a Phase 2 Study of Alemtuzumab-Ofatumumab (A+O) Combination in Patients with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Abstract Background Current standard immunochemotherapy is highly effective as frontline treatment of CLL but has several limitations including poor tolerability in older patients with comorbidities, potential long-term marrow toxicity, and limited efficacy in high risk CLL. Therapy with monoclonal antibodies alone may offer an alternative, non-stem cell toxic treatment option. Our prior study of alemtuzumab-rituximab in previously untreated CLL showed promising results with good tolerability although lymph node responses were suboptimal (Frankfurt et al., Leuk Lymphoma 2014). Ofatumumab showed improved complement-mediated cytotoxicity over rituximab for CLL in vitro and significant clinical activity in refractory CLL. In this study we aim to test safety and effectiveness of alemtuzumab-ofatumumab (A+O) combination as a frontline treatment for CLL. Methods This phase 2 study of A+O first-line treatment for CLL is conducted at Northwestern University in Chicago and Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm with an accrual goal of 60 patients. Eligibility requires symptomatic, previously untreated CLL, and PS ≤ 2. There was no exclusion for baseline cytopenia or upper age limit. Alemtuzumab (Alem) is given subcutaneously tiw for up to 18 weeks (dose escalation 3mg-10mg-30mg for week 1 and 30mg per dose for subsequent weeks). Starting week 3, ofatumumab (Ofa) is added intravenously q2 weeks up to 8 doses at 300mg for dose 1 and 2000mg for doses 2-8. All patients received anti-herpes, anti-fungal and anti-PCP prophylaxis. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) was monitored by PCR every other week. Bone-marrow biopsy and CT scans are required for response assessment (IWCLL 2008 criteria). Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in bone-marrow using 6-color flow. Hematologic toxicity was assessed using IWCLL 2008 criteria and non-hematologic toxicity graded by CTCAE 4.0. Results To date the study has enrolled 41 patients among whom 31 patients have completed treatment and are reported here in this interim analysis. Median age was 63 (45-77) years; 58% had Rai stage III/IV; 48% had unmutated IgHV, and 7/31 were 17p- and/or had TP53 mutation. During initial safety run-in period to assess dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), one patient after 18 weeks of therapy developed prolonged cytopenia and died of sepsis, and another patient after 14 weeks of therapy developed grade 4 neutropenia which resolved after 16 days. Both patients achieved MRD-negative complete bone-marrow response with hypocellularity. It was speculated that the cause may be continued treatment with Alem beyond the point of MRD-negative CR in bone-marrow. Early stopping rules were implemented using BM biopsy after 9 and 12 weeks of treatment. Alem is stopped if CR in the bone-marrow is achieved, or if cellularity <10%. Ofa is stopped if CR in lymph-nodes on CT after achieving bone-marrow CR. Since this protocol modification after the initial 9 patients, no further DLT was observed and the safety committee approved continued enrollment. The most frequent treatment-emergent AE included neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, Alem-related local injection-site reaction, Ofa-related infusion-symptoms, pyrexia, and fatigue. Grade 3-4 hematologic AEs included neutropenia (39%), thrombocytopenia (26%). The most frequent Grade 3-4 non-hematologic AE was febrile neutropenia (23%). CMV-reactivation occurred in 16 cases successfully treated with oral valganciclovir or IV ganciclovir. All patients achieved blood lymphocyte response within 4 weeks. Of 31 patients evaluable for response, 11 met early stopping criteria after achieving MRD-negative bone marrow CR (8/11 overall CR) with a median of 10 weeks of Alem and 5 doses of Ofa. The remaining patients (except one with PD) completed all 18 weeks of Alem and 8 doses of Ofa treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) was 97% with 42% CR and 55% PR. MRD by bone marrow flow-cytometry was negative in 12/13 CR patients and 4/17 PR patients. All but one patient remain alive at follow-up and three required subsequent treatment due to progressive disease. Conclusions The combination of alemtuzumab-ofatumumab as first-line CLL treatment produced high response rates, including MRD-negative CR, and had acceptable safety. Early stop after achieving CR prevented late-onset cytopenia. Disclosures Ma: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Oncology Research Program: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Alemtuzumab and ofatumumab used in combination. Österborg:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Lundin:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 Study of Alemtuzumab-Ofatumumab (A+O) Combination in Patients with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) - an Update

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1734.1734 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1734-1734

Author(s):

Jeanette Lundin ◽

Steven T. Rosen ◽

Anders Österborg ◽

Olga Frankfurt ◽

Jane N. Winter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Early Stopping ◽

