scholarly journals Identifying obstructive sleep apnoea patients responsive to supplemental oxygen therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 1800674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott A. Sands ◽  
Bradley A. Edwards ◽  
Philip I. Terrill ◽  
James P. Butler ◽  
Robert L. Owens ◽  
...  

A possible precision-medicine approach to treating obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) involves targeting ventilatory instability (elevated loop gain) using supplemental inspired oxygen in selected patients. Here we test whether elevated loop gain and three key endophenotypic traits (collapsibility, compensation and arousability), quantified using clinical polysomnography, can predict the effect of supplemental oxygen on OSA severity.36 patients (apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) >20 events·h−1) completed two overnight polysomnographic studies (single-blinded randomised-controlled crossover) on supplemental oxygen (40% inspired) versus sham (air). OSA traits were quantified from the air-night polysomnography. Responders were defined by a ≥50% reduction in AHI (supine non-rapid eye movement). Secondary outcomes included blood pressure and self-reported sleep quality.Nine of 36 patients (25%) responded to supplemental oxygen (ΔAHI=72±5%). Elevated loop gain was not a significant univariate predictor of responder/non-responder status (primary analysis). In post hoc analysis, a logistic regression model based on elevated loop gain and other traits (better collapsibility and compensation; cross-validated) had 83% accuracy (89% before cross-validation); predicted responders exhibited an improvement in OSA severity (ΔAHI 59±6% versus 12±7% in predicted non-responders, p=0.0001) plus lowered morning blood pressure and “better” self-reported sleep.Patients whose OSA responds to supplemental oxygen can be identified by measuring their endophenotypic traits using diagnostic polysomnography.

Respiration ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 311-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Lettau ◽  
Esther I. Schwarz ◽  
John R. Stradling ◽  
Malcolm Kohler

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A12-A13
Author(s):  
B Edwards ◽  
D Vena ◽  
L Thomson ◽  
A Gikas ◽  
R Radmand ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) considered ‘non-responders’ to mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy, typically have a high loop gain contributing to their OSA physiology. While MAD does not improve loop gain, other treatments such as supplemental oxygen can have a strong effect on this pathogenic trait. Therefore, we conducted a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether the administration of supplemental oxygen in combination with a MAD, was associated with greater improvements in OSA severity compared to MAD therapy alone. Methods Patients recently diagnosed with OSA underwent an initial screening sleep study to confirm the presence of moderate-severe OSA (Apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI]>20events/hr). Eligible patients were then enrolled in a randomised single-blind cross-over trial involving 4 sleep studies with the following treatments; MAD, oxygen (4L/min), MAD+oxygen and room-air/sham (control). The primary outcome was the reduction in AHI (%baseline). Results Of the 57 participants screened, 35 met the eligibility criteria (Baseline/Screening AHI = 52±22 events/hr). Compared to the sham night, all treatments significantly reduced the AHI; a 35% [CI: 18–48] was seen with oxygen (p<0.0002), a 53% [CI: 40–64] was seen with MAD (p<0.0001) and a 67% [CI: 56–76] was seen with MAD+oxygen (p<0.0001). Importantly, the combination of MAD+oxygen was associated with a significant reduction in AHI relative to MAD alone (15% [CI:4–24] p=0.01). Discussion In a population with moderate-severe OSA, preliminary analyses from this trial suggests that the addition of supplemental oxygen in combination with MAD therapy provided greater reductions in OSA severity than either treatment alone.


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1901945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martino F. Pengo ◽  
Davide Soranna ◽  
Alice Giontella ◽  
Elisa Perger ◽  
Paola Mattaliano ◽  
...  

The treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or mandibular advancement devices (MADs) is associated with blood pressure (BP) reduction; however, the overall effect is modest. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of such treatments on BP was to identify subgroups of patients who respond best to treatment.The article search was performed in three different databases with specific search terms and selection criteria. From 2289 articles, we included 68 RCTs that compared CPAP or MADs with either passive or active treatment. When all the studies were pooled together, CPAP and MADs were associated with a mean BP reduction of −2.09 (95% CI −2.78– −1.40) mmHg for systolic BP and −1.92 (95% CI −2.40– −1.43) mmHg for diastolic BP and −1.27 (95% CI −2.34– −0.20) mmHg for systolic BP and −1.11 (95% CI −1.82– −0.41) mmHg for diastolic BP, respectively. The subgroups of patients who showed a greater response were those aged <60 years (systolic BP −2.93 mmHg), with uncontrolled BP at baseline (systolic BP −4.14 mmHg) and with severe oxygen desaturations (minimum arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry <77%) at baseline (24-h systolic BP −7.57 mmHg).Although this meta-analysis shows that the expected reduction of BP by CPAP/MADs is modest, it identifies specific characteristics that may predict a pronounced benefit from CPAP in terms of BP control. These findings should be interpreted with caution; however, they are particularly important in identifying potential phenotypes associated with BP reduction in patients treated for OSA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 1901526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Gaisl ◽  
Protazy Rejmer ◽  
Sira Thiel ◽  
Sarah R. Haile ◽  
Martin Osswald ◽  
...  

IntroductionContinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is currently the treatment of choice for sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA); however, adherence is often thought to be suboptimal. We investigated the effects of suboptimal CPAP usage on objective and subjective sleepiness parameters in patients with OSA.Material and methodsIn this 2-week, parallel, double-blind, randomised controlled trial we enrolled moderate-to-severe OSA patients with excessive pre-treatment daytime sleepiness (Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) score >10 points) who had suboptimal CPAP adherence over ≥12 months (mean nightly usage time 3–4 h). Patients were allocated through minimisation to either subtherapeutic CPAP (“sham CPAP”) or continuation of CPAP (“therapeutic CPAP”). A Bayesian analysis with historical priors calculated the posterior probability of superiority.ResultsBetween May, 2016 and November, 2018, 57 patients (aged 60±8 years, 79% male, 93% Caucasian) were allocated in total, and 52 who completed the study (50% in each arm) were included in the final analysis. The unadjusted ESS score increase was 2.4 points (95% CI 0.6–4.2, p=0.01) in the sham-CPAP group when compared to continuing therapeutic CPAP. The probability of superiority of therapeutic CPAP over sham CPAP was 90.4% for ESS, 90.1% for systolic blood pressure and 80.3% for diastolic blood pressure.ConclusionsPatients with moderate-to-severe OSA and daytime sleepiness are still getting a substantial benefit from suboptimal CPAP adherence, albeit not as much as they might get if they adhered more. Whether a similar statement can be made for even lower adherence levels remains to be established in future trials.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 294-300
Author(s):  
Hasthi U. Dissanayake ◽  
Kate Sutherland ◽  
Craig L. Phillips ◽  
Ronald R. Grunstein ◽  
Anastasia S. Mihailidou ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Börgel ◽  
Tino Schulz ◽  
Nina K. Bartels ◽  
Jörg T. Epplen ◽  
Nikolaus Büchner ◽  
...  

OSA (obstructive sleep apnoea) stimulates sympathetic nervous activity and elevates resting HR (heart rate) and BP (blood pressure). In the present study in a cohort of 309 untreated OSA patients, the resting HR and BP during the daytime were correlated with AHI (apnoea/hypopnea index) and compared with patients with R389R (n=162), R389G (n=125) and G389G (n=22) genotypes of the β1-adrenoreceptor R389G polymorphism. We analysed the impact of the genotype on the decline of HR and BP in a subgroup of 148 patients (R389R, n=86; R389G, n=54; G389G, n=8) during a 6-month follow-up period under CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) therapy during which cardiovascular medication remained unchanged. In untreated OSA patients, we found an independent relationship between AHI and resting HR (β=0.096, P<0.001), systolic BP (β=0.09, P=0.021) and diastolic BP (β=0.059, P=0.016). The resting HR/BP, however, did not differ among carriers with the R389R, R389G and G389G genotypes. CPAP therapy significantly reduced HR [−2.5 (−1.1 to −4.0) beats/min; values are mean difference (95% confidence intervals)] and diastolic BP [−3.2 (−1.5 to −5.0) mmHg]. The decline in HR was more significantly pronounced in the R389R group compared with the Gly389 carriers [−4.1 (−2.3 to −5.9) beats/min (P<0.001) compared with −0.2 (2.1 to −2.6) beats/min (P=0.854) respectively; Student's t test between groups, P=0.008]. Diastolic BP was decreased significantly (P<0.001) only in Gly389 carriers (R389G or G389G) compared with R389R carriers [−5.0 (−2.3 to −7.6) mmHg compared with −2.0 (0.4 to −4.3) mmHg respectively]. ANOVA revealed a significant difference (P=0.023) in HR reduction between the three genotypes [−4.1 (±8.4) beats/min for R389R, −0.5 (±9.3) beats/min for R389G and +1.9 (±7.2) beats/min for G389G]. In conclusion, although the R389G polymorphism of the β1-adrenoceptor gene did not influence resting HR or BP in untreated OSA patients, it may modify the beneficial effects of CPAP therapy on these parameters.


2012 ◽  
Vol 590 (5) ◽  
pp. 1199-1211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley A. Edwards ◽  
Scott A. Sands ◽  
Danny J. Eckert ◽  
David P. White ◽  
James P. Butler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document