A Randomised 1 Year Study Evaluating the Impact of Vitamin C Supplementation on Systemic Iron Parameters of Iron Overload in Thalassemia Major Patients on Long-Term Treatment with Deferasirox

Abstract Background Ascorbic acid (AA) supplementation has traditionally been used in iron overloaded patients as means to increase iron chelation efficacy and replenish AA oxidized by labile iron found in those patients. The rationale leaned on AA's ability to render stored iron accessible to chelation, as found in urinary iron excretion following deferoxamine infusion. However, as AA increases labile iron redox-cycling and ensuing toxicity, we set to assess the long term benefits versus toxicity risks of the combined chelator-AA treatment. Objectives Perform a prospective, open-label, randomized and controlled 1 year study on thalassemia patients treated with deferasirox (DFX) in order to assess the effects of AA supplementation on: a. markers of systemic iron overload in selected organs and in plasma and b. markers of plasma labile iron (LPI) as potential contributors to oxidative stress toxicity. Patients and Methods Enrolment: 22 beta thalassemia major (TM) patients ≥10 years treated >2 years with DFX. Exclusion: cardiac dysfunction/arrhythmia or mT2* MRI <6 ms. Study: patients previously unexposed to AA received once-daily DFX (up to 40 mg/kg/d) with or without 125 mg AA for 1 year. All parameters were measured at baseline (BL); serum ferritin (SF) monthly, liver iron (LIC by MRI) and cardiac iron (mT2*MRI) after 1y. e-LPI (surrogate NTBI marker) and LPI (plasma redox-active labile iron marker) were assessed at BL, mo 1 & 6 by FeROS™ (Aferrix, Ltd) and fasting plasma AA at BL and EOS (fluorimetrically). Blood samples were withdrawn on the morning of transfusion day, 24 hours after last DFX (+/- AA) administration. Safety was followed using laboratory and clinical tests. AA levels were also determined in 23 healthy individuals (age and gender matched). Results 22 TM patients were enrolled (mean age 23.5, range 10-34 y). The average dose ± SD of DFX given to all 22 patients was 38±4.5 mg/kg/d. 11 patients were randomised to receive DFX and the others with DFX supplemented with 125 mg AA (mean 2.4±0.5, range 1.9-4.2 mg/kg) for 1 year. At BL, the AA levels were significantly lower in the TM group compared to controls (2.44 ± 3.38 vs 9.60± 4.36 mg/dl respectively, p<0.000001). 11 of 22 patients had AA levels >-2SD of control group whereas the other 11 patients showed normal ranges of AA. The AA deficient patients were those that showed significantly higher SF, LIC and lower mT2* at BL (Table 1). In the DFX+AA arm, 5/11 (45%) patients had subnormal AA levels at BL but attained normal status after 1 year, as did all others on AA. Of the 5/11 (45%) DFX-treated patients that did not receive AA had normal BL AA and only 2/11 maintained normal AA status at EOS. A significant correlation was obtained between BL SF, LIC and mT2* and e-LPI (r 0.49, p 0.025; r 0.57, p 0.01; r -0.43, p 0.057 respectively) but not with LPI. The changes associated with DFX alone or with AA from BL to EOS were subtle for all parameters measured (Table 2). Importantly, eLPI and LPI remained at basal levels throughout 6 months treatment in both arms. With DFX alone, LPI were 0.34±0.30 units (mM iron) (BL) & 0.63±0.58 (6 mo); eLPI: 1.71±1.93 at BL & 2.48±3.11 (6 mo). DFX+AA: LPI were 0.33±0.46 (BL) & 0.35±0.44 (6 mo); eLPI: 2.13±1.71 (BL) & 1.78±1.51 (6 mo). Conclusions TM patients on long term DFX without AA supplementation showed subnormal, AA levels. This was most pronounced in TM patients with higher liver and heart iron. The addition of AA to DFX normalized the AA levels but did not increase the e-LPI and LPI during 6 mo, indicating no apparent risk of iatrogenic toxicity by AA to DFX. Moreover, AA may enhance the efficacy of DFX in cardiac and hepatic iron. The small rise in SF versus fall in LIC in the DFX+AA arm might need further exploration. Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients based on AA status Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients based on AA status Table 2 Changes in iron overload markers in patients treated with DFX or DFX+AA over 1 year Table 2. Changes in iron overload markers in patients treated with DFX or DFX+AA over 1 year Disclosures Aydinok: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Cerus: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding. Cabantchik:Aferrix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hinoman: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmeceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apopharma: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Impact Of Liver Iron Overload On Myocardial T2* Response In Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia Major Patients Treated With Deferasirox For Up To 3 Years

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1016.1016 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1016-1016 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

John Porter ◽

Ali T Taher ◽

Yesim Aydinok ◽

Maria D Cappellini ◽

Antonis Kattamis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Iron Overload ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Iron Removal ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Liver Iron ◽

