A Multi-Center, Open-Label Study To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Pentostatin, Cytoxan, and Rituxan (PCR) in the Treatment of Previously Untreated or Treated, Stage III or IV, Low-Grade B-Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) or Bulky Stage II Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1354-1354
Author(s):  
Raul R. Mena ◽  
Neil P. Christiansen ◽  
Yudhishtra Markan ◽  
Lalita Pandit

Abstract The decision to treat indolent B-cell NHL is often based on progression of the disease. Most regimens have utilized fludarabine as the purine analog but the myelosuppression and immunosuppression of fludarabine combinations frequently results in severe infections. Combination therapy with pentostatin (P), a purine analog, cyclophosphamide (C), a DNA alkylator, and rituximab (R), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, based on the single-agent activities, documented synergy, and non-overlapping toxicity profiles, may represent a promising approach in the treatment of these patients. To further investigate the efficacy of the PCR regimen for the treatment of indolent NHL, we conducted a phase II study. Patients diagnosed of bulky stage II, stage III/IV low-grade NHL (REAL classification), previously untreated or treated, were eligible. All patients were treated with intravenous infusions of P (4 mg/m2), C (600 mg/m2), and R (375 mg/m2) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for at least 8 cycles. 2 additional cycles were given for patients with PR or SD after cycle 8 or patients with CR/CRu first evident at cycle 8. Clinical evaluation was performed after cycles 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 if necessary. Dose modification for hematologic toxicity may be increased to the previous higher level when a hematologic toxicity returned to normal. Two 25% dose reductions or one 50% dose reduction were allowed for nonhematologic toxicity. One hundred patients with indolent NHL, 68 previously untreated, 26 previously treated, and 6 with unknown treatment history, were enrolled in the study. The median age was 61 years (range 29–84) and 63.4% were ECOG PS 0, 36.6% PS1. A total of 550 cycles were given, with a median of 6 cycles per patient. 8 patients were not evaluated for response due to withdrawal of consent (n=1), unacceptable toxicities (n=3), and missing data (n=4). 92 patients received at least two cycles of treatment and were evaluated for response. The highest response rate (RR) achieved was 68%, with 10 (10%) CR, 12 (12%) CRu, 46 (46%) PR, 23 (23%) SD, and 1 (1%) disease progression. Stratified according to previous treatment status, patients with previously untreated NHL had an RR of 47% (CR, CRu 17%) while that of the previously treated was 17% (CR 7%). 14 (14.0%) patients discontinued treatment due to toxicities. Grade 3/ 4 hematological adverse events documented included 10 grade 4 and 16 grade 3 neutropenia. Infectious complications were noted in 8 patients including 3 grade 3 febrile neutropenia, 2 grade 4 febrile neutropenia, and 3 grade 3 infections. A total of 4 deaths were recorded, including 1 due to acute myocardial infarction, 1 suspected cardiac event and 2 unknown causes. This immunochemotherapeutic regimen is active in patients with indolent NHL. The study is currently on-going and updated results will be presented.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4709-4709
Author(s):  
Raul R. Mena ◽  
Neal P. Christiansen ◽  
Yudishtra Markan ◽  
Lalita Pandit

Abstract The decision to treat indolent B-cell NHL is often based on progressive disease, worsening symptoms, and increasing hematological derangement. When treatment is indicated, these lymphoproliferative disorders are very sensitive to combination chemotherapies utilizing pentostatin (P), a purine analog, cyclophosphamide (C), a DNA alkylator, and rituximab (R), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. P+C+R represents a promising approach in the treatment of these patients. Most regimens have utilized fludarabine (F) as the purine analog but the myelosuppression and immunosuppression of (F) combinations frequently results in severe infections. Eligibility criteria allow both treated and treatment-naïve patients diagnosed with Bulky Stage II or low-grade stage III/IV NHL (REAL classification) to be enrolled. Treatment consisted of intravenous infusions of P (4 mg/m2), C (600 mg/m2), and R (375 mg/m2) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for a total of up to 10 cycles. Clinical evaluation was performed after cycles 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 (if necessary). The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 76 NHL patients (median age 65, range 29–84) who received a total of 385 cycles (median 6 per patient). The ECOG status was 0 (64%), 1 (36%) and 2 (0%). The overall response rate (CR+Cru+PR) of the 69 evaluable patients was 72% (CR 11.6%, Cru 11.6%, PR 47.8%, SD 27.5% and PD or RD 1.4%). 