Quality Of Life After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation In Patients With Myelofibrosis (CMWP of EBMT)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2974-2974
Author(s):  
Nora Machate ◽  
Haefaa Alchalby ◽  
Susanne Sehner ◽  
Tatjana Zabelina ◽  
Daniel Wolff ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal hematological disorder classified as a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). Bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly and extramedullary hematopoiesis are hallmarks of the disease. Symptomatic burden is present in most of the affected patients and can compromise quality of life (QoL) by its severity. Most patients suffer from constitutional symptoms such as fatigue, pruritus, night sweats, bone pain, fever, early satiety and weight loss. Currently allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative therapy but it is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Infectious complications, acute and chronic GvHD are major complications which influence quality of life after transplantation. Until now, no systematic evaluation of QoL after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis patients exists. Methods In this cross-sectional study we examined 77 patients (male=37, female=40) with a median age of 61 years (range, 40 to 79 years) who received an allogeneic HSCT with a busulfan-based reduced-intensity conditioning from related (n=20) or unrelated donor (n=54) in the period from 1999 to 2011. Diagnosis was primary myelofibrosis in 47 patients and secondary myelofibrosis in 30 patients. At time of transplantation all patients had advanced disease and were classified by the Lille score as high-risk (n=18), intermediate-risk (n=34) and low-risk (n=12) patients. At time of evaluation, 72 patients were in complete remission, 5 patients were not in complete remission, 25 patients suffered from GvHD (limited=14, extensive=11). The patient population was divided into four groups according to the time between transplantation and evaluation of QoL. First group = 6-36 months (n=24); second group= 36-60 months (n=16); third group = 60-85 months (n=22); fourth group 85-146 months after transplantation (n=15). QoL was measured by using the two validated questionnaires FACT-BMT and MPN-SAF. By means of statistical analysis (SPSS; ANCOVA) it was examined whether there are significant differences between the groups. Results According to the MPN-SAF Total Symptom score (the lower the score the better is the Result: possible range= 0-100, the mean scores of the groups one to four are as followed: group1: 18.9 (SD =11.3), group2: 21.1 (SD=17.9), group 3:19.3 (SD=15.5) and group 4: 18.9 (SD=12.4). There were no significant differences between the groups (p=0,962). Unfortunately no MPN-SAF Total Symptoms score was available before transplantation, but according to the mean value of MPN described in the literature (mean=25.3; SD=17.2) the mean score after transplantation (mean=19.5; SD=14.0) of our study population was lower. The mean scores of the FACT-BMT from group one to four were 115.3 (SD=16.6); 120.9 (SD=17.5); 112.4 (SD=15.5) and 115.3 (SD=20.9) There were also no significant differences between the 4 groups (p=0.541). We investigated whether there are significant differences of the results in both questionnaires regarding gender (male/female), donor (unrelated/related), GvHD (yes/no), HLA (matched/mismatched), primary or secondary MF (post-PV/post-ET/PMF), remission (complete/not complete), but none of the variables did influence QoL significantly. The subscales BMTS, FACT-G, and its subscales Physical Well-Being (PWB), Functional Well-Being (FWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB), Social Well-Being (SWB), of the FACT-BMT were calculated and analyzed by ANCOVA. No significant differences were found among the groups. Comparing the mean value of the FACT-G (mean=85.7; SD=13,1; range= 60-108)and its subscales PWB (mean=22.7; SD= 4.5), SWB (mean=22.4; SD=4.7), EWB (mean 19.9; SD=3.1), FWB (mean=20.6; SD=4.7) of our entire patient population with the mean value of a normal population FACT-G (mean=80.1; SD=18.1; range= 15.4-108), PWB (mean=22.7; SD= 5.4), SWB (mean= 19.1; SD=6.8), EWB (mean=19.9; SD=4.8) and FWB (mean=18.5; SD=6.8) our population has even the same or higher scores. Conclusion This cross-sectional study shows that after dose reduced allogeneic stem cell transplantation in MF-patients Physical and Emotional Well Being is almost as good as that of the normal healthy population whereas Social and Functional Well Being seem to be classified as even better than that of a normal population. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 590-590
Author(s):  
Katerina Benesova ◽  
Marie Trnkova ◽  
Miriam Lanska ◽  
Veronika Valkova ◽  