Cardiac Iron ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Liver Iron Overload ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Patients with myocardial iron overload require effective cardiac iron removal to minimize the risk of cardiac complications. The 3 year EPIC cardiac sub-study showed that the oral iron chelator, deferasirox (DFX), effectively reduced cardiac iron overload. Previous reports demonstrate that cardiac iron removal is slow and suggest that liver iron concentration (LIC) may affect cardiac iron removal rate by chelators (Pennell et al., 2012; Blood). The objective of these analyses was to evaluate the impact of the severity of the liver iron overload on the change in myocardial T2* (mT2*) for patients receiving up to 3 years of DFX treatment in the EPIC sub-study. Methods Inclusion and exclusion criteria have been described previously (Pennell et al., 2012; Haematologica). Patients were categorized into LIC ≤15 and >15 mg Fe/g dry weight (hereafter mg/g) at baseline (BL) and by LIC <7, 7–≤15 and >15 mg/g at 12, 24, and 36 months to assess the impact of BL LIC and changes in LIC overtime on mT2*, respectively. During study, LIC and mT2* were measured every 6 months. Efficacy was assessed in per-protocol population that entered third year extension. Here, mT2* is presented as the geometric mean (Gmean) ± coefficient of variation (CV) unless otherwise specified. Statistical significance was established at α-level of 0.05 using a 2-sided paired t-test for within group comparisons and ANOVA for multiple group comparisons. All p-values were of exploratory nature for this post-hoc analysis. Results Of the 71 patients, who continued into study year 3, 68 patients considered evaluable were included in this analysis (per protocol population); 59 patients had LIC values available at end of study (EOS). Mean age was 20.5 ±7.35 years and 61.8 % of patients were female. Mean actual dose of DFX (mg/kg/day) was 32.1 ±5.5 and 35.1 ±4.9 in patients with BL LIC ≤15 and >15 mg/g, respectively. At EOS, mean actual doses were 32.9 ±5.4 (LIC <7 mg/g), 38.0 ±3.4 (LIC 7–≤15 mg/g), and 37.6 ±3.1 (LIC >15 mg/g). Overall, patients had high BL LIC (Mean, 29.0 ±10.0 mg/g); 61 patients had LIC >15 (30.8 ±8.8) mg/g, only 7 patients had LIC ≤15 (12.7 ±1.1) mg/g, and no patients had LIC <7 mg/g. After 36 months, a significant mean decrease from BL in LIC of -7.6 ±4.6 mg/g (p = 0.0049) and -16.8 ±14.0 mg/g (p <0.001) was observed in patients with LIC ≤15 and >15 mg/g, respectively. Notably, 51.9% of patients with BL LIC >15 mg/g achieved EOS LIC <7 mg/g. Overall, mean mT2* was 12.8 ±4.6 ms. The impact of BL LIC on mT2* and LIC response was as follows: in patients with LIC ≤15 mg/g (Mean BL mT2*, 14.2 ±3.6 ms) and >15 mg/g (BL mT2*, 12.7 ±4.7 ms), mT2* increased by 52% (Mean abs. change, 7.5 ±4.1 ms, p=0.0016) and 46% (7.3 ±7.3 ms, p<0.001), respectively. Patients with BL LIC ≤15 normalized mT2* in 24 months (Mean, 20.0 ±6.0 ms) versus 36 months for patients with BL LIC >15 mg/g, (20.1 ±10.6 ms) displaying a lag of nearly 12 months. The relation between post-BL LIC on mT2* response at 12, 24 and 36 months is shown in the figure. At 12 months, there was no significant difference in mT2* that had occurred in patients with LIC <7 mg/g (24% increase; mean abs. change, 3.5 ±2.3 ms), LIC 7–≤15 mg/g (19% increase; 3.4 ±5.2 ms) and those with LIC >15 mg/g (13% increase; 1.9 ±3.2 ms). However, at 24 months, there was a statistically significant difference amongst the 3 subgroups in percent increase in the mT2* that had occurred; patients with LIC <7, LIC 7-≤15 and LIC >15 mg/g had 54% (Mean abs. change, 8.3 ±7.3 ms), 33% (5.2 ±5.2 ms) and 10% (2.1 ±4.3 ms) increase (p <0.001), respectively. Similarly, at 36 months, the mT2* had increased by 71% (Mean abs. change, 10.3 ±6.6 ms) in the LIC <7 mg/g group; a 31% increase (5.3 ±5.0 ms) had occurred in the LIC 7– ≤15 mg/g group; and an 18% (3.3 ±6.0 ms) increase (p <0.001) had occurred in the LIC >15mg/g group. At all-time points, in patients who achieved an LIC <7 mg/g, a statistically significant increase in T2* from BL had occurred. Discussion Overall, DFX treatment resulted in a significant decrease in LIC and improved mT2*. A greater difference in mT2* improvement was shown to have occurred in patients who achieved lower end-of-year LIC after treated with DFX. This divergence was progressive with time, being maximal at 36 months. Thus, a therapeutic response in LIC with DFX is associated with a greater likelihood of improving mT2*. This may assist in monitoring liver and cardiac response to DFX. Prospective evaluation of this relationship is indicated. Disclosures: Porter: Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy. Taher:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Aydinok:Novartis Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cappellini:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kattamis:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ApoPharma: Speakers Bureau. El-Ali:Novartis Pharma: Employment. Martin:Novartis Pharma: Employment. Pennell:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ApoPharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) Vs Imatinib (IM) In Patients (pts) With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and The Impact Of Early Molecular Response (EMR) and Sokal Risk At Diagnosis On Long-Term Outcomes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.92.92 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 92-92 ◽

Cited By ~ 27

Author(s):

Giuseppe Saglio ◽

Andreas Hochhaus ◽

Timothy P. Hughes ◽

Richard E. Clark ◽

Hirohisa Nakamae ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Eligibility Criterion ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Vascular Events ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact

Abstract Introduction Frontline NIL continues to show benefit over IM in pts with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) CML-CP, with higher rates of major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABLIS ≤ 0.1%) and MR4.5 (BCR-ABLIS ≤ 0.0032%), lower rates of progression to accelerated phase (AP)/blast crisis (BC) and fewer new BCR-ABL mutations on treatment in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials–Newly Diagnosed Pts (ENESTnd) trial. Here, we report data with a minimum follow-up (f/u) of 4 y; updated data based on 5 y of f/u will be presented. Methods Adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP (N = 846) were randomized to NIL 300 mg twice daily (BID; n = 282), NIL 400 mg BID (n = 281), or IM 400 mg once daily (QD; n = 283). Progression and overall survival (OS) events were collected prospectively during study f/u, including after discontinuation of study treatment. Efficacy in the NIL 300 mg BID and IM arms was evaluated based on achievement of EMR (BCR-ABLIS ≤ 10% at 3 mo). Results At 4 y, ≥ 87% of pts remained on study in each arm and 57%-69% remained on core treatment (Table). Rates of MMR and MR4.5 by 4 y were significantly higher with NIL vs IM. Significantly fewer pts progressed to AP/BC on NIL vs IM (on core treatment: 0.7%, 1.1%, and 4.2%; on study: 3.2%, 2.1%, and 6.7% [NIL 300 mg BID, NIL 400 mg BID, and IM arms, respectively]). Of 17 pts across the 3 arms who progressed on core treatment, 11 (65%) had never achieved complete cytogenetic response and none had achieved MR4.5. Fewer mutations have emerged in the NIL arms vs the IM arm; in y 4, mutations emerged in 2 pts (1 pt with T315I on NIL 300 mg BID; 1 pt with F317L on IM). More pts achieved EMR in the NIL 300 mg BID arm vs the IM arm (91% vs 67%). Pts with EMR had significantly higher rates of progression-free survival (PFS) and OS at 4 y vs pts with BCR-ABL > 10% at 3 mo. Among pts with BCR-ABL > 10% at 3 mo, more progressions to AP/BC occurred in the IM arm (n = 14) vs the NIL 300 mg BID arm (n = 2); half of these pts progressed between 3 and 6 mo. In pts with intermediate or high Sokal risk, PFS and OS at 4 y were higher in both NIL arms vs the IM arm. No new safety signals were detected. Selected cardiac and vascular events were more common on NIL vs IM (by 4 y, peripheral arterial occlusive disease [PAOD] in 4 [1.4%], 5 [1.8%], and 0 pts; ischemic heart disease [IHD] in 11 [3.9%], 14 [5.1%,] and 3 [1.1%] pts; and ischemic cerebrovascular events in 3 [1.1%], 5 [1.8%], and 1 [0.4%] pts in the NIL 300 mg BID, NIL 400 mg BID, and IM arms, respectively). In the NIL 300 mg BID arm, 2 of 11 IHD events occurred between 3 and 4 y (all 4 PAOD events occurred in the first 2 y). In the NIL 400 mg BID arm, 2 of 5 PAOD events and 3 of 14 IHD events occurred between 3 and 4 y. Most pts (7 of 9) with a PAOD event on NIL were at high risk due to a combination of baseline risk factors. Conclusions NIL, a standard-of-care frontline therapy option for newly diagnosed CML-CP pts, affords superior efficacy compared with IM, including higher rates of EMR (which is associated with improved long-term outcomes), higher rates of MR4.5 (a key eligibility criterion for many studies of treatment-free remission), and a lower risk of disease progression. NIL continues to show good tolerability with long-term f/u. While selected cardiac and vascular events (including PAOD) are slightly more frequent on NIL vs IM, no increase in annual incidence of these events over time has been observed. Disclosures: Saglio: ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hochhaus:Ariad: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hughes:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL: Research Funding. Clark:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Nakamae:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, travel/ accomodations/ meeting expenses Other. Kim:BMS, Novartis,IL-Yang: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Etienne:Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flinn:Novartis: Research Funding. Lipton:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Moiraghi:Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Fan:Novartis: Employment. Menssen:Novartis: Employment. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Larson:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Predictive Factors of Response and Survival of Lenalidomide and Rituximab As Initial Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129311 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1533-1533 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Paolo Strati ◽

Ralph J. Johnson ◽

Sheryl G Forbes ◽

Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽

Felipe Samaniego ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Initial Treatment ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Long Term Follow Up ◽

Baseline Characteristics

Introduction. The combination of rituximab and lenalidomide (R2) is active in patients with untreated indolent lymphoma. Recent randomized trials (RELEVANCE) have demonstrated similar efficacy when compared to standard chemo-immunotherapy backbones. Long term follow up of patients receiving R2 as well as predictors of long term remission and survival have yet to be published. Methods. We prospectively evaluated patients with low grade advanced stage FL who received R2 as initial treatment at our institution between 07/2008 and 10/2014. Lenalidomide was given at 20 mg (day 1-21, in a 28 day cycle) for 6 cycles with rituximab monthly. Lenalidomide starting dose was 10 mg if baseline creatinine clearance was < 60 mL/min. Patients with an objective response continued with 10-20 mg of lenalidomide with rituximab for up to 12 more cycles. Response was evaluated according to 2014 Lugano criteria. Results. One-hundred and one patients were included in the analysis, baseline characteristics are shown in the Table. Median number of provided cycles was 7 (range, 1-20). Median dose of lenalidomide was 20 mg (range, 5-20 mg), and 29 (29%) patients required a dose reduction. Fifty-six (55%) patients experienced grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities, the most common (> 5%) being neutropenia (39%), skin rash (20%), myalgia (16%) and fatigue (16%). Seven (7%) patients discontinued treatment before completion, after a median time of 4 months (range, 1-10 months): 4 because of toxicity (arterial thrombosis in 2, respiratory failure in 1, and skin rash in 1), and 3 because of progression. Ninety-eight patients were evaluable for response, while 3 patients discontinued treatment because of toxicity before first response assessment. Overall response rate was 98%, CR rate 90% (both achieved after a median of 6 months [range, 3-22 months]), and CR rate at 30 months (CR30) was 80%. Only female sex associated with a higher CR rate (96% vs 83%, p=0.05), while no baseline characteristic associated with CR30 rate. After a median follow-up of 88 months (95% confidence interval, 84-92 months), 31 (31%) patients progressed and/or died, 7-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 63%, and 13% of patients had a PFS < 24 months (PFS24). Failure to achieve CR was the only factor associated with significantly decreased PFS (10 months vs not reached, p<0.001) and higher likelihood of PFS24 (46% vs 5%, p<0.001). No association was observed with baseline characteristics, including FLIPI and FLIPI-2 score. At most recent follow-up, transformation was reported in 3 (3%) patients, after 30, 32 and 42 months, respectively. Two (2%) patients have died, 1 of unrelated comorbid health conditions, 1 of progressive disease, and 7-year overall survival was 98%. Second cancers (excluding transformation) were diagnosed in 8 (8%) patients, after a median of 55 months (range, 3-105 months). These included: breast adenocarcinoma (2), melanoma (2), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (1), esophageal adenocarcinoma (1), and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia. Discussion. Long-term follow-up show very favorable outcomes for patients with advanced stage FL receiving R2 as initial treatment, independent of traditional prognostic factors relevant to patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy, including FLIPI and FLIPI-2 score. Combination strategies, aimed at increasing depth of response to R2, may further improve outcomes observed with this regimen. Table. Disclosures Nastoupil: Bayer: Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria. Westin:Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; 47 Inc: Research Funding; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Wang:AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MoreHealth: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioInvent: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aviara: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; VelosBio: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding. Neelapu:Pfizer: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allogene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fowler:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: lenalidomide and rituximab are not yet FDA-approved as frontline treatment for patients with FL