First Line ◽

Percent Change ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Frontline Treatment ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background The current standard immunochemotherapy for frontline treatment of CLL is highly effective but has poor tolerance in older patients with comorbidities, potential long-term marrow toxicity, and limited efficacy in high risk CLL. Monoclonal antibody combination may offer an alternative, non-stem cell toxic treatment option. Here we update the safety and effectiveness of alemtuzumab-ofatumumab (A+O) combination as a frontline treatment for CLL. Methods This phase 2 study is conducted at Northwestern University and Karolinska University Hospital with an accrual goal of 60 patients. Eligibility requires symptomatic, previously untreated CLL, and PS ≤ 2. Alemtuzumab (Alem) is given subcutaneously tiw for up to 18 weeks (dose escalation 3mg-10mg-30mg for week 1 and 30mg per dose for subsequent weeks). Starting week 3, ofatumumab (Ofa) is added intravenously q2 weeks up to 8 doses at 300mg for dose 1 and 2000mg for doses 2-8. All patients received anti-herpes, anti-fungal and anti-pneumocystis prophylaxis. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) was monitored by PCR every other week. Bone-marrow biopsy and CT scans are required for response assessment (IWCLL 2008 criteria). Minimal residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow was assessed using 6-color flow. Hematologic toxicity was assessed using IWCLL 2008 criteria and non-hematologic toxicity graded by CTCAE 4.0. Results By June 22, 2015 the study has enrolled 52 patients among whom 47 patients have completed treatment and the updated efficacy reported here. Median age was 64 (range 45-79) years; 59% had Rai stage III/IV; 48% had unmutated IgHV, and 30% had high-risk cytogenetics with 11q-, 17p- and/or TP53 mutation. One early patient developed prolonged cytopenia after 18 weeks of therapy and died of sepsis; post-therapy bone marrow (BM) biopsy showed hypocellular marrow with no residual CLL (MRD negative). It was speculated that continued treatment with Alem beyond the point of MRD-negative CR in bone marrow might increase the risk of prolonged cytopenia. Early stopping rules were therefore implemented based on BM biopsy after 9 and 12 weeks of treatment. Alem is stopped if CR in the bone-marrow is achieved, or if cellularity <10%. Ofa is stopped if overall CR is confirmed by CT after achieving bone marrow CR. Since this protocol modification after the initial 9 patients, no further dose-limiting toxicity was observed. The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs of all grades included Alem-related injection-site reaction, Ofa-related infusion-reaction, pyrexia, anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, thrombocytopenia and infection. Grade 3-4 hematologic AEs included neutropenia 26%, thrombocytopenia 11%, anemia 2% of patients. The most frequent Grade 3-4 non-hematologic AE was febrile neutropenia (15%). CMV-reactivation occurred in 23 cases among 31 patients whose pre-treatment CMV IgG was positive, all successfully treated with oral valganciclovir or IV ganciclovir. All patients achieved blood lymphocyte response within 4 weeks. Of 47 patients evaluable for response, 16 met early stopping criteria after the interim bone marrow showed MRD-negative status (12 with overall CR) with a median of 9 weeks of Alem and 5 doses of Ofa. The remaining patients (except one with PD) completed all 18 weeks of Alem and 8 doses of Ofa treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) was 98% (46/47) with 47% (22/47) CR. One patient had PD due to Richter's transformation after 9 weeks of study treatment. Morphological CR in bone marrow was observed in 31 (66%) patients, and MRD by bone marrow flow was negative in 27 (57%) patients, including 18 CR and 9 PR pts. All but one patient remain alive. At median follow-up time of 15 months, 16 patients have progressed of whom 11 required additional line(s) of therapy. The estimated 1 year and 2 year PFS are 88% and 52% respectively. Conclusions The combination of alemtuzumab-ofatumumab as first-line CLL treatment is highly effective with high ORR and CR rate including MRD-negative CR, and acceptable safety. Early stop after achieving CR prevented late-onset cytopenia. The use of non-chemotherapy based regimens as first-line therapy in CLL patients merits further investigations. Figure 1. Best Percent Change from Baseline in Bone Marrow Infiltration by CLL Figure 1. Best Percent Change from Baseline in Bone Marrow Infiltration by CLL Disclosures Lundin: Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Alemtuzumab and Ofatumumab combination in frontline treatment of CLL. Österborg:Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Ma:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Giliead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Idera: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Xeme: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The MP0250-CP201 Mirror Study: A Phase 2 Study Update of MP0250 Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapse/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients Previously Exposed to Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Drugs

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129827 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1899-1899 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Norbert Grząśko ◽

Stefan Knop ◽

Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽

Marc S Raab ◽

Jan Dürig ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Proteasome Inhibitors ◽

Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Background Bone marrow neovascularization is a hallmark of multiple myeloma and progression is associated with a substantial increase in pro-angiogenic factors that promote bone marrow angiogenesis, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). At present, anti-angiogenic agents are not part of treatment strategies in multiple myeloma, neither alone nor in combination with approved agents. MP0250 is a first-in-class, tri-specific multi-DARPin® drug candidate neutralizing VEGF-A and HGF as well as binding to human serum albumin to increase plasma half-life. This is a report on early safety and efficacy of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Vd) in RRMM patients that have previously been exposed to proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). Aims To assess the efficacy and safety of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with RRMM (MiRRoR, NCT03136653). Trial Design This trial is recruiting adults ≥18 years of age with RRMM who have progressed after at least two prior treatment regimens including bortezomib and an IMiD. Patients were enrolled to receive iv MP0250 on day 1 + subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11, oral dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12 of each 21-day cycle. Patients will receive treatment until there is documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Methods The primary endpoint is efficacy in terms of overall response rate (ORR) per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety, immunogenicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR). Exploratory endpoints include overall survival, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory biomarkers for HGF and cMET in bone marrow biopsies are detected by IHC; MM specific markers, circulating HGF and VEGF levels are measured using patient plasma samples. Results As of 01 July 2019, 20 patients (7 ongoing) received a total of 137 doses (1-33 cycles) of MP0250 at the maximum tolerated dose of 8 mg/kg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Vd. Median age was 61 years (46-76), median time since diagnosis was 6.7 years. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 2-9). All 20 patients had prior exposure to IMiDs and PIs and 9 patients received PI-based regimens as their immediate prior line of therapy before start of MP0250 + Vd. Importantly, 6 out of these 9 patients achieved responses ≥ Partial Response (PR). Treatment had been discontinued in 40% of patients due to PD, 15% due to Adverse Event (AE), 5% due to physician's decision and in 1 case at patient's request. The most frequent drug-related grade 3/4 AEs were hypertension in 7/1 patients, thrombocytopenia in 4/1 patients, grade 3 proteinuria in 4 patients and grade 3 anemia in 4 patients. There were no infusion-related reactions. No treatment-related deaths were reported. 20 patients received ≥ 1 dose of MP0250 + Vd and had at least 1 assessment of response and were included in the efficacy analysis. 1 patient (5%) achieved Complete Response, 4 patients achieved Very Good Partial Response (20%) and 3 patients achieved PR (15%) for an ORR of 40%. DOR at cutoff date is 6 months (range, 2-21). Pharmacokinetic data show sustained exposure over multiple cycles with a mean half-life of 11 days (range, 6-17). No indication of ADA-mediated drug clearance was observed. Summary Combining MP250 at 8 mg/kg with standard doses of bortezomib and dexamethasone was generally well tolerated with discontinuation due to AE in only 15% of patients. No unexpected toxicity was observed and AEs consistent with the toxicity profile of the individual agents. Analysis of the preliminary efficacy results showed an encouraging ORR of 40%. Recruitment to this Phase 2 study is ongoing. Disclosures Knop: Janssen, AMGEN, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Stiftung: Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dürig:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel or accommodations, Speakers Bureau. Bringhen:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gamberi:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Castellano Acosta:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lang:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lemaillet:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Sudhir:Molecular Partners AG: Employment.

