Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adolescents and Young Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: Special Considerations and Challenges

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) represent a challenging group of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients with specific needs. While there is growing evidence from comparative studies that this age group profits from intensified paediatric-based chemotherapy, the impact and optimal implementation of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the overall treatment strategy is less clear. Over recent years, improved survival rates after myeloablative allogeneic HSCT for ALL have been reported similarly for AYAs and children despite differences in transplantation practise. Still, AYAs appear to have inferior outcomes and an increased risk of treatment-related morbidity and mortality in comparison with children. To further improve HSCT outcomes and reduce toxicities in AYAs, accurate stratification and evaluation of additional or alternative targeted treatment options are crucial, based on specific molecular and immunological characterisation of ALL and minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment during therapy. Age-specific factors such as increased acute toxicities and poorer adherence to treatment as well as late sequelae might influence treatment decisions. In addition, educational, social, work, emotional, and sexual aspects during this very crucial period of life need to be considered. In this review, we summarise the key findings of recent studies on treatment approach and outcomes in this vulnerable patient group after HSCT, turning our attention to the different approaches applied in paediatric and adult centres. We focus on the specific needs of AYAs with ALL regarding social aspects and supportive care to handle complications as well as fertility issues. Finally, we comment on potential areas of future research and concisely debate the capacity of currently available immunotherapies to reduce toxicity and further improve survival in this challenging patient group.

Serotherapy as Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

Serotherapy comprising agents such as anti-thymocyte globulin, anti-T-lymphocyte globulin, and the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab is used widely to reduce the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The outcome of transplants using matched unrelated donors now approaches that of matched sibling donors. This is likely due to better disease control in recipients, the use of donors more closely human-leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched to recipients, and more effective graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. The price paid for reduced GvHD is slower immune reconstitution of T cells and thus more infections. This has led to studies looking to optimise the amount of serotherapy used. The balance between prevention of GvHD on one side and prevention of infections and relapse on the other side is quite delicate. Serotherapy is given with chemotherapy-/radiotherapy-based conditioning prior to HSCT. Due to their long half-lives, agents used for serotherapy may be detectable in patients well after graft infusion. This exposes the graft-infused T cells to a lympholytic effect, impacting T-cell recovery. As such, excessive serotherapy dosing may lead to no GvHD but a higher incidence of infections and relapse of leukaemia, while under-dosing may result in a higher chance of serious GvHD as immunity recovers more quickly. Individualised dosing is being developed through studies including retrospective analyses of serotherapy exposure, population pharmacokinetic modelling, therapeutic drug monitoring in certain centres, and the development of dosing models reliant on factors including the patient's peripheral blood lymphocyte count. Early results of “optimal” dosing strategies for serotherapy and conditioning chemotherapy show promise of improved overall survival.

Current Prophylaxis and Treatment Approaches for Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, higher event-free survival (EFS) was observed in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and grade II aGvHD vs. patients with no or grade I GvHD in the randomised, controlled, open-label, international, multicentre Phase III For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age (FORUM) trial. This finding suggests that moderate-severity aGvHD is associated with a graft-versus-leukaemia effect which protects against leukaemia recurrence. In order to optimise the benefits of HSCT for leukaemia patients, reduction of non-relapse mortality—which is predominantly caused by severe GvHD—is of utmost importance. Herein, we review contemporary prophylaxis and treatment options for aGvHD in children with ALL and the key challenges of aGvHD management, focusing on maintaining the graft-versus-leukaemia effect without increasing the severity of GvHD.

T-Cell-Replete Versus ex vivo T-Cell-Depleted Haploidentical Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia and Other Haematological Malignancies

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a potentially curative option for children with high-risk or refractory/relapsed leukaemias. Traditional donor hierarchy favours a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) over an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD), followed by alternative donors such as haploidentical donors or unrelated cord blood. However, haploidentical HSCT (hHSCT) may be entailed with significant advantages: besides a potentially increased graft-vs.-leukaemia effect, the immediate availability of a relative as well as the possibility of a second donation for additional cellular therapies may impact on outcome. The key question in hHSCT is how, and how deeply, to deplete donor T-cells. More T cells in the graft confer faster immune reconstitution with consecutively lower infection rates, however, greater numbers of T-cells might be associated with higher rates of graft-vs.-host disease (GvHD). Two different methods for reduction of alloreactivity have been established: in vivo T-cell suppression and ex vivo T-cell depletion (TCD). Ex vivo TCD of the graft uses either positive selection or negative depletion of graft cells before infusion. In contrast, T-cell-repleted grafts consisting of non-manipulated bone marrow or peripheral blood grafts require intense in vivo GvHD prophylaxis. There are two major T-cell replete protocols: one is based on post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), while the other is based on anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG; Beijing protocol). Published data do not show an unequivocal benefit for one of these three platforms in terms of overall survival, non-relapse mortality or disease recurrence. In this review, we discuss the pros and cons of these three different approaches to hHSCT with an emphasis on the significance of the existing data for children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation—clinical outcomes: impact of leg muscle strength

ObjectivesMuscle strength decline is reported to predict mortality in many cancers. However, there is little knowledge of the relation between muscle strength decline and clinical outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This study aimed to determine the impact of pre-transplant lower extremity muscle strength (LEMS) on post-transplant overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM).MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 97 adult patients underwent allo-HSCT during 2012–2020. LEMS was defined as knee extension force divided by patient’s body weight. The patients were divided into low and high LEMS groups based on pre-transplant LEMS. OS was measured using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. The cumulative incidence of NRM was evaluated using the Fine and Gray method, with relapse considered as a competing risk event.ResultsProbability of OS was significantly lower in the low LEMS groups (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.20 to 5.12, p=0.014) than in the high LEMS group on multivariate analysis. Five-year OS was 25.8% and 66.4% in the low and high LEMS groups, respectively. Risk of NRM was significantly higher in the low LEMS group (HR 4.49, 95% CI 1.28 to 15.68, p=0.019) than in the high LEMS group. The cumulative incidence of NRM was 41.4% and 11.1% in the low and high LEMS groups, respectively.ConclusionsPre-transplant LEMS was a significant factor in predicting OS and NRM.

