The Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Oral Monotherapy in Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Previously Treated with Bortezomib: Pooled Data from Two Phase II Studies (NHL-002 and NHL-003).

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1560-1560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig B. Reeder ◽  
T.E. Witzig ◽  
Julie M. Vose ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Rena Buckstein ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma that if not cured with aggressive chemoimmunotherapy and stem cell transplant is usually fatal. The intravenous proteasome inhibitor bortezomib produces an overall response rate (ORR) of 33% in patients with relapsed MCL (J Clin Oncol2006;24(30):4867–74). Unfortunately, most patients eventually relapse and new agents are needed for this disease. Two recently conducted phase II trials (NHL-002 and NHL-003) tested single-agent lenalidomide for patients with relapsed MCL. Fifty-four patients with MCL were enrolled into the two studies; 26% (14/54) had received prior bortezomib and they are the subject of this report. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory MCL and measurable disease 2 cm after at least one prior treatment regimen including prior bortezomib were eligible. Patients received 25 mg of lenalidomide orally once daily on days 1–21 of every 28-day cycle. Therapy was continued as tolerated or until disease progression. The 1999 IWLRC methodology was used to assess response and progression. Results: The 14 patients in this study were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 (2–6) prior treatments (including bortezomib) and 50% were bortezomib-refractory. Median age was 66 (45–84) years and 6 (43%) patients were female. Median time from diagnosis to lenalidomide treatment was 3.3 (0.7–7.6) years. The ORR with lenalidomide was 57% (8/14), including 21% (3/14) complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR and 36% (5/14) partial responses. One (7%) patient had stable disease. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (50%), thrombocytopenia (43%), anemia (21%), fatigue (21%), and leukopenia (21%). Neutropenic fever occurred in 7% of patients. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that lenalidomide oral monotherapy is very effective with manageable side effects in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL who had received prior treatment with bortezomib.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8533-8533
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Witzig ◽  
Julie Vose ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Thomas Matthew Habermann ◽  
Joseph M. Tuscano ◽  
...  

8533 Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with poor prognosis. The immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide shows consistent activity with tolerable safety in multiple phase II studies of relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL (NHL-002 and NHL-003) and MCL post-bortezomib (MCL-001). This pooled analysis further examined the efficacy and safety of single-agent lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. Methods: Single-agent lenalidomide was given 25 mg/d PO on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles as tolerated for 52 weeks (NHL-002) or until disease progression (NHL-003 and MCL-001). All MCL patients received ≥1 prior treatment, including bortezomib in MCL-001. Efficacy data were examined by independent central review for MCL-001 and NHL-003 and by investigators for NHL-002. Results: 206 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL were studied. The median age was 67 y (range 33-84; 63% ≥65 y), 91% stage III/IV disease and 51% had received ≥4 prior regimens (76% prior bortezomib). Overall response rate (ORR) with lenalidomide was 32% (10% CR/CRu), with a median time to response of 2.1 months and median duration of response (DOR) of 16.6 months (not yet reached in patients with CR/CRu; Table). Kaplan-Meier estimates for median PFS and OS were 5.4 and 23.9 months, respectively. Mean daily dose of lenalidomide was 21 mg. Grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (44%), thrombocytopenia (29%), anemia (11%), and fatigue (7%). Other any-grade AEs included tumor flare reaction (7%), venous thromboembolic events (7%), and invasive second primary malignancies (3%). Conclusions: Lenalidomide produced rapid and durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL, and exhibited a predictable safety profile among 3 phase II studies of lenalidomide in heavily pretreated patients, including prior treatment with bortezomib. Clinical trial information: MCL-001: NCT00737529; NHL-002: NCT00179660; NHL-003: NCT00413036. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Gunnellini ◽  
Lorenzo Falchi

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) comprises 3–10% of NHL, with survival times ranging from 3 and 5 years. Indolent lymphomas represent approximately 30% of all NHLs with patient survival largely dependent on validated prognostic scores. High response rates are typically achieved in these patients with current first-line chemoimmunotherapy. However, most patients will eventually relapse and become chemorefractory with poor outcome. Alternative chemoimmunotherapy regimens are often used as salvage strategy and stem cell transplant remains an option for selected patients. However, novel approaches are urgently needed for patients no longer responding to conventional chemotherapy. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug with activity in multiple myeloma, myelodisplastic syndrome and chronic lymphoproliferative disorders. In phase II studies of indolent NHL and MCL lenalidomide has shown activity with encouraging response rates, both as a single agent and in combination with other drugs. Some of these responses may be durable. Optimal dose of lenalidomide has not been defined yet. The role of lenalidomide in the therapeutic armamentarium of patients with indolent NHL or MCL will be discussed in the present paper.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 262-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Thomas E. Witzig ◽  
