scholarly journals Bendamustine-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Heavily Pretreated Multiple Myeloma: Old PLUS New Drugs in NOVEL Agents' Era

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5021-5021
Author(s):  
Claudio Cerchione ◽  
Lucio Catalano ◽  
Davide Nappi ◽  
Anna Emanuele Pareto ◽  
Fabrizio Pane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Real Life ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Impressive Result ◽  
Significant Efficacy ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
D 20

Abstract Bendamustine is an old bi-functional alkylating agent which has proved to be effective in relapsed, refractory and in new diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM). Thus, aiming to provide further insights in this field, also in novel agents'era, we present here a retrospective, real-life analysis of patients with relapsed/refractory MM (rrMM), who had received salvage therapy with bendamustine in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (BVD) 81 patients (44 M/37 F), with rrMM, median age at diagnosis 59.4 years (r. 36-82), median age at start of treatment 63.6 years (r.37-86) treated with several lines of treatments (median 6, r. 2-11), every refractory to all the drugs previously received (also Bortezomib), received BVD (B 90 mg/sqm days 1,2; V 1.3 mg/sqm days 1,4,8,11, D 20 mg days 1,2,4,5,8,9,11,12, Pegfilgrastim day +4) every 28 days, until progression. All patients had previously received bortezomib-based and IMIDs-based treatments, and 32% (26/81) had also received radiotherapy. 69% (56/81) had undergone single or double autologous and three (2%) allogeneic stem cell transplant. All patients were relapsed and refractory to last therapies received before BVD. Bendamustine was well tolerated, with grade 3-4 transfusion-dependent anemia in 56% (46/81) of patients, and 43% (35/81) grade 3-4 neutropenia (no ospedalization was required, no septic shocks were observed). No severe extrahematologic toxicity was observed, only grade 1 gastrointestinal side effect (nausea), treated by common antiemetic drugs. According to IMWG, ORR was 63% (51/81: 7 CR, 18 VGPR, 15 PR, 11 MR) with 11 PD and 19 patients in SD, which can be considered as an impressive result in this subset of rrMM patients. In particular, for 11 patients, BVD was, after having achieved at least a PR, a bridge to second auSCT, and for two patients a bridge to alloSCT. Eight patients have surprisingly achieved a notable PR after failure of novel agents (i.e. Carfilzomib, Daratumumab and Pomalidomide). Median time to response was 1.3 months (r.1-3), median OS from diagnosis was 67.3 months (r.6-151), median OS from start of Bendamustine was 9.6 months (r.2-36). The triplet Bendamustine-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone has shown significant efficacy in a particularly severe setting of patients, relapsed and refractory to all available therapeutic resources, and, in particular cases, it could be considered as a bridge to a second autologous or allogenic SCT, also after failure of novel agents. Disclosures Martinelli: Abbvie: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Daichii Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene /BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Bendamustine-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone (BVD) in Heavily Pretreated Multiple Myeloma: Old/New in NOVEL Agents' Era

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2-3
Author(s):  
Claudio Cerchione ◽  
Lucio Catalano ◽  
Davide Nappi ◽  
Stefano Rocco ◽  
Salvatore Palmieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Antiemetic Drugs ◽  
Impressive Result ◽  
Significant Efficacy ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
D 20

