scholarly journals A randomized phase 3 trial of auto vs. allo transplantation as part of first-line therapy in poor-risk peripheral T-NHL

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Schmitz ◽  
Lorenz H Truemper ◽  
Krimo Bouabdallah ◽  
Marita Ziepert ◽  
Mathieu Leclerc ◽  
...  

Standard first-line therapy for younger patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma consists of six courses of CHOP or CHOEP consolidated by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (AutoSCT). We hypothesized that consolidative allogeneic transplantation (AlloSCT) could improve outcome. 104 patients with nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma except ALK+ ALCL, 18 to 60 years of age, all stages and IPI scores except stage 1 and aaIPI 0, were randomized to receive 4 x CHOEP and 1 x DHAP followed by high-dose therapy and AutoSCT or myeloablative conditioning and AlloSCT. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) at three years. After a median follow-up of 42 months, 3-year EFS of patients undergoing AlloSCT was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29%; 57%) as compared to 38% (95% CI: 25%; 52%) after AutoSCT. Overall survival at 3 years was 57% (95% CI: 43%; 71%) versus 70% (95% CI: 57%; 82%) after AlloSCT or AutoSCT, without significant differences between treatment arms. None of 21 responding patients proceeding to AlloSCT as opposed to 13 of 36 patients (36%) proceeding to AutoSCT relapsed. Eight of 26 patients (31%) and none of 41 patients died due to transplant-related toxicity after allogeneic and autologous transplantation, respectively. In younger patients with T-cell lymphoma standard chemotherapy consolidated by autologous or allogeneic transplantation results in comparable survival. The strong graft-versus-lymphoma effect after AlloSCT was counterbalanced by transplant-related mortality. CHO(E)P followed by AutoSCT remains the preferred treatment option for transplant-eligible patients. AlloSCT is the treatment of choice for relapsing patients also after AutoSCT.

2012 ◽  
pp. 217-228
Author(s):  
David Sibon ◽  
Christian Gisselbrecht ◽  
Francine Foss