Katerina Steinerova ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 590 Background: Myeloblative conditioning (MAC) or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) followed by autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT or AlloSCT) is established and lifesaving treatment in selected indications. The quality of life (QoL) is then very important issue for long term surviving patients. The majority of data is often based on single center evaluation with limited number of patients. Therefore we have started the cross-sectional QoL project and this analysis is based on data collected from eight transplant centers. Methods: Altogether data from 1399 patients are included in the study. The FACT-G questionnaire (Q) was used for this analysis. The questionnaire consists of four parts - physical well-being (PWB), social/family well-being (SWB), emotional well-being (EWB), functional well-being (FWB). The patients completed the Q before the transplantation (at the time of indication or at the time of admission to SCT) n=304, after ASCT n=662 and after AlloSCT n=433. Patients were divided into 7 groups – before SCT, day +100, up to 1y, 1–2y, 2–3y, 3–5y and more than 5y. The clinical characteristics were obtained from national transplant registry; the data was cleaned and updated. Wilcoxon and Kruskall-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis. Patient′s characteristic: The ASCT and AlloSCT groups (grp.) consist of 869 and 530 pts resp. including 207 pts before ASCT and 97 before AlloSCT. There were 52.8% and 55.7% men in ASCT and AlloSCT grp. resp. The median age in ASCT and AlloSCT grp. resp. was: 55.2 and 43.2y resp., the median follow-up 4.4 and 4.5y resp. The most frequent diagnosis of ASCT group were: Non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma (NHL) 46.1%, multiple myeloma (MM) 36.6%, Hodgkin′s lymphoma (HL) 8.5%. In AlloSCT: acute myelogenous leukemia 29.4%, acute lymphoblastic leukemia 15.7%, chronic myeloid leukemia 11.5% and myelodysplastic syndrome 10.0%. Disease progression/relapse was observed in 148 ASCT (22.4%) and 61 AlloSCT (14.1%) pts. In AlloSCT group MAC was used in 33% pts and matched unrelated donor (MUD) in 59.8% pts., aGVHD gr I-II was observed in 40.3% and gr III-IV 4.2% pts, cGVHD in 37.9% pts. Results: Significant differences in overall QoL before, during and after the AlloSCT (p<0.001) and ASCT (p=0.01) were observed. The QoL was improved from 1y after ASCT as well as from 2y after Allo-SCT. It was due mainly to the PWB and FWB improvement in both SCT groups, SWB and EWB remained unchanged. Long term survivors reported better QoL vs pts before transplant both in the alloSCT gr. (89 vs 80.7 points) as well as in ASCT gr.(82 vs 73.1). Interestingly, significantly better QoL in AlloSCT vs ASCT gr. was reported in all time points except day +100 and 2y. At the time of indication it was 80.7 vs 73.1 (p=0.035) and the most significant difference was among long-term survivors 89.0 vs 82.0 (p<0.001). The overall QoL was not affected by gender, women only reported better SWB in AlloSCT and ASCT grp. and men reported better EWB in ASCT gr. The age had significant impact on overall QoL in ASCT (p=0.005) and AlloSCT (p=0.006) but only due to difference in PWB and FWB resp., which was more profound in AlloSCT (p<0.001). The diagnosis had no impact on QoL in AlloSCT grp. but the MM pts have significantly lower QoL compared to NHL and HL pts. resp. (73 vs 80 vs 82 resp. p<0.001) in ASCT group. There was no significant impact of MAC or RIC on the QoL, patients with MUD has lower QoL compared to sibling donor (84.8 vs 88, p<0.05). Relapse after transplantation was associated with worse QoL, after ASCT 74 vs 81 (p=0.02) and after AlloSCT 81.5 vs 87.5 (borderline significance p =0.065). The long term survivor′s QoL was not affected by aGVHD in contrast to the cGVHD which significantly affects QoL (p<0.001) due to lower PWB (p<0.001) and FWB (p<0.001). Conclusion: We herein demostrate on large cohorts of pts that long term survivors have significantly better QoL compared to QoL in the time of indication of the transplantation and the improvement starts from 1y after ASCT and from 2y after AlloSCT. AlloSCT survivors report better QoL compared to the ASCT survivors. The most important factors affected QoL are age, cGVHD (AlloSCT) and diagnosis (ASCT), the borderline factors are relapse after SCT and type of donor (AlloSCT). Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Neslisah Yasar ◽  
Semiha Akin

This descriptive study explored the quality of life and care needs of Turkish patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The study sample consisted of 100 hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Their quality of life was assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant Scale. The mean patient age was 44.99 ± 13.92 years. Changes in sexual functions, loss of hair, loss of taste, loss of appetite, and sleep disturbances were the most common symptoms. The quality of life of transplant patients was moderately affected; the functional well-being and social/family well-being subscales were the most adversely and least negatively affected (12.13 ± 6.88) dimensions, respectively. Being female, being between 50 and 59 years of age, being single, having a chronic disease, and having a history of hospitalization were associated with lower quality of life scores. Interventions to improve functional status, physical well-being, and emotional status of patients during the transplantation process may help patients cope with treatment-related impairments more effectively. Frequent screening and management of patient symptoms in order to help patients adapt to life following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are crucial for meeting care needs and developing strategies to improve their quality of life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document