Target Dose Adjustment of Oral Busulfan Using a Test Dose in Japanese Adults Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5313-5313
Author(s):  
Yasushi Takamatsu ◽  
Kentaro Ogata ◽  
Noriaki Sasaki ◽  
Shuuji Hara ◽  
Tetsuya Eto ◽  
...  

Abstract Oral busulfan (BU) is widely used in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HST). Therapeutic effect of BU is related to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) or the average plasma concentrations at steady state (Css). It has been shown that BU pharmacokinetics (PK) are highly variable and the dose adjustment according to the BU levels is critical to get the successful results of HST for Caucasians. BU is metabolized mainly in the liver through conjugation with glutathione by glutathione S-transferase (GST). Recent study has shown that the polymorphisms of GST genes are associated with the risk of developing hepatic veno-occlusive disease in patients undergoing HST. Ethnic variation is also demonstrated in relation to a gene deletion polymorphism of GST, suggesting that BU metabolism is influenced by the race. BU PK have been extensively investigated in Caucasians and few studies have focused on Asian people. We therefore underwent a prospective trial of adjusting BU doses depending on the individual BU PK in 36 Japanese patients aged from 16 to 64 years (median; 47 years). All patients received a busulfan-containing conditioning regimen and underwent allogeneic HST. Individual PK were studied following a 0.5 mg/kg test dose of BU administered orally. BU concentrations were measured by a high-performance liquid chromatographic method and individual PK parameters of BU were calculated with a one-compartment model by using Bayesian modeling program. The median clearance (CL/F) was 0.16 L/hr/kg (0.09 to 0.34 L/hr/kg), the median volume of distribution (Vd/F) 0.65 L/kg (range; 0.41 to 0.97 L/kg), the median elimination half-life (t1/2) 2.9 hr (range; 1.9 to 7.0 hr), and the median absorption rate constant (ka) 2.46 /hr (range; 0.53 to 6.03 /hr). BU doses were adjusted to achieve a target BU Css between 800 and 900 ng/mL. Twenty-six (72%) patients were required to reduce BU doses and adjusted BU doses ranged from 0.51 to 1.29 mg/kg/time (median; 0.85 mg/kg/time). After administrating the 6th dose of BU for the conditioning regimen, BU PK were analyzed. Expected Css was significantly correlated with observed Css and predictability of the test dose was 106.4±21.8%. Engraftment was successful in 34 of 36 (94%) patients. Grade 2 to 4 regimen-related toxicity except stomatitis occurred in 4 (11%) patients. These data demonstrate that BU PK vary widely from one patient to another after oral BU in Japanese and individualization of BU doses depending on the BU PK are useful in improving clinical outcome in patients undergoing HST.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3006-3006
Author(s):  
Sandeep Chunduri ◽  
Rakesh Beri ◽  
Lisa C. Dobogai ◽  
Elizabeth Hurter ◽  
Christina Mactal-Haaf ◽  
...  

Abstract In this study we tested the efficacy of a test dose of iv busulfan in targeting blood levels of this drug during the conditioning regimen prior to an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. We analyzed blood samples of 22 patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a busulfan-based conditioning regimen. Patients received a test dose of busulfan at 0.8 mg/kg as a 60 minute intravenous infusion. Serial blood samples were drawn at eight time points: 15 minutes before dose, at end of infusion, 15 minutes after completion, 30 minutes after completion, 60 minutes after completion, 2 hours after completion, 4 hours after completion, and 6 hours after completion. Pharmacokinetics (PK) studies were then performed at the Seattle Cancer Care pharmacokinetics laboratory. The AUC was determined using WinNonlin Professional software. The conditioning dose of busulfan was calculated by multiplying the test dose in mg/AUC × 4800. After the first dose of busulfan was administered, the same protocol was used to test busulfan PK. If the Busulfan AUC was therapeutic (between 4800 μM*min and 5200 μM*min) then the same dose was continued. If the Busulfan AUC was low or high then the third and fourth doses of busulfan were adjusted. The test dose of 0.8 mg/kg intravenous did not have any hematological side effects. The mean historic dose (solely based on weight) was 3.2 ± 0.1 mg/kg and the mean dose based on the test dose was 3.5 ± 0.5 mg/kg (p=0.02). In 12 patients where we also analyzed PK after the first day of conditioning regimen, AUC values of busulfan obtained during test dose and after day 1 dose were not different (p=0.7). The mean dose of busulfan based on test dose was 3.5 ± 0.6 mg/kg while the final dose based on day 1 busulfan PK was 3.6 ± 0.7 mg/kg (p=0.9). Nevertheless, in 2 CML patients who were on treatment with dasatinib or nilotinib at the time of the test dose, a higher AUC was observed (AUC 6065 and 6200, respectively). A pre-transplant busulfan test dose can be safely performed anytime prior to transplant and allows targeting the dose of busulfan efficiently, thus avoiding the requirement of PK studies during the conditioning regimen.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3280-3280
Author(s):  
Ezhilpavai Mohanan ◽  
Salamun Desire ◽  
Sathya Mani ◽  
Gopinath Srinivasan ◽  
Biju George ◽  
...  