Julie M. Vose ◽  
Craig B. Reeder ◽  
Rena Buckstein ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is a type of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that typically responds to initial chemo-immunotherapy, but with a relatively short duration of response (DR) and progression-free survival (PFS) when treated with conventional chemotherapy agents. Although the overall survival (OS) of MCL has improved, most patients are not cured and new agents are needed. A sub-analysis of a recent phase II trial (NHL-002) investigating the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL, demonstrated a promising overall response rate (ORR) of 53% with a median DR of 11.9 months. A confirmatory international phase II trial (NHL-003) of single-agent lenalidomide was initiated for patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL that had received at least one prior treatment and had measurable disease. In this report, we analyze the current results from the MCL patients enrolled in this trial. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory MCL and measurable disease ≥2 cm after at least 1 prior treatment regimen were eligible. Patients received 25 mg of lenalidomide orally once daily on days 1–21 of every 28-day cycle. Patients continued therapy until disease progression or toxicity. The 1999 IWLRC methodology was used to assess response and progression. Results: This report focuses on the 39 MCL patients that were enrolled and evaluable for response assessment. Median age was 66 (33–82) years and 29 (74%) patients were male. Median time from diagnosis to lenalidomide treatment was 3.4 (0.4–9) years. Patients had received a median of 3 (1–8) prior treatments, and 23% (9/39) of patients had received prior bortezomib treatment. The ORR with lenalidomide was 41% (16/39), including 13% (5/39) complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR, and 28% (11/39) partial responses. Ten (26%) patients had stable disease. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (51%) and thrombocytopenia (25%), anemia (13%), fatigue (10%) and febrile neutropenia (10%). Conclusion: These results confirm that lenalidomide oral monotherapy is effective in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL, with manageable side effects.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18540-e18540
Author(s):  
Jennifer McQuade ◽  
Tahamtan Ahmadi ◽  
David L. Porter ◽  
Noelle V. Frey ◽  
Steven C. Goldstein ◽  
...  

e18540 Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a small B cell lymphoma, incurable with standard chemo-immunotherapy. There is no standard upfront therapy, although Phase II trials have shown a survival benefit to dose-intensified regimens in selected patients. However, many patients are not candidates for these regimens secondary to age or comorbidites. These patients are often treated with R-CHOP with consideration for consolidation with ASCT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis to describe and compare the survival experiences of MCL patients at the University of Pennsylvania treated in the first-line setting with R-CHOP (N=32) with or without autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The primary study endpoint was PFS as assessed by chart review and confirmed by SSDI database. Results: Median follow up for all pts was 2.5 years. The median age was 62.5, and 80% (n=30) were stage IV at diagnosis. 16 patients underwent consolidative ASCT. Comparing patients treated with R-CHOP vs R-CHOP +ASCT, there were no statistical differences in terms of age, ECOG PS, LDH, WBC, beta-2microglobulin, BM or GI involvement, bulky disease or blastoid variant at baseline. The response rate for all patients was 96.9% and 87.5% of patients achieved CR. Median PFS for all patients was 2.8 years: R-CHOP alone 1.9 years vs. R-CHOP+ ASCT 3.9 years (P=0.02, HR 3.44, 95%CI: 1.2-9.5). Conclusions: Outcomes are poor for MCL patients treated with R-CHOP with continuous recurrence despite excellent initial response. Our data suggest an improved PFS in patients with advanced MCL when R-CHOP is consolidated with ASCT in first remission as compared to R-CHOP alone. Prospective RCTs are needed to determine the optimum treatment for patients who are not candidates for dose-intensive therapy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 92 (10) ◽  
pp. E575-E583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Witzig ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
Joseph M. Tuscano ◽  
Johannes Drach ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2818-2818
Author(s):  
Vicki A. Morrison ◽  
Richard I Fisher ◽  
Andre Goy ◽  
Sven de Vos ◽  
