Graft-Failure After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Outcome and Prognostic Factors in 80 Patients

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1936-1936
Author(s):  
Christelle Ferrà ◽  
Jaime Sanz ◽  
Miguel-Angel Díaz-Pérez ◽  
Mireia Morgades ◽  
Jorge Gayoso ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1936 Background and aims: Graft-failure (GF) is an infrequent and poor complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Strategies for reversing GF will depend on the options available in each situation. Patients and Methods: A questionnaire about GF was sent to all centers of the Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético (GETH). Fourteen Spanish institutions reported their GF from January 2006 to October 2010. Primary GF was defined as ANC >0.5×109/L not reached for three consecutive days by day +28 after SCT from peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) progenitors and by day +60 after SCT from unrelated cord blood (UCB) progenitors. Secondary GF was defined as a recurrent ANC <0.5×109/L for at least 7days. Results: Eighty patients with GF were reported (median age 34 yr. [range: 1–68]; 54M/26F). Basal diseases were AML 30 (38%), ALL 14 (17%), lymphoproliferative disorder 12 (15%), myelodysplastic syndromes 9 (11%), myeloproliferative syndromes 7 (9%), aplastic anemia 5 (6%), and congenital disorders 3 (4%). Status of the neoplastic disease was: 1st/2nd CR or 1st chronic phase in 50 (62%) patients and >2nd CR or active disease in 30 (38%) patients. Conditioning therapy for 1st SCT was myeloablative in 45 (56%) and non-myeloablative in 35 (44%) patients. Donors were related in 35 (44%) and unrelated in 45 (56%). Progenitors were from mobilized PB in 45 (56%), UCB in 26 (33%) and BM in 9 (11%). At the time of GF, chimerism status (n=75) was donor complete in 6 (8%), mixed in 28 (35%) and from the patient in 41 (55%) individuals. Forty-five (56%) and 35 (44%) patients presented primary and secondary GF. Seventy-one patients received a second SCT from the same donor (31 patients [44%]), from a different donor (35 patients [49%]) or an autologous back-up (5 patients [7%]). The most frequent conditioning regimens (n=65) in second allogeneic stem cell infusion were fludarabine+ thymoglobulin (ATG) (19 [29%]), anti-lymphocyte immunoglobulin alone (9 [14%]) and cyclophosphamide+ATG (6 [9%]). ATG or alemtuzumab were used in 52 patients (80%) as part of the preparative regimen. Progenitors were from mobilized PB in 52 (79%), UCB in 8 (12%) and BM in 6 (9%) patients. Eleven (20%) and 2 (4%) out of 55 evaluable patients presented again primary or secondary GF. The median survival time from GF was 12 months [range: 1–23].The 5-yr. probability of survival was 28% (95%CI: 14%–42%) with a median follow-up for alive patients of 27 months [range: 1–103]. The 5-yr. non-relapse mortality was 47% [35%–59%]. There was a trend for a better survival in patients under 18 years-old. No other factors such as graft source, in vivo T-cell depletion or the conditioning regimen influenced on patient's survival. By competing risk estimation, the transplant-related mortality and the relapse probability at 5 years in the 66 patients that received a second transplant were 51% [95%CI: 38% – 63%] and 24% [95%CI: 10% – 41%]. Conclusions: The prognosis of GF after allogeneic SCT was poor, although some patients presented long survival if successful recovery of GF was obtained. The strategy adopted to treat GF has been heterogeneous. Younger age showed a trend for better survival in this series. Supported by grants P-EF/10 from FIJC and RD06/0020/1056 from RETICC. Disclosures: Sanz: Novartis: Speakers Bureau.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5372-5372
Author(s):  
Yi Luo ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Zhen Cai ◽  
Yamin Tan ◽  
Xiaoyan Han

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fludarabine-based non-myeloablative conditioning regimen in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT)from related and unrelated donor for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase(CML-CP). Methods: Fifteen consecutive patients with CML-CP between May, 2005 and July, 2006 were treated with a single non-myeloablative conditioning regimen in this study. They were 10 males and 5 females with a median age of 41 years (range, 18–49). Donors were HLA-A, B and high resolution DR fully matched siblings (n=8), matched unrelated donors (n=6), and 1-locus mismatched unrelated donors (n=1). The stem cells were collected from either peripheral blood (n=9) or bone marrow (n=6). The conditioning regimen included fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day (days -10 to -5), oral busulfan 4 mg/kg/day (n=4 patients), or intravenous busulfan 3.2 mg/kg/day (n=11 patients) (days -6 to -5) and anti-thymocyte globulin (Fresenius, Germany) (5mg/kg/day) (days -4 to-1). Mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin A and methotrexate was used for prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease(GVHD) after transplantation. Lipoprostagandin E1 was used in prophylactic regimen for hepatic veno-occlusive disease(VOD). To assess engraftment, degree of chimerism, minimal residual disease and relapse, all patients were monitored by cytogenetic analysis and donor vs host-specific DNA markers using short tandem repeats (STR) assay. The average cell number of MNC transfused was 4.83 (3.14~11.5)×108/kg; CD34+ cells were 3.47(2.38~6.24)×106/kg, CFU-GM was 2.15 (1.85~3.06) ×105/kg. Results: Engraftment of neutrophils and platelets was achieved in 14 out of 15 (93.3%) patients within a median of 13 days (range, 8–21) and 18 days (range, 10–35), respectively. Fourteen patients achieved complete donor chimerism in the peripheral blood before day +35 and one developed graft failure. No patients developed acute GVHD and VOD, but one died from interstitial pneumonia while she was in continuous complete remission 2 months following transplantation. With a median follow-up of 5 months (range 1.5 to 15), 13 of them were still in CCR. The overall non-relapse mortality in this group was 6.67% (1/15 patients). Overall survival, and disease-free survival rates were 93.3% and 86.7%, respectively. Conclusion: A fludarabine-based non-myeloablative conditioning regimen in allogeneic stem cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors is an effective and safe choice for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4975-4975
Author(s):  
Malek Benakli ◽  
Rose-Marie Hamladji ◽  
Redhouane Ahmed Nacer ◽  
Amina Talbi ◽  
Farih Mehdid ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation using a reduced intensity or nonmyeloablative conditioning (NSCT) represents an attractive treatment modality in CML. The rationale behind such approach is to decrease toxicity while inducing the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Because of its significantly lower cost in comparison to Imatinib mesylate, NSCT may be considered an early treatment option in countries where limited resources. Material and Methods: Between April 2001 and December 2006, we treated 154 CML patients (131 in first chronic phase, 23 in accelerated phase) with NSCT from an HLA-identical family donor. The majority of pts has a Gratwohl score <2 prior to NSCT (n=115; 74,6%). The conditioning regimen included Fludarabine 150 mg/m2 and oral Busulfan 8 mg /kg (139 pts). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of association ciclosporine (CSA)-Mycophenolate (MMF). 15 pts received an additional prophylaxis with antithymocyte globulin (ATG). Median age was 35 (range, 18–55) years, and the sex-ratio (M/F) 0,87. The median time from diagnosis to NSCT was 11 (range, 4–50) months. All pts received G-CSF mobilised peripheral blood stem cells, median CD34+ cells count: 7,02.106/kg (range, 1,28–44,9). Results: Leucopenia is found almost at 71 pts (46,1%). The median time to achieve ANC >500. 109/l granulocytes was 14 (range, 7–24) days, and median time of aplasia was 7 (range, 2–19) days. Transfusion requirements were significantly reduced, only 3 pts (1,9%) required red blood cells transfusions. Only 15 pts (9,7%) needed platelets transfusions. Acute GVHD was seen in 65 cases (43,6%) including 26 (17,4%) cases of grade III–IV and 32 cases (21%) of late onset acute GVHD occurring after day 100 post-NSCT. 93 pts (67,3%) had chronic GVHD, of whom 58 with an extensive form. 23 pts (15,4%) had CMV reactivation. 24 pts (16,1%) relapsed (15 in chronic phase, 7 in blast crisis and 2 with a molecular relapse), but 11 pts could be salvaged and are currently in remission (7 after immunosupression discontinuation, one after DLI and 3 after a second conventional allograft). The chimerism of donor origin (STR-PCR method) of patients in remission was at an average of 74% at day 30, 80% at d100, 93% at 6 months, 97% at 1 year, and 99% at 2 years. Fifty pts (33,5%) have died, of whom 39 (22,1%) from GVHD and 10 (6,7%) from disease relapse. Transplant Related Mortality (TRM) at 100 days was 6%, but rose to 31,5% at 3 years. At last follow-up (median, 32 (range 6–68) months), 99 pts (66,4%) are still alive, 97 (65,1%) pts in hematologic remission; of whom 76 (78,3%) in complete molecular remission evaluated by RT-PCR. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 5 years are 61% and 51,6% respectively. Conclusion. The study demonstrates a relatively low rate of short-term toxicities after NSCT. However, long-term TRM is still high because of the GVHD. The GVL effect is well admited. The relapse can be often controled by immunomodulation (stoppage of immunosuppression, DLI) and eventually by second myeloablative allograft.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3476-3476
Author(s):  
Franck-Emmanuel Nicolini ◽  
Valerie Coiteux ◽  
Gerard Socie ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
Eric Deconinck ◽  
...  

