Egg-derived anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin Y (IgY) with broad variant activity as intranasal prophylaxis against COVID-19: preclinical studies and randomized controlled phase 1 clinical trial

COVID-19 emergency use authorizations and approvals for vaccines were achieved in record time. However, there remains a need to develop additional safe, effective, easy-to-produce, and inexpensive prevention to reduce the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection. This need is due to difficulties in vaccine manufacturing and distribution, vaccine hesitancy, and, critically, the increased prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with greater contagiousness or reduced sensitivity to immunity. Antibodies from eggs of hens (immunoglobulin Y; IgY) that were administered receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were developed as nasal drops to capture the virus on the nasal mucosa. Although initially raised against the 2019 novel coronavirus index strain (2019-nCoV), these anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgY surprisingly had indistinguishable enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay binding against variants of concern that have emerged, including Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529). This is distinct for sera from immunized or convalescent patients. Culture neutralization titers against available Alpha, Beta, and Delta were also indistinguishable from the index SARS-CoV-2 strain. Efforts to develop these IgY for clinical use demonstrated that the intranasal anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgY preparation showed no binding (cross-reactivity) to a variety of human tissues and had an excellent safety profile in rats following 28-day intranasal delivery of the formulated IgY. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1 study evaluating single-ascending and multiple doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgY administered intranasally for 14 days in 48 healthy participants also demonstrated an excellent safety and tolerability profile, and no evidence of systemic absorption. As these antiviral IgY have broad selectivity against many variants of concern, are fast to produce, and are a low-cost product, their use as prophylaxis to reduce SARS-CoV-2 viral transmission warrants further evaluation.

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for prevention of migraine: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled PREMIUM II trial

Aim Evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for migraine prevention. Methods After completing a 4-week diary run-in period, adults who had migraine with or without aura were randomly assigned to receive active non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation or sham therapy during a 12-week double-blind period. Results Of 336 enrolled participants, 113 (active, n = 56; sham, n = 57) completed ≥70 days of the double-blind period and were ≥66% adherent with treatment, comprising the prespecified modified intention-to-treat population. The COVID-19 pandemic led to early trial termination, and the population was ∼60% smaller than the statistical target for full power. Mean reduction in monthly migraine days (primary endpoint) was 3.12 for the active group and 2.29 days for the sham group (difference, −0.83; p = 0.2329). Responder rate (i.e. the percentage of participants with a ≥50% reduction in migraine days) was greater in the active group (44.87%) than the sham group (26.81%; p = 0.0481). Prespecified subgroup analysis suggested that participants with aura responded preferentially. No serious device-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions These results suggest clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for migraine prevention, particularly for patients who have migraine with aura, and reinforce the well-established safety and tolerability profile of this therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03716505).

Safety and efficacy of repeat long-term incobotulinumtoxinA treatment for lower limb or combined upper/lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy

PURPOSE: The open-label phase 3 ‘Treatment with IncobotulinumtoxinA in Movement Open-Label’ (TIMO) study investigated longer-term safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxin A in children/adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: Patients on standard treatment, with unilateral or bilateral lower limb (LL) or combined upper limb (UL)/LL spasticity received four incobotulinumtoxinA injection cycles (16 or 20 Units/kg bodyweight total [maximum 400 or 500 Units] per cycle depending on ambulatory status/clinical pattern treated), each followed by 12–16 weeks’ observation. Treatment for pes equinus was mandatory; flexed knee or adducted thigh were options for unilateral treatment and/or ULs for unilateral/bilateral treatment. The primary endpoint was safety; changes in Ashworth Scale and Gross Motor Function Measure-66 scores, and Global Impression of Change Scale scores at week 4 of each injection cycle were also evaluated. RESULTS: IncobotulinumtoxinA (≤500 Units for ≤98 weeks) was safe, well-tolerated, and effective across all endpoints for multipattern treatment of LL and combined LL/UL spasticity in ambulant/nonambulant children/adolescents with CP. Treatment effects increased with each injection cycle. No new/unexpected safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSION: IncobotulinumtoxinA showed a good safety and tolerability profile, with efficacy over multiple clinical presentations. As an adjunct treatment, it offers an effective, individualized treatment option for pediatric CP-related spasticity.

