The novel use of convalescent plasma in patients with COVID 19 in Basra governorate, Case series review

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad Hammadi ◽  
Ali Hashim ◽  
Abbas Ali ◽  
Rafid Abbood ◽  
Hassanein Ali ◽  
...  

Background: The idea of convalescent plasma usage is to give passive immunity to the patients, so their immune system stands a good chance of combating the virus.this study will review 6 cases of eligible covid 19 patients that had been treated with convalescent plasma therapy in Basra covid 19 quarantine Objectives: to demonstrate efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma in the patient series that had been enrolled . Method: this study had pioneered a new method to collect up to 3,000 mL in one session by an off-label use of Spectra Optia Apheresis systems by TerumoBCT /Exchange set to collect convalescent plasma. In this study 250 mL convalescent plasma had been given each of the 6 patients, from one donor. respose in spo2,dyspnoea and tachypnoea was observed ,any reaction to plasma also had been monitored . Result: Our case series have demonstrated both safety and effectiveness of convalescent plasma. This study was successful in reaching our primary and secondary outcomes in all 6 patients (improvement in SpO2 and symptoms). With negligible difference in time of post transfusion response Conclusion: convalescent plasma is apperantly safe and effective, In this study 250 mL convalescent plasma had been given each of the 6 patients, from one donor using Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) protocol by Spectra Optia Apheresis system/TerumoBCT. Keywords: convalescent plasma, COVID-19, SARS CoV-2, apheresis, plasma exchange, plasma donation

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4987-4987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahraaz Wyne ◽  
Leslie Skeith ◽  
Joy E. Mangel ◽  
Anargyros Xenocostas ◽  
Alejandro Lazo-Langner

Abstract Abstract 4987 Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) involvement by non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a rare but serious complication with a high mortality rate and few effective therapeutic options. Rituximab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that is administered systemically in combination with chemotherapy, but can also be given intrathecally. When administered intrathecally (IT), rituximab achieves more predictable and higher cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations compared to its intravenous administration, however the efficacy and safety of IT rituximab are unknown (Rubenstein et al., J Clin Oncol 2007). We recently treated a 52 year old woman for a CNS relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) using a combination of IT rituximab, cytarabine, methotrexate and hydrocortisone, as well as craniospinal radiation. After initial improvement, she developed subacute combined degeneration (SCD) of the spinal cord. This prompted the present systematic review of the literature in order to explore the efficacy and safety of administering rituximab directly into the CSF for the treatment of CNS involvement by NHL. Methods: We identified all relevant citations in MEDLINE/EMBASE/CINAHL/BIOSIS Previews from their date of inception to June 20th, 2011. Prospective studies, case reports and case series reporting on intrathecal or intraventricular (via ommaya-reservoir) use of rituximab in relapsed primary (PCNSL) or secondary CNS-lymphoma were included. All articles citing the included articles, as well as the reference lists of included articles were reviewed to ensure capture of all relevant studies. In some cases, authors were contacted to gather additional information. Two authors independently evaluated study eligibility. Disagreements were resolved by consensus and agreement was assessed using the kappa statistic. All non-human studies were excluded. Due to the nature of the studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. Results: The search strategy identified 148 potential reports published between 2002–2011 of which 22 were included (3 prospective trials, 2 phase-I trials, 2 case-series and 15 case reports). The kappa value for inter-author agreement was 0.881. A total of 74 patients, aged 4–84 years old (Mean age 48), with PCNSL (28%) or secondary CNS-Lymphoma (ALL 14%, DLBCL 8%, Burkitt's 4%, Mantle Cell Lymphoma 5%, Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder 4%, Unknown histology 37%), received 1 to 22 doses of 10–50mg of intrathecal (43%) or intraventricular (IVT) rituximab, either alone or in combination with other therapies. At a mean follow-up of 43 weeks (Range 2–178), 34% of patients were in complete remission and 28% showed a partial response. Patients having both leptomeningeal and parenchymal involvement of CNS lymphoma were the most likely to have progression of disease with IT/IVT rituximab (44%), as compared to those with isolated disease in the leptomeninges (29%) or parenchyma (33%). Fifty percent of patients with isolated disease in the leptomeningeal compartment showed complete remission with IVT/IT rituximab therapy. Fatigue, nausea/vomiting and paresthesias were the most commonly reported side effects. In one series, seven patients developed arachnoiditis. There was a single case of Hepatitis B virus reactivation in a patient with parenchymal PCNSL. In addition, our patient developed symptoms and findings consistent with SCD and in whom a relation between SCD and rituximab could not be ruled out. Conclusion: In case series and reports, IT rituximab appears to be a safe and modestly effective therapy when used in conjunction with other salvage therapies for the management of refractory CNS-lymphoma. The overall proportion of complications appears to be reasonably low. To our knowledge, our patient is the first case of SCD reported in a patient who received IT rituximab. Further studies with a particular emphasis on safety are needed before widespread use can be recommended. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Systematic literature review on the use of intrathecal rituximab for CNS lymphoma (off-label use). Lazo-Langner:Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Pfizer Inc.: Honoraria.