Haematologica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (7) ◽  
pp. 1191-1197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Bellei ◽  
Francine M. Foss ◽  
Andrei R. Shustov ◽  
Steven M. Horwitz ◽  
Luigi Marcheselli ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2810-2810
Author(s):  
Charalampia Kyriakou ◽  
Ayoma Attygalle ◽  
David Linch ◽  
Anthony Goldstone ◽  
Paul Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma (AITL) is a rare Peripheral T-cell lymphoma that primarily affects the elderly, presenting as advanced disease characterized by aggressive behaviour and very poor outcome. Despite the unfavourable prognosis, the best approach for treating patients with AITL is still unknown. We report a retrospective multicentre study of 64 AITL patients (37 male, 27 female) who were diagnosed as AITL in our institution based on typical histology and molecular clonality analysis between 1995 and 2004. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years (range 25 to 87). Fifty-two patients (81%) presented with advanced stage III–IV disease, 41 (64%) had B symptoms and 49 (76%) elevated LDH. ECOG performance status was 1 for 40%, 2 for 53% and 3 for 9% of the patients. Based on IPI risk factors 12% of the patients were classified as low risk, 17% low intermediate, 29% high intermediate and 42% as high risk. Six patients developed autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. Therapeutic approach varied from no treatment to high dose therapy (HDT). The majority of the patients had received CHOP chemotherapy. Overall 19 patients (30%) had received 1 treatment line, 20 (31%) had 2, 19 (30%) 3, 4 patients (6%) were treated with ≥4 and 2 (3%) were not eligible for any treatment. Twenty patients (31%) proceeded to an autologous and 2 to allogeneic transplantation after achieving CR (n=12), PR (n=7) while 3 had progressive disease. Following first line therapy 37 patients (58%) achieved CR, 15 (23%) PR and 10 (16%) had primary refractory disease. Median time to relapse or progression was 6 months (1 to 89). Interestingly three patients relapsed as EBV driven DLBCL, 1as DLBCL and 2 as EBV driven Hodgkin’s lymphoma. With a median follow-up of 19 months (1 to 119) twenty-six patients (41%) were alive. Eighteen (28%) of these patients were in CR, and 8 in PR (13%). Thirty-seven patients (58%) died, 29 (45%) from disease progression. Twelve patients developed toxic complications -infectious complications (n=8), haemorrhage (n=1), thrombosis (n=1) myocardial infarction (n=2). The estimated PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 33% and 27% respectively. Overall survival rates were estimated at 55% and 28% at 2 and 4 years. By univariate and multivariate analyses, no response to first line therapy (p=0.035) and male sex (p=0.0161), were significantly associated with higher relapse rate. Application of HDT resulted to significantly superior PFS (p=0.002). Poor performance status at presentation was the only factor found to be significant for the OS (p= 0.0317). In conclusion analysis of the results of this large cohort of AITL patients showed that although the initial overall response rate was 73% this was short lived. It is estimated that less than 30% of the patients will survive and remain disease free at 4 years. Considering the dismal outcome with current therapeutic approaches, new strategies using novel agents to improve further and most importantly maintain initial response are needed. The role of frontline HDT either autologous or allogeneic for eligible AITL patients is worth exploring in prospective collaborative studies.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5360-5360
Author(s):  
Yuko Shirouchi ◽  
Takanori Fukuta ◽  
Anna Nishihara ◽  
Norihito Inoue ◽  
Hideki Uryu ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogeneous group of generally aggressive lymphomas that account for 5-15%of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), is the most common subtype that accounts for 25.9% of PTCL, followed by angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), NK/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL), Adult T-cell Leukemia/Lymphoma (ATLL), ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK+ ALCL), and ALK-negative ALCL (ALK- ALCL) (Vose J. et al, 2008). The Prognostic Index for PTCL-NOS (PIT; Gallamini A. et al, 2004) is a prognostic model widely used for PTCL-NOS. There are, however, no established risk factors developed specifically for PTCL after progression/relapse. We report the survival outcomes of 6 common subtypes of PTCL after first line therapy as well as after first progression/relapse, and report newly identified prognostic factors for PTCL after progression/relapse. Methods We identified 144 patients with newly diagnosed PTCL-NOS, AITL, ALK+ ALCL, ALK- ALCL, NKTCL and ATLL between 2005-2017 in our institution. After excluding patients who did not receive treatment in our institution, we performed a retrospective analysis of the remaining 132 newly diagnosed patients (PTCL-NOS n=47, AITL n=21, ALK- ALCL n=6, ALK+ ALCL n=9, NKTCL n=36, ATLL n=21). Furthermore, we analyzed 57 cases of first progression/relapse. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated for newly diagnosed lymphoma (OS1 and PFS1) and at first progression/relapse (OS2 and PFS2), using the Kaplan-Meier method. OS1 and OS2 were further compared by PIT groups. Additionally, possible prognostic factors for OS2 were compared by log rank test. Variables that remained significant in univariate analysis were incorporated in multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard regression model to further investigate independent prognostic factors. For patients who underwent autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT), response to therapy was evaluated before SCT. Results The overall response rate (ORR) for first line therapy was 74.2% (95% CI: 65.9-81.5%), with a complete response (CR) rate of 58.3% (95% CI: 49.4-66.8%). Median follow up was 26.5 months and the median OS and PFS were 43 months (95% CI: 30-57 months) and 14 months (95% CI: 8-20 months), respectively. There were significant differences in OS1 by subtype; ALK+ ALCL did not achieve the median, and ATLL fared the worst, with median OS1 of 7 months (Figure 1). There was a correlation between PIT scores and OS1 in our cohort (P < .001). Seventy-nine patients (60%) experienced progression/relapse after first line therapy. After excluding patients who did not receive salvage treatment at our institution, we analyzed the remaining 57 cases with progression/relapse (PTCL-NOS n=33, AITL n=10, ALK- ALCL n=4, ALK+ ALCL n=1, NKTCL n=9). The ORR and CR rates at progression/relapse were 46% (95% CI: 32.4-59.3%) and 25% (95% CI: 14.1-37.8%), respectively. The median OS2 was 13 months (95% CI: 6-23 months) and PFS2 was 3 months (95% CI: 2-7 months). There were no cases with ATLL in progression/relapse as all patients with ATLL were either too frail to receive salvage therapy after first progression/relapse, or proceeded to SCT in first remission. Neither PIT at diagnosis nor at first progression/relapse was predictive of OS2. Moreover, there was no correlation between PIT and OS2 in an analysis limited to only patients with PTCL-NOS. Multivariate analysis revealed that presence of B-symptoms (HR: 4.83, 95% CI: 2.10-11.0, P < .001) and Performance Status (PS) greater than 1 (HR: 6.13, 95% CI: 1.84-20.4, P = .003) were significantly associated with poor OS2. Achieving complete or partial remission after first line therapy was associated with superior OS2 (HR 9.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.71, P = .003). Complete or partial remission after first line therapy was the only independent predictive factor for PFS2 (HR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15-0.65, P = .002). Conclusion The presence of B-symptoms and poor PS at progression/relapse were associated with poor OS2. Achieving complete or partial remission after first line therapy was associated with superior OS2. To our knowledge, B-symptoms and response to previous therapy have never been reported as independent prognostic factors. A study with a larger sample size and longer follow-up period is warranted to further assess the validity of these factors. Disclosures Nishimura: Chugai pharmaceutical inc, Roche: Other: commissioned work. Mishima:Chugai pharmaceutical inc, Roche: Other: commissioned work. Yokoyama:Chugai pharmaceutical inc, Roche: Other: commissioned work. Terui:Bristol myers Squib: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical KK: Honoraria; Takeda pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Novartis pharma: Honoraria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document