12 grade 4 and 23 grade 3 neutropenias were documented. There were a total of 5 deaths due to acute myocardial infarction, NSCLC, a suspected cardiac event and 2 unknown cause of death. This immunochemotherapeutic regimen is active in indolent Grade III/IV NHL and the incidence of significant toxicities was low. Future trials evaluating the use of R as maintenance therapy following this PCR regimen may also be warranted with an eye toward increasing the overall survival of patients with NHL. The results will be updated at the meeting.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4750-4750
Author(s):  
Raul R. Mena ◽  
Neal P. Christiansen ◽  
David W. Nyman ◽  
Yudhishtra Markan ◽  
Naveed M. Chowhan

Abstract Introduction: The decision to treat indolent B-cell NHL is often based on progressing bulky disease, worsening symptoms, and increasing hematologic derangement. When treatment is indicated, these lymphoproliferative disorders are very sensitive to combination chemotherapies. Combination therapy with pentostatin (P), purine analog, cyclophosphamide (C), alkylator, and rituximab (R), anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, represents a promising new approach in the treatment of patients with low grade NHL. Most regimens have utilized fludarabine as the purine analog, but the myelosuppression and immunosuppression of these combinations frequently results in severe infections. We have previously reported our experience with pentostatin and rituximab in a cohort of 133 previously treated and untreated patients with Grade III/IV NHL or CLL (2005 Pan-Pacific Lymphoma Conference). Methods: Fifty-five patients have been enrolled in this study with an expected accrual of 100. Patients are being enrolled through the Pharmatech Research Network. Eligibility criteria allows previously treated and treatment naïve patients diagnosed with bulky stage II or low-grade stage III/IV NHL (REAL classification). Treatment consisted of intravenous infusions of P (4 mg/m2), C (600 mg/m2), and R (375 mg/m2) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for a total of 8 cycles. Clinical evaluation was performed after even-numbered cycles. Patients were stratified by disease and by prior treatment status. Results: Forty-seven patients have been eligible for evaluation. NHL patients (median age 64, range 30–84) received a total of 236 cycles (median 6). The ECOG status was 0 (65%) and 1 (33%). The overall objective response rate was 70% (CR 21%, Cru 13%, PR 36%). There were 3 grade 4 neutropenias documented and there was a single grade 4 leukopenia. There were a total of 3 deaths all of which occurred within 30 days of the last dose. The first death was due to a second primary, NSCLC, diagnosed after treatment began. The second death occurred in a 81 year-old female (PR) due to CHF and the last death, due to CAD, occurred in an 84 year-old woman (SD). Conclusions: This immunochemotherapeutic regimen is very active in indolent Grade III/IV NHL and the incidence of significant toxities was extremely low. Future trials evaluating the use of R as maintenance therapy following this PCR regimen may also be warranted with an eye toward increasing the overall survival of patients with NHL. The use of combination therapy in elderly patients should be used with caution due to associated co-morbidities.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1356-1356
Author(s):  
Raul R. Mena ◽  
Mehdi M. Moezi ◽  
Robert L. Robles ◽  
Maureen Cooper

Most treatment regimens for CLL are fludarabine-based regimen, which is highly myelosuppressive and immunosuppressive that frequently results in severe infections, especially among the elderly. Combination therapy with pentostatin (P), a purine analog, cyclophosphamide (C), a DNA alkylator, and rituximab (R), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, based on the single-agent activities, documented synergy, and non-overlapping toxicity profiles, may represent a promising approach in the treatment of these patients. To further investigate the efficacy of the PCR regimen for the treatment of CLL, we conducted a phase II study. Patients diagnosed of stage II, III or IV CLL (modified Rai classification), previously untreated or treated, were eligible. All patients were treated with intravenous infusions of P (4 mg/m2), C (600 mg/m2), and R (375 mg/m2) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for at least 8 cycles. 