Treatment Outcome of Steroid-Refractory Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease with Weekly Rituximab Followed by Maintenance Rituximab: a KSBMT Multicenter Phase II Study.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1151-1151
Author(s):  
Seok Jin Kim ◽  
Chang Ki Min ◽  
Jong Wook Lee ◽  
Bin Cho ◽  
Chul Won Jung ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1151 Poster Board I-173 Introduction The mainstay of treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is steroid. However, there is limited treatment option for steroid-refractory chronic GVHD. Although the pathogenesis of chronic GVHD is still uncertain, the possible relation of auto-antibodies with chronic GVHD (Patriarca F, et al. Exp Hematol 389-96, 2006) and the result from a previous pilot study (Cutler C, et al. Blood 756-762, 2006) suggested that a treatment strategy targeting against B cells might become another effective therapy for chronic GVHD. Thus, we performed a study to determine the efficacy of rituximab (Mabthera®, Roche), an anti-CD20 monoclonal chimeric antibody in patients with steroid-refractory chronic GVHD. Patients and methods This is a multicenter, open-labeled prospective phase II study performed by the Korean Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (NCT00472225). Patients should be diagnosed as chronic GVHD according to the criteria for clinical trials in chronic GVHD proposed by National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project (Filipovich AH, et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 945-56, 2005). The steroid-refractoriness was defined as the same severity during the last one month while patients received the equivalent of prednisone ≥0.5mg/kg per day or 1mg/kg every other day at least for 30 days or longer. The treatment schedule consists of induction (rituximab 375mg/m2 weekly IV for 4 consecutive weeks) and maintenance (rituximab 375mg/m2 monthly IV for 4 consecutive months). The response and the quality of life (SF36 questionnaire) were evaluated during the follow-up. Results 37 patients (20 male, 17 female) were evaluated, and their median age was 29 years (range 8-57 years, 7 patients from pediatrics and 30 from internal medicine). The time interval between transplantation and rituximab treatment was from 4.0 to 45.7 months. The most commonly involved organs were skin, oral cavity, eyes and lungs. The average number of involved organ per each patient was three and their average severity was grade 2-3. The median potential follow-up was 12.3 months (95% confidence interval: 12.06-12.54 months). The maximum response during follow-up was as follows: 8 complete response (21.6%), 22 partial response (59.5%), 6 no response (16.2%), and 1 disease progression (2.7%). Thus, the overall response rate was 81.1%. The dosage of steroid was reduced in all responders including complete withdrawal of steroid. The quality of life was improved in terms of physical health and mental/emotional health after treatment. However, 5 responders showed the progression of disease activity during follow-up, and infectious complications were life-threatening, thus, 8 patients died due to infections including pneumonia. The involvement of skin and oral cavity showed better response than the involvement of lungs and eyes. Conclusion The weekly administration of rituximab followed by monthly maintenance rituximab may be an effective treatment for steroid-refractory chronic GVHD, however, the active prophylaxis against infection should be considered. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1410-1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Lutz ◽  
Markus Kapp ◽  
Hermann Einsele ◽  
Götz Ulrich Grigoleit ◽  
Stephan Mielke

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2491-2491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Reshef ◽  
James K. Mangan ◽  
Selina M. Luger ◽  
Alison Wakoff Loren ◽  
Elizabeth O. Hexner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Blocking lymphocyte trafficking after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) may prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) without interfering with graft-versus-tumor (GvT) activity. We previously reported that brief (up to day+30) CCR5 blockade using maraviroc (MVC, Pfizer) after reduced-intensity conditioned (RIC) alloSCT resulted in a low incidence of acute GvHD and absence of early liver and gut GvHD, although delayed GvHD still occurred. We designed a phase II study to test the hypothesis that extended administration of MVC would be feasible, safe and provide protection against late-onset GvHD without impairing immune reconstitution or GvT responses. Patients and Methods: In April 2013 we initiated a 37-patient (pt) phase II study to test an extended course of MVC in recipients of RIC alloSCT from unrelated donors. Pts receive fludarabine 120 mg/m2 and busulfan i.v. 6.4 mg/kg followed by peripheral blood stem cells. MVC 300 mg b.i.d. is orally administered from day -3 to day +90 in addition to standard prophylaxis with tacrolimus and methotrexate. The primary endpoint is the cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GvHD by day 180. As