Impact of Antithymocyte Globulin-Containing Conditioning Regimens on Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Progressive Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Report From the SFGM-TC Group

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3035-3035
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha ◽  
Gandhi Damaj ◽  
Marie Robin ◽  
Stephane Vigouroux ◽  
Alice Garnier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3035 Background: due to a risk of relapse of underlying disease in patients transplanted with progressive malignancy, the use of antithymocyte globulins (ATG), incorporated within the conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), is still controversial. We report here on a study of 245 consecutive patients transplanted between January 1999 and December 2009 in 26 French and Belgian centers for progressive MDS, defined as stable, untreated, relapsed or refractory disease. Patients and Methods: Inclusion criteria included patients aged over 18 who received allo-SCT from either a sibling (n=153) or HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 allele matched unrelated donor (10/10) (n=86) for MDS or AML/RAEB-t (with 20–30% BM blasts). Data quality was ensured using computerized discrepancy errors and vigorous on-site data verification of every single file. A qualified research technicien has been appointed by the University-Hospital of Lille to assist on-site centers that couldn't meet data quality requirements. HLA matching was double-checked by the French Bone Marrow Donor Registry. Results: The first 239 files analyzed until now are presented, including 154 males and 85 females. According to the WHO classification at diagnosis, 85 patients had RA/RARS/RCMD, 86 RAEB1, 62 REAB2 and 6 RAEB-t/AML. Sixty-six patients had progressed to a more advanced disease before allo-SCT. At diagnosis, 102 patients had an IPSS int-2 or higher. Cytogenetic IPSS was recorded as favorable (n=109), intermediate (n=61), unfavorable (n=63) and missing (n=6). Disease status at transplant was established as follows: relapsed or refractory disease (n=106) and untreated or stable disease without hematological improvement (n=133). Median age at transplantation was 53 years (range, 20–70). Patients received myeloablative conditioning (n=105) and nonmyeloablative (n=134) including busulfan-based regimens (n=127), TBI-based regimens (n=92) or other alkylating-agent-based regimens (n=20). In this series, 95 patients (40%) received ATG as part of conditioning ('ATG' group), whereas 144 did not ('no-ATG' group). The analysis reference date of April 1st 2011, median follow-up in survivors was 50 months (IQR, 33–92) with 59 patients having died of relapse and 77 of TRM. The estimated 3-year OS and EFS was respectively 42.3%, and 32.4%. The probability of relapse, overall and event-free survival at 3 years was not significantly different between the two groups. In contrast, the cumulative incidence of grade 2–4 acute GVHD was 48% in the no-ATG group and 30% ATG group (P <.001) and the cumulative incidence of grade 3–4 acute GVHD was 24% and 11% respectively (P <.001). Although the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was similar in the no-ATG and ATG groups (64% vs 46%, p=.15), a trend for a lower TRM was observed in the ATG group (22% vs 31%, p=.06). In multivariate analysis, the absence of use of ATG was the strongest parameter associated with an increased risk of acute grade 2–4 [HR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.39–3.74, p=.001] and grade 3–4 GVHD [HR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.04–4.61, p=.035]. In conclusion, the addition of ATG to the conditioning regimen resulted in a decreased incidence of acute GVHD without increasing relapse rates and compromising patient survival undergoing allo-SCT for progressive MDS. Disclosures: Yakoub-Agha: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Fresinus: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria. Michallet:Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fresinus: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Deconinck:Celgene: Honoraria. Mohty:Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Prospective Analysis of Bortezomib, Fludarabine and Melphalan As Conditioning Regimen Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1020-1020
Author(s):  
Phyllis McKiernan ◽  
David S Siegel ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Tracy Andrews ◽  
Noa Biran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Despite advances in novel myeloma treatments and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), allogeneic HSCT (alloSCT) remains the only curative option for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). Questions remain as to the timing of alloSCT, toxicity risks and optimal conditioning regimen. The addition of bortezomib (Vel) to fludarabine (Flu) and melphalan (Mel) for conditioning prior to alloSCT is based on the demonstrated safety of Vel in combination with melphalan prior to ASCT, the synergistic effect of Vel with Mel, and the ability of Vel to selectively eliminate allo-reactive T-cells. Methods: We present a prospective Phase II study using Flu/Mel/Vel (FMV) as a conditioning regimen for alloSCT. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and transplant related mortality (TRM). For related donors, the conditioning regimen was Flu 30 mg/m2 days -5, -4, -3, -2, Vel 1.6 mg/m2 days -4, -1, Mel 140 mg/m2 day -2. For unrelated donors, rabbit ATG 4 mg/kg was given in divided doses days -3, -2, -1. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of methotrexate and tacrolimus. We compared pts receiving FMV to historical controls of pts receiving FM at the same dose and schedule without Vel. We also compared pts receiving FMV to all pts with MM treated with alloSCT including all regimens and donor types. The response criteria from the IMWG and M-Smart criteria were used to determine response and risk, respectively. Chi-square tests of association and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed to test for differences across groups. OS/PFS probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator with log rank-tests. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models examined factors associated with OS/PFS. Results: Of the 54 pts who received FMV, 35 (65%) were male and the median age was 56 years. Twenty-seven pts had an HLA matched sibling donor and 27 had an unrelated donor. At the time of alloSCT, 5 pts were in a CR, 27 in a VGPR, 13 in a PR, 9 had < PR. Twenty eight pts (52%) had high risk disease. Twenty-nine pts (53%) received alloSCT as salvage, defined as relapsed or refractory to ASCT, and 25 pts (46%) as consolidation after ASCT. OS was 42% at 10 years. While 32 pts developed aGVHD, only 2 had ≥ Grade 3. Of the 31 pts who developed cGVHD, 23 were graded as extensive. TRM was 5% at day 100, and 15% over 10 years. Pts in the control groups had similar baseline characteristics to the FMV group. The only significant difference was 47 pts (72%) who received FM were transplanted as salvage, and 18 (28%) as consolidation after ASCT (p=0.035). The total number of pts who did not receive FMV (non FMV) was 121, with 66 pts receiving FM. Compared to pts who received FMV, there was no difference in OS for pts who received FM or the non FMV group, 35% (p=0.55) and 48% (p=0.855) respectively. There was no difference in pts who developed aGVHD, however 9 pts (13%) had ≥ grade 3 aGVHD in the FM group (p=0.004) and 15 (12%) in the non FMV group (p=0.006). The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was similar with 51% for pts receiving FM and 60% for FMV pts (p=0.32). TRM was similar to pts who had received FMV; 18% for FM and 17% for non FMV. There were no differences between the 3 groups across disease risk, donor type, or disease status at the time of alloSCT. Multivariate analysis of the 3 groups, shows achieving a CR after alloSCT (p=0.0006) or having cGVHD (p=0.0004) predicts for improved OS, while severe aGVHD (p=0.0002) predicts for decreased OS. Discussion: While FMV was associated with a lower incidence of severe aGVHD, the addition of bortezomib to the FM backbone did not improve PFS or OS. Day 100 TRM was low for all regimens, and the addition of Vel did not impact overall TRM. For all 175 pts, those who achieve a CR after alloSCT had a significantly improved OS. This prompts the question of whether strategies should be employed post alloSCT to maximize response to a CR, and the role of achieving MRD negativity after alloSCT also needs to be elucidated. Figure Figure. Disclosures Siegel: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Biran:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Skarbnik:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals The Effect of JAK 1/2 Inhibitors on Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5784-5784
Author(s):  
Guido Lancman ◽  
Kathleen Miller ◽  
Shuli Li ◽  
Vincent T. Ho ◽  
Amir T. Fathi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Donor Type

Abstract Introduction: Ruxolitinib was the first JAK 1/2 inhibitor (JAKi) approved for myelofibrosis (MF), with several other JAKi in development. Ruxolitinib was approved on the basis of reducing splenomegaly and improving constitutional symptoms, but its effect on subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is not well understood. Retrospective studies to date have reported mixed outcomes after SCT for MF patients with previous exposure to JAKi. In this multicenter retrospective study, we report on outcomes of patients with MF treated with SCT at our institutions. Methods: We analyzed outcomes for 184 consecutive patients at three institutions who underwent SCT for primary or secondary MF. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS), all measured from the time of SCT. Cox proportional hazard regressions were fit to estimate the association between the use of JAK 1/2 inhibitors prior to SCT and OS, PFS, and GRFS, adjusting for donor type and DIPSS-plus status. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 72 patients received a JAKi prior to SCT, while 112 did not. Patients in these two groups were well-matched with respect to age, sex, DIPSS plus score, conditioning, and donor type (Table 1). Median follow-up was 31.2 months (range: 0.8-146.3 months). In univariate analysis, there was no difference in OS (JAKi: 4-yr OS 56.7% [95% CI 40.9-69.8%] vs. no JAKi: 43.6% [95% CI 32.9-53.9%], p=0.49), PFS (JAKi: 4 yr PFS 54.1% [95% CI 40.8-65.7%] vs. no JAKi: 43.9% [95% CI 33.4-53.9%], p=0.77), or GRFS (JAKi: 8-month GRFS 56.6% [95% CI 44.1-67.4%] vs. no JAKi: 50.4% [95% CI 40.4-59.5%], p=0.62) in the overall population; there was similarly no difference when comparing only intermediate-risk or only high-risk patients. In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in these outcomes for patients based on previous JAKi exposure when accounting for DIPSS plus score and donor type (related vs unrelated). Rates of acute GVHD were similar between the two groups (JAKi: 53.5% vs. no JAKi: 55.0%, p=0.88), including grade 3 or 4 acute GVHD (JAKi: 16.9% vs no JAKi: 19.8%, p=0.70). Conclusions: Our data suggest that there is no statistically significant difference in OS, PFS, GRFS, or rates of acute GVHD after SCT for MF patients based on previous JAKi treatment. This was true overall and after adjusting for DIPSS plus risk score or donor type. Given the retrospective design of our study, we were not able to assess prior response to JAKi or splenomegaly at SCT, which may influence outcomes. Given mixed results in the literature to date, we eagerly await the results of ongoing phase 2 trials of JAKi prior to SCT for MF. Disclosures Ho: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Fathi:Astellas: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Chen:Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy; REGiMMUNE: Consultancy. Hoffman:Formation Biologics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Merus: Research Funding; Summer Road: Research Funding. Mascarenhas:Novartis: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Cpss Cytogenetic Risk Classification in Patients with CMML after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2182-2182
