scholarly journals NeEMO: a method using residue interaction networks to improve prediction of protein stability upon mutation

BMC Genomics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (Suppl 4) ◽  
pp. S7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Giollo ◽  
Alberto JM Martin ◽  
Ian Walsh ◽  
Carlo Ferrari ◽  
Silvio CE Tosatto
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 2082-2095 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Tse ◽  
G. M. Verkhivker

Computational modelling of efficiency and robustness of the residue interaction networks and allosteric pathways in kinase structures can characterize protein kinase sensitivity to drug binding and drug resistance effects.


Structure ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Denise Okafor ◽  
David Hercules ◽  
Steven A. Kell ◽  
Eric A. Ortlund

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 140306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omkar Singh ◽  
Kunal Sawariya ◽  
Polamarasetty Aparoy

Over the years, various computational methodologies have been developed to understand and quantify receptor–ligand interactions. Protein–ligand interactions can also be explained in the form of a network and its properties. The ligand binding at the protein-active site is stabilized by formation of new interactions like hydrogen bond, hydrophobic and ionic. These non-covalent interactions when considered as links cause non-isomorphic sub-graphs in the residue interaction network. This study aims to investigate the relationship between these induced sub-graphs and ligand activity. Graphlet signature-based analysis of networks has been applied in various biological problems; the focus of this work is to analyse protein–ligand interactions in terms of neighbourhood connectivity and to develop a method in which the information from residue interaction networks, i.e. graphlet signatures, can be applied to quantify ligand affinity. A scoring method was developed, which depicts the variability in signatures adopted by different amino acids during inhibitor binding, and was termed as GSUS (graphlet signature uniqueness score). The score is specific for every individual inhibitor. Two well-known drug targets, COX-2 and CA-II and their inhibitors, were considered to assess the method. Residue interaction networks of COX-2 and CA-II with their respective inhibitors were used. Only hydrogen bond network was considered to calculate GSUS and quantify protein–ligand interaction in terms of graphlet signatures. The correlation of the GSUS with pIC 50 was consistent in both proteins and better in comparison to the Autodock results. The GSUS scoring method was better in activity prediction of molecules with similar structure and diverse activity and vice versa. This study can be a major platform in developing approaches that can be used alone or together with existing methods to predict ligand affinity from protein–ligand complexes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document