of July 2014 we enrolled 20 pts at high risk for transplant-related toxicity by virtue of age (median=64, range 55–72), donor source (matched unrelated 80%, single-antigen mismatch unrelated 20%) or comorbidities (comorbidity index: low 15%, intermediate 35%, high 50%). Underlying diseases were AML (16), MDS, MPD, ALL and CTCL (1 each). Feasibility and Safety: The median follow-up on surviving patients is 5.7 months. The 3-month course of MVC was well tolerated with no increased toxicity; two pts did not complete their treatment due to early disease relapse and one patient discontinued therapy due to a skin reaction with eosinophilia where the histological features favored a drug reaction and the attribution to MVC was possible. Postural hypotension, a known dose-dependent toxicity, was observed in one pt who completed the course with a 50% dose reduction. Engraftment and Immune Reconstitution: The median time to ANC>500/μL was 12 d (range 10-21) and platelets>20k/μL was 14 d (range 9-28). The median whole blood and T-cell donor chimerism levels at day 100 were 95% (range 12–100%) and 80% (range 23–94%) respectively, which are similar to historical rates. Median CD4 counts on day 30 were 341 (range 206-424). Only 3/16 evaluable pts had Ig levels<500 mg/dL in the first 100 days. GvHD: Sixteen pts are evaluable with > 3 mo of follow-up. The day-180 cumulative incidence rates (± s.e.) of grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 acute GvHD are 25 ± 11% and 6 ± 6% respectively (Fig. 1). Of patients who developed acute GvHD in the first 180 days, there have been no cases of liver GvHD, 2 cases of stage 1 steroid-responsive gut GvHD and 1 case of severe diarrhea with combined features of GvHD and leukemic infiltrates in the gut. These results are comparable to the GvHD rates in our phase I/II MVC study (grade 2-4: 23.6% and grade 3-4: 5.9%), which included related and unrelated donor transplants. These results also compare favorably with a 45% day-180 acute GvHD rate seen in similar patients treated with our standard GvHD prophylaxis alone. Notably, there has been no treatment-related mortality. Five patients have relapsed at a median of 2.6 months post-transplant (range 0.93 – 3.5), which is similar to our historical rates after RIC alloSCT. PD analysis: We developed a phosphoflow assay to assess in real-time the activity of MVC in fresh blood samples. The assay quantifies the activation of CCR5 by measuring the phosphorylation of C-terminal serine residues as a result of CCL4 stimulation. In 15 evaluable patients, we observed diminished pCCR5 levels with CCL4 stimulation on day 0 as compared to day -6 (Fig. 2). In summary, our preliminary results support the feasibility, safety and protective activity of the CCR5 antagonist MVC against acute GvHD, with preferential activity against visceral GvHD. Continued pt enrollment and follow-up are ongoing. Updated safety, efficacy and PD results will be presented. A multi-center study (BMT-CTN 1203) will be initiated later this year to further clarify the role of this novel strategy in improving the outcome of alloHSCT. Fig 1. Cumulative Incidence of Acute GvHD Fig 1. Cumulative Incidence of Acute GvHD Fig 2. Phosphoflow shows CCR5 unresponsiveness to CCL4 stimulation on day 0 Fig 2. Phosphoflow shows CCR5 unresponsiveness to CCL4 stimulation on day 0 Disclosures Reshef: Pfizer: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Maraviroc for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 639-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Martínez ◽  
Carlos Solano ◽  
Christelle Ferrá ◽  
Antonia Sampol ◽  
David Valcárcel ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2889-2889
Author(s):  
Dong Won Baek ◽  
Joon Ho Moon ◽  
Jae-Sook Ahn ◽  
Seong Kyu Park ◽  
Ik Chan Song ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), where T- and B-cells derived from the graft attack host, is still a vital hurdle to overcome for successful allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). In particular, chronic GVHD (cGVHD) occurs approximately 30-70% of the patients and it is the most relevant cause of non-relapse morbidity (NRM) after allo-SCT. This multicenter, phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of imatinib mesylate in patients with steroid-resistant cGVHD. In addition, we scored the quality of life of the enrolled patients using Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36). Patients and methods A total of 36 patients who diagnosed with steroid-refractory cGVHD participated in this study and treated with imatinib from March 2013 to February 2019. Enrolled patients received 100mg of imatinib daily for 2 weeks. Every 2 weeks, imatinib dosage was increased up to 400 mg/day if the patients did not have any grade 3-4 adverse event. Patients who showed stable disease (SD), partial remission (PR) and complete remission (CR) in the 3-month response evaluation continued the imatinib up to 6 months. Treatment response was evaluated every 2 weeks for 6 months according to the NIH global scoring system. Survival outcomes of the enrolled patients were followed up to 2 years. Quality of life was also evaluated using SF-36 