Cariprazine in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: Within and Beyond Clinical Trials

Bipolar disorder (BD) is chronic psychiatric disorder associated with significant impairment in psychosocial functioning and quality of life. Although current pharmacological treatments for BD have improved its clinical management, many patients do not achieve remission, particularly those suffering from bipolar depression. In addition, available treatments are associated with a myriad of potential adverse effects, which highlights the need for novel therapeutic agents that can be effective for both phases of the illness with a reduced side effect burden. Cariprazine is a novel antipsychotic that is a dopamine D2/D3 partial agonist with a preference for D3 receptors. In this review, we examine the pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability profile of cariprazine in patients with BD, taking into account the latest clinical trials data. We also review post hoc analyses addressing clinically relevant subgroups and symptom domains in BD. Current evidence suggests efficacy for cariprazine 3–12 mg/day in the treatment of acute manic and mixed episodes; for bipolar depression, the efficacy of cariprazine appears to be dose-related, with doses of 1.5–3 mg/day beneficial as monotherapy. Cariprazine is overall well-tolerated by patients in both manic and depressive episodes. Its most common side effects relative to placebo include akathisia, extrapyramidal symptoms and nausea. There are no metabolic concerns reported with cariprazine use. In summary, the latest evidence suggests that cariprazine is an effective and safe treatment option for BD.

Preclinical efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of PHH-1V, a second-generation COVID-19 vaccine candidate based on a novel recombinant RBD fusion heterodimer of SARS-CoV-2.

Since the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 became available in January 2020, new vaccines have been developed at an unprecedented speed. The current vaccines have been directly associated with a decline in new infection rates, prevention of severe disease and an outstanding decrease in mortality rates. However, the pandemic is still far from being over. New Variants of Concern (VoCs) are continuously evolving. Thus, it is essential to develop accessible second-generation COVID-19 vaccines against known and future VoCs to mitigate the current pandemic. Here, we provide preclinical data showing the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety results in mice of a receptor-binding domain (RBD)-based recombinant protein vaccine candidate (PHH-1V) which consists of a novel RBD fusion heterodimer containing the B.1.1.7 (alpha) and B.1.351 (beta) variants of SARS-CoV-2, formulated with an oil-based adjuvant equivalent to MF59C.1. BALB/c and K18-hACE2 mice were immunized with different doses of recombinant RBD fusion heterodimer, following a two-dose prime-and-boost schedule. Upon 20 μg RBD fusion heterodimer/dose immunization, BALB/c mice produced RBD-binding antibodies with neutralising activity against the alpha, beta, gamma, and delta variants. Furthermore, vaccination elicited robust activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with early expression of Th1 cytokines upon in vitro restimulation, along with a good tolerability profile. Importantly, vaccination with 10 μg or 20 μg RBD fusion heterodimer/dose conferred 100% efficacy preventing mortality and bodyweight loss upon SARS-CoV-2 challenge in K18-hACE2 mice. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of this novel recombinant vaccine strategy, allowing the inclusion of up to 2 different RBD proteins in the same vaccine. Most importantly, this new platform is easy to adapt to future VoCs and has a good stability profile, thus ensuring its global distribution.

Clinical Safety and Tolerability of A2NTX, a Novel Low-Molecular-Weight Neurotoxin Derived from Botulinum Neurotoxin Subtype A2, in Comparison with Subtype A1 Toxins

All the botulinum type A neurotoxins available for clinical use are of the A1 subtype. We developed a subtype A2 low-molecular-weight (150 kD (kilo Dalton)) neurotoxin (A2NTX) with less spread and faster entry into the motor nerve terminal than A1 in vitro and in vivo. Preliminary clinical studies showed that its efficacy is superior to A1 toxins. We conducted an open study exploring its safety and tolerability profile in comparison with A1LL (LL type A1 toxin, or onabotulinumtoxinA) and a low-molecular-weight (150 kD) A1 neurotoxin (A1NTX). Those who had been using A1LL (n = 90; 50–360 mouse LD50 units) or A1NTX (n = 30; 50–580 units) were switched to A2NTX (n = 120; 25–600 units) from 2010 to 2018 (number of sessions ~27, cumulative doses ~11,640 units per patient). The adverse events for A2NTX included weakness (n = 1, ascribed to alcoholic polyneuropathy), dysphagia (1), local weakness (4), and spread to other muscles (1), whereas those for A1LL or A1NTX comprised weakness (n = 2, A1NTX), dysphagia (8), ptosis (6), local weakness (7), and spread to other muscles (15). After injections, 89 out of 120 patients preferred A2NTX to A1 for the successive sessions. The present study demonstrated that A2NTX had clinical safety up to the dose of 500 units and was well tolerated compared to A1 toxins.