Download Full-text

The Impact of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (alloHCT) on the Outcome of Poor-Risk Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): A Retrospective Intent-to-Transplant (ITT) Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128352 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3328-3328 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Lorenz Selberg ◽

Peter Stadtherr ◽

Sascha Dietrich ◽

Thomas Luft ◽

Andrea Bondong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

T Cell Lymphoma ◽

The Other ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Unrelated Donors ◽

The Impact

Although alloHCT is an accepted salvage treatment in defined settings of poor-risk NHL, its potential benefit in these indications remains controversial because virtually all published studies are uncontrolled and restricted to patients who were actually able to undergo transplantation. Here, we aimed at assessing the impact of alloHCT by measuring its outcome from the time of donor search indication rather than from the time of transplant, thereby taking into account those patients who fail to proceed to allografting for any reason. Study design and patients : In a single centre retrospective analysis, course and outcome of all patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) who were considered as having an alloHCT indication according to accepted guidelines between 2004 and 2018 were recorded. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from start of donor search. A key secondary endpoint was comparison of OS from the 3-month landmark by donor availability. Accepted donors were matched related donors (MRD), 10/10 matched unrelated donors (MUD), 9/10 compatible unrelated donors (MMUD), and mismatched related donors (MMRD), with haplo donors being used at our institution only since 2014. Results : Altogether a donor search was initiated in 187 patients (DLBCL 32%, FL 17%, MCL 23%, PTCL 28%). Median age was 54 (19-69) years with 74% being male. Within a median time from diagnosis to search initiation of 1.1 (0.1-19) years, a median of 4 (1-9) treatment lines had been administered, including an autoHCT in 50%. 69% of the patients had active disease at the time of search initiation. Only 2 patients underwent donor search in 1st remission (for Richter transformation and hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma, respectively). With a median follow-up of 6.2 (0.6-15.9) years, OS at 5 years after search initiation for DLBCL, FL, MCL, and PTCL was 25%, 44%, 52%, and 50%, respectively (Fig 1). 171 patients (91%) were alive at the 3-month landmark. For these, an MRD (20%), MUD (44%), MMUD (25%), or MMRD (7%) could be identified in 96% of the cases. AlloHCT was performed in 72% of all 187 patients, and in 79% of the patients alive at the 3-month landmark, with a significantly lower rate in DLBCL (69%) compared to the other entities. In patients who were actually transplanted, 5-year OS from landmark for DLBCL, FL, MCL and PTCL was 32%, 63%, 62%, and 62%, respectively, whereas only 5 of the 36 patients (14%) alive at the 3-month landmark not undergoing alloHCT for any reason survived long term. Due to the low rate of unsuccessful searches, donor vs no-donor landmark survival analyses were not possible. Conclusions: Despite donor search now being successful in virtually all cases, 20-30% of those patients intended for alloHCT for NHL will never proceed to transplant. However, long-term OS by ITT does not seem substantially worse than alloHCT outcome observed in registry studies restricted to patients actually transplanted, with DLBCL appearing inferior to the other 3 entities. Patients surviving the 3-month landmark but not undergoing alloHCT for any reason have a poor outlook. These results may serve as benchmark for novel therapeutic options entering the NHL treatment landscape. Disclosures Luft: Neovii: Research Funding; JAZZ: Research Funding. Schmitt:MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Sponsoring of Symposia; Therakos Mallinckrodt: Other: Financial Support. Dreger:Neovii, Riemser: Research Funding; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Sponsoring of Symposia; AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis, Riemser, Roche: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Riemser, Roche: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

A Decade Follow-up of a Thalassemia Major (TM) Cohort Monitored by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR): Significant Reduction In Patients with Cardiac Iron and In Total Mortality

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1011.1011 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1011-1011 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Alison S Thomas ◽

Maciej Garbowski ◽

Ai Leen Ang ◽

Farrukh T Shah ◽

J. Malcolm Walker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chelation Therapy ◽

Thalassemia Major ◽

Iron Loading ◽

Myocardial Iron ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cardiac Iron