Abstract Background & aims The only curative treatment of CML to date, remains allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) despite some observations of non-detectable disease recurrence after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cessation. The scope of allogeneic stem cell transplant for chronic phase (CP-) CML remains debatable and it seems interesting to retrospectively analyse the settings of this procedure in such patients since the introduction of TKI within the therapeutic arsenal of this disease. Methods We retrospectively analysed the registry of the Francophone society of stem cell transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC) from 2002 to 2014, for patients being in CP at diagnosis and at transplant. All data were captured according to thefrench regulations and were collected after signed up informed consent for each patient. All patients were transplanted for different degrees of resistance or severe recurrent intolerance to TKI(s). We segmented the observation period into two parts: 2002-2006 (Imatinib era) and 2006-2014, once second generation TKI were available in our country (TKI2 era). All patients were in CP-CML at diagnosis and first chronic phase at transplant. Second transplants for the same patient were excluded from this analysis. Results From 2002 to 2014 the proportion of transplants for CML dramatically decreased form 7.1% to <3% of totalallo-SCT performed in the country. Nevertheless, between 2002 and 2014, 191 transplants were performed for CP-CML, 121 during the first period and 70 during the second period. Interestingly, age at transplant is 36 (26-43) for IM period and older, 44 (26-55) years for TKI2 period; with a sex ratio of 1.08 and 1.3 respectively (p=ns). The median interval between diagnosis and transplant was 19 (1.4-197) months for IM period and much longer thereafter[32 (6.6-194) months, p<0.001]. The source of cells varied a lot with 71% of BM, 25.5% PBSC and 3.5% CB for IM period, 37% BM, 56% PBSC and 7% CB for TKI2 period (p<0.001), whereas the proportion of MAC versus RIC remained stable (88.5%/11.5% versus 81%/19%, p=0.262). The use of TBI as a part of the conditioning regimen was drastically reduced during the second period: 37% IM era, 14% TKI2 era (p<001). While ABO match did not differ, the use of unrelated donors largely increased in the second period (66% versus 46%, p=0.015), with less identical sibling donors used (33% versus 52%) in this last period. The proportion of sex match did not differ with a majority of male to male transplants (28% and 37%; p=ns) performed in both groups. The majority of patients wereGratwohlscore 3 in IM period andGratwohlscore 4 in the second period. Overall, the cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD was 32%, 41.3% and 44% at 1,2 and 3 months respectively, and the overall cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 26%, 40%, 45%, 50% at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years. The TRM rates were not different between the 2 periods: 22.4%, 23%, 26.65% and 27.8% at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years for IM period and 16.2%, 19.7%, 22.4% and 27.8% at 1, 2, 5 years for TKI2 period (NR 10 year for this period, p=0.508).The overall (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates according to the two periods are shown in Figure 1, with only a trend in the improvement of OS and RFS in the TKI2 period (log-rank tests, p=0.601 and 0.651 respectively).Gratwohlscore efficiently segregated patients for OS (overall p value = 0.002) and RFS (p=0.007). Multivariate analysis adjusted on OS identified only age (HR=1.02, p=0.05), and a related donor as a favourable variable on outcome (HR=0.53, p=0.031) with no significant influence of age, interval diagnosis-allo-SCT, source of donor cells, and type of conditioning regimen. Conclusion Allo-SCT still remains a curative treatment of CP-CML despite significant toxicities over time and the picture of this procedure in the therapeutic arsenal has dramatically changed over the last decade due to multiple therapeutic options offered now. Despiteallo-SCT of patients with longer diseases histories, probably more co-morbidities, there is an encouraging trend in the improvement of OS and RFS. Figure 1 OS and RFS for CP-CML according to the engraftment period. Figure 1. OS and RFS for CP-CML according to the engraftment period. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Nicolini: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Coiteux:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Speakers Bureau. Michallet:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria. Peffault De Latour:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document