2 additional cycles were given for patients with PR or SD after cycle 8 or patients with CR/CRu first evident at cycle 8. Clinical evaluation was performed after cycles 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 if necessary. Dose modification for hematologic toxicity may be increased to the previous higher level when a hematologic toxicity returned to normal. Two 25% dose reductions or one 50% dose reduction were allowed for nonhematologic toxicity. Eighty-five patients with CLL, 61 previously untreated, 13 previously treated, and 11 with unknown treatment history were enrolled in the study. The median age was 64 years (range 35–83) and 66.7% were ECOG PS 0, 29.6% PS1, 3.7% PS 2. A total of 446 cycles were given, with a median of 6 cycles per patient. 69 patients received at least two cycles of treatment and were evaluated for response.16 patients were not evaluated for response due to deaths (n=3), withdrawal of consent (n=3), unacceptable toxicities (n=3), treatment delay (n=2), screening failure (n=1), missing data (n=3), administrative reason (n=1). The highest achieved response rate (RR) was 56.5%, with 11 (12.9%) CR, 8 (9.4%) CRu, 29 (34%) PR, 20 (23.5%) SD, 1 (1.1%) progressed. Stratified according to previous treatment status, patients with previously untreated CLL had an RR of 42.4% (CR, CRu 17.7%) while that of the previously treated was 4.7% (CR 1.2%). 11 (13.0%) patients discontinued treatment due to toxicities. Grade 3/ 4 hematological adverse events documented included 9 grade 4 neutropenia, 16 grade 3 neutropenia, 4 grade 3 anemia, 2 grade 4 anemia, and 5 grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Infectious complications were observed in 8 patients including 5 grade 3 febrile neutropenia, 1 grade 4 febrile neutropenia, and 1 grade 3 and 1 grade 4 infection. A total of 8 deaths, of which 6 were in elderly patients (>70 years old) were recorded, including 1 acute respiratory failure, 1 cholangiocarcinoma, 1 pulmonary edema, 2 sepsis, and 3 unknown causes. The PCR regimen is active patients with stage II, III, and IV CLL. The study is currently on-going and updated results will be presented.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8071-8071
Author(s):  
N. P. Christiansen ◽  
R. Mena ◽  
Y. Markan ◽  
L. Pandit

8071 Background: The decision to treat indolent B-cell NHL is often based on progressive disease, worsening symptoms, and increasing hematological variations. When treatment is indicated, these lymphoproliferative disorders are very sensitive to combination chemotherapies. Combination therapy with these agents, pentostatin (P), a purine analog, cyclophosphamide (C), a DNA alkylator, and rituximab (R), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, represents a promising approach in the treatment of these patients. Most regimens have utilized fludarabine (F) as the purine analog but the myelosuppression and immunosuppression of (F) combinations frequently results in severe infections. Methods: Eligibility criteria allow previously treated and treatment-naïve patients diagnosed with bulky stage II or low-grade stage III/IV NHL (REAL classification) to be enrolled. Treatment consisted of intravenous infusions of P (4 mg/m2), C (600 mg/m2), and R (375 mg/m2) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for a total of up to 10 cycles. Clinical evaluation was performed after cycles 2, 4, 6 and 8 and 10 (if necessary). Results: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 87 NHL patients (median age 62.5, range 29–84) who received a total of 476 cycles (median 6 per patient). The ECOG status was 0 (62.4%), 1 (37.6%) and 2 (0%). The overall response rate of the 80 evaluable patients was 72.5% (CR 11.3%, Cru 12.5%, PR 48.8%). 14 cases of grade 4 and 17 cases of grade 3 neutropenia were documented. There were a total of 4 deaths due to acute myocardial infarction, NSCLC, a suspected cardiac event and 1 unknown cause of death. Conclusions: This immunochemotherapeutic regimen is active in indolent Grade III/IV NHL and the incidence of significant toxicities was low. Future trials evaluating the use of rituximab as maintenance therapy following this PCR regimen may also be warranted with a future goal towards possibly increasing the overall survival of patients with NHL. The presented results are preliminary and the study is currently on-going. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 10-10
Author(s):  
Michael J Buege ◽  
Phuong H Dao ◽  
Esther Drill ◽  
Andréa C LeVoir ◽  
Terry Pak ◽  
...  