Download Full-text

Plerixafor, G-CSF and Azacitidine For The Treatment Of MDS: Results Of a Phase I Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.2816.2816 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 2816-2816

Author(s):

Mark A. Schroeder ◽

Marcus Grillot ◽

Teresa Reineck ◽

Meagan A Jacoby ◽

Rizwan Romee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Phase I ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Response Rates ◽

Response To Treatment ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Azacitidine has been shown to prolong survival and delay progression to leukemia in intermediate-2 and high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in a randomized study compared to best supportive care. The combination of G-CSF and plerixafor is synergistic in increasing the release of stem and progenitor cells from the bone marrow through disruption of critical bone marrow stromal interactions including the CXCR4 / CXCL12 axis. The interaction of bone marrow stromal cells with the MDS tumor clone may play a roll in pathogenesis and response to treatment. We hypothesized that resistance of MDS to azacitidine may be related to MDS tumor and BM-stromal cell interactions, and disruption of these interactions by treatment with plerixafor + G-CSF could enhance sensitivity to azacitidine, thus improving complete and partial response rates. We conducted a phase I trial to investigate the safety and tolerability of plerixafor + G-CSF in combination with azacitidine in adult (18 years or older) MDS patients. Secondary objectives included response rates and biologic correlates evaluating: kinetics, phenotype, cell cycle status and kinetics of mobilization of MDS blasts compared to normal stem cells in select patients with informative cytogenetics. Major inclusion criteria included MDS defined by WHO criteria, 5 – 20% blasts on bone marrow aspirate, and at least one cytopenia in one cell lineage. Subjects receiving prior hypomethylating therapy were allowed. A standard 3+3 trial with 3 cohorts (320, 440, and 560 mcg/kg/day SC) was conducted. Dose limiting toxicity was defined as grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity and hematologic toxicity of leukostasis or tumor lysis. Myelosuppression, infection, grade III nausea, fatigue, weight loss and electrolyte abnormalities were not considered dose limiting. Subjects initially received G-CSF 10 mcg/kg subcutaneous (SC) daily D1 – D8, plerixafor SC daily D3 – D8 and azacitidine 75mg/m2 SC D3 – D8, 4 hours after plerixafor administration. The trial was amended after the first 3 subjects to reduce G-CSF dose and administration to 5 days. Results Two of the first three subjects enrolled in cohort 1 (320 mcg/kg/d plerixafor) had leukocytosis. The trial was amended to reduce the G-CSF dose (10 mcg/kg to 5 mcg/kg) and duration (8 days to 5 days) because of this. One subject had symptoms of leukostasis with a WBC reaching nearly 100K/uL and a subsequent subject developed hyperleukocytosis (WBC = 80K/uL) without leukostasis. The trial was amended to reduce the G-CSF to 5 days concurrent with plerixafor and azacitidine along with defining dose holding parameters for G-CSF and plerixafor if the peripheral blood WBC exceeded 40K/uL or if absolute blast count exceeded 10K/uL. Since amendment of the trial, 64 subjects have been screened and 20 subjects have been enrolled and are evaluable. Subjects included 65% males, median age 67, and MDS diagnosis at study entry including 6/18 (33%) RAEB-1 and 12/18 (67%) RAEB-2. 5/18 subjects (28%) had plerixafor and G-CSF held during treatment because of leukocytosis. 9/18 subjects (50%) had received no prior treatment for their MDS. DLTs were experienced in Cohort 1 related to thrombocytosis (n =1) and in Cohort 2 related to atrial fibrillation (n = 1) with near syncope. Major non-hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse events included epistaxis, hypocalcemia, GI bleed, headache, dyspnea, infection with neutropenia, and bone pain. The MTD was determined to be 560mcg/kg plerixafor SC with no subjects (n = 6) in this cohort experiencing a DLT. The median number of cycles completed was 3. Reasons for stopping treatment included progression to leukemia (n = 6), physician choice (n = 2), withdrawal of consent (n = 1), adverse event (n = 2). Best response in those evaluable after completing 2 cycles of treatment (n = 14) showed marrow CR in 5/14 (36%, 3 in those not previously treated for MDS), stable disease in 5/14 (36%) and progressive disease 4/14 (29%). Conclusion Plerixafor plus G-CSF in combination with azacitidine was well tolerated in the studied MDS patients when given over 5 days and may be associated with encouraging response rates. Correlative studies are ongoing to evaluate changes in cell cycle, apoptosis and preferential mobilization of blasts using this regimen. We are currently enrolling an expanded cohort of 7 subjects at the MTD dose to evaluate preferential mobilization of blasts with plerixafor alone in cases using informative cytogenetics. Disclosures: Schroeder: Celgene: Research Funding; Sanofi Oncology: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Plerixafor and G-CSF for the treatment of MDS. Welch:Eisai: Research Funding. Stockerl-Goldstein:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene : Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Trial of G-CSF, Cladribine, Cytarabine, and Dose-Escalated Mitoxantrone (G-CLAM) in Adults with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1339.1339 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1339-1339

Author(s):

Asma Anwar ◽

Anna B. Halpern ◽

Megan Othus ◽

Bart L. Scott ◽

Paul C. Hendrie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Early Death ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Persistent Disease ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Refractory Aml