2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 315-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coleen Klasmeier ◽  
Martin H. Redish

In order to protect the nation from harmful or worthless drugs and devices, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is legislatively authorized to restrict the sale of prescription drugs or medical devices to those whose efficacy and safety have been reviewed and approved by the Agency. Drugs and devices are approved for a specific medical purpose. In numerous instances, however, the medical profession has discovered that treatments approved for one purpose may also serve other valuable medical purposes. Indeed, on a number of occasions such “off-label” treatments have proven to be essential to the successful treatment of some very serious illnesses.In these off-label situations, the FDA is faced with a dilemma. On the one hand, off-label use of prescription drug and devices gives rise to a series of major problems for the FDA. While the drug and devices in question have been vetted and approved by the FDA for their designated purpose, at no point has the FDA reviewed the supporting scientific data to determine efficacy for the off-label purpose.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ane Bayona Cebada ◽  
Lía Nattero-Chávez ◽  
Sara Alonso Díaz ◽  
Héctor F. Escobar-Morreale ◽  
Manuel Luque-Ramírez

2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Danivas ◽  
NagarajS Moily ◽  
Rohini Thimmaiah ◽  
Kesavan Muralidharan ◽  
Meera Purushotham ◽  
...  

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Gupta ◽  
Jennifer L. Vincent ◽  
Bradford Frank

ABSTRACTWe describe a retrospective case series of three patients, two with bipolar depression and one with unipolar depression. Pramipexole is a Food and Drug Administration-approved antiparkinsonian agent, which, when used to augment antidepressants, would be considered an off-label use and should be discussed with the patient. These patients had robust responses to pramipexole augmentation of their treatment regimen. All three patients had been taking an atypical antipsychotic. The depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.


2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 527.2-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Iaccarino ◽  
S. De Vita ◽  
G. Ferraccioli ◽  
M. Galeazzi ◽  
R. Gerli ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-201
Author(s):  
L R Akhmadeeva ◽  
Kh P Derevyanko

The modern view on the application of botulinum toxin type A for the off-label use in neurology and foreign experience analysis are presented. The «off-label» category referred to any prescription of a medication in case of using it for unregistered indications, with product instruction violation or in the presence of contraindications including age restrictions. The sources of information about medicines were the leaflets of manufacturers of medicines and the State Register of Medicines. It is well known that Botulinum toxin type A is a good therapeutic option for treating children with cerebral palsy. Increased efficacy of regularly repeated cycles with Onabotulinumtoxin A in medication-overuse headache patients beyond the first year of treatment. Botulinum toxin type A is effective in the management of sialorrhea. Botulinum toxin type A is a safe and effective treatment for primary axillary hyperhidrosis and produces high levels of patient satisfaction. Facing depression with botulinum toxin: positive effects on mood have been observed in subjects who underwent treatment of glabellar frown lines with botulinum toxin and, in an open case series, depression remitted or improved after such a treatment. Botox injection significantly improved foot dystonia, pain and lower limb functional outcomes in patients with Parkinson’s disease with deep brain stimulation. The paper describes the problems associated with the lack of clinical data about the possibility of using botulinum toxin type A in different conditions, emphasizes the need to organize clinical trials and educational programs for neurologists as well as more active implementation of protocols for the treatment of patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S337-S337
Author(s):  
Jolie Gallagher ◽  
Kevin H Hall ◽  
Benjamin Albrecht

Abstract Background Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against the CD20 antigen on B-lymphocytes leading to B-cell death and depletion. Patients who receive rituximab and are infected with the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2) causing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may have increased difficultly clearing the virus and be at risk for persistent disease. While the limited literature available is mixed regarding the severity of COVID-19 in patients receiving rituximab, there is minimal literature regarding persistent and relapsing COVID-19 in this patient population. This is a case series of patients with persistent COVID-19 who previously received rituximab. Methods This is a retrospective review of 5 patients admitted between 1/1/2021 and 5/1/2021 to our institution with confirmed COVID-19 and receipt of rituximab for any indication within the previous 12 months. Information regarding hospital readmissions, time course of positive infection, medical management, disease severity, and discharge disposition were collected. Results Five patients, median age of 46, currently or recently on rituximab therapy were admitted a median of 2 times due to persistent, severe COVID-19 (Table 1). Patients received their initial COVID-19 diagnosis a median of 34 days (8-102 days) since their last rituximab administration and had documented SARS-CoV-2 infection a median of 66 days (19-195 days; Figure 1). All 5 patients received remdesivir and corticosteroids over the course of their COVID-19 disease and 2 patients received convalescent plasma therapy 1 and 5 days prior to a positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody IgG. Figure 1. Patient SARS-CoV-2 Infection Course Table 1. Patient Clinical and Therapeutic Data Conclusion Rituximab therapy may be associated with persistent or relapsing COVID-19 disease. Controlled investigations are necessary to evaluate the exact impact anti-CD20 agents have on the course of COVID-19 and whether convalescent plasma or other therapies can prevent relapsing disease. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1129
Author(s):  
Lucia Brescini ◽  
Filippo Della Martera ◽  
Gianluca Morroni ◽  
Sara Mazzanti ◽  
Maria Di Pietrantonio ◽  
...  

Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety in all patients who received at least one administration of dalbavancin. Methods: We carried out a retrospective study of the use of dalbavancin in 55 patients at the Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I (Ancona, Italy) from February 2017 to May 2020 and compared “on label” and “off label” use of dalbavancin in ABSSSI and non-ABSSSI. Results: A total of 55 patients were included in the study. The median age was 61 years; 51% had ABSSSI; 24% had prosthetic joint infections, and 14% had osteomyelitis. A total of 53% received a single 1500 mg infusion of dalbavancin, and 18% received a second dose 14 days later; 24% of patients received further doses at 14-day intervals. In 91% of cases, patients achieved clinical objectives with dalbavancin: 96% of patients with ABSSSI and 69% of those with prosthetic joint infections. Conclusions: Dalbavancin was shown to have an excellent tolerability profile and to be a highly successful therapeutic approach even in those cases treated “off-label”.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document