Introduction Part B of the modified Magrath regimen (ifosfamide, etoposide, and cytarabine; IVAC) with or without rituximab (R) is utilized as a standalone regimen in the management of relapsed/refractory Burkitt lymphoma and other non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). There are no comparative or prospective data and a paucity of retrospective, non-comparative data to support use of this regimen. A small retrospective study described second-line IVAC use without R in a mixed cohort of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or peripheral T-cell lymphoma, suggesting utility as a bridge to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) (Pereira J, et al. Leuk Res. 2006 Jun;30(6):681-5). The activity of this regimen in B-cell NHL, particularly in conjunction with R, and its toxicity remain incompletely described. In this study, we describe our institutional experience with IVAC +/- R in relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL. Methods We reviewed all patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL treated with IVAC +/- R between 1 January 2004 and 30 September 2019 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to assess efficacy and toxicity. Patients who received IVAC as part of sequential or alternating chemotherapy were excluded. Standard dosing consisted of ifosfamide 1500mg/m2 IV over 60min days 1-5, etoposide 60mg/m2 IV over 60min days 1-5, cytarabine 2000mg/m2 IV over 3 hours every 12 hours days 1-2, with or without rituximab 375mg/m2 IV day 0 or 1 in 21- to 28-day cycles (Lacasce A, et al. Leuk Lymphoma. 2004 Apr;45(4):761-7). Results Cohort and treatment characteristics are described in Table 1. Among 54 eligible patients (median age 51 years), 76% had DLBCL; 30% had lymphomatous central nervous system involvement at the time of initiating IVAC. Patients had received median 2 prior lines of therapy, with the last dose of the most recent line of therapy administered a median of 3 weeks prior to initiating IVAC. Patients received median 2 cycles of IVAC +/- R; 48% received IVAC-R. Prophylactic antimicrobials with cycle 1 were utilized in 94%. Most patients received herpesvirus- (81%) and Pneumocystis- (80%) directed prophylaxis; broad-spectrum prophylaxis with a fluoroquinolone was less common (24%). Primary granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) was utilized in 93% of patients with cycle 1; primary or secondary GCSF was utilized in 94% of cycles. Efficacy outcomes are described in Table 1. Objective response rate (ORR) among 46 evaluated patients was 48%; 17% achieved CR. ORR did not vary significantly between patients who did or did not receive R (58% vs 42%; p = 0.5) but was associated with number of IVAC cycles administered (among responders, 69% received 3-4 cycles while 31% received 1-2 cycles; p < 0.001). At median follow-up of 22 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.1 months and 4.9 months, respectively (Figure). In Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of survival, patients who received R with every cycle (p = 0.025) and received 3 or more cycles (p < 0.001) experienced significantly longer PFS. Patients who achieved CR (p < 0.001) or PR (p = 0.003), received R with every cycle (p < 0.001), received 3 or more cycles (p < 0.001), or underwent subsequent HCT or CAR-T cell therapy (p = 0.001) experienced significantly longer OS. Toxicity outcomes are described in Table 2. Grade ≥ 3 anemia (93%), neutropenia (94%), and thrombocytopenia (100%; all grade 4) were common, regardless of number of cycles received. Febrile neutropenia (FN) occurred in 65% of patients and complicated 47% of cycles; documented infection occurred in 44%. Risk of FN and infection did not appear to be influenced by use of antimicrobial or GCSF prophylaxis. Grade ≥ 3 elevations in AST/ALT or total bilirubin were uncommon (5.6% and 9.3%, respectively). Neurotoxicity attributed to cytarabine or ifosfamide occurred in 17% of patients and was usually low-grade; hemorrhagic cystitis occurred in one patient. In patients for whom cause of death was documented (n = 37), mortality was attributed to a treatment-related complication in 19%. Conclusion IVAC-R may be a useful bridging therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL who are planned for HCT. However, its potential for profound hematologic toxicity and life-threatening complications despite prophylactic measures requires careful consideration of less toxic alternatives. Disclosures Straus: Elsevier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: CME writer; Targeted Oncology: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Imedex, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; NY Lymphoma Rounds: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; OncLive: Speakers Bureau; ASH: Other: Conference in December 2019 on HL to other physicians during ASH; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7518-7518
Author(s):  
Michael Roost Clausen ◽  
Pieternella Lugtenburg ◽  
Martin Hutchings ◽  
Peter W. M. Johnson ◽  
Kim M. Linton ◽  
...  

