lengerke Diaz ◽  
Eider F. Moreno Cortes ◽  
Megan Melody ◽  
Allison C. Rosenthal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Progression Of Disease ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has changed the treatment landscape for patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). Despite the excellent responses in relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive NHL (aNHL), the outcome of patients (pts) that fail CAR T-cell therapy remains poor, and there is not a clear path for management of their disease. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of aNHL pts treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) at the Mayo Clinic campuses in Arizona and Florida between June 2018 and August 2020. We evaluated the predisposing factors, management, toxicities, and response after CAR T-cell therapy failure. Statistical calculations using parametric tests were performed, and survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared statistically using the log-rank test and Pearson's correlation. Results: Thirty-four pts with aNHL received axi-cel. The median age was 53 years [IQR 42-63], and 62% were male. All pts received inpatient axi-cel infusions and the median length of hospital stay was 14 days (IQR: 11-17). Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) was observed in 91% of pts (3% grade ≥3), while Immune Effector Cell Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) was observed in 41% (24% grade ≥3). At day 30 response assessment, 16 pts (47%) had complete responses (CR), 9 (26%) had a partial response (PR), 4 (12%) had stable disease (SD), 4 (12%) showed progression with primary refractory disease (PD) and 1 (3%) died before assessment due to grade 5 ICANS (Table 1). After a median follow-up of 178 days, we observed PD in 12 (35%) pts. The median time-to-progression was 72 days (IQR 58-93) and most of the pts (83%) progressed during the first 3 months. None of the patients with more than 5 months of sustained response developed progression of disease. The likelihood of progression during the first 6 months after axi-cel infusion was 19%, 57%, 50% for pts that initially achieved a CR, PR, SD, respectively. Expression of CD19 was observed in 66% (4/6) of pts with available biopsies after axi-cel suggesting a failure mechanism other than antigen escape. The mortality rate of the R/R aNHL group was 58% with a median survival time of 83 days (IQR: 50-109). There was no association between age, stage, number of previous therapies, time from previous therapy to axi-cel infusion, time from apheresis to infusion, use of tocilizumab, or steroids with progression of disease. Of note, no correlation between CRS or ICANS with progression of disease was found (2-way ANOVA test F (1, 4) = 3.802, p=0.1230). Maintaining a response to axi-cel treatment (CR, PR, or SD) for ≥ 3 months was a strong predictor of durable response with an HR of 0.05 (p= <0.0001). Eleven R/R pts received subsequent therapies with a median time to retreatment of 76 days. Those treatments included: Radiotherapy (n=7), pembrolizumab (n=3), polatuzumab-rituximab with (n=3) and without (n=1) bendamustine, obinutuzumab with (n=1) or without (n=1) lenalidomide, Hyper-CVAD (n=2), R-GemOx (n=1), rituximab with lenalidomide (n=1) and intrathecal methotrexate (n=1). Only 2 (17%) patients have responded to salvage therapy achieving PR (one patient treated with radiotherapy and the other with rituximab-lenalidomide after two other salvage therapies). Conclusion: Our experience demonstrates the majority of aNHL patients respond to axi-cel. If patients maintain their response for more than 3 months, the likelihood of progression is very low - 15%. Similar to what has been previously reported in the literature, our series showed that 35% of patients progressed after axi-cel, and subsequently have a poor prognosis with median survival after a relapse of only 83 days (IQR: 50-109). Therapy options following axi-cel were limited due to severe cytopenias, only 2 of 11 patients have responded to salvage therapy, suggesting that conventional treatments are probably not effective/safe in this high-risk group of patients. Interestingly, the majority of R/R pts with available biopsies showed persistent CD19 expression suggesting that CAR T-cell exhaustion, poor in vivo expansion, and inhibitory signals of the tumor microenvironment may contribute to resistance. Additional strategies for monitoring of axi-cel persistence and its immunophenotypic profile could be helpful for prognosis and management of CAR T-cell pts receiving axi-cel. Disclosures Kharfan-Dabaja: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Castro:Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document