Abstract Background: Although some adults with AML or high-risk MDS will experience long-term disease-free survival after initiation of curative-intent therapy, most patient will require therapy re-induction therapy either for primary induction failure of disease recurrence after an initial complete remission (CR) was achieved. The outcomes with standard regimens for relapsed/refractory AML are generally poor, with CR rates often not exceeding 15-20%. Data from a large single arm phase 2 study in poor-risk relapsed/refractory AML suggested tolerability and encouraging activity of a combination of G-CSF, cladribine, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (G-CLAM). Given recent data suggesting benefit of escalated doses of anthracyclines in AML, the goal of our phase 1 study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of mitoxantrone within G-CLAM in adults with relapsed/refractory AML or high-risk MDS and estimate the efficacy of this regimen. Patients and Methods: Adults ≥18 years of age with relapsed or refractory AML (APL excluded) or high-risk MDS (>10% blasts) were eligible if they had a treatment-related mortality (TRM) score of ≤6.9 (corresponding to a risk of early death with standard induction chemotherapy of ≤3%) and adequate organ function (LVEF ≥45%, creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL, bilirubin ≤2.5-times upper limit of normal). Excluded were patients with concomitant illness with expected survival <1 year and those with active, uncontrolled infection. Cohorts of 6-12 patients were assigned to 1 of 4 total dose levels of mitoxantrone (12, 14, 16, or 18 mg/m2/day on days 1-3, as compared to 10 mg/m2/day used in standard-dose G-CLAM). Other drug doses were G-CSF 300 or 480 μg/day (for weight <76 kg vs. ≥76 kg; days 0-5), cladribine 5 mg/m2/day (days 1-5), and cytarabine 2 g/m2/day (days 1-5). A second identical course of G-CLAM was given in the case of persistent disease. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: 1) any grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >48 hours that resulted in >7 day delay of the subsequent treatment cycle, with the exception of febrile neutropenia or infection; 2) any grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity, with the exception of febrile neutropenia or infection or constitutional symptoms, if recovery to grade ≤2 within 14 days. Results: 26 patients (14M, 12F), median age 57 (range: 37-77) years, median TRM score 1.73 (range: 0.29-3.92) with relapsed/refractory AML (n=23), or high-risk MDS (n=3) and cytogenetically favorable (n=2), intermediate (n=13), and adverse (n=11) disease characteristics were enrolled. One DLT occurred at dose level 1 (nausea) and 2 at dose level 4 (encephalitis and cardiogenic shock), establishing G-CLAM with mitoxantrone at 16 mg/m2/day as the MTD in our study. 2 patients (8% [95% exact confidence interval: 1-25%]) died within 28 days of treatment initiation from sepsis and cardiogenic shock, respectively. Overall, 13/26 patients (50% [30-70%]) achieved a CR (n=8) (31% [14-52%]), CRp (n=1) (4% [0-20%]), or CRi (n=4) (15% [4-35%]) with 1-2 cycles of re-induction therapy; one patient each achieved a leukemia-free state and partial remission (in a patient presenting with myeloid sarcomas); nine patients (35% [17-56%]) had persistent disease. We were unable to assess response in 2 patients due to early death (n=1) and refusal for marrow re-assessment (n=1). 7/13 responders (54%) had no evidence of residual disease by flow cytometry at best response. Among responders, median times to an absolute neutrophil count ≥500/µL and a platelet count of 50,000/µL were 33 (range: 17-51) and 31 (range: 18-54) days, respectively. Besides infections and neutropenic fever, nausea, hypoxia (fluid overload/infection-related), and maculopapular rash were the most common grade ≥3 adverse events. Conclusion G-CLAM with mitoxantrone up to 16 mg/m2/day is feasible, well tolerated, and effective in relapsed/ refractory AML/high-risk MDS. A phase 2 study based on these findings has been initiated. Disclosures Scott: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Becker:Igenica: Research Funding. Walter:Pfizer, Inc.: Consultancy; Amgen, Inc.: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Covagen AG: Consultancy; AstraZeneca, Inc.: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Updated Results of Phase 2 Study of Ruxolitinib in Combination with 5-Azacitidine in Patients with Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-120251 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 352-352 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Lucia Masarova ◽