Introduction Bendamustine is an old bi-functional alkylating agent which has proved to be effective in relapsed, refractory and in new diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM). Aims Thus, aiming to provide further insights in this field, also in novel agents'era, we present here a retrospective, real-life analysis of patients with relapsed/refractory MM (rrMM), who had received salvage therapy with bendamustine in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (BVD). Methods. 81 patients (44 M/37 F), with rrMM, median age at diagnosis 59.4 years (r. 36-82), median age at start of treatment 63.6 years (r.37-86) treated with several lines of treatments (median 6, r. 2-11), every refractory to all the drugs previously received (also Bortezomib), received BVD (B 90 mg/sqm days 1,2; V 1.3 mg/sqm days 1,4,8,11, D 20 mg days 1,2,4,5,8,9,11,12, Pegfilgrastim day +4) every 28 days, until progression. All patients had previously received bortezomib-based and IMIDs-based treatments, and 32% (26/81) had also received radiotherapy. 69% (56/81) had undergone single or double autologous and three (2%) allogeneic stem cell transplant. All patients were relapsed and refractory to last therapies received before BVD. Results Bendamustine was well tolerated, with grade 3-4 transfusion-dependent anemia in 56% (46/81) of patients, and 43% (35/81) grade 3-4 neutropenia (no ospedalization was required, no septic shocks were observed). No severe extrahematologic toxicity was observed, only grade 1 gastrointestinal side effect (nausea), treated by common antiemetic drugs. According to IMWG, ORR was 63% (51/81: 7 CR, 18 VGPR, 15 PR, 11 MR) with 11 PD and 19 patients in SD, which can be considered as an impressive result in this subset of rrMM patients. In particular, for 11 patients, BVD was, after having achieved at least a PR, a bridge to second auSCT, and for two patients a bridge to alloSCT. Eight patients have surprisingly achieved a notable PR after failure of novel agents (i.e. Carfilzomib, Daratumumab and Pomalidomide). Median time to response was 1.3 months (r.1-3), median OS from diagnosis was 67.3 months (r.6-151), median OS from start of Bendamustine was 9.6 months (r.2-36). Conclusions The triplet Bendamustine-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone has shown significant efficacy in a particularly severe setting of patients, relapsed and refractory to all available therapeutic resources, and, in particular cases, it could be considered as a bridge to a second autologous or allogenic SCT, also after failure of novel agents. Disclosures Lucchesi: Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria.

Bendamustine-bortezomib-dexamethasone (BVD) in heavily pretreated multiple myeloma: Old/new in novel agents' era.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20517-e20517
Author(s):  
Claudio Cerchione ◽  
Lucio Catalano ◽  
Davide Nappi ◽  
Anna Emanuele Pareto ◽  
Fabrizio Pane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Antiemetic Drugs ◽  
Impressive Result ◽  
Significant Efficacy ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
D 20

e20517 Background: Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent, with low toxicity, proved to be effective in relapsed, refractory and in new diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM). In this retrospective study, It has been evaluated efficacy and tolerance of Bendamustine, in combination with bortezomib-dexamethasone (BVD) in patients with relapsed and refractory MM (rrMM), whose prognosis is particularly severe. A retrospective real-life analysis of patients with rrMM who had been treated with BVD as salvage therapy has been performed. Methods: 56 patients (31 M/25 F), with rrMM, median age at diagnosis 57.3 years (r. 36-82), median age at start of treatment 61.8 years (r.37-83) treated with several lines of treatments (median 6, r. 2-11), every refractory to all the drugs previously received (also Bortezomib), received BVD (B 90 mg/sqm days 1,2; V 1.3 mg/sqm days 1,4,8,11, D 20 mg days 1,2,4,5,8,9,11,12, Pegfilgrastim day +4) every 28 days, until progression. All patients had previously been treated with schedule containing bortezomib and IMIDs, and 30% had also received radiotherapy. 67%of them had undergone at least to a single auSCT. All patients were relapsed and refractory to last therapies received before BVD. Results: Bendamustine was well tolerated, with grade 3 transfusion-dependent anemia in 41% of patients, and 37% grade 3 neutropenia (no ospedalization was required, no septic shocks were observed). No severe extrahematologic toxicity was observed, only grade 1 gastrointestinal side effect (nausea), treated by common antiemetic drugs. According to IMWG, after a median follow-up of 14 months (r.2-36), ORR was 64% (36/56: 4 CR, 7 VGPR, 16 PR, 9 MR) with 8 PD and 12 patients in SD, which can be considered as an impressive result in this subset of rrMM patients. In particular, for 11 patients, BVD was, after having achieved at least a PR, a bridge to second auSCT, and for two patients a bridge to alloSCT. Three patients have shown a notable PR after failure of novel agents (i.e. Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide). Median time to response was 1.2 months (r.1-3), median OS from diagnosis was 62.7 months (r.6-151), median OS from start of Bendamustine was 9.8 months (r.2-36). Conclusions: The triplet Bendamustine-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone has shown significant efficacy in a particularly severe setting of patients, relapsed and refractory to all available therapeutic resources, and, in particular cases, it could be considered as a bridge to a second autologous or allogenic SCT.

scholarly journals Bendamustine-Bortezomib-Desametasone (BVD) in the Management of Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma : A REAL-Life Experience

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5713-5713
Author(s):  
Claudio Cerchione ◽  
Lucio Catalano ◽  
Anna Emanuele Pareto ◽  
Santina Basile ◽  
Luana Marano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Antiemetic Drugs ◽  
Impressive Result ◽  
Significant Efficacy ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction : Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent, with low toxicity, proved to be effective in relapsed, refractory and in new diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM). It has been evaluated efficacy and tolerance of Bendamustine, in combination with bortezomib-dexamethasone (BVD) in patients with relapsed and refractory MM (rrMM), whose prognosis is particularly severe. A regional retrospective real-life analysis of patients with rrMM who had been treated with BVD as salvage therapy has been performed. Methods : 56 patients (31 M/25 F), with rrMM, median age at diagnosis 57.3 years (r. 36-82), median age at start of treatment 61.8 years (r.37-83) treated with several lines of treatments (median 6, r. 2-11), every refractory to all the drugs previously received (also Bortezomib), received BVD (Bendamustine 90 mg/sqm days 1,2; Bortezomib 1.3 mg/sqm days 1,4,8,11, Dexamethasone 20 mg days 1,2,4,5,8,9,11,12, Pegfilgrastim day +4) every 28 days, until progression. ISS was equally distributed, and cytogenetic was evaluable in 12 patients, and in particular one del13q and one t(11;14). All the patients had previously been treated with schedule containing bortezomib and IMIDs, and 30% had also received radiotherapy. 67% of them had undergone at least to a single auSCT. All patients were relapsed and refractory to last therapies received before BVD. Results : Bendamustine was well tolerated, with grade 3 transfusion-dependent anemia in 41% of patients, and 37% grade 3 neutropenia (no ospedalization was required, no septic shocks were observed). No severe extrahematologic toxicity was observed, only grade 1 gastrointestinal side effect (nausea), treated by common antiemetic drugs. According to IMWG, after a median follow-up of 14 months (r.2-36), ORR was 64% (36/56: 4 CR, 7 VGPR, 16 PR, 9 MR) with 8 PD and 12 patients in SD, which can be considered as an impressive result in this subset of rrMM patients. In particular, for 11 patients, BVD was, after having achieved at least a PR, a bridge to second auSCT, and for two patients a bridge to alloSCT. Median time to response was 1.2 months (range, 1-3), median OS from diagnosis was 62.7 months (range, 6-151), median OS from start of Bendamustine was 9.8 months (range 2-36). Conclusion : BVD has shown significant efficacy in a particularly severe setting of patients, relapsed and refractory to all available therapeutic resources, and, in particular cases, it could be considered as a bridge to a second autologous or allogenic SCT. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Bendamustine-Bortezomib-Desametasone (BVD) in the Management of Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma : A REAL-Life Experience

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5391-5391
Author(s):  
Claudio Cerchione ◽  
Lucio Catalano ◽  
Anna Emanuele Pareto ◽  
Santina Basile ◽  
Luana Marano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Antiemetic Drugs ◽  
Impressive Result ◽  
Significant Efficacy ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent, with low toxicity, proved to be effective in relapsed, refractory and in new diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM). It has been evaluated efficacy and tolerance of Bendamustine, in combination with bortezomib-dexametasone (BVD) in patients with relapsed and refractory MM (rrMM), whose prognosis is particularly severe. A regional retrospective real-life analysis of patients with rrMM who had been treated with BVD as salvage therapy has been performed. Methods: 35 patients (19 M/16 F), with rrMM, median age at diagnosis 57 years (r. 36-82), median age at start of treatment 62 years (r.37-83) treated with several lines of treatments (median 6, r. 2-11), every refractory to all the drugs previously received (also Bortezomib), received BVD (Bendamustine 90mg/sqm days 1,2; Bortezomib 1.3mg/sqm days 1,4,8,11, Desametasone 20mg days 1,2,4,5,8,9,11,12, Pegfilgrastim day +4) every 28 days, until progression. ISS was equally distributed, and cytogenetic was evaluable in 9 patients, and in particular one del13q and one t(11;14). All the patients had previously been treated with schedule containing bortezomib and IMIDs, 90% of them with melphalan, 77% with cyclophosphamide, 34% with antracyclines and 30% had also received radiotherapy. 58% of them had undergone at least to a single auSCT. All patients were relapsed and refractory to last therapies received before BVD. Results: Bendamustine was well tolerated, with grade 3 transfusion-dependent anemia in 29% of patients, and 41% grade 3 neutropenia (no ospedalization was required, no septic shocks were observed). No severe extrahematologic toxicity was observed, only grade 1 gastrointestinal side effect (nausea), treated by common antiemetic drugs. According to IMWG, after a median follow-up of 9 months (r.2-36), ORR was 54% (1 CR, 1 VGPR, 9 PR, 8 MR) with 7 PD and 9 patients in SD, which can be considered as an impressive result in this subset of rrMM patients. In particular, for 4 patients, BVD was, after having achieved a PR, a bridge to second auSCT, and for one patient a bridge to auSCT. Median OS from diagnosis was 61.4 months (range 6-151), median OS from start of Bendamustine was 7.2 months (range 2-36). Conclusion: BVD has shown significant efficacy (ORR 54%) in a particular severe setting of patients, relapsed and refractory to all avaiable therapeutic resources, and in particular cases it could be considered as a bridge to a second autologous or allogenic BMT. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone in the Management of Heavily Pretreated Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Claudio Cerchione ◽  
Lucio Catalano ◽  
Davide Nappi ◽  
Anna Emanuele Pareto ◽  
Gerardo Musuraca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Administration ◽  
Oral Treatment ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Good Compliance ◽  
Impressive Result ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3

