Delivery of Autologous Bone Marrow Precursor Cells into the Spinal Cord Via Lumbar Puncture Technique in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5204-5204
Author(s):  
Fernando Callera

Abstract Alternative and less invasive routes for delivering hematopoietic stem cells in animals models of spinal cord injury (SCI) were described and the advantages of the percutaneous lumbar puncture (LP) technique have been recently demonstrated. (Bakshi A et al. 2004, Lepore AC et al. 2005) This proposition has not been described in humans. We therefore tested it by examining whether autologous bone marrow precursor cells can be delivered into the spinal cord via LP in patients with SCI. Seven patients with SCI (four had paraplegia and three had quadriplegia) were enrolled. The median age was 24 years and the mean duration of injury was 3 years. Patients received G-CSF (10microg/Kg) for five consecutive days and 100mL of bone marrow cells (BMC) were aspirated from the posterior iliac crest on day 6. Patients provided written informed consent. Mononuclear cells were separated by a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient, washed and resuspended in PBS. Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ cells was performed as previously described. (Gratama JW et al. 2001) Transplantation was performed 4 hours after bone marrow aspiration. CSF samples were collected before and seven days after the transplantation. For each patient, 15x106 mononuclear cells were injected via LP; the median number of CD34+ cells was 2.5x105 (1.8–5.0x105). Cell viability before transplantation was superior to 90% in all samples. Patients had no adverse events. CSF examination was normal in both times. Bone marrow precursor cells are clinically attractive because they can be obtained in patients at bedside raising the possibility of an autologous model of cell therapy for SCI. However, the potential therapeutic effects of these cells for SCI are poorly understood. What is the optimal CD34+ cell dosage? Will multiple doses of CD34+ cells be more efficacious? Is CD34+ the most appropriate BMC subset? Will BMC subsets combinations be more efficacious? The follow-up of our patients will probably provide some information. The absence of cells in CSF samples obtained after seven days is also intriguing. Although high speculative, a possible explanation is that cells home toward the injured spinal cord. All these issues need to be resolved in carefully designed experiments. Finally, our study demonstrated the possibility of delivering autologous bone marrow precursor cells via LP in patients with SCI. This procedure is feasible, safe and well-tolerated in humans. The potential therapeutic effects of these cells for SCI remain to be elucidated.

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 096368972095063
Author(s):  
Wugui Chen ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Sizhen Yang ◽  
Jing Sun ◽  
Hao Qiu ◽  
...  

Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains among the most challenging pathologies worldwide and has limited therapeutic possibilities and a very bleak prognosis. Biomaterials and stem cell transplantation are promising treatments for functional recovery in SCI. Seven patients with acute complete SCI diagnosed by a combination of methods were included in the study, and different lengths (2.0–6.0 cm) of necrotic spinal cord tissue were surgically cleaned under intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Subsequently, NeuroRegen scaffolds loaded with autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs) were implanted into the cleaned site. All patients participated in 6 months of rehabilitation and at least 3 years of clinical follow-up. No adverse symptoms associated with stem cell or functional scaffold implantation were observed during the 3-year follow-up period. Additionally, partial shallow sensory and autonomic nervous functional improvements were observed in some patients, but no motor function recovery was observed. Magnetic resonance imaging suggested that NeuroRegen scaffold implantation supported injured spinal cord continuity after treatment. These findings indicate that implantation of NeuroRegen scaffolds combined with stem cells may serve as a safe and promising clinical treatment for patients with acute complete SCI. However, determining the therapeutic effects and exact application methods still requires further study.


2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidetaka Nishida ◽  
Masanari Nakayama ◽  
Hiroshi Tanaka ◽  
Masahiko Kitamura ◽  
Shingo Hatoya ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-153
Author(s):  
Pradipta Tripathy ◽  
Chidananda Dash ◽  
Aurobind Rath ◽  
S. Chakraborty ◽  
Jagannath Sahoo ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 702-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirmeen A. Kishk ◽  
Hala Gabr ◽  
Sherif Hamdy ◽  
Lamia Afifi ◽  
Noha Abokresha ◽  
...  

Background: Autologous bone marrow mesenchymal cells that include stem cells (MSCs) are a clinically attractive cellular therapy option to try to treat severe spinal cord injury (SCI). Objective: To study the possible value of MSCs injected intrathecally to enhance rehabilitation. Methods: This case control, convenience sample included 64 patients, at a mean of 3.6 years after SCI. Forty-four subjects received monthly intrathecal autologous MSCs for 6 months and 20 subjects, who would not agree to the procedures, served as controls. All subjects received rehabilitation therapies 3 times weekly. Subjects were evaluated at entry and at 12 months after completing the 6-months intervention. By the ASIA Impairment Scale, ASIA grading of completeness of injury, Ashworth Spasticity Scale, Functional Ambulation Classification, and bladder and bowel control questionnaire. Results: No differences were found in baseline measures and descriptors between the MSC group and control group. Although a higher percentage of the MSC group increased motor scores by 1-2 points and changed from ASIA A to B, no significant between-group improvements were found in clinical measures. Adverse effects of cells included spasticity and, in 24 out of the 43 patients developed neuropathic pain. One subject with a history of post-infectious myelitis developed encephalomyelitis after her third injection. Conclusion: Autologus MSCs may have side effects and may be contraindicated in patients with a history of myelitis. Their utility in treating chronic traumatic SCI needs further study in pre-clinical models and in randomized controlled trials before they should be offered to patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document