Abstract Abstract 1011 Background. CMR was introduced in London to assess myocardial iron loading in 1999 and some of these patients now have 10 years of follow-up, most with contemporary CMR determinations. The impact of long-term monitoring of myocardial iron loading in thalassemia major (TM) on the proportion of patients with increased myocardial iron (cT2* <20ms) and on patterns of mortality has not been previously described in a longitudinal cohort over this duration. Patients and Methods. All patients regularly attending two London thalassemia centres, who received their first CMR Jan 1999 - Dec 2000 were analyzed as a cohort. Patients underwent initial CMR at the Royal Brompton Hospital and received CMR follow up (FU) either there or at the Heart Hospital (UCLH). 132 patients were identified as having received a CMR in 1999–2000. A minimum 7 years CMR FU was required for inclusion in the long-term CMR analysis. 109 patients had at least 7 years of CMR follow up (range 7.0–10.6 years, median 9.2). The median age at 1st CMR was 27.9 years (range 7.7 – 49.5 years). At baseline, patients were receiving chelation with deferoxamine (DFO) monotherapy (70%), deferiprone (DFP) monotherapy (21%), or a combination of these agents (9%). At latest FU, patients were receiving DFO (32%), deferasirox (DFX) (28%), DFP (22%), or combined DFP and DFO therapy (18%). Results: Improvement in cardiac iron: In 1999–2000, 60% of TM patients had cT2* values ≤20ms and 17% had cT2* values <10ms. By contrast, at long term FU, only 23% now have cT2* ≤20ms, 7% have cT2* values <10ms (p<0.001). Changes to chelation therapy: 31% of patients stayed on the same chelator; 33% had 1 chelator switch, 26% 2 switches and 11% 3 or more switches. 18 switches in chelation therapy were due to side-effects (12 DFP, 5 DFX, 1 DFO). There were 9 breaks in chelation therapy during pregnancy in 8 different women. The proportions of patients with T2* < 20ms fell significantly for those who remained on DFO or DFP monotherapies throughout, or who changed chelation modalities on only one (p=0.002) or two (p=0.02) occasions. Patients who received had 3 or more switches did not show a improvement in this respect. The latter group was also the only subset that showed significant deterioration in myocardial iron (p<0.001). Mortality rates: the overall mortality rate for the initial cohort was 1.65 per 1000 patient years (95% CI 0.71 – 3.24); median age at death 35.6 years (range 27.3–48.4). This is a substantial improvement in the mortality index compared with the UK thalassemia registry data, of 4.3 per 1000 patient years during the period 2000–2003 (Modell et al, JCMR, 2008). The incidence rate ratio is 0.387 (95% CI 0.11–0.961), p<0.05, with patients in our cohort 61% less likely to die than those in the 2000–2003 cohort. Causes of death: there were 8 deaths during the FU period: 3 with complications of hepatitis C (all with cT2* > 20ms), 3 with sepsis (2 with cT2* <10ms and impaired ejection fraction, 1 with cT2* of 18ms), 1 with breast cancer, 1 with sudden unexplained death (cT2* > 20ms). Thus in only 2 patients could excessive cardiac iron loading be considered a causal/contributory factor. There was no significant difference in the baseline cT2* between those who died and those currently still alive (p= 0.2), meaning that death as a drop-out cause does not explain iron loading trends over FU. Chelators at death: DFO (4), DFP (2), DFX (1), combination (1). Conclusions: Over a decade we have seen an almost 3 fold fall in the proportion of patients with myocardial iron overload. Mortality has become substantially lower and cardiac iron overload is no longer the leading cause of mortality. In addition to CMR, this decade has seen the advent of two new oral iron chelators and many patients switched chelation regimen, sometimes several times, during the follow up period. Whilst the contribution of the individual components of this practice to the improved outcome cannot be concluded without randomized studies, it is clear that this modern management of TM is associated with reduced TM mortality. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Deferiprone is off label in the USA but licensed in Europe. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apotex/ Swedish Orphan: Honoraria. Pennell:Siemens: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Apotex: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cardiovascular Imaging Solutions: Director of CVIS, Equity Ownership. Porter:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

What Predicts Adrenal Insufficiency in Patients with Thalassemia Major?

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.5299.5299 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 5299-5299

Author(s):

Karen E Huang ◽

Steven D Mittelman ◽

Thomas D. Coates ◽

Mitchell Geffner ◽

John C Wood

Keyword(s):

Iron Overload ◽

Adrenal Insufficiency ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cortisol Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Thalassemia Major ◽

Stimulation Test ◽

Glucagon Stimulation Test ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Research Contract

Abstract Abstract 5299 Background: Thalassemia is one of the most common genetic blood disorders worldwide. With recent improvements in medical therapy, patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia, i.e., thalassemia major, are living longer. As a result, there is a greater need to address endocrine complications related to chronic iron overload. Adrenal insufficiency (AI), in particular, is important to identify because therapies are available and can be life-saving. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to determine the prevalence of AI in our population of subjects with thalassemia major; to identify risk factors that predict AI in these individuals; and to localize the origin of the AI within the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Methods: This is a prospective study of individuals with thalassemia major with an enrollment goal of 30 subjects. All subjects enrolled were initially tested for AI using a glucagon stimulation test. Those found to have AI (stimulated cortisol <18 mcg/dL) subsequently underwent an ovine corticotrophin-releasing hormone (oCRH) stimulation test for confirmatory purposes and to define the physiological basis for the AI. Results: Eleven subjects (8 - 29 years old, 6 female) have been enrolled to date. In our population of patients with TM, the prevalence of AI was 55%. There was no correlation between age, number of years transfused, or ferritin levels and AI. All male patients failed the glucagon stimulation test, whereas 5 of 6 females passed the glucagon stimulation test, p = 0.0024. There was no correlation between 8 AM ACTH levels and 8 AM cortisol levels. There was a significant correlation (p = 0.025) between 8 AM cortisol level and peak cortisol level following glucagon stimulation testing. Of the six subjects with AI, two subjects subsequently failed the oCRH stimulation test (peak cortisol < 21.9 mcg/dL). In these two subjects, peak oCRH ACTH levels were elevated, 144 and 164 pg/mL, respectively, suggesting primary adrenal insufficiency. Conclusions: We conclude that 8 AM cortisol level is a good predictor of adrenal insufficiency in our population, and can potentially be used as a simple screening test for AI with a strong negative predictive value. There appears to be a male predominance of AI in our population. This may indicate a protective role of female sex in this population. Two subjects had classic primary AI with robust ACTH levels in the face of inadequate cortisol production following oCRH testing. Four subjects (all males) who failed the glucagon stimulation test subsequently demonstrated normal ACTH and cortisol response to oCRH, indicating a possible hypothalamic origin to their AI. This dysfunction is likely independent of iron overload and warrants further investigation. Alternatively, these subjects may have impaired sympathetic nervous system function leading to hypoglycemic unawareness. Both outcomes are novel to the field and of medical significance. Disclosures: Geffner: Daiichi- Sankyo: Steering Committee for Clinical Trial; Eli Lilly, Inc.: Research Contract; Endo Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ipsen: Data Safety Monitoring Board and Research Contract; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Optimizing Iron Chelation Therapy with Deferasirox for Non-Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia Patients: 1-Year Results from the Phase IV, Open-Label Thetis Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2153.2153 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2153-2153