Background Pomalidomide is a new generation IMID, with a very good compliance, thanks to oral administration, which can be used also in heavily pretreated patients, in a domestic setting. Aims In this retrospective observational trial, It has been evaluated efficacy and tolerance of pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (PD) as salvage regimen in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory MM (rrMM), whose prognosis is particularly severe. Methods 57 patients (31 M/26 F), with rrMM, median age at diagnosis 69 years (r. 52-86), and median age at start of treatment 76 years (r.56-90) treated with several lines of treatments (median 7, r. 2-11), every refractory to all the drugs previously received (also Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Lenalidomide), received Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone (Pomalidomide 4 mg for 21 days, Dexamethasone 40 mg days 1,8,15,22, pegfilgrastim day +8) every 28 days, until progression. ISS was equally distributed, and cytogenetic at relapse was evaluable in 14 patients. All the patients had previously been treated with schedule containing bortezomib and IMIDs. 63% (36/57) had undergone at least to a single ASCT. All patients were relapsed and refractory to last therapies received before PD. Results Pomalidomide was well tolerated, with grade 3-4 transfusion-dependent anemia in 58% (33/57) of patients, 44% (23/57) grade 3-4 neutropenia (pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis was given, no hospitalization was required, no septic shocks were observed), 40% (23/57) grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia without hemorrhagic events and transfusion-dependence. No severe extra-hematologic toxicity was observed. According to IMWG, ORR1 (≥PR) was 47.3% (27/57: 5 CR, 11 VGPR, 7 PR, 4 MR), but, considering that we are evaluating a cohort of heavily pretreated patients, with poor prognosis, another parameter should be considered, ORR2 (≥SD), considering stable disease as a successful result in progressive MM. ORR2 was 77.1% (17 SD). These can be considered as impressive result in this subset of patients. Oral treatment gives a really good compliance, in frail and unfit patients, and response, when present, is always really fast (median time to response: 2 months (r.1-6)), median OS from diagnosis was 94 months (range 21-234), median OS from start of pomalidomide was 9 months (range 1-25). Nine patients have surprisingly achieved a notable response (3 VGPR, 4 PR, 2 MR) after failure of novel agents (i.e. Carfilzomib, Daratumumab and Pomalidomide). Conclusions Pomalidomide-dexamethasone has shown significant efficacy and a very good compliance, thanks to oral administration, in a particularly severe setting of heavily pretreated patients, relapsed and refractory to all available therapeutic resources, also after failure of novel agents. Disclosures Lucchesi: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone in the Management of Heavily Pretreated Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5022-5022
Author(s):  
Claudio Cerchione ◽  
Lucio Catalano ◽  
Davide Nappi ◽  
Anna Emanuele Pareto ◽  
Fabrizio Pane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Administration ◽  
Oral Treatment ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Good Compliance ◽  
Impressive Result ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Pomalidomide is a new generation IMID, with a very good compliance, thanks to oral administration, which can be used also in heavily pretreated patients, in a domestic setting. In this retrospective observational trial, It has been evaluated efficacy and tolerance of pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (PD) as salvage regimen in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory MM (rrMM), whose prognosis is particularly severe. 57 patients (31 M/26 F), with rrMM, median age at diagnosis 69 years (r. 52-86), and median age at start of treatment 76 years (r.56-90) treated with several lines of treatments (median 7, r. 2-11), every refractory to all the drugs previously received (also Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Lenalidomide), received Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone (Pomalidomide 4 mg for 21 days, Dexamethasone 40 mg days 1,8,15,22, pegfilgrastim day +8) every 28 days, until progression. ISS was equally distributed, and cytogenetic at relapse was evaluable in 14 patients. All the patients had previously been treated with schedule containing bortezomib and IMIDs. 63% (36/57) had undergone at least to a single ASCT. All patients were relapsed and refractory to last therapies received before PD. Pomalidomide was well tolerated, with grade 3-4 transfusion-dependent anemia in 58% (33/57) of patients, 44% (23/57) grade 3-4 neutropenia (pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis was given, no hospitalization was required, no septic shocks were observed), 40% (23/57) grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia without hemorrhagic events and transfusion-dependence. No severe extra-hematologic toxicity was observed. According to IMWG, ORR1 (≥PR) was 47.3% (27/57: 5 CR, 11 VGPR, 7 PR, 4 MR), but, considering that we are evaluating a cohort of heavily pretreated patients, with poor prognosis, another parameter should be considered, ORR2 (≥SD), considering stable disease as a successful result in progressive MM. ORR2 was 77.1% (17 SD). These can be considered as impressive result in this subset of patients. Oral treatment gives a really good compliance, in frail and unfit patients, and response, when present, is always really fast (median time to response: 2 months (r.1-6)), median OS from diagnosis was 94 months (range 21-234), median OS from start of pomalidomide was 9 months (range 1-25). Nine patients have surprisingly achieved a notable response (3 VGPR, 4 PR, 2 MR) after failure of novel agents (i.e. Carfilzomib, Daratumumab and Pomalidomide). Pomalidomide-dexamethasone has shown significant efficacy and a very good compliance, thanks to oral administration, in a particularly severe setting of heavily pretreated patients, relapsed and refractory to all available therapeutic resources, also after failure of novel agents. Disclosures Martinelli: Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; Celgene /BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daichii Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone in the Management of Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Claudio Cerchione ◽  
Lucio Catalano ◽  
Davide Nappi ◽  
Gerardo Musuraca ◽  
Alessandro Lucchesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Primary Prophylaxis ◽  
Cardiac Monitoring ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Antibiotic Drugs ◽  
Impressive Result ◽  
Significant Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

