Two-Year Follow-Up Results at the M.D. Anderson Hospital with Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with Fludarabine-Melphalan as Preparative Regimen in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Comparable Outcome with Matched Related and Unrelated Donors.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3115-3115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Anderlini ◽  
Rima M. Saliba ◽  
Sandra Acholonu ◽  
Sergio A. Giralt ◽  
Issa F. Khouri ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) is gaining increasing acceptance in relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL), but there are little or no outcome data with matched unrelated donors (MUDs). METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) following a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen from a matched related donor (MRD; n=25) or a matched unrelated donor (MUD; n=33). The median age was 32 years (range 19–59). The median number of chemotherapy regimens received prior to allo-SCT was five (range 2–9). Forty-eight (83%) patients had received a prior autologous (auto) SCT. The median time to progression after auto-SCT was five months (1–34). Disease status at SCT was sensitive relapse (n=30) or refractory relapse (n=28). The conditioning regimen employed was fludarabine (125–130 mg/m sq over 4–5 days), melphalan (140 mg/m sq IV over 2 days) (FM) and antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin 6 mg/kg over 3 days) was added for the most recent fourteen MUD transplants. Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included tacrolimus and mini-methotrexate. RESULTS: Chimerism studies indicated 100% donor-derived engraftment in all patients (100%). Cumulative 100-day and 2-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) were 7% and 15%, respectively, (100-day TRM MRD vs. MUD 6% vs. 8%, p=ns; 2-year MRD vs. MUD 13% vs. 16%, p=ns). The cumulative incidence of acute (grade II–IV) GVHD (first 100 days) was 28% (MRD vs. MUD 12% vs. 39%, p=0.04). The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at any time was 74% (MRD vs. MUD 57% vs. 89%, p=0.003). Fourteen pts (24%) received a total of 25 (range 1–5) donor leukocyte infusions (DLIs) for disease progression/relapse (PD). Five of them (35%) received salvage chemotherapy as well, and nine (64%) developed acute GVHD after the DLI. Thirty-six patients (62%) are alive (23 in remission) with a median follow-up of 24 months (4–78). The f/up is 23 months (4–53) for alive pts always in remission. Twenty-two patients (38%) expired, and relapse-related mortality was 24%. Projected 2-year overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival are 64% (49–76) and 32% (20–45), with projected 2-year PD at 55% (43–70). There was no statistically significant difference between MRD and MUD transplants with regard to OS (p=0.1), PFS (p=0.9) and PD (p=0.8). There was a clear trend for the response status prior to allo-SCT (complete response, complete response undefined vs. all others) to favorably impact PFS (p=0.07) and PD (p=0.049), but not OS (p=0.4). Partial responders and patients with stable or refractory disease fared similarly with regard to OS and PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the expected higher incidence of acute and chronic GVHD, MUD RIC allo-SCTs had TRM, PFS, and OS comparable to MRD allo-SCTs. Day 100, 2-year TRM and OS/PFS data appear very encouraging in these very high-risk, extensively pretreated patients. Response status at transplant seems to affect outcome, and PD remains a major obstacle. The use of unrelated donors would greatly expand donor availability for these patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204062072110381
Author(s):  
Samuel Romero ◽  
Aitana Balaguer-Roselló ◽  
Juan Montoro ◽  
Paola Beneit ◽  
Amelia Martínez ◽  
...  

The poor prognosis of refractory or relapsed (R/R) classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma (cHL) after autologous stem cell transplantation has improved greatly due to the introduction of brentuximab vedotin and PD-1 inhibitors. However, the duration of response achieved with these novel agents is too short. The information about the management of patients after anti-PD-1 therapy failure is very limited in cHL, although chemotherapy alone or combined with PD-1 inhibitors has shown encouraging results. We report three cases of heavily pretreated cHL, refractory to nivolumab monotherapy, successfully rescued with the addition of chemotherapy to nivolumab, as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). All three patients presented poor clinical features such as three to four previous lines including brentuximab vedotin and autologous stem cell transplantation, refractoriness to the last line of therapy previous to nivolumab, and rapid disease progression. Notwithstanding these characteristics and nivolumab failure, they achieved a complete response after the addition of chemotherapy, were consolidated with allo-SCT, and still remain in complete response. There are few studies concerning the combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy after nivolumab failure, including one retrospective study and one phase II trial with nivolumab plus bendamustine. Therefore, only few patients are consolidated with allo-SCT. However, there are several ongoing trials investigating new combinations of chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitors in R/R cHL, as well as in first line. All these data suggest that anti-PD-1 therapy may reprogram the immune system, activating and inhibiting effector and immunosuppressive cells, respectively, leading to overtake of chemorefractoriness. Allo-SCT can increase the immune-related events of patients treated with anti-PD-1 previously, consistent on acute graft- versus-host disease, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, and noninfectious febrile syndrome. In conclusion, the combination of PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy may be a feasible therapy after anti-PD-1 treatment failure as a bridge to allo-SCT.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5526-5526
Author(s):  
Tulay Ozcelik ◽  
Serkan Guvenc ◽  
Fehmi Hindilerden ◽  
Baris Hasbal ◽  
Songul Serefhanoglu ◽  
...  

Abstract Minority of patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) are primary refractory or relapse very early after first-line chemotherapy or even after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous HSCT. The dismal outcome of these patients was shown by many previous studies. We evaluated the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in this setting. We retrospectively analysed 6 consecutive patients (med age 45) with primary refractory advanced stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma transplanted between 2011-2013. The median time from initial diagnosis and from autologous HSCT to allogeneic transplantation was 44.1 mo.s and 12.4 mo.s, respectively. The donor sources were sibling in 4, unrelated in one and haploidentical in 1. The conditioning regimen was myeloablative (BU-CY) in 3 and reduced intensity (Flu-Mel±ATG) in 3 adjusted according to their age and comorbid conditions. All of them received peripheral blood stem cells. Engraftment failure was not observed. None of them were complicated with VOD or other early complications of HSCT. Day 100 transplantation related mortality was 16.7% (1 patient). The patient succumbed to carbapenemase+ klebsiella pneumonia sepsis on day +11. Median follow up of the surviving patients was 14.65 months (range, 6-26). At the last follow up 3 of them were in CR, one patient had progression after HSCT and achieved stable disease with brentuximab and DLI. One patient died from acute abdominal infection on +187 while in CR. Only one patient was complicated with both acute and chronic GVHD (unrelated HSCT). The myeloablative regimen was tolerated well and the patients achieved durable remission. The expired patients were both in RIC arm. Although the number of transplanted patients is low we can conclude that allogeneic HSCT using myeloablative regimen is safe and effective in short term. Primary refractory HL patients should be evaluated for allogeneic HSCT, as upfront or following failure of autologous HSCT and HDCT. Ablative regimen is tolerated as well as RIC, and more effective than allo RIC for disease control in the light of our current limited cohort. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document