A Systematic Review on the Use of Intrathecal Rituximab in CNS Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4987-4987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahraaz Wyne ◽  
Leslie Skeith ◽  
Joy E. Mangel ◽  
Anargyros Xenocostas ◽  
Alejandro Lazo-Langner

Abstract Abstract 4987 Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) involvement by non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a rare but serious complication with a high mortality rate and few effective therapeutic options. Rituximab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that is administered systemically in combination with chemotherapy, but can also be given intrathecally. When administered intrathecally (IT), rituximab achieves more predictable and higher cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations compared to its intravenous administration, however the efficacy and safety of IT rituximab are unknown (Rubenstein et al., J Clin Oncol 2007). We recently treated a 52 year old woman for a CNS relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) using a combination of IT rituximab, cytarabine, methotrexate and hydrocortisone, as well as craniospinal radiation. After initial improvement, she developed subacute combined degeneration (SCD) of the spinal cord. This prompted the present systematic review of the literature in order to explore the efficacy and safety of administering rituximab directly into the CSF for the treatment of CNS involvement by NHL. Methods: We identified all relevant citations in MEDLINE/EMBASE/CINAHL/BIOSIS Previews from their date of inception to June 20th, 2011. Prospective studies, case reports and case series reporting on intrathecal or intraventricular (via ommaya-reservoir) use of rituximab in relapsed primary (PCNSL) or secondary CNS-lymphoma were included. All articles citing the included articles, as well as the reference lists of included articles were reviewed to ensure capture of all relevant studies. In some cases, authors were contacted to gather additional information. Two authors independently evaluated study eligibility. Disagreements were resolved by consensus and agreement was assessed using the kappa statistic. All non-human studies were excluded. Due to the nature of the studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. Results: The search strategy identified 148 potential reports published between 2002–2011 of which 22 were included (3 prospective trials, 2 phase-I trials, 2 case-series and 15 case reports). The kappa value for inter-author agreement was 0.881. A total of 74 patients, aged 4–84 years old (Mean age 48), with PCNSL (28%) or secondary CNS-Lymphoma (ALL 14%, DLBCL 8%, Burkitt's 4%, Mantle Cell Lymphoma 5%, Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder 4%, Unknown histology 37%), received 1 to 22 doses of 10–50mg of intrathecal (43%) or intraventricular (IVT) rituximab, either alone or in combination with other therapies. At a mean follow-up of 43 weeks (Range 2–178), 34% of patients were in complete remission and 28% showed a partial response. Patients having both leptomeningeal and parenchymal involvement of CNS lymphoma were the most likely to have progression of disease with IT/IVT rituximab (44%), as compared to those with isolated disease in the leptomeninges (29%) or parenchyma (33%). Fifty percent of patients with isolated disease in the leptomeningeal compartment showed complete remission with IVT/IT rituximab therapy. Fatigue, nausea/vomiting and paresthesias were the most commonly reported side effects. In one series, seven patients developed arachnoiditis. There was a single case of Hepatitis B virus reactivation in a patient with parenchymal PCNSL. In addition, our patient developed symptoms and findings consistent with SCD and in whom a relation between SCD and rituximab could not be ruled out. Conclusion: In case series and reports, IT rituximab appears to be a safe and modestly effective therapy when used in conjunction with other salvage therapies for the management of refractory CNS-lymphoma. The overall proportion of complications appears to be reasonably low. To our knowledge, our patient is the first case of SCD reported in a patient who received IT rituximab. Further studies with a particular emphasis on safety are needed before widespread use can be recommended. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Systematic literature review on the use of intrathecal rituximab for CNS lymphoma (off-label use). Lazo-Langner:Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Pfizer Inc.: Honoraria.

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad Hammadi ◽  
Ali Hashim ◽  
Abbas Ali ◽  
Rafid Abbood ◽  
Hassanein Ali ◽  
...  

Background: The idea of convalescent plasma usage is to give passive immunity to the patients, so their immune system stands a good chance of combating the virus.this study will review 6 cases of eligible covid 19 patients that had been treated with convalescent plasma therapy in Basra covid 19 quarantine Objectives: to demonstrate efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma in the patient series that had been enrolled . Method: this study had pioneered a new method to collect up to 3,000 mL in one session by an off-label use of Spectra Optia Apheresis systems by TerumoBCT /Exchange set to collect convalescent plasma. In this study 250 mL convalescent plasma had been given each of the 6 patients, from one donor. respose in spo2,dyspnoea and tachypnoea was observed ,any reaction to plasma also had been monitored . Result: Our case series have demonstrated both safety and effectiveness of convalescent plasma. This study was successful in reaching our primary and secondary outcomes in all 6 patients (improvement in SpO2 and symptoms). With negligible difference in time of post transfusion response Conclusion: convalescent plasma is apperantly safe and effective, In this study 250 mL convalescent plasma had been given each of the 6 patients, from one donor using Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) protocol by Spectra Optia Apheresis system/TerumoBCT. Keywords: convalescent plasma, COVID-19, SARS CoV-2, apheresis, plasma exchange, plasma donation


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 415-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Solmi ◽  
Nicola Veronese ◽  
Nita Thapa ◽  
Silvia Facchini ◽  
Brendon Stubbs ◽  
...  