Background Carfilzomib is an epoxyketone proteasome inhibitor of second generation, proved to be effective and safe in relapsed and refractory Multiple Myeloma (rrMM), in combination with dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Aims In this retrospective observational trial, it has been evaluated efficacy and safety of carfilzomib, in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) as salvage regimen in patients with rrMM, refractory to lenalidomide, where lenalidomide-based regimens have no proven efficacy. Methods 41 patients (23 M/18 F), with rrMM, median age at diagnosis 63.7 years (r. 43-82), median age at start of treatment 67 years (r. 48-84) previously treated with several lines of treatments (median 3, r. 2-11), underwent to KRD regimen (ASPIRE trial schedule) for a median treatment cycles of 8 (r 2-18). ISS was equally distributed, and all patients had previously been treated with bortezomib and IMIDs, and were refractory to this agents. 61% (19/31) of them had undergone at least to a single ASCT. Results According to IMWG criteria, after a median follow-up of 9 months (r. 2-18), ORR was 68,2% (28/41: 9 CR, 12 VGPR, 7 PR) with 5 progressive diseases (PD) and 8 patients in stable disease (SD): this can be considered as an impressive result in this subset of rrMM patients, refractory to lenalidomide. In particular, for 11 patients, KRD was, after having achieved at least a PR, a bridge to second/third autologous SCT. Median time to response was 1.3 months (r.1-4), median OS from diagnosis was 62 months (r. 9-170), median OS from start of Carfilzomib was 11 months (r. 2-18). Carfilzomib was well tolerated, with grade 2 anemia in 39%(16/41) of patients, successfully managed by ESAs, without necessity of blood transfusions; 29% (12/41) grade 3-4 neutropenia (pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis was given, no ospedalization was required, no septic shocks were observed); 34% (14/41) grade 2, 21% (9/41) grade 3 and 12% (5/41) grade 4 thrombocytopenia, without hemorrhagic events and transfusion-dependency. Moreover, it was observed pneumonia in 39% (16/41) of patients, treated by common antibiotic drugs and always solved. A cardiac monitoring was performed for all patients: hypertension (grade 2-3) in 34% (14/41) of patients; fatigue in 39% (16/31) of patients. Conclusions Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone has shown significant efficacy in a particularly severe setting of patients, relapsed and refractory to all available therapeutic resources, also lenalidomide, and it could be considered as a bridge to a second autologous or allogenic SCT. Disclosures Lucchesi: Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Martinelli:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; Daichii Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in the management of lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19522-e19522
Author(s):  
Claudio Cerchione ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Davide Nappi ◽  
Anna Emanuele Pareto ◽  
Maria Di Perna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Primary Prophylaxis ◽  
Cardiac Monitoring ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Antibiotic Drugs ◽  
Impressive Result ◽  
Hemorrhagic Events ◽  
Significant Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