Author(s):

Ali T Taher ◽

M Domenica Cappellini ◽

Yesim Aydinok ◽

John B. Porter ◽

Zeynep Karakas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Serum Creatinine ◽

Iron Overload ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Iron Chelation ◽

Relative Reduction ◽

Average Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Absolute Change

Abstract Background: Efficacy and safety of iron chelation with deferasirox (Exjade®; DFX) 5 and 10 mg/kg/day (escalated to max: 20 mg/kg/day) in non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients, was established in the placebo-controlled, THALASSA study; Taher et al Blood 2012;120:970-977. THETIS added to this evidence by investigating a broader patient population, including non-transfusion-dependent congenital anemia patients and those treated with concomitant medications (eg hydroxyurea) and by evaluating early escalation with higher DFX doses according to liver iron concentration (LIC; max: 30 mg/kg/day). Methods: Patients ≥10 yrs of age with iron overload (LIC ≥5 mg Fe/g dry weight [dw]) and serum ferritin (SF) ≥300 ng/mL were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included: blood transfusions within 6 months of study enrollment or anticipated regular transfusions (unplanned transfusions allowed); Hb S/β thalassemia; active hepatitis B/C; cirrhosis; history of clinically relevant ocular and/or auditory toxicity; on two consecutive measurements: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >5×the upper limit of normal (ULN), serum creatinine >ULN, creatinine clearance ≤40 mL/min, or urine protein/urine creatinine ratio >1.0 mg/mg. All patients started DFX at 10 mg/kg/day. At week 4, DFX was increased according to baseline (BL) LIC: LIC >15, 20 mg/kg/day; LIC >7-≤15, 15 mg/kg/day; LIC ≥5-≤7, 10 mg/kg/day. At week 24, DFX was adjusted further: LIC >15, +5-10 mg/kg/day (max 30 mg/kg/day); LIC >7-≤15, +5 mg/kg/day (max 20 mg/kg/day); LIC ≥3-≤7, same dose. If LIC <3 or SF <300 ng/mL, therapy was held and restarted at the previously effective dose when LIC ≥5 and SF ≥300 ng/mL (max 10 mg/kg/day). The primary efficacy endpoint was absolute change in LIC from BL to week 52. Secondary endpoints included absolute change in LIC from BL to week 24 and change in SF from BL to week 52. Results: 134 patients were enrolled consisting of β thalassemia intermedia (n=69), Hb H disease (n=40), Hb E/β thalassemia (n=24) and congenital dyserythropoietic anemia (n=1) patients. Mean actual daily DFX dose ± SD over 1 yr (considering dose adjustments) was 14.70 ± 5.48 mg/kg/day. Mean LIC ± SD decreased significantly from 15.13 ± 10.72 mg Fe/g dw at BL to 8.46 ± 6.25 mg Fe/g dw at week 52 (absolute change, ‒6.68 ± 7.02 mg Fe/g dw [95% CI: -7.91, -5.45]; P <0.0001). At the last assessment, an absolute decrease in LIC of ≥3 mg Fe/g dw was observed in 86 (64.2%) patients and a ≥30% relative reduction in LIC in 81 (60.4%) patients. Reduction in LIC was greater in patients with higher BL LIC, with these patients receiving a higher than average dose (Figure). Median SF (range) decreased from 1001 (232-6638) ng/mL at BL to 669 (200-4315) ng/mL at week 52 (absolute median change, -304 [-5307 to -1669] ng/mL). 112 (83.58%) patients completed 1 yr. Patients discontinued primarily because of withdrawal of consent (n=10, personal/logistical reasons). Adverse events (AE) regardless of causality were reported in 97 (72.4%) patients and were unaffected by average dose. AEs with a suspected relationship to DFX were reported in 42 (31.3%) patients; most commonly, gastrointestinal (abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, nausea; n=6 each). One patient had a suspected drug-related serious AE (pancreatitis) that lasted 11 days; DFX was withheld for the duration, then restarted. One patient discontinued because of an AE (extramedullary hematopoiesis) and one death occurred (pneumonia leading to cardiac failure); neither suspected as drug-related. One patient had an elevated BL ALT 2×ULN that increased to >5×ULN on one occasion; BL bilirubin levels were 2×ULN and alkaline phosphatase 1.5×ULN; without dose adjustment or interruption, all parameters improved better than baseline values by week 52. No patient had two consecutive serum creatinine increases >33% above BL or >ULN. All patients with notable renal or liver laboratory values continued treatment. Conclusions: DFX 10 mg/kg/day (escalated to max: 30 mg/kg/day) resulted in significant and clinically relevant reductions in iron overload, with a similar safety profile as reported in THALASSA (in both DFX- and placebo-treated patients). With early dose escalation at week 4 with further adjustment at week 24, patients with a higher iron burden received higher DFX doses. These results support early dose escalation of DFX to optimize chelation in more heavily iron-overloaded patients with non-transfusion-dependent anemias. Disclosures Taher: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cappellini:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genzyme/Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Aydinok:Cerus: Research Funding; Sideris: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Porter:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy. Karakas:Novartis: Research Funding. Viprakasit:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GPO, Thailand: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding. Siritanaratkul:Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding. Kattamis:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ApoPharma: Speakers Bureau. Wang:Novartis: Employment. Zhu:Novartis: Employment. Joaquin:Novartis: Employment. Uwamahoro:Novartis: Employment.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Subgroup Analyses from Azacitidine Vs. Decitabine in Unfit Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Results from the Pethema Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150649 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1256-1256