Oteseconazole: an advance in treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) has significant disease, financial and quality-of-life burdens, affects women from all strata of society worldwide, and lacks an approved therapeutic solution. Fluconazole emerged in 2004 as an antifungal for RVVC; it provides symptom control and has been accepted worldwide as a first-line treatment. Its limitations include the development of resistance and a high rate of vulvovaginal candidiasis recurrence after therapy cessation. There is now an improved treatment option on the horizon: oteseconazole – a novel, oral, selective fungal cytochrome P450 enzyme 51 inhibitor, designed to avoid off-target toxicities. In clinical studies to date, oteseconazole has demonstrated impressive efficacy, a positive tolerability profile and hope for a superior RVVC treatment option.

Sacubitril-Valsartan, Clinical Benefits and Related Mechanisms of Action in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. A Review

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome characterized by the presence of dyspnea or limited exertion due to impaired cardiac ventricular filling and/or blood ejection. Because of its high prevalence, it is a major health and economic burden worldwide. Several mechanisms are involved in the pathophysiology of HF. First, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is over-activated, causing vasoconstriction, hypertension, elevated aldosterone levels and sympathetic tone, and eventually cardiac remodeling. Second, an endogenous compensatory mechanism, the natriuretic peptide (NP) system is also activated, albeit insufficiently to counteract the RAAS effects. Since NPs are degraded by the enzyme neprilysin, it was hypothesized that its inhibition could be an important therapeutic target in HF. Sacubitril/valsartan is the first of the class of dual neprilysin and angiotensin receptor inhibitors (ARNI). In patients with HFrEF, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan has demonstrated to significantly reduce mortality and the rates of hospitalization and rehospitalization for HF when compared to enalapril. This communication reviews in detail the demonstrated benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of patients with HFrEF, including reduction of mortality and disease progression as well as improvement in cardiac remodeling and quality of life. The hemodynamic and organic effects arising from its dual mechanism of action, including the impact of neprilysin inhibition at the renal level, especially relevant in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, are also reviewed. Finally, the evidence on the demonstrated safety and tolerability profile of sacubitril/valsartan in the different subpopulations studied has been compiled. The review of this evidence, together with the recommendations of the latest clinical guidelines, position sacubitril/valsartan as a fundamental pillar in the treatment of patients with HFrEF.

Safety of Emapalumab in Pediatric Patients with Primary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH): Relationship to Treatment Exposure