e19522 Background: Carfilzomib is an epoxyketone proteasome inhibitor of second generation, proved to be effective and safe in relapsed and refractory Multiple Myeloma (rrMM), in combination with dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone. In this retrospective observational trial, it has been evaluated efficacy and safety of carfilzomib, in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) as salvage regimen in patients with rrMM, refractory to lenalidomide, whose prognosis is particularly severe. Methods: 41 patients (23 M/18 F), with rrMM, median age at diagnosis 63.7 years (r. 43-82), median age at start of treatment 67 years (r. 48-84) previously treated with several lines of treatments (median 3, r. 2-11), underwent to KRD regimen (ASPIRE trial schedule) for a median treatment cycles of 8 (r 2-18). ISS was equally distributed, and all patients had previously been treated with bortezomib and IMIDs, and were refractory to this agents. 61% (19/31) of them had undergone at least to a single ASCT. Results: According to IMWG criteria, after a median follow-up of 9 months (r. 2-18), ORR was 68,2% (28/41: 9 CR, 12 VGPR, 7 PR) with 5 progressive diseases (PD) and 8 patients in stable disease (SD): this can be considered as an impressive result in this subset of rrMM patients, refractory to lenalidomide. In particular, for 11 patients, KRD was, after having achieved at least a PR, a bridge to second/third autologous SCT. Median time to response was 1.3 months (r.1-4), median OS from diagnosis was 62 months (r. 9-170), median OS from start of Carfilzomib was 11 months (r. 2-18). Carfilzomib was well tolerated, with grade 2 anemia in 39% (16/41) of patients, successfully managed by ESAs, without necessity of blood transfusions; 29% (12/41) grade 3-4 neutropenia (pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis was given, no ospedalization was required, no septic shocks were observed); 34% (14/41) grade 2, 21% (9/41) grade 3 and 12% (5/41) grade 4 thrombocytopenia, without hemorrhagic events and transfusion-dependency. Moreover, it was observed pneumonia in 39% (16/41) of patients, treated by common antibiotic drugs and always solved. A cardiac monitoring was performed for all patients: hypertension (grade 2-3) in 34% (14/41) of patients; fatigue in 39% (16/31) of patients. Conclusions: Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone has shown significant efficacy in a particularly severe setting of patients, relapsed and refractory to all available therapeutic resources, also lenalidomide, and it could be considered as a bridge to a second autologous or allogenic SCT.