Author(s):  
Christian Koenecke ◽  
Dirk-Jan Eikema ◽  
Sheree Hazelaar ◽  
Dietrich W. Beelen ◽  
Victoria Potter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Allogeneic Hsct

Abstract Introduction: The only curative treatment approach for patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but disease relapse after transplantation is a major concern. Predictors for disease outcome after HSCT are limited. However, unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities have been shown to serve as predictors for relapse after transplantation. The aim of this large multicentric, international study was to retrospectively determine the impact of cytogenetic information according to the CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) on outcome after allogeneic HSCT. Patients and Methods: Patients were selected from the EBMT database who had received a first allogeneic HSCT for the treatment of CMML between 2000 and 2015. 268 centers participated into this study. In total, 1503 patients were included. Impact of CPSS-cytogenetic classification was analyzed regarding overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality after HSCT (gray test). Results: 488 female (32.5%) and 1013 male (67.5%) patients were included to the study. Median age at HSCT was 57.6 years (range 0.3-75.4). At time of HSCT, only 422 (28.1%) patients were in complete remission, whereas 1004 (66.8%) had active disease (77 missing). Matched related donor HSCT was performed in 35.7% of the patients, matched unrelated donor HSCT in 57.6%, mismatched related in 3.3% and mismatched unrelated in 3.4%. Bone marrow (12.6%), peripheral blood (84.3%), or both (0.3%) served as the stem cell graft. Cord blood was used as a graft in 2.8%. Myeloablative preparative regimens wereused in 223 patients (15.0%), and less intensive regimens were given to 1268 patients (85.0%). Median survival of patients included into this study was 52.2 months. 637 patients had sufficient cytogenetic information according to CPSS (866 missing), complete relapse information was available in 1385 patients. 143 patients could be categorized into CPSS-high, 85 in intermediate and 375 in low risk cytogenetics, respectively. In univariate analysis high risk CPSS cytogenetic information was found to be strongly associated with OS (low 38% (32-44%), intermediate 41% (30-53%), high 26% (18-34%)), and higher cumulative incidence of relapse (low 40% (35-46%), intermediate 42% (30-54%), high 48% (39-56%)), but not with non relapse mortality (low 28% (23-33%), intermediate 25% (16-35%), high 30% (22-38%)) at 60 months (Figure 1). Conclusion: In this international, multicentric analysis we show that CMML patients with high-risk cytogenetics had significantly worse OS after HSCT than patients with intermediate or low risk cytogenetics according to CPSS. New therapeutic strategies to prevent relapse after HSCT in CMML patients with high-risk cytogenetics are needed. Disclosures Koenecke: Amgen: Consultancy; abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Beelen:Medac: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support. Finke:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Neovii: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Research Funding; Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau. Chalandon:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel costs. Ganser:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kobbe:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Letermovir Is Effective for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in HLA-Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2858-2858
Author(s):  
Takahide Ara ◽  
Yuta Hasegawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Ohigashi ◽  
Souichi Shiratori ◽  
Atsushi Yasumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cmv Disease ◽  
Cmv Reactivation

Abstract [Introduction] Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common viral infection in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Early CMV reactivation after allo-SCT is associated with worse non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS). Recently, T-cell replete HLA-haploidentical SCT using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haplo SCT) has been developed and spread rapidly worldwide. Rationale of this strategy is assumed to be selective and cytotoxic depletion of alloreactive T cells which are responsible for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), while preserving non-alloreactive T cells which can contribute to fight infections. However, recent studies showed that PTCy-haplo SCT was associated with the increased incidence of CMV infection. Letermovir (LET), a novel anti-CMV agent, which inhibits the CMV DNA terminase complex, was approved for the prevention of CMV reactivation in allo-SCT recipients in 2018 in some countries including Japan based on the result of a phase 3 trial. Our facility performs LET prophylaxis in allo-SCT recipient if either donor or recipient is seropositive CMV. Although LET is effective for the prevention of CMV reactivation in allo-SCT recipients, the clinical effectiveness of LET prophylaxis in PTCy-haplo SCT is not well elucidated. Based on these things, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of LET prophylaxis in PTCy-haplo SCT. [Methods] We retrospectively analyzed consecutive 99 recipients who received PTCy-haplo SCT at Hokkaido University Hospital from March 2013 to March 2021. We compared the cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation between the LET prophylaxis group (LET group, 33 patients) and LET non-prophylaxis group (non-LET group, 66 patients). LET was initiated on the day 0 at a dosage of 480mg daily. All patients were monitored for CMV reactivation by using the anti-CMV pp65 monoclonal antibody HRP-C7 assay at least once a week from the time of engraftment. CMV reactivation was defined as the detection of CMV antigen positive cells per 50000 white blood cells, whereas CMV disease was defined by organ dysfunction attributable to CMV. [Results] As baseline patient's characteristics were summarized in Table1, there were no difference between LET and non-LET group in terms of age, sex, underlying disease, disease risk at transplantation, prior transplantation, conditioning intensity, and CMV serostatus. All patients received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of Cy (40-50 mg/kg on day 3 and 4), tacrolimus (from day 5), and mycophenolate mofetil (from day 5). The cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation at 150 days after transplantation in LET group was significantly lower than that in non-LET group (30.3% versus 69.7%; P &lt;.001, Figure1A). Importantly, CMV disease were occurred in three patients without LET prophylaxis (gastritis, enteritis, and retinitis), but not in the patients with LET prophylaxis. The cumulative incidence of NRM at 1 year was similar between the patients with and without LET prophylaxis (17.6% versus 9.2%; P=0.366, Figure1B), as was OS at 1 year (71.5% versus 69.4%; P=0.801, Figure1C). Neutrophil engraftment was achieved in 32 patients (97%) at a median of 15 days in LET group and 64 patients (97%) at a median of 14.5 days in non-LET group (P=0.243). Furthermore, platelet engraftment was achieved in 26 patients (79%) at a median of 34 days in LET group and 57 patients (86%) at a median of 31 days in non-LET group (P=0.282). These findings suggest that LET does not affect engraftment. Interestingly, the length of hospitalization in the LET group was significantly shorter than that in non-LET group (the median, 59.5 days versus 71 days; P=0.0488), suggesting that LET suppresses CMV reactivation leading to early discharge. [Conclusion] To our best knowledge, this is the largest retrospective study about the efficacy of LET in PTCy-Haplo SCT. LET is effective for prevention of CMV reactivation in PTCy-haplo SCT. Further studies focused on the long term effect of LET prophylaxis in PTCy-haplo SCT, such as the incidence of relapse and chronic GVHD, is warranted. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nakagawa: AbbVie GK: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company: Research Funding. Teshima: Gentium/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Inc.: Honoraria; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Research Funding; Fuji pharma CO.,Ltd: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis International AG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; TEIJIN PHARMA Limited: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Other; Kyowa Kirin Co.,Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi S.A.: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Acute Leukemia Patients Receiving More Than 5/10 HLA-Mismatched Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Study on Behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3890-3890
Author(s):  
Michele Wieczorek ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Luca Castagna ◽  
Eolia Brissot ◽  
Gerard Socié ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is a powerful strategy to prevent occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Initially developed in the setting of haploidentical HSCT, PTCy has been increasingly used for fully HLA-matched transplants with favorable results. The purpose of this retrospective multi-center study is to evaluate PTCy-based GvHD prevention for patients with acute leukemia receiving a traditionally prohibitive highly mismatched HSCT and to describe their outcome. Methods This is a registry-based study employing the data set of the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). We retrospectively assessed the outcome of adult patients with acute myeloid or lymphoblastic leukemia (AML/ALL), transplanted between 2010 and 2020 with grafts from HLA-mismatched donors with more than 5/10 mismatches using PTCy-based GvHD prophylaxis. Results The study cohort consisted of 59 patients, with a median time of follow up of 20 (95% CI, 14-39) months. The median age was 47 (range, 18-69) years. Forty-four patients had a diagnosis of AML, 14 of ALL and one case of mixed phenotype acute leukemia. At time of transplant, 39 (66%) were in first or second complete remission, 4 (7%) were in later remission and 16 (27%) had active, relapsed or refractory, disease. Conditioning regimens were myeloablative for 54% of cases and peripheral blood was the preferred source of stem cells (64%). All donors were related. Most patients (85%) received a 4/10 HLA-matched transplant, the most commonly mismatched loci were C and DQB1, often with a double mismatch involving the same locus. Two cases of fully mismatched donors were also recorded. PTCy was always associated with other immunosuppressive treatments, especially with the standard combination of calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil. In only 8 cases in vivo T-cell depletion was realized with anti-thymocyte globulin. A large proportion of patients (86%) attained engraftment with a median time of 19 (range, 11-37) days. Only 8 patients did not reach engraftment and all of them died of infection or disease relapse in the first one-hundred days (range, 6-99) after HSCT. Thirty-three patients (58%) did not present any sign of acute GvHD (aGvHD). Cumulative incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV aGvHD at day 180 were 30.3% and 14.3%, respectively. At 2 years, the cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was 21%, and 7% for extensive cGvHD. Twenty-four patients died during the study period, mostly because of leukemia progression (n=13, 54%), infectious complications (n=6, 25%) and interstitial pneumonia (n=2, 8%). Other causes of death were hemorrhage, GvHD, and another non HSCT-related that accounted for one case (4%) each. At 2 years, the overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and a GVHD and relapse free survival (GRFS) were 56%, 54% and 47% respectively. Rates of relapse incidence and non-relapse mortality were 28% and 19%, respectively. Conclusion According to this preliminary data overview, transplantation in a highly mismatched framework is possible, without unfavorable OS, LFS and GVHD rates. Despite the important limitation of the retrospective non-controlled nature of this analysis, these findings suggest that PTCy-based strategies could help overcome the barrier of HLA-matching and configure a new setting of transplantation, encouraging more in-depth investigations. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Labopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Angelucci: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene BSM: Honoraria, Other: DMC; Blue Bird Bio: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Menarini-Stemline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: steering commitee, Speakers Bureau; Vertex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: DMC; Crispr therapeutics: Honoraria, Other: DMC; Glaxo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yakoub-Agha: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Mohty: Takeda: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Conditioning Regimen Intensity May Affect Outcome in MDS Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, Depending on MDS Subgroup

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5743-5743
Author(s):  
Barry S. Skikne ◽  
Anurag K. Singh ◽  
Sunil Abhyankar ◽  
Tara L. Lin ◽  
Leyla Shune ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Who Classification ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is a potentially curative treatment for MDS. Besides the innate heterogeneity of MDS, intensity of the conditioning regimen (myeloablative (MAC) versus reduced intensity/non-myeloablative (RIC)), specific agents used in conditioning, donor and source of stem cells and GVHD prevention regimens further influence outcomes. We sought to determine how conditioning regimens influenced MDS subgroup cohort outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 107 MDS patients (63 male and 44 females) with median age 61.8 (17-73 years) who underwent allogeneic SCT at our institution between 2008 and 2017. For the purposes of this report, patients were grouped according to WHO classification into non-RAEB (RCMD, RA, RARS RCUD or 5q deletion, n=49) and RAEB (RAEB1 and RAEB2, n=58) categories. Median time from MDS diagnosis to transplantation was 139 days (20-3175). No patients were in complete remission (CR) at time of SCT. Allogeneic donor types were matched related, matched unrelated, haplo-identical and cord blood in 30, 65, 10 and 2 patients, respectively. Stem cell source was peripheral blood (91 patients) and bone marrow in 14. Forty patients (median age 52.2 (17-61) years) underwent MAC and 67 (median age 63.7 (23-73) years) RIC. Twelve patients died within 100 days of transplantation, 3 due to disease progression, 5 to acute GVHD, and 4 to other transplant-related causes. Median overall survival (OS) for all 107 patients was 1.3 years with 54%, 47% and 40% alive at 1, 2 and at 5 years. OS was slightly higher in patients undergoing RIC with OS of 57%, 48% and 40% (median 1.532 years) versus 50%, 40% and 38% with MAC (median 0.92 years) at the same time points (p>0.1). Median OS of the 49 patients with non-RAEB and 58 patients with RAEB MDS was 3.01 years versus 0.92 years (p>0.1). GVHD was the most frequent cause of death (46%), followed by relapse/progression (28%), infection (14%) and other (12%). Of 29 patients undergoing RIC with non-RAEB MDS, median OS was 3.78 years while for 38 RAEB patients it was 1.17 years (p>0.1). See table for OS according to conditioning regimen and WHO classification. For MAC, in 20 non-RAEB patients median OS was 2.2 years while the median OS was 0.69 years for 20 RAEB patients (p>0.1). CR after SCT was achieved in 57 patients (53%), 33 receiving RIC (CR 49.2%) and 24 receiving MAC (CR 60%). Seven patients subsequently relapsed, 4 RIC and 3 MAC. Of the non-RAEB patients achieving CR, median OS in the 16 patients treated with 111 RIC was not reached and in 14 patients receiving MAC, median OS was 3.75 years (p>0.1). For the 27 RAEB patients achieving CR, median OS was 4.4 years in 17 patients treated with RIC versus not reached in 10 patients treated with MAC. Overall, death in non-RAEB patients occurred in 26/49 (53%) compared to 38/58 (66%) RAEB patients and in 40/67 (59%) patients undergoing RIC versus 25/40 (63%) MAC patients (p>0.5). The hematopoietic transplant comorbidity index did not predict OS outcomes in these MDS patients (p>0.1) and the cytogenetic score according to the IPSS-R "very good -very poor" groups indicated no differences in OS in the non-RAEB patients but in RAEB patients significant differences according to the cytogenetic score was evident (P<0.01). Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of MDS patients undergoing allogeneic SCT, achieving CR led to improved survival. In non-RAEB MDS patients achieving CR, OS was similar irrespective of conditioning intensity (RIC or MAC). Furthermore, outcomes did not differ in RAEB patients who achieved CR according to intensity of conditioning regimen. However, those receiving MAC had not reached median OS at 5 years. The outcomes in this analysis indicate that improvement in the incidence of deaths due to GVHD would likely have the greatest impact in improving survival in MDS patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation. Table Disclosures Abhyankar: Therakos: Other: Consulting, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Lin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yacoub:Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Ganguly:Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding. McGuirk:Pluristem Ltd: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ArticulateScience LLC: Other: Assistance with manuscript preparation.

Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Temsirolimus and Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Lymphomas

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 43-44
Author(s):  
Ajay Major ◽  
Justin Kline ◽  
Theodore G. Karrison ◽  
Paul A S Fishkin ◽  
Amy S Kimball ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
The Other ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Background Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis in relapsed lymphomas is of interest based on constitutive activation in many lymphoma subtypes, and has had varying degrees of success. We previously showed that the first generation mTOR inhibitor, temsirolimus (TEM), has activity across histologies with an acceptable toxicity profile (Smith, et al., JCO 2010). Lenalidomide (LEN) is currently approved for use in indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and has several potential synergistic and overlapping targets with PI3K/mTOR/Akt inhibition. We designed this phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of TEM and LEN in relapsed/refractory lymphomas. Methods The phase I dose-finding study utilized a standard "3+3" design and was open to all patients with mature B-cell malignancies. TEM was 25 mg IV weekly for all dose levels. LEN was dosed orally on D1-D21 every 28 days at three dose levels: 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg. The phase II study accrued patients in a two-stage "minimax" design with stratification into three histologically-defined cohorts: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and other lymphomas. Primary endpoints of the phase II study were rates of complete (CR) and overall response (ORR), and secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results In the phase I study, 18 patients were enrolled and available for toxicity assessment. Patients were treated to intolerance, progression, or discontinuation at physician discretion. Of these, 15 patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment. At dose level 3, there were 2 DLTs: grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 HSV mucositis. Dose level 2 was thus established as the recommended phase II dose: TEM 25 mg weekly and LEN 20 mg on D1-D21 every 28 days. Of the 18 patients, there were 5 partial responses, 4 stable disease, 3 progressive disease, 4 on active treatment, and 2 not adequately assessed. The phase II study enrolled an additional 93 patients (Table 1): 39 DLBCL, 15 FL, and 39 other lymphomas which included 20 relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. The median number of prior treatments was 4 (range, 1-14), and 31 patients (33%) had relapsed following prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The median number of cycles delivered was 4 (range, 1-21). The FL cohort closed prematurely due to slow accrual. The ORR were 25.6% (12.8% CR) and 64.1% (17.9% CR) for DLBCL and other lymphoma cohorts, respectively (Table 2). The ORR for HL patients in the other lymphoma cohort, the majority of whom had relapsed after brentuximab vedotin (BV) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), was 80% (35% CR). Eight HL patients (40%) proceeded to allogeneic transplantation after TEM and LEN therapy. The high response rate in the other lymphoma cohort was sufficient to reject the null hypothesis of a 30% response rate under the minimax design. Median PFS was 7.0 mo (90% CI 3.5-8.0) and 7.0 mo (90% CI 4.6-9.9) for DLBCL and other lymphoma cohorts, respectively (Table 2). Median OS was 9.1 mo (90% CI 6.0-16.0) and 25.5 mo (90% CI 10.8-60.6) for DLBCL and other lymphoma cohorts, respectively (Table 2). Median DOR was 13.8 mo (90% CI 4.1-19.0) and 5.5 mo (90% CI 2.6-23.7) for DLBCL and other lymphoma cohorts, respectively (Table 2). Median PFS, OS and DOR for HL patients in the other lymphoma cohort were 9.2 mo (90% CI 4.6-25.5), 39.6 mo (90% CI 17.4-NR), and 8.1 mo (90% CI 5.1-38.3), respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves are displayed in Figure 1. Grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse events (AE) related to treatment were uncommon, with no cases of pneumonitis and one grade 3 thromboembolism. Grade ≥3 hematologic AEs were common and reversible. Three Grade 5 AEs occurred (colonic perforation, myocardial infarction and sepsis). Conclusions Combination therapy with TEM and LEN demonstrated encouraging activity in heavily-pretreated and relapsed/refractory lymphomas. Survival in the other lymphoma cohort was primarily driven by favorable activity in relapsed/refractory HL. TEM and LEN may be a suitable option for treatment of HL after BV and ASCT, including as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Further study of PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibition in combination with lenalidomide is warranted, particularly in relapsed HL. Disclosures Kline: Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Kimball:Amgen: Current Employment; Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Petrich:Daiichi-Sankyo: Current Employment; AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; FortySeven: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Temsirolimus is FDA-approved for renal cell carcinoma.

The Use of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Is Associated with Increased Chance of Survival Free from Relapse and Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Adults with Philadelphia-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: An Analysis By the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 666-666
Author(s):  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Wlodzimierz Mendrek ◽  
Gerard Socie ◽  
Liisa Volin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is considered a standard of care for adults with high risk Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-neg ALL). During the last decade mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCT) has become predominant source of graft for allo-SCT. However, as compared to bone marrow, PBSCT is associated with increased risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Attempts to reduce the cGVHD rate include the addition of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) to the conditioning regimen. The goal of this registry-based, retrospective study was to analyze the effect of ATG on results of allo-PBSCT in adults with Ph-neg ALL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 682 patients, aged 18-74 years, with Ph-neg ALL, treated with un-manipulated allo-PBSCT in first complete remission between 1997-2014 were included in the analysis. Conditioning regimen was myeloablative in 550 (81%) cases. Among 339 transplantations from matched sibling donors, ATG was used in 57 (22%) cases. In the 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated setting 204/343 (78%) patients were treated with ATG. Survival free from grade III-IV acute GVHD, cGVHD and relapse (GRFS) was the primary study end-point. RESULTS: In a univariate analysis the use of ATG was associated with increased probability of GRFS at 3 years (46% vs 38%, p=0.02) as well as decreased incidence of the overall cGVHD (34% vs. 51%, p=0.0001) and extensive cGVHD (12% vs. 25%, p<0.0001). No significant difference could be demonstrated with regard to the incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (30% vs. 33%, p=0.41), grade III-IV acute GVHD (8% vs. 11%, p=0.12), relapse (28% vs. 26%, p=0.38) and non-relapse mortality (NRM, 15% vs. 17%, p=0.21) as well as probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS, 57% vs. 57%, p=0.89) and overall survival (OS, 65% vs. 65%, p=0.54). In a multivariate model adjusted for other potential risk factors, the use of ATG was associated with reduced risk of grade II-IV aGVHD (HR=0.64, p=0.007), grade III-IV aGVHD (HR=0.52, p=0.03), overall cGVHD (HR=0.61, p=0.001), extensive cGVHD (HR=0.4, p<0.0001), and NRM (HR=0.62, p=0.04). No significant effect was found with regard to the incidence of relapse (p=0.27), LFS (p=0.7) and OS (p=0.16). GRFS was significantly increased with the use of ATG (HR=0.74; p=0.009). Among other factors a chance of GRFS was significantly decreased with increasing patient age (HR=1.1 for each 10 years, p=0.02), transplantations with reduced-intensity conditioning (HR=1.61, p=0.0009) and positive recipient CMV serological status (HR=1.3, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Ph-neg ALL treated with allo-PBSCT benefit from the use ATG in terms of survival free from GVHD and relapse. The use of ATG should therefore be recommended in this setting. Further studies are needed to explore potential role of the ATG brand and dose. Disclosures Masszi: Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maertens:Merck Sharp & Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in First Chronic Phase CML during the Last Decade: Retrospective Analysis of the National SFGM-TC Registry

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3476-3476
Author(s):  
Franck-Emmanuel Nicolini ◽  
Valerie Coiteux ◽  
Gerard Socie ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
Eric Deconinck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Second Period

Abstract Background & aims The only curative treatment of CML to date, remains allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) despite some observations of non-detectable disease recurrence after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cessation. The scope of allogeneic stem cell transplant for chronic phase (CP-) CML remains debatable and it seems interesting to retrospectively analyse the settings of this procedure in such patients since the introduction of TKI within the therapeutic arsenal of this disease. Methods We retrospectively analysed the registry of the Francophone society of stem cell transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC) from 2002 to 2014, for patients being in CP at diagnosis and at transplant. All data were captured according to thefrench regulations and were collected after signed up informed consent for each patient. All patients were transplanted for different degrees of resistance or severe recurrent intolerance to TKI(s). We segmented the observation period into two parts: 2002-2006 (Imatinib era) and 2006-2014, once second generation TKI were available in our country (TKI2 era). All patients were in CP-CML at diagnosis and first chronic phase at transplant. Second transplants for the same patient were excluded from this analysis. Results From 2002 to 2014 the proportion of transplants for CML dramatically decreased form 7.1% to <3% of totalallo-SCT performed in the country. Nevertheless, between 2002 and 2014, 191 transplants were performed for CP-CML, 121 during the first period and 70 during the second period. Interestingly, age at transplant is 36 (26-43) for IM period and older, 44 (26-55) years for TKI2 period; with a sex ratio of 1.08 and 1.3 respectively (p=ns). The median interval between diagnosis and transplant was 19 (1.4-197) months for IM period and much longer thereafter[32 (6.6-194) months, p<0.001]. The source of cells varied a lot with 71% of BM, 25.5% PBSC and 3.5% CB for IM period, 37% BM, 56% PBSC and 7% CB for TKI2 period (p<0.001), whereas the proportion of MAC versus RIC remained stable (88.5%/11.5% versus 81%/19%, p=0.262). The use of TBI as a part of the conditioning regimen was drastically reduced during the second period: 37% IM era, 14% TKI2 era (p<001). While ABO match did not differ, the use of unrelated donors largely increased in the second period (66% versus 46%, p=0.015), with less identical sibling donors used (33% versus 52%) in this last period. The proportion of sex match did not differ with a majority of male to male transplants (28% and 37%; p=ns) performed in both groups. The majority of patients wereGratwohlscore 3 in IM period andGratwohlscore 4 in the second period. Overall, the cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD was 32%, 41.3% and 44% at 1,2 and 3 months respectively, and the overall cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 26%, 40%, 45%, 50% at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years. The TRM rates were not different between the 2 periods: 22.4%, 23%, 26.65% and 27.8% at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years for IM period and 16.2%, 19.7%, 22.4% and 27.8% at 1, 2, 5 years for TKI2 period (NR 10 year for this period, p=0.508).The overall (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates according to the two periods are shown in Figure 1, with only a trend in the improvement of OS and RFS in the TKI2 period (log-rank tests, p=0.601 and 0.651 respectively).Gratwohlscore efficiently segregated patients for OS (overall p value = 0.002) and RFS (p=0.007). Multivariate analysis adjusted on OS identified only age (HR=1.02, p=0.05), and a related donor as a favourable variable on outcome (HR=0.53, p=0.031) with no significant influence of age, interval diagnosis-allo-SCT, source of donor cells, and type of conditioning regimen. Conclusion Allo-SCT still remains a curative treatment of CP-CML despite significant toxicities over time and the picture of this procedure in the therapeutic arsenal has dramatically changed over the last decade due to multiple therapeutic options offered now. Despiteallo-SCT of patients with longer diseases histories, probably more co-morbidities, there is an encouraging trend in the improvement of OS and RFS. Figure 1 OS and RFS for CP-CML according to the engraftment period. Figure 1. OS and RFS for CP-CML according to the engraftment period. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Nicolini: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Coiteux:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Speakers Bureau. Michallet:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria. Peffault De Latour:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Improvement in Non-Relapse Mortality Following Allogeneic Transplantation for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia in Australia and New Zealand: An Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 25-26
Author(s):  
Luani Barge ◽  
Steven Tran ◽  
Glen A Kennedy ◽  
David Ritchie ◽  
David Gottlieb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Past

Background The treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has significantly changed over the past decade with the advent of targeted therapies. Subsequent improvement in remission rates has been seen in all patient groups, however patients with high-risk genetic features (del17p, TP53 mutation) continue to have poorer outcomes. In such patients, and in multiply relapsed/refractory standard risk patients, allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains a viable management option despite the associated morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to examine trends in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for CLL in Australia and New Zealand over the past decade, and to identify predictive factors for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Methods Data was collected through the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR) for patients receiving a first allogeneic stem cell transplantation for CLL, in the absence of Richter's transformation, between January 2009 and December 2018. Transplant outcomes were compared between 2 time periods, 2009-2013 and 2014-2018 using log rank test for survival and Gray's test for cumulative incidence curves. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of survival. Medians are reported with ranges, hazard ratios (HR) and cumulative incidence with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 153 patients (75% males) were included. Median age at transplantation was 55 years (range 23-69) with a median time from diagnosis to transplantation of 5.7 years (range 100days - 24.7years). Most patients received reduced intensity or non-myeloablative conditioning (84.3%, n=129) and did not receive T cell depleting therapy (73%, n=94). The median follow up was 5.9 years (range 0.8-11years). Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 16 days (range 6-49) and median time to platelet engraftment was 18 days (range 1-69). At 100 days following transplantation the cumulative incidence of graft failure was 3.9%, CMV reactivation 41% (95% CI 31-50%) and CMV disease 3.2% (95% CI 1-8%). Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) grade II-IV occurred in 39% (95% CI 29-49%) of patients and grade III-IV in 17% (95% CI 9-25%). The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 65% (95% CI 53-76%) at 5 years; extensive cGVHD occurred in 77% of patients with cGVHD. Median OS was 4.3 years (95% CI 3.6-not reached) and PFS was 2.6 years (95% CI 1.7-3.9). The most common contributors to mortality were infection (43%), GVHD (40%) and persistent disease or relapse (24%). In a multivariate analysis active disease at time of transplantation was associated with a worse OS (HR 2.16, 1.01-4.63), however, age, matched sibling donor, myeloablative conditioning and the use of T cell depleting therapies did not have a significant impact. The use of myeloablative conditioning was associated with improved PFS (HR 1.85, 1.1-3.1) in a univariate analysis but lost significance in multivariate analysis. Ninety-seven patients underwent transplantation between 2009-2013 and 56 patients between 2014-2018. There was no statistical difference in patient age, performance status, donor or disease status at transplantation between the groups. Myeloablative conditioning was used in 18.6% and 8.9% (p=0.197), and T cell depleting therapy in 25% and 31% (p=0.58), for the 2009-2013 and 2014-2018 periods respectively. There was a significant improvement in 5-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) from 41.5% (31-52%) to 23.4% (13-29%; p=0.04). Five year OS (46% vs 56%), PFS (36% vs 46%) and relapse rates (21% vs 31%) were not statistically different. Cumulative incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD was reduced in the later cohort; aGVHD 51% (95% CI 34-65%) vs 29% (95% CI 16-43%; p=0.03), cGVHD 76% (95% CI 57-88%) vs 53% (36-66%; p=0.02). Kaplan-meier and cumulative incidence curves for these outcomes are presented in figure 1. Conclusion The number of allogeneic stem cell transplantations performed for CLL has reduced over the past decade in Australasia. There has been an improvement in NRM and incidence of GVHD, however OS and PFS have not significantly changed. This may reflect improved GVHD prophylaxis and management, or advances in supportive care. Further analysis of impact of high-risk genetic factors at transplantation is pending at the time of abstract submission. Figure Disclosures Spencer: Celgene, Janssen and Takeda: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Servier and Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Honoraria. Greenwood:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Tam:AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Di Ciaccio:Jansen: Honoraria, Other: travel and accomodation grant. Hamad:Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document