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Naveen Pemmaraju ◽

Prithviraj Bose ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX) abrogates symptoms and organomegaly in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Combination with azacitidine (AZA) may further improve its efficacy. Methods: We initiated a single institutional, single arm, prospective, phase 2 study of RUX AZA combination in adult patients with MF and < 20% blasts. Previous therapy with RUX or AZA was not allowed. RUX 5 - 20 mg orally twice daily was given continuously since cycle 1. AZA 25 - 75 mg/m2 on days 1 - 5 of each 28-day cycle was added starting cycle 4. Responses were assessed per International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment 2013 criteria (IWG-MRT). Enrollment cut-off for this analysis was December 31st, 2017 to allow > 6 months of follow-up for all enrolled patients. We plan to present updated results with additional 5 months of enrollment at the meeting. Results: Fifty two pts were enrolled on study between 03/2013-12/2017, and were evaluable for responses. Forty seven pts (84%) were treated with both agents (RUX and AZA), with a median of 25 cycles (range, 1-55). Median age was 66 years (range, 48-87). Thirty four pts (65%) had int-2/high DIPSS score, 40 pts (77%) had spleen ≥5 cm. Thirty pts (58%) were JAK2V617F positive. Among 36 pts tested for non-driver mutations (28-gene panel); 7 pts had ASXL1, 6 had TET2, 3 had IDH1/2 and 2 had EZH2 and TP53. After a median follow-up of 22+ months (range, 1-59+); 21 pts (40%) are on therapy with a median overall follow-up of 30+ months. The most common reasons for therapy discontinuation were elective stem cell transplantation (n=12), and uncontrolled disease (n=8), including progression to acute leukemia (n=4). Four pts (8%) primarily discontinued therapy due to drug related toxicity (cytopenias). Three treatment unrelated deaths occurred on study; one each due to sepsis, meningitis and metastatic melanoma. Thirty eight pts (73%) had objective response on a study (Table). Median time to response was 1.8 months (range, 0.7-19). Seven responses (21% of responders) occurred after the addition of AZA with a median time to response of 2 months. These responses included spleen and symptom clinical improvements in 26% and 16% of pts, respectively. In total, 26 (65%), and 23 (58%) pts had palpable spleen reduction by > 50% at any time on study, and at week 24, respectively. JAK2V617F allele reduction was noted in 13 (81%) of 16 evaluable pts. Thirty one pts (60%) had available bone marrow for sequential evaluation. Nineteen pts (61%) had a documented improvement in bone marrow fibrosis, collagen or osteosclerosis, with a median time to first response of 12 months (range, 6-18). The most common grade ≥3 non-hematologic toxicity on a study was infection (34%), constipation (21%), and nausea (14%). New onset of grade ≥3 anemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 33%, 30% and 16% of pts, respectively. Conclusion: Concomitant RUX with AZA was feasible with overall IWG-MRT response rate of 73%, including >50% spleen reduction in 65% of pts. Moreover, 61% of pts achieved improvement in bone marrow fibrosis, collagen or osteosclerosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01787487. Table. Disclosures Verstovsek: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cortes:novartis: Research Funding. Pemmaraju:novartis: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding. Bose:Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Daver:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 3 Study of Pomalidomide with Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Asian Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma (RRMM) - Interim Analysis of a Trial By the Asian Myeloma Network (AMN)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139019 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1-1

Author(s):

Wee-Joo Chng ◽

Xinhua Li ◽

Cindy Lin ◽

Jin Seok Kim ◽

Hiroshi Handa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Interim Analysis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Prior Exposure ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Asian Patients ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Experienced Grade

Background Pomalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug that has been approved for the treatment of relapse refractory myeloma. A previous small randomized phase 2 study in the United States showed that combination of Pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induce a greater response rate than pomalidomide and dexamethasone1. In our prior study, AMN0012, we should that in patients with sub-optimal response to pomalidomide and dexamethasone, the addition of cyclophosphamide can increase response resulting in improvement of progression free survival. In the current study, we seek to randomize Asian patients with RRMM between PCD and PD to confirm the benefit of PCD. Method We conducted a prospective randomized trial of pomalidomide (4mg daily for 21 days followed by 7 days rest) plus dexamethasone 40mg once weekly for 4 weeks with or without cyclophosphamide (400mg once a week) in patients with relapse and refractory myeloma that has to be refractory to lenalidomide and has prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors. Each cycle is 4 weeks. Patients from Singapore, Japan and Korea (NCT03143049) were included in this Asian Myeloma Network trial. The trial was started in Sep 2017 and is still ongoing. To date, 53 patients have been recruited so far. This interim report presents data available up till the data cut-off date of 24 June 2020. Results Forty-six patients have available base line information and safety data and is included in this interim analysis. 50% of patients are male and median age of the cohort is 68 years old. 39% and 28% of patients are International Stage System (ISS) stage 2 and 3 respectively. 20% of patients have abnormal creatinine clearance. Median prior line of treatment is 3. All patients are refractory to lenalidomide and 96% have prior exposure to bortezomib. In addition, 12 patients (26%) and 5 (11%) have been treated with Carfilzomib and Ixazomib respectively. 15 (33%) patients had prior high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant. 20 (44%) patients required dose reduction of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide or dexamethasone. 89% of patients experience adverse events (AEs) of any grade. Of the 297 episodes of AEs, 43% are grade 3 or higher, with 50% of these episodes related to the study drugs. 57% of patients experienced serious AEs (SAEs) of any grade. Of the 74 episodes of SAE, 89% are grade 3 or higher, with 49% of these episodes related to the study drugs. Almost all of these events are related to cytopenias and infections. 20 (44%) of the patients develop grade 3 neutropenic fever and 9 (20%) patients have grade 3 or higher pneumonia. Only 1 patient experienced grade 3 peripheral neuropathy, 1 patient develop grade 3 pulmonary embolism, 1 patient developed grade 3 venous thromboembolism, and 1 patient experienced grade 3 renal impairment. At a median follow-up of 10.9 months, 9 of the 46 patients have died, and 21 have progressed. Three patients withdrew due to toxicity. While the overall response of the study population is not part of this interim analysis, we assessed the response of patients from the National University Cancer Institute, Singapore which has the highest number of patients recruited to get an idea of the therapeutic efficacy. Of the 14 patients recruited at NCIS, 1 patient achieved CR, 3 VGPR, 7 PR, producing a response rate of 79%. Conclusion In this interim analysis of a prospective randomized study of pomalidomide and dexamethasone with or without cyclophosphamide in Asian patients, we demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of this combination. Longer follow-up and final analysis of the study will be needed to ascertain the therapeutic advantage of PCD over PD in relapse and refractory myeloma that is refractory to lenalidomide. References 1. Baz RC, Martin TG 3rd, Lin HY, Zhao X, Shain KH, Cho HJ, Wolf JL, Mahindra A, Chari A, Sullivan DM, Nardelli LA, Lau K, Alsina M, Jagannath S. Randomized multicenter phase 2 study of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in relapsed refractory myeloma. Blood. 2016 May 26;127(21):2561-8. 2. Soekojo CY, Kim K, Huang SY, Chim CS, Takezako N, Asaoku H, Kimura H, Kosugi H, Sakamoto J, Gopalakrishnan SK, Nagarajan C, Wei Y, Moorakonda R, Lee SL, Lee JJ, Yoon SS, Kim JS, Min CK, Lee JH, Durie B,Chng WJ. 3. Pomalidomide and dexamethasone combination with additional cyclophosphamide in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (AMN001)-a trial by the Asian Myeloma Network. Blood Cancer J. 2019 Oct 8;9(10):83. Disclosures Chng: Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Phase I Study of a Liposomal Carrier (CPX-351) Containing a Synergistic, Fixed Molar Ratio of Cytarabine (Ara-C) and Daunorubicin (DNR) in Advanced Leukemias