Steven H. Bernstein ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2818 Background: The use of bortezomib-based therapy is known to be associated with an increased risk of HZ in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma, who have disease-related inherent immune defects. A 13% incidence of HZ occurrence in pts with relapsed/refractory MM who received single agent bortezomib has been previously reported (J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:4784-4790). However, the occurrence of HZ in bortezomib-treated pts with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has not been previously examined. Methods: We reviewed clinical data from two phase II trials in which bortezomib therapy was administered to pts with relapsed/refractory mantle cell NHL or indolent B-cell NHL. The occurrence of HZ complicating their treatment course was delineated, and an analysis for potential predisposing risk factors was undertaken. Results: A total of 236 relapsed/refractory pts, median age 65 years (yrs), enrolled on these trials was examined. Mantle cell NHL pts (n=155) received single-agent bortezomib, 1.3 mg/m2, days (D) 1, 4, 8, 11, 21-D cycles; those with indolent B-cell NHL (n=81) received either bortezomib, 1.3 mg/m2, D 1, 4, 8, 11, 21-D cycles, plus rituximab, 375 mg/m2, D 1, 8, 15 (cycle 1) and D 1 (cycle 2) (n=41), or bortezomib, 1.6 mg/m2, D 1, 8, 15, 22, 35-D cycles, and rituximab, 375 mg/m2, D 1, 8, 15, 22 (cycle 1) (n=40). HZ occurred in 24 pts (10.2%) overall, with a comparable incidence in both disease subgroups. Median time to HZ occurrence was 39 (range, 11–206) days (< 2 cycles). Overall, 11% of pts had had a prior episode of HZ. Baseline demographic and clinical variables were examined, including age, gender, disease stage, baseline absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, prior HZ, and number and types of prior therapies, to determine if any may predict for subsequent development of HZ. With regard to age, 71% of pts with HZ were age ≥65 yrs, compared to 48% without HZ (p=0.03). 63% of pts with HZ had received ≥2 lines of prior therapy, compared to 47% in those without HZ (p=0.15). 4% of pts with HZ had undergone prior stem cell transplantation, compared to 13% of pts without HZ. Of the pts with HZ, 25% had received prior purine analog therapy, compared to 9% of pts without HZ. The other baseline variables had no impact on the occurrence of HZ. In the 77 pts who responded to bortezomib protocol therapy (complete/partial responses), the incidence of HZ was 14%, compared to an 8% incidence of HZ in the 159 non-responders (p=0.15). Conclusions: HZ may complicate the course of relapsed/refractory indolent or mantle cell NHL pts receiving bortezomib-based therapies, with an incidence similar to the myeloma population. Pts who are elderly, more heavily-pretreated, or have received prior purine analog therapy may be at greater risk of this complication, and should be strongly considered for antiviral prophylaxis during such therapy. Disclosures: Morrison: Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Discussion of Velcade in NHL subtypes other than mantle cell lymphoma is included. Fisher:Allos Therapeutics: Consultancy; CytoKinetics: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; MundiPharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc,: Consultancy. Goy:Millennium, Celgene, GSK and Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Bernstein:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Boral:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership. Neuwirth:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3028-3028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyebin Park ◽  
Donglu Zhao ◽  
George Tsourdinis ◽  
Zhishuo Ou ◽  
Archito T. Tamayo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma with poor outcome and therapeutic challenge. Oral single-agent ibrutinib, a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, elicited a response rate of 68% in phase II clinical trial and has been approved by FDA for the treatment of MCL patients who received at least one prior therapy. To increase the possibility of therapeutic potential, the investigation of BTK-dependent/independent signaling pathways is needed. Methods and Results Using both established MCL cell lines and primary MCL cells as a model system, our data demonstrated that ibrutinib effectively inhibited BTK phosphorylation along with quick STAT3 inactivation within 30 minutes of ibrutinib incubation at a dose lower than 100nM. Since the results clearly indicated that ibrutinib inhibited both BTK and STAT3 activation in MCL cells, we next elucidated the function and action between BTK and STAT3. Using a validated BTK-specific siRNA, we knocked down BTK to test the legitimacy of the relationship between BTK and STAT3. The results showed that transient knockdown of BTK significantly inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation in MCL cells. Next, the results from both immunoprecipitation and confocal microscopy showed that STAT3 was BTK-associated transcription protein indicating that BTK could function as a kinase upstream of STAT3, in a similar manner to the JAK/STAT pathway. Since STAT3 is predominately known as the downstream protein of the IL-6/JAK pathway, we examined whether there is a cross-talk between the BTK-STAT3 and the JAK-STAT3 pathways in MCL cells. After stimulation of MCL cells with IgM or IL-6, ibrutinib only inhibited IgM-induced STAT3 activation but not IL-6-induced STAT3 activation. Even with an increased dose of ibrutinib, the basal level of STAT3 phosphorylation remains detectable in MCL cells due to IL-6 autocrine. However, ibrutinib plus JAK inhibitor completely inactivated STAT3 and synergistically inhibited the growth of MCL cells. These data indicate that there are two independent pathways, BCR-BTK and IL6-JAK, which lead to STAT3 activation without cross-talk in MCL cells. Conclusions Our results may lead to the development of more effective combination therapy to block both BCR-BTK and IL-6-JAK signaling pathways for relapsed or refractory MCL. Disclosures Wang: Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4480-4480
Author(s):  
Seah H. Lim ◽  
William V. Esler ◽  
Yana Zhang ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Phillip O. Periman ◽  
...  