ObjectiveOur aim was to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of adjunctive minocycline as a treatment of schizophrenia.MethodsWe conducted a PubMed/Scopus database search from inception to 3 February 2016 for randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs), open non-randomized studies, and case reports/series evaluating minocycline in patients with schizophrenia. Random-effects meta-analysis of positive, negative, depressive, and cognitive symptom rating scales, discontinuation and adverse effects rates calculating standardized mean difference (SMD), and risk ratios±95% confidence intervals (CI95%) were calculated.ResultsSix RCTs were eligible (minocyclinen=215, placebon=198) that demonstrated minocycline’s superiority versus placebo for reducing endpoint Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores (SMD=–0.59;CI95%=[1.15, –0.03];p=0.04), negative (SMD=–0.76;CI95%=[–1.21, –0.31];p=0.001); general subscale scores (SMD=–0.44;CI95%=[–0.88, –0.00];p=0.05), Clinical Global Impressions scores (SMD=–0.50;CI95%=[–0.78, –0.22];p<0.001); and executive functioning (SMD=0.22;CI95%=[0.01, 0.44];p=0.04). Endpoint PANSS positive symptom scores (p=0.13), depression rating scale scores (p=0.43), attention (p=0.47), memory (p=0.52), and motor speed processing (p=0.50) did not significantly differ from placebo, before execution of a trim-and-fill procedure. Minocycline did not differ compared to placebo on all-cause discontinuation (p=0.56), discontinuation due to inefficacy (p=0.99), and intolerability (p=0.51), and due to death (p=0.32). Data from one open-label study (N=22) and three case series (N=6) were consistent with the metaanalytic results.ConclusionsMinocycline appears to be an effective adjunctive treatment option in schizophrenia, improving multiple relevant disease dimensions. Moreover, minocycline has an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. However, more methodologically sound and larger RCTs remain necessary to confirm and extend these results.


2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.M. Jones ◽  
C. Thompson ◽  
I. Bitter

AbstractSecond generation antipsychotic agents are increasingly used in the management of acute mania. A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of these agents, as both monotherapy and in combination with mood stabilisers, was performed to establish the evidence for their use. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were critically appraised in more detail than studies that presented lower levels of evidence such as case reports, case series and open label follow up studies. We found 11 RCTs reporting on patients treated with second generation antipsychotics for acute bipolar mania, of which three included randomisation between the second generation antipsychotic and placebo, and eight between a mood stabiliser combined with either the second generation antipsychotic or placebo. Data from non-randomised trials is also presented.


2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
DL Fink ◽  
L Hedley ◽  
RF Miller

Biologic therapies are injectable immunomodulatory agents directed against specific immune cell or chemical targets. They have transformed the lives of HIV-uninfected individuals with severe inflammatory conditions including psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ulcerative colitis. The perceived increased infection risk associated with these agents means that HIV-infected individuals have not been included in randomised control trials of these drugs. The literature for use of biologic therapies in HIV-infected populations is limited to case reports and case series. There are additional data on use of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against B lymphocytes, in the setting of HIV-associated haematological malignancy. We performed a systematic review of efficacy and safety of biologic therapy for inflammatory conditions in HIV-infected individuals. Our systematic review identified 37 treatment episodes with six different biologic agents encompassing 10 different inflammatory conditions. Broadly, efficacy of the agents studied was comparable to reports from HIV-uninfected patients. Both infectious and non-infectious sequelae were also comparable with trial data from HIV-uninfected patients. HIV control, even for the minority of individuals not receiving anti-retroviral therapy (ART) at the time of biologic therapy, was not adversely affected. However, detail was limited concerning ART regimens and both immunological and virological parameters of follow-up. Overall available literature is of very low quality and likely subject to publication bias of successful cases. Firm conclusions are not possible regarding the efficacy and safety of biologic agents in HIV-infected individuals; however, there appear to be sufficient data to warrant inclusion of individuals with well-controlled HIV in future trial studies.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1780-1780
Author(s):  
Ian A. Greer ◽  
Catherine Nelson-Piercy

Abstract Introduction Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has become the standard therapy for managing acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy. In the UK, Europe and Australasia, LMWH is widely used for the treatment of both deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism occurring during pregnancy, and this practice is endorsed by a peer-reviewed Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guideline. However, there are currently no LMWHs licensed for use during pregnancy, and efficacy and safety data are derived mostly from small case series. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LMWH for VTE treatment during pregnancy by performing a systematic review of data from published literature. Methods Data from published studies included in this systematic review were identified by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE up to the end of 2003. The reference lists from identified articles were also hand searched. Data on the LMWH treatment regime, VTE recurrence, and side effects of VTE treatment were extracted and entered into pre-piloted forms. Results Sixteen studies (including six case reports) reporting 177 patients were included. One hundred and eight (61%) women were treated with enoxaparin, 49 (28%) with dalteparin and 20 (11%) with nadroparin. In 31 (18%) cases, VTE was initially treated with unfractionated heparin for two days to two weeks after diagnosis. LMWH was administered twice daily in 154 (87%) cases. Recurrent VTE was reported in three (1.7%) women: one receiving dalteparin 10,000 IU od, one receiving enoxaparin 40 mg bd, and one receiving enoxaparin 1mg/kg bd. There were no maternal deaths. Severe maternal bleeding occurred in three (1.7%) women. In two cases, the LMWH could have contributed to the extent of bleeding originating primarily from obstetric causes, and in the other from epistaxis. Minor allergic reactions occurred in two (1.1%) women, thrombocytopenia (unrelated to LMWH) in one (0.6%) woman, and osteoporosis in none. Conclusion Our findings are consistent with LMWH being both effective and safe in the treatment of acute VTE during pregnancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document