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v112.11.2984.2984 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 2984-2984 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Eric J. Feldman ◽

Jeffrey Lancet ◽

Jonathan E. Kolitz ◽

Ellen Ritchie ◽

Alan F. List ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Molar Ratio ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Refractory Aml

Abstract Background: CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation of Ara-C and DNR which fixes the synergistic 5:1 molar ratio found to enhance efficacy in both in vitro and in vivo preclinical leukemia models. CPX-351 overcomes the pharmacokinetic (PK) differences of each drug, enabling the maintenance of the 5:1 molar ratio for extended periods of time after IV administration and the delivery of this ratio to bone marrow. Preclinical data from in vitro models show that CPX-351 is actively internalized by leukemic cells within vacuoles and subsequently releases DNR intracellularly. A Phase I study was performed with CPX-351 in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Objectives: to determine safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a 90 min IV infusion of CPX-351 given on days 1, 3, 5 to patients with advanced leukemia and MDS, and to seek preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory AML/ALL and MDS were eligible. A second induction course was permitted if the day 14 bone marrow showed evidence of antileukemic effect and persistent leukemia. Dosing started at 3 units/m2 (1 u = 1 mg Ara-C and 0.44 mg DNR) using single patient cohorts and dose doublings. Three patient cohorts and 33% dose increments began after evidence of antileukemic activity and continued until limiting toxicities (DLTs) completed dose escalation. PK samples were collected after each dose. Results: Forty-seven subjects received 69 courses of CPX-351: Male/Female = 31/16, median age = 62 years (range 23–81); 44 patients had AML and 3 patients had ALL; median number of prior regimens = 2 (1–7). Thirty-seven patients entered the escalation phase of the study and ten subjects, most in first relapse, were treated after completion of dose escalation to confirm safety. At 24 u/m2 antileukemic effects were observed leading to increased cohort size to 3 and decreased escalation rate to 33%. The MTD and recommended Phase 2 dose was 101 u (101 mg Ara-C + 44 mg DNR)/m2 after observing 3 DLTs (decreased LVEF, hypertensive crisis, prolonged aplasia) at 134 u/m2. Adverse events data are available for 36 of 37 patients from the escalation phase of the study. Nonhematologic grade 3–5 toxicities occurring in more than one patient included: infections (58%), dyspnea (11%), fever (11%), hypophosphatemia (8%), hypokalemia (6%), renal failure (6%), skin rash (6%), headache (6%) hyperglycemia (6%) hypoxia (6%) and respiratory failure (6%). Mucositis of any grade was observed in 42% of patients with 3% having grade 3 mucositis. Diarrhea of grade 1 and 2 severity occurred in 39% of patients. Interim analysis of PK data demonstrates maintenance of the 5:1 molar ratio and detectable encapsulated drug persisting up to 24 hours. The average half-lives were 35 hr for total Ara-C and 23 hr for DNR, significantly longer than reported for the conventional drugs. Overall, 11 patients achieved CR/CRp. Among the 19 patients treated at the MTD, 5 of the 13 patients evaluable for response achieved CR. Six patients were treated above the MTD (134 u/m2) and 2 achieved CR. Median time to CR was 43 days. Conclusions: The recommended phase 2 dose is 101 u/m2. CPX-351 was well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities noted up to the MTD. GI toxicities and mucositis were transient and nearly always of mild to moderate severity. Reduced LV function was observed in two patients both with substantial prior anthracycline exposure. CRs were observed in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory AML. Future plans include a randomized Phase 2 study comparing CPX-351 versus Cytarabine + Daunorubicin (“7 + 3”) in older (>60 yo) subjects with previously untreated AML, and a phase 2 study in patients with AML in 1st relapse.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Retreatment with Bortezomib in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results From RETRIEVE, a Prospective International Phase 2 Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3866.3866 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3866-3866 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽

Igor W. Blau ◽

Paolo Corradini ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Johannes Drach ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bortezomib Treatment ◽