Author(s):

Jorge Labrador ◽

Adolfo de la Fuente ◽

David Martínez-Cuadrón ◽

Rebeca Rodríguez-Veiga ◽

Josefina Serrano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Real Life ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Baseline Characteristics

Abstract INTRODUCTION The hypomethylating agents (HMAs), decitabine (DEC) and azacitidine (AZA), have made it possible to treat more elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Both HMAs have demonstrated efficacy in monotherapy and in combination with targeted therapies. However, there is little direct comparative data on AZA and DEC in first-line treatment, and we do not know which group of patients might benefit from each drug. Results of the full analysis set (FAS) were presented previously (Labrador J, et al. ASH 2020). Here, we report long-term clinical efficacy from prespecified patient subgroup analyses. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study to compare real-life clinical outcomes between AZA and DEC in patients with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy included in the PETHEMA registry, and analyzed clinical variables associated with response and overall survival (OS) between AZA and DEC. RESULTS A total of 626 patients were included for the FAS between 2006 and 2019. 487 (78%) received AZA and 139 (22%) received DEC. Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups, except for the percentage of bone marrow blasts (44% vs. 34% in the DEC group compared to AZA, p=0.010). In the FAS, there was no difference in the CR, CR/CRi or ORR (CR/RCi + PR) rate: 18%, 20.5% and 32% with AZA vs. 23%, 25% and 39.5% with DEC (p=0.20, p=0.27 and p=0.12). In the subgroup analysis, DEC was associated with higher CR/CRi rate than AZA in patients with ECOG ≥ 2 (95% CI: 0.088 - 0.801), bone marrow blast count < 50% (95% CI: 0.293 - 0.965), secondary AML (95% CI: 0.223 - 0.918) and adverse cytogenetics (95% CI: 0.171 - 0.857) (Figure 1A). DEC was associated with higher ORR rate than AZA in patients with ECOG ≥ 2 (95% CI: 0.116 - 0.782), leukocytes < 10 x10 9/L (95% CI: 0.321 - 0.920) and bone marrow blasts < 50% (95% CI: 0.321 - 0.920) (Figure 1B) 120 days-mortality was 25.4% after AZA and 27.1% after DEC, p=0.70. Patients who did not achieve at least a PR had significantly higher 120-day mortality with both HMAs (OR 8.85 and 8.22 for AZA and DEC, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, patients with leukocytes ≥ 10 x10 9/L (95% CI: 1.069 - 4.157) and those with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73m 2 (95% CI: 1.249 - 4.664) had higher 120-day mortality with DEC than with AZA (Figure 1C) With a median follow-up of 12 months, median OS was 10.4 months (95% CI: 9.2 - 11.7) for AZA vs. 8.8 months (95% CI: 6.7 - 11.0) for DEC (p = 0.455). The subgroup analysis revealed that patients ≥ 80 years (95%: CI 1.005 - 2.341), with leukocytes ≥ 10 x10 9/L (95% CI 1.039 - 2.062), platelet count <20 x10 9/L (95% CI: 1.150 - 3.422) and those with eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73m 2 (95% CI: 1.040 - 2.059) did benefit for treatment with AZA compared to DEC (Figure 1D). CONCLUSIONS Our study provides real-life data on the outcomes of AML patients treated with AZA compared to DEC in a large retrospective cohort with long-term follow-up. In addition, we identify for the first time some baseline characteristics that could benefit from AZA or DEC in terms of responses, 120-day mortality and OS. These findings could help us to choose the most appropriate HMA in monotherapy or for the development of new combinations. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures de la Fuente: Novartis: Research Funding; Abbie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Tormo: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Pérez-Simón: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Montesinos: Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Tolero Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Stemline/Menarini: Consultancy; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Clinical Parameters in 391 Iron-Overloaded Patients with Lower-Risk MDS Enrolled in a Prospective, Non-Interventional Multicenter Registry.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.4834.4834 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 4834-4834

Author(s):

Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽

Billie J. Marek ◽

Roger M. Lyons ◽

Noelia Martinez-Lopez ◽

Carole Paley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Iron Overload ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Serum Ferritin ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chelation Therapy ◽