Abstract Although autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) may benefit patients with relapsed or high risk non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), many patients still relapse and die of their disease. Most relapses occur during the first three years after transplant. In an attempt to reduce disease relapses, we have applied a maintenance regimen to patients after ASCT for B-cell NHL. In this regimen, all patients received low dose rituximab infusion (375 mg/m2 for one day only) every three months starting D+100 for a total of 2 years or until disease relapse. We reasoned that rituxan infusion given for only one day every three months may be sufficient to prevent disease relapse during this post-transplant period when any residual tumor bulk is likely low. Fifteen patients (eight men, seven women) with high-risk B-cell lymphoma have been treated. Their diagnoses: advanced mantle cell lymphoma in first complete remission (CR1) (8), refractory advanced marginal zone lymphoma (2), refractory follicular large cell lymphoma (1), high risk T-cell rich B-cell NHL in CR1 (1), Stage IV diffuse large cell lymphoma in CR1 (1) and relapsed B-cell NHL in CR2 (2). The median age was 59 years (range 38–72 years). CR was achieved using R-CHOP (10) or R-DHAP/R-ICE (5) and autologous hematopoietic stem cells were harvested during hematopoietic recovery from the last course of chemo-immunotherapy. With a median follow-up of 46 months (range 12–66) for the group and 47 months (range 16–66) for patients with advanced mantle cell lymphoma, the projected 5.5 years relapse-free survival for the group is 100% and the overall survival 80%. Two patients with mantle cell lymphoma died, one due to metastatic breast cancer and another a stroke at 40 and 41 months respectively. Unlike patients who underwent ASCT without rituximab, in whom B-cell recovery occurred between 3–6 months, we observed severe delays in the immunoglobulin recoveries in these patients (Figure 1). With a median immunoglobulin follow-up of 28 months (range 6–64), none of the fifteen patients showed normalization of total IgG. Two patients achieved a normalized total IgA and two a normalized total IgM. This hypogammaglobulinemia persists beyond the rituxan maintenance period. The median time to attainment of 75% normal level of immunoglobulin is 36 months for IgG, 48 months for IgA and not reached for IgM. The severe immunoglobulin deficiencies may be clinically relevant. Six of fifteen patients developed recurrent upper respiratory tract infection. No fatal infection was observed among any of the patients. Our results, therefore, suggest that low dose rituximab administration every three months after ASCT for high-risk B-cell lymphoma may prevent lymphoma relapse. However, this is associated with severe and prolonged delays in immunoglobulin recovery beyond the rituxan maintenance period. Careful monitoring of the immunoglobulin recovery and intervention as appropriate should be done routinely in these patients. Figure Figure


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3570-3570
Author(s):  
Jennifer McQuade ◽  
Tahamtan Ahmadi ◽  
David Porter ◽  
Noelle Frey ◽  
Alison Wakoff Loren ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3570 Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a small B cell lymphoma, incurable with standard chemo-immunotherapy. The best initial treatment regimen remains unclear. Although it is generally acknowledged that aggressive approaches using combination chemotherapy and/or high dose chemotherapy can prolong survival, consensus on upfront treatment strategies for advanced MCL is currently lacking without randomized controlled data to guide treatment decisions. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis to describe and compare the survival experiences of MCL patients at the University of Pennsylvania treated in the first-line setting with R-HCVAD (N=43) with or without autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or Rituximab maintenance. The primary study endpoints were PFS and OS as assessed by chart review and confirmed by SSDI database. Median follow up for all pts was 3 years. The median age was 53.7, and 76.7 % (n=33) were stage IV at diagnosis. 15 patients underwent consolidative ASCT. 11 pts received Rituximab maintenance. Comparing patients treated with R-HCVAD vs R-HCVAD + R maintenance vs. R-HCVAD + ASCT, there were no statistical differences in terms of age, ECOG PS, LDH, WBC, beta-2microglobulin, BM or GI involvement, bulky disease or blastoid variant at baseline. Median PFS for all patients was 3.9 years: R-HCVAD alone 2.1 years vs. R-HCVAD+R 3.9 years (P=0.02, HR 3.51, 95%CI: 1.2–10.2) vs R-HCVAD + SCT not reached (p=0.017, HR 3.7, 95%CI: 1.26–10.63). PFS survival rates at 2 years were 50%, 88% and 70%; 33%, 71/% and 63% respectively at 3 years, and 0%, 33% and 33 % at 5 years. 3 year OS for all patients was 84% (95% CI: 65–94) with no significant differences among the three approaches. Notably, only 1/8 patients treated with R-HCVAD + SCT relapsed after 2 years, with a median follow up of 4.8 years for these patients. Our data suggest a further improved PFS when R-HCVAD is consolidated with either Rituximab maintenance or ASCT. While neither of the two consolidative approaches appears superior in our limited data set, both show significant PFS prolongation when compared to R-HCVAD alone. Further prospective investigation of consolidative approaches after RHCVAD in a randomized fashion is warranted. Figure 1: Figure 1:. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document