Best Response ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3866 Poster Board III-802 Bortezomib (Velcade®) retreatment has been shown to be active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) in a number of retrospective studies and a small prospective phase 4 study (EVEREST). This large, prospective, international, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study was conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety of retreatment with bortezomib in MM patients who had previously responded (at least partial response [PR]) to bortezomib-based therapy as their most recent prior treatment. Patients had to have previously tolerated bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2 alone or in combination and have had a treatment-free interval (TFI; time from last dose of initial bortezomib treatment to first dose of bortezomib retreatment) of ≥6 months. Additional eligibility criteria included progressive disease or relapse from complete response (CR) by EBMT criteria, no MM therapy (except maintenance with dexamethasone, thalidomide, or interferon) since the last dose of initial bortezomib treatment, KPS ≥60, and adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function; patients with grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain (as defined by NCI CTCAE v3.0) were excluded. Patients received bortezomib at the last tolerated dose (1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2) during initial treatment on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for up to eight 21-day cycles, either alone or in combination with dexamethasone at the investigator's discretion. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria every 6 weeks during treatment and then every 2 months until disease progression. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCI CTCAE v3.0. A total of 130 patients received at least 1 dose of bortezomib retreatment and were included in the safety population. Patients had a median age of 67 years, 57% were male, and 16% had KPS '70%. Median time from diagnosis of MM was 4.5 years (range 0–14 years); median number of prior therapies was 2; 15, 80, 23, and 12 patients had received 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 prior lines of therapy (excluding initial bortezomib therapy). Best response by EBMT criteria to initial bortezomib treatment was CR in 26% and PR in 74% of patients; median time to progression and TFI after initial bortezomib treatment were 17.9 months and 14.3 months, respectively. Last tolerated dose of previous bortezomib therapy was 1.3 mg/m2 and 1.0 mg/m2 for 62% and 29% of patients, respectively; 9% received another dose. Patients received a median 7.0 (range 1–8) cycles of bortezomib retreatment (23% of patients completed all 8 cycles); 72% of patients received concomitant dexamethasone. A total of 126 patients were evaluable for response. In the 126 response-evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR; CR+PR) by best confirmed response (EBMT criteria) was 40%; in addition, 18% of patients achieved minimal response (MR), to give a CR+PR+MR rate of 58%. After a planned secondary efficacy analysis, the ORR (CR+PR) by single best response was 55% (75% ≥MR). Median time to best confirmed response (≥MR) was 2.9 months; time to first response was 1.5 months. Analysis of ORR by patient subgroups showed comparable results in patients who did versus did not receive concomitant dexamethasone (42% vs 32%), in those who received ≤1.0 mg/m2 vs 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib (35% vs 41%), and in those aged ≤65 years vs >65 years (45% vs 36%). ORR was 67%, 39%, 33%, and 25% in patients who had received 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 prior lines of therapy (excluding initial bortezomib), respectively. Analysis of best confirmed responses according to response to initial bortezomib showed that 63% and 52% of patients who achieved a CR or PR, respectively, to initial bortezomib treatment responded to retreatment. Most (98%) patients experienced a treatment-emergent AE; 60% experienced a grade 3/4 AE, and 32% experienced a serious AE; there were 8 deaths, 2 of which (due to sepsis and stroke) were possibly treatment-related. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (35%), neutropenia (7%), diarrhea (7%), and pneumonia (5%). AEs leading to dose reductions or discontinuations were reported for 22% and 12% of patients, respectively. The incidence of neuropathy was 39%, including 9% grade 3; 4% of patients discontinued treatment due to PN; 61% of neuropathy events resolved or improved within a median 1.3 months. These results confirm that bortezomib retreatment is a well-tolerated, feasible, and active therapeutic option for heavily pretreated MM patients without evidence of cumulative toxicity. Disclosures: Petrucci: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Drach:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Blade:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Johnson and Johnson: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Multinational, Open-Label Phase 2 Study Of Ruxolitinib In Asian Patients (Pts) With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post–Polycythemia Vera MF (PPV-MF), Or Post–Essential Thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4086.4086 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4086-4086

Author(s):

Chul Won Jung ◽

Lee-Yung Shih ◽

Zhijian Xiao ◽

Jie Jin ◽

Hsin-An Hou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Spleen Volume ◽

Open Label ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Open Label Phase ◽

Large Phase ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor that has demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly, improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life (QoL), and prolonged survival in 2 phase 3 studies comparing ruxolitinib with placebo (COMFORT-I) and best available therapy (COMFORT-II). However, no clinical trial in pts with MF had been conducted in Asian countries, and only a limited number of Asian pts or healthy volunteers had been enrolled in any ruxolitinib study. Methods This study was an open-label phase 2 study evaluating ruxolitinib in Asian pts with PMF, PPV-MF, or PET-MF who had palpable splenomegaly ≥ 5 cm below the costal margin and intermediate-2– or high-risk MF by the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria. Pts received starting doses of ruxolitinib 15 or 20 mg twice daily (bid) based on baseline platelet count (100-200 or > 200 × 109/L, respectively); dose adjustments balancing safety and efficacy were allowed to titrate each pt to their most appropriate dose. The primary endpoint was met if the proportion of pts achieving ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline at week 24 was ≥ 27.5% as measured by MRI/CT. Symptomatic response was assessed as a secondary endpoint using the 7-day modified MF Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0 total symptom score (TSS) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The study was conducted in China (n = 63), Japan (n = 30), Korea (n = 17), and Taiwan (n = 10). The data cutoff date for this analysis was 7 June 2013. Results Overall, 120 pts were enrolled (PMF, n = 80; PPV-MF, n = 21; PET-MF, n = 19), and their baseline characteristics were as follows: median age, 61 years (range, 25-80 years); 51.7% female; 69.2% intermediate-2 and 30.8% high risk by IWG-MRT criteria; median palpable spleen size, 15 cm (range, 5-45 cm); median spleen volume, 2159 cm3; 55.8% of pts had prior exposure to hydroxyurea. The median follow-up was 8.44 months; 22.5% of pts discontinued treatment, primarily for adverse events (AEs; 9.2%) and disease progression (7.5%). The median duration of treatment was 8.44 months (range, 0.5-21.7 months), and the median daily dose was 20.64 mg/day in the 15 mg bid group (n = 46) and 36.11 mg/day in the 20 mg bid group (n = 74). All pts were evaluable for achievement of the primary endpoint, 101 pts remained on study and were evaluable at week 24, and 96 pts had nonzero scores on the MFSAF-TSS and were evaluable for a reduction from baseline. Most pts who had assessments at week 24 (91% [92/101]) had a reduction from baseline in spleen volume (Figure). The study met the primary endpoint, with 31.7% (38/120) of all pts achieving ≥ 35% reduction from baseline at week 24. Overall, 38.3% (46/120) of pts achieved ≥ 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at any time on study. As measured by the 7-day MFSAF, 49% (47/96) of pts achieved ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in TSS (median reduction, 47.2%). Pts experienced an improvement from baseline at week 24 in EORTC global health status/QoL (mean change, 5.2). The most common nonhematologic AEs (≥ 10%) regardless of relationship to study medication included diarrhea (25.8%), upper respiratory tract infection (17.5%), ALT level increased (15.0%), pyrexia (15.0%), AST level increased (13.3%), cough (11.7%), herpes zoster infection (11.7%), nasopharyngitis (10.8%), constipation (10.0%), gamma-glutamyl transferase level increased (10.0%), and headache (10.0%), and most were grade 1/2. Serious AEs were reported for 24.2% of pts, and 65.8% of all pts had grade 3/4 AEs. The most common new or worsening laboratory abnormalities were low hemoglobin (all grade 3, 55.7%), low lymphocyte (grade 3/4, 19.5%), low platelet (grade 3/4, 15.3%), and low ANC (grade 3/4, 7.6%) levels. AEs observed in this study were consistent with those observed in the 2 large phase 3 COMFORT studies. Six pts (5%) died on treatment or within 30 days of discontinuation. Summary/conclusions Findings from this study demonstrated that ruxolitinib was relatively well tolerated in Asian pts with MF and provided substantial reductions in splenomegaly and modest improvements in MF-associated symptoms. The AEs observed with ruxolitinib treatment in this study are consistent with those observed in the large phase 3 COMFORT studies, and there were no new AEs associated with ruxolitinib in Asian pts with MF. Disclosures: Okamoto: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sirulnik:Novartis: Employment. Ruiz:Novartis: Employment. Amagasaki:Novartis: Employment. Ito:Novartis: Employment. Akashi:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