7518 Background: Epcoritamab is a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody that induces T-cell–mediated killing of CD20–positive malignant B-cells. We present updated data, including progression-free survival (PFS) from the dose escalation part of the first-in-human phase 1/2 study of epcoritamab in pts with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL; NCT03625037). Methods: Adults with R/R CD20+ B-NHL received flat-dose 1 mL SC epcoritamab (step-up dosing approach) in 28-day cycles (q1w: cycles 1–2; q2w: cycles 3–6; q4w thereafter) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Step-up dosing and standard prophylaxis were used to mitigate severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Results: At data cut off (1/31/2021), 68 pts with B-NHL were enrolled across histologies including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 46 [67.6%]; de novo and transformed), follicular lymphoma (FL; 12 [17.6%]), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; 4 [5.9%]), and others (6 [8.8%]). Majority were heavily pretreated (median [range] prior lines: DLBCL, 3 [1–6]; FL, 4.5 [1–18]); including prior CAR-T (n = 6) and prior ASCT (n = 10). At median follow-up of 14.1 mo (DLBCL, 10.2 mo; FL, 15.2 mo), treatment was ongoing in 15 (22%) pts. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia (69%), CRS (59%), and injection site reaction (47%). CRS events were all grade 1 or 2 and most occurred in cycle 1; neurotoxicity was limited (6%; grade 1: 3%; grade 3: 3%; all transient). One case of tumor lysis syndrome was observed (1.5%; grade 3); there were no cases of febrile neutropenia or treatment-related death. Overall response is shown for DLBCL ≥12 mg and ≥48 mg and FL ≥12 mg, corresponding to the minimal efficacy threshold (Table). Responses deepened over time (PR converted to CR: DLBCL, 6 pts; FL, 3 pts). Median time to response was 1.4 mo (DLBCL) and 1.9 mo (FL). Among DLBCL pts achieving CR with ≥6 mg (n = 11), none relapsed while on treatment. The median PFS for pts with DLBCL ≥12 mg (n = 22) was 9.1 mo (95% CI: 1.6, NE; median follow-up 9.3 mo) and for pts with DLBCL ≥48 mg (n = 11) median PFS was not reached (median follow-up 8.8 mo). Updated analyses will be presented. Conclusions: With longer follow-up, SC epcoritamab demonstrated substantial single-agent activity, inducing deep and durable clinically meaningful responses, with a consistent safety profile. Notably no severe (grade ≥3) CRS events, no febrile neutropenia, and limited neurotoxicity was observed. Clinical trial information: NCT03625037. [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 944-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Lin ◽  
Beth Fischer ◽  
Mollie E. Moran ◽  
Maureen M. Buckner ◽  
Roshini Shank ◽  
...  

Abstract The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol was inactive when given by 24–72-hr infusion, but 1-hr IV bolus dosing demonstrated clinical activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Flavopiridol induces apoptosis independent of p53 and may be able to eliminate tumor cells resistant to fludarabine and rituximab. We performed a phase I dose escalation study of flavopiridol in combination with fludarabine and rituximab (FFR) in patients (pts) with MCL, CLL and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Pts had ANC ≥ 1500, hemoglobin ≥ 9.0, platelets ≥ 100,000, adequate organ function, and ECOG performance status 0–2, and provided informed consent. Pts received fludarabine 25 mg/m2 IV on day 1–5 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles. The planned dose escalation of flavopiridol was 50 mg/m2 by 1-hr IV bolus on day 1 (cohort 1), day 1–2 (cohort 2), or day 1–3 (cohort 3) of each cycle. Pts were placed on prophylactic Bactrim and Valtrex. Growth factor support was prohibited. Twenty-one pts were enrolled and are evaluable for toxicity and response. Median age was 62 years (range, 43–81), and 10 pts were male. Pts had the following diagnoses: CLL (8), MCL (5), follicular lymphoma (FL; 4), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL; 3), and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (1). Nine pts had received 1-2 prior therapies; 12 pts were previously untreated. CLL pts were Rai stage III/IV (5) or required treatment for Rai stage I/II disease (3) by NCI 96 criteria. NHL pts were stage III/IV (10) or had progressive stage II disease (3). Three pts were treated in cohort 1, and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was not observed. Six pts were treated in cohort 2. Two pts developed DLT; 1 pt developed grade 3 confusion and grade 3 seizures, and 1 pt developed nausea and diarrhea resulting in grade 3 acute renal