Abstract High-dose Busulfan (Bu) in combination with cyclophosphamide or fludarabine is widely used conditioning regimen prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for various hematological malignant and non-malignant disorders. Intravenous (i.v) formulation of Bu, along with targeted dose adjustment has resulted in reliable systemic exposure (due to its predictable pharmacokinetics (PK)) while minimizing toxicity and treatment failure. We have previously demonstrated the population pharmacokinetics of oral Bu in thalassemia patients undergoing HSCT (Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), Nov 2009; 114: 3349) and factors predicting or influencing the outcomes. Since 2010, a generic form of i.v Bu (BUCELON 60™, Celon Labs, India) with targeted dose adjustment has been used at our center, for HSCT with all Bu based conditioning regimen. There is no report on the PK of Bucelon in patients undergoing HSCT. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the PK of Bucelon in patients undergoing HSCT, compare the systemic exposure to i.v Bucelon vs. previous reports in patients with various hematological diseases and report the toxicity and outcome after i.vBucelon in our patient cohort. Ninety five patients diagnosed with various haematological disorders receiving high dose i.v Bu as combination chemotherapy between June 2010 and July 2013 was included. Seventy three patients received single daily (Q24H-130mg/m2/day) while 22 had 6 hourly doses (Q6H-0.8mg/kg/dose) of Bu. Patient demographics are shown in Table. Peripheral blood samples were collected at different time points (0, 3, 4, 5 & 7hr in Q24H and 0,2,3,4 & 6hr in Q6H) on day 1 and day 3 and plasma Bu concentration were analyzed using an LC-ESI MS/MS method (Salamun DE et al.2013). An AUC of 5000-5500µmoles (cumulative AUC target: 20000 to 22000µmoles) in Q24H or 900-1350µmoles in Q6H was targeted. The effect of pharmacogenetic factors on the PK/systemic exposure of i.v Bucelon were evaluated. The PK parameters estimated were: AUC, Clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) after the 1st dose of Bucelon and after dose adjustment. The median day 1 AUC was 4180µmoles*min (1713-10456) and 599.5µmoles*min (307-1456) in Q24H and Q6H respectively. The median CL and V are 4.19L/h (0.81-21.55) 17.5589L/h (2.51-243.90) in Q6H and 41.83L/h (2.47-144.84) and 156.3L/h (6.5-454.51) in Q24H respectively. We analyzed the effect of polymorphisms in the drug metabolizing genes (GST, CYP) on the first dose AUC of Bu in these patients. Out of the eight polymorphisms in GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, CYP2B6*6, CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3, CYP3A4*1B analyzed, GSTM1 positive patients in Q6H showed a significantly lower median Bucelon AUC, 589µmoles*min (307-1456) than when compared to GSTM1 null patients (median AUC, 963µmoles*min (670-1240) (P=0.0122) Figure). None of the other polymorphisms were found to influence the 1st dose Bucelon AUC in patients receiving once daily or Q6H dose. However, the median day 1 AUC is found to be much less compared to previous report on patients with thalassemia major receiving Q6H i.v Bu: 599.5µmoles*min (307-1456) vs. 971µmoles*min (630-1621) as well as in malignant conditions receiving Q24H dose of i.vBu: 4180µmoles*min (1713-10456) vs. 5113μmoles*min (2796 - 9355).Patient CharacteristicsFigureGSTM1 polymorphism on Bu AUCFigure. GSTM1 polymorphism on Bu AUC When we analyzed the regimen related toxicity in these patients, 10 of the 95 (10.5%) developed sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) of which 3 was severe. Eight patients (8.4%) had not engrafted or rejected and 5 (5.2%) relapsed, 13 patients (13.7%) developed Grade III-IV GVHD and 3 had Hemorrhagic Cystitis. There was no significant difference in the cumulative AUC between those who develop toxicities and those who did not. We report the PK of i.v Bucelon, a generic formulation of i.v Bu for the first time in patients undergoing HSCT. Since the systemic exposure to Bucelon seems to be lower in similar age, disease matched cohort, this may mean that targeted adjustment of Bu is necessary when we use i.vBucelon as conditioning regimen for HSCT. The lower systemic exposure could be due to population difference in PK or due to the drug formulation, or a combination of both, which needs to be validated further. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document