scholarly journals Prospective Study to Reduce Clostridium Difficile Infection in Patients Receiving Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1899-1899
Author(s):  
Samuel David Maldonado ◽  
Joseph Van Galen ◽  
Kyle Grose ◽  
Michael K Keng ◽  
Leonid Volodin

Abstract Background: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major complication facing patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and can be associated with increased morbidity and length of stay (LOS). Various institutional and multicenter studies have reported incidence rates in this population ranging from less than 5% to more than 10% in this high-risk population. CDIs are not only problematic for individual patient care, but CDI also negatively impact hospital resource utilization by increasing post-transplant LOS. A prospective quality improvement study was initiated at the University of Virginia (UVA) to decrease CDI. Methods: To decrease CDI rate, a multidisciplinary team comprised of oncology and infectious diseases physicians, pharmacists, and nurses was formed. The group used quality improvement principles to identify and target areas of greatest significance. Retrospective chart review was done of 65 consecutive patient ASCT encounters from June 2016 to July 2017 to establish the baseline cohort. For each of these encounters, extensive patient demographics, clinical, and inpatient event data were collected. Analysis of the data identified 17% CDI rate (n=11) in the 30-day period following ASCT. The aim of study was to decrease the CDI rate by 33%. The team used qualitative and quantitative tools to understand factors contributing to CDI, including: process map and a priority matrix categorizing potential interventions based on impact and ease of implementation. A statistical process control chart (p-chart with 3 sigma limits) depicted rates of CDI in the baseline cohort and intervention groups. Results: The baseline CDI rate was 17%. Three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles of interventions were implemented; post-intervention data were collected and analyzed. From August 2017 to June 2018, the first PDSA cycle consisted of eliminating ciprofloxacin prophylaxis between T+0 and count recovery (which was standard of care) due to hypothesis that the prophylactic antibiotic itself was leading to increases in CDIs. The first PDSA cycle resulted in an increased CDI rate of 19% (n=12) and worsening of sepsis events. Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis was reinstituted. A second PDSA cycle was executed between July 2018 and January 2020 incorporating ultraviolet (UV) light equipment into existing post-discharge cleaning practices, resulting in a decreased CDI rate of 9% (n=11). A third PDSA cycle was conducted from February 2020 through current (July 2021) and added a 2-step C. diff PCR and toxin assay into testing protocols, leading to a further CDI rate decrease to 7% (n=9). P-chart depicting CDI reduction is shown in Figure 1. A significant difference in CDI incidence was found comparing patients before and after implementation of UV light cleaning practices (p<0.01). Figure 2 is a XMR-chart showing a numerical decrease of hospital LOS from 14.6 to 13.8 days after the 3 PDSA cycles, although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.055). Conclusions: This prospective study surpassed the goal to reduce CDI by 33% by using quality improvement methods to drive a clinically significant special cause variation reduction in the 30-day CDI incidence after ASCT and a trend towards decreased LOS at UVA. This study not only improved patient care, but likely represents increased patient quality of life and cost savings. Future PDSA cycles are scheduled and may include other cancer patients beyond those receiving ASCT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 219-219
Author(s):  
Joseph Van Galen ◽  
Samuel Maldonado ◽  
Leonid Volodin ◽  
Michael Kenneth Keng

219 Background: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most important affecting patients immunocompromised by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and can be associated with increased morbidity and length of stay. One precipitating factor for index CDI cases in the ASCT population is heavy antibiotic exposure, which often includes prophylaxis. A retrospective review identified 11 cases of CDI (17%) in the 30-day period following ASCT performed at the University of Virginia Medical Center (UVAMC) between about June 2016 and July 2017. Various institutional and multicenter studies have reported incidence rates in this population ranging from less than 5% to more than 10%. Methods: To decrease CDI rate, a multidisciplinary team comprised of oncology and infectious diseases physicians, pharmacists, and nurses was formed. The group used quality improvement principles to identify and target areas of greatest significance. A first PDSA cycle was conducted between approximately July 2017 and June 2018, during which time administration of standard-of-care ciprofloxacin prophylaxis between T+0 and count recovery was suspended. A second PDSA cycle was executed between approximately May 2018 and July 2019, incorporating UV light equipment into existing post-discharge cleaning practices. Data were analyzed using process control charts with 3-sigma limits for ASCT length-of-stay (LOS) and 30-day post-transplant CDI incidence. Results: Suspension of prophylactic antibiotics did not have a significant effect on CDI incidence in our first PDSA cycle. In our second improvement cycle, most of which elapsed after prophylactic ciprofloxacin had been re-implemented, CDI incidence was almost halved, from 17 to 9%. A numerical decreased in LOS was observed in each subsequent PDSA cycle. Conclusions: Our multidisciplinary team applied quality improvement methods to drive a clinically significant reduction in the 30-day CDI incidence after ASCT at UVAMC. This outcome should be associated with an improved patient experience. Future PDSA cycles are scheduled and may include other cancer patients, beyond those receiving stem cell transplantation.[Table: see text]


2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen C. Sherman ◽  
Thomas G. Plante ◽  
Stephanie Simonton ◽  
Umaira Latif ◽  
Elias J. Anaissie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document