failure. Three pts in cohort 2 did not receive flavopiridol after cycles 2, 2 and 3, due to life threatening tumor lysis in our single agent flavopiridol study. Twelve additional pts were enrolled at the cohort 1 dose level, to better define toxicity and efficacy. Pts received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–6), and 9 of 21 pts completed all 6 planned cycles. Therapy was stopped early due to cytopenias (7), infection (2), DLT (2) or progressive disease (1). One patient who received only 2 cycles of FFR due to cytopenias subsequently received 4 cycles of fludarabine and rituximab from his local oncologist. Response was graded by NCI 96 criteria (CLL) or IWG criteria (NHL). Overall response rate (ORR) was 90%; 15 pts achieved CR (71%), and 4 pts achieved PR (19%). Six pts relapsed a median of 7.5 months (range 4–18) after completing therapy; 13 pts remain in remission a median of 11 months (range 4–23) after completing therapy. Of note, all 9 MCL/FL pts responded (8 CR, 1 PR), and 8 pts remain in remission a median of 15 months (6–23) after finishing therapy. In conclusion, FFR exhibited significant clinical activity in a small group of pts, but cytopenias limited the administration of therapy. We are currently studying a modified FFR regimen administering a more active flavopiridol schedule (30-min IV bolus followed by 4-hr IV infusion) and allowing the use of prophylactic filgrastim, prior to phase II clinical study.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1358-1358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer R. Brown ◽  
Jonathan Friedberg ◽  
Yang Feng ◽  
Kimberly Phillips ◽  
Jennifer C. Clark ◽  
...  

Abstract The marginal zone lymphomas are a recently defined group of related diseases likely arising from a common cell of origin, the marginal zone B cell. The clinical presentation varies; data on therapy for subtypes other than gastric MALT has been largely limited to retrospective case series. We therefore undertook this prospective phase 2 study of fludarabine 25 mg/m2 for 5 days with rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 for the treatment of marginal zone lymphomas. To be eligible, patients were required to have newly diagnosed or relapsed, histologically confirmed MALT, marginal zone lymphoma, or a CD5/CD10 negative low-grade B cell lymphoproliferative disorder. They could not be candidates for curative local therapy. From 2004 to 2007, 26 patients were enrolled with a median age of 64 (31–84) and a median time from diagnosis to treatment of 1.6 months. This was the initial therapy for 21 of 26 patients (81%). Seven were diagnosed with MALT lymphomas (27%), 12 with nodal marginal zone lymphomas (46%), 3 with splenic marginal zone lymphoma (12%) and 4 with CD5/10 negative low-grade lymphoproliferative disorders (15%). FISH for BCL-6, trisomy 3, MALT1 and chromosome 1 rearrangements was attempted on 18 available tissue biopsies. Of these, four were normal, three showed BCL-6 rearrangement with other abnormalities, four had chromosome 3 abnormalities, two MALT1 rearrangements and one chromosome 1 abnormality. The majority of patients had stage IV disease (18; 69%), with 5 stage 3, 2 stage 2 and 1 stage 1E disease. Of the 23 patients who have completed therapy, 18 completed at least 4 cycles (78%), with 12 patients completing the planned 6 cycles (52%). Nine patients discontinued therapy due to unacceptable toxicity (39%), six for hematologic toxicity, two for grade 3 rash and one for a delayed grade 3 reaction to rituximab. Of 26 patients evaluable for toxicity, 46% developed grade 4 toxicity (solely hematologic), and 35% grade 3 toxicity. Grade 3–4 toxicities included: neutropenia 14 (54%), thrombocytopenia 5 (19%), febrile neutropenia 2 (8%), rash 3 (11%), myositis 1 (4%), allergic reaction 1 (4%). Two delayed opportunistic pneumonias were observed, one Nocardia and one P. jiroveci. The ORR in the 23 patients who have completed therapy and are evaluable for response is 83% (95% CI 61–95%), with 12 patients achieving CR/CRu (52%). Three patients have relapsed. Two patients have died, one due to small cell lung cancer diagnosed after study enrollment, and the other due to urosepsis with bone marrow aplasia. At the median follow-up of 1.8 years, the PFS is 84% (95% CI 68–99%), and OS 94% (95% CI 82–99%). Concurrent fludarabine and rituximab is therefore a highly effective regimen in the treatment of marginal zone lymphoma but one which is complicated by significant hematologic toxicity and allergic hypersensitivity. These toxicities prevented half the patients from completing the planned therapy and were more severe than usually seen in other low-grade lymphomas, emphasizing the need to study marginal zone lymphomas as a separate entity.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2834-2834