Value of Autoantibody Expression During Long-Term Follow-Up in Paediatric ALL Patients After Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Objectives: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) shares many similarities with de novo autoimmune disorders, being associated with the presence of autoantibodies. However, data on the implication of autoantibodies in paediatric HSCT recipients are scarce. In this single-centre study of paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) surviving longer than 3 months, our objectives were to evaluate autoantibody expression and investigate the correlation with cGvHD and immune reconstitution using serially monitored parameters.Methods: We investigated circulating autoantibodies together with cellular and humoral parameters [including major T- and B-cell subsets, natural killer (NK) cells, and immunoglobulin levels] in 440 samples from 74 patients (median age 10.9 years, range 2.7–22.2 years) serially during long-term follow-up of median 8 years (range 0.4–19.3 years). Evaluations comprised of patient and transplant characteristics, precisely reviewed details of National Institute of Health (NIH)-defined cGvHD, and outcome data such as relapse, overall survival (OS) and mortality. Analysis of these clinical parameters was performed to identify possible associations.Results: Autoantibodies were detected in 65% (48/74) of patients. Anti-nuclear antibodies were the most common, occurring in 75% (36/48) of patients with autoantibodies. When comparing demographic data and transplant characteristics, there were no significant differences between patients with and without autoantibody expression; 5-year OS was excellent, at 96.4 and 95.8%, respectively. Neither the expression of autoantibodies nor the occurrence of cGvHD correlated with significantly worse OS or relapse rate. Furthermore, there was no significant association between autoantibody profiles and the incidence, overall severity or organ involvement of cGvHD. Patients with autoantibodies showed significantly better immune reconstitution, with overall higher numbers of T cells, B cells, and serum immunoglobulins. In autoantibody-positive patients with cGvHD, autoantibody production positively correlated with the expansion of CD56+ NK cells (236.1 vs. 165.6 × 103 cells/mL, respectively; p = 0.023) and with signs of B-cell perturbation, such as higher CD21low B cells (23.8 vs. 11.8 × 103 cells/mL, respectively; p = 0.044) and a higher ratio of CD21low B cells/CD27+ memory B cells (1.7 vs. 0.4, respectively; p = 0.006) in comparison to autoantibody-positive patients without cGvHD. Furthermore, when assessing the correlation between autoantibody positivity and the activity of cGvHD at time of analysis, indicators of aberrant B-cell homeostasis were substantiated by a lower proportion of CD27+ memory B cells (9.1 vs. 14.9%, respectively; p = 0.028), a higher ratio of class-switched CD27+IgD−/CD27+ memory B cells (3.5 vs. 5.1%, respectively; p = 0.013), significantly elevated numbers of CD21low B cells (36.8 vs. 11.8 × 103 cells/mL, respectively; p = 0.013) and a higher ratio of CD21lowB cells/CD27+ memory B cells (2.4 vs. 0.4, respectively; p = 0.034) in the active vs. the no cGvHD group. We then assessed the potential role of autoantibody expression in the context of elevated CD19+CD21low B cells (cutoff >7%), a well-known marker of cGvHD. Surprisingly we found a significant higher proportion of those cases where elevated CD21low B cells correlated with active cGvHD in samples from the autoantibody-negative group vs. the antibody-positive group (82 vs. 47%, respectively; p = 0.0053).When comparing immune parameters of the large proportion of survivors (89%) with the small proportion of non-survivors (11%), data revealed normalisation within the B-cell compartment of survivors: there were increased numbers of CD27+ memory B cells (54.9 vs. 30.6 × 103 cells/mL, respectively; p = 0.05), class-switched CD27+IgD− B cells (21.2 vs. 5.0 × 103 cells/mL, respectively; p < 0.0001), and immunoglobulin G4 (40.9 vs. 19.4 mg/dL, respectively; p < 0.0001). Overall mortality was significantly associated with an elevated proportion of CD21low B cells (13.4 vs. 8.8%, respectively; p = 0.039) and CD56+ NK cells (238.8 vs. 314.1 × 103 cells/mL, respectively; p = 0.019). In multivariate analysis, better OS was significantly associated with lower numbers of CD56+ NK cells [hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, p = 0.041] and higher numbers of CD27+ memory B cells [(HR) 1.62, p = 0.014].Conclusion: Our data shows that autoantibody profiles are not suitable biomarkers for diagnosing cGvHD in children or for predicting cGvHD severity, disease course and outcome. We identified a number of indicators of aberrant immune homeostasis associated with active cGvHD in paediatric ALL patients after HSCT. These findings confirm published results and suggest that candidate B cell subpopulations may serve as a surrogate measure for characterisation of cGvHD in paediatric HSCT for malignant diseases, and warrants confirmation in larger, multicentre studies.