A Pilot Study of Mycophenolate Mofetil for the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Graft-Versus-Host Disease.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4969-4969
Author(s):  
Chengwei Luo ◽  
Xin Du ◽  
Jianyu Weng ◽  
Rong Guo ◽  
Zesheng Lu

Abstract Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), which contribute to morbidity and mortality after transplantation. Approximately half of the patients that undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation develop severe acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease [Shulman HM et al. Am J Med, 1980], which varies with the degree of histoincompatibility, the recipient and donor ages, the source and quality of donor T lymphocytes, the incidence of cytomegalovirus infection,and type of GVHD prophylaxis strategy. The combination of immunosuppressive drugs, CsA and short-course MTX is a standard regiment for prevention of GVHD after BMT [Nademanee A et al. Blood, 1995], and have been shown in randomize trials to be superior to either drug alone in preventing severe GVHD [Storb R N Engl J Med.1986]. Although the efficacy of the regimens in preventing GVHD, the incidence reported for GVHD after transplantation is 38–68%. Each of these agents is also associated with significant organ toxicity. MMF is an new immunosuppressive drug, which selectively inhibits proliferation of T and B lymphocytes, formation of antibodies, and glycosylation of adhesion molecules by inhibition purine nucleotide synthesis and depleting the lymphocytes and monocytes of guanosine triphosphate. In patients undergoing renal and heart transplantation, it has been successfully used to prevent graft rejection [Lang P et al.Transplantation, 2005]. We compared the effects of MMF+ CsA+ MTX as GVHD prophylaxis vs CsA + MTX in patients undergoing allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. In all, 33 patients were enrolled in this study. The first group, of 16 patients, received CsA at 3mg/kg i.v. from day −1 to +30 day and MTX was on 15mg/m2 day +1 and 10mg/m2 day +3, +6, +11. The other group, of 17 patients received MMF 1g/d day −7 until day 0 and CsA + MTX. Here we used flow cytometric analysis technique to measure the changes of T cell subsets before and after treatment of MMF and CsA. Our study showed the incident of aGVHD is 25% when we combined standard GVHD proplylaxis with MMF after PBSCT, Which significantly reduce the risk of aGVHD than the combination of CsA and MTX (58.8%). Therefore, MMF is an effective drug in prophylaxis of aGVHD. Chronic GVHD is a late complication of PBSCT, Which develops approximately 30% in related donor HLA-matched allografts, and 60–70% in HLA-unmatched. The incident is not reduce with the development of aGVHD prophylaxis, Our result showed that the incident of cGVHD in research group (25%) is the same as the control group (23.5%). It seems that MMF is not reduce the incident of cGVHD, which may be different frome aGVHD. Our conclude that the number of CD3+ CD4+T cells decreased after the treatment of MMF, and those of CD3+ CD8+T cells increased,with reduction of the CD4+/CD8+ ratio. the number of CD25+ CD4+ and CD69+ CD8+ T cells were all increase. It seems that MMF may preferably effect on the CD3+CD4+T cells and the combination of MMF with CSA and MTX can significantly reduce the incidence of acute graft-vost-host diease, It appears to have a synergic action with CSA for the treatment of aGVHD.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4070-4070
Author(s):  
Jun Fang ◽  
Chenghao Hu ◽  
Mei Hong ◽  
Qiuling Wu ◽  
Yong You ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4070 Introduction: Enhanced risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) makes one of major critical barriers to successful unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (URD-HSCT). Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) has been combined to standard GVHD prophylaxis regimens and significantly reduced GVHD in URD-HSCT. But ATG is associated with increases of infections and post-transplant lympholiferative disease (PTLD). Thus it is valuable to find alternative immunosuppressive agent for GVHD prophylaxis in URD-HSCT. Basiliximab and daclizumab, two anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies, prevent graft failure in renal transplantation, which also effectively treat steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, only few researches report that anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies prevent GVHD. Here we firstly retrospectively explored the prophylactic effects of basiliximab or daclizumab against GVHD in 93 patients with hematological malignancies following unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (URD-PBSCT). Patients/methods: Between April 2004 and May 2011, 93 patients with hematological malignancies received basiliximab or daclizumab additional to standard GVHD prophylaxis regimens and underwent URD-PBSCT in our department. Their clinical data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All patients received GVHD prophylaxis regimen consisting of cyclosporine A, short-course methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil and an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody. Basiliximab was administrated to 71 patients at a dose of 20 mg, while daclizumab was given to 22 patients at a dose of 1 mg/kg on day 0 (2 hours before transplantation) and day +4. Eighteen patients were 8/8 identical, 41 were 7/8 identical and 34 were 6/8 identical at HLA-A,-B,-Cw and -DRB1. The median number of infused nucleated cells and CD34+ cells were 7.5×108/kg and 5.8×106/kg, respectively. Results: i) All the recipients achieved engraftment. The median time to neutrophil recovery and platelet recovery were 12 days and 15 days, respectively. The rates of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) were 35.5% and 18.3%, respectively. Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) developed in 43.4% of evaluable patients. The limited cGVHD rate was 27.6% and the extensive cGVHD rate was 15.8%. The transplantation-related mortality (TRM) was 19.4% while relapse rate (RR) was 10.8%. The 2-year overall survival (2-yr OS) reached 74.2% and disease free survival (2-yr DFS) accumulated to 69.6% during a median follow-up of 24 months. ii)The side effects of basiliximab and daclizumab were moderate and tolerable. The infectious rate was 66.7% including 44.1% bacterial infection, 10.8% probable or proven invasive fungal infection, and 11.8% mixed infection. The infection-related mortality was 7.5%. The CMV reactivation rate was 46.2% and only one patient suffered CMV pneumonia. Moreover there was no clinical evidence of PTLD. iii) There were no significant differences in aGVHD onset and survival between daclizumab and basiliximab group. However, basiliximab presented superior prophylactic effects on cGVHD than daclizumab (cGVHD rate, 31.1% versus 66.7 %, P=0.007). iiii) The aGVHD rate, cGVHD rate, RR, TRM, 2-yr OS and 2-yr DFS were compared among different HLA matching groups. There were significant differences in the occurrence of grade II-IV aGVHD (11.1% versus 36.6%, P=0.047) and cGVHD(18.8% versus 51.6%, P=0.03) between HLA 8/8 identical group and HLA 7/8 identical group. Comparing HLA 8/8 identical group versus HLA 6/8 identical group, there were not only significant decreases in the rate of grade II-IV aGVHD (11.1% versus 47.1%, P=0.01) and grade III-IV aGVHD (5.6% versus 32.4%, P=0.039), but also a significant increase in the RR (22.2% versus 2.9%, P=0.043). There were no significant differences between HLA 7/8 identical group and HLA 6/8 identical group. Interestingly, the survival was not significantly different among three HLA matching groups. Conclusion: Basiliximab or daclizumab prevents GVHD efficiently and feasibly following URD-PBSCT, especially in HLA identical or only one allele mismatched recipients. Furthermore, anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies benefit the outcome, even for those recipients with two or more HLA disparities. Basiliximab has similar effects on aGVHD prophylaxis but superior effects on cGVHD prophylaxis than daclizumab. Further prospective and randomized control studies are needed. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Drug: basiliximab (Simulect, Novartis Pharmaceuticals); daclizumab (Zenapax, Roche Pharmaceuticals). Purpose: for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis following unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 121 (18) ◽  
pp. 3745-3758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Blyth ◽  
Leighton Clancy ◽  
Renee Simms ◽  
Chun K. K. Ma ◽  
Jane Burgess ◽  
...  

Key Points Infusion of CMV-specific T cells early posttransplant does not increase acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease. CMV-specific T cells early posttransplant reduce the need for pharmacotherapy without increased rates of CMV-related organ damage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document