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Jones ◽  
Leslie Andritsos ◽  
Robert Baiocchi ◽  
Don M Benson ◽  
Kristie A. Blum ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2834 Background: A phase 2 study of flavopiridol administered according to a pharmacokinetically- (PK-) derived schedule has demonstrated significant activity in CLL, irrespective of high-risk genomic features. In combination with fludarabine and rituximab, flavopiridol has further shown promising activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). However, the safety and efficacy of single-agent flavopiridol administered on this schedule has not yet been characterized in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL. Methods: We conducted a standard cohorts-of-3 phase 1 trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of single-agent flavopiridol in each of 4 groups: indolent B-NHL, aggressive B-NHL, MCL, and T-NHL. Adult patients (age >18y) with previously-treated (T-NHL '1 prior; B-NHL ≥2 prior), preserved end-organ function, adequate hematologic parameters (unless attributable to disease), and preserved performance status (≤ECOG 2) were eligible. Further, pts were only eligible if they had exhausted all other therapeutic options. All pts signed informed consent. Flavopiridol was given as a 30 min loading dose followed by a 4 hr infusion weekly for 4 weeks of a 6 week cycle (max 6 cycles). Dose levels (DL) 1, 2, and 3 were 30 mg/m2 + 30 mg/m2, 30 mg/m2 + 50 mg/m2, and 50 mg/m2 + 50 mg/m2, respectively. The first infusion was administered in hospital, but treatment could continue outpatient thereafter. Pts received allopurinol, phosphate binders, and Kayexalate (if pre-treatment K+ >4.5) prophylaxis for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Steroid pre-medication and/or treatment for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was given at the discretion of the treating clinician. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was generally defined as any grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity not resolving to ≤grade 2 within 2 wks or any grade 4 hematologic toxicity (except leukopenia/neutropenia) resulting in >1 wk treatment delay. Results: 28 pts evaluable for toxicity have thus far completed cycle 1, which was used to define DLT: median age 66 years (range 34–84), 13 female (46%), median prior therapies 3 (range 1–8). All B-NHL patients received prior rituximab. Subsequent dose evaluation continues in the MCL and T-NHL arms. Across all pt groups, there were 11 pts at DL 1, 11 pts at DL 2, and 6 pts at DL 3. No DLTs have been observed to date. Median number of cycles received was 2. Seven pts completed all 6 cycles: 4 pts 30+30, 2 pts 30+50, 1 pt 50+50. Although no DLTs were observed, grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was seen in 26 pts: neutropenia (23 pts), thrombocytopenia (3 pts), and anemia (7 pts). Grade 3 neutropenic fever and infection, however, were only observed in 2 and 5 pts, respectively. Common grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included diarrhea (15 pts), fatigue (8 pts) and elevated transaminases (3 pts). Grade 3 CRS and TLS occurred in only 2 pts, both during cycle 1. Only 2 grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities (elevated transaminases, elevated lipase) were observed, both of which resolved without sequelae. Among pts completing ≥1 cycle, the most common reason for discontinuing treatment was disease progression (17 pts). One pt withdrew after diagnosis of a second cancer, 2 pts proceeded to transplant, and 2 pts withdrew for toxicity (1 persistent fatigue, 1 persistently elevated transaminases/malaise). Four pts expired on study: 3 progression, 1 sudden cardiac death unrelated to flavopiridol. Of 26 pts evaluable for response, 6 pts (21%) had partial responses: 2 follicular (30+30, 30+50), 1 SLL (50+50), 2 MCL (30+30, 30+50), and 1 DLBCL (50+50). Seven pts had stable disease for ≥1 cycle: 1 follicular (30+50), 1 MCL (30+30), 1 Richter's CLL (30+30), 1 DLBCL (50+50), and 3 PTCL (2 pts 30+30, 1 pt 30+50). Conclusions: Administered according to a PK-derived schedule, single-agent flavopiridol can be successfully delivered to multiply relapsed and/or refractory NHL pts with acceptable hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity. Both the promising activity and relative safety observed in these heavily pre-treated NHL pts warrant further investigation of this agent earlier in the course of disease and/or in combination with other agents, particularly in indolent B-cell and mantle cell NHL. Disclosures: Blum: Celgene : Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2749-2749