An Open-Label Phase 2 Study Of Ofatumumab In Combination With a Novel AKT Inhibitor (Afuresertib) In Previously Treated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4175.4175 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4175-4175

Author(s):

Christine I. Chen ◽

Susi Snitzler ◽

Trina Wang ◽

Harminder Paul ◽

Lisa W Le ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Treatment Phase ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Akt Inhibitor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Ofatumumab is a novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody which led to impressive single-agent responses of 47-58% in a phase 2 study of CLL patients (pts) with refractory disease (Wierda et al 2010). Unfortunately, response durations were short (median 5.6-7.1 mos). In order to improve upon these results, we combined ofatumumab with a novel pan-AKT kinase inhibitor, afuresertib (GSK2110183). The AKT pathway plays a centralized role in tumor differentiation, migration, proliferation and survival and is frequently aberrantly activated in CLL (Longo et al 2007). Single agent afuresertib is very well-tolerated with minimal myelotoxicity in relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies (Spencer et al ASH 2011). We present an interim analysis of the initial 19 of 31 planned pts in an ongoing trial of ofatumumab and afuresertib in relapsed/refractory CLL. Methods Previously treated CLL pts who have received at least one prior fludarabine-containing regimen with disease progression are eligible. During the initial 6 month Treatment Phase, ofatumumab 2000mg IV is administered weekly for 8 doses, then once every 4 week cycle for 4 doses (dose/schedule identical to the pivotal phase 2 trial) with afuresertib 125mg orally daily. An initial 10 day Lead-in Phase with afuresertib alone allows for evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD) changes in phosphoproteins and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. Pts are assessed for safety and response on day 1 of each cycle. Pts achieving SD, PR or CR by the end of the Treatment Phase proceed to the Maintenance Phase with single-agent afuresertib for a maximum of 12 mos (12 cycles). Results Demographics: To date, 19 pts have been enrolled. Median age is 65 yrs (range 43-76), baseline median Hb 108g/L (range 80-145), absolute lymphocytes 29.7 x109/L (range 1.0-464.9), β2M 4.42mg/L (range 1.42-3.21), bulky nodes ≥5cm in 5 pts (32%), organomegaly in 8 pts (42%), del17p/del11q on FISH in 9 pts (47%), and ZAP70+ in 13 pts (68%). Eight pts (42%) were fludarabine-refractory; only 2 pts had received prior alemtuzumab. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-6). Toxicity: Hematologic: 4 pts (21%) developed Gr 3-4 neutropenia during at least 1 cycle; 1 pt (5%) had a febrile neutropenia event. Only 2 pts (10.5%) have developed Gr 3-4 thrombocytopenia, without bleeding. Nonhematologic toxicity: Most common related grade 3-4 toxicities were GI: dyspepsia (53%), diarrhea (37%), nausea (21%), temporally related to oral afuresertib and easily managed symptomatically. Infusion reactions to ofatumumab were frequent (12 pts; 63%) with grade 3 reactions in 3 pts. Five pts (26%) developed non-infectious pneumonitis, with 3 pts requiring hospitalization. Two pts with preexisting atrial arrhythmias sustained exacerbation with weekly ofatumumab infusions. Most infections were mild, with only 1 grade 3 cellulitis. Efficacy: Of the 19 response-evaluable pts receiving a median of 6 cycles (range 1-9), 8 pts (42%) have achieved a PR, 11 SD (58%), and no CR. Response onset was rapid at a median 0.9 mos (range 0.8-2.8). At a median follow-up of 6.8 mos (range 0.3-12.9 mos), 5 pts (26%) have progressed and one patient has died after cycle 1 on therapy due to progressive CLL. PD Studies: CD19+ cells are assayed for phosphorylated AKT and its downstream targets RAS40 and GSK3 in addition to phospho-proteins of alternative pathways including ERK and pS6 by multiplexed phospho-flow cytometry. Peripheral blood samples are collected at screening and on cycle 1 day 10, after dosing with afuresertib. Of the 7 patients evaluated thus far, 5 demonstrated constitutive AKT phosphorylation at baseline. Partial inhibition of AKT signaling evidenced by increased phosphorylation of AKT and inhibition of GSK3 and/or RAS40 phosphorylation in response to BCR stimulation was observed post-treatment, indicating target engagement by afuresertib. PK Studies: Afuresertib exposure (Cmax and AUC) was similar when afuresertib was administered alone or in combination with ofatumumab. Conclusion Preliminary results from this phase 2 study suggests that a combination of ofatumumab plus a novel oral AKT inhibitor, afuresertib, has activity in previously treated CLL and is generally well-tolerated with minimal myelotoxicity. Response data are encouraging but whether durable responses can be achieved requires more mature follow-up. Disclosures: Chen: Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Off-label use of ofatumumab and afuresertib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL. Smith:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. Johnston:Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text