Iron Chelation ◽

Iron Chelation Therapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4834 Introduction Despite recent improvements in therapies for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), 60–80% will require continuing packed red cell blood (pRBC) transfusions for prolonged periods. Complications resulting from the iron burden may, therefore, become clinically significant for many patients during the course of their disease. Patients with lower-risk MDS have a greater chance of developing the long-term toxicity of iron overload because of their prolonged survival, and are more likely to benefit from effective iron chelation therapy. This report describes data from a registry designed to study the impact of iron overload and iron chelation therapy on organ function and survival in patients with lower-risk MDS. Methods This is an ongoing, prospective, non-interventional, multicenter 5-year registry in 107 US centers, enrolling 600 patients (aged ≥18 years) with lower-risk MDS (by WHO, FAB and/or IPSS criteria) and transfusional iron overload (defined as serum ferritin ≥1000 μg/L and/or having received ≤20 cumulative pRBC units and/or an ongoing transfusion requirement ≥6 units every 12 weeks). Follow-up will be performed at least every 6 months for a maximum of 60 months or until death. Recommended assessments include serum ferritin, creatinine, calculated creatinine clearance, echocardiograms, and endocrine and hematological status. Results As of May 31 2009, 391 patients have enrolled in the registry. Demographic data are available from 389 patients. Median age: 74.4 years (range 21–99); male: 218, female: 171; ethnicity: 331 Caucasian (85%), 25 African-American (6%), 24 Hispanic (6%), five Asian (1%), two Native American (0.5%), and two other (0.5%). The median time since diagnosis (n=385) was <3 years in 217 patients (56%); ≥3–<5 years in 72 (19%); ≥5–<7 years in 48 (12%); and ≥7 years in 48 (12%). The MDS classification of the patients by WHO, FAB and IPSS, as well as patients' serum ferritin and transfusion burden, are summarized in the table. The most frequent concomitant conditions classified by organ (n=384 patients) were: 205 (53%) patients with vascular, 160 (42%) endocrine, and 171 (45%) cardiac dysfunction. At registry entry, 249 patients were receiving erythropoietin; 61 granulocyte colony stimulating factor; seven hydroxyurea; 25 thalidomide (Thalomid); 147 5-azacytidine (Vidaza); 95 lenalidomide (Revlimid) and 90 decitabine (Dacogen). 137 of 391 (35%) patients were on iron chelation therapy at study entry: 34 (9%) received deferoxamine for mean and median treatment durations of 803 and 383 (range 1–4386) days, respectively, while 117 (30%) received deferasirox for mean and median durations of 488 and 396 (9–1269) days, respectively. Calculated creatinine clearance was normal (>80 mL/min) in 37 (9%) patients; mildly abnormal (51–80 mL/min) in 30 (8%); and moderately abnormal (30–50 mL/min) in nine (2%) patients. Conclusions These baseline data indicate the demographic distribution as well as the co-morbidities associated with lower-risk MDS patients. In spite of recent guidelines, fewer than 50% of iron-overloaded patients are receiving any iron chelation treatment, despite the presence of cardiac, vascular and endocrine concomitant conditions in 40-54% of patients. Recent retrospective data highlights the impact of chelation on mortality in lower-risk MDS patients. This ongoing registry will prospectively assess the impact of iron chelation on survival and organ function in iron-overloaded patients with lower-risk MDS. Disclosures Lyons: Novartis: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Research Funding. Martinez-Lopez:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Paley:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Greenberg:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Anatomical Predictors of Venous Thromboembolism Recurrence after Isolated Superficial Vein Thrombosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.651.651 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 651-651

Author(s):

Jean-Philippe Galanaud ◽

Marie-Antoinette Sevestre ◽

Céline Genty ◽

Susan R Kahn ◽

Gilles Pernod ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Superficial Vein ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Vein Thrombosis ◽

Superficial Vein Thrombosis ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background: Isolated superficial vein thrombosis (iSVT) (i.e. without concurrent deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) is a frequent event. Its clinical significance and management are controversial. Data on long-term follow-up are scarce and the impact of anatomical characteristics of iSVT on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (DVT and/or PE) recurrence has not been assessed. Objective: To determine the impact of anatomical characteristics of iSVT on the long-term risk of VTE recurrence. Methods: Using data from the The OPTIMEV (OPTimisation de l'Interrogatoire dans l'_evaluation du risque throMbo-Embolique Veineux) study, a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we assessed at 3 years in patients recruited for an objectively confirmed iSVT i) cumulative rates of DVT, PE and SVT recurrences using the Kaplan-Meier method; and ii) anatomical predictors of VTE recurrence (SVT involving the sapheno-femoral junction (i.e. ≤3 cm), SVT of the trunk of the great saphenous vein, bilateral SVT, SVT occurring in a varicose vein (i.e. C≥2 according to CEAP classification) using a Cox multivariable model adjusted for age, sex, cancer and personal history of VTE. At baseline, all patients with SVT underwent a complete bilateral swhole leg ultrasound to exclude concurrent DVT and during follow-up, all suspected VTE recurrences were confirmed/ruled out with objective tests. All recurrences were centrally adjudicated by the study's expert committee. Results: Among the 479 recruited patients with iSVT, 12.5% (n=60) had a thrombotic recurrence during the 3 years of follow-up. Cumulative rates of recurrence as a PE, DVT and iSVT were 1.9%, 4.8% and 5.8%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a thrombus involving the sapheno-femoral junction at baseline independently increased the risk of VTE recurrence (HR=3.34 [1.5-7.2]). Presence of varicose veins also increased the risk but this result did not reach statistical significance (HR=1.8 [0.9 - 3.9], p=0.11). Conclusion: In an unselected population of patients with iSVT, long-term risk of VTE recurrence is substantial. Involvement of the sapheno-femoral junction is a strong independent predictor of VTE during the subsequent 3 years. Our results suggest the need for more aggressive management and follow-up of patients with iSVT exhibiting this anatomical characteristic. Disclosures Galanaud: Daichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sevestre:bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Pernod:pfizer: Consultancy; leo: Consultancy; bristol meyers: Consultancy; Daichi: Consultancy; bayer: Consultancy. Brisot:bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; daichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Quéré:3-M: Research Funding; thuasne: Research Funding; aspen: Research Funding; daichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; leo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text