Author(s):  
John D. Hainsworth ◽  
Dana S. Thompson ◽  
F. Anthony Greco ◽  
Eric Raefsky ◽  
Scott Lunin ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2749 Background: Single-agent rituximab produces an overall response rate of approximately 50% and a median PFS of 9 months in patients with previously treated follicular NHL. Since resistance to rituximab eventually develops in nearly all patients, a number of novel agents are currently being evaluated in combination with rituximab to improve treatment efficacy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes angiogenesis and is increased in many tumor types. In NHL, high levels of VEGF are correlated with disease progression. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting VEGF, has extended PFS in several solid tumor types when added to combination chemotherapy. In this randomized phase II trial, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab + rituximab versus single-agent rituximab, in patients with previously treated follicular NHL. Methods: Eligible patients had follicular NHL (grade 1 or 2); NHL progression after either 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens; measurable or evaluable disease; and ECOG PS 0–2. Prior rituximab treatment was allowed as long as progression occurred > 6 months following completion of treatment. Patients were randomized to receive single-agent rituximab (Regimen A) or rituximab plus bevacizumab (Regimen B). All patients received 375 mg/m2IV of rituximab weekly for 4 weeks. Regimen B patients also received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV on days 3 and 15 during the 4-week course of rituximab. Response evaluations were performed at weeks 6 and 12 as well as 4 weeks after the completion of all therapy. Patients with objective response or stable disease at week 12 received 4 additional doses of rituximab administered at months 3 (week 12), 5, 7, and 9; in addition, regimen B patients received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks for a total of 16 doses (also beginning week 12). Addition of bevacizumab was hypothesized to improve the median PFS from 15 months to 20 months. Accrual of 90 patients (45/arm) was initially planned; the study was stopped early due to slow accrual. Results: Between 8/2005 and 3/2012, 60 patients were enrolled (Regimen A, 30; Regimen B, 29). Key clinical characteristics including age, performance status, FLIPI score, and previous treatment were comparable in the 2 treatment groups. 95% of patients had received 2 previous regimens, and 78% had received previous rituximab. After a median followup of 36 months, 92% of patients have either completed (40%) or discontinued treatment (lymphoma progression 30%, toxicity 12%, patient/physician decision 8%). The overall response rates were 42% in Regimen A (CR rate 10%) and 45% in Regimen B (CR rate 17%). The median progression-free survivals for Regimens A and B were 10.4 and 18.4 months, respectively (HR 0.33, p=0.0090). Median OS has not been reached for either group; at 3 years, the estimated OS rates are 54% (Regimen A) and 81% (Regimen B) (p=0.12). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was uncommon, with no grade 4 neutropenia or thrombycytopenia, and 1 episode of febrile neutropenia (Regimen B). No grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity occurred; grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity occurred in 3 patients (10%) on Regimen A (infusion reaction 1, hyperglycemia 1, pneumonia 1) and 7 patients (24%) on Regimen B (hypertension 3, epistaxis 1, abdominal wall hematoma 1, wound dehiscence 1, confusion 1). All 7 patients who discontinued treatment due to toxicity (3 during the first 12 weeks) were on regimen B; 5 had bevacizumab-related toxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: The addition of bevacizumab to rituximab was feasible with a modest increase in toxicity in this group of patients with previously-treated follicular NHL. The toxicities observed were consistent with the known profiles of each agent. While response rates were similar between regimens, the addition of bevacizumab lengthened the progression-free survival when compared to rituximab alone (median 18.4 vs. 10.4 months). Although results of this study must be interpreted with caution due to its small size, further study of VEGF- targeted therapies in NHL may be warranted. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Off-label bevacizumab use for treatment of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Reeves:Celgene: Equity Ownership.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document