scholarly journals Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone in the Management of Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5020-5020
Author(s):  
Claudio Cerchione ◽  
Davide Nappi ◽  
Anna Emanuele Pareto ◽  
Fabrizio Pane ◽  
Lucio Catalano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Primary Prophylaxis ◽  
Cardiac Monitoring ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Antibiotic Drugs ◽  
Impressive Result ◽  
Significant Efficacy ◽  
Proven Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Carfilzomib is an epoxyketone proteasome inhibitor of second generation, proved to be effective and safe in relapsed and refractory Multiple Myeloma (rrMM), in combination with dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone. In this retrospective observational trial, it has been evaluated efficacy and safety of carfilzomib, in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) as salvage regimen in patients with rrMM, refractory to lenalidomide, where lenalidomide-based regimens have no proven efficacy. 41 patients (23 M/18 F), with rrMM, median age at diagnosis 63.7 years (r. 43-82), median age at start of treatment 67 years (r. 48-84) previously treated with several lines of treatments (median 3, r. 2-11), underwent to KRD regimen (ASPIRE trial schedule) for a median treatment cycles of 8 (r 2-18). ISS was equally distributed, and all patients had previously been treated with bortezomib and IMIDs, and were refractory to this agents. 61% (19/31) of them had undergone at least to a single ASCT. According to IMWG criteria, after a median follow-up of 9 months (r. 2-18), ORR was 68,2% (28/41: 9 CR, 12 VGPR, 7 PR) with 5 progressive diseases (PD) and 8 patients in stable disease (SD): this can be considered as an impressive result in this subset of rrMM patients, refractory to lenalidomide. In particular, for 11 patients, KRD was, after having achieved at least a PR, a bridge to second/third autologous SCT. Median time to response was 1.3 months (r.1-4), median OS from diagnosis was 62 months (r. 9-170), median OS from start of Carfilzomib was 11 months (r. 2-18). Carfilzomib was well tolerated, with grade 2 anemia in 39%(16/41) of patients, successfully managed by ESAs, without necessity of blood transfusions; 29% (12/41) grade 3-4 neutropenia (pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis was given, no ospedalization was required, no septic shocks were observed); 34% (14/41) grade 2, 21% (9/41) grade 3 and 12% (5/41) grade 4 thrombocytopenia, without hemorrhagic events and transfusion-dependency. Moreover, it was observed pneumonia in 39% (16/41) of patients, treated by common antibiotic drugs and always solved. A cardiac monitoring was performed for all patients: hypertension (grade 2-3) in 34% (14/41) of patients; fatigue in 39% (16/31) of patients. Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone has shown significant efficacy in a particularly severe setting of patients, relapsed and refractory to all available therapeutic resources, also lenalidomide, and it could be considered as a bridge to a second autologous or allogenic SCT. Disclosures Martinelli: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene /BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Daichii Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy.

PANORAMA 2: A phase II study of panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory multiple myeloma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8012-8012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Robert L. Schlossman ◽  
Donna M. Weber ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

8012 Background: Patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) refractory to bortezomib (BTZ) and an immunomodulatory drug have limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. In a phase I study of pts with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM treated with panobinostat (PAN) + BTZ, clinical responses were observed overall and in pts with BTZ-refractory disease. We report results in PANORAMA 2, a trial in relapsed and BTZ-refractory pts. Methods: PANORAMA 2 is a single-arm, phase II study of PAN + BTZ + dexamethasone (Dex) in pts with relapsed and BTZ-refractory MM. Treatment phase 1 (TP1) consists of eight 3-week cycles of oral PAN + intravenous BTZ + oral Dex. Pts demonstrating clinical benefit enter treatment phase 2 (TP2) which consists of four 6-week cycles of PAN + BTZ + Dex. The primary endpoint is overall response (≥ partial response [PR]) in TP1. Results: Fifty-five pts with BTZ-refractory MM were enrolled with 10 pts ongoing and 28 in follow-up. The median age was 61 years (range 41-88 years). Pts were heavily pretreated: the median number of prior regimens was 4 (range 2-11), and most pts (64%) received prior autologous stem cell transplant. Twenty-seven (49%) and 36 (65%) pts had BTZ and Dex in their most recent prior line of therapy, respectively. Eighteen pts achieved ≥ PR for an overall response rate of 33% (1 near complete response and 17 PR), and 13 pts achieved MR for a clinical benefit rate of 56%. Three pts achieved a VGPR. Eighteen pts completed TP1 and entered TP2, and 2 have completed ≥ 12 cycles. Common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included thrombocytopenia (66%), fatigue (64%), diarrhea (62%), nausea (58%), dyspnea (40%), anemia (38%), decreased appetite (36%), and dizziness (36%). Common grade 3/4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (58%), fatigue (17%), anemia (15%), pneumonia (15%), neutropenia (13%), and diarrhea (13%). Only 1 pt (2%) experienced grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy. Conclusions: PAN synergizes with BTZ in recapturing responses in heavily pretreated, BTZ-refractory MM pts. The combination of PAN and BTZ is a promising treatment for pts with BTZ-refractory MM that is generally well tolerated, with several pts receiving therapy long term.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document