at 1, 3, and 6 months after starting imatinib treatment. Response of cGVHD was evaluated based on the NIH response criteria by scoring each involved organ sites with four-point scale (0-3). CR was defined as resolution of all reversible manifestations related to cGVHD. Partial response (PR) of cGVHD was defined clinical score reduction of at least one point in one or more affected organs. Disease progression or treatment failure was defined as increased score at least one point in one or more organs or occurrence of any new symptoms or signs of c GVHD. Failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the day of starting imatinib. Result Median age was 47.5 years (23-63). Majority of the patients were diagnosed with acute leukemia (75%) and myelodysplastic syndrome (16.9%), and underwent allo-SCT in CR disease status (69.5%). Twenty-five (69.4%) patients experienced acute GVHD. Most of the patients presented overlap symptoms. Skin GVHD was identified in 23 (63.9%) patients. Lung, mouth, and eye involvement were found in 16 (44.4%), 14 (38.9%), and 14 (38.9%) patients, respectively. All of the enrolled patients had been treated with steroid due to moderate (55.6%), and severe (44.4%) grade cGVHD. Overall, median duration of imatinib therapy was 5.4 months and no severe adverse effect over grade 3 was reported. The last therapeutic mean dosage of imatinib was 305.6 mg/day. Three patients (8.3%) achieved CR, and 18 (50%) and 12 patients (33.3%) were reported as PR and SD. Treatment failure was identified in three patients (8.3%). Overall response rate (ORR) of imatinib was 58.3% and 25 patients (69.4%) could reduce the steroid. According to the each involved organ site, ORR of the gastrointestinal (GI) and liver cGHVD were 70.5% and 66.7%, while skin and lung were 34.8% and 25.0%, respectively. The efficacy of imatinib was better in GI, liver, and mouth than skin and lung in the current clinical study. With the median follow-up duration of 28.5 months, two-year FFS and OS rate were 76% and 88.5%. Responders to the imatinib therapy showed a superior tendency in OS than non-responders (p = 0.066). In the patients-reported QOL evaluation with SF-36, both physical and mental component score were improved. Particularly, a factor representing emotional well-being was significantly improved (p = 0.002). Conclusion This multicenter clinical study showed that imatinib is an effective option not only for skin GVHD but also for GI and liver involvement. Moreover, QOL of the patients tended to improve during imatinib treatment with steroid dose reduction. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lee: Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Korean Society of Hematology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella de Vere Hunt ◽  
James M. Kilgour ◽  
Robert Danby ◽  
Andy Peniket ◽  
Rubeta N. Matin

Abstract Background Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. These patients face unique challenges due to the complexity of GVHD which can affect multiple organ systems, and the toxicity of treatments. Despite the known impact on quality of life (QOL), qualitative data within the bone marrow transplantation (BMT) literature is rare, and there has been no qualitative work exploring patient experience of specialist healthcare provision for GVHD in the United Kingdom. Methods We conducted a primary explorative qualitative study of the experience of QOL issues and multidisciplinary care in patients with chronic GVHD following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Eight patients were identified using convenience sampling from specialist BMT outpatient clinics. Following consent, patients were interviewed individually via telephone. Transcripts of interviews were analyzed using an inductive thematic approach. Results Mean participant age was 61-years-old (range 45–68), with a mean time post-transplant of 3 years at time of interview (range 3 months–15 years). Five key QOL themes were identified: (1) ‘Restricted as to what I can do’; (2) Troubling symptoms—‘you can sort of get GVHD anywhere’; (3) Confusion/uncertainty over GVHD symptoms—‘Is this the GVHD?’; (4) Unpredictable course and uncertainty about the future; and (5) Adapting to the sick role. In addition, four themes related to experience of service provision were identified: (1) personal care and close relationship with BMT nurses; (2) efficiency versus long waits—‘On the case straight away’; (3) information provision—‘went into it with a bit of a rosy view’; and (4) the role of support groups. Conclusions These qualitative data reflect the heterogeneity of experiences of the GVHD patient population, reflecting the need for a flexible and nuanced approach to patient care with emphasis on comprehensive information provision. We have identified the key role that BMT specialist nurses within the multidisciplinary team play in supporting patients. We advocate future research should focus on ways to meet the complex needs of this patient group and ensure that the personal care and close relationships are not lost in service redesigns embracing remote consultations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document