Introduction: Primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare, life-threatening, immune disorder characterized by a hyperinflammatory state in which interferon gamma (IFNγ) is considered a key cytokine. The treatment goal of primary HLH is to stabilize the disease by controlling the associated hyperinflammation to bring patients to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the only curative therapy so far. Current conventional therapy for HLH is based on immunochemotherapies, namely etoposide and glucocorticoids; this treatment, however, is associated with opportunistic infections and severe myelotoxicity. Emapalumab, a fully human, anti-IFNγ monoclonal antibody that neutralizes IFNγ, is the only FDA-approved treatment for primary HLH patients with refractory, recurrent or progressive disease, or intolerance to conventional HLH therapy. In patients with primary HLH, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of emapalumab is highly influenced by body weight, and also by IFNγ production due to target-mediated drug disposition. In the pivotal trial (Locatelli et al NEJM 2020;382:1811-22), treatment of primary HLH patients with emapalumab was associated with a favorable safety and tolerability profile, with no unexpected safety concerns. Objective: To describe prespecified exploratory exposure-safety analyses that were performed on data from patients with primary HLH receiving emapalumab in the pivotal trial. Methods: Data from a multicenter, open-label, pivotal phase 2/3 study (NCT01818492) and its long-term follow-up study (NCT02069899) were included in this analysis. The safety of emapalumab was assessed in 34 patients (27 treatment experienced; 7 treatment naïve) with active primary HLH. Emapalumab was initiated at a dose of 1 mg/kg administered intravenously every 3 days, on a background of dexamethasone 5-10 mg/kg/day. Subsequent doses could be increased to 3, 6 and 10 mg/kg, if required, based on predefined laboratory and clinical response parameters. Treatment duration was up to 8 weeks, with possible shortening to a minimum of 4 weeks, or extension up to time of transplantation if needed. Exploratory graphical analyses were performed to determine the incidence of adverse events (AEs) as a function of the exposure parameters at the time of the AE. The relationship between emapalumab exposure and the incidence of treatment-emergent AEs, serious AEs, severe AEs, and AEs related to infections and infusion-related reactions (IRRs) was explored by logistic regression analyses. Selected parameters of renal (creatine clearance [CRCL]) and liver (total bilirubin [TBIL] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT]) function were explored graphically. Exposure parameters were obtained from the population PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) data file that was used for the population PK and PK/PD analyses. Observed individual concentration-time data were used to derive the individual exposure parameters as a function of time. The analyses considered AEs that emerged after the start of the first infusion until last infusion and prior to initiation of HSCT conditioning. Results: Exploratory graphical exposure-safety analyses did not reveal any apparent relationship between the number of AEs and exposure to emapalumab. Logistic exposure-safety regression analyses using the observed exposure to emapalumab at the time of an AE for patients experiencing an event and the highest observed exposure to emapalumab for those patients experiencing no AE, indicated that the incidence of AEs did not increase as a function of increasing emapalumab concentration. In fact, a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of severe AEs and the incidence of AEs related to IRRs was observed. No multivariate effects were identified in the multivariate regression analyses. No clear trend was observed for TBIL, ALT or CRCL as a function of the duration of emapalumab treatment. The exposure of emapalumab did not appear to influence the levels of TBIL, ALT or CRCL in individual patients during treatment. Conclusion: In this study, the exposure-safety evaluation did not reveal any significant relationships between exposure to emapalumab and observed incidence rates of AEs, serious AEs, infections, or IRRs. These findings support the primary evidence of a favorable benefit-risk profile of emapalumab across the dose range used in this fragile patient population. Disclosures Jordan: Sobi: Consultancy. Locatelli: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharamceutical: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Jacqmin: Sobi: Consultancy. Laveille: Sobi: Consultancy. Snoeck: Sobi: Consultancy. de Min: Sobi: Consultancy, Ended employment in the past 24 months.

A Phase II Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Polatuzumab Vedotin in Combination with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone in Patients with Previously Untreated Double and Triple Hit Lymphoma

Background: Double hit lymphoma (DHL) accounts for approximately 10-14% of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and is characterized by the presence of rearrangements affecting MYC and either BCL2 and/or BCL6 by FISH. The complete response (CR) rate with standard R-CHOP is very poor at 20%, with dismal long-term progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Aggressive chemotherapy regimens including R-EPOCH, R-HyperCVAD/MA, and R-CODOX-M/IVAC have been evaluated in retrospective studies and have demonstrated better PFS compared to R-CHOP. However, no OS benefit is noted. Moreover, these regimens are associated with significant toxicity and cannot be used in a substantial proportion of patients due to advanced age and comorbidities, and have not been evaluated in prospectively studies. Therefore, new therapeutic modalities, which are better tolerated, are indeed needed to improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Polatuzumab vedotin (PoV) is a CD79b-directed antibody-drug conjugate delivering monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). PoV either as a single agent or with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) demonstrated encouraging activity in relapsed refractory DLBCL with an overall response rate (ORR) of approximately 50%. Given the promising activity, PoV has been combined with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone (R-CHP) in a phase 1b/2 trial, and has shown a favorable safety and tolerability profile. Study design and Methods: This is a phase II, multicenter, open label study of PoV 1.8 mg/kg in combination with standard doses of R-CHP in patients with untreated double or triple hit lymphoma. One cycle of R-CHOP prior to enrollment is allowed. Key eligibility criteria include patients aged > 18 years with previously untreated double or triple hit lymphoma, ECOG PS 0 to 2, measurable FDG-avid disease. Key exclusion criteria are DLBCL NOS subtype, primary mediastinal or Burkitt's lymphoma, and CNS involvement. A total of 49 patients will be enrolled. All patients will receive PoV with R-CHP every 3 weeks for a total of 6 cycles with intrathecal methotrexate for CNS prophylaxis. The primary endpoint is CR rate. Key secondary endpoints are PFS, OS, ORR, duration of response, and safety and tolerability of the combination. Disease response will be assessed by the Lugano response criteria. The study is currently enrolling. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04479267. Disclosures Modi: Genentech: Research Funding; Seagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pregja: Janssen: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Caelum: Consultancy; Alnylam: Consultancy; Eidos: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding. Ramchandren: pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; curis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; MERCK: Consultancy, Research Funding; seattle genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding.